Lost in the Weeds

According to the polls, Massachusetts voters are going to overwhelmingly approve a ballot initiative next month that legalizes medical marijuana. That should be good news for someone like me, who’s spent half his life smoking pot. So why am I feeling so uneasy?

“When legalization happens in one state and the sky doesn’t fall, all the other states are going to say, ‘What are we, idiots?’ “—Bill Downing, treasurer, Massachusetts Cannabis Reform Coalition

medical marijuana in massachusetts

Photo by Scott M. Lacey

The first guy I call for some insight on the ballot initiative is Downing, who’s been involved with pro-marijuana groups since the late 1980s. The Massachusetts Cannabis Reform Coalition (MassCann) is the local affiliate of the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws, and I figured they were behind the initiative. I was wrong. They support the legalization and regulation of marijuana for adult use, but MassCann had no part in drafting the medical-marijuana bill. That work was done by representatives from the ACLU and the Massachusetts Patient Advocacy Alliance. When I finally connect with the writers of the ballot measure, they stop talking to me after I broach the topic of legalization. They aren’t interested in discussing anything beyond giving physicians the right to prescribe pot to their suffering patients. To MassCann, on the other hand, legalization is the whole point of the movement.

In early July, I pull up to Downing’s house in Reading. He comes out to greet me dressed in loose khakis, his mini ponytail tucked into the collar of his shirt. We sit by his pool, which is alive with tadpoles—he says he hasn’t cleaned it for the season yet—and talk pot. He’s married and has two teenage boys, but few people in the state have a longer history of pushing a pro-marijuana agenda than he does. MassCann has made slow progress over the years, including increasing the size of its annual Freedom Rally in September—which features “civil disobedience” smoke-ins on the Common—but things are now picking up speed. Downing feels like his time is finally coming.

If Massachusetts voters approve Question 3 on the November ballot, the state will permit up to 35 nonprofit “medical marijuana treatment centers” around the state. Those centers will be allowed to sell a 60-day supply of pot to anyone with a doctor’s note that’s been approved by the Massachusetts Department of Public Health. (The ballot question leaves it to the Department of Public Health to define what constitutes a 60-day supply.) Patients with a financial hardship or without access to a dispensary may also be allowed to grow an equivalent amount of pot.

And to discourage doctors from running the kinds of prescription mills that popped up in Colorado, the would-be law requires that a physician and a patient have a “bona fide” relationship. The state would also be authorized to conduct criminal-background checks on all dispensary agents, and it would be a misdemeanor to defraud the system—a felony if such fraud is for trafficking, sale, or distribution. Finally, all marijuana would need to be grown in an enclosed, locked facility to prevent theft. These are the signature Massachusetts measures meant to keep legal herb from ending up on the street. I have my doubts.

Keeping an eye on home growers, especially if there are a lot of them, isn’t really feasible. Even quantifying the total amount of pot grown is likely to be difficult, since different plants and growing techniques yield different results.

To Downing, though, the real concern is the black market that exists under our current drug laws, which is why he’s so pleased with the medical initiative. It’s the money from illegal sales, he tells me, that “goes into all those evil, evil things that we associate with international crime syndicates. So by taking all that marijuana out of the black market, we’re starving the crime syndicate of that money.”

That may be true, but I suspect that the real reason Downing likes the initiative is its broader implications. He believes that the state-by-state adoption of medical-marijuana laws is pushing the country toward a tipping point. If eight more states approve the laws, a majority will have done so. The government, he believes, will have to remove the federal ban on medical pot or risk looking foolish. And that will set the stage for MassCann’s true objective: legalization—the stuff of reggae songs and T-shirts on college campuses. Downing brings up the full-scale legalization bills in Colorado, Oregon, and Washington, saying, “If a state gets legalization, you know, everybody recognizes that the emperor is naked. When legalization happens in one state and the sky doesn’t fall, all the other states are going to say, ‘What are we, idiots?’”

ADVERTISMENT

  • http://www.TheRizzolution.com J.Riz

    Good article although I think Casey got a little lost while heading towards the conclusion. That’s what happens when you smoke while you write. The beginning was very informative but after a bunch of rambling and no real end to the story, I am left feeling like I took a seven page long hit from a bong. However, I do still plan on voting yes on question 3 when Tuesday, Nov. 6th rolls around.

    • Sean

      If you want to INVEST in marijuana for the elections, look at stock ticker MJNA. They sell CBD products, and their stock will explode if Washington (23 point lead in the polls), or Colorado (12 point lead in the polls) fully legalizes on the 6th of Nov!

  • Ben

    If marijuana isn’t solving your problems, stop smoking it. Just because it doesn’t “solve your problems” doesn’t mean you should forbid everyone else from using it. Your logic is completely un-American.

  • Jamie

    Thoughtful piece on the author’s conflicts with his own use of marijuana, but provides little insight on the medical cannabis debate in the Commonwealth. Perhaps Mr. Lyons is also now regretting his own fraud against the Colorado system, or recognizing that even with the passage of ballot initiative #3, as a recreational user he will face less legal liability in the black market than a dispensary.

    He might have done better to interview patients. He might have learned how pain and prescription drugs wreak havoc on relationships and careers, that even “non-narcotic” medications such as cymbalta, neurontin and tramadol can cause side effects including severe, even violent behavioral events, flat affect, loss of intellectual ability, and on and on. He might have met patients who lost out on children’s milestones due to illness or prescription drug effects, or who almost lost families from prescription narcotic addiction, or who could not hug their small children from pain, but who are able to function as parents with the help of cannabis.

    I’m sure that if Mr. Lyons spends some time thinking about the people this law is intended to benefit, rather than his own situation, he will vote in favor of Question #3 without ambivalence.

  • jway

    American taxpayers are being forced to pay $40 Billion a year for a prohibition that causes 10,000 brutal murders & 800,000 needless arrests every year, but which doesn’t even stop CHILDREN from getting marijuana.

    After seventy years of prohibition, it’s obvious that the federal marijuana prohibition causes FAR more harm than good and must END! Drug Dealers Don’t Card, Supermarkets Do.

  • Pot smoker

    What about the lungs? They weren’t even mentioned in the article. The nasty resin you see coating the insides of your pipe or bong is what you’re putting into your lungs. I’m a smoker who’s trying to quit because I can’t bear the thought of what I’m doing to my lungs.

  • F Michael Addams

    Recreational use of any psychotropic probably won’t help Mr. Lyons with his struggle and confusion defining his personal notion of “success “, whether personal or career. Not really “Lost in the Weeds “, just lost. Editor, help..

  • Katie

    I thought that this article was very insightful and I felt like I could’ve written half of it myself.
    I have loved smoking pot since I was 18, I am now 23. I recently gave up smoking for awhile because I felt that I should try destressing in other ways. I have honestly felt no difference except the fact that I am not stoned and in a comotose state every night before bed. I also want to point out that my high vanishes in two hours time. It does not last all night and is not a high that I experience all day after smoking one blunt. I do think that it can definately effect people in different ways and sometimes can be harmful to people that are already lazy and not motivated to get up and do something. I think that as alcohol effects people in different ways, pot does too. I choose pot over alcohol every day and feel that in the long run, pot is a no brainer choice. It has no long term side effects, does not cause death and is not addictive. Prescription pills are becoming more of a problem, however they are Legal and are now becoming easier to get due to FDA and doctor relationships. Cigarrettes have absolutely no good benefits and kill millions of people every year, but they are still Legal!!! Alcohol is legal and has killed millions of people each year. Marijuana has killed no one and causes no long term side effects but isnt legal.. hmm something seems wrong there.
    I think there must be some other explanation as to why marijuana is still illegal because I still can not comprehend why.
    I am going to emphasize again that I smoked a lot of pot over the years and am about to finish college. I think that lazy people that smoke pot are going to be lazy. Motivated people that smoke pot will be high, but still get up every day and go to work/school and live their lives to the fullest. I will be voting yes on question 3 because I feel that it is a safe and effective drug that can better the economy, the lives of people with cancer and illness and for those who need a quick stress relief after a hard days work and dont want to drink alcohol or smoke a disgusting cigarrette.

    • Aly-Kat

      EXCELLENT COMMENT, I agree with all of it 100%. Loving this part, and especially your last paragraph:
      “Cigarrettes have absolutely no good benefits and kill millions of people every year, but they are still Legal!!! Alcohol is legal and has killed millions of people each year. Marijuana has killed no one and causes no long term side effects but isnt legal.. hmm something seems wrong there.”

      I just cannot understand it either.

      I also agree that the lazy people that smoke will be lazy but the motivated people are still going to get up and do their thing–maybe they’ll be even more motivated with their enhanced mind, too.
      Hate to hear that it affects short-term memory, such as verbal recall, but excellent to know that it has NO long term effect and after a few weeks memory is back to normal…

  • MattMan

    I can’t believe how narrow minded this article was. Marijuana should be full-blown LEGAL, done and done. We’ve got two killers on the books, alcohol and tobacco, not to mention all the prescription drugs that kill people every day and I’m not even including the ones that get you high. This country is practically a facist state and then Lyons comes along with his awful article basically saying that we as a population should not be responsible for our own actions and behaviors. This is the real problem. Be PERSONALLY RESPONSIBLE for the things you do and have done. If you blew chances or stayed with a girl too long or can’t remember the final answer on Jeapordy… it’s your fault and besides that… it’s not that big of a deal. Don’t take life so seriously and realize that it doesn’t fit nicely into a time table. Live it, love it and protect our freedom. It’s disappearing faster than I ever thought possible and this law is a light at the end of the tunnel, that had been turned off due to budget cuts. GET FREE!!

  • Steve

    I found the article pulling me in as if Casey was going to bash pot, and in the end you can tell he is a smoker as he has these kind of rambling philosophical insights along the way leaving the reader drifting on their own thoughts about pot.

    Personally Casey and I are juxtasposed, philosophically. I didn’t smoke pot until I was 28, divorced and with a new friend. Has pot changed my life? Absolutely. Not only am I a very successful middle class family man with meaningful relationships – I have an escape that allows me to break free of those thoughts and self-doubts that hold us back. When I smoke I see my life for what it is without judgment and feel free to just be and to also create. After the high, and sometimes during the high I build my life in a direction I may not have if I was still holding on to anxiety and fear that pot dissolves so readily.

    Not to mention the relationships I have solidified in my life by sharing pot with those I love, it’s a bonding experience. It’s not artificial and it’s about as real as anything else in life. So to say that I have the life that smoking has created would be UN TRUE. I have the life that I created from places of clarity and peace of mind that smoking has afforded me along the way.

    Here’s to legalization!

  • sean

    This articel was great. I appreciate the personal narrative and agree that i often question my own use. I can say that I recently graduated magna cum laude from a philosophy program. I wrote all of my papers stoned at 8 am and received A’s on all of them. I find that marijuana increases my ability to stream thoughts in a coherent and cohesive way. The issue, though, comes when I’m about to leave the house and find my searching; not for my keys or phone, but for my dugout and lighter. What does this say about me? Am I one of the odd percentage of addicts? I have anxiety issues that stunt my social-hangout-and-have-conversation-ability, but if i get stoned first, I’m just happy to be there, whether i speak or not. But I still wonder that if I quit what would I be like and is it the better option? After 17 years of smoking, is it time? I’m just happy to know that someone my age is struggling with the implications of a sort of escapist lifestyle.

  • Zach

    I thought about posting a small inconsiderate comment suggesting that the author is projecting his own self-control and insecurity issues onto his pot use, but then I decided something else.

    Take every reference in the author’s life narrative about smoking weed and replace it with drinking alchohol.

    Where is that author now?

    Not writing for Boston Magazine, that’s for sure.

    And he wouldn’t have done anything illegal.

  • http://www.facebook.com/ambermoon1965 Amber Moon

    my town where I live says my racamtion is not real and it is he even stamped it with his own licence piss me off so there tellin me I can not grow my own or anything here they said the only way I can get it or use it is go all the way to boston I live 3 hours away wtf