Scott Lively: The Crusader

Lively made headlines after an incendiary visit to Uganda when he urged leaders to fight the ‘gay agenda.’ Soon after, a member of the country’s Parliament called for the execution of some homosexuals. Activists are now suing Lively for persecution. What’s next for the Springfield pastor? Exploring a run for governor, of course.

Scott Lively at Holy Grounds

Lively at Holy Grounds with his Bible.

One recent Sunday afternoon, I paid a visit to Lively at Holy Grounds, where each week he delivers a sermon to a small group of followers. I found him there carrying in a box of baked goods and a Crock-Pot of soup to feed his flock after he spoke.

As people trickled in for the sermon, a woman approached Lively to complain that there was no room at a nearby homeless shelter. Used to ministering from a distance on the radio, TV, and at large speaking events, he appeared uncomfortable in this kind of one-on-one encounter, and managed to offer her only awkward platitudes of comfort. “Most people show up later,” he joked to me, “when we get closer to eating time.”

Fifteen minutes after that, Lively mounted a small stage set up in the shop and began delivering his sermon to an audience of about 20 people. He seemed more comfortable. He exuded calm, spoke naturally, and kept his message simple. Always looking for ways to show that the Bible should be interpreted literally, he stood next to a map and cited the recent bombings in Gaza as proof that the Bible had correctly prophesied war in the Middle East. In this sermon, at least, he made no mention of homosexuality.

People kept filtering in as he talked, and by the time he finished, more than 30 were in the audience. I asked one of them, Paul Carvalho, a 48-year-old ex-Marine, what drew him to Lively. “He makes me feel good,” he said. “He is very honest and just tells you to follow the Bible. He doesn’t say you have to be [anti-gay] or you can’t come here. He knows I’m on the fence, but he doesn’t hate gay people, and prays for them, and does everything he can to help people.”

Lively’s work for the poor and homeless in Springfield doesn’t mean that he has abandoned his anti-homosexuality crusade. He has testified against LGBT rights in front of the Massachusetts legislature. He has denounced the state, famously the first in the country to legalize gay marriage, as “the most morally corrupt state in the Union.” He has given talks with such titles as “The Truth about Homosexuality” and “The Global Threat of Homosexuality.” He says that just last year he made some 30 radio appearances and delivered 10 speeches around the country, including one in April, at a Tea Party rally on the Boston Common, where LGBT activists rushed the bandstand area in protest. And he continues to churn out essays and op-ed articles online.

Not surprisingly, a number of Springfield residents worry about having Lively in their midst. The Stop the Hate and Homophobia Coalition, a local social-justice organization, has picketed in front of Holy Grounds on several occasions and helped organize the mass turnout at the federal court hearing in January. “What worries me the most,” says Holly Richardson, the group’s director, “is that other people who he’s influenced will act out and hurt someone. We do not want to drive him out of town, because then he’s someone else’s problem, but our goal is to educate people and try to keep his wings clipped.”

That’s also the goal of the Ugandans who have filed suit against Lively. Whether they will succeed in their efforts is unclear. At the January 7 court hearing, Lively’s lawyers argued that the suit is an attack on Lively’s right to free speech, and as such should be dismissed. At times, the judge appeared to side with Lively, saying that he struggled to see a concrete connection between Lively’s anti-gay advocacy in Uganda and specific acts of persecution committed there against gays. He also noted, however, that the legal standard for dismissing a case is high, and gave no timetable for when he will rule on Lively’s request to toss out the lawsuit.

Lively, for his part, has recently turned over daily operations of Holy Grounds to a local pastor, so that he can focus on his activism. He says he’s negotiating with government officials in several countries, though he would not say which ones, about making speaking tours, and in his newsletter he has begun asking for donations to help his efforts in Massachusetts. He’s 95 percent certain that he’ll run for governor. All of the negative media exposure he’s received since his Uganda trip, he feels, will only help him if he does. “To be blamed for a campaign of hate and violence, when that’s the opposite of what I believe, was really tough,” he says. “And after 20 years of being in this issue, I came out of it with more resolve and more courage. I’ve got skin like a rhinoceros. So now it’s like, ‘Bring it on.’”

As part of the buildup to his run, Lively plans to launch protests at abortion clinics, to speak out against the funding of the “gay agenda” in public schools, to rally Massachusetts conservatives to his cause, and to bring “biblical values” back to the state. “I get to stand for the truth of God,” he says, “at a time when very few people are willing to do it.”

This past November 23, a utility worker in Springfield accidentally punctured a gas line underneath a strip club, injuring more than 20 people. No one was killed, but the blast blew out nearly every window within a three-block radius and damaged 42 buildings. On his blog the next day, Lively wrote that for the past two years he had been praying for the destruction of Satan’s works in Springfield, including strip clubs. And now it had come to pass. “I believe this was the hand of God at work,” he wrote, “in answer to our prayers.”

Holy Grounds Coffee House

Holy Grounds, the coffee shop that Lively founded and runs in downtown Springfield, where he moved in 2008 to “re-Christianize” the city.

Scott Lively buttons

Some of the buttons that Lively hands out to the poor and homeless in Springfield.

Scott Lively holding bible

  • Richard Willmer

    I have myself conversed with Lively, and feel that he is a man with a very rigid mind and a narrow obsession. Perhaps his own rather ‘interesting’ personal history has contributed to his mindset. The Ugandan debacle has probably shaken him more than he would admit; perhaps it would do him good to admit this (at least to himself), and find a more realistic perspective on the complex matter of human sexuality.

  • Dana Pille

    This man was molested as a child. It’s really too bad he didn’t seek out the psychiatric help he so desperately needed. His life could have been so much more rewarding, for himself and those around him.

    • Richard Willmer

      It wouldn’t surprise me; it might well account for his particular perspective on human sexuality. (Of course, child sexual abuse is not about ‘sexuality’; rather it is about the abuse of power.)

  • john martin lutz

    Good job Scott!!!!!!!!!
    Keep going with the T R U T H!!!!!!!

    • Richard Willmer

      But the huge problem is that Lively seems to tell lies in order to discredit gay people. However ‘godly’ an aim might be, it can never be achieved by the Devil’s means (see Luke 4 : 5 – 8). (Mind you, I’m not at all sure that Lively’s ‘anti-gay aims’ are ‘godly’ – but that’s another point for possible discussion.)

      • thisoldspouse

        Please detail one lie that Lively has promoted.

        • Chapelo

          Oh there’s plenty, it’s just a matter of picking out which one. Couldn’t be bothered to find that out yourself, eh grandma?

  • taline nahigian


  • Frederick Wright

    he is a pure monster worthy of extermination.

    • Richard Willmer

      No. This is not something we can say, horrible though this man’s behaviour is. For one thing, if we say such things, we are stooping to his level. To respect his right to life and liberty is to teach him that he should respect others’ rights in this regard. We must respond to his behaviour with understanding, compassion, intelligence and integrity (and fruitful, clever and honest tactics!). And for starters: Tactic #1 – ensure that others understand the full implications of his actions.

    • Twisk

      Frederick Wright, you are saying exactly what you accuse Lively of saying against homosexuals (I even believe he less harsh then you, since he left the “monster” bit out). Are you worse than him?

  • indytchn0

    calling this man crusader only underlines the evilness of his beliefs and yours too.

  • Gregory Peterson

    As near as I can tell from the rhetoric, to the conservative Evangelicals, “homosexuality” must be the new “miscegenation.”

  • Soren456

    How do you “oppose” homosexuality? It makes no sense; it’s like opposing rain or blue eyes.

  • thisoldspouse

    Godspeed on your run for Guv, Scott. Donation on its way from TEXAS.

    • Chapelo

      There’s an old quote that applies here.

      “A fool (ie, YOU), and his money are soon parted.”

      You’re a moron.

  • Joseph

    Wow. Basket cases like Lively is the reason I stay away from religion. How can anyone with half a brain even consider his twisted ideas? It makes me lose faith in humanity. Why are these hatemongers even allowed to exist? I, at least once, thought religion was about love and inclusion. But I guess that Jesus guy had it all wrong yeah?

  • T hughes

    Lively is accountable for the deaths of human beings in Uganda and Russia. Regardless of his views he needs to see the damage he has created. We have the ability to reach out and care for each others, regardless of colour, sex, age or sexuality these are biological factors not a choice. But we also have the ability to act in an unloving inhuman way. This is the way of hate, discrimination and inciting hatred. I wonder which side Jesus would of been on?

  • mjmiddleton1953

    Whatever one agrees or disagrees with his message, Scott Lively is one brave man, committed to his beliefs, unshakable in his resolve. He is being bullied and most likely slandered by an extremely powerful and intensely hostile cultural elite who have the power to completely destroy him. While I don’t agree with everything he says, I have to admire him. We need more people who are willing to sacrifice their careers and reputation for the sake of moral principle. For sure we have enough politicians and leaders of the other kind. But what really strikes me here as baffling and sad is that while there is all this hubbub over Uganda (and one individual’s supposed influence on an entire nation on this issue), when it comes to other nations, like Saudi Arabia, where US Presidents have held hands with (and even bowed down to) its king who rules over a nation where public executions of homosexuals are commonplace, there is not a peep of condemnation from these very same groups who are calling for Lively’s blood. For those who really DO want to protect the lives of gay people, why not oppose those who are actually killing them intentionally?!