The Seal Problem

The population of gray seals on the Cape has exploded in recent years. Is it time to cull the herd?

We set out from Nantucket, about 10 miles east of Muskeget, and on our approach found ourselves heading toward an enormous gathering of gray seals, perhaps as many as 4,000, on a strip of land adjacent to the island. It was an astonishing sight: a tightly packed assemblage of hulking animals that brought to my mind a squadron of infantry grunts, bellies to the ground, massing for an invasion. “Jesus, the smell,” Snow exclaimed as we got downwind of the seals and the heaps of dung they had deposited on the strip. Low, moaning sounds came from the animals, and dozens soon surrounded our boat, curious. Underwater, in the shallows, one sped by like a torpedo. Others humped their way off the shore and into the water.

This herd, and others like it in Cape waters, are the legacy of the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972, which, among other things, made the systematic killing of seals a federal crime. Before the act was passed, seal hunters in the area had for decades been methodically wiping out the local population in order to preserve area fishing stocks. From 1888 to 1908, and again from 1919 to 1962, Massachusetts paid a bounty of between one and five dollars for each seal nose that hunters turned in. This is why Bill Amaru saw no seals when he began fishing in the area decades ago. He says one of his cousins brought noses (and sometimes a flipper, which was also accepted as proof) to the town hall in Orleans for payment. An estimated total of 15,690 bounties were paid during those years.

Now, of course, the seals are back—and to see so many of them gathered in one spot, as I did on my trip to Muskeget, is to confront the question of whether something needs to be done about their growing numbers. Impatient for action, a group that calls itself the Seal Abatement Coalition, made up primarily of sport fishermen from Nantucket, is pushing for “relief” from the Marine Mammal Protection Act. Peter Howell, one of the group’s founders, told me that at a minimum relief should mean the legal right to shoo seals off beaches frequented by people. (Federal guidelines bar the public from getting within 150 feet of seals.) But some of the coalition’s members support a more-radical measure: a revision to the act that would allow the culling—that is, the killing—of seals.

The idea makes many people uneasy. Even Crocker Snow, who’s an avid hunter, wavered that day at Muskeget when I asked if he would kill seals if the act became legal. But my fisherman neighbor Bill Amaru has no problem with the thought. Indeed, seal hunting already takes place in Scandinavia, during seasonal shoots that are approved and regulated by the government, with quotas put in place to limit the total number of deaths. This sounds a lot like the officially sanctioned hunts in many parts of North America that are designed to cull overabundant populations of another cute mammal whose numbers have exploded problematically in recent years: deer.

As a country, though, we’re a long way off from allowing the killing of seals. The Seal Abatement Coalition is aware of how sensitive this subject is. “We’ll have the animal-welfare community down on our necks,” Pete Howell told me. To be fair, there are a number of arguments to be made against the killing of seals. Sharon Young, who lives on the Cape and is the marine-issues field director for the Humane Society, acknowledges that the rising number of gray seals is “probably contributing to a slower rate of recovery” of codfish stocks, but argues that the human mismanagement of those stocks is a much more important factor—and not something seals should suffer for. She also notes that killing seals in Cape waters won’t solve the problem, because many of the animals (with the exception of those at Muskeget) are actually arriving from Canada, and will continue to do so. Because seals are so beloved in this country, she says, it’s appropriate for us as a society to give them special legal protections that we might not give other animals.

All of this means that the seal population on the Cape will keep growing, at least in the short term. This is good news for seal watchers, tour-boat operators, and hungry sharks, and bad news for local fishermen and open-ocean swimmers. We’ve successfully brought the Cape’s seal population back from the brink, which is an achievement to be applauded. But now it’s time to launch a thoughtful debate about whether we’ve overcompensated.

As for me, I still watch the seals at Nauset and plenty of other spots where they are easily seen. But I watch them with a cooler and more-appraising eye. They seem less cute to me now, and more like a hazard. So, with public input, let’s have the authorities make a careful assessment of whether the population is truly overabundant—and, if indeed it is, as so many of us on the Cape believe, let’s begin culling the herd.

 

Paul Starobin is the author of After America: Narratives for the Next Global Age.

ADVERTISMENT

  • Archie Bunker

    no one is going to like to hear it. but a seal cull is what is needed. we do it up in canada because it has to be done, not for fun. the only thing i cannot support is if the animal is only being skinned for its pelt. would like to see oil and food come from the animal as well.

    • borehead

      I agree. Food for the hungry.
      This has been over looked, while the discussion has been about vanity from the people that oppose utilizing this growing natural resourse

      • Person

        you can’t even spell “resource” correctly. We need seals to keep the ecosystem in balance. You clearly do not know the importance of seals. They were here before humans ever stepped foot in North America, so we are the ones taking their food. The human race needs to stop being selfish. We share this planet with billions of other species. These seals are just trying to eat and survive.

        • borehead

          Well damn me all to Hell for a misspelled word! Clearly, you don’t know a damn thing about the eco system or predator prey relationships. Humans are the superior beings, and we share the same food source. They have bred rampantly for forty years under MMPA. Time to lock and load and blast the shit out of ‘em.

          • Person

            Actually, I am a scientist who specializes in the environment, ecology, and physics, and I have worked with several researchers who are trying to bring knowledge to the public about these seals. I just spent three months in nantucket seeing dead seals washed up everywhere. And yes, they have increased in numbers, which may not be great, but that does not mean we just go and kill them. Human interaction almost always makes things worse. Don’t believe it, whatever. But people these days are too narrow minded and wish to kill anything that disturbs their “peace”. Humans are not superior beings, we are just good at taking things that do not belong to us.

          • borehead

            You’ve made two discuss comments, both directed at me. If you were what you claimed to be, you’d bring facts, instead of emotional hyperbole. Fact is about ecologists. They don’t understand the real world. Only believing in how the world should be, if in fact, it could be that way. You want a perfect world? Build an aquarium. Want to grow say, fancy guppies, but have a soft spot for Angel fish? Chances are, the Angel fish will eat your fancy guppies. Oh My! A dilemma! What to do?! If you want the guppies you’ll off the Angels. You, being the superior being can fix the situation as you see fit. Now. Cod and seals,,,,

          • susie kathryn

            Children’s Pool La Jolla CA. Built for disabled people and children, now overrun with seals and fecal contamination blocking access to the only ocean pool we have for the disabled.

          • Jeff Kolovrat

            Do you mean you are a marine biologist with a minor in physics? Taking seals can be managed…much like taking whitetail deer. We, too, are a part of the food chain. The outright prohibition of any animal that has had its predators eliminated, or reduced in number, will lead to over-population and eventually starvation.

          • Herbii

            Humans have bread rampantly for 100 years… we are the cause of seals increasing in population.. most likely bc everywhere else WE depleted all the fish so they move to other areas where conservation efforts work… yes we need a balance but everytime we initiate a balance we get carried away before understanding what is happening.. if we did this it may be an unnecessary slaughter… its amazing to hear “seals decimate fish populations” but the 8 billion people on the planet who take in som 1000000metric tons of fosh from the oceans EVERYDAY is doing nothing?!!! The problem is NOT over population in seals…its over population of humans!!!

          • borehead

            Don’t breed.
            And. You don’t know what you’re talking about when talking seals.

          • Herbii

            Hi borehead, no I dont know a whole lot…. do you?? As a fisherman myself I see everyday how we have disrupted thousands of species just from over fishing.. seasls are NOT the problem.. we are! And we are using them as an excuse for our mistakes and greed! An example of how we never learn nor listen to scientists…. Just like Cod.. so many said oh the cod are doing fine, plent remain and Canadian govts tried banning cod fishing temporarily…. then people like you complained saying the scientists who study these things have NO clue what they are talking about…that there are plenty of fish… so they lifted the bans out of feeling bad for them losing their jobs….then in 1992 an entire ecosystem collapsed and the cod nearly disappeared in Newfoundland! So what went from a temporary job loss was not only an extinction of an ecosystem, it was an extinction of an industry – PERMANENTLY! then people tried blaming the Govt for all those who lost their jobs… When in fact it was the fishermen themselves who ruined a 500 year tradition of Cod fishing bc they couldnt control themselves and overfished.. now the same thing is happening in New England.. Cod have been decimated, people are sayimg the sciemce is wrong.. so in order to protect an industry and specie, we need a temporary ban… bc New England has perhaps the best conservation efforts in the world there is a fishing industry…albeit still declining.. but as a fishermen myself I see numbers dropping eith my own eyes, I also know its a fact Seals are following the food bc THERE MUST BE LIMITRD FOOD SUPPLIES ELSEWHERE! SO they are coming to Cape Cod where stripers and blues are plentiful… so again, we are to blame.. Seals are not.. they are doing the logical thing following the food… if we atart hunting them, they may have NO where else togo.. thats how bad the situation is with fish stocks declining! Conservation works… there will come a time in the next decade or two we will see a 100% ban on all localized, coastal fishing… bc a finite supply of dwindling fisheries, can not sustain infinite growth of the human population!!!

          • borehead

            Here’s the seal deal.
            There were no seals on Cape Cod forty years ago. There was a bounty on them.
            Forty years ago, there were plenty of cod there.
            There are now an estimated 16,000 seals that eat something, and they enjoyed easy picking of cod that was in nets waiting to be hauled.
            They would eat the bellies where the liver is and ruin the catch, causing massive discards.
            There cannot be a fishery management plan to increase cod if someone else is fishing them.
            The unregulated fishing community thrives today, thanks to MMPA.
            Not sure how much you read about this stuff, but I look at a couple hundred articles per day for our website.
            There are other opinions about seal/cod interaction.
            One guy on the Cape that is in the tourism business there, argues the seal don’t eat cod, but eat sand lance.
            NOAA NEFSC came out with an opinion about sand lance and a switch in cod diet preference changing around 2007.
            Where they come up with this, I can’t say.
            However, if that’s true, and they used the point to post a disclaimer that the fishermen were right saying they were seeing plenty of cod,
            and the scientists were correct when it came to saying there was a cod crisis, because the cod had aggregated into one small area, and not spread out.
            Now if that’s true, it says one thing. That is that cod and seals are competing for the same food. Sand Lance!
            Onward to Canada!
            The real reason for the cod collapse in Canada was also one of feed.
            Caiplin.
            They crashed around that time, and there’s no doubt, heavy pressure from fishing.
            People believe that there are no cod in Canada.
            Nothing could be further from the truth as today, listening to the Fisheries Broadcast, they are developing a new fishery management plan.
            They are having a cod renaissance. And, the Caiplin are back. In huge numbers!
            What’s interesting to note is, while New England’s cod numbers have supposedly dropped, theirs have dramatically increased during the same time period.
            The scientist won’t tell you that because they have not figured it out.
            Their computer models would never tell them what the fishermen could!
            How, you may ask, do I know about the fish in Canada, that gave me the anecdotal evidence to make these claims?
            Old Tony Doyle told us, he’s never seen the amount of fish he’s seeing today in over fifty years!
            I can even provide a link so you could here it for yourself.
            Find me here http://fisherynation.com/

        • Jeff Kolovrat

          We are part of that ecosystem…though some may believe we are an non-native species from somewhere else in the galaxy! I have no problem with seal hunting…provided it is done on a one-on-one basis…that is, without large-scale netting, etc. In addition, the entire animal should be used…hide, blubber, and meat!

  • 7worldtraveler

    Naw…the great whites will take care of the cull.

  • Shoe

    Being that nothing bad has ever happened from human intervention, such as the eradication or endangerment of other species, I say go for it. Cull those damn pesky seals and let the sharks starve. Great Idea Sir!

  • susie kathryn

    The Children’s Pool in La Jolla CA was built by Ellen Brownin Scripps. An Ocean Pool with a breakwater to serve Children and the Disabled. In 1992 Sea World began to drop off rehabbed seals by the dozens for years on end. No EIR was done first to ascertain if our local ecoystem could sustain so many new marine mammals never there in such numbers or the subsequent birth exlosion. Now our fish stocks are serverly depleted even the CA State Marin Fish the Garibaldi. The mussel population is depleted as are the Tide Pool Creatures that feed on them. The fecal contamination is terrible and a potential health hazard in our urban area. Please go to change.org enter ADA Access and please sign the ADA Children’s Pool petition to try and save the only ocean pool on the Contental United States and the only safe entry and exiit for wheelchair swimmers. The money made from the view of seals has trumped the needs of the disabled to the only safe access on the West Coast for a wheelchair swimmer. So we have two important issues at our only ocean pool, Disabilty access restored and the over population of seals polluting and decimating fish stocks and species. If one loves seals one must love their home and the balance of the Ocean. Thank you.
    Restorechildrenspool@gmail.com RAMP Commitee to Restore Access To Many People.