LIKE BOSTON MAGAZINE!
Subscribe to Boston Magazine
 
 
 

Single By Choice

When it comes to getting hitched, more Americans than ever before are saying "I don't." Singles now make up nearly half the adult population in this country, and new research suggests they’re happier, more social, and more active in the community than many of their wedded counterparts. Now if only their friends and family (and oh, while we're at it, coworkers, benefits providers, and the federal government) would get off their back.

January 2012
Text Size: A | A | A
 

IF YOU'VE BEEN SINGLE long enough, then you probably have one: a story of such jaw-dropping cluelessness that you shake your head as you retell it. Eva’s happened during Christmas, at her job at a financial office in downtown Boston. The perpetrator: her boss. After he handed out a bottle of wine to every other employee in her department, Eva unwrapped a small bar of soap with a cat sticker on it, and an accompanying mug that said “Everything Tastes Better with Cat Hair in It.”

“I was speechless,” she says now, breaking into a laugh. “The crazy cat lady is really not what you want to be perceived as.” Eva’s sitting in her home in Roslindale, a tidy four-bedroom from the late 1880s that she’s renovated and decorated with retro-chic ’50s-style prints. Her Chihuahua, Alex, slumps lazily in her lap while Shelby, the white Persian cat in question, saunters by her feet. It’s late afternoon, and the golden light refracting through the bay window of her living room gives the house next door a Hopperesque glow. Across the way, you can see her neighbors’ domesticity playing out through their window like the opening sequence of a sitcom: children running across the kitchen with their backpacks, a mother preparing dinner at the stove. But at 51, Eva says she wants no part in any of that. She’s never been married, has never craved children, and has no interest in settling down with anyone in the foreseeable future. The one thing she would like is for everyone else to just accept that she’s happy that way.

Most people don’t need a mug to remind them that they’re single. Amy, 38, says that between the tabloids and television, she can’t escape it. She sometimes wishes she’d gotten hitched — even if it were just for 72 days like Kim Kardashian — if only to get people off her back. “People want you to have reached these major life goals that they’ve reached, and they want you to be like them,” she says. “But I don’t need a man in my life to make me happy.” Steve, who’s 43 and hails from Lexington but now works in L.A., says remaining single has put ­distance between him and his married friends. When he returns home, he finds them so focused on their kids they can’t have a conversation. All right, he tells himself, I’ll give them a call in 10 years. Tara, who’s 38 and doesn’t want to get married, ended up in an argument with her brother-in-law over Thanksgiving about whether having kids meant your life was automatically busier than a single person’s could ever be. “Your whole life is you!” he shouted. That was the end of the conversation.

In the past decade, increased public support for gay marriage and a growing acceptance of domestic partnerships has helped to redefine what it means to be a couple — and a family — in this country. But what do we make of a person who remains single by choice? Our politically correct culture keeps us from voicing our judgments about people based on skin color, ethnicity, gender, or orientation. Yet we’re quite comfortable telling people that they’ll be better off when they’ve found someone to share their life with. That’s in part because we’re constantly being told that happiness and success come through our partnerships.

But what happens to that logic when more of us than ever before are going it alone?

The 2010 U.S. Census found that nearly half of all American adults — 100 million — are now single, the highest rate in recent history, and 61 percent of them have never married. Here in Boston, 59 percent of men and 55 percent of women have never walked down the aisle, which has us out-singling New York, Chicago, and Los Angeles. And while those stats reflect both our sizable student population and our professional aspirations — our median marrying age, hovering around 30, is among the highest in the nation — it’s also a reflection of national trends. In 1960, 15 percent of American adults had never been married. By 2010, that had nearly doubled to 28 percent. The census also found that for the first time since it started counting, married couples now make up less than half of American households. In all, 31 million Americans live alone. And in Massachusetts, 41 percent of singles rent apartments by themselves, while a quarter put down welcome mats in front of homes they own.

Photo by Chad Griffith


 
PAGE 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7   Next
 
 

User Comments:

Interesting, but...
Posted by Anonymous | Jan. 3, 2012 at 1:32 PM
COMMENT:
(1) Very little material here from avowed single people who also have children; (2) Making your point with a beautiful woman like Trespicio on the cover is easy; try finding a flabby 66-year-old diabetic who fits the bill and putting him on the cover; (3) Easy to be single when you're well-educated. Find someone who's a high school dropout to preach the glories of singleness.
last sentence is awkward
Posted by Sean | Jan. 3, 2012 at 2:32 PM
COMMENT:
loved the article, but the last sentence, "I’m just sorry that people who are married don’t have that freedom" is confusing. it implies stereotyping married people in the same way that the rest of the article wishes single people wouldn't be stereotyped. it's also borderline degrading, which i think is a mis-edit of some sort, and perhaps landed on the "last word" position by accident. just sounds really out of place given the rest of the article - i think it'd be better without it. imho.
Comment.
Posted by Anonymous | Jan. 3, 2012 at 2:33 PM
COMMENT:
Ms. Trespicio may crow about the delights of singlehood, but I think she is simply in denial. I have known her for years, and I believe that her single state is due primarily to the fact that despite her undeniable, beauty, brains, and charm, it quickly became clear to me ( and I suspect many other men ) that she is a also a rather mercenary opportunist. Sometimes a cigar really is just a cigar.
Methinks Anonymous Doth Protest Too Much
Posted by Anonymous | Jan. 3, 2012 at 11:46 PM
COMMENT:
I've known Anonymous for years, and I think he's in denial of his insecurity in the face of someone who has no use for him. Sometimes an ego is just an ego.
all the single men
Posted by Stephanie | Jan. 4, 2012 at 10:00 AM
COMMENT:
I was confused and turned off by the lack of interviews of single men. There was no explanation as to why Boston Magazine only interviewed single women, even though the statistics presented showed a similarly significant percentage of single men.
us marrieds aren't necessarily uncool, folks
Posted by Anonymous | Jan. 4, 2012 at 10:19 AM
COMMENT:
I've noticed quite a number of pro-single articles in various publications (the most visible was in the Atlantic a few months ago) recently, and it makes me a little uncomfortable. I'm recently married. My husband and I are very happy, though probably not any more so than when we were just living together. We got married because it felt like the right thing for us. I am very, very independent, and I didn't choose marriage because it was what I was supposed to do, but because it was what made sense. Now, this spate of pro-single articles makes me feel a little like these cool, awesome progressive singles might look down on someone like me, who chose to get married. Just like the singles don't want to feel like us marrieds look down on them, I don't want to feel like I'm automatically perceived as being less progressive, independent, or even subsumed by the patriarchy. I applaud any efforts to make people feel good about the life choices they make, but let's try to frame it as different strokes for different folks.
Lauren
Posted by Anonymous | Jan. 4, 2012 at 9:35 PM
COMMENT:
Interesting and well written article, however I do find that last line, “I’m just sorry that people who are married don’t have that freedom,” jarring. Who’s to say they don’t? The article also seems to assume that all married people do/will have children and all single people don’t/won’t, which is just as bad as assuming all people do/will get married.
Many, many reasons to be single....
Posted by Brett | Jan. 5, 2012 at 7:30 AM
COMMENT:
The author wrote a nice piece but I think that it still shows only a good side to the single world. My brother-in-law is still single at 44 and almost got married once. He bailed out at the last minute and has gone back to his womanizing ways. He is hopping from bed to bed and has absolutely no problem finding someone to warm his sheets. He could literally find a different woman every night if he wanted and could keep up.
I'm just not the marryin' kind
Posted by Pat | Jan. 6, 2012 at 8:09 AM
COMMENT:
After two long (10 and 14 years) and failed marriages, I woke up and realized I'm just not, well, the marryin' kind. At first, I was horrified and thought that something was terribly wrong with me, but as I got a better view inside my married friends' marriages, I realized that marriage is not all it's cracked up to be. I just thought it was I who couldn't keep it together. Many keep it together even though they are sad, angry, and depleted. That's not a way to live. Yeah, it's problematic sometimes, being single, but I could not go back to the feeling of being "owned" ever again. Ever. Never.
Been there
Posted by Ron | Jan. 6, 2012 at 10:54 AM
COMMENT:
There is happy and unhappy in all walks of life and all statuses. I personally was single until I married (at an age older than average) and love being married and really never liked being single. I know many singles (who have never tried the marriage part like I have) who nevertheless find themselves happy in their status. I know many marrieds (or formerly marrieds) who were quite distressed in marriage. I know many singles who would rather be married. As for the government sponsored benefits to married - look more carefully. There was a time that being married and earning two incomes resulted in what was referred to as the "marriage penalty." I know at least one couple (stil together) that became legally divorced in order to avoid that penalty. Also there are other tax benefits that I cannot reap, if it distresses you, become active in trying to change the sytem. That's the end of my analysis. Cheers, all.
New Words Needed
Posted by Kathleen | Jan. 7, 2012 at 12:23 PM
COMMENT:
About this: "increased public support for gay marriage and a growing acceptance of domestic partnerships has helped to redefine what it means to be a couple — and a family — in this country." I would disagree. The definitions of family and couple (in the sense of romantic partners) have never changed. They are what they are. It is people who are using the words incorrectly and out-of-context. They should find their own vocabulary to describe their non-family and non-couple situations.
Finally, someone speaking up for singles
Posted by Anonymous | Jan. 7, 2012 at 3:53 PM
COMMENT:
Loved this article. I am so tired of everyone thinking that if you're single, then there is something wrong with you. But as the article points out, while single people may be perfectly content with their choice, we are discriminated against in many ways. We pay higher taxes. We pay twice as much to take a cruise or go on a tour. In restaurants, we are often seated at undesirable tables or receive subpar service because it's assumed we won't tip well. Even Amtrak joined the travel fray by eliminating a class of sleeper called the "Economy Slumbercoach" which was priced and sized perfectly for a solo traveler. And I know many single who try to buy a new car, often to be asked if their "spouse" would be joining them. Businesses pay heed. We are a huge, untapped market.
On Single women
Posted by Anonymous | Jan. 9, 2012 at 3:55 AM
COMMENT:
Lest not forget, there is a one word term for Single woman which is Spinster !
www.camaxo.com
Posted by Gail | Jan. 9, 2012 at 7:41 AM
COMMENT:
It is understandable. If i would be a married woman living with a husband whom i am not happy with, I would be unhappy, But if i would be alone but surrounded with people who love me and i love them, who are close to me and by my side each time i need them, of course i am healthier.
Stop discriminating against single people
Posted by Anonymous | Jan. 9, 2012 at 11:03 AM
COMMENT:
I work at a major institution in the Boston area. I have both raised children in my family and am now caring for elderly relatives. None of this matters to my employers because (1) I'm not married; (2) I didn't willfully create the people I'm caring for. Ironically, the only time you get cut slack by HR and your colleagues is when you consciously choose to bring other human beings into the world and then decide it's someone else's problem to take care of them. I'm so sick of people assuming that because I'm single, I have a completely flexible schedule, I have have extra time to organize bridal and baby showers, I always have extra cash to put into an envelope of donations for someone in the division, etc. I'm made more sacrifices in life (including puttting siblings through school at my expense and nursing relatives into their graves and paying for their funerals)than most people. But because I'm single, I'm considered the "selfish" and "care-free" staff member. The only way this will change is for single people to demand their rights. Colleagues who have created families don't deserve to have their health care or anything else subsidized by singles...
Miserable singles
Posted by Anonymous | Jan. 9, 2012 at 11:10 PM
COMMENT:
I have been married for 10 years and am in my early 30's. All the single people that we know in there 30's and early 40's go through various phases of loving the single life and hating it. Most are very confused and insecure...If this trend continues get ready for an increase in senior citizen suicide...Being single for life is a gift of grace that most people don't have...
Nancy
Posted by Nancy | Jan. 10, 2012 at 2:41 PM
COMMENT:
Ummmm...this looks very familiar..check out the article by Kate Bolick in The Atlantic that was published recently: click here I mean, it a free world, but the article, picture, the whole thing is a bit..well..I guess "imitation is the best compliment". This is a HUGE compliment.
Brother in law
Posted by Anonymous | Jan. 14, 2012 at 11:04 AM
COMMENT:
Tara's brother in law sounds like a real neanderthal!
Superficial and avoids huge issues
Posted by Anonymous | Jan. 15, 2012 at 6:57 PM
COMMENT:
This article borders on fluff. Citing several studies to support its almost completely one-sided arguments, this article tries to appear researched and "sciencey", but it totally lacks investigation into the many layers of life situations and psychological underpinnings (and consequences) that have those 100 million Americans being single today. And it completely avoids the issue of sex, and sex and diseases. There is for example a current-day upsurge in STDs, from the clap to HIV, in urban, suburban, and rural settings. How's them apples, singletons? I'm not moralizing, just pointing out that all is not well in single-land. And I agree with another reader that the article focuses far too much on single women, and has a huge gap about single men. The single life seems to favor single men, for so many obvious reasons I am exhausted just thinking about them -- from financial considerations to the ability to be scot-free jumping from one bed to the next w/o judgment or consequence. Not to mention that men and women tend to "attach" completely differently emotionally when sex gets involved. Again, not moralizing, just pointing out a deep issue completely ignored by this article. People are...
Thumbs down to fake hipness
Posted by Anonymous | Jan. 15, 2012 at 8:37 PM
COMMENT:
I say thumbs down to this article which poses as hip zeitgeist. A loving and supportive partnership takes hard work, dedication, compromise, and is ultimately incredibly rewarding. People relying on each other and supporting each other in binaries shouldn't be undervalued -- just as supportive social networks of friends and relatives are also to be highly valued. Sadly, many singles are narcissistic (raised in the "me" generation) and play their hurtful games in a society that largely frees them from the stigma of being single. Many singles are in denial of their deepest fears and emptinesses and find no reason to work on those; they then visit their pain on others in unending cycles of unkindnesses and deceptions, making a whole generation of cheaters and the cheated, thus perpetuating the pain and the fear. And an entire generation of men has been in training, with the singleness phenom, to be consummate smooth-talkers and charmers, a cheesy trick I hoped had gone out with the 70s, but is now revived by the "single is hip" narrative.
Too simplistic.
Posted by Anonymous | Jan. 18, 2012 at 8:49 AM
COMMENT:
I have to agree with the poster who said this is fluff. It reads like a piece in which the reporter was assigned a story about how being single was great and used almost exclusively material that support this idea. I'm one of those singletons in my 30s and in my experience, there are pros and cons to being single and being in partnership. Sure, you might give up some freedom in a partnership, but I can't help but wonder if what you gain is worth it.
A correlation
Posted by Lydia | Jan. 19, 2012 at 10:48 AM
COMMENT:
This struck me as interesting: singles v. marrieds, us v. them...sound familiar? Isolating an individual or a group of individuals or labelling them based upon a trait that is different than one you posess is wrong.
To the "Thumbs down" poster...
Posted by Anonymous | Jan. 20, 2012 at 1:03 PM
COMMENT:
Both marrieds AND singles should be respected, and your comments were nothing more than an ignorant, bigoted screed painting singles with a broad brush. If I had caved into such attitudes and become coupled, I wouldn't have achieved my own professional and artistic triumphs that have been so fulfilling to me.
Single by Choice
Posted by Katie | Jan. 25, 2012 at 11:55 AM
COMMENT:
I just wanted to thank Boston and Janelle Nanos for this article. Nanos covered all the base - the prejudices and stereotypes we face, as well as the 'greedy' couples mentality that permeates our culture. I agree that it would have been nice to have more male voices, and that singles should be careful not to be judgmental towards couples (though I agree with that final quote and am glad they used it). And gladder still that they put an attractive woman on the cover - it demonstrates better than anything that we are not all homely 'cat ladies'
karma?
Posted by Anonymous | Jan. 28, 2012 at 12:20 PM
COMMENT:
I hate to say so but I see a s**t sandwich or two in Ms. Trespicio's future. When you play the braggadocio and hold forth on the perfection that is your life in a glossy magazine, higher powers tend to lay the smackdown on your smug little self.
This post has been removed.
Posted by Anonymous | Feb. 2, 2012 at 7:32 AM
COMMENT:
single with kids
Posted by Anonymous | Feb. 2, 2012 at 2:06 PM
COMMENT:
I think perhaps there is a reason that this article neglected to mention single people with kids because if you have kids, you aren't technically single. You still have lives to worry about, you have to schedule your own life around those little people. I realize it is not the same as having a partner in marriage, but just my opinion on why they left it out.
Contrarian perspective
Posted by Anonymous | Feb. 14, 2012 at 11:41 AM
COMMENT:
As other commentators have mentioned, lots of fluff here. Nevertheless, there is one aspect that no permanently single (never married, non-reproductive) person could comprehend, and therefore their opinions have little validity towards. And that is the aspect of producing and "raising" ones own children to adulthood. As a now aged father, who first started to make children long after (according to my wife) my "shelf life expiration date" had past, I now understand fully all the fears, frustrations, and joys that fatherhood entails. Whether being the mother or the father, it is an "experience" that can only be achieved by doing it, not by "theorizing" about it (either for or against). And, I am not disparaging anyone who consciously does not want to experience it. But I do disparage those who do decide, long after their "shelf life expiration date" has past, that they do want to experience parenthood, in the usual biological manner. I should not be expected to pay taxes for the rest of my life to sustain their "choice" because it is incapable of sustaining itself in adulthood, let alone childhood!
Single and Happy
Posted by Anonymous | Feb. 15, 2012 at 5:15 PM
COMMENT:
I'm 38, single, and choose to be single. I was a community health aid worker for a number years. I traveled into war torn areas, and helped the citizens recover. I wouldn't trade one minute of that experience for marriage or children. Its what I wanted to do with my life. As a consequence, it lead to singleness. The older I become I realize, actually like it and gives me freedom. I think some people do single very well, and others may do marriage very well. I think a lot of people should remain single because unfortunately people choose marriage out of insecurity and doubt. Lots of my friends literally married the first person that asked them. They didn't marry for love, really didn't 'like' the person, but doubted their future. Wondering if anyone else would ask, they didn't want to end up alone, don't know what they wanted for their future, dependent upon others, etc....No wonder we have such a high divorce rate. Know people that have remained single because they know they would be horrible at marriage or selfish. Many different reasons people make decisions to remain single or to marry. Both are good and right...
 
 

To view this page, you must be using Internet Explorer 7 or higher. Please visit microsoft.com for more information.