Feature Article

A Philistine in the Shingle Museum

By Sasha Issenberg

Page 6 of 6


Nearly a year and a half later, no one at the Historic District Commission has any idea what’s going on at 105 Main Street, beyond the white lights that bedecked it at Christmas and the American flag and bunting that occasionally appear outside. Mark Voigt speculates that the chimney is gone altogether from the interior—he points to a metal lip curled over the top of the stack that suggests it has been repurposed as a different sort of exhaust—and believes that when DeSeta rebuilt the walls, he did so with new lumber. (One person involved in construction says the frame, sacrilegiously, now includes steel, too.) Edward DeSeta declined to show the interior to Boston magazine, either, or answer any questions about the controversy, saying only that “it’s a beautiful house, we love it, and we’d rather be private with our home.”

This March, the commission withdrew its proposed change to the town’s home-rule laws that would have extended its control over a building’s entire historic structure, including interior elements such as chimneys and framing. And Roggeveen has come around to something approaching praise for DeSeta’s renovations to the home’s exterior, which, after all, were all done with the commission’s approval. “Ten years from now, when it’s really weathered, you won’t know the difference from outside. If it were a brand-new house, we’d all be singing his praises,” he said on a recent Tuesday in his office, as he waited for a HDC meeting to begin. Still, he has not given up on using the whole episode as a way to try to influence future remodelers. Once the commission has depleted its current stock of Building with Nantucket in Mind, it will print a new edition, with a cover that will likely not picture the door frame from 105 Main. “He put a lighted doorbell next to it,” says Roggeveen, “which I find cheesy.”

Originally published in Boston magazine, October 2007
 

Page | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | Return to the beginning


Change text size
Print

Email

Write a comment
 
 

User comments

A Philistine in the Shingle Museum
Posted by Elizabeth | Oct. 15, 2007 at 7:17 AM
COMMENT:
In making their home on the island, the DeSetas spent a lot of money to restore an old Nantucket house which was ready to fall into ruin. The good people of Nantucket ought to appreciate the fact that the exterior of the house is attractive and historically appropriate (with the minute exception of the lighted doorbel), though it has not been so for quite a few years. I was alarmed to read the quote by Mr. Roggeveen: "We don't know what is going on inside the house". I am sympathetic to Nantucket residents, who strive to maintain the island's quaint beauty, but not with their wish to control what goes on inside anyone's home. It is simply none of their business. No one should have to put up with rotten boards or crumbling masonry because of some neighbor's fond memories of an earlier time in the house. I wonder if, when my circa 1970 ranch-style house is 300 years old (assuming it survives), the preservationists will insist upon re-installing the wall-to-wall gold shag carpet...[shu
Common ground
Posted by Rex | Nov. 12, 2007 at 7:40 PM
COMMENT:
I feel particularly privileged to have been involved in this project. The overriding lesson here for me was one of compromise. There were always two distinctly opposing voices which dominated the social dialogue, voices which, in order for the project to proceed, would need to find common ground. One voice was saying, ‘we have a constitutional right to protect and preserve our privately owned property,’ while the other was saying, ‘by altering this building you are destroying the fabric of Nantucket.’ One thing was clear and certain; the house was in desperate need of service which I attested to during our review meetings. There was great effort, and great expense, taken to preserve much of the original frame and materials. Where new materials were provided, original details were copied (again at great expense). This effort was balanced with providing a safe and lasting structure and rectifying inherent life safety issues. Rex Ingram Architect
Common ground
Posted by rex | Nov. 12, 2007 at 8:49 PM
COMMENT:
As our renovation is nearly completed, it could be said that 105 Main has many of its original ‘bones’ intact, attesting to its unique architectural heritage on Nantucket. But, it is not the same house of c.1680. How can it be? Rex Ingram, Architect
WOW!
Posted by John | Nov. 29, 2007 at 9:43 AM
COMMENT:
Are people so unhappy with their lives today that the must constantly romanticize the past. It seems to me that the Hysterical Societies of the United States would rather see a vacant lot with a plaque announcing the building of the past than see someone renovate and save it.

Post a comment

(* = required field.)
  • Please check to make sure that your referer is not blocked.


Subject line of your comment*
Your comments (200 words max)*
Email*
First name*
Last Name*
Enter the code shown below.
Visual CAPTCHA
This helps prevent automated form submissions.
 
Boston Buzzworthy

Travel Club Newsletter

Sign-up for our Travel Club email to receive special New England getaway packages.