Boston Magazine |
Liberal Criticism
Candidate Romney is just the latest self-serving conservative pol to use Massachusetts—the bluest of blue states—as a prop for his own advancement. But his barbs carry unwelcome truth.
By Jon Keller
Why has Mitt Romney’s approval rating in Massachusetts fallen through the basement?
Continuing anger over the way Romney uses his home state as a national political punch line, for one thing. Being a conservative Republican here, he loves to tell presidential campaign audiences, was like “being a cattle rancher at a vegetarian convention,” a joke that echoes the more serious indictment of the state’s all-blue political culture he threw at Ted Kennedy during their 1994 Senate showdown. “I was in Dorchester not long ago,” snapped Romney. “Someone said, ‘This is Kennedy country,’ and they handed a sign to me in front of my face. And I looked around and I saw boarded-up buildings, and I saw jobs leaving, and I said, ‘It looks like it.’”
Kennedy country. The political establishment was outraged. Romney was bluntly deriding the core political identity of not just the Kennedy family, but an entire generation of Democrats. Kennedy country. Uttered with the same unvarnished contempt a Massachusetts Democrat would typically reserve for references to Ronald Reagan or George W. Bush.
But looking around Massachusetts today, the unvarnished truth is that Romney’s 13-year-old point still stands, and lends credence to his current mockery. Kennedy country: working-class neighborhoods endowed with equal rights and opportunity courtesy of an enlightened, activist government. America made “livable.” That’s the vision so many boomers inherited from the Kennedy family. But the Kennedys’ most important vow—of a government in touch with and devoted to the working classes and the poor, delivering on its commitment to improve their lives and enhance their opportunities—has turned out to be a broken promise.
More than a decade after Romney gave his caustic take on the Kennedy legacy, the north Dorchester neighborhood where he was heckled by Kennedy partisans is still plagued by abandoned buildings and joblessness. Drug abuse and its criminal side effects are rampant. After rave reviews for Boston’s anticrime “miracle” programs during the 1990s, violent street crime is once again soaring in north Dorchester and other poor city neighborhoods. In Holyoke, the impoverished old mill city in the state’s chronically depressed western region that hosted that infamous Kennedy/Romney debate, more than half the children, most of them Puerto Rican immigrants, live below the poverty line. Statewide, white-collar job growth has been incremental during a time of robust national economic recovery; good blue-collar jobs, especially in the vanishing manufacturing sector, are even scarcer. In recent years Massachusetts has twice scored an unwanted distinction: the only state in the nation to lose net population, as mobile residents vote with their feet on the state’s sky-high cost of living, dwindling opportunities, and deteriorating quality of life. The Democrats from Ted Kennedy on down who’ve had near-total control of the state for three decades talk a big game about their vision of a better deal for the downtrodden. But their abysmal track record tells a different tale.
Change text size |
Print |
Email |
Write a comment |







Posted by Anonymous | Nov. 27, 2007 at 4:47 PM