Scott Lively: The Crusader

Lively made headlines after an incendiary visit to Uganda when he urged leaders to fight the ‘gay agenda.’ Soon after, a member of the country’s Parliament called for the execution of some homosexuals. Activists are now suing Lively for persecution. What’s next for the Springfield pastor? Exploring a run for governor, of course.

Anti-Scott Lively Protest

An anti-Lively protest outside of Holy Grounds.

Encouraged by the response to his essay, Lively decided to write a book on the subject, The Pink Swastika, published with coauthor Kevin Abrams in 1995. “While we cannot say that homosexuals caused the Holocaust,” they wrote, “we must not ignore their central role in Nazism. To the myth of the ‘pink triangle’—the notion that all homosexuals in Nazi Germany were persecuted—we must respond with the reality of the ‘pink swastika.’”

Lively was well aware of what publishing The Pink Swastika would mean for him. “I knew when I sat down to write that book,” he told me, “that if I crossed this line and actually published this, that I’m sort of sacrificing any future I could have in the mainstream world, because it’s so radical and will bring such incredible hostility…. At the same time, I had a sense of being self-sacrificing.”

And, indeed, Lively has been vilified for writing the book. Citing it, for example, the Southern Poverty Law Center has added Lively’s Abiding Truth Ministries, which he founded in 1997, to its list of hate groups. But the book found its audience, as Lively knew it would. Now in its fifth edition, it has been printed in five languages and has become a popular manifesto in the anti-gay movement. “The Pink Swastika is a landmark book,” says Bryan Fischer, the host of Focal Point, a conservative radio show that reaches roughly a million people each week. “I feel it [contains] a message that needs to be disseminated. If it was not an influential book, it would simply be ignored. Instead, the Left rails against it. And that alone is a sign of the enormous influence he’s had on the public debate over homosexuality.”

Around the time the book came out, Lively left Oregon and moved to California, where he not only launched Abiding Truth Ministries, which he claims is one of the first Christian organizations devoted exclusively to opposing homosexuality, but also went to law school. After becoming a lawyer, he began to travel abroad, preaching his anti-gay message, and in 2002 made his first trip to Uganda. He broke into Eastern Europe in 2006, he says, when he was invited to speak about the “gay agenda” at a conference in Riga, Latvia, hosted by the New Generation Church, a global evangelical ministry based in the city. The following year he visited Lithuania, where he began to make his political influence felt. Rimvydas Baltaduonis, of the Tolerant Youth Association in Lithuania, says that prior to Lively’s visit, nobody in the country was talking about the “threat” of homosexuality. Then Lively showed up, announcing, as he himself would later put it, that “discrimination against homosexual behavior is necessary.” During that period, a censorship bill aimed at keeping information about homosexuality away from children was introduced into Parliament. The bill passed in 2009, despite a presidential veto.


This past fall, curious about what Lively had been up to since his Uganda trip, I reached out to him. Wary of the media, he nevertheless agreed to talk, and invited me to come meet him in Springfield. I paid him a series of visits, during which he spoke to me openly about his past, his beliefs, and his ambitions. Despite the aggressive posture he often adopts publicly, I found him to be easygoing and affable. As we talked, however, he stuck firmly to his controversial beliefs. When we parted, he forgave me in advance for what I might say about him.

Unlike many evangelicals who oppose homosexuality, Lively has no interest in softening his rhetoric or scaling back his activism in response to the remarkable shift in public opinion toward the acceptance of gays that this country has witnessed during the past decade. When I mentioned that his views might offend or hurt people, he expressed no sympathy. “Grow up,” he responded. “Get over it.”

This kind of attitude, not to mention the negative media attention he has received, only makes Lively more of a champion to those on the anti-gay fringe, who admire his willingness to stand up and act in the name of his beliefs. “To us,” says Bryan Fischer, the conservative radio host, “Scott Lively is a hero. He’s shown courage, he’s shown bravery, and he’s refused to retreat in the face of hostile fire. He is the homosexual lobby’s number-one target. And he is an inspiration.”

Lively told me that after he returned to Springfield he decided to pay no attention to his critics. But then came the lawsuit filed by Sexual Minorities Uganda. “I was shocked,” he told me. “Crimes against humanity? Are they crazy?”

Outraged by the move, and by how he’s been treated in the press, he said he’s now decided to fight back. “The lawsuit was the final straw that called me out,” he told me. “I was ignoring everything, but when they did this, it shows they’ll do whatever it takes to shut me up. So they’ve called me out, and it’s high noon. So I’m back out on the street to have a showdown. Twenty-thirteen is the beginning of renewed activism on my part, and I’m going to start organizing people in this state.”

Not only that, he’s exploring a run for governor.


  • Richard Willmer

    I have myself conversed with Lively, and feel that he is a man with a very rigid mind and a narrow obsession. Perhaps his own rather ‘interesting’ personal history has contributed to his mindset. The Ugandan debacle has probably shaken him more than he would admit; perhaps it would do him good to admit this (at least to himself), and find a more realistic perspective on the complex matter of human sexuality.

  • Dana Pille

    This man was molested as a child. It’s really too bad he didn’t seek out the psychiatric help he so desperately needed. His life could have been so much more rewarding, for himself and those around him.

    • Richard Willmer

      It wouldn’t surprise me; it might well account for his particular perspective on human sexuality. (Of course, child sexual abuse is not about ‘sexuality’; rather it is about the abuse of power.)

  • john martin lutz

    Good job Scott!!!!!!!!!
    Keep going with the T R U T H!!!!!!!

    • Richard Willmer

      But the huge problem is that Lively seems to tell lies in order to discredit gay people. However ‘godly’ an aim might be, it can never be achieved by the Devil’s means (see Luke 4 : 5 – 8). (Mind you, I’m not at all sure that Lively’s ‘anti-gay aims’ are ‘godly’ – but that’s another point for possible discussion.)

      • thisoldspouse

        Please detail one lie that Lively has promoted.

        • Chapelo

          Oh there’s plenty, it’s just a matter of picking out which one. Couldn’t be bothered to find that out yourself, eh grandma?

  • taline nahigian


  • Frederick Wright

    he is a pure monster worthy of extermination.

    • Richard Willmer

      No. This is not something we can say, horrible though this man’s behaviour is. For one thing, if we say such things, we are stooping to his level. To respect his right to life and liberty is to teach him that he should respect others’ rights in this regard. We must respond to his behaviour with understanding, compassion, intelligence and integrity (and fruitful, clever and honest tactics!). And for starters: Tactic #1 – ensure that others understand the full implications of his actions.

    • Twisk

      Frederick Wright, you are saying exactly what you accuse Lively of saying against homosexuals (I even believe he less harsh then you, since he left the “monster” bit out). Are you worse than him?

  • indytchn0

    calling this man crusader only underlines the evilness of his beliefs and yours too.

  • Gregory Peterson

    As near as I can tell from the rhetoric, to the conservative Evangelicals, “homosexuality” must be the new “miscegenation.”

  • Soren456

    How do you “oppose” homosexuality? It makes no sense; it’s like opposing rain or blue eyes.

  • thisoldspouse

    Godspeed on your run for Guv, Scott. Donation on its way from TEXAS.

    • Chapelo

      There’s an old quote that applies here.

      “A fool (ie, YOU), and his money are soon parted.”

      You’re a moron.

  • Joseph

    Wow. Basket cases like Lively is the reason I stay away from religion. How can anyone with half a brain even consider his twisted ideas? It makes me lose faith in humanity. Why are these hatemongers even allowed to exist? I, at least once, thought religion was about love and inclusion. But I guess that Jesus guy had it all wrong yeah?

  • T hughes

    Lively is accountable for the deaths of human beings in Uganda and Russia. Regardless of his views he needs to see the damage he has created. We have the ability to reach out and care for each others, regardless of colour, sex, age or sexuality these are biological factors not a choice. But we also have the ability to act in an unloving inhuman way. This is the way of hate, discrimination and inciting hatred. I wonder which side Jesus would of been on?

  • mjmiddleton1953

    Whatever one agrees or disagrees with his message, Scott Lively is one brave man, committed to his beliefs, unshakable in his resolve. He is being bullied and most likely slandered by an extremely powerful and intensely hostile cultural elite who have the power to completely destroy him. While I don’t agree with everything he says, I have to admire him. We need more people who are willing to sacrifice their careers and reputation for the sake of moral principle. For sure we have enough politicians and leaders of the other kind. But what really strikes me here as baffling and sad is that while there is all this hubbub over Uganda (and one individual’s supposed influence on an entire nation on this issue), when it comes to other nations, like Saudi Arabia, where US Presidents have held hands with (and even bowed down to) its king who rules over a nation where public executions of homosexuals are commonplace, there is not a peep of condemnation from these very same groups who are calling for Lively’s blood. For those who really DO want to protect the lives of gay people, why not oppose those who are actually killing them intentionally?!