What Turns Us On
So, What Does It For You? We Asked, Boston Answered…
To find out how Bostonians define attractiveness, we created a 30-point survey with the help of Babson College statistics professor I. Elaine Allen. Along with posting it on our website, we dispatched pollsters across the Hub to interview people at T stops, coffee shops, and the occasional happy hour. Finally, we partnered with Cambridge-based dating website OkCupid, which hosted our poll on its home page. All told, we collected more than 1,100 responses—and plenty of eye-opening insight. For complete survey results, click here.
• Forty percent of the Bostonians we polled say a blue-eyed boy will get that second glance, followed by 26% for green eyes, 21% for brown, and 13% for hazel—numbers nearly identical to the breakdown for women’s eye color.
• The choicest height for local guys is 6′–6’3", which matches up nicely with our ideal gal, right, in heels.
• You want your men to be music lovers (18%), sports fans (16%), and outdoorsy types (15%). Of lesser appeal: tech geeks (3%) and nightlife aficionados (3%).
• Good news for the ironing-averse: jeans and a t-shirt is the best look for Boston men, say more than half of those polled. Workout attire scored lowest (2%) among choices for hunky menswear. (Which may explain why less than 2% of those surveyed reported meeting a boyfriend at the gym.)
• A small, straight nose is the winner by a 2-to-1 margin over all other sniffer shapes. Least favored was the snub nose, at 5% (it fared far better on women, at 38%).
• The clean-shaven look was voted most appealing, at 47%, but guys who can’t get to a razor every day shouldn’t fret—about 43% of voters say stubble also gets the job done. Goatees, though, are a bad idea. They’re dug by just 6% of respondents. Beards polled even worse (5%).
• The gold standard for men’s hair color isn’t blond (preferred by fewer than one in 10 respondents), but rather brown (71%), which was followed, though not that closely, by black (16%).
• Shaggy dudes: Four out of every five potential mates who pass you on the street think you’d look better with short hair.
• As men’s body parts go, you find shoulders (35%) and arms (29%) the most irresistible. You also think legs, which earned just 5% approval, should stay under wraps.
• Banking is considered the hottest job for Hub men (16%), but one of the least hottest for women (about 5%).
• Is it getting steamy in here, or is it just your glasses? By a surprising 3-to-1 ratio, Bostonians deem specs on women a turn-on (and think they’re pretty sexy on guys, too).
• An oval face is the shape preferred by a whopping 68% of the people we surveyed.
• The most alluring outfit for a woman is denim and a tee, say 46% of you. A scant 7% of respondents drool over a preppier sweater-and-khakis ensemble.
• Arty equals hottie, according to our respondents, a third of whom have a thing for artists or writers. The next most desirable vocation for women is physician (12%).
• The derrière and the legs tied for paramount female body part, with each prioritized by about 30% of voters. Hands, not so much (4%).
• An overly plump, Jolie-style pout gets the kiss-off from Hub voters (3%). Most like their gals with medium-full lips (51%).
• Survey says: The ideal Boston woman is about average height (5’4"–5’8"). But fewer than one in six Bostonians found women of 5’8" to 6′—a.k.a. the supermodel median—compellingly attractive.
Further Longings (and a Few No-Nos)
• In potential mates, you prefer dog lovers to cat people by a 5-to-1 ratio.
• About 20% of you believe men hit peak attractiveness in their forties or beyond; only 9% say the same about women.
• About 65% of you prefer your sweet nothings whispered sans Boston accent.
• Job combinations that inspire the least amount of panting: women as cops or firefighters (0.8%), men as waiters or bartenders (1.4%), and anyone as a politician (1.2%–1.6%).
• The most desirable trait in any Bostonian? That would be a good personality (62% overall). In a woman, the next-hottest quality is looks (24%); in a man, it’s intelligence (15%).
• Red hair on a woman revs up about 12% of local suitors. Red hair on a man, however, appeals to barely 2%.
• Harvard tops the list of sizzling alma maters for men (19%) and women (12%), followed by BU (8%/10%). But about half of you say it doesn’t matter where a potential S.O. went to college as long as they graduated.
• Of all the people we polled on what they find attractive in a partner, about half did not, in fact, have a partner at the moment.
When Kevin Met Amy
A He-Said/She-Said on Relationships, Boston-Style
[sidebar]Author Amy Sutherland improved her marriage with tips picked up during a year spent with exotic-animal trainers, an experience chronicled in her third book, What Shamu Taught Me About Life, Love, and Marriage, now out in paperback. Twentysomething Boston contributor Kevin Alexander has trolled the pages of Facebook, buddied up with the Hub’s cougar hunters, and infiltrated the hookup culture of the city’s social elite. In other words: They’re experts on relationships, and Boston relationships in particular. Though one of them, to hear the other tell it, might still have a lot to learn…
AMY: In Boston, where women can almost have it all, they want it all. Boston is a smorgasbord of smart, accomplished, active men. Some can run a marathon, discover new genes, and polish off a Junot Díaz epic in one day. A friend of mine just started dating a computer whiz and pilot; he also plays the trumpet and paints.
Let’s-talk-about-our-feelings types are in short supply here, except maybe in certain corners of Cambridge. Our women, who all possess at least a modicum of flinty, down-to-earth New England-ness, can live without the processing. We’d rather have a guy who can discuss evolutionary biology and what Obama should do about the banks than a guy who talks about how his mommy shaped his feelings.
We do appreciate macho when it’s expressed as gentlemanliness: Men here still open doors for women. They also don’t wear hats, gloves, or scarves in subzero wind chills (making Minnesota’s fleece-swaddled males look like babies); consequently, Boston men also score low on the cuddly meter. Typically, a man leaning over to pick up his mate’s dropped mitten constitutes a public display of affection. I think I speak for all us gals when I say I don’t need my mate to talk about his thoughts on holding hands in public, but please, please, just hold my hand, like, right in the middle of the Common.
KEVIN: I feel somewhat inadequate hearing your loving feelings about "smart, accomplished, active" Boston men. I also think you’re giving us a bit too much credit.
You say that your friend recently started dating a trumpet-playing computer whiz/pilot/painter, but is this guy a good guy? Does he make her laugh, or does he simply engage in a self-aggrandizing rundown of his talents? Those hobbies are pretty impressive, but don’t actually say anything about him.
AMY: I’m not saying that Boston women aren’t interested in men with more-average résumés. I’m saying that here, the ratio of über-males to average males is skewed. More-mortal types have much stiffer competition than in, say, Des Moines (here come the e-mails from Des Moines), and that is not lost on our females.
The thing is, this city draws both accomplished men and women, and women largely want to have relationships with their peers, ones that make them laugh (you’re right, that matters). Über-females want über-males. My friend with the computer-whiz pilot is a scuba-diving, motorcycle-riding hotshot.
But…what about what Boston men want?
KEVIN: Disposition and personality, for starters. Something that’s very specific, and very attractive, in Boston women is that quick, world-weary wit. Whether it’s the hopeless togetherness of a packed, stalled Green Line train, or the convenience of getting weather updates from the crazy shouting guy on Newbury, we want someone who recognizes the humor in life.
I wouldn’t necessarily say we want über-women, but we want an equal exchange, much more so here than in any other city. It may not necessarily swing 50-50, but at least with the couples I know, everyone gets their at-bats if they want them.
Men also want partnerships that go beyond the babies and buck production. Coming from hardy, pale, New England stock themselves, they want women who can ski Killington or Sunday River, hike around the Berkshires, or just act unfazed when they strike out at their slow-pitch softball game.
AMY: As for men wanting an equal partner, I can’t help thinking that the women are the ones insisting on it. But you’re right about men here expecting steely athleticism in females. My husband and I recently took a trip with a few Boston couples to Northern Maine. We skied and snowshoed and skied some more, with the women mostly leading the way. One gal could basically run in her snowshoes. Funny thing is, I’ve also never lived anywhere where women dress so ladylike, so many well-groomed ponytails and well-fitted skirts. I guess the steeliness helps them walk around town in heels all day.
KEVIN: Speaking of local pairs, my friends Matt and Jenna always come to mind when I think of prototypical Boston couples. He’s from the North Shore, went to Middlebury and Babson’s business school, then created a startup that turns food waste into energy. She’s from Boston, went to BB&N, was an All-American lacrosse player in college, went on to Harvard Business School, and is now a manager at an Internet company. They were married in Martha’s Vineyard, live in the South End, and rock that classic New England look: athletic and tall, lightly freckled, strawberry-blond hair, blue eyes, pale skin. Normally, people of that ilk tend to be almost indefatigably obnoxious, but they’re both good-natured with a dry sense of humor, and they refuse to take themselves seriously⁵ (all-important when your bio reeks of perfection). What I see in them is something I see repeated all over our city: smart, savvy, good-natured people with an eye on the future.
AMY: Your Boston couple strikes me as a little out of date. I know the type: well-pedigreed, upper-middle-class, fair-skinned natives. Twenty years ago, they dominated the city. But Boston has opened up, and today draws people from everywhere, from Kansas City to Rio.
The prototypical Boston match is now ultimately less about type than mindset, which you describe well (savvy, good-natured, and urbane). To that I would add high-energy. My friends Kim and Rob (both non-natives, by the way) are a good example. Rob works for an advertising firm and is writing a memoir. Kim is a Web marketing consultant who, on the side, started the Design Hive, a weekend market for local indie designers. Their calendars are full of eating out, socializing, and weekend trips. When their interests aren’t aligned, they head in separate directions: she to a vintage clothing store, he to a jazz show. They’re happy, if a bit tired.
Still, I can’t help wondering if we Bostonians, natives and transplants alike, almost are industrious to a fault. We don’t relax; we do something to relax. It wouldn’t hurt for us to learn to waste a little time, especially with our mates. In this way, we could be a bit less influenced by this city we live in. Maybe the newcomers from Rio can coach us, and in 20 years the prototypical Boston couple will not be jogging along the Esplanade, but napping on the grass, maybe even holding hands.
KEVIN: I dig your point about activity. As soon as the weather improves, I’m very willing to start a movement of non-movement throughout the city. And on that note, is what we (men and women) want romantically a product of our city’s vibe and reputation as a liberal, academic-snob hub or sports-obsessed college town?
AMY: Busy, active people make for busy, active relationships. Most couples I know here socialize a lot and do loads together, like all those paired-up runners along the Charles. As a result, we don’t suffer the homebound cocooning I’ve seen in other places I’ve lived. Cocooning leads to dull dinnertime debates about whether Randy Jackson says "dawg" too much on American Idol, or if flocked wallpaper in the foyer would be too showy. So, dawg, what do you think Bostonians want out of their relationships, beyond the aforementioned stuff?
KEVIN: I’ve thought about this long and relatively intensely, and I keep coming back to the idea of a collective investment in Boston, an ability to be simultaneously independent of and dependent on the city for our happiness. Although we complain about the weather and love getting nostalgic about our town’s grittier, more glorious past, Bostonians are a fiercely proud and loyal bunch.
A few years ago, I dated a grad student from the Midwest who would constantly remind me of the limited time she wanted to spend here. "People aren’t friendly…it’s impossible to get around…there are college kids everywhere." No matter how valid these criticisms were, I always found myself on the defensive, taking on, and making excuses for, Boston’s faults. Until it dawned on me: She would never get Boston. She didn’t have it in her. And, predictably, neither did we.
But here’s the thing: A lot of people do get it. They move here and embrace Boston, warts and all. And eventually they realize that a lot of what’s to love about Boston are the same things to love about our men and women: pockets of vigorous intelligence, fickle but ultimately undying sports passions, cheerfully misguided use of funds. You know how people’s pets start to look like them after a while? The same thing happens here. After a certain amount of time, people, couples, start to look like Boston.
AMY: Your point about Boston’s unique pride makes me realize how it affects the relationships of us transplants. It’s like being expatriates, and as such, as outsiders in this tribal town, I think mates draw closer together. Certainly my and my husband’s shared Midwestern roots would not be such a binding factor in most places. We wouldn’t wax poetic over brats or make fun of Boston’s lame snowplowing and heaps of rock salt. Boston has given us a secret language in a way we wouldn’t have experienced elsewhere.
KEVIN: In keeping with trying to make sense of the past to understand the future, I’m curious to know if you’ve noticed specific changes in the way women and men relate to each other in the years you’ve lived here. Do tell.
AMY: Much change is afoot, between shifting political winds and the quaking economy. Like a lot of people, I feel vaguely optimistic yet scared to death. Certainly that kind of anxiety is going to translate into how we relate to our mates. I know one thing for sure: Less business for restaurants means fewer couples are eating out, which spells trouble for couples. "Staying in" sounds great in theory, but it means more shopping, cooking, and cleaning—all fodder for domestic squabbles. Here, like everywhere, the battle of the sexes is fought skirmish by skirmish.
Why? What’s in your crystal ball?
KEVIN: Due to economic hardship, I’ve been forced to resort to a Magic 8 Ball, but luckily, after a vigorous shake, it reads "outlook promising." I think it’ll come as no surprise that we’ll start to see more and more Boston couples sharing the workload and the "kid load"⁸ as the job market tightens, but I don’t necessarily see this as a bad thing (except maybe for participation in 10:30 a.m. Bikram yoga classes). A shared power structure might mean more difficulty balancing things timewise, but it also means more engagement, a shared respect, and a (hopefully, anyway) healthy codependency.
The Geography of Coupling
Where the action is for those who are on the prowl, on the rebound, or happily settled down.
Illustration by James Kraus/ArtGuuy
• Carlisle is the go-to spot for power couples. Three-fourths of its residents hold management or professional jobs, the highest percentage in the state.
• With the most relationship and family therapists per capita, Newburyport couples have the best chance of working things out.
• Partnerships are strong in Andover: Just 1% of its married pairs are separated.
• Matrimony is thriving in Boxford, which has the state’s highest percentage of married couples with children (80%).
• There’s no need to be a cheap date around Wellesley men. Their median salary is well over $100,000.
• Boston has the state’s most diverse dating scene, with roughly 50% of the population being white, 25% black, 14% Latino, and 8% Asian.
• With median incomes of around $56,000, Dover women are among the highest-paid—and, perhaps, well-dressed—in the state.
• Some of the smartest catches live in Brookline: Nearly half its residents have graduate or professional degrees—the highest percentage in Massachusetts.
• With a bar or restaurant for every 200 residents, tiny Cohasset offers more nightlife than most Greater Boston towns.
• Aspiring trophy spouses should set their sights on Chatham, where 34% of the population is over 65 years old (and rich!).
• Chestnut Hill’s Met Bar is a pickup scene 2.0 for the western ‘burbs set.
• In the city, love at first sight is de rigueur on the dance floor of Cambridge’s Middlesex, at the bar of the South End’s Beehive, and in the produce section of the Beacon Hill Whole Foods.
• The barstools at Hingham’s Scarlet Oak Tavern are a choice spot for first dates.
• Duxbury rail commuters endure an average 40-minute ride to work, which makes the train ideal for people-watching and romance-starting.
• Once an old-timer’s cigar-smoke-and-whiskey-fueled spot, Carmela’s in Kingston has become a sanctuary for clandestine affairs.
• Power couples and the occasional cougar like to hit the bar at Alba in Quincy, the Abe & Louie’s of the South Shore.
He’s with Her?
16 Bostonians, more than 100 possible pairings. Can you spot the real-life lovebirds?
See the photos below, and then CLICK HERE for the answers.
Source URL: http://www.bostonmagazine.com/2009/04/what-turns-us-on/