Feature Article

Charlie in Charge

By John Gonzalez

Page 5 of 6

“I called every beat reporter,” Jacobs says. “I spoke to everybody. You know what they said? ‘Great. Thanks.’ Boom—they hung up. And when they were wrong, which I tried to forewarn them about, or inaccurate—don’t print ‘wrong’—when they were inaccurate, it was the Bruins’ doing, not their own. Talk about shy—I was pretty direct with everyone in that process.”
The truth, though, is that Jacobs is shy. You hear that over and over. From past and present employees. From reporters who cover the team. From a lot of people. But like most of us, Jacobs doesn’t relish hearing uncomfortable truths. He hates it, actually. When I mention it to him, that people think he’s reticent, he balks and gives me a list of people who have worked with and for him. He asks me to call them, saying they’ll show another side.

So I do. John Wentzell, president of the Garden and Delaware North–Boston, and Sean McGrail, president of NESN, both have glowing things to say about Jacobs, that he’s a proactive and involved leader. As does Rick Abramson, who has worked for the Jacobs family in various capacities for 41 years, and who is now president of Sportservice, the sports-stadium catering business that serves as Delaware North’s cornerstone. It’s clear Abramson is a big fan of the entire Jacobs clan: He gushes about how the patriarch allows him to run a half-billion-dollar company, and about going to Australia with Charlie’s brother, Lou. “See, the family is probably very tough for the media to understand,” Abramson says. “Charlie is very shy, and most of the Jacobses are shy. It just seems that….” He pauses, searching for the right words. “People think they’re not as out there as they should be.”

 

During our conversation in his office, Charlie and I are chatting cordially when the topic turns from the mundane to his dad. By most accounts, Jeremy Jacobs is a tough man to work for. Earlier, when I’d asked whether his father had given him a pep talk or a pat on the back when he began working for the team, Charlie smiled and said, “You don’t know Jeremy Jacobs,” later adding, “He’s a guy who expects results, and he wants them today.” Now, though, when his father comes up, he withdraws, looking away and fidgeting in his chair. Suspecting some sort of sneak attack, his defenses go on full alert. He’s all fierce loyalty. “My father is a huge figure in my life,” he says. As he sits there in a blue button-down shirt and khakis, his clothes suddenly look too big for him. “I’m a little cautious right here. I don’t know what direction you’re going. I’m a little nervous about how you’re gonna paint him…. I don’t want you to write a story that says, ‘Here’s Charlie Jacobs and here’s Jeremy Jacobs, the villain’—as he’s been painted so many times.” As he trails off, Charlie Jacobs’s true motive with the Bruins reveals itself. His goal has less to do with making the Bruins champions—that’s Chiarelli’s task—and more to do with protecting his father.

“The family legacy is important [to the Jacobses], and Charlie is really doing everything he can in Boston,” says Abramson, the Sportservice president and family friend. “Sure, he wants to please his father. I think anyone would. His father built this business up. His father took over this business when he was 28 years old. That’s a hard act to follow. The chairman, he isn’t going to hug you. But when he lets you do things, that’s the biggest hug he could give you.”

And what better way to return that embrace, to make Dad proud, than to take the heat that might otherwise be directed at Jeremy Jacobs? What better way than to be the fall guy?

I don’t care what you write about me, but don’t misrepresent my dad.

 

Go on to the next page for more...


 

Page | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | Next


Change text size
Print

Email

Write a comment
 
 

User comments

The Jacobs and Veterans
Posted by Anonymous | Nov. 28, 2007 at 6:28 AM
COMMENT:
A few years ago a friend of mine worked for a veterans organization. Jacobs wanted to honor veterans. A color guard was organized and a Medal of Honor winner. Night of the event, MOH winner given a limo. Ceremonies at the beginning. When it was over where did the MOH winner sit? On those bar stool seats and not a box or even regular seats. The color guard (many came from 2+ hours away)? They were shown the exit and Jacobs said they could buy their tickets if they wanted to see the game. Friend spent the next year apologizing to the MOH winner (and color guard) for Jacobs awful behavior. CHB is right, Jacobs IS Monty Burns. These people aren't Americans, they belong to the country of $$$. The only way these people can improve their name is by selling the team and leaving Boston. Until that happens the Bruins won't get a dime of my money. Funny because this is a great hockey town but the Jacobs have ruined it.
Charlie Jacobs
Posted by Anonymous | Nov. 28, 2007 at 9:37 AM
COMMENT:
Jacobs came across as very distant at the Bruins season ticket holder fan forum. He tried lamenting about losing to the "damn Canadiens" in Game 7 of the playoffs but it almost seemed he was more depressed about losing the extra concessions revenue, not the actual series. He's a probably a good and decent man but he's not cut out to be the face of an Original Six franchise. At least Neely and, to some degree, Don Sweeney have "Ice Cred" with the hardcore fans.
Good work
Posted by Anonymous | Nov. 28, 2007 at 12:49 PM
COMMENT:
First and foremost, I don't believe the first post. As someone who has had the opportunity to make requests of the Jacobs family for community events, they are extremely generous in giving out tickets to community organizations, firefighters, and kids. Second, cut the guy a break. The team has invested more in the last few years than any other franchise--on new coaches, players and front office. In addition, he brought in Neely and Sweeney to help boost the team's on ice performance. Where are the interviews with them? I had a chance to see them together and it appears that Cam thinks very highly of Jacobs, citing him as a key reason for his return to the Bruins. And, he and his wife have donated a ton of money to local charities including children's cancer causes and countless other organizations including youth hockey. Where is that part of the article. He is trying to do the right things. In my opinion, this wasn't a profile but a National Enquirer style story on someone who is try
The Story IS True
Posted by Anonymous | Nov. 28, 2007 at 1:39 PM
COMMENT:
In reply to "Good Work" I can verify the first story is true. John Gonzalez has my email address and I'll gladly give him the names of the people involved if he wishes to pursue this. The Jacobs record speaks for itself and professional hockey has become irrelevant in this area due solely to the Jacobs family. Remember the Yawkey's did a lot for local charities but in the end it couldn't hide the fact they were incompetent as owners, just like the Jacobs. Obviously the right thing to do would be for Jacobs to sell the team.
Cheap Shot at Charlie/Pathetic "Journalism"
Posted by John | Nov. 28, 2007 at 2:42 PM
COMMENT:
I attended that Season Ticket Holder gathering that Gonzalez refers to and I can tell you I walked away from the event feeling great about the state of the team and its leadership. Treating us like fellow members of a Corporate Board of Directors, Charlie outlined his vision for both the organization and the Hockey team and shared proprietary business data on the Economics of the Garden, the Hockey Club, and even the Concession Business (which BTW is a mediocre business with less expensive prices than Fenway and Gillette, facts Gonzalez conveniently ignored). 45 minutes after everyone left that meeting, Charlie was listening to 3 or 4 Season Ticket Holders' concerns and promising to take action. Charlie is the best LISTENER in Bostoin Sports. He promised us a new era of Transparency, including opening up the Building, for free, for all Practices and scrimmages throughout the season. No mention in the article of this. No other team in town does this. Gonzalez' cheap form of "gotcha i
Pathetic
Posted by Michelle | Nov. 28, 2007 at 4:03 PM
COMMENT:
www.pleasesellthebruins.com
"Give the guy a break"
Posted by Dave | Nov. 28, 2007 at 6:13 PM
COMMENT:
HAHAHA that rich. Lets give Jeremy Jacobs a break as he has single handedly ripped the heart out of the fans and franchise for over 30 years while making hundreds of millions at the expense of the team and its loyal fans. I see Jacobs has had some of his lame hired PR people post on here to try and give him some positive spin. This team will never win a Championship with the Jacobs family in Boston. Their goals are selling tickets and concessions (2nd highest prices in the league at last check) marketing the team to death with lame slogans "It's called Bruins" & "The Hub of Hockey" (4,000 STH left at last check) and barely squeaking into the playoffs to keep the few paying die hards that are left with some slim hope that this franchise may one day again see the second round of the Stanley Cup playoffs. This ownership is stale and is rotting from the head down. No ammount of window dressing or "goodwill gestures" will change that fact. Everything starts with ownership and you ne
"Give the guy a break"
Posted by Dave | Nov. 28, 2007 at 6:30 PM
COMMENT:
Everything starts with ownership and you need only to look at the RedSox, Patriots, and now the Celtics all of whom are under new ownership with "Championship Driven" owners to see that it all starts with ownership. and not a "Profit Driven" owner who determines a good season by the number of tickets and hotdogs sold. We can only hope that this stale and crusty ownership that makes up the Jacobs family will some day retreat back to Buffalo and give the Bruins back to its fans and the city of Boston.
Why is it the owners fault for a losing team?
Posted by Anonymous | Nov. 29, 2007 at 7:51 AM
COMMENT:
I am an avid hockey fan--have been for many years--and a sports fan in general. I listen to the "sell the team" mantra all the time and having lived in several big city markets, the owners don't have as much to do with winning as the coaches and the players. Now, I could jump on the bandwagon and blame ownership--but with the team spending in the last several years to the top and bringing in big time players--coaches--new GM. This is more of a commitment than other teams like the Lightning; the Blues. Look at the Sabres--almost bankrupt a few years ago because of mismanagment of ownership. As a die hard hockey fan--I look at the players, the play on the ice and the coaching, a heck of a lot more than I look at the ownership. As it relates to this story--he missed the real story--why hasn't the franchise been a winning one (a look at the players, the coaches, an honest look at the spending)--and what are it's plans for the future. The ownnership is really secondary. Get players to want
Site for the Fans
Posted by Anonymous | Nov. 29, 2007 at 11:54 AM
COMMENT:
www.mybostonbruins.com
Former B's employee agrees
Posted by Anonymous | Nov. 30, 2007 at 11:54 AM
COMMENT:
I worked for the organization and was there when Charlie came in and decided to half-heartedly get involved in just about every single phase of the organization. Without any research or strategic insight he'd make business decisions and undermine the hard work of people with expertise in a given field. It was so disheartening...seeing him disregard sound, smart ideas without any perspective beyond his own opinion. I'd cringe every time he "dropped in" to a meeting. My favorite Bruins story from when I worked there: At the Annual Wives' Carnival we would have 75-100 volunteers come in to help out for a full day's work (8 hours+). We'd get complimentary pizza, subs and drinks donated to feed these selfless folks, but one year we ran out of drinks. The easiest solution was to get a few cases of sodas and bottled drinks from Sports Service (on site) but that meant we'd have to pay about $12 per case. Chump change. Rather than spend $36 to hydrate our exhausted, thirsty, hard-working vol
Continued...
Posted by Anonymous | Nov. 30, 2007 at 12:23 PM
COMMENT:
unteers, I was told they could "drink from the water fountain."
Axe to Grind
Posted by Anonymous | Nov. 30, 2007 at 12:21 PM
COMMENT:
Wow. This article certainly paints Jacobs in a negative light. Knowing Charlie first hand, I think this article is just beyond belief. I find him to be a great guy who cares deeply about the Bruins and the people of the Commonwealth. How can this "in depth" story not and mention a word about all the positive work he has done in this city? Not a single mention of the Bruins Foundation or the youth hockey programs he has instituted. What gives?
Dear Charlie
Posted by Joseph | Dec. 2, 2007 at 5:37 AM
COMMENT:
I used to split season tickets with 3 other friends. We sat near center ice, loge seats, 12 rows up from the ice. We have been gone for 5 years now. Since then, we now own season tickets to the Boston Red Sox and I barter a few Sox tickets for a couple of Patriots games each year. I'll even consider swapping for a Celtics game. We have absolutely no regrets. If I want to see hockey in Boston, I go to see BU or BC. Good hockey, good program. I'd love to give you a piece of my mind in person at the Garden, but you won't get the chance unless you give me the tickets. I WILL NOT PAY A DIME TO SEE AN AVERAGE PRODUCT FROM A POORLY RUN ORGANIZATION LIKE YOURS.
Need Team Leadership
Posted by Michael | Dec. 2, 2007 at 5:37 AM
COMMENT:
I don't have any insight about Charlie personally, but I think the team has lacked leadership for the last 30+ years. When the Bruins had a good regular season and chance to to make a playoff run (pre-Charlie), rarely did they spend the capital to acquire extra players. And what happened when O'Connell traded Thornton to save his job? The Bruin ownership (Charlie was there) just sat there and let him make a horrible deal and just give away a quality asset. (Do you think Wyc would have sit still and let Ainge trade Pierce for a couple of mediocre backups?) The only way this gets better is if the Jacobs family recognizes they have done a poor job, puts a hockey expert they trust in place, and steps back. After 30 years, new slogans, empty promises and new faces just aren't enough. I grew up a Bruins fan, and they could still be my favorite team if I could bear to watch them. However, it is too sad to see what they've become.
The Truth Hurts
Posted by Anonymous | Dec. 2, 2007 at 5:52 AM
COMMENT:
The fact that the Jacobs try to burnish their image by donating to charities in Boston is immaterial to the state of the Bruins. Believe what your eyes see. The Bruins are irrelevant in this town and their demise is directly correlated to when this ownership took possession of this franchise. I grew up idolizing the Bobby Orr Bruins. I live in a town where kids have a reputation for being born with skates on. They grew up playing hockey in rinks that sprung up because of the Orr et al Bruins. I go in to each NHL season with anticipation and an open mind and am quickly disillusioned. The Bruins will not get a dime of my hard-earned money. I occasionally tune in on NESN because it is in my Comcast package otherwise I wouldn’t pay extra to watch. The Bruins are not “must watch TV” like the Celtics have become this season. “Thanks dad Jacobs” is to the Bruins what “Thanks dad Gaston” was to the Celtics and until there is an ownership change the results will be as they have been – unint
continued....
Posted by Anonymous | Dec. 2, 2007 at 6:04 AM
COMMENT:
. “Thanks dad Jacobs” is to the Bruins what “Thanks dad Gaston” was to the Celtics and until there is an ownership change the results will be as they have been – uninteresting and putrid.
The Truth Hurts
Posted by Anonymous | Dec. 2, 2007 at 6:04 AM
COMMENT:
. “Thanks dad Jacobs” is to the Bruins what “Thanks dad Gaston” was to the Celtics and until there is an ownership change the results will be as they have been – uninteresting and putrid.
why do they keep on
Posted by Anonymous | Dec. 2, 2007 at 6:58 AM
COMMENT:
I've always wondered why they retain ownership of the team since they have no knowledge of or interest in the game. Do they make any money owning the team? Is it possible that they gain some financial benefit from the team being bad and losing money?
Jacobs
Posted by Dan | Dec. 2, 2007 at 8:14 AM
COMMENT:
Imagine if the Red Sox were sold next year at the height of their popularity. Now imagine that the rookie contracts of Papelbon, Pedroia, and Ellsbury were all set to expire, and rather than pay them their worth the new owners let them go, and we are helpless as we watch them go on to All Star careers in other Cities. That has been what the Bruins under the Jacobs era has been in a nut shell. I watched the opening ceremonies of the NHL All Star game this year and just sadly shook my head watching ex-Bruins after ex-Beuin take the ice. Money has never been the problem. Jacobs has the same deal as Steinbrenner (tickets, concessions, parking,TV) plus he gets it from the Celtics to! Being a Bruins fan is similar to being a Cuban refugee, just waiting for Castro to die. Unfortunatly in this case he has a Son.
we are the blackhawks
Posted by Anonymous | Dec. 2, 2007 at 8:53 AM
COMMENT:
Look at the Chicago Blackhawks. I think I read somewhere the AHL team draws more than they do! How many championships would the Red Sox have one if Harrington and Duquette were still in charge. Lets get local and give it up to people who care.
Sad
Posted by Used to | Dec. 2, 2007 at 10:38 AM
COMMENT:
I grew up in the latter "heyday" of the Bruins, the late '80s and early '90s. At that time, they were just as popular as the Sox. One of my greatest memories is going to Game 3 of the '88 playoffs against the Canadiens and seeing the Bruins eek out a 2-0 win. I was 12 years old, and it left a lasting impression on me. Now I go to the "Garden" and stare at the expanse of empty seats, even at Canadiens games, and it makes me sad. No one is to blame for this besides JEREMY JACOBS. Noone. He personally sucked the life out of this great hockey city to line his own pockets.
Fans Need to Lie if They'd Like to Win
Posted by Anonymous | Dec. 2, 2007 at 11:20 AM
COMMENT:
Nobody wants to be disgraced, and Jeremy Jacobs will never sell the team in disgrace. Bring signs to the games that applaud Jacobs and absolve him of responsibility for the state of the franchise. Plead with ownership not to sell the team. As a life long Bruins fan (who would never pay to see them play these days), the current strategy of honesty simply doesn't work to improve situation. Appeal to their ego, give ownership a way out, and if you've got a couple hundred million dollars to spare buy the team for the people of Boston. Thanks to Grousbeck et al for saving the Celtics.
Since I posted this in the wrong spot,lol
Posted by Anonymous | Dec. 2, 2007 at 2:53 PM
COMMENT:
First off, is any of this news? Maybe to those that haven't followed the team in years, but to fans none of this is. I have a hard time with you saying "The Bruins have gotten off to a decent start this year. But even as the team is playing better (thanks in large part to Chiarelli, whom Jacobs hired as general manager before last season)" Chiarelli hired an awful coach in Lewis, at least he was smart enough to admit that mistake and hired Julien as his replacement. Many of the current issues with the B's are due to Chiarelli's inability to judge talent and to hit the panic button just like his predecessor OC did. Boyes was a huge mistake, letting Toivoinen go as he sat and watched Lewis let him rot was his mistake. Bringing in Fernandez, giving away a top prospect plus a draft pick was his mistake. He added an overpaid goalie with injury issues, has had his character questioned in the past and is making $4mil + is his mistake. Not many can get fleeced even when they have al
pt 2
Posted by Anonymous | Dec. 2, 2007 at 2:58 PM
COMMENT:
Not many can get fleeced even when they have all of the leverage, Chiarelli managed to do just that. How many of these kids that have been called up are his draft picks? He felt comfortable getting rid of most of who their hands in one of the few bright spots in this organization, its ability to draft some good players, especially ones in the later rounds. Everyone knows the Jacobs' don't know hockey, everyone could see that Charlie is a weasel. Chia is pressing the buttons and you might as well have Alexander Haig at the helm. Pray that Neely can keep his cool and deal with the bureaucracy and that our "new and improved" management can not screw this up, again. Harry was Harry, but Harry knew that game and knew who to trust when making trades if he wasn't familiar with the players. Harry was a hockey man, I complained about him not wanting to loosen the purse strings just like everyone else did. We should have won with him and didn't because of $$, not because he didn
Dismayed by tone of article on C Jacobs
Posted by William | Dec. 2, 2007 at 3:32 PM
COMMENT:
I first met Charlie some 15 yr ago. We had mutual friends and eventually ended up playing on an entry-level hockey team together. When we first met he could barely stand on skates. Over the course of that season his love of the game grew, and grew true. I remember very clearly him telling me, sincerely, he loved the game and dreamed of one day leading the Bruins - as an executive and a lover of the game. It was the early 90's. As the article states, he left for CA for a number of years, and we we lost touch. Upon his return to Boston he reached out to me. Why ? He wanted to know if he could join up with me to play a little hockey again. Many years had passed since I had last seen Charlie on skates. I was astounded to see that he now made me look like a bag of pucks - the kid could skate like the wind. Because he LOVED playing and had been playing all those years in CA. He likely still does - hence his great conditioning, or what the author recklessly referred to as being "
In desperate need of new ownership
Posted by Anonymous | Dec. 2, 2007 at 5:38 PM
COMMENT:
Nothing is going to change here until a new ownership takes over. This stagnant and putrid ownership is more concerned with profits and how the come off PR wise then actually winning a Stanley Cup. I have not been to a game in 4 years and I used to attend all the time. They are now down to 4,000 STH according to Mr. Dupont and falling. Mr. Burns can keep his building and keep his precious concesions, JUST SELL THE FREAKIN TEAM to an ownership who has a clue. All we have here is a bunch of low paid yes men who bow down to JJ and Chucie both of whom are clueless about running a succesful franchise.
Hachet Job Not Warranted
Posted by Section | Dec. 2, 2007 at 9:07 PM
COMMENT:
Charlie Jacobs is doing his best to make Bruins tickets holders feel that they are getting value for their dollar. Food at the Garden is cheaper than Fenway, the Bruins have arranged discounted parking for season ticket holders, and the team is competitive. The team is competitive on ice. They need better marketing. No question. But the Boston Mag article was unfair. Jacobs is good for the Bs. And their fans.
Too late
Posted by Anonymous | Dec. 2, 2007 at 9:42 PM
COMMENT:
Great article. Anyone who is a FORMER die hard of the Bruins can see what role they had for Charlie and Cam. Too little too late-the horse has already left the barn.
Bruins failing all over New England
Posted by Anonymous | Dec. 2, 2007 at 9:42 PM
COMMENT:
Having grown up in Boston following the Bruins imagine how good it was to hear they would be practicing in my new hometown,Waterbury Vermont, for training camp. Saturday morning rolls around and low and behold no Bruins, practice called off for a day of rest. Not unreasonable until I read in the paper that most of the team was seen in a local Bar until 2am that morning. For a team trying build back it's fan base an loyalty shouldn't they be doing the same for all their fans? Jeremy Jacobs or Charlie Jacobs equals same old story, show me the money and don't make me look bad.
Who cares?
Posted by Anonymous | Dec. 2, 2007 at 9:53 PM
COMMENT:
Haven't watched a game in 12-13 yrs!!!!!!!!!
Winning changes everything
Posted by Anonymous | Dec. 3, 2007 at 12:36 AM
COMMENT:
All the Bruins need is one season where they make the Eastern Finals and everyone in Boston will change their tune. Until a few months ago, the new Celtics ownership was as despised in this town as their predecessors. Right now, the Jacobs actually aren't the bigger issue. The entire NHL is one big mess. Loud stock cars driving in circles are more popular in this country than hockey. Until the sport catches on again, the Bruins' woes are secondary.
Too bad for the kids
Posted by Anonymous | Dec. 3, 2007 at 12:19 AM
COMMENT:
My radio tuned to the games, I remember vividly "playing" for the Bruins in the back room (where no one could hear me) with my Sherwood and a tennis ball. Oh, the fun I had. I swear, I willed the B’s to victory one night. It was an honor to take the ice with the likes of Orr, Johnny B, Hodge, O'Reilly, and the rest through the years. The Bruins were the focus of every kid in my neighborhood. It was just a matter of time, we thought, before they started winning like the Celts. We were believers, and we went to the Garden whenever we could. And then we stopped going. And then we stopped watching them on TV. And then we stopped following them in the paper. We lost interest. It's sad. The Pats started something big around here when they became relevant and important. The Sox figured it out too, and moved to reward the faithful with sweet success. And now the Celtics organization has acted to re-engage its ancient fan-base. Truth be told, the Bruins might just have the most
Too bad for the kids (continued)
Posted by Anonymous | Dec. 3, 2007 at 1:02 AM
COMMENT:
... the Bruins might just have the most intense fans of all the local teams, but we have become so disaffected. Make the B's matter again. Please spend some money so that it isn't just about the money anymore. I'd be willing to splurge to bring my boys to a game if I believed the organization really wanted to hang some banners from the rafters.
Lets Make Sense Here
Posted by Anonymous | Dec. 3, 2007 at 4:34 PM
COMMENT:
Why would he ever sell the team? Who would buy it without also owning the building, and concessions. The Jacob's could give the tickets away for free and still make a killing on the food. I know one thing for sure, they should send the Celtics and extra large fruit basket this Christmas for all the food, beer, wine and liqor hungry fans they are stuffing into the Jacobs Christamas stockings. I have worked there for over 10 years in concessions and if Charlie thinks HE"S hearing it then he should spend a season behind a food counter. These fans have had enough. I won't even get into the general working atmosphere that is currently being created by this new management team. In closing I would like to thank all of the x-Bruins fans for your years of dedication and although it affects me financially do us both a favor.......go to the movies!!!
Re: Lets make sense here
Posted by Anonymous | Dec. 3, 2007 at 5:31 PM
COMMENT:
"Who would buy it without also owning the building, and concessions"........ Someone recently bought the Celtics right? They dont own the building or concessions. If Jacobs finally decided to sell people would be lined up around the block to buy this team. Jacobs is holding the team hostage plain and simple. He finally got his cap and now he is nickle and diming with personel. He hired a rookie GM and fired have the hockey op staff over the last 2 years. A leopard doesnt change his spots. Now we have to suffer through Charlies imcompetence.
Who would buy them.........
Posted by Anonymous | Dec. 3, 2007 at 6:18 PM
COMMENT:
Who would buy them.........The Celtics have a stronger fan base and a much more lucrative television contract. Not to metion that they play at the Garden virtually rent free. If someone bought the Bruins without owning at least the concessions it would be impossible to turn a profit. If you only owned the team you would depend solely on ticket revenue and tv money to survive, sorry but neither of those items would be enough at this time. A new owner would have to operate at a loss and pray that he turns the team around in a short period of time in order to put enough fanny's in the seats to make money. Now if you can add the concessions....or the revenue that owning the building can generate....different story....thus no concessions, no building....no new owners!!
There is Nothing the Jacobs Can Do
Posted by Anonymous | Dec. 5, 2007 at 8:47 AM
COMMENT:
The only thing that would appease me is for this team to be sold. Or have the entire team move to another city much like the Cleveland Browns did AND LEAVE THE NAME. I followed this team since 67 and there is nothing left for me to give. I gave up buying tickets 20 years ago, but until recently watched every game on NESN...this team could go on to the Stanley Cup finals and I could care less BECAUSE OF THIS OWNERSHIP. I hope Cam Neely has other motives for working for this franchise and that is for him and others, perhaps Orr, Esposito, McKenzie et als., to negotiate buying this team. Then, we could send these rogues back to Buffalo where they belong and they can take their "Harvard" connection with them.
Management Counts
Posted by Brule | Dec. 10, 2007 at 10:05 AM
COMMENT:
If you don't think that management counts, look at the Blackhawks. Previously in even worse shape than the Bruins, the franchise is turned 180 degrees since the death of Bill Wirtz. In rapid order, son Rocky fired Bob Pulford, put more home games on TV and hired John McDonough, the brains behind making the Cubs one of baseball's most popular franchises, as president. He's combining a new outlook with the allure of the old Hull-Mikita-Tony O. days. I attend a Bruins-Canadiens game last March and was amazed at how low this franchise had fallen. Charlie should take a look at what Rocky is doing here and get moving!
C Jacobs in charge
Posted by Anonymous | Dec. 10, 2007 at 11:41 AM
COMMENT:
Was stunned by how accurate the writer gets this story. As an employee at the Garden we had high hopes for when Charlie Jacobs came to Boston but it has become a disaster. Hiring unqualified suck ups, paying all kinds of money to a high priced PR firm who essentially tells them what they want to hear, hand picking a GM to run the hockey team without a personality and allowing good person after good person to leave are just some of what Charlie has done since arriving. Since this story came out there is an obvious change in Charlie's manner, which tells you all you need to know.
Hmmm... now they're winning!
Posted by Anonymous | Dec. 11, 2007 at 12:34 AM
COMMENT:
OK, now what? The Bruins have the 2nd best record in the East. What if they keep winning? What if they end up truly competitive? Is Jacobs a failure then? In a hard salary cap league, is he not doing all he can? I agree with ALL of the criticisms on that family and the organization pre-salary cap. But, post-cap, they've started to recover from their initial mistakes. The issue will be whether they get teh chance to do anything about it.
It Doesn't Matter
Posted by Anonymous | Dec. 11, 2007 at 3:44 PM
COMMENT:
How many games the Bruins win in the short term - the organization is a disgrace. Got tickets from work and there are no fans there - just empty suits. Jacob's is wrong for this great city and no one talks about the Bruins on the street anymore - just BU or BC hockey. Charlie isn't welcomed in this city and neither is his grumpy old man. Pathetic pathway to obscurity and the only people who care are the ex-fans.
Don't hate the Bruins
Posted by Anonymous | Dec. 11, 2007 at 5:38 PM
COMMENT:
The Jacobs family should sell the Bruins. But should I hate the GM who has inhearated the post lock out disaster? Should I hate the coach who is doing a great job? What about Tim Thomas should I boo him as well. As terrible as the jacobs family is they have put togeather a pretty good young team. Milan = terry
Prove you love the game; Sell the concession business
Posted by Anonymous | Dec. 11, 2007 at 7:03 PM
COMMENT:
So it is pretty clear that the Jacobs won't sell the team. The only other way they could prove they are "die hard" owners is to sell the concession business or use a non-Jacob vendor. This would remove any argument that money is the sole goal for this ownership group. Until then, the family will continue to take a beating.
Neely hope
Posted by d | Dec. 12, 2007 at 6:56 AM
COMMENT:
"Cam hasn’t worked for an NHL franchise before." is that a joke? i think being a member of a team and getting paid counts, doesn't it? neely has plenty of experience.
Ownership
Posted by Anonymous | Dec. 12, 2007 at 7:56 AM
COMMENT:
Someone already mentioned it, but I'd like to talk about the Blackhawks. Ownership might not help win, but it can certainly help a team lose. Wirtz dying was the best thing that ever happened to the Blackhawks. I'm still not going to the games because I am/was a B's fan, and the tickets and concessions are still outrtageous, but Chicago is beginning to care again. Until the Bruins get their act together, and I'm not talking about winning a few games, I'm sticking with Hockey East.
Same old story
Posted by Anonymous | Dec. 12, 2007 at 10:00 AM
COMMENT:
I (and I think most people) have never taken Charlie seriously and this article only proves the point. I love how when asked about plans to improve the franchise they always talk about improvements to the Garden. Do they not realize fans are willing to sacrafice a few megapixels on the jumbotron if they can have a winning team. Then again, it's a lot easier for an absentee owenr in Buffalo to install a new elevator in the building than invest in talent that will product a winner...
The Big "Bad" Bruins
Posted by Anonymous | Dec. 12, 2007 at 10:22 AM
COMMENT:
I used to be one of those die-hard Bruins fans. Now I've got one word for how I feel about this hockey team: "Irrelevant". And yes, i too believe it's due entirely to current ownership.
Feel Your Pain
Posted by Ranger Fan | Dec. 12, 2007 at 11:09 AM
COMMENT:
Behind the NY Rangers, I love the Bruins, and the current nitwits running this team should be thrown in Boston Harbor. If I was a season ticket holder, I would have started a boycott of the August town hall event. See what happens when 10 people show up. The Rangers, for all their effed up signings, poor drafts, and expensive tickets, at least did so trying to win. I feel sorry for all my hockey loving friends in New England.
US Equestrian team member
Posted by Anonymous | Dec. 12, 2007 at 11:21 AM
COMMENT:
That's funny.
STOP LIVING IN THE PAST!
Posted by Anonymous | Dec. 12, 2007 at 1:45 PM
COMMENT:
Embrace the new team. The Jacobs family might not be stellar owners, SO WHAT? This is a sports team. Tickets are available for 10$, tickets for other teams in the city are insane. Go support the players. They have been playing well. Give them fans to play well for, to feel connected to when they're on the road, so they know that people care about the outcome of the game. The owner of the team is not nearly as important as the coach and players so give them some credit.
Standings as of 12/13...
Posted by Whaler | Dec. 13, 2007 at 10:27 AM
COMMENT:
Eastern Conference Team GP Pts 1. * Ottawa 29 41 2. * New Jersey 30 35 3. * Carolina 32 35 4. Boston 30 37 5. NY Rangers 31 35 6. Philadelphia 28 34 7. Montreal 30 33 8. Pittsburgh 30 32 9. Toronto 31 32 10. Tampa Bay 31 31 11. NY Islanders 29 30 12. Buffalo 29 29 13. Atlanta 30 29 14. Florida 30 28 15. Washington 31 26
WHATEVER
Posted by Anonymous | Dec. 13, 2007 at 12:06 PM
COMMENT:
This family absolutely spoiled a fine hockey town. The NHL has its woes, yes. But lets not let this sorry ownership hide behind that. The thing that gets me with them is its always one in, one out...a revolving door. They were taking bows and wanted accolades for signing Chara. I was like, OK....why didn't you sign Chara and keep guys like Gonchar, Thorton, Samsonsov, etc.? How would it be if the PATS signed Moss but let Brady go...the Bruins never build the team right here. Waste of our time and money until we get a new owner. 33 years of failure, what else do you need to know????
Go Sabres!
Posted by James | Dec. 13, 2007 at 6:38 PM
COMMENT:
This thread reminds me of the Sabres fans who are still longing to return to the days that Buffalo was run by the late/great Seymour Knox; the same fans whose kids today are still pissed at Seymour's brother Northrop for selling the team to Adelphia in the 90's, only to see the Adelphia family get locked up for embezzling two billion, with a b, dollars from the company (you don't know how good you have it with the support you have from the Jacobs). On top of all of this - we were in last place in 2002 - and guess who was still a die-hard, loyal fan cheering Buffalo's players, coaches, and even the administration on, I was. And ever since 2005, when we had our best season in 20 years, the crying from our own fairweather fans, and criticism of our administrative team has practically stopped; not even the 30,000 fans who signed a petition to scrap the new logo or even the shareholders that lost their investment in Adelphia are bitching any more because everyone loves a winner.
My point
Posted by James | Dec. 13, 2007 at 7:43 PM
COMMENT:
Boston IS a great franchise, and if you're a fan, you're a fan (win or lose). Beyond that, I knew Charlie growing up, and he always showed up to play wearing that damn Bruins Jersey. How ironic considering the crap on this thread and in this article (which by the way, if I were Charlie, I would have done to Gonzolez what Buffalo's Dominik Hasek did to Buffalo News Columnist Jim Kelley: look it up folks). Seriously, Charlie, having lived in Boston for a year after college, all I can offer you is a quote from comedian Fred Allen, "I have just returned from Boston. It is the only thing to do if you find yourself up there."
One thing we've learned
Posted by Anonymous | Dec. 14, 2007 at 9:46 AM
COMMENT:
The only people who defend Charlie Jacobs are his friends and hangers-on. Every single pro-Jacobs post here has been followed by "I know him personally" or "I grew up with him" or "I am his friend", which - sorry folks - makes your opinions a) biased and b) even more laughable, like when Charlie pointed Gonzalez to an employee of 41 years and a friend of his father's to get positive feedback on him. When 100% of the general population thinks that someone is a bad person or a failure, THAT PERSON IS DOING SOMETHING WRONG. It doesn't matter how many of his friends (ironic how many of his friends just happened to take the time to post!) like him - they're SUPPOSED to like him. They're his FRIENDS. We? We're just his customers, and we hate him like bitter death.
Sheep
Posted by Anonymous | Dec. 14, 2007 at 2:01 PM
COMMENT:
Ya Hastie, if Boston "IS a great franchise" why would this article or thread exist in the first place? Correction: it WAS a great franchise. Yeah enough with the "I know Charlie Jacobs" bit. I knew him too, played hockey with him when he was learning like 12 years ago. Doesn't change the fact that for years the organization has vastly overcharged its fan base for a sub par product and then played the blame game year after year, firing coaches and giving away good players. Its fans like you (baaa-baa) sheep who defend this sorry ownership and give them something to try and justify their shrewd ways. Nice going.
Well Said Hastie
Posted by Jonathan | Dec. 14, 2007 at 2:28 PM
COMMENT:
It's not fair that the accused is not protected from adverse publicity whilst the accuser is guaranteed anonymity, whatever the verdict.
Glad I fired that team after 35 years of loyalty
Posted by Brian | Dec. 14, 2007 at 9:43 PM
COMMENT:
Not anywhere near Boston (live in Vancouver) but became a fan back in 1970 thanx to Orr et al. The killer for me was the McSorley incident and the whole trading away of talent that sort of started for me with the Jason Allison deal. I just could not take it anymore. Maybe I'm not loyal but it's sort of freeing not getting worked up about series vs. the Habs and cursing the Mike McPhees of the world (thank you, Cam Neely for ending the curse in 1988). All I can say is my heart is with B's fans everywhere but I am not coming back until Jacobs is gone.
same story, different city
Posted by James | Dec. 16, 2007 at 2:58 AM
COMMENT:
Dragging myself out of bed to take my nephews to the rink and have to say I heard the same kind of political pledge made by a dozen guys in Buffalo in the 90's and in '02 - and they were all sitting next to me in '05. In the end, nothing matters but the love of the game.
Season Ticket Holder
Posted by Joe | Dec. 17, 2007 at 9:32 AM
COMMENT:
The Bruins have spent up to the salary cap. Because Manny Fernandez and Patrice Bergeron look to be out for the season, NHL rules allow them to now go over the cap if they choose. I'm very interested in seeing if the team will take on an expensive player (probably in the last year of his contract from a team that's dumping salary at the tradeline) and make an extra financial push for the playoffs.
in charge
Posted by Anonymous | Dec. 19, 2007 at 12:34 PM
COMMENT:
Explain to me why the bruins would hirer a Gm like the one they did, just because you went to Harvard doesnt mean you know how to run a nhl hockey team. You spend more time speaking with your old team than your new team. your a arrogant person that has no idea how to run a nhl team. Cut the cord, I think Charlie hired Sir Peter because he's a yes man. To hand cuff the team with the $7 million dollar mistake, O ya he played for the old team,and please dont blame Jeff for that one everybody knows who made the call on that one. How many players were on the nhl roster last year and this year.
Horrible team...who cares
Posted by Notsukin | Dec. 25, 2007 at 9:32 PM
COMMENT:
Bill Simmons of ESPN said to check out this article on his site to confirm that those of us tuning out the Bruins are doing the right thing. I grew up watching Orr, Sanderson, Hodge, Cheevers, etc...loved Ratelle, Park, O'Reilly, Gilbert, Middleton...same feelings with Neely, Ray, Oates...there was hope, excitement...always the feeling that this could be the year.....we were competitive....then letting Allison go, The strike fiasco...letting Thornton go....I gave up and actually wish that the Bruins continue their poor performance long enough to force the Jacobs clan out of town. This team doesn't matter...in effect their incredibly inept handling during the strike and the aftermath left us with no more than an expansion team...a bunch of players that I don't know and don't care to. I take my 6 yr old son to watch college hockey games now. Also..the pro "Charlie" posts are an absolute joke...I can see Charlie sitting up late at nite typing the responses on his defence wondering why
Horrible team who cares
Posted by Notsukin | Dec. 25, 2007 at 10:01 PM
COMMENT:
wondering why the "common" fans of Boston can't recognize his abilities, talents, passion for the Bruins, and most of all what a great guy he is...a real mans man. Why his friends...Biff and others and Dad's associates mostly (Dale Arnold most likely the biggest Jacobs and Bruins apologist in Boston who defended the Thornton trade when it happened)certainly defend him here. "He bleeds Bruins blood...why he even learned to skate by golly...instead of polo...even wears a Bruins jacket and jersey...can't you see how good he is for the team?" WHAT A JOKE....I WILL NEVER GO TO A BRUINS GAME AGAIN..MY FATHER WILL NOT GO UNLESS IT'S FREE (he said he would never put a nickel into the Jacobs family bank account). You know that if management was doing the right thing there would be more former Bruins players involved....Neely won't stick around with this group...not once he see's he's being used by them as a marketing gimmick. God Bless the SOX/PATS/CELTICS...THE BRUINS ARE HORRIBLE
WELL SAID HASTIE...SEE YOU DOWN AT THE CLUB LATER
Posted by Notsukin | Dec. 25, 2007 at 10:10 PM
COMMENT:
My god...if I googe the names James Hastie, Jonathan King, John Mooney, William Bagshaw will I get the board members for Delaware North? Maybe your friends from Skull and Bones?? What a PR nightmare for you having these stiff SOBS defend you with their pompous drivel. Charlie...these guys are doing you no favors...better get them to stop jumping to your defense and have them stick to their trust funds instead of helping you here. It is obvious you are all out of touch. Remember that wonderful childrens book....The emperor wore no clothes??
Season Ticket Holder
Posted by Joe | Dec. 29, 2007 at 5:22 AM
COMMENT:
Charlie's first big public decision was the hiring of Chiarelli. Chiarelli's decisions have been giving big bucks to Chara (bad move)and Savard (good move), the hiring of Dave Lewis (awful move), the trading of Brad Boyes (leaning towrads bad move), the trading of Stuart (got decent value for him), the firing of Lewis (good move, albeit correcting an atrocious mistake) and the hiring of Julien (looks to be a good move). My memory is a bit hazy, but if Chiarelli is the guy that extended Glen Murray, that's a real bad move. Now the team is free-falling out of the playoff picture and it is up to Chiarelli to right the ship. I'd love to see the team spend more money with salary cap relief available because of their long-term injuries, but that ultimately would be ownership's call. If Chiarelli runs things into the ground, there will clearly be blood on Jacobs's hands. Conversely, if things improve, abstract credit must go the way of the front office/ownership.
trust fund
Posted by James | Dec. 31, 2007 at 10:11 AM
COMMENT:
now that is funny; I wish.
WHEN!!??
Posted by Anonymous | Jan. 4, 2008 at 8:50 AM
COMMENT:
I see all of this talk about how introverted and shy Charlie is, But I don't really see anything along the lines of getting results. I'd like to know if the "family" REALLY wants the team to succeed. I'd like to see some talk or even speculation, that would just ease the minds of the fans, and then actions to back it up. that is the real bottom line here. We really don't need a family history. Although I do enjoy this article because it does point out a lot of problems as far as the organization's motivation and drive.
Manny Fernandez
Posted by Anonymous | Jan. 4, 2008 at 4:55 PM
COMMENT:
Dont forget Chiarellis brilliant move of trading the young prospect Peter Kalus to the Wild for a 32 year old injury prone goaltender with attitude problems who is making $9.25 MILLION OVER 2 YEARS!!! Does Chiarelli understand what a salary cap is? He is TERRIBLE at that aspect of his job.
This organization is a LAUGHINGSTOCK
Posted by Anonymous | Mar. 9, 2008 at 9:20 AM
COMMENT:
Have you seen the prices these neanderthals are asking for to see a borderline playoff team who will be one and done in the playoffs if they even make it! Jacobs takes advantage, then takes advantage some more and then when he is done doing that he will pick your pocket as you exit the building. Never again will I spend a dime at that glorified public library. It warms my heart to see the thousands of empty seats night after night. I love the Bruins and the game of hockey but there is not an ownership or person I loathe more then Jacobs and his evil empire which is based purely on deceit.
dear future owner(s)
Posted by Anonymous | Jul. 20, 2008 at 9:59 AM
COMMENT:
The day the team is sold I will be in line to buy season tickets. I am one of dozens of people I know well that will do the same. Your season ticket base will triple year one . Until then WE WILL STAY HOME.
This ownership is about 1 thing, PROFITS.
Posted by Ralph | Aug. 30, 2008 at 4:23 PM
COMMENT:
The Bruins were in the top 3 for ticket and concession prices the last 2 seasons, that is a complete and total joke with the "product" (as Jacobs so warmly puts it) that is given to us. This ownership has no vision and more importantly no drive to actually win a Championship. Enough with "the kids are our future" we have been sold that same bill of goods every single offseason for the past 15 years and nothing ever changes.
Boycott the Garden and All Events
Posted by Anonymous | Sep. 5, 2008 at 5:17 PM
COMMENT:
I am a former die hard Bruins fan who hasn't stepped in the Fleet/BN Garden in 10 years. Will never go to a concert, Beanpot or Celtics game as long as the Jacobs family owns the building and the Bruins. Proud to say Jacobs hasn't seen a penny of my money in over a decade. Michael Felger is 100% correct in calling JJ a thief. It wasn't that long ago the Bruins owned this town. JJ took all that away from us. Somewhere Mike Ilitch is sipping champagne from the Cup laughing all the way to the bank.

Post a comment

(* = required field.)
  • Please check to make sure that your referer is not blocked.


Subject line of your comment*
Your comments (200 words max)*
Email*
First name*
Last Name*
Enter the code shown below.
Visual CAPTCHA
This helps prevent automated form submissions.
Boston Buzzworthy

Fresh Fall Libations

Guide to tasty signature cocktails for fall.
 
 

Dental Profiles

Keep your mouth happy and your body healthy. Find Boston’s finest dentists here.