Feature Article

The Shocking Truth

By Paul Kix

Page 5 of 7


Part II

You don't know. You don't know what it's like to be the parent of a student at the Judge Rotenberg Center. You don't know what it takes to hear all this and still come out in favor of the school, and you don't know because you don't have a kid who pulls out her hair in bloody clumps, who seems to enjoy that, okay, a kid whose scalp resembles that of a frontier settler worked over by a furious native. And then to see her today: happy, smiling, a brunette like any other brunette. And all thanks to JRC. Her life saved by the machine. Saved. And that's just one kid. Just one story. You see, there's another side.

For over 20 years state legislators have authored bills attempting to ban JRC's use of skin shocks. For over 20 years the bills have failed to pass. Attribute it, if you must, to the usual suspects: the lobbyists JRC employs, Brian S. Hickey Associates, among the most powerful on Beacon Hill and to whom JRC paid $120,000 in 2007, more than any other Hickey client. Or to state Representative Jeff Sanchez, Brandon's uncle, who gives JRC an entrenched and influential ally in the chamber. But those aren't the real reasons the bills fail. The real reason is because the parents want them to. Out of desperation the parents find JRC, and then out of a fierce loyalty they defend it.

So it went this year. Senator Joyce, who says reining in the school "would be among the most meaningful things I've ever been involved with," wrote legislation with state Representative John Scibak to limit the Judge Rotenberg Center's use of aversives. The thinking was, if they couldn't beat the school, they could maybe at least inhibit its "torture" (Joyce's word). But at a public hearing in January, 15 parents, one grandmother, and one sister spoke about the school, many of them coming from out of state, all of them pleading with legislators not to inhibit the school's practices. Several others who couldn't do so in person did so in writing. The letters from parents of JRC students stacked 6 inches high.

And so, for the 21st year, despite the news in the confidential report that a another student was shocked at least 28 times at Arthur's behest, leading to first-degree burns, the bill did not make it out of committee. In May, Joyce sneaked his anti-JRC measure into the state budget as an amendment, a last-ditch attempt with uncertain prospects. And advocates for the disabled have no one to blame for JRC's survival but the parents of its students.

Here are some other things you don't know.

Out on Turnpike Street in Canton, there is a rise in the road, and just after that a low-slung building with big bay windows from end to end. The Judge Rotenberg Center is not the dreary place you might imagine but a well-lit, almost antiseptically clean school whose classrooms are painted in bright colors—this one blue, that one red—and outfitted with sofas and big-screen televisions for kids who've behaved properly. In one such room, on a purple couch, is P. J. Biscardi. He is 41 years old, but looks no older than 16, with his tousled hair, thin mustache, and slight frame. You go to JRC and people surround you: No fewer than eight staffers and parents are on this trip surveying the grounds. One of them is P.J.'s father, Peter, a short, auburn-haired man, thick in the waist, who smiles when he sees his son. He walks over. "Have you been a good boy?" Peter asks. P.J. at first is unresponsive, but then whispers his affirmation. It goes like this for a few more moments, before Peter says, "Give me a kiss," and P.J. smacks a big one on his father's cheek.

At age three, P.J. was diagnosed with autism. One summer, while Peter drove the family to Cape Cod, P.J. grabbed his father's hair and pulled it out, blood smearing the upholstery. Peter and his wife, Maureen, had to lock everything in their house in Burlington—drawers, file cabinets, anything that could be opened—so P.J., then maybe all of 10, wouldn't destroy the place. Or kill himself. But it didn't matter: P.J. was violent. P.J. was violent, and P.J. was curious. One year, at a holiday meal with the extended family, P.J. sneaked into the bathroom and sipped Drano. Drano. Maureen had never yelled louder in her life. They rushed him to the hospital, where doctors announced, mercifully, that P.J. had only suffered chemical burns. Another time, P.J. took one of Peter's razor blades to his arms. "Hurt, hurt," he said, when Maureen saw the blood-soaked towel. P.J. was known to ram his body into the walls; you've never see a linebacker hit a wall with such force, Peter says. He tipped out dresser drawers, knocked over shelves of books. P.J. bit himself so much that a giant callus formed on the skin between his thumb and wrist, growing larger every time he drew fresh blood. The Biscardis' other children, an older sister and younger brother, never wanted their friends over. Peter and Maureen both blamed themselves for P.J.'s behaviors. Were it not for that, well, they knew a lot of parents of autistic children who had divorced.

The school district didn't want P.J. The Biscardis couldn't keep him at home. So they tried four treatment centers. At the last place, the drugs temporarily stunted P.J.'s growth. He was 12. Peter wasn't comfortable with the level of medication, especially since the drugs didn't seem to do much to keep the kid calm. The school's doctor told Peter, "If you don't increase the dose, we're not going to keep him here."

The Biscardis heard about Israel's center, then still called the Behavior Research Institute, through a parents' group for autistic children. Israel showed the Biscardis the success he'd had with his Skinnerian positive reinforcement. With the most troublesome kids, each small positive action earned a reward, and each reward became subsequently harder to attain. This is known at Israel's school as "contracts." Israel also told them about the aversives, the muscle pinches and spanks used in the years before the GED.

Three decades later, P.J. is still at JRC. The callus on his hand smoothed over long ago. After P.J. makes a visit home to Woburn, where they now live, the house is in the same shape it was when he arrived. And no locked cabinets.

When the Biscardis first sent their son to JRC, they liked the paper trail the school created: every action and contract recorded, charted, mailed to them by the stack. "You're talking about chopping down some trees to generate this paper," Peter says. None of P.J.'s earlier schools gave this level of detail. The school also catalogs, on disks, stored footage of P.J. from the omniscient cameras. Some former JRC staffers may not like being monitored, but for Maureen and Peter Biscardi no other school is as transparent. They can view every restraint, every shock, whenever they'd like. And they've asked to do that.

P.J. is on the GED, but he seldom acts out. Maureen had reservations about a stranger's shocking her son—still has them. "I hate the thought of my son getting shocked," she says. "It bothers me terribly. But if you asked me whether I would rather him be shocked for a short period of time or beat himself up or bite himself severely or slice himself up with a razor blade, the answer is simple."

She continues, "We want what's best for our son. Not what's best for JRC." They are not above finding another home for P.J. But no home has been better.


 

Page Next


Change text size
Print

Email

Write a comment
 
 

User comments

Child abuse
Posted by Anonymous | Jul. 1, 2008 at 2:05 PM
COMMENT:
Since when are parents allowed to have their children abused? DSS would intervene in any other situation, if children were being hurt, except at JRI. Why doesn't the Commonwealth force the school to use positive behavioral intervention with the same intensity and staffing numbers and then state knowledgeably whether the behaviors can be modified without punishment.
Since when are parents allowed to have their children abused?
Posted by Anonymous | Jul. 1, 2008 at 10:00 PM
COMMENT:
In response to: Since when are parents allowed to have their children abused? More often than you think. see www.cafety.org
It's time to wake up
Posted by Anonymous | Jul. 3, 2008 at 7:07 AM
COMMENT:
As a family member, professional and advocate for many years, there are many positive ways to deal with the serious challenges of individuals so demanding. The money and the expertise is there. Our state and the people of Massachusetts need to find the will and the outrage to demand change and programs that really meet people's needs as human beings. Our family and many others have been able to do so but not without lots of work, research, advocacy and refusing to take NO as an answer.
Call your legislators
Posted by Bill | Jul. 3, 2008 at 6:51 PM
COMMENT:
Please do more than post message here. Call your state Senators and Representatives (617 722-2000) and express your outrage to them. Advocates have tried unsuccessfully for over 20 years to either ban aversive treatment or have tighter regulations. We need help from voters who are outraged!
Simplistic answers to complicated problems
Posted by Anonymous | Jul. 6, 2008 at 11:02 AM
COMMENT:
Massachusetts is notorious for short-term politically-sensitive solutions to problems that are political nowhere else. When someone develops a program that dependably out-performs JRI, there will be no more JRI. Until then, walk a mile in the shoes of parents who have no other options. Stories like Haleigh Poultre in today's Sunday Globe are not unique. Complicated questions demand complicated answers, unfortunately. Ask any MA baby boomer what state institutions were like prior to community-based treatment. JRI is like Disney World in comparison.
"Oversight" is definitely needed at JRC
Posted by Greg | Jul. 6, 2008 at 1:26 PM
COMMENT:
I am one of the former JRC staff quoted in this article. What is largely missing at JRC is state oversight, where appropriate individuals review the treatments that students are receiving on a regular basis and monitor what treatments are necessary after other methods have been exhausted. Every behavior for which student receives shocks needs to be monitored. Psychologists have left because they were not permitted to use other approaches published in psyciatric journals before resorting to shocks. JRC currently has free reign to shock students for minor behaviors. They use the major behaviors as an excuse, and continue to shock students after progress is made and other methods are available. Example: student shocked for closing his eyes for five seconds AFTER he quit self-abusive and aggressive behaviors and had become pleasant. That is when additional behaviors are stacked on without safegaurds that NEED to be implemented. In addition, nobody seems to monitor the stress of oth
the dehumanization of people with disabilities
Posted by barbara | Jul. 13, 2008 at 2:00 PM
COMMENT:
It is sad to see that Mr. Kix bought into the BRI/JRC brutality, and done his bit to contribute to the dehumanization of people with disabilities. There is no other class of people whose behavior would allow this kind of torture. Furthermore there are more deaths at BRI (omission)than described in this article and Iwata developed the SIBIS at Johns Hopkins (error, one of many) as well as many other errors or omissions. This article is a tragedy. Some of us loved our tough kids enough to work with them and keep trying.
torture
Posted by ellen | Jul. 15, 2008 at 8:38 AM
COMMENT:
Twenty three years ago when I was President of the Autism society in Massachusetts I wrote a letter to the Globe in reference to the BRI abomination. Here is an excerpt:" If I were to threaten to take a dog and shackle it, helmet it, deprive it of food and spray it with ammonia, I would be castigated and hanged by every jury in the land. Perhaps there is an underlying innate prejudice that relegates anything outside the norm to second-class status, and thus experimentation and abuse are viewed with callous indifference." 23 years later and the only thing that has changed is that the torture has been refined to astronomical proportions. Wrap it any package that you like, sanction it with desperate parents, throw a few sanctimonious PHDs at it and it still remains the same. It is torture. Shame on all of us for tolerating this criminal behavior. I thank God that my own son never fell victim to this heinous perversion.
Emotional and Physical Damage Done by Shock
Posted by Kevin | Jul. 18, 2008 at 3:00 PM
COMMENT:
From two whistleblower reports and media coverage I've seen, other autistic children and adults in the vicinity of the person about to be shocked also start screaming in terror when a JRC person reaches for their shock belt as they think that the shock may be meant for them. At times, these autistic people get shocked because they screamed in fear of possibly being shocked. This is barbaric and needs to stop -- as does the heavy drugging of the autistic in other facilities.
torture?
Posted by Anonymous | Aug. 22, 2008 at 12:09 AM
COMMENT:
The last two pages give a really haunting argument for the use of GED. Read it before trying to argue. You can't address the issue by shutting down a solution you don't like. I myself think that if the punishments were less strict, tragedies could be averted. But I wonder how many more tragedies there would be without this torture/aversive treatment solution. Face it, little to no progress has been made in alternative fields. It's not enough to be useful. The GED is. If you actually manage to shut down the JRC or ban aversive treatment, you'd better take responsibility for those autistic, bipolar, troubled kids, because you're taking away their last lifeline.
DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT!
Posted by Anonymous | Sep. 21, 2008 at 11:06 PM
COMMENT:
Those of you who live in the states that regulate these treatment center must contact your government officials and put a stop to this. Call your local newspapers! TV stations! Please help these children. Please become involved.
Horrified To Learn of This
Posted by Anonymous | Sep. 23, 2008 at 11:07 AM
COMMENT:
I can't begin to tell you how shocked and horrified I am by this article. I can't believe this mode of treatment is being used in this age of advanced knowledge and heightened awareness of mental illnesses. I hope that public outrage will have some effect upon the people who are doing these things to human beings who are at the mercy of the system and those who run it.
Former Student
Posted by Anonymous | Oct. 13, 2008 at 4:15 PM
COMMENT:
As a former student who was on the GED, I can honestly attest that JRC is not the horror house the media portrays it to be. I can also attest that Dr. Israel is not the psycho people make him out to be. There are several things about JRC that I disagree with. But in all honesty, JRC gave me my life back. Before JRC, I was in and out of all kinds of placements and I was doped up on meds to the point of oblivion. Once I started at JRC and after the GED was implemented, I began living as normal a life as my disability would allow. The placements I was at prior to JRC told my parents that me graduating from high school and living a normal adult life would be nothing short of a miracle. Once I got to JRC, they told me and my parents that graduating from high school isn't a miracle, its a reality. And they were right, I did wind of graduating and with high honors I might add. It took a little longer and a little more effort than it would most people, but in the end I did it. As far a
Former Student (Continued)
Posted by Anonymous | Oct. 13, 2008 at 4:17 PM
COMMENT:
as the program itself is concerned, there are some things that I disagree with, especially when it comes to how the GED is used. However, if the GED were removed, the results would be nothing short of catastrophic. I do believe that JRC treats some behaviors with the GED that are unnecessary and I do believe that the approval process should a little more rigorous than it currently is. I truly don't believe that the GED is for everyone and I truly don't believe that it should be an common option in treating problem behaviors. However, when the alternative is self inflicted injury or death, being warehoused in hospitals or jails, or being doped up on meds to the point where you can't even recognize your own mother, there is a place for the GED. Kudos to the author for equally presenting both sides of this story which is something that journalist generally neglect to do when reporting about JRC.
that sloppy dresser gives shocks to kids for failing to dress neatly
Posted by KateGladstone | Jan. 7, 2009 at 3:33 AM
COMMENT:
Your article notes the sloppy dress habits of this torture-meister who (according to the procedural manual of the school he founded) requires administering electric shocks to children for "failure to maintain a neat appearance." (Google this phrase plus "JRC" to see documentation of this.) If Doctor Matthew Israel really believes in electric-shock teaching-by-torture as the key to a utopian society of the perfectly behaved, let him strap his machine onto himself and invite staffers and students to administer the punishment he commands for all such breaches.
I was once a staff at JRC
Posted by Marissa | Aug. 19, 2009 at 6:51 AM
COMMENT:
JRC was one of the worst schools you can ever imagine. The children were severely mentally reatarded and autistic, although regardless of this, they have been recieving multiple skin shocks for minor behavior. I mean come on these are people neverless, people with severe disabilitie, and some even none verbal. JRC seemed more like a jail than a school to me as they used transportation restraints on hands and even feet. Real prison like handcuffes, straightjackets, white noise helmets and even four point boards and four point chairs. The disabled persons there had absolutely no freedom, and most whom were constanlty restrained and got skin shocks. I once had to work at a JRC residence (Lorusso) and one of the patients was on the phone with her mother. I was asked to stand near the phone and monitor their conversation. I mean how could that be? Whenever a patient was on the phone his/her conversation had to be monitered. That sounds like no privacy or human rights whatsoever to
Somebody should shut this sicko operation down
Posted by Daniel | Feb. 28, 2010 at 11:23 PM
COMMENT:
By whatever means necessary. Where's the scholarly research showing that these bizarre and cruel methods even work? Certainly the burden of proof for their effectiveness lays on the practitioners, but after 30 years there's zilch in terms of peer-reviewed documentation that this torture actually helps anyone. I don't know how much this quack Israel paid the judges involved, but there's no other explanation for their suspension of moral concern and legal reasoning. I say put this David Koresh-Joseph Mengele monstrosity in front of a jury before he meets a worse fate at the hands of a vigilante mob.
who else
Posted by Anonymous | Mar. 4, 2010 at 12:15 AM
COMMENT:
If JRC did not care who would? They do need to do more to fix the public perception but "SHOCK THERAPY" Sounds so evil even thought it is not even close to ECT. What is to be done with these children let them self destruct or what?

Post a comment

(* = required field.)
  • Please check to make sure that your referer is not blocked.


Subject line of your comment*
Your comments (200 words max)*
Email*
First name*
Last Name*
Enter the code shown below.
Visual CAPTCHA
This helps prevent automated form submissions.
Boston Buzzworthy

FIVE STAR Wealth Managers

Announcing Boston's 2010 FIVE STAR Wealth Managers
 
 

Travel Club Newsletter

Sign-up for our Travel Club email to receive special New England getaway packages.
 
 

Great Seasonal Drinks.

Hit the town and check out some of these amazing cocktails!
 
 

Dental Profiles

Keep your mouth happy and your body healthy. Find Boston’s finest dentists here.
 
 

Medical Profiles

Boston is a hub of world-class healthcare. Take a closer look at some of the area's best doctors here.