LIKE BOSTON MAGAZINE!
Subscribe to Boston Magazine
 
 
 
 

Dispatch: Sex and the School District

Desperate to catapult its schools into the upper ranks, Arlington brought in a savvy businessman to be its superintendent. But then came the threats, and the raunchy e-mails, and the scandal that showed just how divided the town really is.

October 2009
Text Size: A | A | A
 
Illustration by Heather Burke.

In 2004, when the Arlington school committee went looking for a new superintendent, it realized it had a momentous opportunity. The reputation of the town's schools had been slowly improving for decades, but now ambitious parents could finally hire a change agent from beyond the academic bureaucracy, somebody who could finish the transformation of the school system from, as they said, "good to great." The man they settled on was Nate Levenson, a 44-year-old with a Harvard M.B.A. and more than a decade of experience running a multimillion-dollar company. The outsider seemed like exactly the kind of leader Arlington wanted.

For the first two years of his tenure, as test scores improved and he got the school budget back on track, Levenson's businesslike approach won him a devoted following. So it was a surprise when, in March 2007, an angry mob poured into a school committee meeting to demand his head.

At issue was Levenson's decision to get rid of a popular middle school principal named Stavroula Bouris. Wearing a tie decorated with yellow school buses, Levenson sat in the center of the room as the crowd of 250 parents and teachers encircled him, the way teens close ranks around a schoolyard brawl in the hope of seeing some blood. 

"It is truly a sad day for Arlington," a middle school teacher said, when a principal can be subjected to "such a callous and immoral act on the part of the superintendent." Playing to the crowd, the teacher told them the faculty at Bouris's school had just taken a unanimous vote of no confidence in Levenson. Then he addressed the superintendent directly: "I know that you think we will go away, but we will not. Realize that truth may be hidden for a while, but it will never die." The shouts and tears and applause that followed didn't die down for more than four minutes.

Levenson's decision—and the reaction to it—caused even one of his strongest allies on the school committee to turn against him. "I could go on and on about how I've seen your shortcomings...about your lack of understanding of this community and the people in it...about your self-promotion, and about your hubris," Martin Thrope said. "Whether or not Stavroula Bouris goes or stays," he added, "you're finished in this town."

What followed over the next few months, in what would come to be known as "Nategate," was a series of revelations that forced Levenson from his job, divided the town, and even called into question the grand ambitions that had led to his hiring in the first place. In the end, it turned out that Levenson had made the mistake of thinking that when Arlington residents said they were ready for change, they actually meant it.

It's only a slight exaggeration to say there are two types of people in Arlington, and you can tell them apart by where they do their grocery shopping. The townies prefer the rough-around-the-edges Johnnie's Foodmaster because, well, it's good enough. Then there are the newcomers, who go to the newly renovated Stop & Shop (but wish it were a Whole Foods). When it comes to most things, townies tend to like Arlington as it is, thank you very much; newcomers look to neighboring Belmont and Lexington and covet their farm stands, yoga studios, and—most of all—superlative schools.

In 2004, the hunt for a new superintendent seemed the perfect time to remake Arlington's schools in the image of its neighbors'. "We felt that Arlington was ready," says Suzanne Baratta Owayda, who chaired the search committee. "With the right leadership, we thought we could compete with the Lexingtons and Needhams, and even the Wellesleys and Westons."

To fulfill that ambition, in 2005 the committee picked Levenson, making him the first superintendent in the state not to have come up through the ranks of the education system. It was thought he would bring dispassionate business principles to the task of managing cash-strapped schools. And, perhaps in a sign of how badly the committee wanted drastic advances, it was willing to overlook the fact that, save for two years assisting a small-town superintendent, Levenson had never worked in a school system.

Levenson jumped into the new job. He knew he couldn't compete with wealthier school districts in raising cash, so he had to be creative. He found huge savings when he hired a staffer to troll eBay for used textbooks, and came up with a plan to make thousands in profit by charging foreign exchange students to come to town.

Some thought Levenson was cavalier, however, when it came to stickier personnel decisions. He eventually dismissed a broad swath of school administrators, along with some 15 other employees (and briefly considered shuttering an elementary school). Though he redirected $500,000 of the cash he saved into programs that cut the number of students reading below grade level in half, the layoffs did not sit well with many in town. "These were people, not commodities," says one longtime resident.

For Levenson, Ottoson Middle School symbolized much of what needed fixing. In 2005, it was the lone Arlington school that failed to meet certain federal standards in math. As much as this frustrated Levenson, he also knew that many of the Ottoson faculty saw him as little more than an MCAS-obsessed theoretician. "Nate was from outside of Arlington," says Glenn Koocher, executive director of the state's association of school committees. "He brought a different perspective that posed a threat to the people whose main opposition was never having done it that way before."

It was inevitable, then, that Levenson would butt heads with Stavroula Bouris, the Ottoson principal, who liked to consider her staff and students part of one big family. She arrived early each morning to greet the kids and teachers, chatted easily with parents, and once stood in the rain to direct traffic when a crossing guard didn't make it to work. For his part, the balding and bespectacled Levenson would never be mistaken, as one friend admits, for someone "warm and fuzzy."

When Levenson decided Bouris wasn't buying into his plans for improving the school, he moved to oust her, a decision that plenty saw as New Arlington trying to get rid of old Arlington.

Shortly after that heated school committee meeting in March 2007, Levenson backed down and agreed to keep Bouris on. But just two months later, something curious happened: A school employee gave Levenson a stack of e-mails between Bouris and one of her teachers, Chuck Coughlin. By the end of that summer, Levenson had fired them both.
 


 
PAGE 1 | 2 | 3   Next
 
 

User Comments:

Guilty parties left out
Posted by MDOYLE | Sep. 30, 2009 at 6:42 PM
COMMENT:
Jeff Thielman was the School committee member who leaked the emails to a blogger named Spraque at a site called "Your Arlington" If the arbitration goes against Arlington, they too will most likely be held accountable through the legal/court system. The whole thing is most embarrassing. Please note that a vocal minority on the "A"list defended Leveninson till the bitter end, but, they were the same moonbats who defended Senator Marzilli in his previous episodes, till he got caught running through the streets of Lowell.
Reply
Posted by Anonymous | Oct. 1, 2009 at 7:56 AM
COMMENT:
Two comments; My first thought on this whole event was one of the spouses provided the information. Second, how does one "leak" something deemed part of the public record?
BRAVO!
Posted by Anonymous | Oct. 1, 2009 at 7:57 AM
COMMENT:
Bravo on this story. It's one that many of my neighbors would rather see fade away - but someone needs to pay the piper for all the bad decisions made over the last 5 years! It's the only way Arlington can move forward.
That party is not guilty
Posted by Joe | Oct. 1, 2009 at 4:01 PM
COMMENT:
Jeff Thielman didn't "leak" anything. He gave public records to a member of the press who asked for them. Coughlin/Bouris/Mondano went to court on this point and lost, which is why this article can quote from the emails. Oh, and Jeff was handily re-elected this past April, despite (or maybe because of) an opponent who talked about nothing but "the emails".
Not everyone hates Nate
Posted by Eric | Oct. 1, 2009 at 4:13 PM
COMMENT:
Many, many Arlintonians still back Nate's decsions. And it amazes me that people defend the teacher and principal. Would you want your kid taught in a school run by someone with so little regard for accountability that they tolerate this? Would you want your kid taught by someone so stupid and sophmoric that they would send emails like that? I'm very glad that the teacher and principal are gone. Just sorry that they are so vindictive, instead of apologetic for what they have put the town through.
In reply to Matt Doyle
Posted by Bob | Oct. 1, 2009 at 4:34 PM
COMMENT:
I am not a blogger. I manage a local-news site called YourArlington.com. The site has a blog, but it primarily has news stories. School Committee member Jeff Thielman provided me with public documents after I requested them them from him. I do not think any legal case can be made for publishing public documents. In writing this, I am not defending Nate Levenson. Bob Sprague
Emails were not necessarily public record
Posted by Anonymous | Oct. 1, 2009 at 8:09 PM
COMMENT:
People seem to be forgetting that the fact of whether these emails were public record had to go to court and the ruling stated that this was a tricky situation and that these emails would not necessarily normally be considered public record, but in this case it was deemed so. Not all emails by school employees are public record. There are exclusions. A judge had to think hard about it. Why would a school committee member find it so easy to release such things? And, do so on his own, rather than as a decision with the entire committee? Let alone the decision that the media (yourarlington) made to publish things where any middle schooler with the slightest amount of computer literacy could find and read it? Who is really to blame for exposing children to this whole thing?
The impact on students
Posted by Anne | Oct. 1, 2009 at 8:27 PM
COMMENT:
What I remember most about this is my 6th grade daughter coming home from school one day with a blue ribbon on her backpack. When I asked her what is was, she told me that she was supporting the principal because the new superintendent was trying to fire her. She told me that all of the teachers were wearing the ribbons and they were giving them to the kids who asked. She knew way too many details about the situation - many of them wildly off base. "It's not fair that the Superintendent won't let Mrs B. be friends with the teachers." As time went on the stories got more and more detailed - up to including quotes from emails and wondering if the principal and Mr. C were getting divorced. When asked, she told me that teachers and parents were talking about it all the time. Many of the adults were acting like children and few seemed to care about the impact on the students.
The impact on students
Posted by Anne | Oct. 1, 2009 at 8:49 PM
COMMENT:
What I remember most about this is my 6th grade daughter coming home from school one day with a blue ribbon on her backpack. When I asked her what is was, she told me that she was supporting the principal because the new superintendent was trying to fire her. She told me that all of the teachers were wearing the ribbons and they were giving them to the kids who asked. She knew way too many details about the situation - many of them wildly off base. "It's not fair that the Superintendent won't let Mrs B. be friends with the teachers." As time went on the stories got more and more detailed - up to including quotes from emails and wondering if the principal and Mr. C were getting divorced. When asked, she told me that teachers and parents were talking about it all the time. Many of the adults were acting like children and few seemed to care about the impact on the students.
Response to "That party is not Guilty"
Posted by MDoyle | Oct. 1, 2009 at 8:53 PM
COMMENT:
lets see the bloggers public records request to Thielman and the school committee, does it exits? Of course it doen't. This was a personnel matter, a Human Resources and Superintendant's office matter. Thielman later apologized for what he did stating "I felt the public needed to know". The school department has a chairperson and a public relations rep to deal with the press and individual request. Thielman was neither at the time. He was just eager to break the story and cause harm to Coughlin and Bouris. Please note some of the Documents were "Private Account" emails and not part of the school email system. The accounts were hacked and the emails used against Coughlin and Bouris, private correspondence between consenting adults, which by todays standards, is supposed to be none of our business.
Response to "In Reply to Matt Doyle" "I am not blogger"
Posted by MDOYLE | Oct. 1, 2009 at 9:21 PM
COMMENT:
Lets recap the story:Coughlin and Bouris get fired, public outcry ensues with a demand for a reason. The public is told repeatedly, this is a private, personnel matter and will not be discussed. Yet somehow Bob Spraque is aware of "public documents" as they relate to the firings and claims he supposedly "requested them from Thielman". The school department has no written record of this request, or of any department employee acting on same said request. This shady story does not add up. Sprague is magically aware of something that no one else is told about. AND Of course by this logic, any of us can request a copy of a town employees personnel jacket. You can get it within hours, read it, share it, gossip about it, and publish it on the iternet. WOW! the whole thing is an extreme embarrassment to Atown.
the emails were public record
Posted by Joe | Oct. 2, 2009 at 9:07 AM
COMMENT:
MDOYLE - you admit the judge ruled the emails were public record. And it wasn't a personnel jacket. The information published was in the School Committee's packet, and the press requests that all the time. And why was it in the packet? Because Coughlin was calling up SC members and complaining, so they started asking questions.
The emails were not public record entirely
Posted by MDOYLE | Oct. 2, 2009 at 10:37 AM
COMMENT:
Joe: The judge ruled that the "APS" server emails were public record. The judge did not rule on the private account emails, the ones that were hacked and produced by the Levenson administration to the blogger. AND this ruling came after it all went down. Further, evidence has shown that Thielman gave them to Spraque prior to the the rest of the school committe even having them. Stop towing the company line and tell the truth Joe. Those buckets of water must be getting heavy.
big holes in story
Posted by Anonymous | Oct. 2, 2009 at 7:14 PM
COMMENT:
Special Ed. Levenson's predecessor, Kay Donovan, denied services to kids to help her budget. The DOE issued two scathing reports about it and several million $$ PER YEAR in funding was threatened. Levenson had to clean up this mess, and Bouris continued "the old ways". The special ed parents strongly supported his initial decision not to renew her contract. The forged email. Couglin forged an email, supposedly from Levenson, for Bouris. They claimed it was "only" so she could deceive her husband. The "unanimous" vote of no confidence was a scam. Barely 1/3 of the teachers were even at the meeting, and it was a show of hands vote, with enforcement by the same bullies who gathered the mob and targeted students with ribbons. And the "Arlington List" is a few dozen who post at all, with maybe two dozen who argued about this issue, some on each side. Notice how one poster here is arguing with everyone else, but he's just one guy even if he posts a lot.
big holes in story
Posted by Debbie | Oct. 2, 2009 at 7:19 PM
COMMENT:
Special Ed. Levenson's predecessor, Kay Donovan, denied services to kids to help her budget. The DOE issued two scathing reports about it and several million $$ PER YEAR in funding was threatened. Levenson had to clean up this mess, and Bouris continued "the old ways". The special ed parents strongly supported his initial decision not to renew her contract. The forged email. Couglin forged an email, supposedly from Levenson, for Bouris. They claimed it was "only" so she could deceive her husband. The "unanimous" vote of no confidence was a scam. Barely 1/3 of the teachers were even at the meeting, and it was a show of hands vote, with enforcement by the same bullies who gathered the mob and targeted students with ribbons. And the "Arlington List" is a few dozen who post at all, with maybe two dozen who argued about this issue, some on each side. Notice how one poster here is arguing with everyone else, but he's just one guy even if he posts a lot.
To Debby et al
Posted by Anonymous | Oct. 2, 2009 at 9:16 PM
COMMENT:
Were you at the arbitrations? Do you know if there was a forgery? I know Levenson claimed there was a forgery. I know the 2 have denied it. I know the Supt. resigned because he got caught dirty in regards to Coughlin's hearing. We do not know what he actually did. Reason we do not why he actually left is that "it would hurt Arlington in the arbitrations." Why no pressure for hero Thielman to let us know the reason(s). Didn't he give us the Bouris Coughlin scoop because the public has a right to know. I have my own opinions but not all the facts. Here is what I recall: Bouris out, Hundreds complain, Coughlin calls Levenson liar, Bouris back, Bouris Coughlin out, Bouris Coughlin win unemployment cases, Levenson resigns from 1/2M contract, Coughlin wins removal of dept. head position, arbitration results to follow. My money is on Bouris Coughlin. Not that hard to follow.
public record
Posted by Joe | Oct. 3, 2009 at 3:25 PM
COMMENT:
MDOYLE - That's right. The emails you're so upset about were ruled to be public records. Your descent into insults shows you have no arguments left.
Not just the "townies"...
Posted by Anonymous | Oct. 4, 2009 at 5:29 AM
COMMENT:
Why did the public have a right to know all details about Bouris & Coughlin, yet Mr Levenson's "impropriety" has not been made public? Many in Arlington would like to know that. Also,for the record many "newcomers",(the same ones who wish Stop & Shop was Whole Foods)are disgusted by Mr Levenson's actions as well....it is not just the "townies" who objected to him and this whole situation.

Posted by Anonymous | Oct. 4, 2009 at 9:19 AM
COMMENT:
What about the "staff member" who "assisted"Mr.Levenson in procuring the emails...personal or from the school system? Anonymity for her too? She gets a raise & others lose their job? Why wasn't she,at a bare minimum, reprimanded instead of being rewarded and continuing to work there? Prime example of what Nate Levenson's brand of management has brought to Arlington. Divisivness and intrigue....perhaps firing that staff member would send a message that that type of behavior will not be tolerated or rewarded either. The School Committee (who voted in her raise) should be ashamed of themelves.
reply to "To Debby et al"
Posted by Debbie | Oct. 4, 2009 at 10:38 AM
COMMENT:
The first response from the surrogates of Coughlin and Bouris was "it was a joke". Then the denials came later. Well, if it didn't happen, the denials would have come right away. You're entitled to your opinions, but your recollection of events omits things you seem not to want to believe, such as the drop in support after the allegations came out and losing the public records ruling. The unemployment was pretty cut and dried - it wasn't worth the district's money to pursue it. The state pays unemployment up to a hard limit, and any unemployment is deducted from any back pay that could be awarded. The judge really didn't have to consider anything. Same with the dept head position. Unlike the public records case, which was decided on its merits. And where do you get the idea Levenson had a 1-2M contract? He made 150K+/year.
Don't get bent out of shape
Posted by Martin | Oct. 4, 2009 at 6:59 PM
COMMENT:
Here I was thinking that Johnny's and Stop and Shop sold the same damn stuff and people went to the store that was more convenient for them. But now I find out that Johnny's is a proletariat mecca! Combine that with "many [anonymously] believe that", [anonymous] bravely saying "I would be my life on it", and even "there's even a rumor", and you see that Boston Magazine is way more comic book than newspaper. Keep it in perspective, folks.
Arlington Schools
Posted by Janice | Oct. 5, 2009 at 8:52 AM
COMMENT:
What's the point of this article? The article should have been: Today, are children in the APS better served and performing better than before Nate?
Public Record, response to Joe
Posted by MDOYLE | Oct. 5, 2009 at 9:25 AM
COMMENT:
Joe: FIRST:Laws and SC procedures should have been followed. Thielman and the blogger Sprague did what they wanted. The law was broken, Confidential records were made public before being allowed to be. SECOND:The judge ruling half the emails public record after Thielman and spraque committed this, is irrelevant. Besides, its the second half of the emails that forced Levenson to resign, and that will hurt the town. They are the smoking gun anyway. I wonder who instructed the staffer to hack the email accounts??
In further replay to Matt Doyle
Posted by Bob | Oct. 5, 2009 at 10:35 AM
COMMENT:
You wrote: "Further, evidence has shown that Thielman gave them to Spraque prior to the rest of the school committe even having them." Please provide your evidence, Matt, I will publish it on YourArlington (once confirmed). As the reporter who requested this information, I can assure you asked *all* SC members in late June 2007 for a response to rumors. Only Thielman responded. Be advised that the law firm for the committee does have my public records request dated July 16, 2007, seeking all e-mails in the matter. Bob Sprague
Arlington Schools
Posted by Jane | Oct. 5, 2009 at 4:06 PM
COMMENT:
As one of the staffers who retired in '06(before the firings)just to avoid working with Nate one more year, let me say this: (1) Any money Mrs Donavan was ever able to save was eaten up by legal bills the town must now pay for Levenson's vendetta against an outstanding principal. (2) Those "new folks" didn't complain as the town took out loan after loan to build new schools in their neighborhoods. (3)This has been a tragic event in Ms Bouris life and career just because of one man's pride, deviousness and ill-will. And finally, judging a community on where people shop is one example of BOSTON magazines superficial reporting. Most of the people in Arlington shop where they can get the best bargain for their hard earned money foremost among them the under-paid teaching staff in the town.
Doyle response to Sprague
Posted by MDOYLE | Oct. 6, 2009 at 6:42 AM
COMMENT:
Sprague wrote: "Be advised that the law firm for the committee does have my public records request dated July 16, 2007, seeking all e-mails in the matter".... As requested to Bob by many, please show the evidence that the Arlington Publics Schools and School committee chair recieved your public records request and the diary of the Districts responses to you.
reply to Jane
Posted by Anonymous | Oct. 7, 2009 at 6:48 AM
COMMENT:
1) Kay didn't "save" money in the long run - the DOE showed up with the bill. 3) Like it or not, Bouris was unemployable after the mob meeting described in the article. No super would risk it happening to them.
Spraponse to Doyle
Posted by Bob | Oct. 10, 2009 at 10:15 AM
COMMENT:
Doyle wrote: "As requested to Bob by many, please show the evidence that the Arlington Publics Schools and School committee chair recieved your public records request and the diary of the Districts responses to you." Matt: You are the first person to ask me directly to justify my public-records request. "Many" have asked for it? I doubt it. The record of my request is largely irrelevant (though I have the registered receipt for the letter involved). The schools' law firm received the request in July 2007, and it was a matter of court argument that year. The arbitrator is due to rule. Let's see what the ruling is -- and try to look ahead.
Resistance to change
Posted by john | Oct. 13, 2009 at 3:06 PM
COMMENT:
Wow, sounds just like the national scene. Apparent victory, the n virulent resistance to change. No real issue except "our America" and "our Arlington."
Good riddance to both sides
Posted by A | Oct. 20, 2009 at 7:03 AM
COMMENT:
I teach in the Arlington system and am happy to see both Levenson and Bouris/Caughlin leave. They both were sneaky and both tried to mess with other people's emails. I don't really understand why people can passionately defend either side.
Beginning or endiing?
Posted by Anonymous | Oct. 27, 2009 at 10:14 PM
COMMENT:
Beginning or ending?
Posted by Anonymous | Oct. 27, 2009 at 10:32 PM
COMMENT:
Now that the longest arbitration in Massachusetts history has ended & ruled in favor of Chuck Coughlin, is victory for Bouris far behind? If they both win, can a major lawsuit against the Town of Arlington be just around the corner? The remnants of Nate Levenson's machinations just continue to fester. And yet, we still have not been told exactly what his "impropriety" was. So, has justice been done? Seems Nate is above the laws, rules & guidelines that he castigated others for allegedly breaking.True justice would be for him (along with anyone who assisted him in the email procurement)to be subjected to the same intrusive public scrutiny he imposed upon Coughlin & Bouris. Let's see if that indeed happens.....
I'm glad I left
Posted by Cynthia | Oct. 30, 2009 at 9:01 AM
COMMENT:
This article and the comments that follow it brought back that old sick feeling to my gut. Along with many others, I loved teaching at the Ottoson under Paul Lamoureaux and then Stavroula Bouris. Our principals loved children and helped us to serve them better. Nate's actions and the ensuing controversy made teaching at the Ottoson decidedly undesireable. The exodus of long-time, much loved and dedicated teachers from the Ottoson to other systems speaks volumes. That so many would not or could not leave was a benefit for Arlington. Nate cruelly and callously ruined the career of a treasured administrator and broke the morale of his teaching staff. Coughlin's arbitration victory will ring hollow until Arlington honors it, and no repayment (monetary, judicial, or otherwise) can ever right the wrongs done to Stavroula by the town. I'm glad I left, and still sad for all the losses felt by the children, the teachers, and the town. At least a fine new principal is reenergizing the school thi
I'm glad I left, continued
Posted by Cynthia | Oct. 30, 2009 at 9:06 AM
COMMENT:
...At least a fine new principal is reenergizing the school this year. Good luck, Ottoson; keep fighting the good fight and caring about the students you serve. Cynthia Winfield, former English teacher, now Middle Tennessee farmer www.pandcworganicfarm.blogspot.com
 
Boston Buzzworthy

Guide to Colleges and Universities 2012

Your guide to finding the right college and university from the publishers of Boston magazine in association with the New England Board of Higher Education.
 
 

Best of Boston 2011 iPhone App

For your iPhone: Keep the city's best restaurants, shops and services at your fingertips! Browse five years of winners including our brand-new 2010 list. Click here to download now!
 
 

Dental Profiles

A healthy smile says so much. This section includes some of Boston's finest dentists specializing in a variety of fields.
 
 

Medical Profiles

It's no secret that Boston is a hub of world-class healthcare. With this guide, you'll be able to make informed decisions about your healthcare when the time comes.
 
 
 
This text is replaced by the Flash movie.
 
 

To view this page, you must be using Internet Explorer 7 or higher. Please visit microsoft.com for more information.