LIKE BOSTON MAGAZINE!
Subscribe to Boston Magazine
 
 
 
 

Why Your Doctor Needs a Raise

August 2008
Text Size: A | A | A
 

 

The local primary care crisis runs counter to a national trend: Numbers of generalists per capita began rising in 1979, and grew by 26 percent between 1995 and 2005. The problem, for us, started when those new generalists decided where to build their practices. According to a 2004 study in the journal Health Affairs, a full 80 percent settled in places pretty well stocked with primary care docs.

Many newer generalists are foreign medical graduates recruited specifically to take the place of med students who are no longer interested in the field. (Across all disciplines, an astonishing one out of four doctors in the United States today did his or her training abroad.) Since 1997, the number of American med school graduates who pursue family medicine has dropped by half, meaning that what primary care doctors we have tend not to be educated here. Meanwhile, primary care residencies like the one at Beverly Hospital are shutting down, some for lack of interest among med students. Last year, Joseph Gravel, director of the Tufts University family medicine residency at Cambridge Health Alliance, watched three of his graduates drop out of the primary care track. Gravel was troubled, but he couldn't blame them. "They told me, ‘Dr. Gravel, I hope you don't feel like I'm a sellout,'" he says. "It's an economically bad decision to stay in primary care."

Across the country, the average salary for primary care providers has come up since 2004, but not much; it's now somewhere between $160,000 and $175,000. That's a decent wage for sure, but nothing compared to what young docs can make if they opt for specialized training, particularly in the fields that med students alternately refer to as "lifestyle specialties" and "the ROAD"— radiology, ophthalmology, anesthesiology, and dermatology—where salaries can top $400,000.

The disparity is felt even more keenly in urban areas like Boston, where the cost of living is high and salaries for primary care docs tend to be lower than the national average, at around $156,000. "If you have highly technical health problems, Boston is a wonderful place to get care," says Gravel. "But primary care hasn't been as valued in Boston as in other places. There's been a pretty large lack of attention paid to things that aren't glitzy—standard, basic stuff, like whether people are getting their Pap smears or hypertension treatments."

Doctors' salaries are determined largely by how much Medicare reimburses them for the work they do, a system that puts specialists at an advantage. A specialist's job often consists of doing procedures, scans, and tests that are easily measured, and most of which can be done quickly these days, thanks to improvements in technology. But a generalist's work is in some ways more complex. It requires extensively studying a patient's history, calling nurses and family members, searching journals to figure out which ailment out of thousands could be in play, plus checking, updating, and managing a blizzard of paperwork. Medicare doesn't pay doctors for any of that. The only reimbursement a primary care doc gets is for the time he or she spends sitting across from a patient, and even that time isn't particularly well compensated: A half-hour visit in Boston brings in a little over $100 in Medicare payments, about a fourth of what some specialists get for the same amount of time. Private insurance doesn't pay much better, and actually values specialists over generalists even more than Medicare policy does.

The process for setting these reimbursement rates is, not surprisingly, a bureaucratic nightmare, but the salient point is this: The doctors who sit on the committee that sets the rates are almost overwhelmingly specialists. Put it all together, and it's a miracle primary care docs make any money at all.
Of course, none of this is the kind of thing that doctors, especially generalists, are supposed to gripe about, at least not in public. Compared with a lot of people, even the lowest-paid doctors don't have very compelling financial complaints. After they're done with their residencies, they make four times the salary of the average American worker. Besides, in the medical profession in general (to say nothing of Brahmin Boston in particular), it's unseemly to be seen with your hand out. Instead, doctors are supposed to act in a noble spirit, as if they're above monetary concerns. A doctor's services are often treated as literally invaluable, as so important for the welfare of other human beings that they shouldn't be associated with anything as tawdry as a price tag. But doctors are people. Like the rest of us, they do care about money, especially when they're saddled with med school debt that can reach up to a quarter-million dollars.


 
PAGE 1 | 2 | 3   Next
 
 

User Comments:

we NEED MORE SPECIALISTS
Posted by Anonymous | Jul. 29, 2008 at 5:49 PM
COMMENT:
Yes Primary care's are underpaid. So are all doctors. They could have easily chosen other better paid professions and many people now are. Don't make the mistake of thinking we have too many specialists and that they are over paid. We would fix a lot of problems if we tripled the number of specialist and trained nurses to appropriately refer. SPECIALIST FIX THE PROBLEM -that is why they are paid for thier skill.
Improving compensation and delivery model is the answer
Posted by Anonymous | Jul. 29, 2008 at 7:13 PM
COMMENT:
EXCELLENT overview of the various factors contributing to health care access issue. We need more physicians in general. Interestingly,there is data that shows that in areas where there is a higher per capita of specialists and a paucity of internists, mortaility is higher. Additionally, in other countries with a more developed primary care or medical home model, the health outcomes are better than in the U.S. and less money is spent on health care. At the very least, we need to get alot more bang ( better health outcomes) for our buck (health care expenditures). Primary care physicians are specialists in their individual patients ; thus, I agree we do need more specialists who can contribute to the problem of health care access.
How about psychiatrists?
Posted by Anonymous | Jul. 29, 2008 at 9:25 PM
COMMENT:
Psychiatrists arein the same boat plus they have to live with the 'Carve Out' system. Physician incomes need some parity.
an alternative...
Posted by boston | Jul. 30, 2008 at 6:14 AM
COMMENT:
Nice article. I'd just like to add that if you want to increase the percentage of medical students choosing primary care careers, there's an alternative to raising primary care incomes: you can also reduce certain specialist incomes to achieve parity (especially those specialties that do procedures and imaging). This approach has the appeal of not steering additional money to a group that already enjoys a high income, all things considered (the only problem with PCP income is that it's low _relative_ to specialist income). Unfortunately Massachusetts can't really do income reduction on its own--specialists could just go to other states or limit their practices to Medicare patients, for whom fees are nationally generated. To pursue an income reduction strategy, you need a national strategy. Then the specialists will have nowhere to run.
Another area to fix?
Posted by Anonymous | Jul. 30, 2008 at 7:10 AM
COMMENT:
Nice article. I agree that medical students are choosing more lucrative medical specialties in part because of the tremendous amount of educational debt that they have incurred. Perhaps another area of focus should be on how to decrease this debt. Students may be willing to do primary care if this debt is lessened. In this article, I do not hear that subspecialists are overpaid. It seems really to be dealing with primary care issues. Subspecialists are working hard like the rest of us.
Improving the delivery model, continued
Posted by Anonymous | Jul. 30, 2008 at 8:32 AM
COMMENT:
I work in an academic center and have great supports and subspecialist network, although I can tell you the specialists are stretched thin too, here, and especially the pediatric ones. I get paid less than industry salary but I could live with that if I had more time to spend with patients. You cannot give adequate care to a patient on 15 meds with 5 different chronic medical issues in 15-20 minutes, but that is what the system demands we do! If I do not meet the hospital quota of "patients per hour per room" and the national residency credentialling committee quota of given number of residents per patient, I will lose my job AND our residency. Contrary to what many patients may think, my interest is not financial but good care for my patients. But I am NOT in control of the volume I see. I don't think healthcare consumers have near enough understanding of the constraints doctors are under.
Finding doctors
Posted by Anonymous | Jul. 31, 2008 at 6:37 PM
COMMENT:
The American public will learn that you get the doctor care you are willing to pay for. Doctor reimbursement has not increased since 1992. The future is less time per patient, more physician extenders (PAs) giving the care, and no attatchment to one physician within a group.If you want different, you will have to pay for it outside of your HMO, or other third party payer.
More specialist save lives
Posted by i | Jul. 31, 2008 at 7:03 PM
COMMENT:
1) you think its hard to see your PCP? what did you have talk about- are you still alive after 4months of waiting? seriously- many people "over use" the system 2)I have upset patients because they can't get into to see me with THEIR DIAGNOSED CANCER for several weeks. And guess who is going to treat them. Yes you really should discourage people from going into specialty medicine and definitely cut our salaries, because at 80 hours week, occasional 18 hour days, waking up in the middle of the night drive into the hospital to operate for emergent conditions- yes I really am overpaid. Most people- even the ones I know- have a very poor appreciation of what exactly a specialist does- but I suspect you are finding out with your husband. (by the way- it does not get easier after residency, it gets harder...) 3) By the way- do you know what the divorce rate is for surgeons- since you are married to one. People often forget or ignore the personal cost to surgical specialist. 4)Most of the
Medical costs
Posted by Anonymous | Aug. 1, 2008 at 2:11 AM
COMMENT:
I am a specialist. Due to the incredible inefficiency of our medical system (administrative nightmare, defensive medicine, etc) probably less than half of each dollar goes to paying for actual physicians care. The rest goes to fund insurance company paperwork, HIPAA compliance and other amenities that clearly we cannot afford. Americans have to decide what they want to pay for: absolute privacy, right to sue, etc. or doctors care. You can't have all, its not such a mystery. Imagine implementing HIPAA in the face of rising costs, how naiave can the system be, and this is just one item.
Are there pages 2 and 3 of this article?
Posted by Anonymous | Aug. 1, 2008 at 9:00 PM
COMMENT:
Couldn't find the follow-up pages to the article.
Scratching the Surface...
Posted by Anonymous | Aug. 1, 2008 at 8:08 PM
COMMENT:
Finally, this issue is being addressed. For the folks suggesting that specialists should be paid less, they obviously didn't think about pediatric specialists. I know of PLENTY of pedi "ologists" who are taking a pay cut after three years of training post residency to be given a salary significantly less than the average primary care pediatrician. I have watched this state hemorrhage pediatric specialists, primary care doc's, and even the ROAD specialists due to housing costs, costs of living, and managed care issues. A number of them were in my medical school class! I know certain institutions are trying to make it better, but I'm afraid it may be too late. Some suggestions. Have the federal government pay for medical school, reimburse providers for time, patient complexity, and procedure, and get a state by state single payer system that actually pays fairly, is run competently, covers medicines/procedures without novels of paperwork, and adjusts with cost of living. Pro
A Healthy Society
Posted by Anonymous | Aug. 5, 2008 at 11:43 AM
COMMENT:
Thank you for addressing such an important topic. Barbara Starfield at Johns Hopkins has conducted many studies showing that a higher density of primary care physicians brings with it better overall health of that population. To maximize the health of our society we need to invest in primary care and that means parity in salary for primary care physicians. Money equals value in our society and if we want a healthy society, we need to value the primary care doctors that provide population health.
Huh
Posted by Anonymous | Aug. 13, 2008 at 2:40 PM
COMMENT:
They are not underpaid and my experience was that it was quite easy to get an appointment with a good primary care physician.
GIVE ME A BREAK
Posted by CYNIC | Aug. 13, 2009 at 9:23 AM
COMMENT:
Doctors are greedy animals who are in it only for the money. They are worse than lawyers and dentists. All doctors should be paid less. Let's pay the teachers and police officers more.
Right on the (lack of) money
Posted by Anonymous | Dec. 29, 2009 at 12:43 PM
COMMENT:
Believe it or not, this problem is going to get a lot bigger as the population ages. An enormous amount of care that is provided by specialists today could have been prevented by a more thorough relationship between patients and PCPs ten years ago. That's not my opinion, it's research. So when you look at a predominantly aging population that has a fairly poor track record of PCP visits in the recent past and present, where do you think the state of health care is going to be in ten to fifteen years? We're letting go of the most cost-effective means of providing healthcare - prevention - in favor of all-too-late specialist intervention. Will the system crumble? No, probably not - but it will cost FAR more money to fix if we don't address PCP shortages now. To all of those who think PCPs are overpaid - go ahead, stick to your guns. But when the healthcare system becomes inefficient, untenable, and a total financial quagmire, go ahead and give yourselves a nice big pat on the back. Tr
 
Boston Buzzworthy

Guide to Colleges and Universities 2012

Your guide to finding the right college and university from the publishers of Boston magazine in association with the New England Board of Higher Education.
 
 

Best of Boston 2011 iPhone App

For your iPhone: Keep the city's best restaurants, shops and services at your fingertips! Browse five years of winners including our brand-new 2010 list. Click here to download now!
 
 

Dental Profiles

A healthy smile says so much. This section includes some of Boston's finest dentists specializing in a variety of fields.
 
 

Medical Profiles

It's no secret that Boston is a hub of world-class healthcare. With this guide, you'll be able to make informed decisions about your healthcare when the time comes.
 
 
 
This text is replaced by the Flash movie.
 
 

To view this page, you must be using Internet Explorer 7 or higher. Please visit microsoft.com for more information.