Feature Article

The Shocking Truth

At the Judge Rotenberg Center, students who misbehave receive electric shocks powerful enough to sear their skin. What's even more unbelievable is how the moms and dads of the kids there feel about the Canton school.

By Paul Kix

Judge Rotenberg Center student P.J. Biscardi. Photos by Christopher Churchill.

Page 1 of 7

This is the machine.

It is a gray square of hard plastic, looks like a garage door opener but is perhaps double the size of one. Inside this square is the circuit board and all that is evil and beneficent and contentious about the machine. But the square itself couldn't be more pedestrian. Fastened to it, by Velcro, is another casing of hard plastic, another square, which houses a 12-volt battery. Dangling from the machine's corners are wires, and at the ends of these wires, electrodes that emit 60 volts and 15 milliamps of electricity in two-second bursts. The electrodes are attached to the arms, legs, or stomachs of roughly half of the 209 students at the Judge Rotenberg Center in Canton. The machine's sole purpose is to shock these students. The shocks are viewed by JRC, and pretty much only JRC, as a corrective therapy.

It is a painful shock; you hear all sorts of stories about it. JRC's lawyers used to let journalists receive it, but not anymore. They can watch, though. They can watch Ralph Antonelli, director of quality control training at JRC, a wiry man with swept-back black hair, secure an electrode to his right forearm, the machine on the table before him, and the transmitter for it, the little remote control that staffers hold at all times, sitting next to that. They can watch as Antonelli presses the button and his forearm tenses and his middle and ring fingers shoot downward toward his palm. Then they can watch his face, relaxed even as the transmitter is beeping and the electrode is bzzzing his skin. "See?" he says. "Just two seconds and it's over." Some liken it, as Antonelli does, to a bee sting. Others, including a student who's received it, call it the longest two seconds of their lives. One thing is certain about the machine, known as the Graduated Electronic Decelerator: What we just witnessed isn't it at its most powerful. There is a version that is three times stronger.

The school says that the GED needed more juice. The mentally handicapped and behaviorally impaired students who attend JRC, who are in fact its lone attendees, weren't responding to the machine. So in the early 1990s, a couple of years after the GED was first developed, the school made a new one—upping the milliamps from 15 to 41 and the voltage to 66, and calling it the GED IV. Even at its higher capacity, the GED IV still carries less power than a stun gun, a defibrillator, or a cattle prod. But the GED IV, as well as the base model, has been found in numerous state reports and in the accounts of former JRC staffers to burn students' skin. Some have been taken off it for a month at a time as a result. And then put back on.

These students are severely autistic, mentally retarded, or behaviorally challenged children and adults. JRC is the only school in the country to shock them—using a machine it alone manufactures, a machine it distributes to no one else. Some Massachusetts legislators who've filed bills this year to limit the use of the machine call it "barbaric" and the school "like Abu Ghraib."

The legislators are only half-correct. Spend enough time around the machine and it will test everything you know about right and wrong.

This is the machine's inventor. He is an unassuming old man, short and with a slight potbelly, rounded shoulders, half a head of curly white hair, and warm eyes. He looks as if he could be Fred Rogers's older brother. Matthew Israel, 75, is the founder and executive director of JRC, which he incorporated under a different name in 1971. Israel responded to questions for this article only by e-mail, but while watching the school's promotional video one notices the softness of Israel's voice, just above a whisper and even-toned, even while describing the GED's purpose. One notices the academic's indifference to dress: Israel often wears suits when he's photographed, but the tie droops a few inches below his belt line and the jacket fairly engulfs the tiny man. In Israel's writings on the school's website and in interviews he has given, one notices his dream, as grand as anyone's in Hollywood but documented and executed better than most scientists'. Matthew Israel is out to save those that society discards.

He grew up in Brookline, the son of a lawyer and the younger of two brothers. Israel had loving parents; they rarely spanked him, and punishment was never emphasized. At Brookline High School he was one year ahead of Michael Dukakis. They ran cross-country together and became good friends.

Israel entered Harvard in 1950 unsure of what to do with his life. Later that freshman year he picked up Walden Two, a novel by the behavioral psychologist B. F. Skinner, who taught at Harvard. The controversial book is about a utopian society where behaviors can be modified for the benefit of all inhabitants. It is based on Skinner's theory of operant conditioning: If an action is rewarded, it increases the likelihood that the person will perform the action again. This is, after all, how Skinner had taught pigeons to play table tennis: by rewarding the behaviors that led to their game. Israel loved Walden Two and Skinner's theory. He wanted to start his own utopian community based on its ideals. For the next 10 years, he studied under Skinner, first as an undergrad; then as a grad student; and finally as a postdoctorate fellow, after having received his Ph.D. in psychology from Harvard in 1960.

Following his time at Harvard, Israel started a commune in 1967 in Arlington. He hoped to grow it into his utopia. The previous year Israel had founded the Association for Social Design, whose objective was to "establish a network of associated experimental communities in cities throughout the world," writes Hilke Kuhlmann in the 2005 book Living "Walden Two": B. F. Skinner's Behaviorist Utopia and Experimental Communities. Israel's Arlington commune was the first step toward something he was tentatively calling "Walden Three."

At the commune, Israel lived next to a spoiled three-year-old named Andrea. Andrea whacked people with a broom. She screamed. She cried. She wanted always to barge into Israel's room. He asked Andrea's mother if he could try behavioral techniques on the girl. She agreed. Israel rewarded Andrea when she behaved well—going on walks with her and giving her treats. And one day when Andrea screamed as she sat in time-out, he flicked his finger against her cheek. The girl quieted down, and he left the room. A few minutes later, she started up again. Israel returned and once more flicked his finger. The crying stopped for good. In the days and weeks that followed, Israel could look at Andrea when she acted out and shake his head, and the girl would stop. She became a "charming individual," Israel once told Mother Jones.

Soon after that, Israel's commune fell apart. As did a second he started in the South End. As did, ultimately, the Association for Social Design, despite the fact that it had expanded to three other cities. In Living "Walden Two," Kuhlmann blames Israel, suggesting he, as the commune's patriarch, wanted his inhabitants to live lives based on altering one another's behavior; the others in the communes and the association thought this was no life at all. Israel says the communities fell apart because the people living in them didn't get along. Simple as that.

But he wasn't ready to give up. He thought if he opened a school, he could provide the commune's inhabitants with jobs. A self-sustaining economy might lead, ultimately, to utopia. Plus, he kept thinking about the success he'd had with Andrea. Skinner had experimented only with rats and pigeons, but Israel had had this little girl, a real person, whose behavior had changed as surely as Skinner's vermin's. Israel wanted his school to serve autistic children—their actions could be changed with fewer social ramifications, Kuhlmann writes—where he could implement the theories his predecessor had tested in the lab. But the pupil would differ from his teacher: He would punish the children when necessary. Skinner never advocated that.


 

Page | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | Next


Change text size
Print

Email

Write a comment
 
 

User comments

Child abuse
Posted by Anonymous | Jul. 1, 2008 at 2:05 PM
COMMENT:
Since when are parents allowed to have their children abused? DSS would intervene in any other situation, if children were being hurt, except at JRI. Why doesn't the Commonwealth force the school to use positive behavioral intervention with the same intensity and staffing numbers and then state knowledgeably whether the behaviors can be modified without punishment.
It's time to wake up
Posted by Anonymous | Jul. 3, 2008 at 7:07 AM
COMMENT:
As a family member, professional and advocate for many years, there are many positive ways to deal with the serious challenges of individuals so demanding. The money and the expertise is there. Our state and the people of Massachusetts need to find the will and the outrage to demand change and programs that really meet people's needs as human beings. Our family and many others have been able to do so but not without lots of work, research, advocacy and refusing to take NO as an answer.
Call your legislators
Posted by Bill | Jul. 3, 2008 at 6:51 PM
COMMENT:
Please do more than post message here. Call your state Senators and Representatives (617 722-2000) and express your outrage to them. Advocates have tried unsuccessfully for over 20 years to either ban aversive treatment or have tighter regulations. We need help from voters who are outraged!
Simplistic answers to complicated problems
Posted by Anonymous | Jul. 6, 2008 at 11:02 AM
COMMENT:
Massachusetts is notorious for short-term politically-sensitive solutions to problems that are political nowhere else. When someone develops a program that dependably out-performs JRI, there will be no more JRI. Until then, walk a mile in the shoes of parents who have no other options. Stories like Haleigh Poultre in today's Sunday Globe are not unique. Complicated questions demand complicated answers, unfortunately. Ask any MA baby boomer what state institutions were like prior to community-based treatment. JRI is like Disney World in comparison.
"Oversight" is definitely needed at JRC
Posted by Greg | Jul. 6, 2008 at 1:26 PM
COMMENT:
I am one of the former JRC staff quoted in this article. What is largely missing at JRC is state oversight, where appropriate individuals review the treatments that students are receiving on a regular basis and monitor what treatments are necessary after other methods have been exhausted. Every behavior for which student receives shocks needs to be monitored. Psychologists have left because they were not permitted to use other approaches published in psyciatric journals before resorting to shocks. JRC currently has free reign to shock students for minor behaviors. They use the major behaviors as an excuse, and continue to shock students after progress is made and other methods are available. Example: student shocked for closing his eyes for five seconds AFTER he quit self-abusive and aggressive behaviors and had become pleasant. That is when additional behaviors are stacked on without safegaurds that NEED to be implemented. In addition, nobody seems to monitor the stress of oth
the dehumanization of people with disabilities
Posted by barbara | Jul. 13, 2008 at 2:00 PM
COMMENT:
It is sad to see that Mr. Kix bought into the BRI/JRC brutality, and done his bit to contribute to the dehumanization of people with disabilities. There is no other class of people whose behavior would allow this kind of torture. Furthermore there are more deaths at BRI (omission)than described in this article and Iwata developed the SIBIS at Johns Hopkins (error, one of many) as well as many other errors or omissions. This article is a tragedy. Some of us loved our tough kids enough to work with them and keep trying.
torture
Posted by ellen | Jul. 15, 2008 at 8:38 AM
COMMENT:
Twenty three years ago when I was President of the Autism society in Massachusetts I wrote a letter to the Globe in reference to the BRI abomination. Here is an excerpt:" If I were to threaten to take a dog and shackle it, helmet it, deprive it of food and spray it with ammonia, I would be castigated and hanged by every jury in the land. Perhaps there is an underlying innate prejudice that relegates anything outside the norm to second-class status, and thus experimentation and abuse are viewed with callous indifference." 23 years later and the only thing that has changed is that the torture has been refined to astronomical proportions. Wrap it any package that you like, sanction it with desperate parents, throw a few sanctimonious PHDs at it and it still remains the same. It is torture. Shame on all of us for tolerating this criminal behavior. I thank God that my own son never fell victim to this heinous perversion.
Emotional and Physical Damage Done by Shock
Posted by Kevin | Jul. 18, 2008 at 3:00 PM
COMMENT:
From two whistleblower reports and media coverage I've seen, other autistic children and adults in the vicinity of the person about to be shocked also start screaming in terror when a JRC person reaches for their shock belt as they think that the shock may be meant for them. At times, these autistic people get shocked because they screamed in fear of possibly being shocked. This is barbaric and needs to stop -- as does the heavy drugging of the autistic in other facilities.
Since when are parents allowed to have their children abused?
Posted by Anonymous | Jul. 1, 2008 at 10:00 PM
COMMENT:
In response to: Since when are parents allowed to have their children abused? More often than you think. see www.cafety.org
torture?
Posted by Anonymous | Aug. 22, 2008 at 12:09 AM
COMMENT:
The last two pages give a really haunting argument for the use of GED. Read it before trying to argue. You can't address the issue by shutting down a solution you don't like. I myself think that if the punishments were less strict, tragedies could be averted. But I wonder how many more tragedies there would be without this torture/aversive treatment solution. Face it, little to no progress has been made in alternative fields. It's not enough to be useful. The GED is. If you actually manage to shut down the JRC or ban aversive treatment, you'd better take responsibility for those autistic, bipolar, troubled kids, because you're taking away their last lifeline.
DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT!
Posted by Anonymous | Sep. 21, 2008 at 11:06 PM
COMMENT:
Those of you who live in the states that regulate these treatment center must contact your government officials and put a stop to this. Call your local newspapers! TV stations! Please help these children. Please become involved.
Horrified To Learn of This
Posted by Anonymous | Sep. 23, 2008 at 11:07 AM
COMMENT:
I can't begin to tell you how shocked and horrified I am by this article. I can't believe this mode of treatment is being used in this age of advanced knowledge and heightened awareness of mental illnesses. I hope that public outrage will have some effect upon the people who are doing these things to human beings who are at the mercy of the system and those who run it.
Former Student
Posted by Anonymous | Oct. 13, 2008 at 4:15 PM
COMMENT:
As a former student who was on the GED, I can honestly attest that JRC is not the horror house the media portrays it to be. I can also attest that Dr. Israel is not the psycho people make him out to be. There are several things about JRC that I disagree with. But in all honesty, JRC gave me my life back. Before JRC, I was in and out of all kinds of placements and I was doped up on meds to the point of oblivion. Once I started at JRC and after the GED was implemented, I began living as normal a life as my disability would allow. The placements I was at prior to JRC told my parents that me graduating from high school and living a normal adult life would be nothing short of a miracle. Once I got to JRC, they told me and my parents that graduating from high school isn't a miracle, its a reality. And they were right, I did wind of graduating and with high honors I might add. It took a little longer and a little more effort than it would most people, but in the end I did it. As far a
Former Student (Continued)
Posted by Anonymous | Oct. 13, 2008 at 4:17 PM
COMMENT:
as the program itself is concerned, there are some things that I disagree with, especially when it comes to how the GED is used. However, if the GED were removed, the results would be nothing short of catastrophic. I do believe that JRC treats some behaviors with the GED that are unnecessary and I do believe that the approval process should a little more rigorous than it currently is. I truly don't believe that the GED is for everyone and I truly don't believe that it should be an common option in treating problem behaviors. However, when the alternative is self inflicted injury or death, being warehoused in hospitals or jails, or being doped up on meds to the point where you can't even recognize your own mother, there is a place for the GED. Kudos to the author for equally presenting both sides of this story which is something that journalist generally neglect to do when reporting about JRC.
that sloppy dresser gives shocks to kids for failing to dress neatly
Posted by KateGladstone | Jan. 7, 2009 at 3:33 AM
COMMENT:
Your article notes the sloppy dress habits of this torture-meister who (according to the procedural manual of the school he founded) requires administering electric shocks to children for "failure to maintain a neat appearance." (Google this phrase plus "JRC" to see documentation of this.) If Doctor Matthew Israel really believes in electric-shock teaching-by-torture as the key to a utopian society of the perfectly behaved, let him strap his machine onto himself and invite staffers and students to administer the punishment he commands for all such breaches.
I was once a staff at JRC
Posted by Marissa | Aug. 19, 2009 at 6:51 AM
COMMENT:
JRC was one of the worst schools you can ever imagine. The children were severely mentally reatarded and autistic, although regardless of this, they have been recieving multiple skin shocks for minor behavior. I mean come on these are people neverless, people with severe disabilitie, and some even none verbal. JRC seemed more like a jail than a school to me as they used transportation restraints on hands and even feet. Real prison like handcuffes, straightjackets, white noise helmets and even four point boards and four point chairs. The disabled persons there had absolutely no freedom, and most whom were constanlty restrained and got skin shocks. I once had to work at a JRC residence (Lorusso) and one of the patients was on the phone with her mother. I was asked to stand near the phone and monitor their conversation. I mean how could that be? Whenever a patient was on the phone his/her conversation had to be monitered. That sounds like no privacy or human rights whatsoever to

Post a comment

(* = required field.)
  • Please check to make sure that your referer is not blocked.


Subject line of your comment*
Your comments (200 words max)*
Email*
First name*
Last Name*
Enter the code shown below.
Visual CAPTCHA
This helps prevent automated form submissions.
Boston Buzzworthy

Fresh Fall Libations

Guide to tasty signature cocktails for fall.
 
 

Dental Profiles

Keep your mouth happy and your body healthy. Find Boston’s finest dentists here.