The Real Face of Terror: Behind the Scenes Photos of the Dzhokhar Tsarnaev Manhunt

In response to the controversial Rolling Stone cover, new photos of Tsarnaev’s capture emerge.

TK

A sniper trains his bead on Tsarnaev. (All photos by Sean Murphy)

The Rolling Stone cover featuring the suspected Boston Marathon bomber, Dzhokhar Tsarnaev has, of course, set off a firestorm of controversy across the country. Critics believe that the cover glamorizes Tsarnaev, depicting him as a kind of rock ‘n roll outlaw rather than a terrorist who has been charged with killing four people and seriously wounding hundreds of others.

Sgt. Sean Murphy, a tactical photographer with the Massachusetts State Police who has photographed the funerals of many officers killed in the line of duty, is furious with the magazine. Murphy, who also acts a liaison to the families of fallen officers, is so angered by the cover—which he says is both dangerous and insulting to the victims of the bombings—that he feels the need to counter the message that it conveys.

We all remember the day of the manhunt, when Governor Patrick and law enforcement officials decided, in essence, to shut Boston down. Throughout it all, Murphy, alone in his assignment behind police lines, was capturing images of the day’s events—the high-level conferences, the mobilization of law enforcement, and the dramatic capture. Because the whole thing was televised live, everyone knows that the day ended with a wounded Tsarnaev being taken into custody. What few people have seen, because Murphy’s photos from that day have never been made public before, is the condition Tsarnaev was in at the time of his capture—and, indeed, exactly how he was captured. Murphy wants the world to know that the Tsarnaev in the photos he took that night—defeated and barely alive, with the red dots of sniper rifles lighting up his forehead—is the real face of terrorism, not the handsome, confident young man shown on the magazine cover. Following are a number of his photos from that day. A more complete collection will appear in our September issue.

Here, in his own words, Murphy shares his thoughts on the Rolling Stone cover. He stresses that he is speaking strictly for himself and not as a representative of the Massachusetts State Police:

“As a professional law-enforcement officer of 25 years, I believe that the image that was portrayed by Rolling Stone magazine was an insult to any person who has every worn a uniform of any color or any police organization or military branch, and the family members who have ever lost a loved one serving in the line of duty. The truth is that glamorizing the face of terror is not just insulting to the family members of those killed in the line of duty, it also could be an incentive to those who may be unstable to do something to get their face on the cover of Rolling Stone magazine.

“I hope that the people who see these images will know that this was real. It was as real as it gets. This may have played out as a television show, but this was not a television show. Officer Dick Donohue almost gave his life. Officer Sean Collier did give his life. These were real people, with real lives, with real families. And to have this cover dropped into Boston was hurtful to their memories and their families. I know from first-hand conversations that this Rolling Stone cover has kept many of them up—again. It’s irritated the wounds that will never heal—again. There is nothing glamorous in bringing more pain to a grieving family.

“Photography is very simple, it’s very basic. It brings us back to the cave. An image like this on the cover of Rolling Stone, we see it instantly as being wrong. What Rolling Stone did was wrong. This guy is evil. This is the real Boston bomber. Not someone fluffed and buffed for the cover of Rolling Stone magazine.”

TK

Tsarnaev’s image distributed to troopers at roll call.

TK

Federal, state, and local officials strategize in mobile state police command post.

Mayor Menino is briefed by State Police Col. Timothy Alben, Governor Patrick, FBI Special Agent Richard DeLauriers, and BPD Superintendent Ed Davis.

TK

The state police tactical response vehicle arrives in Watertown.

TK

Law enforcement officials converge on the boat where Tsarnaev is hiding.

TK

State troopers plan final assault on the boat.

TK

State troopers at the scene in Watertown.

TK

Law enforcement at the scene in Watertown.

TK

A sniper’s view of the boat.

TK

Tsarnaev emerges from the boat.

TK

Tsarnaev on the boat.

TK

Tactical EMTs attend to Tsarnaev.

TK

Medical personnel prepare to put Tsarnaev into an ambulance.

  • http://boatloadofcrap.blogspot.com/ Yg_Bluig

    Isn’t the photo the trooper at the roll call is holding the same one of the fluffed and buffed Tsarnaev that was used on the Rolling Stone cover?

    • Mark_Peterson

      No, it’s not.

  • thomas Jr.

    Mad props to the great JOURNALIST who took these photos. Freedom of expression at it’s finest

    • emerald98

      hear hear. and they should show what he really looks like today, not a rock star in the least. these girls should use their heads and know that he had bombs in his car, so strange that the Boston Bomber and he this guy had the same explosives. these girls are so stuck on the video of him not putting down the bag that they do not connect the shoot out with the bombing ….this should prove something to them. but again, some people just think he is so nice and cute that he couldn’t kill others.

      • Anjali

        According to people inside the court room, he looks pretty much the same. I heard a CNN correspondent say he was taller in person and looked younger than 19…but the same. A picture of him now probably wouldn’t help.

        • emerald98

          According to my own eyes, he does not look like this anymore. I was sitting right behind his sisters, and do I need to say what I saw. he kept looking to his sisters so I got to see face over several times, and him walking in, etc…and he used an accent that he never had before. He has nerve damage to the left side of his face, and wired jaw, which he cannot smile without moving to the right side, he drools, and his left eye is sorta like Stallone, can’t hear out of left ear….I thought he looked like he was on some kind of meds. His face did not look symmetrical, uneven so to speak. And it’s been three months so you would think he would be better by now. Even one of his wrestling friends said he was not he same person, the way he moved and looked. Quote. So I meant that this cover was his old self, a lot has happened to him physically and mentally over these months. Being taller is not even an issue. This my opinion of course, and many others. But to go even deeper into his body language as one of his friends said, was strange, that accent was either nerves or something much deeper, like an Anti-American stance, or throwing off his old self to something different, his life is changed. But that accent was choice he made, most people that heard it could not believe it, because he never had one before.

          • Hellsbells

            ?? accent? What are you talking about? Do you mean he was speaking in a language you are unfamiliar with? Re: you’d think he’d be better by now- I had ankle surgery in January and I am still not totally recovered, much less having been shot. He’s a criminal who was able to commit a heinous crime. He’s also a very vulnerable young man, and he was before the shooting. We can’t undo what he did- we can focus on helping vulnerable people on the fringes of our societies.

          • Ummah Gummah

            .

            Oh the vuuulneeeraaable terrorist.. CRY ME A RIVER.

            .

          • Troy To You

            Sounds like he meant ‘accent’… Why do you question? It’s written as if the person has actually been in the room with him. have you been in the room with him? The vulnerable young man killed 4 people, including a child. What happens to him, he brought on himself…

          • emerald98

            I am saying cute cover boy is no longer, his life is changed forever. It’s not mean or without compassion, it is a fact and reality. Well he did have gut shot wounds and arms, yet he was walking fine, so what is problem about the fact that his face is messed up, even plastic surgery heels in 6 weeks! He was speaking English with a Russian/Chechen accent, something none of his friends ever heard, people that knew him for years. I am sure there are few reasons for this, probably the biggest is that he was not going to speak, his lawyer tried to enter his pleas for all counts in one not-guilty, but the judge insisted he speak and answer the charges himself. Nerves, for show or psychological. Your right he was a young man, not a kid, but young guy who made a terrible, terrible decision, regardless if he thought he was helping other Muslims or not. And shooting innocent people, who are a small part of any vote that would influence our government over their (him and his brothers) grievances. And Martin was 8, well he couldn’t vote at all. So why kill him (you know the argument of Democracy and ALL the people in the U..S vote for drones, etc., and that is why they kill innocent random people. Terrorism, The US does awful things, and somehow killing innocent people helps change all this. because every single American votes for it, that is belief…why not go to the president with these attacks, he is the one that do could something and fast?)In fact, there are young guys and women that have worse problems than he had – yet none of them kill or plant bombs. By all accounts his friends and family said he showed no sighs of needing help. He was acting like Jahar. How was anyone to help him when clearly he looked like a normal guy that seemed happy. How are the American people suppose to help people we don’t even know have a problem? We can find justifications for a whole host of issues in this world, but most don’t do something so extreme for fear of losing our lives and freedom. This article did little to answer his real motives, it’s only speculation that his life sucked so he turned to Islam, the most extreme interpretation of it to end his own life and others. Do I feel badly that his parents divorced, he had pay his own way to school, (me too) and didn’t have a lot of money – yes, but that is not new to other young people in this world. He is not the only one with crappy circumstances. Yet you don’t see them planting bombs out of frustration over their lives,in fact if that was the reason. It’s too bad, he was young and many of his issues would have passed, but when you add a religious ideology to people, there is not much people one can do to help them (just read his twitter account) when they read such stuff on the internet and have dominate strong brother as his, that he looked up to, someone that appeared to know more about Islam and helped guide him in his decision. But that is not defense. But was he really a devout Muslim, all the smoking (selling weed), drinking and partying. nor did he pray 5 times a day, doesn’t look like he was following Muslim values too much, yet none of his own behaviors mattered, only that killing could be justified, and if you believe what he wrote, he thought it could. It’s pretty clear that that both believed they would be martyrs, and they would die in this event, I mean when you shoot a cop and shoot at more and throw bombs, there is that idea that you are going to be killed. So when you imply I have no compassion for young people, you are severely and utterly wrong. I feel for him to a point that I don’t wish the death penalty for him, but letting him go is not an option either. It just seems a waste of good life, a precious life – the victims and his. Instead of spending so much time going on how great he was, this article left out critical issues on how complex and hidden people are, and these friends that adored him so much, could have been standing at the finish line or running, and that would have mattered little – evil and goodness live in all people, but most people don’t act on the evil in ways of Terrorism and Murder. No one could have helped him when they saw no signs, except the mother, she saw signs but accepted Jihad. Call her and complain, she is after all the mother, and she will say the same thing, he was an angel, he no problems. This article wrote a fluffy little piece that matched the cover to sell to younger readers. Don’t you wonder why James Holmes is not on the cover, he is young and committed murder too, but the girls don’t like him so much. Not cute enough, perhaps. So quit making us feel like we failed him and that is why he committed Terrorism. Plus, tons of other immigrants find it offensive as they work so hard for a life in this country and he just throws it away.

    • ClarkKent

      I think a better journalist wouldn’t have waited four months to add these obviously important pictures to the public record.

    • PeopleDontCareAsMuchAsTheySay

      He’s not a journalist. He’s an idiot cop who doesn’t understand journalism. What the Boston police force did to capture this kid was amazing. However, for every kind–hearted,, hard-working policeman, there are 100 punks like this guy who PRAY for something like this to happen so they don’t have to be adult baby-sitters.

      • PreachJohn

        ‘ídiot cop’—It’s you who doesn’t understand journalism.
        He’s been doing this for 45 yrs. Allow him some credit as the gifted communicator he obviously is. Or are you even able to do that?
        Because he sure countered Rolling Stone’s sophistic stupidity for me, and countless others. Bulls eye!

  • MRB
  • emerald98

    wow, did he ever counter this image.

  • scarybearsalesman

    that cop is an asshole. its a photo of the suspect. it doesnt glamorize terrorism. get a grip, drama queen.

    • arne

      it does glamorize

      • Sallynotadude

        How, his photo is everywhere anyway. If it was going to happen then it already has. Also, it is just useless to try and prevent stupid people from being stupid. Those morons that defend this kid at his trial (The ones outside with signs) will always exist for anything.

      • nightmoth

        Jeez–it’s the same photo we’ve seen a dozen times in all the newspapers.

    • Mollyheart

      you, sales ass wipe are the drama queen!

    • Damien Alvarado

      you are a piece of sh*t.

    • Briannabelle19

      It is giving that little pile of shit everything he and his brother wanted. To be known.

      • FunkTron

        Too damn late for that. They are already known. Now it’s time to discuss the matter rationally and try to get to the bottom of “why”. These guys already grabbed the attention of the world, putting his picture on a magazine for a serious news article isn’t going to further their goals any more than you peeing in the ocean will raise the tides.

  • Juan

    That cover on Rolling Stone isn’t meant to glamorize the guy. It’s meant to show that the suspect didn’t fit the expectations that people had of the potential bomber.

    Trying to paint the world as if every person responsible for something heinous has to look a certain way is ridiculous.

    • sanfordandsons

      The suspect didn’t fit the xpectations of a potential bomber? What are those expectations there Juan? Do you have an exact MO of a bomber? It does glamorize the dirtbag no matter what you say. Placing his picture on any magazine at this point of the investigation is trying to form opinions in peoples minds. It has apparently worked for you.

      • Sallynotadude

        He doesn’t have to, he is speaking about the public at large, they are the ones who think a bomber looks a certain way.

        • Mollyheart

          … and you know that how? The cover was buffed up airbrushed and softened with toner to make him look much more attractive than he is.

          Waiting for your reference that states how the public perceives the look of a bomber… tick, tick, tick…

          • Sallynotadude

            Are you new? The public has a lot of feelings and opinions. Is this like the first time someone has invoked the public for you?

          • Joe Gordon

            “The cover was buffed up airbrushed and softened with toner to make him look much more attractive than he is.”

            An out and out bullshit lie.

            NOTHING WAS DONE TO THE PHOTO you lying filth.

          • Hegetarian

            He looks pretty unkempt.

          • FunkTron

            What an absurd comment. To pretend you know that a group of well-respected journalists would alter the cover photo for the purpose you claim is just outrageous. You provide some proof, and we’ll have something to talk about. Until then, it’s just crazy tinfoil hat crap.

    • carla5731

      He is young, male, an adherent of Islam and born outside the US. He fits the “expectations” to a T.

      • Vince Chihak

        Just like Adam Lanza, James Holmes, Seung-Hui Cho (VT shooter), Columbine dudes, Ted Kaczynski, Timothy McVeigh…etc amirite?

        • Robert177

          Nah, more like the dozen 9-11 hijackers, Bin Laden, KSM, the Ft Hood shooter, and the hundreds of guys Obama has killed with drones.

          • stoneynhvt

            Speaking of magazine covers and Bin Laden, on how many covers did Bin Laden appear?

          • ugh

            Bill Ayers has been on lots of covers.

        • carla5731

          Adam Lanza, James Holmes, Seung-Hui Cho and Columbine dudes were not terrorists. However, all of them fit the first two categories of being young and male.

          What about Nidal Hasan, Faisal Shahzad, Jose Pimentel, Ahmed Ferhani, Quazi Mohammad Rezwanul Ahsan Nafis, Raees Alam Qazi and Sheheryar Alam Qazi, Jesse Morton, Mohamed Alessa and Carlos Almonte, Abdel Hameed Shehadeh.

          I was responding to another comment that said the “suspect didn’t fit the expectations that people had of the potential bomber.” There’s nothing about Tsarnaev that surprised me. If we suddenly see a rash of menopausal women, who are Methodists and born and raised in the Midwest, terrorizing people with bomb plots, then I’ll be surprised.

          • ME-B

            they weren’t terrorists? really? what’s the definition of a terrorist? If you say they weren’t terrorists, then what were they?

          • LoveIsLouder85

            Yes, actually, Lanza, Holmes, Cho, Harris, AND Klebold actually were terrorists. How were they not?

        • ugh

          You forgot Obama’s pal Bill Ayers. You know, the one that bombed the Capitol and killed people? Funny how you lefty libs never bring that up.

          • runnerbp

            Bill Ayers never killed anyone. The bombs could have killed someone but their intent was to destroy government property. This is slightly refuted by the bomb that blew up 3 weather underground members which was intended to be set off at a military dance where people were likely to be killed. He certainly has questionable character, but a politician interacts with many people by suggesting he’s a “pal”. That’s really just stupid.

          • steelers01

            And the liberal pukes in Chicago make him a professor. Liberalism is truly a mental disease that needs to be eradicated like the cancer that it is in America.

      • Anjali

        If that’s the case, then why aren’t there a half a billion terrorists? Or have you been lead to believe there really are that many, oh media!! Good thing we have our quasi-military police state to protect us.

        • Robert177

          Where in the world do you come up with half billion? Look, there are around a billion Muslims in the world. If 1% of them were either terrorists or helped support terrorism(financially, etc), that would mean 10 MILLION Muslims, worldwide, were involved in terror. This “10 Million” is likely close to accurate.

          • kvural

            Where in the world do you come up with 1%? What if it’s 0.001%? It was an ass-pull when Steven Crowder said it, and it’s an ass-pull when you’re saying it.

          • runnerbp

            Rob, there’s about 1.5 Billion Muslims and 2.1 Billion Christians. Actually I’m more worried about nearly half of Americans (Christians too I presume) who believe the Earth is around Ten Thousand years old. That means nearly half of all Americans live in a fantasy world. That’s scary.

          • steelers01

            Funny, here I am worried how I am going to keep paying for the ever increasing liberal entitlements to the worthless. Of course as long as they keep voting straight democrat, the endless freebies will just keep coming.

        • carla5731

          You missed the point entirely. I was responding to a comment that said the “suspect didn’t fit the expectations that people had of the potential bomber.” There’s nothing about Tsarnaev’s profile that surprised me, starting with the fact that he’s young and male. That doesn’t mean every young male will commit a heinous violent act; what it means is that I would’ve been shocked if the Boston bombers were two menopausal Methodists from Dubuque, Iowa.

    • timtedtomtod

      But are you aware that he already has a cult following on the internet of of ‘fans’ swapping cute pics of him? I believe that that we should see these pictures if we want to truly get an understanding of his life, but using this picture on the cover is in extremely poor taste, not only in representation of the acts behind the article, but in respect to the victims.

      • Hegetarian

        Yeah, and Yigal Amir, the extremist Israeli who assassinated Yitzhak Rabin, was getting marriage proposals in jail. You can’t judge a nation by the creepiest among them.

      • FunkTron

        That is unavoidable. The world has people who are going to do ridiculously crazy stuff no matter what Rolling Stone puts on the cover. Those people were sharing pictures before this cover came out, and the people inclined to do so are going to do so no matter how we cover the situation

  • Aaron K Kraus

    If your objection is that the cover photo glamorizes Dzhokhar Tsarnaev and presents him as an enticing role model to young readers because of his looks then you’re rightly concerned about something that has nothing to do with Rolling Stone.

    If your objection is that the cover photo humanizes Dzhokhar Tsarnaev and presents him as a multi-demensional — even sympathetic — figure, well you have just confronted one of humanity’s starkest truths: that we are all humans, endowed with a tremendous capacity for both evil and empathy. Again, your concern has nothing to do with Rolling Stone.

    If your objection is that the cover photo of Dzhokhar Tsarnaev disrespects the victims of his alleged crimes because it focuses on the criminal rather than the crimes then you’re arguing for such a narrow view of journalism and journalistic priorities that the end product would probably do little to educate, enlighten, and engage readers.

    If your objection is that Rolling Stone’s intention is to drive sales with sensational cover photos, well, yeah.

    Then again, see the photos above, linked online, to drive traffic.

    • suzeiki

      Well said. Thank you.

      • Luis S

        Post that picture, but not on Rolling Stones……..

        • Thomos Smith Ward

          THANK YOU. Exactly. Christ, people are thick.

          That cover has almost explicitly been entertainers in the past. Therefore, this is the most blatantly obvious use of this event for profit that I have yet seen. When I see other media outlets being so blatant about using murder for profit, I will be sure to criticize them as well.

    • Sallynotadude

      You are the reason comment voting was invented.

      • Munitor

        You’re all so ingenuous. Tsarnaev could be anyone and anything but never having anything to do with this ‘Boston Attack’. Think on:

        1. He and others chased and killed were and will always be only Suspects due to point 2;

        2. What kind of real convincing evidence has been shown that correlates Tsarnaev with the attack.

        3. What is the catch threatening a bunch of people on an event like this?
        Just doesn’t make sense to a terrorist mind, it would be like throwing
        a rock to the air.

        4. A few days ago a black young admitted have perpetrated the attacks without help of anyone, and police ‘showed him clemence and only charged him with prison’ No shooting, no Killings, no ‘Drama’.

        5. The reason behind all of this was to turn the malleable public attention of a whole country latent to enter into a Collective Hysteria stadium due the constant Media allusion about a ‘North Korea Nuclear Threat’, backed up by point 4.

        6. People believe everything Media just says.

        7. Govts always let people know exactly what they want them to know as to think.

        8. I’m sure Tsarnaev is another martyr of US stupidity or whatever one says it.

        9. How would anyone react under knowledge of idiotic gunmen coming after you with deadly force? That’s why he run and hid.

        10. US Police MOST TIMES are visceral idiots driven by public opinion, they react without thinking and footage shown is just evidence against them and authorities. That’s why photographer was rested: Since Photographs puclicized evidence they attack civilians being only suspects, and they did killed one of them, being only a Suspect, no one yet proven Guilty.

        • TheDeuce

          People like you are the reason we need police. And all your ranting, irrational (What you think is “logic”) premises begin from the assumption that he is innocent, regardless of whether he actually did it or not. Equally as ludicrous a premise from which to begin. I’m so thankful that you are not in any position of leadership or power, and never will be. Live well.

          • Joseph Boyd

            The premise being “innocent until proven guilty in a court of law” comes to mind.

          • Dan Meyer

            Kinda like George Zimmerman, right?

          • JET

            Zimmerman had nothing to do with bombing…But ask Al Sharpton…He thinks that he is guilty of all evil…..

          • Sebastian Schmid

            How is that even comparable? Zimmerman may not have been found guilty. But the main reason for this is a foolish law that basically allows any Florida citizen to gun down a guy who is superior in a fist fight. In other parts of the world or even in other states this would have been a serious crime – maybe not a 2nd degree murder but some kind of felony. If we allow this to happen, basically anybody can start a fight with someone, provoke to be attacked and then use a gun to end it for good.
            That has nothing to do with a terrorist who killed and injured countless innocent people and than decided to run and shoot at policemen who were trying to take him into custody. If he is so innocent, why did he not get a lawyer and turned himself in immediately once his face surfaced on the media like any sane person would have done. Hiding, car jacking shooting at the police: yeah sure. That is what innocent people do *sarcasm off*

          • roberted

            So, if someone is being beaten in a fist fight or say, having their head bashed against a concrete sidewalk after just having their nose broken and they have a gun, they should not use it and just say to themselves, “No, they are just going to hurt me, but they don’t want to kill me ?”

            I don’t think so. The idea that if someone is superior in a fight the other person must just accept the beating as if they know when it’s going to stop is…..nuts.

          • Sebastian Schmid

            Maybe. Or maybe it is nuts to wait until your head gets smashed to the ground (if this did truly happen is at least not a certainty) in the first place. I mean he could have passed out during the process. Why did he not use his gun to give a warning shot (before taking a beating). That is what happens when untrained, non-professionals get their hands on deadly weapons. Experience tells me there are many ways to get out of a threatening situation – shooting someone should only be the very last resort. How can you say this applies to the Zimmerman situation. I just think it is disturbing that ending someones life – especially an unarmed persons – is taken so lightly by many.

          • GunnerC

            Warning shot? How do you tell a warning shot from a real one? Where will that warning shot land? Warning shots are irresponsible. Don’t fire a weapon unless it is pointed at the target you want to kill.

          • sdslezak

            I think that’s his point… Look at the slipery slope that the state of Florida is going down relating to this law. I wonder, do you think that the jurors aquited based on Zimmerman’s injuries? What would have happened if he didn’t have a broken nose, or a small laceration in his head? How could he have proved self defense then?

          • Steven

            Zimmerman’s defense did not use the “Stand Your Ground” statute (yet). It used common self defense which is the same or similar in every other state. On that subject, 21 other states also have a “Stand Your Ground” law.

            I say they haven’t used that law “yet” because one of its provisions is to provide immunity from all civil actions and further requires anyone filing civil actions to pay all the expenses of defending against it. (FSA 766 et seq)

          • Sebastian Schmid

            Thanks for the insight concerning immunity in civil actions. I did not know that

          • JonaD

            BS, that is a crazy idealistic fantasy notion!! The real premise is ‘charged with a crime’, and it is the role of the court to ferret out the truth via an adversarial process. THAT’S WHAT IS…

          • Curtis

            Joseph you are a moron I would kick your ass if I knew where you lived. Actually please tell me and I’m on the first flight.

          • Ralfine

            They wouldn’t let you on a plane after you insulted one of your TSA girls.

          • estragon

            so, you have a problem with “innocent until proven guilty?”

            that is, you have a problem with the rule of law and western justice.

            great.

          • Nick099

            See the attorney’s clarification above. Then grow up.

          • ignatzman

            As a criminal attorney I assure you that you as well as countless others commonly misuse the innocent until proven guilty rule. This is a strictly legal concept applicable only in a court of law in order to legally convict someone of a crime. It is not in any way applicable to what is sometimes called the court of public opinion which is protected by the first amendment. Outside a courtroom one is entitled to believe as I do that Tsarnaev is a terrorist murderer and a piece of human debris without a mindless lecture

          • Joris123

            Still, reserving judgement untill all objective facts are presented can be considered a great rule of thumb for anyone who appreciates caution as a triumph of intellect over emotion. Inside or outside court.

            The public opinion tends to be a powerful force that has the ability to destroy lives that find themselves in its crosshair. And unfortunately there is a great deal of collateral damage as a result. The less caution people practice, the worse this gets.

          • musings2

            I agree that history affords many examples of a rush to judgement. Even given the facts of this case, the idea that he knew exactly what his older brother was up to is debatable.

          • wytworm

            It doesn’t matter if he did or did not, he is owed due process.

          • http://whatistaxed.com/ GOOGLE EXCLUDED INCOME

            Ha, ha, hardy har, The govt is angry because they just got caught fabricating (lying as usual) evidence. This boy didn’t have a bullet damaged throat as the govt claimed. No, they surgically chopped his throat so he, like his brother, can’t explain that they were set up as patsies. Now, too many Americans know Boston Bombing was yet another inside job. Notice Boston Globe has already reported that NSA ADMITTED they already had planned a drill for the same EXACT event, a Boston backpack bomber. Also, notice all the govt agents wearing the same black backpacks at the same time for purpose of confusion. So, like Nero, we all know the govt did this terrorist attack, again, so they can take more god given rights from American citizens.
            FACT: 911, had govt drills of same events.
            FACT: London 777, govt had drills of same events.
            The cop who released the photos is a HERO. He knows govt is trying to take god given right of self defense and bearing guns from we the public.

          • ueber

            Where does God give us the right to bear arms? I’m pretty sure Christ taught us to love each other. Bibles and guns do not and never will mix.

          • ThorsTheTroll

            God tells us that life is precious, and that we should defend our lives and those of others against evil men who would kill or maim us. It’s called self-defense and defense of others. So there.

          • Jane

            “Put your sword back into its place. For all who take the sword will perish by the sword” nowhere does it say keep guns around and start shooting people who you think did you wrong.

          • ThorsTheTroll

            So in your mind, protecting yourself and your loved ones is “living by the sword” and is the same as shooting people who did you wrong? How do you figure that?

          • http://whatistaxed.com/ GOOGLE EXCLUDED INCOME

            1. Everyone and thing is born with the right to destroy whatever is coming to destroy them.
            2. Christ is not God, even Christ said so.
            3. Christ said sell your clothes to buy a sword, which at the time was an illegal weapon for Jews to possess.

            4. Follow Jesus, arm yourself.
            5. No one knows what God wants since he did not write the Bible. Even Moses did not talk to God, but to a burning bush, which really means he was getting high on the mountain.

          • DD4D

            Ah, now your rant above makes sense. Don’t hurt yourself falling off your high horse!

          • runnerbp

            If no one knows what God wants then how do you KNOW you must follow Jesus and arm yourself and destroy whatever you see as wanting to destroy you? What if YOU are WRONG and suffer from delusional paranoia?

          • Sakeeta Rosen

            And how do you know that God even exists?

          • runnerbp

            We don’t. But it might be a comforting idea. Unless She’s mad at you.

          • finabiscotti

            ask Obama that question – as the messiah, he should know……what delusions are – as a member of the CHOOM GANG – showing his brain was eaten up with drugs.
            seems like that is what he was doing on the night of The Radical Muslim terrorist attack in Benghazi = preparing to take flight for a fundraiser in Las Vegas…..

          • Right Wing Mike

            Holy shit, you just became the dumbest person on the web, congratulations!

          • LouAnnWatson

            “Don’t imagine that I came to bring peace to the Earth! I came not to bring peace, but a sword.”

            Matthew 10:34
            Although He does teach us to love one another, he also says to resist any that are not of Him.

          • Ralfine

            Yes, that’s how we know Christians. Bringing the sword to everyone and killing anyone not following their will.

          • ctuton

            Don’t confuse the teachings of Jesus Christ with the foreign policy of the criminal cartel that has occupied the American government and the large group of misguided Americans that march in lockstep with these criminal policies.

          • Ralfine

            The killing of the first born wasn’t American. Asking Abraham to kill his son as a sign of his obedience was at least child abuse.

          • finabiscotti

            yep, while al-Qaeda “leaders” behead their hostages – and eat their organs as Cannibals.

          • Ralfine

            One more reason not to make holiday there. There are enough other hiking places in this world.

          • ctuton

            Very few people read and study the Bible anymore. Christ directed his disciples to sell even their garments if they had to in order to arm themselves with a sword. Look….

            31 And the Lord said, Simon, Simon, behold, Satan hath desired to have you, that he may sift you as wheat:

            [snip: you can read these on your own in context]

            35 And he said unto them, When I sent you without purse, and scrip, and shoes, lacked ye any thing? And they said, Nothing.

            36 Then said he unto them, But now, he that hath a purse, let him take it, and likewise his scrip: and he that hath no sword, let him sell his garment, and buy one.

            Luke 22:31-36 (KJV)

          • runnerbp

            NUMBERS 31:17-18 God commanded Moses to kill all of the
            male Midianite children and “kill every woman who has slept with a man,
            but save for yourselves every girl who has never slept with a man.” And then God said do what with the virgins?

          • ctuton

            Who’s talking in Numbers and who’s talking in Luke? Big difference.

          • runnerbp

            Oh? So you get to choose the parts you like?

          • dismas

            Stick with the New Testament. Christ said “You have heard it said ‘An eye for an eye’ etc. but I say love thine enemy…'” and so on. The Old Testament is history, nearly primitive and sets the stage for new, Christ-like thought.
            Or you can just keep making things up as it suits your purpose.

          • canardnoir

            Obviously, you can prove anything with either numbers, case law, or the Bible (especially when NBC editing protocol is used):

            Exodus 21:24 – “Eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot,…”

          • Michael R.

            ctuton, please clarify “very few people”… I believe you ruin your credibility with your opening line.

          • BoDogit3

            eww and the nasty head of the gun control agenda bears its ugly head to try to make use of this “event”. Do not pretend to invoke Christ as you remove the inalienable rights of man that includes self defense for your control. Belief in the Father set us free from your control.

          • Lonny Bubert

            Guns were not invented at the time of the bible.

            Lu 22:36 And He said to them, “But now, whoever has a money belt is to take it along, likewise also a bag, and whoever has no sword is to sell his coat and buy one.

          • Sakeeta Rosen

            God didn’t plan for our government to go against him, and try to kill us either. Hence why he states in the Bible, to listen and obey our governmental authorities.

            In reality, the Illuminati wrote the bible. But the facts are still there in it.

            It also doesn’t matter what your Christ said, considering he contradicted what your God said.(:
            The bible is all about hate, and you people cant even see it.

          • stj

            go take your medications lady

          • canardnoir

            With the possible exclusion of some Biblical “eye for an eye” arguments, the Scriptures are generally preaching nonviolence.

          • Suzanne Longo

            here were no guns when the Bible was compiled. It’s not in the Big Book. It’s in the Constitution, but you can’t pull the words out to make your point. You have to say the whole amendment. It does not give anyone Carte Blanc to own to own an assault musket.

          • wytworm

            Non-sequitur.

          • USA

            Looks like they are putting presure on a cut to the left of his throat. GOOGLE EXCLUDED INCOME You need to leave this great state of the USA

          • y’allign’nt

            Sometimes I drive over the border from the State of Connecticut to the great State of New York. But I rarely leave my beloved COUNTRY The United States Of America (also known as the U.S.A.)

          • Lena Tomsk

            USA sux, not great.I lived many years in usa, in 11 state. Place sux. Communism is everywhere, no freedom, no matter what gov says.

          • mkultra66

            tin foil is not just for making hats, you know that right?

          • DD4D

            Dude, it’s PUFF PUFF PASS.

          • RUKIDDING

            I along with many others appreciate Sgt. Murphy doing what he knew was right in releasing these photos and showing who and what that piece of crap Tsarnaev is. This was not anything our government did. Our government is not trying to take our bombs away, it is guns. He did not use a gun. If you believe anything other than the truth, and that is that this cutsey little 19 year old was very much involved in the Boston bombing you need to get your head out of the sand. As Sgt. Murphy mentioned, this was real with people losing their lives and many others in which their lives have been forever changed due to their injuries. I as a proud American stand by Sgt. Murphy and wish him well. Thank you Mr. Murphy!!! As for Rolling Stone magazine, shame on you for trying to make this kid look like he is something more than the piece of crap he is. You obviously did not lose anyone or have a family member injured due to this tragic event.

          • Sakeeta Rosen

            Did you even look at those pictures? He didnt have a throat wound, meaning they lied about him not being able to talk.

            They lied about plenty of things.

            And a lot of those people were crises actors, they didnt even get hurt. That guy who supposedly lost his legs, already lost them 2 years prior at war. Different name, same guy.

            I could care less about the people who lost someone, because its their fault for being at such a pointless sheep event anyways. They could have been doing something REAL with their lives. Not watching people kill themselves running.

          • stj

            you’re an idiot

          • juststacey

            “That guy who supposedly lost his legs, already lost them 2 years prior at war. Different name, same guy.”

            Holy crap! Did I really read that?!

            With that comment you have shown the world that you are completely and totally ignorant and delusional and PURE EVIL, and you have ABSOLUTE ZERO credibility.

            What is WRONG with you?! Bitch I’m a life-long Bostonian. Come here, look me in the eye and talk that crazy, completely fabricated shit and see what happens to you. OMFG I can’t believe you actually posted that to a public forum!!!

            “I could care less about the people who lost someone, because its their fault for being at such a pointless sheep event anyways. They could have been doing something REAL with their lives. Not watching people kill themselves running.”

            You are a vicious, self-righteous bitch and you make me sick. First of all, the expression is COULDN’T CARE LESS, you dumb ass, but FAR more importantly, your utter lack of empathy and respect for human life is shocking and appalling.

            And you want marathon runners to do something real with their lives? Like post outright lies on the internet rather then spend time outdoors doing physical exercise and building a strong cardio-vascular system? Killing themselves? Please…

            FYI marathon runners are some of the the fittest and healthiest people on the planet – or did you conveniently miss the picture of 78 year old Bill Iffrig, running in his 45th marathon, being knocked to the ground by the force of the explosion which appeared on the cover of Sports Illustrated as well as many other publications?

            Your ignorance and hate are just beyond words.

          • juststacey

            There’s only ONE reason why I’m not copying and pasting this to his and Carlos Arrondando’s FB pages, and that’s because it would be such a cruel insult to the both of them and I’m just not that kind of mean-spirited person as you obviously are!

          • Sakeeta Rosen

            And I do literally mean killing themselves. Many people have died from running, and there is more than enough evidence that running is bad for us. Just like there is more than enough evidence that the Government was behind all of this.

            They are trying to take our guns, you gotta be brainless to not see the trend. The government lies about everything, its been proven time and time again.

            Our President wasn’t even born here.
            Defending the corrupt government is completely un-American.

          • runnerbp

            So let me get this straight Sakeeta. There’s lot’s of evidence that running is bad for us AND that the Government is behind all this and does it so “they” can take “our” guns but there is no proof that Obama was born here? It’s sort of amusing that the most provable the one you dismiss. I love this. It’s very amusing.

          • FredMurre

            actually it looks like in one of the photos an EMT is applying a dressing to the left side- just below the jaw of Tsarnaev’s throat. There also appears to be blood and bruising around that area. So it is likely he could’ve been shot left right, or back-left.

            At any rate it is moot, because now he can apparently speak after healing and can give verbal testimony.

          • runnerbp

            perhaps you should scrutinize those whose body parts were blown off with equal care my friend.

          • BoDogit3

            No offense it just isn’t there I have no theory as to why the government released this meme but I do not see a wound on his neck. The straight on pic gives a pretty good view of his neck with no injury. Nor does the sweatshirt he is wearing indicate blood soaking consistent from a neck injury. I predict they will redact that statement and claim it was confusion. Confusion that they let the public assume all this time. I have also wondered why they opened fire on a person they from flir could tell wasn’t armed. I am sure there is an explanation for the two hundred or so rounds they emptied into that boat they just haven’t explained to us. Deadly force usually requires ….. etc

          • Gary A

            Your comments might better serve a creative writing course for its wonderful imagination .

          • Adam’and Erica Richardson

            You’re seriously an idiot… You probably subscribe to info wars too huh? The government surgically sliced his throat… GTFO

          • Suzanne Longo

            The officer who released the photos didn’t do that for the reason you are referring to. He did it in protest about the cover of Rolling Stone magazine. His goal was to show that this kid is no rock star – he’s a criminal. My goodness you sure do twist things around.

          • jasonhodges

            See the 2nd last image. Officer is holding a gauze to his throat to stem the blood flow from the injury.

          • HIKER BIKER

            That is the after. Look at the main photo and tell me where the blood is from that so-called throat wound. You can clearly see both sides of his neck and not a drop of blood on it – not even a smear.

          • jasonhodges

            You mus tbe looking at a completely different set of photos to the ones I am looking at,

            http://cdn.bostonmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/113_4510A_21.jpg
            This image the left side of his neck is hidden in shadow.

            http://cdn.bostonmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/113_4470_21.jpg
            This image the left side of his neck is also hidden in shadow.

            http://cdn.bostonmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/113_44851.jpg
            This image his neck is hidden.

            http://cdn.bostonmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/413_3544_21.jpg

            This image the cop is holding ther LEFT side of his neck.

            Where is the photo CLEARLY showing both sides of his neck?

            At the end of the day, there is not a shred of photo or Video evidence THAT HAS BEEN RELEASED to show that they did it.
            It is obvious to anyone with eyes & ears that they have been stitched up.
            My argument is against the comment saying there is no injury not the “Suspect”.

          • HIKER BIKER

            I am not sure if this blowup is going to last. It is all over the Internet. Zoom in on the neck area and it contradicts what the mediocre liar, Gov. Patrick said about him being shot in the throat. It also contracdicts what The Mirror said about him shooting himself in the throat in a bid to commit suicide. Witnesses said he was telling cops not to shoot. How do you do that with a bullet in your throat? And more importantly, how deep will a Bostonian’s head go up their anus? More likely someone saw that Tsarnaev was able to tell the truth and tried to cut his throat – another miserable failure.

          • jasonhodges

            Are you on drugs?? This photo as I said before has the area in question in complete darkness. How on earth can you say there is no injury there. Look at the 2nd last image. The cop/soldier is clearly holding a gauze high up under his left jawline. In the photo you have linked, it is a black area. Where do you think all the blood came from.
            Again, I think they are are being set up, but I cannot stand when even conspiracy nuts just are purely making shit up from the “revealing” photos in front of them.
            Again! The area is dark. There is blood on his face that has possibly run from an injury somewhere when his head was ducked down.
            You cannot say there is or is not a neck injury, but yes they could have sliced him after he was apprehended and before the 2nd last image.

          • HIKER BIKER

            I am surprised that a large portion of the people of Boston are so ignorant that they cannot see the lack of throat wounds in this picture and have ignored every independent witness. Sad for you guys. Try that crap here and see what happens. Thankfully I live in a state with intelligent majorities.

          • runnerbp

            Hahahaha…. Boston is one of the most educated in the world. So you glance at an image and make assumptions. You know who is or isn’t an independent witness and if they were ignored? Very amusing. Thanks.

          • HIKER BIKER

            I think we can now all agree that education has little to do with intelligence. Anyone with average intelligence can read and memorize. So what you are saying is that Boston contains more average people that most cities in the world. That’s not really an impressive factoid. But it explains why so many of you have ignored the evidence in this false flag coverup.

          • Stuart Alderson

            would you feel the same way had you of been sitting or standing next to one of the backpacks that exploded? I highly doubt it, you would be dead. Never knowing why or how. Due process works for civilized folks, not animals.

          • wytworm

            Rights are intrinsic, they do not require civilization. The state and its citizens can only recognize those rights or not. There is no power that enables one citizen to remove rights from another.

            It is a common tactic for one who has fallen from a moral position, or is experiencing a moral conflict to justify immoral treatment of another by declaring them arbitrarily and irrationally ‘not human’ in order to temporarily relieve their conscience. As they are not empowered to actually make someone’ un-human’, this is largely a narcissistic and irrational exercise.

          • Guest

            Rights are intrinsic and do not require civilization until society decides to take them away.

          • wytworm

            The State is not empowered to take them away, only to fail to recognize them. The rights are still there even if the state or its citizens spit on them.

          • xofpi

            Some people need to read their social contract theory more closely. Rights only make sense in a social context, The notion that we have them naturally (pre-civilization) is utterly meaningless. A pretty thought, maybe, but utterly unfalsifiable and hence meaningless.Which isn’t to say that I think rights aren’t important. But they’re utterly useless to people unless they’re recognized by those with power to take them away. Which is why we have to be vigilant about each other’s rights as well as our own,

          • wytworm

            That natural rights are rights not contingent upon the laws, customs, or beliefs of any particular culture or government, and therefore universal and inalienable in no way make them ‘pre-civilization’.

            That they are ‘meaningless’ is a non-sequitur.

            Rights are also not dependent on their utility. You may be confusing ‘natural rights’ with ‘legal rights’.

          • canardnoir

            Actually, his natural rights would be best served by Utah law.

          • wytworm

            How so?

          • canardnoir

            Their “firing squad” method of execution, legal scholar.

          • wytworm

            His natural rights could not be best served by capital punishment as natural law does not sanction capital punishment. This is a good example how the US is out of alignment with natural human rights.

            The argument goes:

            Natural law does not support capital punishment. Execution is only an additional unnatural act of state sponsored murder. If murder is an unnatural act; such should also be kept for the state and the administration of justice. Capital punishment condones unnecessary violence. Execution therefore could not be proportional by reason.

          • bostonmeg

            Except he didn’t “allegedly” kill anyone in Utah did he?

            As for due process, yes, he should have it as he is a U.S. Citizen.

            Don’t worry Massachusetts has been here a long time and we follow the law so he’ll go through the Court process which trust me will protect his rights more than the victims. He’ll get to wage a defense of his actions that day and following days.

          • xofpi

            There is no such thing as a right (of any kind) without someone to recognize it and respect it or not. “Natural right” is pure fiction. Pure fiction. But if it makes you feel better to believe in it, by all means believe in it.

          • wytworm

            Doesn’t this position set you squarely against the Zoroastrians, the Stoics, Martin Luther, John Locke, the Virginia Declaration of Rights, Freeborn John, Francis Hutcheson, Hegel, Richard Price, the Declaration of Independence, the universal Declaration of Human Rights, and the US Constitution?

            How does your positive claim hold up under that weight?

          • xofpi

            I don’t care who it sets me against philosophically as long it doesn’t set me against truth and reality.

            Is there or has there ever been an instance of someone whose alleged natural rights have been of any real use to him if those rights have not been recognized in a social context? Take the alleged “right to life,” which certain of our friends on the religious right (mainly) insist upon for all conceived humans in a way somewhat different from Locke and the Constitution (for example), but nevertheless as something God-given (i.e., nature-given). Is this right “real”? Not according to Roe v. Wade. Does this right do the bearer any good without a social context to give it weight? I’ll let a little thought on your behalf about the good it does a sixteen-week-old fetus prove my point that it does absolutely no good to anyone ever if it isn’t granted by one or ones with power to take it away at any time.

            Clearly, in other words, no individual’s right is ever inherent in any real or meaningful way outside a social context. Which is why, I will repeat, people in a society have virtually no choice but to be vigilant about their rights and those of others if they want them to matter. Rights in themselves are very, very weak tools. If you don’t believe that, try to assert a right to an officer of the law who is prepared to deny you of one. Try to assert one to another individual trying to deny you of one.

            The irony of our little argument here is that I believe Tsarnaev “should” have a right to due process, that this society owes him that as it owes all American citizens that, in keeping with its word given in the Constitution. But do I have utter faith in due process as a natural human right, let alone a legal one? I don’t have the luxury of having faith in anything.

          • wytworm

            Can you confirm your rejection of centuries of study and the underpinnings of the country at hand in the topic all as ‘fictions’? Do you believe that none them exist? Some? Which ones? If natural rights are fictions, can you employ them in support of your own argument? Do they exist or don’t they?

            Setting this aside…

            Is the right to life a positive right or a negative right? Does the distinction matter?

            Are zygotes human at conception?

            Is there a distinction you are respecting between natural and legal rights? Is a 16 week fetus? Is a pregnant woman a human? If you extend human rights to a16 week old fetus, do you concede that an adult great ape is also owed recognition of its rights by the state?

            Rights are most meaningful when not recognized as they serve as an aspirational goal to guide a faltering or fallen state back to a moral position.

            That you believe that he should have a right is morally irrelevant to his having the right. He was born with the right, whether or not it was a birth in the US, it is not granted by citizenship, if he is executed, he will have died with his rights. As long as he is human and alive they are inviolate.

            All the state does is act in recognition or ignore them for other ends. Not even a fallen or failing state can impact the rights owed.

            You shouldn’t be reaching for faith, you should be reaching for reason.

          • xofpi

            Centuries of “study” or centuries of masturbation? It’s in the eye of the beholder.

            What I’m concerned about is truth as it pertains to reality of what I can know and how useful this knowledge is to me. Centuries of “sages” and “savants” declaiming on “natural rights” are useful to me only in the context of an exam on the subject where those questions are treated as serious ones and where the way I answer them has at least some bearing on how well I will do in that class. In the context of my life, however, they mean virtually nothing.

            It all boils down for me to the question of what a “right” is in the context of some entity that does *not* recognize it, and for any given right, there will always be someone or some entity that does not recognize it. This is the whole reason why we have written constitutions and rules, which are meant to spell out our rights (and responsibilities) in a formal way, which makes it somewhat (but not entirely) less difficult to claim a right in every context where it might be useful to those agreeing to play by those specific rules. But constitutions and rules always imply that someone has claimed power to make the rules (and others have yielded power to those rules makers) and, therefore, there is never an instance of a right meaning anything if it is not recognized (and in some cases flat out invented) by the rule-maker(s) in power. All of this, it seems pretty clear to me, implies that our delineated rights mean absolutely nothing if the rules makers suddenly decide not to recognize them. The PATRIOT Act is one of those instances when previously agreed-to rights were suddenly thrown out because supposedly changed circumstances made those rights (against search and seizure and for due process for all citizens) “irrelevant” and even harmful to the new status quo.

            What, really, is a right in the face of a power’s unwillingness to honor it? I’d love to see a serious answer to this, one that doesn’t skip off to the metaphysics of Cloud Cuckooland–in other words, one that explains how the right itself is somehow greater than the power that opposes it to instantly affect the alleged “right”-holder’s life, limb and general safety. Loads of people have lost their lives or control of their lives who theoretically had rights that supposedly should have protected them. I mean why were these rights-holders or even their advocates unable to secure them their rights just by invoking them if rights are really so mighty? The answer is, rights are not mighty. As I said, they’re very weak tools when the powerful choose to become dangerous to rights holders.

            An aspirational goal and $2.50 will get you a ride on the NYC subway.

          • wytworm

            “Centuries of “study” or centuries of masturbation?”

            Non-sequitur.

            “It’s in the eye of the beholder.”

            Are you asserting that philosophy is subjective?Is it not true that the implication of “logic,” if not of reason, is that the syllogism of each thought must have certain patterns of propositions, and those propositions must have basis in fact of some sort or another even if only assumed?

            “In the context of my life, however, they mean virtually nothing.”

            If you live in the US whose constitution was based on natural law, how can this be true?

            “It all boils down for me…does not recognize it.”

            How are you able to evaluate the states calibration without the reference framework of natural law? Are you basing your evaluation just what was there when you were born vs what is there today? Under this model, how could the Constitution even exist today? Ddi it spring in to being fully formed when you were born? Was it instead based on as you claim, centuries of masturbation, and if so, why do you value it enough to care that you are moving further away from masturbation?

            You seemed concerned about the PATRIOT act, but why? The lawmakers changed the law ergo, your rights are reset and you have no complaint. Whatever the lawmakers decide you get you get. If you disagree, upon what does the disagreement hinge? How can you retain the notion that it is wrong to take away a legal right if its not by comparing it to a natural right? Upon what do you make the evaluation?

            Further, i don’t know that even the PATRIOT act declares deprecated rights to be irrelevant, as much as it admits that the state has failed to protect relevant rights in a climate of mass panic, which may or may not even be rational.

            I agree that if the new status quo is based on fear and irrationality, rather than reason, much of the constitution seems misaligned to this proposed status quo.

            “What, really, is a right in the face of a power’s unwillingness to honor it?”

            If by rights you mean legal rights being valueless in a state that has no rule of law, that seems an obvious answer. If you are working in a model that declares humanity valueless and meaningless, indeed, fictitious outside the confines of a state, you are required stop there. No other answer is possible for such people.

            That people have lost their lives while in possession of natural rights is no different that people losing their lives while in possession of legal rights.

            Natural rights are mighty precisely because they do not rely on being invoked.

            It is correct to say neither legal, nor natural rights guarantee a positive outcome to the rights holder.

          • xofpi

            The constitution was based on a **theory** of natural law. It was not **based** on natural law, which doesn’t exist. Unless you want to call “eat or be eaten” a law of some kind, and that’s not what the constitution was based on obviously.

            “Natural rights are mighty precisely because they do not rely on being invoked.” Then they really have no use at all, do they?

            Please give me an example of one of these vaulted natural rights and show me exactly how useful it is to a given person at any given time–including a time, for instance, when they are being deprived of this right by an “authority.” I mean, exactly in that moment, what use is the right to the person?

            (And if you agree that the right is essentially useless at that moment, then explain how you or any one can make any grand statements about its being “inherent” or “natural” and “important.” It would seem to me that the ease–the naturalness, you might say–with which the right is deprived of that person belies that right’s being “natural” or “important” or more to the point **real**.

          • wytworm

            “The constitution was based … based on obviously”

            How is this different than mathematics? Are you arguing that abstractions are meaningless?

            ‘”Natural rights are mighty precisely because they do not rely on being invoked.” Then they really have no use at all, do they?’

            They have as much of a use as say, mathematics. Are you struggling to find a link between abstract thought and concrete action?

            “Please give me an example…right to the person?”

            I can give you an example of a vaulted ceiling, but i cannot give you an example of a vaulted right. It is true that vaulted rights do not exist.

            If you are instead asking about ‘vaunted’ natural rights, I would still not comply, as I do not consider their praise to be excessive.

            If you are instead asking about examples of natural rights being useful to fend of an intruder breaking into your house, no you cannot pick up a natural right off the ground and throw it at an intruder, in the same way you could not throw mathematics at the intruder.

            (And if you…the point **real**.

            Can you provide the causal link between ‘useful’ as you use it, and ‘inherent’, ‘natural’, ‘important’ or my chosen word, ‘intrinsic’?

            Can you show that legal rights or natural rights are required to guarantee outcomes to be, **real**, as you use the term?

          • xofpi

            Yes, of course I meant “vaunted” rights.

            As for your question about “real” rights, the only ones that are real in my view are ones that do have a use, as, for example, those that are recognized in contexts when their not being recognized can endanger one’s life, limb or freedom. And the only such rights meeting that criterion are what you call legal rights, and only when the authority empowered to effectively recognize them actually does recognize them. For example, the right to due process. It’s a legal right, as it’s in the constitution, but there have been innumerable cases since the founding of the republic when the authorities have not recognized it. However, in some cases, authorities can be shamed into recognizing it for whatever reason, sometimes, even when higher authorities require them to. But it’s never guaranteed that higher authorities in this country will require it if a clever enough legal counterargument dissuades them from it.

            Alleged natural rights, unless you can show me one to the contrary, don’t even have this effect. You cannot go to a magistrate, for example, after you’ve been murdered to argue that your right to life has been violated. You cannot go to *anyone* in such cases because, of course, your being dead prevents it. It’s also unlikely that you can even go to your murderer before he pulls the trigger to remind him of your inherent and natural right to life. So what use is that right again? I mean except as something to cheer yourself up in circumstances when it doesn’t need to be invoked–sort of the way the idea of eternal afterlife cheers up slaves and other Christian sufferers in this world.

          • wytworm

            “the only ones that are real in my view are ones that do have a use”

            Is this not just an arbitrary declaration? Is the measure of ‘real’ is whatever you decide based on your ‘view’? Is view another way of saying ‘this is my position’? If so, would it be possible to outline the logical underpinnings for your position?

            “what you call legal rights,”

            I don’t call them legal rights as an invention, everyone is meant to subscribe to a common standard of discourse where words have commonly understood definitions. My advice is that you look up all such terms and make sure you understand what I mean when I use them and to make sure I understand what you mean when you use them.

            “For example, the right to due process. It’s a legal right, as it’s in the constitution…”

            …and its in the constitution because it is a natural right.

            “However, in some cases, authorities can be shamed into recognizing it”

            What is the origin of the shame? If its just arbitrarily placed in the constitution for no particular reason, why would shame be effective?

            “But it’s never …them from it.”

            That there is a legal right that is not followed and is tolerated to be not followed is not an indication that the legal right does not exist any more that the lack of the recognition or understanding of natural rights means that they do not exist. It simply means you are living in a state that is failing and drifting away from the rule of law.

            “Alleged natural rights, unless you can show me one to the contrary”

            Non-sequitur.

            Do the dead enjoy natural rights? I am aware of one study of this question, but remain unconvinced. At any rate, the right to life can be considered as either a positive right or a negative right with one obligating action, and the other obligating inaction. In the US, as in many areas there is a blend of positive and negative legal rights. In the case of a murder, the murderer may be proven guilty of a violation of the negative right to life, and the state may be proven guilty of a violation of the positive right to life of the victim. In either case the victim enjoyed the right, both positive and negative, up to the point of death. THat legal and natural rights do not guarantee outcomes, is not evidence of the lack of legal and natural rights. You are correct that neither legal rights nor natural rights will prevent your murder.

            Are you then arguing that legal rights also, do not exist?

            “slaves and other Christian sufferers”

            Bizarre non-sequitur. Are all slaves christians? Are all christians slaves? Do christians suffer? Do they have a monopoly on suffering?

            “can you… You can’t. Don’t bother trying.”

            Does this answering of your own question indicate that your framework of reality is entirely subjective and declaratory? That is to say, rights are what I say they are because I say so. I am reminded of Nixon’s ‘When the President does it, that means it is not illegal.’ quote.

            I hate to ask, but in your ‘view’ what exactly is precise about math as an abstraction? Everything our society does on a day-to-day basis is an example of the utility of natural rights.

          • xofpi

            “its [due process is] in the constitution because it is a natural right.”

            No. It’s in the constitution because there was a precedence for it in British law in highly specific contexts. That’s the fact. Was it in British law because is a natural right? No, unless by natural right you mean the rights of a certain class of people to have due process of law. If you want to call it “natural right” that’s fine, but realize that the term is highly misleading, as nature has nothing to do with where it comes from.

            “What is the origin of the shame [that can motivate authorities to honoring rights they haven’t honored]?”

            Politics.

            “In either case the victim enjoyed the right [to life], both positive and negative, up to the point of death.”

            The victim was merely alive up to the point of death. He never had an actual natural “right to life” at any point because at any point, his life could be taken from him, by sickness, accident or injustice–or even order of the powers that be. (Much more likely by sickness or accident, however.) So what actually does “right to life” even mean, given this capricious, random nature of life in this universe? It barely means anything.

            It only means (a little) something in the context of a society that bequeaths it generally–but even a society such as that can decide to take your life (by forcibly drafting you and sending you off to be cannon fodder, as this society has done at various major points of its history, for example; or by endowing power to law officers to use weapons against you that could kill you if you’re thought [mistaken or not] to be in the act of committing a violent [or not] crime). I mean, yes, it’s good to have a general “right to life” in a society with armed law officers everywhere, but there are loads of cases when that right in this context won’t get you a cup of coffee if you don’t have some change in your pocket.

            “Are you then arguing that legal rights also, do not exist?”

            No. They’re the only rights that exist. But it’s a dangerous mistake to take them for granted, because they don’t exist very loudly most of the time, until you need them–and then *you* have to assert them, because few will do that for you.

            “Are all slaves christians? Are all christians slaves? Do christians suffer? Do they have a monopoly on suffering?”

            My point restated: belief in natural rights, such as a right to life inherent in nature, is on par with the Christian (for example) belief long inculcated in slaves and other long-term sufferers to not worry about this life, for a better eternity awaits them. I mean specifically that the belief in natural rights, like the Christian belief in the happy eternal afterlife, are feel-good beliefs that cannot be proved false or true, which is precisely their power.

            “I hate to ask, but in your ‘view’ what exactly is precise about math as an abstraction?”

            I’m going to have call you on your own bizarre non sequitur here. There is simply no useful comparison between math and natural rights. There is no intelligent point of comparison there. Math is a real tool that proves its value every time you turn on a computer. You don’t have to assert math for it be useful and real–someone else is already doing it for you. You do have to assert your rights or very few people are going to give a sh!t about them and they won’t do you a lick of good.

          • wytworm

            There was a ‘precedent’, not a ‘precedence’.

            Where do you think the Magna Carta came from? Spontaneous generation? The whole chain of history you claim is fiction, without evidence to back that claim informed both documents.

            In The Natural Law: A Study in Legal and Social History and Philosophy, Heinrich Rommen notes that Bracton and Fortescue retained the conceptions of natural law which it had assimilated during the Catholic Middle Ages.

            So it didn’t spring from nowhere.

            Charles F Mullet, in Fundamental Law and the Revolution 176-1776, noted Bracton’s ‘ethical definition of law, his recognition of justice, and finally his devotion to natural rights.’

            Coincidentally, Bracton was a subject of study for Thomas Jefferson. I could go on at some length, but you get the idea.

            ‘Politics’

            Link politics to shame. The idea is that shame works when there is a moral standard or norm that has been fallen away from and the falling away has been public. If the moral standard isn’t natural law, what is it?

            ‘The victim…means anything.’

            Do rights, either legal or natural guarantee outcomes? If they do not, do either exist? Is this your question? It is true that humans can be alive without legal rights, though in modern society that is just about impossible, but if one is human, and one is alive, and one exists in the natural world, natural rights and duties, and indeed the moral standards to govern human behavior can be, and have been, objectively derived. I think you understand the idea, even if you do not like it, fully understand it, or want it. None of those subjective positions has any influence whatever to their objective existence as a model for human behavior. Nor does that subjective rewrite history, the Declaration of Independence, the US Constitution, nor the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which seek to codify natural rights into legal rights and duties that govern modern society.

            As the executor of the law, the State can succeed or fail to adhere to the legal rights that are codifications of natural rights, and the legislative bodies, over time can succeed or fail to protect legal rights as the States expression of natural rights and duties within a society.

            They cannot however, undo the objective nature of humanity, or of nature itself to unmake natural law.

            That rights exist loudly, strongly, or weakly makes little if any sense. You are employing but not defining special personal definitions for these words which in the absence of context might as well not be there. It does seem clear that whatever definition you are using for the word ‘useful’ this is at the crux of your subjective reality as it is the main enabler to reject objective reality as ‘useless’.

            Without a common framework for discourse, I don’t know that much further progress can be made, however I look forward to your reply.

          • xofpi

            “There was a ‘precedent’, not a ‘precedence’. ”

            Wow. Yer so smaaart. 😉

            You obviously didn’t even want to see if I corrected that, did you? That was your right, you know. Bad sign for your fair-minded participation here.

            Decades of experience tells me when a person you’re trying to dialogue with starts playing prissy schoolmarm with your every post, it’s probably a sign nothing good is going to come out of further dialogue. Ok, teach? .

            I’ll take a look at the rest of your post maybe and if there’s anything there worth responding to, maybe I will

          • wytworm

            “Wow…fair-minded participation here.”

            Is not clear communication to be desired? Word-misuse happens often for many, its not a big deal. Neither is its correction, nor should it be.

            I agree that a common framework for discourse is necessary to any dialogue. If we are unable to navigate to one in a spirit of comity, continuance is not useful.

            I think you will understand, if you may not be able to accept, that you are held to the same standard.

          • xofpi

            I’m open to all sorts of communication, but I have no patience for smart-ass school marms who like to bog discussions down in the minutiae of irrelevancies for whatever reason.

            I’ve got other things to do, though I’m always interested in ideas. I just don’t have the patience to be marmed by you. Even if it’s just a tic on your part, it’s a waste of my time and energy when I’m trying to keep focused on the ideas.

            I may or may not be back, if I find something worthwhile in what you wrote in addition to the “fun” you apparently thought you were having with my typing difficulties.

          • wytworm

            After applying the invective filter, there is nothing to respond to here. Withdrawal accepted Good luck out there!

          • GlobalWorldNewsGuru

            Oh yes lets have Israel’s vigilante rights, steal others properties and then kill the victims or silence him-well guess what this time Snowden has stuff on Israel screwing USA, so don’t try to preach what Israel does to Muslims, we do not want to hear it, we have a constitution formed by our Christian forefathers-and one of its clauses is due process rights which I do not see in in the dual citizen mantra of and by the people who run our congress for Israel and make laws for Israel with no loyalty to USA

          • xofpi

            Interesting conversation you’re having with yourself.

          • Lonny Bubert

            The State is not empowered, yet somehow they do take away rights even intrinsic rights. One may not be able to take away the concept of intrinsic rights, but one sure can suppress those rights to be effectively taken away….same result as not having them at all.

          • wytworm

            A state can fail to recognize or protect rights but they cannot take them away. They are intrinsic. This means they are a humans by virtue of being human.

          • Jess

            I’ve agreed with every single comment you’ve made up until this one. You’re seeing through rose colored glasses. You’re smarter than that.

          • wytworm

            Sorry to lose you! It has nothing to do with rose color glasses. It has to do with understanding your rights and duties and their relationship to the state.

          • Jess

            I understand my rights and duties. But that doesn’t necessarily mean they’re protected.

          • wytworm

            If you understand your rights and duties, you understand that they are protected less and less every day! Do you understand the rights and duties of the accused bomber? Do we have a duty to protect his rights?

          • Jess

            Yes, I am aware. As far as I’m concerned (because I’m not blind to our government), my rights can be taken from me without warning and without my permission. I understand that Dzhokhar Tsarnaev has the right to a fair trial.

          • wytworm

            Almost. They cannot be taken away from you anymore then they can be taken away from Dzhokhar. All the State and its citizens can do is fail to recognize and/or protect them.

          • Jess

            I think you give the State more credit than they deserve.

          • wytworm

            How so?

          • Jess

            This is the sad truth of the nation we live in today. Having ‘rights’ borderlines exclusivity and is monitored by the same people who create loopholes to protect the exclusivity. Americans are getting, for lack of a better word, fucked by our government and the mass majority are too brainwashed to realize it.

          • Al

            Logic is only the begining of wisdom.

            A photo is worth a 1000 words.

            1000 photos of them at the marathon (red handed) will speak volumes…

          • wytworm

            Non-sequitur.

          • ByTheWay

            The guy had a light colored backpack. The pictures showed it. They also showed the bombs were in black backpacks. How do you explain that?

          • Sakeeta Rosen

            I haven’t seen one photo of the surveillance footage they said they had, of him putting the bag down and saying something into a cell phone.

            All the pictures shown of them, showed them walking around like everyone else. There were tons of people with backpacks, and there was an agent talking into an earpiece.

            The footage you sheep were shown, proves their innocence. You’re just too blind to see it.

          • bostonmeg

            Constitutional Rights such as “due process” are in fact only afforded to Citizens of the United States.

            Dzhokar Tsarnaev (along with his mother who is currently a fugitive from Justice) is a U.S. Citizen so he will get his court-appointed Attorney and Trial by a Jury of his peers.

          • wytworm

            It would be more accurate to say that US Constitutional rights are only afforded to citizens of the US when they are being tried in the US.

            The US does not have a monopoly on constitutions or on a concept of due process.

            That the US recognizes this natural right is not the same as saying the US grants this natural right. At best they extend a legal right in recognition of the natural right.

          • bostonmeg

            I actually was commenting directly on Mr Tsarnaev who will be tried in the United States.

            You are correct in that “due process” only applies within the United States and to US Citizens being tried within the United States. If you get into trouble in another Country then you are subject to their laws. Something that some American Citizens seem to forget.

            As for “natural rights” I am not even sure what one would be – the “right to breathe” and who would give you that “right” in the first place? God? Government?

          • wytworm

            I assume you meant to say this in reference to US citizens.

            Aliens in the U.S. have essentially the same legal rights as citizens for many purposes because of the 5th and 14th Amendments’ language, but aliens do not have legal rights against the U.S. government outside its territory.

            Many other countries also extend due process legal rights to non-citizens including citizens from the US.

            Even when a state does not, the person in question still retains the natural right in absence of its recognition.

          • bostonmeg

            Hence why the first sentence stated “directly commenting on Mr Tsarnaev” who is a US Citizen.

          • wytworm

            Hence why my first sentence stated ‘I assume you meant to say this in reference to US citizens.’

          • bostonmeg

            All United States Citizens are guaranteed the right of due process, as is Mr Tsarnaev as I stated above. I am not interested in taking anyone’s right’s away period as I believe our system only works when we follow the letter of the law.

            Have you been this vocal on the loss of Civil Liberties by The Patriot Act? Until recently not many Americans seemed to care all that much about the ever-broadening scope of Government’s ability to circumvent Individual Rights to Privacy, etc. Just curious.

          • wytworm

            “All United States Citizens are guaranteed the right of due process”…unless they are declared enemy combatants.

            You couldn’t take away anyones natural rights if you wanted to.

            Following the letter of the law is only virtuous in a state which has virtuous law.

            My vocality is irrelevant to the topic.

            “Until recently not many Americans seemed to care all that much about the ever-broadening scope of Government’s ability to circumvent Individual Rights to Privacy, etc. Just curious.”

            What data do you have to support this claim?

          • bostonmeg

            It’s amazing how your arguments just keep shifting like sand and you are just trying to pick a fight.

            Save it for someone who wants to play this game with you. I am done

          • wytworm

            Tu quoque. I accept your withdrawal.

          • ctuton

            Due process works for the innocent. Maybe even you if falsely accused. Due process will convict the guilty if the evidence supports it. Your opinion is that of a lynch mob. Due process is for civilized society – not animals.

          • GlobalWorldNewsGuru

            My Point exactly, with all the lies the police are making up as they move along

          • Scott Carriere

            and who is going to judge which is which? You?

          • JAM726

            He is “owed” two in the chest and one in the head as far as I’m concerned.

          • wytworm

            It is people like you that due process protects –even from people like you.

          • runnerbp

            He is owed due process…. and he did it.

          • wytworm

            Irrelevant, but everyone has an opinion for whatever its worth.

          • LouAnnWatson

            but yet he helped him out in the end by running him over

          • Bodhisattva

            Yeah like the current rush to judgment despite the court results in the Zimmerman case. Of course that’s just racists stirring the pot.

          • imachicmom

            He placed the backpack that killed little Martin, it’s on video :(

          • FreeDubay

            I guess the pressure cooker he was carrying in his backpack, I guess he could have thought his brother had put a roast in it for people who we finishing the Marathon. Your point is well made.

          • Arminius

            He probably figured it out by the time he ran him over, and sought to elude the police. Both of which, if memory serves, are against the law.

          • BoDogit3

            unless you are exercising self preservation

          • ignatzman

            A thoughtful and intelligent comment applicable to many situations but not this one.Just the publicly known evidence against this vermin is overwhelming and not subject to reasonable debate. You are correct that in some situations a rush to judgment can be harmful. Always keep in mind however that it is protected by the first amendment

          • wytworm

            Due process is also protected.

          • canardnoir

            Again – a legal judicial concept or doctrine pertaining more toward the formal booking, questioning and preliminary-hearing process.

            Public opinion is exempt, as many may have more recently noted.

          • wytworm

            Its protection is a Constitutional concept.

            I don’t know that anyone is assaulting public opinion.

          • Zephyr

            We can rush to judgement all we like, and the public can assume that because a newspaper mentions “evidence” that “evidence” exists; in the end, none of those things determine what really happened, or make something publicly “known.” Something can really only be known to persons who directly experienced it; after that, a case must be made and accompanied with evidence and sworn testimony, and we hope that the truth is served. Even with fantastic evidence and lots of sworn testimony, we may not know, but it’s the best we’ve got. To say that the public currently “knows” anything about this case yet, though, is simply not possible. It took 15 years to bring out the evidence in favor of a second shooter/conspiracy in the plot to assassinate President Kennedy; I doubt we’ll know deeper truths about the Boston Bombing for a long time to come, but I hold out hope that day will come.

          • runnerbp

            I’m sorry Zeph, but a reality check in order here. There is so much evidence from so many sources that your line of thinking is a relevant as saying you don’t really know if you exist because, well, you could be imagining it.

          • ByTheWay

            In my area a college coach was there and he spoke about a drill was going on at the same time as the Boston Event. Look up how many drills go on at the same time as these type of events. It confuses the people who are doing the drills to know if it is a drill or a real event. Same thing happen with 9/11. “Vigilant Guardian”

          • jamie121

            Bullshit.

          • ByTheWay

            Is that your intelligent response? Did you even look it up? It shows your herd mentality. I pity your lack of individual thinking skills. Do some independent research and you might see the truth and come out of the matrix in which you live.

          • jamie121

            Oh, yeah, I’ve “looked it up” about a hundred times. I’ve seen every bit off evidence that you deluded morons have to present, and again, I say to you: Bullshit.

          • Sarah Roberts

            You’ve seen every bit of evidence, huh?Are you kidding?You haven’t SEEN any evidence!Two guys with backpacks, walking around the corner by ‘Whiskey’s Steakhouse’,and that’s it!The rest is all information fed to you by the media;you haven’t actually seen any of it!

          • GlobalWorldNewsGuru

            911 who done it my friend surely not butter knife wielding imaginary pigmies

          • runnerbp

            Drills happen. Boston is a big city with lots of people practicing to make things work. That is a coincidence.

          • Zephyr

            There was even more evidence, from more sources, in the Kennedy case that very day–far more sources. Some of them within hours. Just saying that the truth of any major crime usually takes a lot of time and effort to establish. It is far too early to establish much of anything in the Boston Bombing.

          • runnerbp

            Actually there was far more video evidence in the Boston case. There was even a cab driver who drove them there. And those bomb materials in their houses….etc. Yes, yes I get it…. the news media and the government of the US, Boston, Massachusetts, the FBI, the CIA and thousands of others are secretly trying to confuse you into thinking that what they are doing is different than what are reallllllly doing. Of course!! How could I have missed it?

          • jamie121

            Doesn’t take much to confuse these dumbbells.

          • jamie121

            I’d say it’s pretty late in the game to discount how they bought the parts for the bombs, left debris of it laying around the apartment, had an escape plan together, were videotaped at the scene with the same bags that were used and were involved in about eighty crimes afterward.

          • ByTheWay

            The pictures I saw that were provided by the FBI the suspect had was light colored. The bomb backpacks were shown as black lying in the street. How do you explain that?

          • letstalkcandidly

            Oops – a new conspiracy theory in the making! Get a life!

          • P1tsz

            My god. This is very true

          • Sakeeta Rosen

            A reality check is in order for you. The Illuminati have their dirty hands in everything, and they are the ones that planned the whole event with the law enforcement. Your way of thinking is completely illogical.

            Have you even looked up the evidence that hes innocent? All your sources are main stream media, and we all know they lie all the time. Its their job to lie.

          • runnerbp

            another example of believing the imaginary over the hard evidence…. reality is hard…. sometimes it hits you in the head

          • Arminius

            You missed a spot with your tinfoil hat: right there, just above your ear.
            Be careful, or the government rays will seep in again, and overpower the voices in your head.

            Can’t be too careful, Sakeeta…

          • GlobalWorldNewsGuru

            are u threatening her/him-this is not Israel v. Palestine this is United States of America where there is free f——g speech

          • jamie121

            Oh Jesus, fer fucksakes.

          • GlobalWorldNewsGuru

            Bingo

          • Jess

            “There is so much evidence from so many sources…” Fox News doesn’t count, runner. Neither does CNN who recanted almost every “BREAKING NEWS” headline they reported about the Boston Marathon Bombing/Watertown Shooting. Who does that leave? Eye-witnesses who were actually there and saw what happened, right? Correct me if I’m wrong, but I believe there have been several whistleblowers (government employed and all) and average Joe Shmoe’s who deny with absolute certainty that these events were committed by the Tsarnaev brothers, and even more witnesses who can testify to being warned of a “drill” that happened the day of the Marathon. Using mainstream media as a “source” and I-have-the-story-first-bullshit as “evidence” is deeply concerning.

          • runnerbp

            Sorry friend….too many sources. Your conspiracy is equivalent to an “everyone is looking at me” paranoia. It’s like saying nothing exists unless you participate in it. In fact are you sure the you that you think you are is real and participating? Prove it.

          • Jess

            “Sorry… [there are obviously] too many sources [to list],” said every brainwashed media robot there ever was. And for the record, I’m not a conspiracy theorist. I’m a realist. I base my view points off of logic and solid evidence, not hearsay.

          • Shelagh Delves-Broughton

            No u r a conspiracy theorist unable to hear how ridiculous you sound

          • GlobalWorldNewsGuru

            Really then here is a conspiracy for you, is Israel stealing Arab land and killing them for land and artifacts?

          • runnerbp

            I’m not aware of that take on things. I think it’s about time the Palestinians got a homeland and I think it should be done now. Israel should stop building in contested lands .and Arab and Persian groups should stop treating Palestinians like dirt as well

          • Shelagh Delves-Broughton

            I have a funny feeling that “The Protocols of the Elders of Zion” is number 1 in your library and that you do very little but rant away on the Internet bout every Jewish conspiracy you can dream up as well as every anti Muslim conspiracy…..you poor deluded fool.

          • http://www.facebook.com/people/Paul-Cowan/100001288048855 Paul Cowan

            That’s not a conspiracy theory, though, is it?

          • Former Wheeler Resident

          • Jana Stewart

            and that’s exactly what a brainwashed robot living in a mental coma would say, you demonstrated that perfectly. we know you are participating in creating another Germany 70 yrs ago with your words and are part of the American nightmare, gestapo and all. and they’ve got you believing its for your own safely and security – WOW…

          • LiberalHypocrisy

            Please seek professional help.

          • GlobalWorldNewsGuru

            Brain washed pro Israel Media in favor of a Muslim kid-Gosh I have not had a good laugh for ages but today I did-u sad sorry pathetic homophobic clones every fricking US Media wants blood but only Muslim blood they suck it taste it inhale it and pass the taste on to their kids

          • runnerbp

            so define “solid” and “here say” for me. There are hundreds of pieces of information that point directly to DT and it is quite logical to conclude that he, even by his own admission, is a fanatical murderer.

          • GlobalWorldNewsGuru

            the older brother was in custody stripped naked when shot, or produce the accomplice who was striped naked by police. This kid is innocent of all crimes except one-he is Muslim and thereby fair game

          • runnerbp

            Sorry dude or dudette. He and his bro are murderers and I don’t care what fanatical reason they had for it. If you are a Muslim I am fine with that. But don’t use a persecution complex to create an imaginary reality.

          • Arminius

            Look, chief: the correct answer isn’t usually somewhere between the extremes. Gravity exists, or not? Well, the answer isn’t ‘sometimes’.

            Sophistry is fun. But, it’s also typically bull***t.
            As you so elegantly exemplify.
            Thanks for playing.

          • Guest

            I didn’t understand your comment until I read back my own. “Weren’t committed by the Tsarnaev brothers.” Were not. That was my mistake, hopefully you understand my point now.

          • Jess

            Exactly. Either the Tsarnaev brothers bombed the Boston Marathon, or they didn’t. They killed the MIT officer, or they didn’t. They hijacked a car and threatened the hostage’s life, or didn’t. There’s absolutely no room for gray area in this case. Yet testimonies given by lead witnesses (i.e. Danny, the “anonymous” car-jacking victim) have coincidentally changed not once, not twice, but THREE times (each recorded and published by MSM) to cover up the truth. And what about contradicting statements made by runners and bystanders at the marathon who were warned about a “drill” and asked to “keep calm”. Why is government denying that such a drill took place? Were these people just making it up — were they pulling it out of their asses? What about the statement made by BPD claiming Jahar Tsarnaev had a weapon in the boat with him and attempted to commit suicide before capture, missed, and that’s how the wound on his throat came about. But this was later recanted, as investigators discovered that, in fact, no weapon was found in the boat and pictures (like the ones above) reveal no neck wound at all before he climbed out. Meaning he sustained the injury while in the care of BPD after capture. And why was it originally reported that the neck wound was a gunshot wound, when in an interview, an officer (I assume accidentally) admitted that it looked more life a knife gash. Like someone had taken a knife to his neck in an attempt to silence him.

            So, yes. You’re absolutely right. The answer isn’t between the extremes. There can only be a right or wrong answer. I encourage you to do all the research — look at the “evidence”, read all the interviews, study every picture closely, listen to the scanner audio…

            and rethink yours.

          • runnerbp

            I can only say YIKES!!! Do you drive a car? If so I am really scared because you probably think the government put stop lights up as a conspiracy to make you think you have to stop….. but you know better…. don’t you…

          • Jess

            I drive a car that has twice been ticketed by street cameras controlled by for-profit companies. Which appear to be everywhere nowadays, our government must be broke… oh wait.

          • juststacey

            So in other words, you were caught breaking the law.

          • Jess

            You shouldn’t fear for me, you should fear for you. I know I do. I don’t understand why it’s so hard for people to believe our government is capable of such things. You are naive, runner. Do this country, my generation, and future generations a favor by reading up on wikileaks, CISPA, US drone strikes, (most recently) NSA spying, etc., etc. before you jump to the defense of people who are trying to strip you of civil liberties.

          • P1tsz

            This is the best statement that supports INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY BY TRIAL. I’m a catholic not a Muslim. But I don’t judge either.

          • Jana Stewart

            great, a human awake, aware with a mind of their own speaking words of sanity and fact. nice to meet you amidst the bleating of the brainwashed sheep mentality of most here arguing and fighting for their limitations! if interested in the truth of this ‘event’ go to change dot org and sign the petition The United Nations – Investigate the Involvement of the US Government in the Boston Bombings.

          • LiberalHypocrisy

            You need help. Seriously.

          • runnerbp

            OK. You tell who counts. I would certainly not use any single source for “facts”.

          • Former Wheeler Resident
          • Jana Stewart

            conspiracy theory is a phrase that govt and its main stream media feeding tube created to keep perpetuating myth of their version of truth in play with the average blindly believing ‘sheep’ mentality that laps it up without a single question or inquiry of their own. in sociology it’s called uncritical thinking and is the most dangerous of all – case in point the mass of blindly believing German citizens 70 yrs ago. get very familiar with it people because that is what you have created in the US complete with thousands of gestapo brainwashed military and police in tanks with assault weapons invading streets and peoples’ homes looking for one unarmed scholarship university student / Harvard life guard. you tell me you don’t live in a martial law police state, citizens having their constitutional rights, freedoms and privacy taken away by that righteous ‘service to the people’ govt you think you’ve got – a real American nightmare. wake up people- get minds of your own…

          • KC

            You are arguing with DHS/CIA disinfo agents and provocateurs, no normal American in their right mind is willing to go to bat so hard with persistence to defend the government. They most likely don’t even live in the US. …Alex Jones first broke the story of the false flag, they have pics at infowars.com and utube of the exploded backpack with a logo on it,up close the logo is from ”CRAFT” mercenary services. Another pic shows the CRAFT ops wearing the exact backpack with the logo, now the pic of kids without the so called ”bullet wound” in his throat…they cut his throat….don’t waste your time with these idiots…the new world order is going to swallow them are their families up too.

          • Jana Stewart

            ya I know. thanks for sharing KC. I’m aware of the mosquitoes and what they do but they’re irrelevant. maybe they’re desperate for a paycheque to feed their kids and keep their homes. I hear ya!

          • Name

            Yes KC, I should have my government paycheck in the mail by Thursday.

            You know what, you should probably kill your family and yourself before we (the NWO) come and do it more painfully in the FEMA camps. I await with anticipation to see your blood run thick on the news :)

          • GlobalWorldNewsGuru

            No there is no reality check except a open court case not a military tribunal or a secret court but until an open unbiased court with peers as jurors convict an innocent man as proven guilty in a court of law not under the patriots act or some Kangaroo Court

          • GlobalWorldNewsGuru

            innocent until proven guilty was what my forefathers set as the underlying rules-everything else including the Patriots act is a violation of the principals upon which this country was built upon

          • daitheflu29

            Umm innocent until proven guilty is used in the court of law / not court of public opinion

          • hodgicus

            The truth about the Lusitania was declassified in the 70s, when the WWI generation was in their dotage and dying off. Many, many, many dittos to come.

          • ByTheWay

            So your opinion is that governments have never attacked their own citizens to push an agenda? Say like gun control or more spying by NSA to be justified. CIA had never done anything to help push and agenda? Hummm, that isn’t the history I have read.

          • jamie121

            The general opinion is that you would have to have a pretty predetermined point of view and reason to want him to be innocent to not see that that’s not the case in this situation.

          • ByTheWay

            No, it means I don’t buy or swallow everything the media tries to sell. I step back and look at the facts not hearsay.

          • MrCrackKills

            By definition, everything you “step back and look at” as “fact,” is truly hearsay, because you weren’t there to directly witness any of it. In truth, you are still only doing what most others are doing. Taking in the information provided to you and forming your own opinion about it. Unless you were there, and witnessed the acts of the accused with your own eyes and ears, it is all hearsay to you. Don’t get all high and mighty like you are better than everyone else and can tell the truths from the fallacies in events that you had no involvement with.

            That being said, here is my opinion. I doubt that the government fabricated all this information to make this scumbag look guilty when he was actually innocent. How would they make him engage in pursuits with the police while throwing improvised explosives at them? It’s one thing to frame someone and have them peacefully arrested in their home. It’s another to frame them and then have them try to kill police officers and run over their own brother while trying to escape.

          • Jana Stewart

            illustrating your own opinion in last statements are factless hallucination. check fact – the brothers’ uncle works with the CIA for several years, lived with and married a daughter of former CIA vice chairman of house ‘intelligence’ council Graham E. Fuller. fact- kid wore light color backpack with NO WEIGHT in it before and AFTER explosions in photo and vid. at the scene eyewitness reports that police suv ran over older brother and shot him multiple times AFTER being in custody. photo here shows unarmed kid climbing out of boat by himself not saturated in blood. a few minutes later AFTER being in custody is arriving to hospital in critical condition unable to speak. just a few facts.

          • LiberalHypocrisy

            Sorry, he looks pretty but he’s a murderer. Face it.

          • MrCrackKills

            “Not saturated in blood?” Are we looking at the same picture? His face, hands, and hoodie are all covered in blood! Also, what do your listed “facts” have to do with this kid’s actions? None of the Police forced him to make or use homemade bombs, or shoot at Police. The kid’s a scumbag, plain and simple.

          • Sally Turnip

            The FBI loves to play these games. In the WTC bombing in 1993, the FBI infiltrated a group of terrorist (The Blind Sheik) planning to bomb the WTC by placing a bomb in the parking garage. Instead of arresting them, they got an operative inside and he was supposed to supply them with explosives that DIDN’T WORK. Well they decided to get their material from another source, disappeared on the operative, and there was a bombing. The talk on the playground is a similar situation in Boston. The problem here was the two boys went “Off the Reservation” and they lost track of them. They know something was going to happen because they helped in the planning, but they lost them. That’s why the manhunt during the marathon. That’s why all the agencies searching, but not finding. The Government knew everything, but they thought they could stop it and save face. They guessed wrong.

          • Scott Carriere

            How did engage the police? He had no gun! No gun was found. And for government lies, well lets see,,,, gulf of Tomkin, government lie,,,,,,,,USS liberty,,,government lie,,,,,,,,9-11,,,government lie,,,,,,,,,,,reigstag building in Germany,,, government lie,,,,, how many more would you like. Believing the government is delusional.

          • Name

            We’ve got a nut job conspiracy theorist on the loose.

          • P1tsz

            Correct

          • LiberalHypocrisy

            Did you look at the photos of him placing the backpack next to the little boy killed and his sister? Or, do facts like those not support your argument so you just don’t consider them.

          • ByTheWay

            No, I am not aware of those photos please provide link.

          • hodgicus

            No, I didn’t see that on camera and neither did you.

          • Victor

            Glad to know you are so smart and able to figure this stuff out. Remind us of that the next time you are accused and people want to kill you.

          • crankyoldone

            Brought to you by those same folks that served up Bengazi and ” it was a Video “!

          • jamie121

            Right, because that conspiracy theory hasn’t been debunked a million times.

          • Sakeeta Rosen

            There is tons of evidence that the whole thing was planned, and faked. That they were completely innocent. The problem is, you are only looking for evidence that hes guilty. Look for the evidence that hes innocent, there is a lot more of it.

          • ignatzman

            You are frighteningly delusional, I am sure you also believe that the Holocaust never happened and that the Jews or the American Government or both orchestrated the 9/11 attacks

          • GlobalWorldNewsGuru

            So u have been watching the international news after all!

          • Scott Carriere

            Oh come on you not one of those dummies that believe 19 men crawled out of a cave and got lucky. That they went to school for a couple of hours and became expert pilots. That a building ” # 7″ never hit by a plane and had a few small fires collapses into it’s own basement at free fall speed. that fires can burn for weeks underground without oxygen. come on your not that dumb,,,are you?

          • ignatzman

            In my life I have noticed that conspiracy theorists like yourself are almost always frustrated individuals who are glaring failures in one or multiple important aspects of their lives be it financially ,socially or whatever. The 9/11 attacks were years in the planning and well financed . The terrorists did not emerge from caves and some lived in the US for extended periods.. The pilots attended flight schools for many hours and I believe that some or all were officially certified to fly the planes that were used .In order for this to be a government operation it would have had to have been an operation that required the cooperation and silence of so many individuals as to make it logically impossible. There is a better chance of a snowstorm outside of where I am writing this where it is 100 degrees then there is that the government orchestrated 9/11 I am sure you believe the Jews did it as part of some vast Zionist conspiracy.

          • daitheflu29

            Crawled out of caves ? These were Saudis / not some cave dwelling Taliban .. You realize how many thousands of people it would take to coordinate 911 and then rely on not one person to step forward admitting involvement .. Conspiracy theorist pick out only the evidence that advances their theories. Every possible piece of evidence you’ll say points to a conspiracy can be shown as not being a conspiracy at all – the way you do that is by weighing everything together then making a sound judgement based on the facts presented. Building 7 wasn’t hit by a plane but was hit by the collapse of a 1300ft tower.

          • Scott Carriere

            so getting hit by a tower causes collapse , at free fall speed into the basement?

          • Scott Carriere

            They said they pulled the building. THEY SAID THAT.

          • Arminius

            Yes, especially the people who were killed or dismembered. Giving up a limb or two to put on a show is QUITE the demonstration of acting ability, yes?

            Shameful.

          • GlobalWorldNewsGuru

            Not really that is real only the real killers are not

          • Sarah Roberts

            If I had lost any of my limbs in a bombing,I’d be livid over people calling me a liar,how about you??.Not a single word has been said by the outraged victims, while they are basically being called stinkin’ liars .Doesn’t that seem odd to you?There are supposedly; ‘at least 260 victims’,( which to this day, the number of victims continues to remain fluid) and not a one of them has made so much as a peep over being referred to as frauds!

          • P1tsz

            Right

          • bostonmeg

            Sakeeta – WERE YOU THERE?

            Do you know any of the police who worked for days on this case? Know anyone injured or killed?

            No?

            Then please shut up about the “conspiracy”. It’s insulting. And for the record none of us were glooking for evidence of his guilt. These two brain trusts thought that engaging the police in a gun battle in a residential area was a smart move and then he wrote out his confession in detail inside the boat.

            Don’t bother ripping me a new one – I already know what you will say but I was on that corner that day & will never forget it.

          • Sarah Roberts

            Exactly, what corner would that be?You just compressed the entire Tsarnaev saga into a couple of sentences.So, you say there is some magical corner where the entire thing could be witnessed?Sounds more than likely that you have a crystal ball,seeing as you are so absolutely sure.Are you a wizard?Wow,a wizard!

          • bostonmeg

            I just borrowed your crystal ball since you are convinced that that Mr Tsarnaev couldn’t possibly have done what he has said he did. It’s all a conspiracy by the Government or we are all rushing to judgment right?

            Since you have obviously never been to Boston, let alone where the finish line is (if you had you would know that Darmouth Street intersects with Boylston Street, hence a corner, and from that vantage point on Marathon Monday you saw enough to see the carnage caused by the blasts.

          • Sarah Roberts

            That’s right Sakeeta.Actually all anyone has to do is be observant when reading,or watching anything concerning this case.Discrepancies abound.How about an extremely doped up Jeff Bauman(surgical painkillers)identifying Tamerlan Tsarnaev as the man who placed a backpack on the ground.He ‘looked into the eyes of the man that was going to try to kill him’.But wait,he then describes him as wearing dark hat,black jacket & sunglasses.If he was wearing sunglasses,how’d you ‘look him in the eyes’ numbnuts?

          • JulieInAustin

            It’s not at all unheard of for a younger sibling who is isolated from his family to be influenced to do absolutely horrible things by an older sibling, or some other charismatic figure, with an agenda.

            I don’t think the guy is innocent, but I’m waiting for the rest of the facts to come out. And that seems very constitutional-right-to-be-tried-by-a-jury and not so tried-by-court-of-public-opinion.

          • bostonmeg

            I don’t give a hoot if his brother pressured him into this – he was old enough to know that it was wrong and as an adult he is accountable for his actions.

            I hope he gets his day in court. I hope he has a story to tell that explains some of it but there is no justification for doing what he & his brother did.

          • Rod F

            It’s called ‘due process’ but as a criminal attorney you should already know that.

          • GlobalWorldNewsGuru

            Halleluiah

          • FreqZeus

            Your kafkaesque line of reasoning is exactly why we have the need to prove guilt BEFORE we condemn any person (whether innocent or guilty).

            Do you think that what the media produces, alone, is enough to rule against a suspect?

            If that happened, I’d start obeying the media, before the law itself, and in that situation, so should everyone too.

            As a point for you to ponder: if an action done by someone to break down the social system in which we live, ends up removing freedom of speech, or the right to a fair trial. Would that attempt have failed, in its goals?

          • ignatzman

            Your comment is intellectual babble, makes no sense and the use of the term Kafkaesque does not make you intelligent. The point of my comment is simple and irrefutable .In a court of law an accused is protected by all rights guaranteed by our constitution. Outside of courts individuals are free to render opinions based upon available information. This is protected by the first amendment. It is the responsibility of the legal system to make sure that outside influences do not prevent a fair trial for an accused.

          • FreqZeus

            There you go again, blindly dismissing without reason. So the reasons, that you think you know, are enough for a guilty verdict, no, punishment itself?
            The use of a one term, does not make me intelligent, but your continued dismissal of anything but your opinion, proves that you aren’t.
            Your pitchfork looks like it nearly sees the shed. The facts are not out. The case has just started to move towards that part. I think that he MAY have killed 3 people, but the court will have be better equipped to judge him.

            This isn’t an open and shut case. In the aurora case, the guy killed 12, and no one doubt’s or contests that. The matter at question in that case, is why. In this situation, no one has definitive proof yet.
            I hope the guy in the article gets justice, no less, and no more. I personally think that he looks more guilty, than innocent, but that is not my call.

          • ignatzman

            Based on your comment it seems that we agree more than disagree. My commenting on this subject began in response to someone implying that the public had no right to voice an opinion on this individuals guilt because he was innocent until proven guilty. I responded by explaining that innocent until proven guilty is a legal concept applicable only in a court of law and that the public is entitled to express opinions on the subject. The last three lines of your latest comment are completely reasonable and fit exactly into my original point.You are exercising your first amendment rights and I would endorse it word for word except I would add the word way before more guilty. The final call is of course a court of law

          • FreqZeus

            We do agree on most points, but we don’t agree on everything.

            Now our freedom gives us the right to speak freely, but not without exceptions.

            Innocent till proven guilty, is not only a legal tool or concept, it is how he is regarded in all but personal opinion. No one has a right to force anyone to say something, or withhold it, so long as that doesn’t step on the rights of others. That is a small exception, but a key one, in regards to our statements (not views) towards the accused.

            The court should find him guilty, that’s where the ball seems to be rolling. I can’t really see any way for him to walk out of this case. What is it, 17 counts that could carry a life sentence?
            I’d want him to buy me a lottery ticket, if he walked out.

          • Sarah Roberts

            I am certain that the evidence must be weak,I’ve discovered through my own investigation that it is down right pathetic .No defense attorney is going to counsel their client to plea not guilty to all charges.A plea agreement dropping many of the charges in exchange for life in prison would be the standard.I wonder if Edward Snowden knows a little something about this case? They have an ace up their sleeve,take my word for it.

          • hodgicus

            It is always facile to gobble one side of a story whole before hearing the other.
            There is a great deal of reasonable debate to which the evidence is subject.
            The frantic campaign to color the evidence black and smear it across the public mind is more reasonably suspect than the bloody unarmed man in these photos.

          • jaimzdean

            ignatzman…as a criminal attorney, ignoring all other ‘evidence’ you ‘know’ of in this case, what do the photos above say to you? that is, are these photo’s by themselves enough to say the man covered in blood is guilty of the crimes he’s accused of. and if not, then what other evidence that you explicitly know of, what other evidence can be used in conjuction with these photo’s that might clarify your stance that Tsarnaev is guilty?

          • Steven

            Does the phrase “lynch mob” ring a bell?

          • wytworm

            …or a gong!

          • DD4D

            Great band…

          • LouAnnWatson

            zimmerman

          • mlaperle

            Your opinion depends on the circumstances. What is driving public opinion? Is it a bunch of misguided race baters as in the case of George Zimmerman? Or is it common sense analysis of the facts at hand, as in the case with the POS Boston Bomber? Key term: “common sense”.

          • DD4D

            Common sense would dictate that when an official asks you NOT to pursue someone, and you do, and you kill that person (who is about half your age), you’re a douche bag and you get what you deserve. I can’t wait until I read about Zimmerman dying at the hands of a vigilante. I’ll frame that shit.

          • Anthony

            Would you kindly walk down my street, you see I’m also a community watch person.
            p.s, don’t forget your hoodie.

          • pbob67

            And who/what is the driving force behind the public opinion?

          • LiberalHypocrisy

            I guess the photos of him dropping the explosive backpack casually next to the 8 year old boy who died and his sister pretty much told me what he was.

          • Nick099

            Well said. I agree.

          • sandlapper

            OMG – thank you! Awesome comment.

          • @nickk330

            Just look at the pictures… He supposedly had a throat wound that didn’t allow him to talk. But in the pictures, his throat looks fine. Or we can look at the fact the FBI is blocking the autopsy release of an acquaintance of the younger brother who lived in Florida who the FBI questioned and then shot twice in the head (all while he was unarmed). Or lets look at the fact the younger brother wasn’t armed but yet the police shot dozens of bullets into the boat. Or the fact that there is no evidence that the brothers ever had the bombs or placed the bombs at the event. Or the fact that this event only killed three people but yet the region of Boston was turned into a martial law zone. Or that there is no evidence that the brothers ever stole a car or killed the police officer. It’s all just stuff they have told us happened. The same people who cover up the NSA spying, PRISM, Benghazi, killing of innocents with drones… and we are just supposed to believe what they tell us?

          • Kelsey Randolph

            clearly in one of these pictures you can see an officer putting pressure on the side of the neck.
            Let’s not be stupid. Of course they aren’t telling us everything…and rightfully so. Can you imagine what the general population would be like if we knew every dirty detail? Riots would be out of control. They are keeping as much peace as the can. They aren’t going to show the public every miniscule detail they’ve found for charges against this man, it’s an open case. They don’t share the findings of every other case so why show us this.
            It is because of people like you that they do not share everything. I would be ashamed to know what you would do with that kind of information. “You can’t handle the truth”
            I’m just glad I can live in my home knowing I’m not in the middle of a rebel war…fighting for my life.

          • @nickk330

            He was talking when he came out of the boat, he obviously was fine until the FBI got a hold of him. What would cause riots? if they admitted it was a false flag (you probably don’t know what that is) event? How can you saw “rightfully so”? The government works for us, we should be able to know almost everything (except for cases of national security, which this is not the case). Don’t believe that the government knows whats best for you. Only you know whats best for you.

          • J. REX CROUCH

            The Koch Bros run the world. You only THINK you have a “HOME”. The “Governments” of the “Countries” of the are world are now only pro-forma shells. Empathy has no chance against “industrialized” Greed. “Humanity” is being trampled by the boots of mankind’s “PROGRESS”.

          • Geezergardener

            The injury was on his left side and in the dark so it’s unseen.

          • @nickk330

            He was talking when he got out of the boat. And an injury to the side of the neck wouldn’t effect the vocal cords which are located in the front.

          • guest

            were you there? i didnt think so, so how exactly would you know he was talking, because someone told you so im still trying to figure out your facts? you claim all of the ones that the public receive are from the gov’t and media and they are just lies pure lies, so what are your sources?

          • Kev Mercer

            Did you lose a 8 year old son, brother. Did you lose a 25 year old brother, father. Is your sister going to be using prosthetic limbs for the rest of her life. “Only Three People”, was it one of your family members, a loving husband, a daughter from a far off land. Injured 200 plus people, Killed a policeman, were on their way to NYC to do the same thing they did here in Boston. Found in a stolen car, attempting to evade the police. Come on multiple bullets in the boat, this idiot wouldn’t have survived, he would have looked like Swiss cheese.when they carried him out. Conspiracy, conspiracy and more conspiracies. Fact is they got this moron and his idiot brother dead to rights.

          • @nickk330

            I don’t know why the type of person that died or was injured has any relevance to the inaccuracies of the storyline. Again, show some evidence, besides the FBI saying it, that the brothers killed a police officer or that they stole the car. As for the multiple bullets, just take a look at the boat. http://i.imgur.com/pGucRB5.jpg

          • bfiller

            Why do you believe this picture isn’t fake too?

          • Ralfine

            Are you really interested in the suffering of innocent people?

            Would you ask the same questions to all the families killed by US drones?

          • Kev Mercer

            I didn’t vote for your Imperial President, I don’t condone the drone attacks. I don;t like the fact that the NSA, FBI, CIA or whatever other Acronym you would like to mention spies on Americans.. Talk to the gentleman that had his car stolen, talk the family of the officer that was shot and killed. The mother and father of the child killed. Fact is they got these guys dead to right. Due process, what about due process for the victims in this carnage. They are terrorist, they will always be terrorist, they lived the life of terrorist and they will die like most terrorist either by their hand or the hand of justice. In their case just has prevailed. My only hope is he will be charged in the Federal system so all possible punishments are on the table.

            Rolling Stone magazine is a piece of garbage, and to compare him to Jim Morrison is a travesty.

          • Ralfine

            Who tells you it was him and not some three letter agency, in order to get you closer to martial law?
            And if you wanted to prevent future attacks, would it be helpful to learn how this happened?
            Supposedly done by someone who grew up in America?
            Where did you fail to instill in him the idea of freedom?

          • Kev Mercer

            Conspiracy, conspiracy theories. He done it, now is the time for him to pay the piper. I didn’t fail him, the country didn’t fail him. He and his brother failed themselves. Time to resurrect “Old Smokey” for this murdering terrorist.

          • Ralfine

            If you never ask why, you will always come after the crime, filling up your prisons until nobody is left in the “land of the free”.

            You are like a doctor who is happy of all the sick people because they make him rich.

          • kenuch

            You wasting your time trying to make some sense with potential terrorists. People who if they had the chance, would have acted worse than these two piece of **** brothers.

          • MrSmith210

            Hey “Kev” … Bush used drones too. And the spying you’re mad about ALL stems from the “Patriot Act” that Bush put in place. So your obsession to obviously want to pin today’s “spying” issues on the Obama admin. is, well.. as usual.. wrong. Granted Obama hasn’t undone any of the things the Bush admin put in place, but if you think that would even be possible without people like you lining up to claim he’s a terrorist you’re delusional. Do some research and look into where drones came from. Also look into the legality of why gov’t agencies are allowed to spy on us. Where were you when the rest of us normal people weren’t loving every terrible move the Bush admin made and freaking out about the “Patriot Act” !? Instead of now seeing it’s results in action and now acting like it somehow is about our “Imperial President” and his doings? Pathetic bro. Pathetic.

          • ByTheWay

            So I assume you agree with the NDAA that Obama signed by executive order on Dec,31, 2011 when congress was out of session? When will people realize there are no left or right” It is to give you an illusion of choice when in reality they are one in the same. A great picture of this is to imagine going down two hallways one goes left and the other goes right but which ever you choose leads you straight to the slaughter house.

          • RUKIDDING

            Yea, it’s all just stuff. I’m sure your right about all your FACTS. Get real…………..

          • jill815

            So I guess the picture where they are applying pressure to a wound on his neck are posed. You do know that once it enters the body, a bullet continues to travel and can do damage internally? And his brother was older, not younger. And the interviews with the guy whose car they stole were all over the media. I’ll bet you think we never landed on the moon, either.

          • @nickk330

            No, I said the younger brother’s acquaintance from Florida. I know the older brother is dead. The acquaintance was a friend of the younger brother who was shot dead by the FBI at his home in Florida. Why would they shoot an unarmed kid? Chances are, because he knew too much about what really happened. Also, I do believe we got to the moon. (Besides there’s more proof of us landing on the moon than there is evidence of the brothers doing the bombing…)

          • ME-B

            I agree. Just because the cops say he wrote “Fuck America” inside the boat doesn’t make it so. Where are the photos? Where is the proof? At first I discounted a lot of the conspiracy theories regarding this, but a lot of what I’ve read doesn’t add up. When the boy showed up for his court date, why did US Marshals have to be there? Hummers? Really? The uncle in Maryland is incredibly well-off. How did that happen? The government is up to something, something here is being covered up; I wonder if we will ever find out what that is.

          • runnerbp

            Why don’t you go to the victims and analyze their wounds for accuracy. What a bunch of paranoid delusional crap.

          • @nickk330

            I present facts, you present insults. Typical of someone who is blind to what is really going on around them.

          • Griffin

            Idiots like you are the Reason why criminal attorneys have such a bad reputation!

          • ignatzman

            On the contrary. You are obviously clueless and uneducated as to any aspect of our country’s legal system. More than likely you are clueless and uneducated in most matters. I and many others fear for the future of our country,

          • wytworm

            presumption of innocence n. a fundamental protection for a person accused of a crime, which requires the prosecution to prove its case against the defendant beyond a reasonable doubt. This is opposite from the criminal law in many countries, where the accused is considered guilty until he/she proves his/her innocence or the government completely fails to prove its case

          • ctuton

            This is one of the things wrong with the public-mind at large. It is willing to convict people without any evidence proving guilt. It is willing to form opinions and policy without any facts. The ignorant and uninformed public moves in the direction it is told to move by those who control the message and spin. You are a highly manipulated individual without objectivity. I would not hire you to defend me if you were the last attorney on Earth.

          • JAM726

            I believe you meant piece of human excrement*

          • Ralfine

            So? Then other people are entitled to their opinion as well? Even if theirs differs from yours?

          • ByTheWay

            I am shocked by your statement! Especially after the knowledge of Tawana Crawley and Duke Lacrosse. Those were all lies and yet the public was ready to lynch them before they were found innocent and so called victims admitted to lying.

          • ignatzman

            Of course the first amendment is subject to abuse and misuse. It even protects Nazis who put forth their filth. The two cases you cited are nothing like the Boston case. Absent some vast government conspiracy which is extremely unlikely and paranoid, this individuals guilt is overwhelming.

          • BoDogit3

            “this individuals guilt is overwhelming” <– really?
            Rather than arguing over the voluntary nature of alleged confessions of people we are told are in such grave condition they cannot speak and who were not provided legal counsel. How about you just direct us to the video of this kid planting a pressure cooker that we have all been told exists but has never been shown. That should be help establish his guilt you defacto state is overwhelming. So far all I have seen is that he was at the marathon with a light colored backpack that doesn't match the description of the black backpacks that were used. No offense but that should be simple enough considering they told us the video exists. No tin foil hats required. Just link the video.

          • ByTheWay

            Educate yourself on MKULTRA.

          • crankyoldone

            And I believe it was MY GOVERNMENT !

          • BoDogit3

            of course and if you are a criminal attorney and have ever tried a case that received even moderate media attention you are also completely aware that the information released to the media is often done so to sell a point, theory, and or confuse or taint a jury pool. Rarely is the media correct if the story came from prosecution source prior to trial.

          • Sakeeta Rosen

            A criminal attorney? That is a great reason NOT TO LISTEN TO ANYTHING YOU SAY.

            You are part of the system, part of the lies and deception.

          • canardnoir

            Needed and well put.

            Thanks!

          • David Jenest

            BRAVO Ignatzman – Political correctness is dumbing down America. We are a great coumtry where any one who works hard, is responsible for their own actions, and respects others can succeed in life no matter their race, politics or faith.

            Sgt. Sean Murphy should appear on the next cover of Rolling Stone as a hero! It about time to fight back. Inside if might be appropriate to put up a photo of the dead and mangled bodies of Tsarnaev’s VICTIMS. Oh wait, the media and the ACLU would have a fit over that. Better to bash a cop than a killer!

          • Antonia Ydal

            As are u no doubt a piece of human debris

          • ignatzman

            You obviously have a highly developed mind.What a brilliant and well thought out response!

          • Victor

            nice to know you ‘believe’ that based on the crap you have been fed by the media. forest for the trees attorney… .forest for the trees.

            Wake up.

          • CSI America

            Remind me never to have you represent me.

          • croyco

            Remind me to NEVER allow you to represent me.

          • ignatzman

            Since you are too ignorant to understand the difference between the first amendment and the protections afforded accused individuals in our legal system , I seriously doubt that you could afford me.

          • Nick099

            Yep….true. But I bet it will be kinda hard to prove innocence with images of this young fellow escaping in a vehicle running over his brother’s body in the process. You know the body with the gun in his hand after shooting a cop????

          • Dave

            The difference is like the black community in the Zimmerman case, the decision was made before he ever had his day in court. For Tsarnev it was innocent no matter what for Zimmerman, guilty no matter what.

          • disqus_CuhrLDpPHQ

            Guilty until proven innocent comes to my mind.

          • pbob67

            so how did that one work for Zimmerman?

          • jill815

            did you apply the same thinking to the zimmerman case?

          • Joseph Boyd

            Actually, yes. According to the local laws regarding stand-your-ground, Zimmerman was innocent of 2nd degree murder.

            He still killed a guy, he was still in the wrong, but he is innocent of the charges brought against him. I agree with the court’s decision, even while I disagree with the law.

            Fortunately for all of us, he still has to live with the social stigma and guilt…

            Back to the topic on hand, our government has subverted the right to a fair trial and obscured the facts. I assume Tsarnaev is innocent until both a preponderance of evidence has been brought against him, and he has had a chance for a publicly available rebuttal.

          • guest173

            Would you like this murderer to babysit your kids while he awaits his conviction?

          • iloveumore

            You know he did admit to this right?

          • BoDogit3

            right he admitted it with a hole in his neck that he couldn’t speak through….

          • Amy Amrap

            This is a forum, not a court of law.

          • Osamas Pajamas

            Of course, but “innocent until proven guilty in a court of law” is a legal concept that has no control on the right of the public to publicly argue and advance their views of guilt or innocence — and no one is obliged to wait for a jury to tell them what to think and say. Rolling Stone may think that Tsarnaev is a cutie. I don’t and I won’t.

          • Marrkedman

            You know what, when millions of Americans can see current images of these slime balls in the act of shooting it out with police – I would think that would constitute beyond reasonable doubt.

          • Munitor

            People like me is the reason why there would not be the need of any police. Believe me. And if HERE we can make assumptions about people; lesser if police is gonna be made out of people like you. If you are police you would need to be real useful in such case, maybe that’s why you think you are thankful now.

          • JonaD

            Every criminal believes he is justified.

          • Laurie Davis

            So does every tyrannical leader.

          • Nick099

            Yes…there are soooo many innocent men sentenced to jail….just ask them.

          • Nick099

            1) Learn English.
            2) Learn how to write.
            3) Seek medical attention.

          • Lewis Smith

            Aren’t we supposed to be innocent until proven guilty?

          • JonaD

            No. That’s a fantasy.

          • Bruce Boelter

            When there are pictures of you placing the bomb, you are proven guilty.

          • Helluva3ngineer

            Could you please forward a copy of those to me in email?

          • Steve

            Or the guy who owns the boat who said he saw a ton of blood in the boat before calling the police…

          • Nick099

            “a ton” ….that a lot of blood isn’t it???

          • Nick099

            Imbecile.

          • Unknown1776

            please, not our fault you apparently were not paying attention to the situation in Boston at the time. There’s more than enough evidence given the events of those days to prove he is guilty. It sounds to me like too many people here are copies of his mother:

            delusional with the inability to accept the young man’s demise.

          • brownie107

            Besides the fact that they threw the extra pressure cookers out on the streets of Watertown, h
            ow about focusing on the kid that they hijacked, drove around and was told by the brothers that they just shot a cop…..HELLO!!!

          • Unknown1776

            agreed

          • Ed_Kel

            He still gets his day in court. The jurors WILL find him guilty, but until then we cannot forget our core American values and find him guilty before his day in court.

          • ron

            ed_kel
            I don’t think this ever sees the inside of a courtroom. With all the charges they will take the death penalty off the table and sentence him to life in prison.

          • Steve

            No we are not- The Jury needs to do that. We can believe whatever we want

          • CDODGE2

            EXACTLY!!!!

          • estragon

            yes, that’s the way it is supposed to work. i think what you are seeing here is the breaking down of what used to be a civil society.

            when ordinary citizens are so torqued that they refer to fundamental governing principles as “fantasy,” then we’re all in trouble.

            if this sort of thing were just a one off, then i think we could dismiss it, but i’m afraid is is rampant in the u.s. today.

          • Nick099

            Grow up. If you don’t know what happened in Boston…or read about it….well that explains your idiotic comment.

          • RUKIDDING

            A show of hands please. Who actually believes he is innocent?

          • DronePro

            Sadly, Munitor’s rants are true. We are not the only country to adhere to “innocent until proven guilty” however we are one of few to empower police officers with deadly power. We pride ourselves on how great we are with our liberties and the wonderful laws we have that protect, truly petty criminals. If we are to be truthful we ourselves as a society we have to understand that we have no laws for “alleged” mar murderers and people of this nature. If they are caught alive we resort to a mediocre law system however dead is better.

            We have forgotten that fight or flight is the human nature of not just humans but all living things. No one here is says this kid is innocent of anything but as a mass, we immediately sucked into what was told to us by the media, and what the media was told to say. We, not as Americans, but as humans, hardly can say we have much individuality left when it comes to assessing things for ourselves and not buying into what we are sold on a colorful screen.

            The strength to reserve judgment even in the most heinous of cases until all evidences are exhausted is stronger than one’s will to blindly give their lives for something they blindly believe to be true.

          • Karen Mader

            I don’t believe that Tsarnaev’s innocence or guilt is the question here. That is for the courts to sort out. Of course, the rest of us know unequivocably that he’s guilty. The issue is with Rolling Stone glamorizing terrorists, and giving them the media attention that they crave. The only question left is: how do we go about supporting Sergeant Sean Murphy for being brave enough to share the pictures we should have seen a long time ago?

          • BowMtnSpirit

            Speak for yourself: I don’t know him to be guilty, and neither do you. And Sean Murphy got the support currently provided in our system for providing factual information the government wants to keep secret: he got fired. Unfortunately, he didn’t do what he did for the same altruistic reasons as did William Binney, Thomas Drake, John Kiriakou and Ed Snowden. He did it out of police-state-mentality rage that the “criminal” he hates was depicted as looking human. You have that same bias.

          • Cowboydroid

            The presumption of innocence is the FOUNDATION of our legal system.

            It is tragic that a rabid hoard of internet commenters disagree. But then, that is why we live in a Republic, and not a democracy.

          • Griffin

            @TheDeuce
            Interessting that people with your thoughts are still able to live free in the 20th Century. You should be kicked back into stone age.

          • DD4D

            Do you have an argument? I missed it in the ranting.

          • Guest

            How do you know that I’m not in a position of leadership and power?

          • Sakeeta Rosen

            There has not been one bit of evidence shown that he did it. Proof that he DIDNT do it, is the fact the cops wont show any photos of their “evidence”. Its was all a faked event, planned out by the law enforcement themselves. We do NOT need police, they are corrupt and here to destroy us.

          • juststacey

            Just stop now. No sane person could possibly take you seriously.

            If you actually believe this stuff that you’re spewing then you are a danger to yourself and others and should be heavily medicated in a psychiatric institution.

          • David Jenest

            Unfortunately TheDeuce our nation does have people like Munitor in positions of leadership and power. Look no further than DOJ and IRS. Toss in the ACLU for dessert.

          • agglebert

            let me ask you a question. if you REALLY killed a bunch of people with a bomb at a public event would you stay in the area going to school, partying with friends on and off campus or would you get out??? WAKE UP!

          • Victor

            The duece…. are you serious? “assumption he is innocent’….!!!!
            HELLO !!! This is America…. we are presumed innocent UNTIL PROVEN guilty.

            You are a very dangerous person. You are the type of person that allows tyranny to thrive.

        • Tony Wood

          As for what connects him to the attack; you mean besides the bloody note he wrote inside the boat before getting caught admitting to conducting the attack? They should have let him bleed to death..

          • Munitor

            I’ve said not to be ingenuous. “A bloodie note saying …” Do you think such note mid its circumstances is a proof of guilt. Seriously.

          • bostonmeg

            Were you there that day? Did you see the after effects of the bombing personally? Did you know that they shot MIT Officer Sean Collier for ‘no reason’ and asked the BU Grad Student if his car could go to NY? Then then two brothers proceeded to shoot it out with many, many police officers in Watertown, terrorizing an entire neighborhood, almost killing Officer Dic Donahue? Seriously you come here and ask what makes him guilty – other than his actions? Nothing but he will have his day in court where he can tell his side of the story. He doesn’t need to be glamorized on the cover of the Rolling Stone or hailed as a hero so some other misguided, unhappy young person can find their way to fame by killing innocent adults & children.

          • Mark Daniels

            i’m a misguided, unhappy, young person look for a way to fame. are you saying that killing people is the way to do it?

          • bgdogboden

            treating others as you would want to be treated makes you famous, sir

          • JonaD

            Yes, that is a way, which is why we as a society should not promote it, if we as a society do not want copycats.

          • Lars C.

            The fact is that the society promotes it – want it or not.
            If you want to licence all the killings in the country to the state privilege only, then go on and demand the press shut up and change the laws.

            But as far as I’ve seen, it doesn’t work either.

          • JonaD

            Well yes, society promotes it and that is a fact… but it’s not what we should be doing.

            I do want to limit all killings to those that are tried in court, but that would be utterly unreasonable and frankly, impossible, so instead I proclaim openly and in public…

            “QUIT PROMOTING KILLING as a PUBLIC ENTITLEMENT of your FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION, the CONSTITUTION was not designed to sanctify PEOPLE as equivalent to PARCHMENT! for YOU to write on!”

            … ok, thanks.

          • Nick099

            According to RS and many of the twerps here…yes.

          • bostonmeg

            I am saying that this could be interpreted as your way to fame. I am not advocating you do this as I was standing there when the bombs went off and saw the death/destruction.

          • http://twitter.com/GailC14 Gail Calhoun

            Here is a reader, bostonmeg-claiming the Tsarnaevs are the shooters who shot officer Donahue. Aren’t sheeple wonderful. Why have facts in the news at all? Bostonmeg doesn’t need any. Just let them froth at the mouth at who the FBI guided media points the finger at, that’s all they need. And there are a lot of bostonmegs out there.

          • Mark Daniels

            Yea. Shut up Meg.

          • JonaD

            FBI guided media?.. hehe PARANOID DELUSION.

          • truthsquad

            Yes, FBI Guided. Like at the Boston news conference where the FBI told the media to not look at any photographs except the ones they were showing. Don’t look at the photos that show other suspects with backpacks that actually matched, unlike Tsarnaev’s.

            You also do realize the FBI was involved in the ’93 World Trade Center bombing and provided the explosive materials? Had it not been for whistle blower Emad Salem, they would be lying about it to this day. Don’t believe me, look it up. Wake up sheeple.

          • http://www.miketheinfidel.com/ MikeTheInfidel

            “Like at the Boston news conference where the FBI told the media to not look at any photographs except the ones they were showing. Don’t look at the photos that show other suspects with backpacks that actually matched, unlike Tsarnaev’s.”

            Because they had eliminated the other people as suspects. Focusing on those people is called WITCH HUNTING, not helping.

          • truthsquad

            If those were the only two suspects, why did the FBI blast their unarmed friend Ibragim Todashev weeks later?

            Look, I don’t like believing this stuff. I wish I could go back asleep… but no one is whipping slow cooker bombs during a gun fight with heavily armed police. I’ve also never heard crazed terrorists yelling “We didn’t do it” So many problems with this whole story.

            Secure in Place, AKA. Martial Law enforced on an entire metropolis? Ripping people from their homes in robes and training “assault rifles” (their term) on innocent people and even children. Violating peoples rights to capture terrorists who hate our freedoms, to save our freedoms? This logic is seriously flawed.

            Trust me, I love this country and I want it back.

          • runnerbp

            The country you want to live in has the Tsarnev brothers wandering around blowing people like you to smithereens. Idealism becomes ridiculous when taken to it’s literal extremes.

          • truthsquad

            The country I want to live in follows the rights guaranteed by over a million dead patriots protecting the constitution and the true American way of life. The country I want to live has protections against illegal search and seizure as well as the rule of posse comitatus which outlaws a standing army in use against its citizens. Oh wait, that is where I live…. or used to.

            Is it a conspiracy theory to say that the FBI has admitted to controlling Tamerlan Tsarnaev for up to 5 years before the bombing? That doesn’t strike you as odd? I suppose he never picked up a phone, sent an email, text… Otherwise, clearly the NSA would have picked up on this plan. The sole purpose of that program is to stop terrorists, so I can only assume this is the case. (sarcasm)

          • Unknown1776

            I don’t know. Seems pretty logical to ensure those who are primary suspects get the well-deserved attention they need in order to be apprehended, but you know, then that would be LOGIC, and boy would the world stop…

          • runnerbp

            There seems to be some sort of genetic disorder that makes people believe wild irrational conspiracies. The sheeple are the wild conspiracy mongers who only love imaginary information. The real stuff freaks them out.

          • truthsquad

            Thomas Jefferson must have had the greatest genetic disorder of all…

            “When the people fear the government there is tyranny, when the government fears the people there is liberty.”

          • JonaD

            Yeah, I’ve read his ‘slant’ and his attempts to extort further money from the FBI than was negotiated for, for his role as an informant. I heard the soundtrack and read the transcript and do not come to the same conclusion as you obviously did. SO again… paranoid delusion.

          • CDODGE2

            Gail Calhoun, every time you comment on a page of some sort, you sound like an absolute idiot. You have a lot of nerve attacking bostonmeg when you can’t even spell “people.” This wasn’t a conspiracy so take a break from crazy town.

          • Bradford

            …it’s spelled SHEEPLE…, and you’re ONE of THEM, “CDODGE2″…
            …google: “Craft International”, look at the “images” results, THAN tell us what you THINK, not what your knee-jerk emotional reaction is…

          • CDODGE2

            Support some more terrorist attacks Bradford.

          • Bradford

            …like the one in West, Texas, on Weds., April 17, when a HUGE FIREBALL exploded an unregulated fertilizer plant, and *15* people were killed, including *10* firefighters?…That’s over *5*TIMES the death toll of the Boston Marathon Firecrackers…you mean “terrorist attacks” like THAT…???…
            …baaaaah, baaaah, baaaah, dude….

          • Lars C.

            It surely creates terror, having that massive amount of explosive stuff situated in the middle of a village. Like in Texas West. Having only few hundred meters to senior houses, schools, kindergarten, people homes.

            There you talk only about the deaths, but Texas West fertilizer plant blast injured hundreds of people.

            That’s terrorism justified by authorities, money and even the people themselves! But it’s so hard to see, do you see.

          • CDODGE2

            So, I am confused… Are you saying the plant explosion was a terrorist attack? Because I was talking about the Boston Marathon Attacks, Rolling Stone, and the Tsarnaev brothers…

          • Bradford

            No, I’m NOT saying the West, Tx. explosion was a “terrorist” attack, only pointing out how LITTLE media coverage it has gotten, compared to Boston, especially as Boston had such a relatively small casualty count…and, how HYPED-UP in the media Boston is…and, WHERE is the follow-up media coverage from the OTHER alleged co-conspirator to Boston, who was shot & killed by the FBI in Fla…???…We don’t know what the TRUTH is, because the media LIES to us…THAT is what I’m saying…

          • CDODGE2

            Great… Another conspiracy theorist… Give it a rest… Have a great day

          • Bradford

            …the entire main-stream-media story of the Boston Marathon Firecrackers is a “conspiracy theory”, in itself….The Tsarnaev Bros. are being set up as patsies, and dupes…Look at the Whitey Bulger/Steve Flemmi CRIME-CIRCUS trial going on in Boston right now…HOW MANY crooked & corrupt FBI agents have we seen there…???…How many crooked & corrupt cops…???…How many *CRIMINALS*…???…

          • CDODGE2

            And it is because of people like you that are infuriated about this magazine cover… Your response to the marathon bombings is “firecrackers?” Two women and an 8 year old boy lost their lives and hundreds more lost limbs. There is no comparison. The people in Texas were in Boston’s thoughts ESPECIALLY. How dare you try to twist that around. Shame on you Bradford.

          • Bradford

            Sorry, CDODGE2, but I am NOT bothered at all about the Rolling Stone cover…RS will sell TONS of this issue…and, no, I do NOT believe that “hundreds more lost limbs”…they are NOT in any photos that I can find, anywhere…Considering how much “conspiracy” crap is out there, it would be easy for the media to refute the “conspiracy nuts”…but the media isn’t doing that. WHY?….maybe it really *IS* more “conspiracy” than not…

          • Lars C.

            Don’t you know every time you say “I hate muslims” another American hater is born?

            You ignorant fool.

          • CDODGE2

            I NEVER said “I hate Muslims”… People have no problem calling people names in this forum but I’m not allowed to say what he called himself in his original post? I would love to hear the explanation for that…

          • CDODGE2

            I NEVER said I hate Muslims…

          • Unknown1776

            then*. How are there this many people out there who refuse to believe the events that transpired in Boston? There is more than enough media coverage out there looking at every single angle throughout the whole situation to more than prove the point…

          • Bradford

            OK, it’s a typo….so sue me…what’s your point…???…my point is that we have all been lied to and manipulated about what REALLY happened in Boston, for lots of reasons, and the media is hyping this whole thing up…There will NEVER be a Rolling Stone cover about the West, TX fertilizer plant explosion, even though there were 5 times the fatalities, and they were mostly first responders…

          • Lama

            I lived at 4 Franklin st. Right down the street. Don’t tell me this was all made up, you @-hole! You can take your conspiracy theory and shove it.

          • Bradford

            …it’s not “my” “conspiracy theory”, Lama…
            I’m sorry for what you went through, but that still doesn’t mean you know the *TRUTH*…Sure, there were some low-level pyrotechnics in Boston, and some injuries, *BUT*, sorry, honey, NONE of the photos show the number and severity of injuries that were reported…and, considering all the photogs&photos, where is the EVIDENCE…???…All those people lost body parts, but NOBODY got a photo of a body part…???…that’s just for starters…All I’m saying is the whole thing stinks, and it doesn’t stink muslim…Look how many sheeple thought the Tsarnaevs were from Czechoslovakia…!…
            The Tsarnaevs were being watched by the FBI for YEARS, right?…so, how’d they get away with it…???…Lama the SHEEPLE…

          • Casey

            Dude, my co-worker ran the marathon and very much assured me that there was plenty of blood and flesh. Limbs typically don’t fall off intact making for good photographic evidence. I’m also lucky enough to know a cop that was both involved in the gun fight and at the boat and she told me that it was 10 times worse then anything we saw on TV. These terrorists had some serious weapons.

          • Bradford

            My friend works for the CIA, and he told me the whole thing’s a hoax…My other friend is in the Army, and he said it was all about doing a Martial Law drill…
            …touche, dude…

          • Lama

            First off, don’t call me “honey”. You don’t

            know me and, cuz if you did I’d already have smacked the crap out of you for peddling this BS. Secondly, you’re propagating it, then its yours. Body parts from those bombs could easily have been vaporized. You refer to the initial reactions that people thought they were Czech as an example of conspiracy, that was discredited and most informed people know if to be false. Facts emerge over the course of an investigation. There was a HS runner and his coach that were ID’s by the NY POST as “Bag Men” on their cover.
            You’re too clever by half with the obfuscation and misdirections.

          • Bradford

            “…Body parts…easily have been vaporized…”…I call bullsit on THAT…I’ve seen enough REAL explosions from Syria, Iraq, etc…& my referring to the “Czech” thing was an example of mis-&dis-information & confusion, NOT “conspiracy”…
            &Thanks for admitting that I’m “too clever by half”, HONEY…lol…(…and you got the nerve to call yourself “Lama”…???…HAH!, *HONEY*…)…
            Sorry, dude, we Independents don’t intimidate easily…

          • Lama

            You’ve seen them, like you’ve been there? In Syria and Iraq? Or you’ve seen it on the news?

            At this point, bringing up the Czech thing is nothing but misdirection. It was debunked within hours of his capture.

            Obviously, you don’t understand the phrase “too clever by half”. Its NOT a compliment. Nor is DUMBASS. Both fit.

            You’re an internet tough guy. Come to Boston and openly speak this BS. My guess is you’ll vaporize as quickly as those body parts you’re looking for. If you do come, let me know. I’ll be happy to meet you and I’ll show you just how Zen I can be once I’m done with you.

            Speaking of body parts, you are one, a DICK!

          • Bradford

            …ask yourself why you are so angry and upset by all this…and why you’re so scared…I think really, you’re ashamed because you just rolled over and let the FedGov do a MARTIAL LAW DRILL in Boston, and you’re not so comfortable being a sheeple, are you…???…Birth is often a painful process, Lama, so keep pushing…

          • Lama

            Answer my question. You’ve seen real explosions yourself or you’ve seen them on TV? If tv. Go away.

            I’m so angry because people were injured and killed. I’m a runner and feel a kinship with those who were there in the race. I’ve lived in Boston and feel a kinship with the people of the city. I’ve been to the marathon several times. Its my city! Its my commonwealth! Its my people!
            As I said before, you’re an internet tough guy that doesn’t have the balls to actually speak his mind in an arena that doesn’t involve anonymity. Grow up and grow a pair. The adults are done with you. Go home. I shan’t respond, nor shall I read any further posts by you, since you’re a turd in the punch bowl.

          • Bradford

            …I still think you’re too emotional to think straight…
            “…turd in the punch bowl”, yeah, that’s a VERY MATURE comment…
            “…grow a pair”…, yeah that’s real mature, too, and SO original…
            BAAAAH, BAAAH, BAAAAH go the SHEEPLE….

          • juststacey

            “NONE of the photos show the number and severity of injuries that were reported”

            I’m going to try to stay calm here, but I’m having a very hard time. No photos show the number and severity of the injuries?! I’m having to stop and collect my thoughts at this blatantly stupid comment. The photos were so graphic and horrifying that the news outlets had to post warning on them. There was a video shot by a reporter seconds after the explosion showing people laying in pools of their own blood while police and spectators were desperately dragging down the barriers to get to them.

            No photos?! Making a statement so completely WRONG and stupid is literally making my head hurt.

            How about these photos? Did they show the severity of the injuries for you?

          • juststacey

            Just do a search on any search engine then click Images. As if you didn’t already know that. What the EFF are you try to prove with this crap?

          • Bradford

            …yeah, Stacy, I’ve seen those photos…Arredondo&Bauman are 2 EXCELLENT ACTORS…the guy(Bauman) who SUPPOSEDLY got his “legs blown off” BTK, in fact lost them ATK in Iraq…and, like I said, Arredondo is an excellent actor…I was fooled at first, too, Stacy, but as I calmed down, got UN-emotional, and analytical, these photos no longer pass the “smell test”…they are all *STAGED*, Hollywood-style…
            If YOU had just had YOUR legs blown off, would YOU be AWAKE, ALERT, and CALM…???…and the “bombs” were Hollywood pyrotechnics, nothing more…lots of smoke, and a loud bang, but NO, I do NOT see “hundreds” of LEGITIMATE, REAL injuries…google:”Craft International”, and spend some time looking at the “images” results…
            Sorry, Stacy, these are all *FAKED* photos…
            Show me something REAL, and I might believe it…

          • juststacey

            Once again I am struggling to control my RAGE as I type this.

            If you truly believe that the Boston Marathon terrorist attack was staged and that the victims were all actors, then quite frankly you are either one of the stupidest people alive or you are completely insane.

            My gut instinct was to not even dignify this outrageous, cruel and entirely false crap with a reply but I must.

            You must have been born and raised in some kind of secluded militia compound out in the wilds of Montana or something, and have never set foot outside of it and seen real life in a big city or even a small town. What you are suggesting is 100% COMPLETELY IMPOSSIBLE!

            I have lived my entire life here in Boston and have spent quite a lot of time in the exact area where the bombings took place. I have patronized the candy shop that was blown to hell because they are the only shop in town where I can find plum Jelly Bellys. I know that area like the back of my hand.

            The Boston Marathon is an international sporting event that is broadcast LIVE both locally and beyond! The area where the finish line is located is a HIGH TRAFFIC area 24 hours a day! It is the center point of public transportation in that area with a subway stop and about a dozen bus routes originating and terminating exactly there. The central hub of the entire Boston Public Library is there. There are numerous hotels and a huge shopping mall steps away from the finish line itself. The streets are lined with major retailers. It is surrounded by corporate business, banks, restaurants, etc.

            Copley Sq NEVER closes! There is ALWAYS pedestrian and automobile traffic in the area. Even while they are setting up the staging and barriers it remains open to traffic except when they section off areas where they are erecting structures that could cause injury to passers-by and when they block the street to paint the finish line itself – and obviously they block the route of the race the night before. But there are ALWAYS people walking around before, during and after the set up and breakdown.

            it would would therefore be ABSOLUTELY IMPOSSIBLE to stage a fake attack with actors and Hollywood-esque special effects, you complete and utter MORON!!!! HOW COULD THEY POSSIBLY SET UP AND PERPETRATE ALL THAT IN FULL VIEW OF THE GENERAL PUBLIC?! There are THOUSANDS of people around the finish line alone along with news media broadcasting LIVE! For fucks sake there were live videos broadcasting at the exact moment the bombs went off! There were people with all their limbs intact standing and cheering the runners and then in a fraction of a second there were mangled bodies strewn all over the place with blood everywhere.

            Even Hollywood couldn’t accomplish that in a split second! IT ALL HAPPENED RIGHT IN FRONT OF OUR OWN EYES! Or you think they ENTER city was in on it? Or that the general public was refused entry to the area to make sure no one saw the elaborate hoax being performed like some sort of physics-defying magic trick?! HOW STUPID COULD YOU POSSIBLY BE?!

            First you say there were NO photos, which is obviously a flat out lie and mind-numbingly stupid, but I posted those same photos that were plastered all over media outlets WORLDWIDE anyway. Then you say, “these are all *FAKED* photos”. Ooooooooh!!! You wanted REAL photos!!! You just want it all don’t you?

            SERIOUSLY?! I mean it! SERIOUSLY?! You obviously have no idea just how STUPID and/or INSANE that is. Let me amend my previous opinion of you. You are either one of the stupidest and/or insane people alive or you are pure evil and enjoy pissing people off and rubbing salt in gaping wounds that will never ever heal. Either way, you contribute absolutely nothing to this world and you are a waste of a life.

            Oh, and, in response to your pointless question about if I’d just had my legs blown off: I’d probably be overwhelmed with massive amounts of adrenalin and in shock. That’s what the body does in extremely traumatic situations. Anyone with half a brain knows that.

            Oh yeah, and obviously you can’t read very well either, which would explain a lot, because if you could you’d see that my name is STACEY and not Stacy as you typed three times.

          • Bradford

            You’re correct – I inadvertently & mistakenly misspelled your name 3 times, even after I checked….
            And thanks for proving my point…You say you are “struggling to control your RAGE”…nobody can think clearly when they are enraged, Stacey…That’s what TPTB are counting on…That you continue to believe everything they tell you. You’re a good little sheeple, Stacey. Now, go back to sleep…enjoy your dreams…Maybe after you wake up you can tell me something about Arredondo&Bauman…

          • juststacey

            Way to dodge everything in my reply to you which proves that your asinine allegations are completely impossible.

            Physics? What’s that? Science? An inconvenient bit of trivia.

          • Bradford

            Sorry, Stacey, but I “dodged” nothing…you made no specific claims…all I read in your reply was angry, over-emotional ranting and raving…Why don’t YOU tell ME something relevant about either Arredondo, or Bauman, or don’t you know who they are…???…My points are that you don’t even know a fraction of what you *THINK* you “know”….you’re still too angry & scared…
            …did you google Craft Int’l, yet…???…WELL…???…

          • juststacey

            Here, I found another fake photo for you, asshole.

            http://i.imgur.com/tQ6JdDs.jpg

          • Bradford

            …it sure looks just like a FAKE photo…
            …thnx, Stacey…

          • juststacey

            Here’s a crazy idea. Why don’t YOU provide irrefutable proof that this was all staged and that the victims were “crisis actors”. You know what irrefutable proof is, right? It’s verifiable facts provided by a reputable and identified source.

            Oh, and just so you know, blogs from Neo-Natzis shrieking about the evil “Xionist Jews” and ultra-right extremists aren’t reputable sources.

            Yeah, I didn’t think so. (And do you REALLY want to be associated with the aforementioned bloggers?)

          • Bradford

            National Socialist German Workers’ Party, aka NSDAP, aks “Nazis”…& it’s spelled “zionist”…
            …what are you gonna do next year in *high*school*, girl…???…

          • juststacey

            What’s aks? Ohhh you mean aka again. Whoopsie. And… by… the… way… Please… learn… how… to… use… ellipses…

            Lucky you. You caught two typos that I made. Yay you!

            So the fascists ARE your friends then. Explains a lot actually. And the Holocaust never happened either right? Or was that staged by the same ZIONIST Jews and crisis actors?

            And you did it again. You conveniently ignored MY points about the how staging the Boston Marathon bombing would be physically impossible and failed to provide ONE credible source to back up your preposterous and hateful lies.

            You make me sick.

          • Bradford

            …YO!, Stacey, why should I “learn… how… to… use ellipses…”, just because YOU tell me to…???…I have my own style of ellipsesisms…
            And, actually, Stacey, it was very easy to “stage” the whole Boston Marathon Firecrackers episode… Did you google “Craft International”, yet…???…Craft was the main civilian contractor, along with FedGov assets from DHS, FBI, etc…
            Bauman lost both his legs just below the hip in Iraq(…IED explosion…) and was then fitted with the gory-looking prosthesis with the fake bone sticking out…a SECOND, normal-looking prosthesis was fitted over THAT…so, when the firecrackers were lit, and distracted everybody, the outer prosthesis was removed, revealing the gory-looking one…Arrendondo was pre-positioned, w/wheelchair, and so was the photog…VOILA!…a whole series of gruesome photos SPLASHED all over the media, for low-information voters just like YOU, Stacey…
            THAT is how it was done…And, you keep insisting on “irrefutable proof”, but there’s no such thing…You have already had your mind made up for you, and you will never change it without permission, will you? See, that’s what makes you a good little sheeple…
            (…BTW, I am NOT a Holocaust denier, or a “fascist”…I’m a WASP, and your Pope Francis tells you to love me, because I’m poor…*grin*…and Stacey, you’d be happier if you weren’t so gullible, didn’t get so easily upset, and used your brain more for something besides being in a *RAGE*…

          • juststacey

            You’re an idiot. Period.

            The victims were real people. Martin Richard was a real person. He was a beautiful little boy. My family has a personal connection to his family. My sister’s nephew went to school with him and was friends with him. I just so happened to drive by his street on the day of his funeral and there was a police detail outside of the Richard’s house making sure no one harassed the grief stricken family on the day that they buried their eight year old child. It was so very, very sad. How dare you mock the death of a young, sweet, innocent child? WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU?!

            Jeff Bauman is not Nick Vogt. Craft are mercenaries. So what? They are the conspiracy nut’s go to scapegoat whenever ever anything like this happens. That act got tired a long time ago.

            What is wrong with you? Seriously! I can’t imagine what could have happened in your life to make you so hateful and paranoid. I just cannot fathom what would make someone so cold and mean-spirited. Get a life you sad, sick, pathetic, uneducated, little man. Stop seeing conspiracies where there are none. I’m gullible? No, I’m not. YOU’RE the gullible one, believing that absurdly impossible story made up by who the hell knows what evil bastard, for who the hell knows what evil reason. Every single detail of that ludicrous theory is totally implausible on its own. Then put them all together and ABSOLUTELY NO sane, rational person could possible take it seriously.

            The attack on the Marathon was REAL. Thousand of people saw it happen with their own eyes, right in front of them. The Tsarnaev’s did it. They were caught red handed. End of story.

          • juststacey

            I don’t have a Pope, moron. I don’t let hypocrite would-be emperors dictate what I can and cannot believe and do.

          • Bradford

            I would rather be a “moron”, than to be a LESS-on, like YOU…but, you could use a good LESSON, or 2…I LOVE how you totally IGNORE every relevant comment I make, and focus on my harmless personal insults…Have you read “sniperkitty’s” blog yet? It’s well-written, and has lots of links…Look at all the “honest” FBI agents in the Whitey Bulger trial…I believe that the world is MUCH SAFER than “they” want you to think…

          • juststacey

            I’m sorry, did you make a relevant comment somewhere? I haven’t seen one.

          • Lilee

            I very much agree with this. Remember at first they tied the convenience store robbery with the MIT cop killing, saying it was the bombers that robbed the store. But later video showed the bombers did not rob the store. We would still believe they had if there was no video. So what ties the bombers to the MIT cop killing? Boston/Watertown had a military takeover, make no mistake. That is rationalized by making this a terrorist attack with a capital T. So will someone get away with killing a cop to fulfill an image they need of the brothers to justify the military takeover of Boston? Was what happened in Boston really a thrill killing orchestrated by the older brother, using lame politics as an excuse and dragging the younger one in? But that image doesn’t justify a coup over our normal police proceedings. So they need to make him bigger than life, not some kid on the cover of the Rolling Stone.

          • Unknown1776

            I imagine you must be from the South, or a State with a libertarian streak.

          • Unknown1776

            the burden of proof is on those who would say he’s not involved in any of the aforementioned incidents given the vast media coverage on this subject as it took place. So if all you sheeple who purportedly know all and see through all the conspiracies out there are so correct, why not start illustrating to us minute-by-minute the events that transpired in Boston, with substantiated evidence to prove he was not there? Because there is a very large section of people out there that watched this news from Day 1, following the breadcrumbs as others have. So please, elucidate us.

          • juststacey

            You and your fellow conspiracy fuckwits are the sheeple. You are believing a bunch of pure crap that is physically impossible. But don’t let that dissuade you. Some people just can’t handle reality.

          • juststacey

            Where is all this irrefutable proof that you conspiracy SHEEPLE keep ranting about? I’ve looked for it but all I can find are blogs by ultra-conservatives, Neo-Nazis blaming the “hoax” on “Xionist Jews”, and the like. I couldn’t find ANYTHING even closely resembling cold, hard facts – NOTHING AT ALL. Please post links to any source that presents legitimate proof from verifiable sources – if you have any…

            You and everyone saying this was a staged event with “crisis actors” are fools if you actually believe it and evil sociopaths if you don’t and just like to get people riled up for your own amusement.

          • Munitor

            I only know what Police says, what Family and Friends says and what people that knew him says. Google > Tsarnaev facts <. Tsarnaev has no relation with this tragedy but just because Police and Media says so.

            Police have no more suspects but only them due a video where they are spotted just walking. But if you were there maybe you may enlight more about.

          • JonaD

            Yeah? Oh, and you CHOOSE to believe them, with no proof, but scoff those who believe another perspective, who have proof. Now, as scum, you must say, “What proof? Maybe the ‘proof is faked!?” and so forth… right? Loser.

          • alexdifeo

            Listen, I like a good government conspiracy more than most, just read my posts, but I think you’re reaching on this one….I think he’s just an impressionable kid that got caught up in his brother’s murderous lunacy…

          • Karen White

            Actually a survivor of the bombing, who lost both legs in the attack, identified the Tsarnaev brothers. He gave first responders their descriptions and described Tamerlin placing the back pack by his feet then walking away moments before the explosion. He lost both legs but not his mind, his will to live or the ability to see the facts in front of him. He was there! He was awake and able to provide details of the bombing suspects that were then proven with video of the suspects! Is he an FBI led steeple?
            No, he is just a man who can tell first hand what happened to him and who did it, because he was there, he suffered, still suffers! Many victims still suffer and will for years to come. The other victims? Let me remind you! They are still dead and their loss will impact their families forever. Lets reserve humanity for the humane, justice for the just and respect for the respectful! Glorifying evil perpetuates evil! Portraying this evil boy as a “good boy gone bad” is reprehensible and a slap in the face to the real victims of the heinous acts of two twisted, evil minds!

          • michele dodt

            How then would you explain the pressure cooker bomb they chucked at the pursuing
            officers? I know I don’t drive around with explosives and weapons in my car!!

          • Lars C.

            Meg, officer Donahue was shot by his own fellows. Friendly fire, they said.

            We all know the story, and this is not the judge. Relax, sista.

          • troutfishinggirl

            He means “what makes him guilty” like where is the
            proof. So far we have only seen a pic of what appears to be him standing near
            the finish line, pics of numerous WARRANTLESS searches happening all over the
            area to people who weren’t even close to being considered suspects, and pics of
            him getting out of the boat.

            Where are the pics from the gas station where the victim of
            the carjacking apparently escaped? Where is the pic of them even near the MIT
            campus? Where is the pic (out of the THOUSANDS and THOUSANDS of pics they had)
            of either of the brothers leaving a backpack that blew up? I have seen many
            photos with MANY people who had on black backpacks that day, and who later did
            not. Maybe it’s possible that they dropped their bags after the bomb went off,
            like HUNDREDS of other people near the finish line did (there are plenty of
            photos of all of the bags/purses/gear people dropped when running away, that
            they were trying to reunite with their owner). Where is the picture of inside
            of the apartment where these bombs were allegedly made? Where are the reliable
            eyewitnesses that aren’t employed by the government (ie law enforcement)?

            Really, where is any of this?

            And no, I’m not conspiracy theorist, I just like evidence before I lynch mob
            someone. I’m sure you would want people who acted the same, if you were in a
            situation of being accused of something. If you think everyone should believe
            everything the government is saying because the government is saying it, well I
            have news for you. Since the beginning of time almost every government has told
            some kind of lie, big or small. The only way to know it isn’t a lie is to have
            proof beyond what is being told to you by the person you think may be lying.

            Considering all the photos they had, and considering all of
            the eyewitnesses there SHOULD BE, and considering that we know how much data
            the NSA keeps on virtually everyone, they shouldn’t have a problem with
            producing evidence, yet they are not doing so. And dispersing evidence before
            trial would not make it inadmissible in court, so don’t even try to go there.
            There is virtually no reason why the government should not give us even a crumb
            of evidence that these brothers committed this crime. You can say they don’t
            want to “tip off other terrorists with the methods”, well they have
            verbally TOLD almost anyone who will listen what they allegedly SAW and what
            the brothers allegedly DID, so producing evidence on what has already been told
            to us would not give them anything new, it would merely confirm what they
            obviously want the American people to believe. And in all honesty, why would
            terrorists want to mimic these two, if what they are accused of is true? Terrorists’
            main objective is to kill as many people as possible and spread as much fear as
            possible. Only 3 people were killed in the Boston bombing. While that is 3 more
            than anyone wants to die, that is an extremely low number for something that
            was allegedly a “trained terrorist act”. Most trained terrorists are
            very sophisticated and meticulously plan things out. Whoever committed this
            bombing was obviously not very trained, because the methods they used did not
            cause casualties on a terrorist like scale. More people died in car
            accidents in America that day than died in the Boston bombing. Am I happy
            that people died/got injured in the bombing? Absolutely not. I’m
            just trying to illustrate why someone who even has a small knowledge of
            terrorists/terrorism would question why the government would think this act was
            committed by trained terrorists. That question leads to more questions.
            None of which can be answered absent of proof.

          • JonaD

            Yes. Definitely.

          • Unknown1776

            ummmm once someone acknowledges their crime without coercion its considered to be a legitimate confession, hate to tell you.

        • http://www.mohammedismail.com/ Mohammed Ismail

          You might find this interesting: “The Boston Bombings: A tale of drills, patsies and terrible, terrible geography” http://j.mp/15V2fJU

          • JonaD

            More fiction eh.?.. wait for the trial.

        • tigerpawraw

          Obviously, not all evidence has been presented yet. They even mentioned having video of the Tsarnevs dropping the bombs but did not want to broadcast those images because they feared what people might do to them if they found them before police. People like you kill me; you try to discredit everything by claiming a lack of evidence, but never present any real evidence to back your claims. And repeating what some crazy right wing website/talk radio guy has said does not constitute “real evidence”.

          • Bradford

            …google: “Craft International”, and see what comes up for “images”…

          • Prodius

            Right wing?
            The “right wing” has been warning people of radical Islam for ages.
            Alex Jones is a purveyor of intellectual smut, hardly right wing and more insane than most extremists from either side.

            EDIT: the word intellectual in the context used can be debated.

        • JonaD

          See? Insanity is the one major constant of humanity, and Munitor demonstrates this perfectly… tainted, corrupted, twisted, and using every bit of his imagination to make his fantasy of victimization come real. Dude, it’s easy, the guy is a terrorist, a bombing monster! and has no consideration for anyone, not even his brother… you admire him, and you admire DIRT!

        • Cecil

          If you’re going to espouse controversial views, it’s best to make sure your message is neither ranting or uses poor grammar, which at times forces the reader to re-read sections to try and figure out what you’re trying to say.

        • Tom

          You are an ignorant, dangerous fool, period. The ‘suspect’ was driven over by his own brother and dragged a hundred feet under their stolen car. Lol. But with your amazing English grammar, I imagine you are 12, or just another uneducated idiot leaching off society while trashing the country you live in. Just like the bombers.

        • EpicMale

          Who would have guessed the Taliban could post here from some dusty cave in Afghanistan?

        • EZE

          Your grammar is fucking unreadable. Don’t try to make a point if you can’t write english. I don’t even know whether I agree with you or not because I DON’T KNOW WHAT THE FUCK YOU ARE SAYING!

        • Tom

          So, let me get this straight…the FBI is involved with a bombing of hundreds of innocents at a marathon race so that We will be distracted from ‘what is really going on’ such as north Korea or computer surveillance.. You are such a complete conspiracy jackass that I cannot believe I wasted a minute replying.

          • Unknown1776

            especially since the surveillance issue came out months later 😉

        • Nick099

          Tin-foil hat time for you.

        • Sallynotadude

          You know I have been thinking about making up conspiracy theories to mess with people like you and I have a question. Is the terrible sentence structure and poor grammar that I see in so many crazy theories required? If I did it in an easy to read, proper manner, would you guys not be able to read it?

        • sam

          wtf are you talking about…

          (and how did over 100 people upvote that?!)

        • James

          I would say that him writing his ‘manifesto’ if you will in blood on the wall of the boat he was hiding in is evidence enough that he did it. Or maybe it was the explosive materials (the same that were used in the bombing) that were found in his backpacks at school, you know, the ones that his friends hid. That sounds like good evidence. Or maybe the fact that he was knowingly running from SWAT teams. Maybe the fact that his older brother literally said “We did that” in reference to the explosions to the man with the vehicle that they carjacked. That all sounds like evidence to me. Go educate yourself on the definition of ignorance.

        • donpjt

          Running and hiding is one thing that innocent people do, BUT, Innocent people don’t carry assault weapons and use them on cops when confronted.

          Innocent people are not ready to sacrifice their own brother while they are fleeing.

          The one who was killed in a police confrontation was not someone who was innocent, but someone who had already murdered a cop. They were ready to kill someone in order to save themselves. If that had not happened, this manhunt would not have become so aggressive!

          When you murder someone, who protects the people, the game changes, you will be hunted!

        • Chris

          Well Put Munitor – too bad there are too many ignorant people around here to follow what your saying – if you said this on CNN/FOX/CBS they would probably believe though

        • Griffin

          I agree with you

        • Nancy

          seriously? Him and his brother were shooting the cops while being chased. Police did their job. They knew who was responsible and that’s why they hunted him down like the animal he is!!!

        • timm

          Your written English even sounds like “bring me moose and squirrel.” And you ARE nuttier than squirrel turds. Wishing you everything bad.
          The World.

        • Griffin

          I agree with you

        • Ben Chen

          LOL! Munitor. The irony in your #2 and #6. What actual knowledge of this case do you have? Are you relying on what the media has not reported as evidence that there is no evidence linking Tsarnaev to the crime?

          #10 is really funny .

        • Andrew Green

          In reguards to point number two. maybe the fact that he had a shootout with police and even threw bombs (devices strikingly similar to the ones recovered on the attack site) at the officers.

        • Dave

          How many innocent people shoot and throw bombs at police officers?

        • LouAnnWatson

          you are definitely a sympathetic foreigner, i can tell by your speech patterns, whether you’re (actually) here legally or not. spread your propaganda elsewhere

        • Gary A

          He likely killed his brother when escaping by running him over.

        • ggm281

          You just did something that is almost impossible today. You made me grateful I was born in the US because at least it is not whatever country you came from. Living with such paranoia would be untenable.

          • ByTheWay

            So you believe that 19 men with box cutters were able to outwit the most powerful military in the world and had NORAD stand down. TSA was implemented sticking hands down peoples pants to keep us safe while radiation body scanners making profits for Michael Chertoff the out going head of HLS. A deal to put these in airports was made before 9/11. You honestly don’t think there is an agenda here? What is the motive? NSA spying on everything you do, mail, email, computer research, phone calls, texts messages, TSA, Street cameras, etc…..follow the money trail.

        • Suzanne Longo

          Oh shut-up and go back to your conspiracy theories websites.

        • djh

          Hey, if our president had had a son, he would have looked like Tsarnaev.

        • Sam

          Thank you. You have made my exact reasoning available to the public. I thank you. It is good to know that I am not the only one who thinks like this. There really are intelligent, logical thinkers in the world.

        • Richie Villafuerte

          nothing you claim is factual or can be substantiated. he has admitted to the crime already, not everything is a conspiracy.

        • Mickey

          Conspiracy theories are adorable!

        • Marrkedman

          What a masshole you are. Do you not read? Are you always so ill informed?

      • canardnoir

        “invented” and now they’re scrubbing the comments – go figure.

    • Barry Bond

      Trash should be kept in the garbage cans it belongs in

      • victoria8

        well said,short and to the point

    • Adam Steiger

      For the sake of clarity, I want to understand your position better.

      Are you taking a position of moral relativism here? That is, are you placing both bostonmagazine.com and Rolling Stone magazine into the same category (i.e. both are attempting to attract attention)?

      • Aaron K Kraus

        No, I’m saying that sensationalism has been, is now, and will be a component of photo-journalism insomuch as it is packaged for consumption at the newsstand. Magazines and publications are trying to select visually arresting images that communicate something deeper than the image to entice buyers.

        Boston Magazine decided to capitalize on the attention the RS cover generated and release a series of images to tell a story AND drive page views. Rolling Stone decided to draw attention to their story by selecting an image that would challenge the casual viewer AND drive sales.

        • Adam Steiger

          Thank you for clarifying, Aaron.

          When I was a communication major, the marketing strategies you mentioned were presented in mass media lecture on the basis of whether or not they were “newsworthy”.

          While I don’t agree Rolling Stone’s choice of presentation, I am aware (as you stated) of the reasons why.

        • Curious.

          Aaron Kraus – were you at the bombing? Were you or a loved one there?

          • brian_x

            I wasn’t at the bombing, though I could have been (the restaurant that got blown up is a place I hang out at quite a bit), and the town I grew up in was one of the towns put on lockdown during the manhunt. I still have family and friends in the area and I visit there regularly.

            And you know what? Aaron is quite correct.

          • Aaron K Kraus

            No, although I regularly visited and worked in Boston and had two close friends in the area that day. Just curious, why would it matter? If I had been there would I be entitled to censor the media’s use of images?

        • kenlaw

          Fat souless ginger homo get that nigger dick out your mouth

          • Aaron K Kraus

            Great point.

    • Serge Isaac Barou

      Aaron, you are just talking porkies. The magazine has nothing to do with the picture on its cover? And the wrong message it sends? Well, I just reiterate: you’re talking highly sophisticated porkies.

      • Aaron K Kraus

        I have no idea what you mean by “porkies,” let alone “talking” ones.

        • brian_x

          Just guessing, but sounds like rhyming slang: lies -> pork pies -> porkies

        • Serge Isaac Barou

          This is not the only thing you have no idea about, but it doesn’t stop you from blathering just the same

          Porky
          A big lie. From the English rhyming slang ‘porky pies’, which rhymes with lies.

          Axel: Did you hear that I was elected pope?
          Jeeves: Tha’ts a porky. Stop telling porkies.

          • Aaron K Kraus

            Ahh — of course — PORKIES. I’m not good with Cockney rhyming slang, how would I say “You’re missing the point of my comment but that doesn’t surprise me because you seem to be actively avoiding nuanced thinking.”?

    • Anjali

      I’m still trying to understand how this is a response to the Rolling Stone cover…it shows a wounded, unarmed terrorist almost dying when we needed answers from him. I guess that “shoot-out” must have been pretty intense given that he didn’t have a gun. These photos just remind me of our incompetence during this whole fiasco. We should seriously questioned what happened to this once normal kid to turn him into an alleged mass murderer, and how did he and his brother get away from the police SO MANY TIMES. If it wasn’t for the Asian man and the boat owner…we wouldn’t have gotten them. All while we continue spying on all Americans and escalating the arms of local police and state troops. But no, let the mindless glorification of the authorities, corrupt politicians, and trigger happy FBI continue.

      • Dan Flathers

        The authorities did their jobs. The bombers did theirs.
        Whom is “mindlessly glorifying” whom?

        • Anjali

          The people who consider this fiasco a success. That is who is mindlessly glorifying the authorities who did their job poorly.

          • brian_x

            And how would you have handled the whole situation?

      • Charles Bryan Baron

        Why does normal kid turn into mass murderer—-ask the Islamists among us and around the world. Why do arab terrorists exist? Why did Bin Laden exist for so long? The appeal of this extreme perverted skewed version of Islam to so many people rivals the appeal of the rabid inhuman organization known as the Nazional Sozialisitiche Deutsche Arbiter Partei (NSDAP–NAZIS)

        • Dan Flathers

          Still waiting for the Imams in America and CARE to get serious…

          • Anjali

            THEY ARE SERIOUS! No matter how many times they condemn these acts, its never enough. We hardly give their statements any media coverage and we completely ignored the numerous Fatwas issued towards the Boston bomber. There are more fatwas issued against terrorists than anyone else, but the average American probably wouldn’t know that.

          • Jo2Jo

            Mohammed said to kill Christians and Jews Is a “GOOD” Muslim one who obeys the “Prophet” or disobeys him?

          • WuddupDoe

            @disqus_stvssz5oiS:disqus and you know this how?

          • Jo2Jo

            It is in the Hadith “sayings of Mohammed”
            In the Quran he says its ok to kill innocent people when you’re in a Jihad

            The Question
            IS a “GOOD” Muslim one who Obeys the “Prophet” or One who Disobeys Him?

          • Ily Michael

            Are you able to read and comprehend? Have you read the Quran? I would love to be shown any verse that says that because it is not in there!

          • Chris Korhonen

            Ily, actually there are about 164 verses in the Quran about Jihad, most of which talk about killing those who do not believe in Alah (which would include innocent people of different religions/beliefs), retribution against transgressions, and all sorts of happy revenge and killing commands. Have YOU read the Quran?

          • cdboss

            She cant read the blubber is in her eyes.

          • Andy

            Well actually, any person who speaks English can read the Quran, as there is a complete and free English translation online. Some of it is truly compelling stuff. Take this cheery passage from Surah An-Nisa’ for example,

            “As to those women on whose part you see ill-conduct, admonish them (first), (next), refuse to share their beds, (and last) beat them (lightly, if it is useful)”

            I invite you to google the english translation so you to can delight in the wonders of ‘peaceful’ Islam.

          • Kimberly Gibson

            First of all, it’s CAIR, not CARE. And they are serious…..serious about two absolutely amazing, thoughtful, kind, generous, intelligent young men, friends of many, loving sons, who happen to be of the muslim faith, being falsely accused of something they DID NOT do…being condemned and labeled guilty when there’s not even been a trial. A third being interrogated and murdered in his own home, shot in the back of the head, for refusing to admit to something he DID NOT DO. I’ll bet you believe in INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY, don’t you Mr. Flathers….or doesn’t that apply to MUSLIM Americans? If so, YOU are exactly what the government intended to and successfully created.

          • Gman79

            Wait … what?

        • Anjali

          Arab terrorists (as if terrorists are only arab…lets ignore the fact that this terrorist is white) were funded by us to fight the Russians. Its Cold War politics again. Look into how we financed the Chechens too.

          • JohnWayne

            Idiot. Islam has been an anti social, anti civilization, anti human rights death cult for 1400 years.

          • Anjali

            On the contrary, without Islam, Europe would have been stuck in the dark ages. Clearly the Muslim world is going through a dark age of its own, but to say that it has been some sort of death cult for 1400 is ignoring the major contribution Islam played in the human civilization. Coffee, algebra, music (guitar), and the survival of Greek philosophy and epics is thanks to the early Muslims. The Islamic world is responsible for some of the most breathtaking architecture. Muslims had already discovered the smallpox vaccination long before it fell into western hands. The early Muslims found no conflict between Islam and science. Arabs come from the world’s first civilization, so they are not some barbaric uncivilized people. Rather, the current state of the Muslim world is due to colonialism, foreign meddling, and a conflict within their own societies over modernization. Their troubles are all rather recent. P.S. I’m not a Muslim.

          • Glenn Grimstad

            Why are you taking this as a fight towards Islam??? Most Americans actually know that Islam teaches peace. It’s extemists that contort this teaching to gain leadership and power in a religion that has been skewed from what it was written as. Every religion has a virus that can take the great teachings of it and ruin it. All people are saying is these people that were killed by this person probably embraced and did not have a hate towards the Islamic religion. I am NOT a Muslim either, but have many friends that are. None of them or us understand THIS.

          • Anjali

            I was responding to John Wayne who does seem to think this is a fight against Islam.

          • ugh

            Fuq Islam. Piss be upon him.

          • Ken Davenport

            Every religion has a virus that promotes people strapping suicide bombs on their backs to kill as many innocents as it can? Really? Don’t compare Islam to other religions; “radical Christians” or “radical Jews” are not beheading people for insulting Jesus or God or Moses. Get real. Have you read the Koran? Do you not know that there are versus that tell believers to kills non-believers?

          • Gene Mark Miller

            Have you ever read the bible? There are verses that condone much more evil violence than that.
            If you marry a woman who is NOT a virgin, You have the biblical right to stone her to death.
            If your neighbor doesn’t like the scent of your “offering” of a burning calf (i.e. BBQ), than the bible says you have the right to kill your neighbor.
            God commands Moses, at one point in time, to kill all the male children and the female children who had “known man by lying next to him”, but then told Moses to keep all the woman children alive for their own use.

            Please tell me more about how peaceful the Christian religion is.

          • Serge Isaac Barou

            Hey, don’t pretend to be thicker than you are: you are thick enough as it is. Whatever is told in the Bible, Christians don’t chase people in the streets of megalopolises to behead them, or stripe bombs to themselves to murder innocents. Christianity is capable of development – it had gone through reformation, so don’t feign naivete – you are not naive, just an inept agitator.

          • Guest

            Ask an Irishman about this. Or an Englishman. One who’s a bit older than you though, lad. And see what answer you get.

          • Gene Mark Miller

            National Liberation Front of Tripura (NLFT), Anders Behring Breivik, Manmasi National Christian Army, Lord’s Resistance Army (LRA), Army Of God, Hutaree…

            All Christian based groups (From only the last 20 years) that have used violence, bombs, firearms, and other physical harm in the name of their faith.

            That is not even considering the much older Ku Klux Klan and the branches of it in the more modern Neo-Nazi groups.

          • johbee

            The difference is that these excerpts you mentions are not carried out by modern society where as they are in the Muslim culture.

          • Gene Mark Miller

            National Liberation Front of
            Tripura (NLFT), Anders Behring Breivik, Manmasi National Christian Army,
            Lord’s Resistance Army (LRA), Army Of God, Hutaree…

            All Christian based groups (From only the last 20 years) that have
            used violence, bombs, firearms, and other physical harm in the name of
            their faith.

            That is not even considering the much older Ku Klux Klan and the branches of it in the more modern Neo-Nazi groups.

          • Wesley Neill

            Uh can you actually point this out in the Bible for me? Since I’ve read the whole thing, multiple times, maybe I missed something…

          • Gene Mark Miller

            Numbers 31
            1 The LORD said to Moses, 2 “Take vengeance on the Midianites for the
            Israelites. After that, you will be gathered to your people.”

            17 Now kill all the boys. And kill every woman who has slept with a man,
            18 but save for yourselves every girl who has never slept with a man.

          • markml

            It is clear that you have not read the Bible either.

            God did not command Moses to kill children.

            Rather, the verse you are referring to is actually quoting an order that Moses himself gave to his army after winning a battle. The Israelite army had originally spared both women and children, but Moses later ordered the army to kill male children and married women (who were loyal to their husbands and played a role in the original conflict). Both posed a threat to the tribe of Israel.

            So Moses wasn’t the greatest humanitarian, but his actions were probably necessary to ensure the survival of Israel. They were not at all a powerful country like the USA, and they constantly faced possible extinction. Moses was made their leader, and if he had been a total pacifist, they would have gone extinct. Desperate times call for desperate measures.

            It is important to note that all evidence would seem to indicate that the ancient Israeli people were still quite a bit more civilized than the other cultures that surrounded them, for the times they lived in. The ancient world was very barbaric, and you need to filter everything through that context!

            The Bible is partially a historical record of the times people lived in, not just a bunch of commandments. Not knowing that is proof you haven’t read it.

            Last time I checked, Christians don’t worship Moses either. He was chosen by God, but he was not even close to perfect, and we don’t hold him with anywhere near the same reverence that modern Muslims have for Mohammed.

            I don’t think the Bible says anything about BBQs either. I will say that the death penalty was a more common punishment back then for crimes we wouldn’t consider so severe, but that’s not a lot different than modern day Singapore.

            But then, that was all the Old Testament. God permits violence in the Old Testament, but I don’t think that necessarily means that it please Him. In the New Testament, Jesus tries to teach people to live to a higher standard, that it’s not enough to just live by the laws of the Old Testament.

            Early Christians in the New Testament were opposed to the death penalty.

          • Gene Mark Miller

            So what your saying is that we should pass blanket judgement on all Muslims because their Holy Book is just as violent as Christians, But because its only “Old Testament” violence, It makes it better?

            The point is, BOTH religions were FOUNDED in blood. They BOTH have extreme laws, Which a majority from both religions don’t follow… it doesn’t make them False Muslims or False Christians.
            The problem with organized religion as a whole, is that each one believes the others to be godless pagans.
            But did you know that Jesus is the most quoted prophet in the Qu’ran?
            The way I see all holy books, The Bible, The Qu’ran, The Kebra Nagast, The Torah, Zuangzi, etc, They are meant to inspire its followers, And you will find extremists in EVERY religion.
            So to lay blanket judgements over an entire religion because its holy book is “violent”… well that pretty hypocritical unless you’re a taoist or buddhist. Just think how easily it would be to judge EVERY Christian we meet by the Westboro Baptist Church that claims they are “True Christians”.

          • markml

            No, what I’m saying is that you didn’t read the Bible. That was the most important thing to clarify!

            In the specific example you gave, the Bible is mentioning violence as a record of something that happened, which is very different from commanding it.

            You claim to be an expert of the Bible and the Quran, but it’s clear you only read the cliff notes of these books given to you by someone else.

            I will at least admit that I’m not an expert on the Quran, but from what I know of it, there are a number of passages where either Mohammed or Allah are advocating war against non-believers. Anyone who is Muslim care to challenge that?

            And yes, of course Jesus is mentioned in the Quran. Mohammed knew of Christianity, and was to some extent influenced by it, although the religion he created has very different principles.

            Christianity specifically promotes pacifism. That doesn’t mean that all Christians in history have been pacifists, but despite what you say, acts of violence are not endorsed by the Christian Bible.

            There are plenty of Muslims who are peaceful people too. Not questioning that. But the basic tenants of their religion are not as peaceful as Christianity.

            Your claim that both religions are equally violent is flat-out false.

          • Gene Mark Miller

            Please tell me where I “claim to be an expert of the Bible and the Quran”…

            You can deny the violence from early Christianity, But it doesn’t change history. You can deny the violence from modern Christianity, But it doesn’t make these Extremist Christian groups any less real.

            If the Qu’ran teaches modern muslims violence, Than please explain why the highest and most esteemed Imams from around the world have endorsed the Fatwa against Terrorism, denouncing that extremist groups like Al Qaeda and the Taliban are working in conjunction with the TRUE meaning of the Qu’ran. (Don’t expect to hear about this on US media)

            Thats because, just like Christianity, Islam has extremist groups that take the holy word and use either direct translations, negating parables into fact instead of analogies, Or plainly mistranslating it, Just as the Christian Extremist groups do.

            So why is it that if Christianity has extremist, than they are only “Extremist” and not “Christian Extremist”… But if Islam has extremist, Than they must be labeled as “Muslim Extremists”? Why the double standard?

          • Gene Mark Miller

            And THIS is the largest problem with organized religion. Each group translates the holy word differently, created “denominations”… some are more liberal and some are more conservative…some are extremists. Each group claims to be following the TRUE religion, When they all believe in the same God, with different interpretations of His word.
            I’m not a Muslim supporter and I’m not a Christian supporter… I support truth.
            Both religions were founded in violence, both by and against their believers. (You cannot separate the Old Testament from the New Testament, one by itself is not “The Bible” but only a portion of It.) Both groups continue to maintain extremist groups, And I agree, we should not label them by “Christian” OR “Muslim”, because they do not represent a majority. Instead label them as they are, EXTREMISTS.

          • Gene Mark Miller

            And Westboro is the most calm of the Christian Extremist groups…
            Here are the violent ones that you claim don’t exist.
            http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christian_terrorism

          • Ken Davenport

            I am not a Christian — so I don’t know if the passages you cite are true or not. But even if they are — the reality is that Christians are not carrying out these passages as literal orders to “kill” on a daily basis. Can you cite a single instance where a Christian killed their neighbor because they didn’t like their offering?

            Muslims have taken the violence in the Koran to a literal level. They are killing in the name of Allah and for the slightest provocation. Can you imagine how many people would die if Christians took the blasphemy of Jesus (which is widespread in our secular culture) and killed people because of it? But that doesn’t happen.

          • Gene Mark Miller

            Maybe you should relax with the blanket judgement on all Muslims. Most people in 2010 didn’t hear about this because they were too busy following countless scandals to report about how immans across the world have sponsored a book that supports the idea that Al Qaeda and the Taliban are NOT working in conjunction with TRUE muslim religion and that their extremist acts are still considered evil and wrong by the majority of the Muslim faith.
            http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fatwa_on_Terrorism

          • Gene Mark Miller

            Honestly I would have no problem with this thread if people were capable of ignoring media propaganda and calling it like it is… EXTREMIST Muslims… Not “Muslims” in general.
            I don’t walk around saying “Did you hear about those Christians protesting the military funeral?” No, because that would be insulting to TRUE Christians, So I specify “Westboro Baptist Church.

          • Serge Isaac Barou

            You’re right on the mark, Ken! “Most Americans know that Islam teaches peace”, says Glenn. Peace my ass! Arab propagandists shout from every soap box they can find that Islam is a religion of peace, but those who have eyes to look, ears to listen – and at least a little inclination not to ape the terrorists appeasing media but think for themselves are able to see that the truth is diametrically opposite. Islam isn’t even a religion in the strict sense – it’s a millenarian ideology akin to Communism and Nazism, and even more dangerous for our civilization.

          • http://smu.gs/L1p7XU winston

            Come on, do you think if they had F16’s and phosphorus bombs they would be using suicide vests? Watch: OCCUPATION 101, THE IRON WALL & TEARS OF GAZA .. Then watch FALLUJHA THE HIDDEN MASSACRE, IRAQ FOR SALE, THE POWER PRINCIPLE, WAR MADE EASY, & WHY WE FIGHT then get back to me.

            The bible also tells us to kill non-believers. Stoning comes from the bible, which obviously you have not read or you would know, it is no less violent, or have any less tolerant dictates, supposedly from god, instructing believers to kill the infidels, than the Koran. The difference is in the education of it’s adherents and the proaganda machine that the drives support for what is essentially a needless war on terror. Wars based on lies. Starting with this one: http://smu.gs/L8pTCz

          • Anatoly Ivkov

            have you read Koran? Have have you read Old Testament? Please stop showing your ignorance, Bible like Koran is a collection of dogmas written by various zealots reflecting ideals of their time, and Bible has as much brutality as any other dogmatic book of rules to live by.

            Christianity is not an innocent, “flower-power” type of religion and if you think that it is, please try to humanize crusades for me, they certainly were very peaceful demonstration of the superior faith in the name of Christ. Tell that to up to 2% of the earth population, primarily Muslims and Jews, that were crucified, beheaded, piked up or burned alive.

            Peace.

          • ugh

            I wipe my azz with the qoran.

          • charles Norman

            Crusades would be an example of this wouldn’t they? The attack’s in norway by an extremist chritian would be an example of this.

          • Wesley Neill

            Read the history of the muslim religion. The founder was a murderer, rapist, and a pedophile who out of anger at being punished for his crimes recruited an army that raped and pillaged its way through Africa and the middle east. Town by town they forced men and women to bow and accept the new religion. Those that did not were immediately executed, except for the women and children who were raped first.
            Only todays weak minded bleeding hearts actually believe that Islam is a religion of peace. Sure, there are many muslims that don’t believe in violence. They are no different than Christians who only go to church on Sundays (if that), and then drink, party, lie and cheat their way to the next church service. These people are not real Muslims, and those people are not real Christians.
            Just open your eyes and close your mouths.

          • haad

            you are lair hatefull white racist evil

          • ugh

            And you are a murderous stinkbeard.

          • Serge Isaac Barou

            Ajali, stop reciting the Arab propaganda. Mohammedans got all those cultural achievements when they conquered peoples who made them. Simply put, they had stolen them. There is no absolutely no scientific or cultural breakthrough authored by Mohammedans, from the old time to today, – including algebra, which they had just given an Arab name to, nothing else. But there is nothing surprising in it: even their Koran is a compendium of badly distorted Jewish and Christian texts, and only the life of the old pervert and pedophile Mohie is authentically Arab.
            And who cares if you are a Mozzie or not? You’re eejit, that’s what matters.

          • DHS2020

            All religions are BS business endeavors, got it.

          • Jake_V

            You clearly aren’t a fan of islam, unfortunately, that doesn’t change history.

          • Serge Isaac Barou

            You are right on two counts: I’m not a fan of Islam (as well as of Communism and Nazism, those nice cousins); and I cannot change history. The remaining problem – though not mine, but yours – is that the history YOU know is a revisionist one.

          • MsAnthrope

            There are great similarities between all of the Abrahamic religions. Christianity uses the same base texts as Judaism, but that doesn’t necessarily debase Christianity, does it?

            Also, isn’t there quite a lot of paedophilia and incest in the Bible? Perhaps we should take it as a sign that these texts are indicative of their time, rather than judging them by today’s standards and morals.

            My goodness me, you are quite the bigot! You also seem to be confusing the words ‘Arab’ and ‘Muslim’; they are not one and the same. Perhaps you should stop spouting nonsensical anti-Islamic propaganda, and leave Anjali (**not ‘Ajali’, as you put) alone.

          • Avin

            Anjali, may be you know there is a country on this earth named India.These early Muslims invaded India with most aggression and did all kind of inhuman thing like murdering hundreds of thousand of non-muslim such as hindus, raping their women, destroying temples, burning their houses on the name of spreading message from Islam.Search history abt some early muslim invaders like Aurangzeb, Babar etc.Its good these early muslim got good treatment in return in form of colonialism,foreign meddling.

          • Jake_V

            Maybe….that still doesn’t change history.

          • Anjali

            As an Indian myself, I have to speak out against this exploitation of the Hindu-Muslim conflict. Please spare me, before the Arabs conquered the North the Hindus did the same thing. What stopped the spread of Buddhism in India? Hmmm….why don’t you get back to me on that before you go on about how Islam is the sole religion of violence. Oh and Hindus in Gujurat, the Sikh riots, assassination of Gandhi and the suicide bombing that killed Rajiv Gandhi etc. I have Sikhs in my family so of course I know of Augangzeb. If you are honest, you would also mention Shah Jahan and Akhbar The Great, or would these figures conflict too much with your bigoted narrative. Remember, if there were no muslims in India, then there never would have been a Taj Mahal, Red Fort, ghazals, khattak, Bulleh Shah, Mohammad Rafi, Dilip Kumar or even Shahrukh Khan! For Sikhs and all Punjabis, Islam is significant because Sufism is essential to our culture. Is Sufism not a gift to the world? Is it not a gift to India? I’m Punjabi, and my family certainly suffered from Partition, but it is wrong to forget that just as many, if not more, Muslims died in Partition.

          • Avin

            Gujrat riots,Sikhs riots, assassination,bombing all are happening in todays modern world like different riots are happening in egypt, pakistan within their own religion and belief.You were referring how Islam and early muslim were progressive and invented many thingsWell thats totally false, they just stole all of those achievements by murdering people.Yes murder happens prior to early muslim invaded India in form of stopping Buddhism. But that doesn’t allow early muslims to cross all limits and kill thousand of hundreds of non-muslim and destroy everything which is not related to islam.Well Tajmahal was a Shiva temple..probaly u need to find ur facts again. Go and visit Kutub Minar in Delhi..still u’ll see how these early invaders forgot to omit symbols of hindu symbol before converting it to muslim place. Akhbar was a great murderer and created history as per his convenience.Shah Jahan was women loving character….may be murdered ppl also for that. Other reference r irrelevant , not talking abt early muslims. Islam teaches to kill people and thats what early muslim did, this is bottom line.

          • Anjali

            So you admit what happened to Buddhism but you only want to talk about what the early Muslims did. Do you know what happened to the old Mosques after Partition? I’m scared of people like you who say such lies like the Taj Mahal (which was built on its own!) once being a temple and actually defend ethnic cleansing of Muslims. Comparing riots in India with Egypt, please! There’s no arguing with you, but it’s ok, BJP is growing in India and Hindu fundamentalism is on the rise so you’ll have plenty of company.

          • http://www.madmadrasi.net/ mad.madrasi

            You forgot one more thing. The Delhi Sultanate (and succeeding Mughal empire) were the foundation on which the ‘idea’ of an administratively united India emerged. Before that almost every kingdom (King) thought of itself (himself) and itself alone – even the Gupta, Maurya and Harsha’s kingdoms, though as large as that of the Sultanate/Mughals, never contributed to that unifying thought. British colonisation transformed that administrative unity into political unity. BTW the Mansabdari system introduced by the Moghuls was the first practical land administration and management structure on such huge scale – remnants of that system is still being followed today (much modified, many times amended of course). 😀

          • Avin

            I like Buddhism and wish message of Buddha could be spread all over the universe.Islam teaches to kill people.Any muslim once touches the core teachings of Islam, he/she becomes Tsarnaev and start killing innocent people on the name of Islam.
            The fault is in Islam and not in…..

            Aaj ki mulakaat bas itni,Kar lena baatein kal chaahe jitni…..Subh Raatri…Sabba Khair.

          • Rahul

            No one is denying the splendid contribution many Muslims have made. We are all proud of them.

            However, it is rather naive to blindly ignore the rapid radicalization of Muslims. Sufis among Muslims themselves are highly marginalized now and are being taken over by deobandis and wahabis zealots.

            It is the Supremacist approach that is worrying which proclaims all other religions and their followers are bogus and deserve to be killed. Unfortunate part is the kind of overwhelming approval such bigot, perverted philosophy gets across many muslims countries.

            How naive it is to suggest that all this is happening because of foreign meddling. Who is meddling in India, Bangladesh, Myanmar?

            Fact is that moderates and liberals amongst Muslims are far too few as against those in other religions.

            Comment Voting only suggests this.

          • Jake_V

            Well said and rather accurate…

          • muffinman

            All that was during the Islamic Golden Age ,which ended 7 centuries ago …

          • Thomos Smith Ward

            “without Islam, Europe would have been stuck in the dark ages”
            The main religion that brought humanity out of the dark ages was Christianity, at least in Europe.

          • mariasoledade

            Everybody forgot this is not a religious debate (mine is better than yous type of debate) The point here is that RS is presenting a terrorist suspect as a victim with a romantic aura The FBI should release all the pictures they have of the crime scene to avoid this type of speculation.

          • johbee

            You may not be a Muslim, and you are certainly educated on Muslim history. Most of what they take credit for has been stolen and pillaged. Just look at Constantinople and what the barbarian Muslims did to Ayia Sophia.

          • http://smu.gs/L1p7XU winston

            Though I am in accordance with most of your post, the Arab transmission of Greek classics, are I believe, a myth: http://wikiislam.net/wiki/Arab_Transmission_of_the_Classics

          • Wesley Neill

            Actually it’s thanks to the countries through which the first fanatics lead by this so called prophet (like those today) rode through on horse back raping and burning any town who’s leadership refused to convert to their religion on the spot. It’s been the same ever since.

          • Jay

            A truly ignorant comment. But John Wayne was a myth too — and he’s dead.

          • kenlaw

            Idk about him being white looks like a sand nigger to me

          • Margaret

            Your an ignorant A*S!

          • Jake_V

            you’re ignorant….shhhh let the adults talk

          • DHS2020

            but AMERICA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

          • Johnny Montana

            This kid was not a WASP Caucasian. He was not even a naturalized US citizen. They should have finished the job. Who care why he became what he became, he killed several people so we should extract the penalty from his sorry ass. At least George Zimmerman got it right. Justice for George Zimmerman

          • Margaret

            He was a permanent resident of the US! He became U.S. permanent resident in March 2007. He became a Naturalized U.S. citizen on September 11, 2012! So your ignorant a*s is saying one murderer has rights under US law but another does not?

          • Gman79

            “He became a Naturalized U.S. citizen on September 11, 2012!”

            September 11? Let the conspiritards loose …

          • cdboss

            The cops were bad shots. They should have finished the job just like George Zimmerman did. You Mag are a loser. Go crawl back int o bed with your brother in your mothers basement.

        • DHS2020

          because Zbigniew Brzezinski & company radicalized the Mujahadeen when we were funding and arming them against the Russians.

          When asked if he regretted it, he replied:
          “What is most important to the history of the world? The Taliban or the collapse of the Soviet empire? Some stirred-up Muslims or the liberation of Central Europe and the end of the Cold War?”

          • Gman79

            Why Brzezinski’s statement hasn’t gone down as the worst prediction in history *ever* is beyond me. He was no Nostradamus, was he?

          • oldbuildingsrule

            If you can remember, to most westerners, it was the end of the soviet union

        • Margaret

          Why do Homegrown terrorists exist? You are ignorant and assume all terrorists are Muslim!
          Army of God, Lambs of Christ,Concerned
          Christians, Eric Ruldoph, Hutaree, The Covenant, The Sword, Army of
          Lord, Defensive Action, The Freedom Community, Ted Kazinski, Byron
          Williams, Timothy McVeigh, Terry Nichols, Scott Roeder, Shelly
          Shannon, James Von Brunn, Joseph Stack, James Lee. ALL not MUSLIM! Read a book!

          • ugh

            Dagestan is not part of the US, twit.

          • Margaret

            So your saying there is a difference between Homegrown terrorists and Islamic terrorists? Twit! There is no difference, they both kill idiot read a book!

        • Gman79

          That’s a rather stupid statement, and a crap analogy. Hitler and the Nazis were successful because they managed to make one group of people irrationally hate another group of people based purely on their religious identity. It was the Jews back then, the Muslims now.

        • http://www.anotherwineblog.com WineWonkette
      • fiftyforty

        Anjali ou are a fool. His wounds came about from a shootout earlier in the night when he and his brother were lobbing homemade pipe bombs at the police. Get a clue.

        • Kimberlee

          you have no idea when those injuries were sustained – I, like many, many others watched his capture and all of the events leading up to it. They PUMMELED that boat with gunfire. I am not saying it’s wrong, but if you’re going to call someone a moron, have some factual info to back it up.

          • JohnWayne

            I am curious as to where all those bullets went. That thin fibreglass skin of the boat didn’t stop them. How many people were endangered when a single aimed round would have finished it.

          • kenlaw

            Thin fiberglass? What an idiot. Those bullets will not go through both side of the boat and still have enough velocity to do any type of damage to anyone depending if it was a .223 or .308 it would probably just go through 1 side and just slam into the other pistol rds wouldnt even make it through and if it did it would be in pieces when it exited maybe y0u should fire a gun before you open your dem cock sucking mouth pussy

          • PigmentLiner

            I’ve shot .308 rounds through 3/8″ steel at 100 yards, pretty sure they would clear a couple 1/2″ pieces of fiberglass at 20… I doubt they were shooting that thing with .308 anyways. Tried to fact check the fiberglass density but couldn’t find it; here’s an interesting site though.

            http://www.theboxotruth.com/docs/theboxotruth.htm

            I’m with John Wayne on this one.

          • Mr taco

            Through 3/8 inch steel at 100 yards..? I’m calling shenanigans on that. You sure you’re not slinging .338 lapua rounds down range?

          • gdooley

            .308/7.62 FMJ will make very nice holes in 3/8 sheet, if hit squarely, at 100m.

          • Icarus8

            Uh, I have to agree with Mr taco. .308 rounds won’t penetrate 3/8″ steel. In fact, they won’t even penetrate 1/4″ steel. I base that on the steel silhouette targets we used on the range at Pendleton with our M40A1s and 175-grain match grade rounds. I don’t know the grade of steel with certainty, but I’m confident it was just standard mild steel. I also agree with regard to fiberglass. A .223 rd. will easily punch through multiple layers of fiberglass with plenty of energy left to kill. I haven’t tested that, but I have some experience with terminal ballistics.

          • PigmentLiner

            I guess it really depends on the grade of the steel, since I have empirical evidence to back up my story as well (still have the target). Plenty of similar accounts on here. Curious: http://www.sniperforums.com/forum/misc/28302-308-metal-penetration.html

          • Jake_V

            classy, fool.

          • Mr taco

            Maybe you should take a class in physics before you go spouting off like you know something. At 3200fps and about a 1000 foot pounds of pressure a 223 will most certainly will penetrate fiberglass and have enough force to punch through the other side and kill someone. A 308 is going to have an easier time than that. However, I’m sure they aimed at a downward angle and kept their background behind their target in mind.

          • http://twitter.com/GailC14 Gail Calhoun

            how sure are you of their caution in firing? Would you bet your life?

          • baintomt

            you are an idiot

          • baintomt

            Kenlaw pussy
            you are still and idiot
            you better go shoot some more moron

          • Jay

            Another moron sounds off. What do Dems, cocks and pussies have to do with any intelligent dialogue here. Not getting any? Go get a GED.

          • Christopher Bonham

            Jay, I typically vote Democrat, and even I know that Tsarnaev’s wounds are from the events leading up to his capture. I watched the entire thing unfold while at a hotel up in Denver, and while I don’t own any firearms, I do have a basic understanding of police procedure and tactics – I’m pursuing a degree in Criminal Justice and was taught quite a bit about law enforcement operations during an internship with a local law enforcement agency here in Colorado last year. To all these idiots who are making it obvious that they’re buying into the bullshit conspiracy theories surrounding the Boston Bombing and the suspects, I say this: keep your mouth shut. You weren’t there, and just because some angry loudmouth from Texas (yes, I’m talking about media personalities like Alex Jones and these idiot “Free Jahar” teens) or elsewhere tells you it was a hoax doesn’t give you license to buy right into it.

          • muffinman

            The .308 will go through the boat (unless there is some metal in the frame or other metallic parts inside it) . It has enough energy, especially at such a close range .

          • oldbuildingsrule

            the only idiots here are the suspected bombers.

          • TheDeuce

            That is entirely inappropriate, and only evidences how immature and uneducated you are.

          • Gman79

            Maybe they were magic bullets. Or maybe it was a huge conspiracy so that Obama can now personally kill everyone with drones. Or maybe the boat had a deflector fucking shield. Or maybe …

          • http://twitter.com/GailC14 Gail Calhoun

            Edward Davis Boston Police Commissioner, has said Drones will be a part of the next Boston Marathon Race

          • Lama

            or maybe, you’re an asshole?

          • KevinSchmevin562

            Maybe because there was a high possibility of him having MORE pipe bombs? It’s a reasonable assumption, you know, given the events that took place prior.

          • NoBigGovDuh

            They had thermal images to know he didn’t

          • yangreen

            unexploded bombs dont have a heat signature

          • jake

            who give a flying fuck. They should have domed him in the first place and called it good. Actually they should have desecrated his boday as a warning to all of those religious nuts that we wont stand for there petty bullshit anymore.

          • Matthew Minard

            or put him in front of a camera with a guy behind him screaming some American diatribe about how our religion is better than their religion….

            Just like the friggin terrorists ya moron.

          • http://amillennialist.blogspot.com Santiago Matamoros

            Only a “moron” can equate Christianity and Islam.

            The Son of God committed no sin, spoke only the truth, healed the sick, raised the dead, died for the sins of the whole world, and resurrected, commanding His people to love even their enemies and giving the world the Ten Commandments and the Golden Rule.

            On the other hand, the genocidal pedophile Muhammad preached and practiced anti-Semitism, genocide, child sex slavery, rape, slavery, torture, mutilation, extortion, theft, polygyny, wife-beating, religious and gender apartheid, deceit, sedition, and treason, warning his people that “Allah made me do it, and you will too, or else!” and sacralizing the violation of all Ten Commandments and the Golden Rule.

            Christianity is as far from Islam as Heaven is from hell.

            So, yes, “our religion” is better than theirs.

          • http://amillennialist.blogspot.com Santiago Matamoros

            (A vote down? So, you like genocidal pedophiles masquerading as prophets?)

          • Marta Rizzo

            Is that the same religion as Bush and Cheney who invaded and attacked Iraq, based on lies, for not reason at all, a nation that had nothing to do with WMD, nor ties with 911 or OBL… and in the process over 100K innocent Iraqi babies, women and men were killed? Any other place that is CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY! So that is a good religion?

          • Anonymous

            Riiight … because it was Christianity and religious fervor that sparked off the Iraq War and not something as absurd as the geopolitical and financial interests of a small group of politicians and industrialists. Please tell us more about how pretexts are actually causes, Marta.

          • mariasoledade

            If God hadn t provided
            for so much oil in Iraque…..

          • alexdifeo

            BS, our religion had nothing to do with Bush and Cheney….in fact we let Christians be SLAUGHTERED after the fall of Saddam, Mubarak, Ghaddafi, and now Assad..we are not driven by love for Christian brethren, rather we are driven by power, influence, money, resources..

          • http://www.miketheinfidel.com/ MikeTheInfidel

            This comment has been removed for violating our commenting policy.

          • CDODGE2

            So, because a past president made a bad call in your opinion, this kid had the right to kill innocent people as well?

          • BrickinaWall

            Maybe all he did was make a bad call…..

          • CDODGE2

            Who made a bad call? Tsarnaev?

          • mariasoledade

            Right marta. The head of the same church told on Tv that he only backed Bush because he promised to help him with his charities and not because he believed in Bushes arguments for the war:as Bush didn t fullfill his promise he removed his backing. There has been a lot of crimes commited with God s unknowingly backing up.
            Religion was born to fullfill peoplke s need to explain natural phenomena.The need for it declined as science provided the answers

          • Mark Daniels

            religion is stupid. keep calm and eat taquitos.

          • Dan

            I want some taquitos

          • Matthew Minard

            with that mindset the war is already lost my friend…

            obviously you crapped a lot of religious indoctrination outta your mouth without understand the idea that once you engage in the same behavior as your “enemy” then have lost… kinda like Jesus taught his disciples.

          • Isla

            I usually don’t respond to these kind of things but seriously? Have you read Qur’an or you only know the things that anti-Muslim post on the internet? By reading your comment I see that you know NOTHING about Islam and the prophet Muhammad. Don’t try to play smart and talk about things you don’t know about. First educate yourself on this religion by reading Qur’an or some other book about Islam from people who know about the religion then, and just then you have the right to discuss matters like this.

          • CDODGE2

            Eff the Qur’an… Terrorist

          • Tony

            Both religions are full of shit they both are terrorist groups…

          • Jeremiah Huijdts

            He is just ignorant, best you can do what you did before… ignore it! I’ve red both books, must say was more impressed by the Quran yet it is all just a message, a guideline it does not state to take up arms or whatever. I love this random qoute: Stop taking my book so litteraly

          • CDODGE2

            I’m not ignorant because I don’t like the Qur’an.

          • Jeremiah Huijdts

            no you are indeed not ignorant because you don’t like the Quran, thats ur right as human!

          • CDODGE2

            you’re a retard 😉 and that is your right

          • ugh

            It works great as toilet paper. Lots of sheets too!

          • Phillip Murray

            No religion is better than any other. A person’s religion is based primarily on where you were born, nothing else. Religion, whether Christian, Islam or Voodoo is nothing more than a well developed superstition. Religion has been the cause of most of the misery of the human race. The crusades, inquisitions, witch trials, gay bashing, Boston bombing, all based on various religious beliefs. Wake up and use your brain for something other than memorizing nonsense from the Bible or any other superstitious control manual.

          • Anonymous

            “Religion has been the cause of most of the misery of the human race.”

            Yeah, no, I’d argue that selfishness and its consequences have been the cause of most of the misery of the human race but I’m sure you actually thought that bold claim through and didn’t just parrot some inane, baseless slogan.

          • alexdifeo

            Money and women are the root of all evil! That and the Democratic and Republican party 😉

          • Prodius

            The “love” of money is the root of all evil.
            At least get the quote right.

          • Susan

            Selfishness masked in the name of religion perhaps.

          • solange82200

            Amen brother! Seriously, well said..

          • mariasoledade

            I couldn t agree more.Any religion that functions on the assumption of being the only true one doesn t aknowlege difference and, deserves no consideration

          • Prodius

            So I take it Hitler was a Methodist, Stalin Orthodox Catholic, and Mao was a Presbyterian?
            To claim religion has caused more misery than Atheism is to claim ignorance of the last two centuries.

          • Kathy Dettwyler

            Islam and Christianity worship the same god. The Golden Rule predates Christianity by thousands of years and is part of every religious tradition. Seems like you don’t know much about “your religion”.

          • Ralfine

            Yes, tell that to the dead in Northern Ireland.

          • Jim Jordan

            all religions are delusions, and far more people have been killed in the name of Christianity than in the name of Islam.

          • charles Norman

            You sir are an idiot and have little to no working knowledge of what islam is or preaches, you most likely have not read “Mohammed’s” teachings. Also Jesus is a highly respected prophet in islam and his teachings are included in their teachings. What you have is a very select view of what islam or any religion that isn’t christianity is. By using the same logic I can argue that christianity supports slavery, is anti-gay, pro tortue, execution, polygomy. I could say that christianity has been a net evil in the world far more than islam as it attempted to opress science in the early turn of the millenia whereas islam has been relativly forward looking when it comes to science. Also there are equally extreme christian’s as muslim’s look at the Norway shootings, the treatment of the iraqi population by member’s of the US army.
            And finally a comment on the horrendous actions. They should be persecuted through the court of law with due diligence. At current we do not have enough evidence/ knowledge of the motivations that lead to this act to make any informed comments on why or if he did it. My advice would be sit tight, wait for the trial and gain a better understanding of why there is anger against the US predominently in many middle eastern countries (it is not because you are christian pro tip. But instead might be because you as a country (not as people) have an aggresive view on being the “world police” surveying other countries internet acess, listening in on ambassadors of the country and breaking UN law if it suit’s your purposes. I feel both sides of any war should better understand the other to try and resolve it in a peaceufl manner instead of saying “my religion is better than yours because it is”.

          • mariasoledade

            Right.

          • runnerbp

            The Christian Book of Joshua promotes genocide, Numbers 31:18 “but all the women children that are virgins keep alive for yourselves”?? I guess you kill the rest, but what do you do with all those virgins? Why can’t Christians just stop killing and hating everyone who is not Christian. It sounds like a hate group.

          • http://amillennialist.blogspot.com Santiago Matamoros

            (Five votes down? A person can’t vote down those comments unless they’re Muslim or suicidal.)

          • SuperWittySmitty

            I’m neither, but your comparison of Christianity and Islam doesn’t work very well from an objective standpoint. I’ve heard variations on it from both sides before and it does not work.

          • Dare

            Or its just apparent to me and most people that you are a religious uneducated nut whose words will fan the flames of other religious uneducated nuts.

          • charles Norman

            Hi, just a point. Islam isn’t a hateful, violent or pro peadophilic religion. They actually have very strict punishment’s against peadophiles and rapists and try to support the victim in all cases of such a thing. I just ask that you read religious texts before arguing them and try to take in the greater context of a book rather than pinpointing rather extrmeme interpretations (on the topic of mohammed being a peadophile he married a 12 year old and consomated the marriage at 18, which isn’t really peadophilic it is just a custom to have arranged marriages).
            Btw not a muslim, not suicidal. I’m a happy athiest.

          • Lama

            All religions cause people to see non believers as “others”. When you marginalize people, contempt for them is bred. When you have contempt for people, it can soon turn to irrational hatred and an “us vs them” attitude. You’re brand of religion vs their brand of religion vs my belief in the flying spaghetti monster are all just that…beliefs without a shred of actual, physical, tangible proof. You are free to believe what you want, but don’t go shoving it down people’s throats, or they’ll shove back and shove back hard.

          • tigerpawraw

            What’s a boday, some kind of head scarf or something? Hahahaha!

          • Kathy Dettwyler

            You mean like the right-wing Republican religious nuts?

          • Anonymous

            Wow, you’re views are disgusting, Jake.

          • ayup

            When you say “religious nuts”, I am assuming you are including all forms of fundamentalism in that phrase? Including fundamental Christians who take matters into their own hands in our “civilized” world?

          • ayup

            To clarify, I condemn no religion per se, just those individuals who capitalize on a religion to support their otherwise unconscionable actions.

          • Jeremiah Huijdts

            you need help!

          • wsorrian

            Pipe bombs don’t give off heat until they explode, genius.

          • innocent bystander

            One could assume that the injuries were sustained during the earlier altercation with the authorities due to the fact that the owner of the boat stated that they had seen blood on the boat. That is what alerted them to contact the authorities. Just a little nugget that you might want to consider.

          • Kimberlee

            Absolutely – understood, I’m simply saying there were several opportunities for him to be injured given the day’s events. I’m not in agreement with the statements regarding law enforcement’s handling of the situation.

        • DHS2020

          aerial pic shows him entering boat apparently unscathed. No visible marks.

          • Melissa

            Ariel photos of him entering the boat? What are you talking about? If they had those, Boston wouldn’t have been shut down for an entire day.

          • DHS2020

            ll-media.tmz.com/2013/04/20/0420-dzhokhar-tsarnaev-cbs-boat-3.jpg

          • http://www.miketheinfidel.com/ MikeTheInfidel

            That’s a picture of him GETTING OUT OF THE BOAT, idiot. See the police spotlight? When he got IN the boat, it was daylight.

          • DHS2020

            good call.

          • Aprilxiv

            Pulled that one out of your assular area, huh? Actually, he was discovered because of the blood he left on the tarp climbing into the boat. Remember that? Or have you read or followed any of the ACTUAL story?

          • DHS2020

            I was merely commenting on the image and what it depicted.

            I’m not going to be quick to believe every statement in a story about this incident because there are many “facts” that ended up being wrong, or corrected.

          • 2gether4vr

            This is why people should refrain from commenting. If you don’t have the facts you look pretty ignorant.
            Granted all the facts will not be known until after the trial starts . As far as the picture on the cover, I think using a photo shopped image to portray a mass murderer as a teen heartthrob simply proves that there are those in this country who care very little about integrity. It gets down to the bottom line and nothing else. If the article is as “fantastic” as they claim then this kid’s mug shot or him standing behind the child that he was about to murder because of his fanaticism would have been the moral empathetic decision.
            This is not about the first amendment. Print what you want. It is about utilizing a moral code that dignifies your choices and shows compassion and empathy in those actions. I hope most American’s will show support for the families of those who were killed and the people who lost limbs by letting Rolling Stone Magazine sit untouched on the racks this month.

          • DHS2020

            Not as a teen heartthrob, as a young “Americanized” man who became disillusioned.

            I bet you MANY YOUTH in America can relate to his feelings.

            I’m 31 and fairly successful, and even I am not happy with a lot of what is going on. I’m not going to bomb anyone, though. That only justifies that which I dissent against.

        • NoBigGovDuh

          There is video of the moron cops all opening fire on the boat trying to execute him.

          They didn’t give a second thought to the fact that they could have hit an innocent person.

          • oldbuildingsrule

            I’m sure they did give a second thought about it. Behind the boat was water & I’m sure the area was cleared of innocent civilians.

          • Lama

            Do you know that neighborhood? I do. There is no water there. Yes, its called Watertown. The Charles River is about .5 miles from this location though. No water in that back yard. check google maps if you want proof.

        • Ryan E

          MMMMM I just love gobbling up ” official stories’ as they seem to be so accurate lately. I mean why would they lie right . GTFO

        • Thomos Smith Ward

          Wow, uh, probably because he was throwing bombs that EVERYONE knew he used to kill people with before at the cops who were trying to catch him?

        • Jeremiah Huijdts

          thats irrelevant.. its about the center of the problem, which is most important. Without knowing were the problem comes from it is impossible to solve..

      • I_Go_Pogo

        Madness all around. In the country that a mere 7 years after 9/11 elected a POS like barack hussein obama…um, um, um

        • rdl114

          Not once, but twice did we elect President Obama… using his middle name is like a school kid jibe, so grow up… and he’d win again because the right wingers are just like the terrorists. Anti-human, belief in nothing, mindless destruction, self-aggrandizing, power mad. The end of the radical right wing in the White House is at hand. Hillary for at least 4, then some of the new guard. The white right wing is cooked. Not to mention they are cheaters in elections – cheaters of the worst rank.

          • kenlaw

            Lol You sound like a fag after what that nigger has done to this country there wont be a dem or another big lipped blue gummed stime in the WH for a long time. Thank god……

          • Ily Michael

            Oh your intelligent remarks make us want to listen to you all night! Name calling shows your lack of intelligence, maturity and information.

          • Margaret

            Wow! Your intelligence is stunning. You ignorant racist a*shole!

          • Serge Isaac Barou

            Your animosity toward everybody who is not indoctrinated with your ideology aside… what’s wrong with anyone’s middle name? You are ashamed of yours? Or just of O’bambi’s?

          • Jake_V

            America is doomed because of lame ignorant mindless mind numbing ignorant people like YOU.

            Your statement is so sickening wrong and sad at the same time.

            People like you, YOU are whats wrong with this country.

          • oldbuildingsrule

            “Anti-human, belief in nothing(?), mindless destruction, self-aggrandizing, power mad” describe liberals!! Look in the mirror, please. Conservatives DO have strong beliefs. Power mad are progressive libs, too. I can somewhat see where you’re coming from, but you need to look in a different light, really.

        • DHS2020

          since when has it mattered which puppet figurehead gets installed into the office of the Presidency? LOL voting.

        • Margaret

          Madness all around, we elected a President in 2000 who ignored warning signs from our intelligence community before 9/11

          • P Zano

            So did Clinton.

      • Guest

        Anjali, him and his brother are alleged to have killed a campus cop sitting in his car and almost killing another cop. Those wounds were inflicted when he was shooting back at cops in a standoff where he ran over his fatally wounded brother getting away hours before he hid inside that boat. You should inform yourself before making post. They were firing teargas into the boat to get him to surrender after a robot removed the boat cover.

        • Anjali

          I think they were firing more than teargas into the boat…some 200 rounds of ammunition. That’s what I was referring to.

        • DHS2020

          aerial photo shows young Tsarnaev entering boat with no visible wounds.

          • KSuchdeve

            No. No there isn’t.

          • DHS2020

            my mistake, it is his departure.

      • Glenn Grimstad

        Anjali, Yes there are bad things that happens from our leaders. We all know that. It happens in every country,, but that does not mean its residents agree with the aggression. Americans know where they came from, we embrace it,,, it is why we are the melting pot of the world. NO where in the world can you practice religion as freely as you can in America without repercussion. We had a “white kid” that shot up a movie theatre in a joker costume. This person had a problem and used the media to glorify what he did. He had hate in him. The worst thing we did was put him on the news. He wanted that as now a person with no life now is a media sensation. Now, people that are in total despair will try and outdo him.. This is my point. glorifying him will lead to copycat bombings from weak people that just want their name on the map. You may be the next residual death…. I hope not,, you seem to care.

        • Anjali

          I’m actually against the Rolling Stone cover. I thought the article was really good, but he should not have been on the cover. I’ve been talking about these specific pictures and how they highlight the mistakes that were made. With the Aurora tragedy and then again with the Newton tragedy, I would have hoped we would have engaged in serious discussion about mental health issues and gun control in the country. Unfortunately, nothing has changed. He might become some sort of sick idol for those suffering from depression and mental illness, and you are right about the cover being potentially dangerous. I’ve been mostly talking about how the action before and after the bombings. Especially with the shadiness of the FBI, remember there was a man killed who supposedly was in connection to a murder, but we will never know. That Chechen was shot 7 times, once in the head. That makes the FBI story of self-defense particularly shaky. I feel as citizens we have a duty to address what may be the infringing of our rights.

          • DHS2020

            but he trained MMA! 😉

      • MyBrooklyn

        let the mindless glorification of the authorities, corrupt politicians, and trigger happy FBI …right on the target. People like obeying herd…,,,

        I despise pigs their sole purpose to put fear in people and inflict financial hardship by arresting people or by giving out summonses. Meanwhile these crooks gateway with everything they can from a simple speeding ticket to the extreme like lying and stealing. Damn herd aka people act like obeying fools, will pay on time their bogus tickets, wont question authority
        and act like stupid brainless losers. We need civil unrest in this damn country….or we just move along and keep watching those stupid TV shows or to busy watching non sense on YouTube. I personally don’t have time to watch non sense because system has me by the balls and I work two jobs just to make end
        meets

        • Heidi Farrington

          goodness, how do you find the time to weed through and comment on all this fine news?

        • Christopher Baird

          I’m glad we have police to protest us from people like you. Go to a town festival or farmer’s market some time. The world is very different than you imagine it to be.

      • Laura Berry

        maybe all you guys should stop pretending like you’re an expert on guns, or what happened. Considering you weren’t there, and all you know of is what you’ve read & seen on tv. If people weren’t so quick to insult each other over a debate on something they truly don’t know a damn thing about. Maybe, just MAYBE this world might be a better place. But it’s full of “know it all’s”, and if you don’t agree it’s time to argue over it, and try to one up each other. Reply after reply of someone who thinks they know better than the above person, and insult after insult. None of you make yourselves sound creditible, and only remind everyone of the fucked up world in which we live.

      • IsThatACock

        Kudos to you for calling it as it is. Not enough people are willing to say what needs to be said!

      • Thomos Smith Ward

        It’s not. It’s not a proper response at all. But 2 wrongs don’t make a right.

      • http://www.takeshiyashima.com/#axzz2HvCwY7Om Takeshi Yashima

        I don’t know who u r. but I am simply amazed to see the level of wisdom u have shown here. how do u know so many things and how u managed to write everything in such a wonderful order. I guess u r a lecturer, aren’t u?

      • TheDeuce

        Anjali, you should try working in law enforcement or the military to see just how it feels and how hard a job it is. Then you might understand.

      • Candi Crain

        Maybe if they had offered him a lolly pop and a hug he would have come out of the boat on his own and surrendered?

        Even if your statement had been based on the reality of the event , let us not forget that none of his victims were armed, he is a terrorist on United States soil, he killed innocent American’s. I don’t care if they water board his ass on live TV! America needs to grow some new patriots, the ones we have now are watered down!

      • Triste Lopez

        If it wasn’t for the Asian man and the boat owner…we wouldn’t have gotten them.
        “We?”

      • David_from_San_Diego

        “We should seriously questioned what happened to this once normal kid to turn him into an alleged mass murderer …”
        What happened to him is a brain infection called, “lsIam”.

      • Schuitman Jeroen Laurens

        You are perhaps one of the few who has a sound mind on this issue. People seems to forget that magazines like Rolling Stone can have a great impact on our youth. So by showing Tsjarnaev’s “normal” face it will create awareness that its easy for youngsters to fall into the hands of islamic violent behaviour! Some people just need to think twice before posting anything at all ! Thumbs Up !

      • raulmetalhead

        Some good insights on what actually happened vs what the mainstream media wants us to believe. Please check the comments… some are very informative. Thanks

        http://whowhatwhy.com/2013/05/14/who-in-boston-bombing-story-mysteries/

      • nonyabiz

        Allah is to blame

      • runnerbp

        anjali, why don’t you view catching Tsarnev as simply a very difficult task? Why do you choose to see the police as incompetent? If you begin to think in a logical and rational fashion it is easy to see that even with many, many organized police it was very difficult to find someone who doesn’t want to be found and whose purpose in life seems to be to kill as many people as possible. The idea that more can be done with fewer police with less information is completely irrational.

    • timtedtomtod

      Oh man, how can you possibly think that Rolling Stone’s own decision has nothing to do with Rolling Stone. They knew that photo would look ‘glamorized’ in the context of a Rolling Stone cover shot. I’m not sure yet if they finally answered the question on weather or not they photoshopped it, but that fact is especially important for the way I ultimately feel about it.

      • WilliamYancey

        They also know their readership-young people who are mad at “gubmint” and think the Tsarnaevs were set up. They knew they’d eat this up.

        • Aaron K Kraus

          Rolling Stone’s own demo sheet, for reference.
          http://www.srds.com/mediakits/rollingstone/demographics.html

          • Dan Flathers

            Are you saying the publishers don’t wish to return to the glory days?

          • Aaron K Kraus

            No, just saying that impressionable youths are hardly Rolling Stone’s only audience or even a majority of it. Need proof? Look at the other stories on the cover — On the Bus With Willie Nelson, The Arctic Ice Melt, Gary Clark Jr. – The Reluctant Guitar Hero.

          • Dan Flathers

            Mine was a rhetorical question…Think about it.

          • FunkTron

            A rhetorical question that has little to do with anything real minus proof of some sort that it matters.

      • Heidi Farrington

        you can find the original shot online, it’s been out for a while, all they did really was crop it.

    • Dan Flathers

      Seriously, Aaron?
      One need only look at the byline accompanying the RS cover photo to understand what RS wishes to portray…

      Those concerned with RS “present(ing) him as an enticing role model to young readers because of his looks” are rightly concerned because of the editorial choice.

      • Aaron K Kraus

        “The Bomber; How a Popular, Promising Student Was Failed by His Family, Fell Into Radical Islam and Became a Monster” — yeah, none of that is worth looking into; I’d rather be continually surprised by the horrible things that people do than spend any time trying to understanding why they happen and working to prevent them in the future.

        • Dan Flathers

          That’s what trial analysis is for — not what RS has to say about excusing his presumed ‘troubled family life.’
          BTW: Sarcasm is best effective when having a basis for it.

          • brian_x

            Explaining something does not mean excusing it. Please write that fifty times on the blackboard, erase it, and do it again.

          • Aaron K Kraus

            Thank you for explaining sarcasm to me.

    • Andy Trimble

      My objection is that a scumbag magazine once again glamorizes a scumbag. Freedom of speech and of the press comes with a responsibility, and that is, to tell the truth. It is not to sell magazines. There is nothing cute or sexy or alluring about this terrorist. To post a photograph of him as such is intellectually dishonest, and leads young people and other impressionable minds to value style over substance.

      Freedom of the press is a value. Using it without values, but merely for profit, is disgusting.

      • Adan Avalos

        And you know the truth? There is allways 2 sides of the coin….What american says it happened, What Tsarnaev says it happened…And the truth my boy;It’s the thin line between the 2 sides of the coin.

        • BigDaddy65

          The truth is that these two cowardly brothers put bombs at the feet of innocent men, women and children and walked away smiling. We have video from stores and spectators that confirm this without a doubt. Same kids, same clothes, same backpacks, from multiple sources. So you’re right that there are two sides of this story, the right side and the wrong side. Which side are you on?

        • Guest

          But it’s the Rolling Stones, ffs. That cover has exclusively been entertainers in the past. They are using the event for profit more obviously than anyone else, they deserve the criticism they are receiving.

      • Aaron K Kraus

        That “scumbag magazine” has been awarded three National Magazine Awards for reporting since 1993; that’s more than NYT Magazine, The Atlantic, Newsweek, and National Geographic.

        • Thomos Smith Ward

          Good point, although the only category of that award I would consider relevant would be the “Reporting” one – which the Rolling Stones actually won 4 times since 1986. I wish you had mentioned this in your first comment.

        • Thomos Smith Ward

          But the cover has almost explicitly been reserved for musicians and/or famous entertainers, not mass murderers, which is what makes it more offensive to me. It wouldn’t be offensive if it was just an article within the magazine

          • http://doubleadoublek.com/ Aaron K Kraus

            I think challenging expectations and demanding deeper exploration is probably a good thing.

      • DavidStalling

        Actually, the article and the photo do indeed depict the truth. This terrorist happened to be cute, sexy and alluring. The photo is accurate. It actually helps show young people and others that appearances can be deceptive — that we should actually look at substance over style. You just don’t want to accept and face the truth.

    • Nicholas Match

      Aaron, I love your comment. With regards to your last point though, I would like to say that RS has the right to grab readers attention with a cover that goes against the grain of how we typically portray terrorists. In fact “sensational” is the perfect word because the public’s interest should be provoked by this cover; i.e. proved into READING the article. The juxtaposition within the cover — a seemingly normal looking young man next to giant text “THE BOMBER” — perfectly reflects the content of the article. The line between grabbing the prospective readers attention and doing it for the $$ becomes even more blurry when considering the time and journalistic energy put into an article of this weight, sensitivity, and magnitude.

    • Hey Blue

      Sorry Aaron, you went right off the tracks in the first paragraph. Glamorizing infamous psychopaths has a proven link to ‘copycats’. Putting him on the cover says to unbalanced minds, “hey all I have to do is make a couple of cheap bombs and I can be on the cover of an ultra hip magazine like Rolling Stone”. Do you really believe the shootings in Oregon and the shootings in Connecticut were unrelated?

      Regardless of the 1st Amendment the press has a responsibility to the general public who pays their salaries. Rolling Stone is giving everyone the finger in the name of selling a few more magazines and driving ad revenue. Any claims they make regarding “complexities” and gaining “more complete understanding” is blowing smoke. It’s about the almighty dollar and propping up revenue which has dropped over $56 million since 2007.

      • Aaron K Kraus

        I don’t think the First Amendment says what you think it says regarding the responsibility of consumer-driven press.

        There is no “general public who pays their salaries” except for those that buy their product — even IF they we’re a tax-payer funded media entity, there’s little legal precedent to suggest that the courts would intervene to ban an image from publication.

        • Hey Blue

          Is Rolling Stone legally allowed to publish the picture of the Boston bomber on the cover? Of course. Should they be allowed to publish it? Again, yes. Should they have the journalistic integrity to refrain from publishing sensationalistic covers which put the public in danger just to boost sales? I think so.

      • FunkTron

        Without smoking gun proof, your assertion about shootings in Oregon and Connecticut are worthless. Not to mention a terrible stretch in logic to begin with.

        • Hey Blue

          Right because copycat killings never happen. Get your head out of your ass funky.

    • GreyMatterTripp

      Eloquently stated.

    • Clay Riggioni

      “even sympathetic”? The manifestation of your man crush is more than a little creepy.

      • Aaron K Kraus

        The manifestation of your ignorance is more than a little creepy.

    • KayBee

      Well said! People such as yourself give me some hope that Americans are not all gluttonous imbeciles who prefer to remain in ignorance than broaden their view of the world.

    • nicstage

      Hear! Hear! Very well said.

    • luciano26

      *golf clap*

      • niuguy

        *slow golf clap*

    • Every journalist ever

      “you’re arguing such a narrow view of journalism and journalistic priorities” – You sir obviously have no clue what you’re talking about, because you’re acting like the writers of Rolling Stone are the watchdogs of democracy. It’s a pop culture magazine, not a goddamn news authority. It’s socially irresponsible, and you’re completely inept if you don’t see that. By the way one of the principle ideas of quality journalism is to minimize harm – sticking a terrorist’s face on the cover page of a rock and roll magazine is exactly what good journalist WOULDN’T stand for. Get your act together.

      • Aaron K Kraus

        I think the Nation Magazine Award jury would disagree with your characterization, having awarded the magazine three Reporting awards in the last 20 years — more than NYT Magazine, The Atlantic, Newsweek, and National Geographic.

        • Serge Isaac Barou

          Another blathering with no sense… so journos from the Nation scratch journos’ from RS back… and then the former return the favour… so what? Since P J O’Rourke stopped writing for RS, it became a totally useless rag.

          • Aaron K Kraus

            I’d love to see your approved reading list.

          • P Zano

            Do you think the Nation Magazine Award jury will give RS an award for this article?

    • AmosDWright

      It’s the headline, not the photo. It’s the idea that he’s just a poor, pretty boy, misunderstood, and driven – by a society that failed him – that everyone finds repulsive.

      As the banal observation goes, I’m sure Hitler’s dog loved him. But what the headline does is posit that WE are responsible for him.

      “Yes,” they may begrudgingly admit, “he should be put away in
      the Hague for the rest of his life, but that’s only like a dog that was forced to fight. The failure is ours.”

      You, actually, have it backwards. These folks are not offended that the cover paints him as human, it’s that it paints him as without human responsibilities, and pins them on us.

      During the Iraq theatre, Progressives were (and still are) fond of putting every casualty at America’s feet, as though Syrians who decided to go to Iraq (which is not their country either, FTR), and murder women and children, did not actually decide to do it, were not actually responsible for it. America made them do it. As sure as the sun rises, every death was our fault. The position is absurd – Nepalese did not flock into Tibet to kill Tibetan women as a result of China leveling their temples – but it was tolerated because Bush.

      The farce gets less tolerable when it’s in our back yard.

    • Jen90

      Who cares what he went through. Why don’t you put Osama Bin Laden on your cover and talk about his childhood and what he went through. No you wouldn’t because no one cares and there is no good excuse or reason for what the brothers did. I don’t care if they were beat everyday with a whip and hundred lashes that is still not a good excuse to do this to
      these people. This is the problem we make too many excuses for young people now a days when there is no excuse and needs to be punishment. You all act like he was a troubled “boy” and just drive drunk and had an accident did something stupid acting out. NO! He murder people and blew their limbs off and it doesn’t matter what he went through in his childhood! Not only that but he did it with a smirk on his face and he was very pleased with himself like most terrorist are when they do there attacks

      • Aaron K Kraus

        I think the quote goes something like “Those who make no effort to understand the past are condemned to repeat it but they’ll be too busy complaining about magazine covers to notice what’s happening.”

        Exploring the factors that lead to criminal behavior is NOT the same as excusing the crime.

      • DavidStalling

        I would be interested in reading about the childhood of Osama Bin Laden, and trying to understand what shaped and created the man and his actions. But explaining and understanding are not the same as “excusing.” I did not find anything in the current Rolling Stone article that excused a terrorists actions.

    • Jen90

      I’ll be honest with ya. Everybody got a story. Their parents beat them. They didn’t fit in. They were young and stupid. They were on drugs. Blah…blah…the reasons don’t matter. Otherwise we can just give a pass to anyone. People need to take responsibility period.

      • DavidStalling

        The article tells the story of a particular terrorist. It in no way makes excuses or passes blame onto anyone other than the terrorist. It examines his life and tries to help us understand what led a seemingly normal, likeable guy to do such terrible things. Examination and understanding do not equate to making excuses or passing on blame and responsibility. By examining and trying to understand we may be better able to prevent similar tragic events in the future.

    • JJ

      So well put.

      Though I think the argument could be made that this space (cover of Rolling Stone) is historically used for images of idols and thereby idolizes Mr. Tsarnaev

      Everyone loves to be shocked and outraged but everyone’s talking about it

      When’s the last time Rolling Stone courted this much attention?

      • http://doubleadoublek.com/ Aaron K Kraus

        “Though I think the argument could be made that this space (cover of Rolling Stone) is historically used for images of idols and thereby idolizes Mr. Tsarnaev” — I think this was probably part of their discussion. However, it really only idolizes him if you actively avoid the article and choose to engage the magazine ONLY as a cover image — which is a problem larger than Rolling Stone.

    • Superpower

      You can save your clever logic parsing in defense of pseudo-journalism because in the end, the guy on the cover of The Rolling Stone blew a little kid to bits on Boylston Street.

      • Aaron K Kraus

        True. Now, wouldn’t you like to understand a bit more about why? What motivated him? If there were any opportunities to prevent him from doing so that we missed at the time but could be used to prevent future attacks?

    • Gman79

      Beautifully put.

    • pheromones

      How can you say any of the above has nothing do with Rolling Stone when they chose the photo? Fucking moron.

    • Montjoie

      If you’re an asshole, your name is Aaron.

      • Aaron K Kraus

        Great insight!

      • FunkTron

        If you’ve got no argument and nothing important to add, I’m guessing your name is montjoie.

    • Buck Buckerson

      If one’s concern is that the cover photo glamorizes Tsarnaev–how does that have NOTHING to do with Rolling Stone (a magazine about music where the cover usually goes to rock stars). They are, in fact, the ones doing the glamorizing. It has EVERYTHING to do with them.

    • Schifter

      NOTHING to do with Rolling Stone? If People magazine had put Tsarnaev on their cover, it WOULD have had something to do with People magazine.

      While the article may have been compelling, I think you fail to understand the gravity of the situation.

      Answer me this: If instead of killing 3 people, Tsarnaev had killed 300, do you really think Rolling Stone would have had the audacity to put him on the cover?

      What is the maximum number of people a terrorist can kill before he is no longer worthy of being on the cover of Rolling Stone?

    • DaveGinOly

      You missed my objection – Rolling Stone’s irresponsibility for putting a murderer (any murderer) on the cover of a magazine known for featuring the ultra-hip and the ultra-cool. A “picture on the cover of the Rolling Stone” turns the subject into a cultural icon. With journalistic rights come responsibilities. No murderer should be portrayed, intentionally or unintentionally, as an icon. How the editors missed this responsibility, or why they may have intentionally behaved irresponsibly, is beyond me, considering the place the “cover of the Rolling Stone” has in our culture. The act does discredit to their judgment.

      • Aaron K Kraus

        Can you cite for me the document that delineates these “journalistic rights and responsibilities”?

        As far as your claim that “No murderer should be portrayed, intentionally or unintentionally, as an icon.” well, that’s even more subjective than your first claim. Viewers give photos their meaning. Trying to control a viewer’s reaction is pretty difficult to do in an open society.

    • stampece

      “If your objection is that Rolling Stone’s intention is to drive sales with sensational cover photos, well, yeah.” I guess it’s a matter of whether you think that that’s the only consideration a publication should have, and when they do, whether people have a right to be outraged when it’s a widely distributed magazine visible to anyone entering a convenience mart in Boston and elsewhere. But there’s a bit more than that. Rolling Stone’s text accompanying the image is clearly targeted at Tsarnaev’s cult following (contrast with text that accompanied the ’69 Mason cover), and the photo itself is a selfie, self-selected by the bomber to promote his own image online. Rolling Stone is not the underground, counter-culture publication is in ’69 when they did their Manson cover. It’s a mainstream “institution”. It’s not known to be primarily a news mag like Time. Its cover is famous for presenting rock stars, generally whoever is hot with young fans. It is within this context, I think, that the cover must be considered.

      • Aaron K Kraus

        Well, it certainly differs from TIME in one notable way: it’s won more National Magazine Awards for reporting since 1993 than TIME. In fact it has won more than NYT Magazine, The Atlantic, Newsweek, and National Geographic.

    • nick

      Aaron, please stop drinking the kool aid…..

      • http://doubleadoublek.com/ Aaron K Kraus

        What Kool-Aid am I drinking?

        Speaking of Kool-Aid you shouldn’t drink, care to take a guess at which magazine provided some of the most in-depth and critically-lauded coverage of the Jonestown massacre?

    • FunkTron

      Props to you, Aaron, for cutting through all the emotions and getting to the heart of the matter. This is an excellent comment and well worth all the attention it is receiving.

    • Jim Frame

      You nailed it. Most of these idiots didn’t even read the article.

    • http://marnietunay2.wordpress.com/ fakirscanada

      It takes more than intellectualizing to understand that what the Rolling Stone Magazine did, was done despite the fact they must have known large numbers of people, including all of those directly touched by the bombings, were bound to feel offended – andm that that egregious disregard alone, for the sensibilities of those touched by the bombing, made what the Magazine an unethical act.

      • http://doubleadoublek.com/ Aaron K Kraus

        Even if you think it was insensitive, there’s an important distinction between insensitive and unethical.

        • http://marnietunay2.wordpress.com/ fakirscanada

          Yes. I think what they did was actually unethical: “Not morally approvable.” From the International Business Times: “It was the presentation by a rock ‘n’ roll magazine that seems to be glamorizing — some would say fetishizing — a terrorist. Bathed in soft light, Tsarnaev looks like a member of the Strokes. The photo appears to be a selfie Tsarnaev posted on social media but could just as easily be have taken by Annie Leibovitz.” The Society of Professional Journalist Ethics “includes a section on “Minimizing Harm.” Specifically, the code asks journalists to “show good taste and avoid pandering to lurid curiosity.” It was shock journalism at its nastiest.

    • http://www.facebook.com/mr.cornelison Mike Cornelison

      Rolling Stone can go to hell. I like the two photos of this scumbag with the laser sight spotting his forehead.

      • Matthew Minard

        Mike LIKEY!!!!!

        what a child

    • Oink Trotters

      “an enticing role model to young readers…nothing to do with Rolling Stone”
      – bullshit

      “we are all humans, endowed with a tremendous capacity for both evil and empathy…”
      – bullshit.

      “then you’re arguing for such a narrow view of journalism and journalistic priorities…”
      – bullshit

    • Thomos Smith Ward

      No, no, no, and no. Are you really surprised it’s considered offensive? Tsarnaev is not an entertainer. That cover has almost explicitly been entertainers in the past. Therefore, this is the most blatantly obvious use of this event for profit that I have yet seen.

      It’s a slap in the face to everyone who put their lives on the line in the name of public safety. When I see other media outlets being using the event so blatantly out of place for profit, I’ll be sure to criticize them too.

    • decreator

      Indeed Sir! Well put!

    • Triste Lopez

      if you weren’t the comic book guy on the simpsons, you could have just said, “it’s their legal right to print any cover they choose because it’s their magazine.”
      As for concerns and objections, Rolling Stone is as good as done-for, like so many other gasping, last-leg, dinosaur print products that need cheap tricks to resuscitate relevance.

    • LarrySingleton

      I read the “article”. And this “reporter” obviously doesnt’ subscribe to Jiad Watch, read even one book on Islam or has even read Sheikh Abdullah bin Humaid’s article on jihad.

    • Bolinder

      Go fuck yourself, you terrorist-supporting asshole.

    • standardwilly

      OK so what if RS had done up Tsarnaev in Obama makeup? Or show’d him posing in the RS studio with his gun & some babes? Or sitting at the wheel of a cool muscle-car looking at the camera with a sly, devil-may-care look? Would any of those be inappropriate or offensive? Would I have a right to a beef with RS? Well I have a beef with doing him up like a rock star. Sorry. And yeah my beef IS with rolling stone.

    • Boon Companion

      Yawn.

    • ihf

      I seriously believe there needs to be an internal investigation by the CIA or FBI as to who actually gave the all clear for this cover to be used. Someone working within rolling stone is sympathizing with these terrorists and they need to be flushed out. No matter what they say or what ever reason they give as to why they used his photo, there is no reason to put a terrorist on a young peoples magazine. They want someone else to copy the Boston bomber. We must look beyond the obvious and see the hidden messages in these devilish chess moves made by the underground menace. They are slowly destroying this nation from within.

    • JonaD

      I think the photos above have been released to bring reality to the masses. Too many people with imagination and not enough grounding. I like the ones where he is sitting in the boat, covered in blood… they never showed anything but the FLIR (forward looking infra red) photos during the manhunt and so many people were claiming this guy wasn’t even in there. There are many CRAZY people who grasp at every stupid conspiracy theory they can, but this guy and his brother are real, this guy is pure evil… and yet women still want to suck him off? That informs us about what some Americans have become… start the controversy there!

    • Anondragon

      You’re well designed message hides the fundamental fact that in my opinion you’re missing the big picture.
      What Rolling Stone did was nothing more than advertising for the terrorist. Of course they should be allowed to do so. They could have painted a smiling Stalin if the magazine existed in the 30s while Stalin was busy wiping out 20 million Ukrainians through Starvation.
      The real point is we should be allowed to say that its distasteful. And in this case a good part of society finds it distasteful.
      I think this would be even more sensitive and be a security issue if the man in question was an open enemy to the US IE commiting high treason, or in wartime, etc.

    • http://www.ign.com/blogs/MichaelStevens Michael Stevens

      Yeah, no, being a journalist doesn’t mean you forget what tact is.

      I suppose the fact that these photos were released after the Rolling Stone cover means nothing considering there was absolutely no genuine animosity directed at Rolling Stone over this.

      Nope. The photos above were released solely to drive traffic to the site and not because someone may be a little pissed off.

    • TechArtists

      What a steaming pile of denial.

      Rolling Stone used extremely bad judgement and posted a glamour shot of an unrepentant mass murderer. A glamour shot on the cover of Rolling Stone is a coveted badge of fame. Rolling Stone tells us you can have that badge of fame by committing an atrocity.

    • vee115

      excellent comment. you made your point and actually changed my mind i was uncomfortable thinking 14 yr old girls would fall in love with this tousled, dreamy photo. i thought it was one of those boy banders at first. but yes, this concern has nothing to do with RS once you really consider who and what are presented as heroes and ideals.

    • moz moz

      A similar thing can be said about that Norweigan extremist Brevik who shot all those young people at the youth camp. People wanted to dismiss him as simply ‘crazy’ and were offended when he wasn’t diagnosed as such. I think it is offensive to simply write people off as lunatics, rather than deal with the fact that rational, thinking people can arrive at such terrible conclusions as mass murder. To bury our heads in the sand and call people evil does nothing to prevent future crimes. But if we try and examine the road that led them to the crime, which as you mentioned requires looking at a suspect as a multi-faceted, real human being, we are labeled as ‘disgusting’.

    • Mark Rude

      B.S.

    • Superpower

      You can keep your logic-parsing defense of pseudo journalism. The fact remains that they guy on the cover of The Rolling Stone blew a little kid to bits on Boylston Street.

      • DavidStalling

        That is very true. The fact also remains that the guy on the cover of The Rolling Stone was a good-looking and seemingly normal, likeable guy who doesn’t fit many of our stereotypes and preconceived notions of how a terrorist should look and act and not someone many of us would guess would and could do such horrible things. For that reason, it’s a good match for the cover story.

    • Steve

      You used the word “presents” when the word is Promotes. And that is why the issue is with Rolling stone. /endofstory but nice try.

    • jbentley

      Sorry Aaron. I’m calling bullshit.

      Having that picture on the front page of the New York Times or Washington Post would make sense to provide a human picture of the bomber; those are publications that are trusted with providing journalistic excellence. Rolling Stone represents rock and roll; there is nothing wrong with the picture itself, but were I to see it on the cover of a different magazine, Vogue, let’s say, with a similar tagline, I would be equally confused as to why it should be there – a fashionable, glamorous magazine that is known for covering fashionable, glamorous things.

      Your attempt at altruism is impractical and self righteous. If you think that the people whose spiritual wounds were rubbed with salt by this magazine cover are “arguing for such a narrow view of journalism and journalistic priorities…” then I think your outlook on life is absurdly academic. No one’s mad that an article focuses on the criminal; we’re mad that it makes him look like Jim Morrison.

      You get an A for effort, Aaron. Just not for actually thinking like a human being.

    • Bryan Williams

      This is about the dumbest comment I have ever read on the Internet. What a bunch of insane, leftist garbage. THIS is why our society is falling apart, because the Left’s religion of amorality has become so ingrained in once-traditional American institutions, you people cannot even distinguish between right and wrong anymore. So obsessed with destroying society and rebuilding it into your dystopian fantasyland, you will do ANYTHING that counters common sense. Your favorite pastime seems to be to “humanize” (aka “kiss his ass”) the worst criminals and most evil people on the planet. Anything for the revolution, huh? Who cares how many die? All collateral damage, right? You disgust me.

      • ugh

        Jann Wenner is a ghey athiest who left his wife and three kids for another man. Most of the readers of this despicable rag suffer from the same perverted lack of morals. Figure it out folks.

    • Spike Eskin

      This is the best comment I’ve ever read on a website.

    • Nick099

      This man is not Jim Morrison, nor is he glamorous. If you have ever seen the face of death you would not have written such scibble. Nor would you do anything to encourage the unstable, the radical,or the fanatic, to attempt something like this tragic event again. By RS actions they are clearly encouraging “copycat” activity.

      You can dissect this many different ways to inflate your ego and wow all of the other Lefty worthless morons with your “deep” thinking. Too bad, for all of that, you are still unable to grasp the totality of the consequences and the possible long-term effects of RS’s act.

      Your drivel reminds me of something a college-age student might write. Grow up, your diaper is showing. Imbecile.

    • Joe S.

      Aaron, I appreciate your attempt at simplifying a wide
      spectrum of feelings and attempting to broadly provide different paths of anger and outrage for those of us that don’t see the world as you do. The bottom line is that we, as humans, with a
      capacity for both emotional and intellectual thoughts, have the right to feel however we want to feel. One’s anger towards a particular medium or outlet may not be warranted to you or in-fact justified when one takes the time to think rationally, but then again you’re not in anyone’s head but your own. To simply summarize what, why and where people’s anger should be placed in response to the images published over the last week in a few lousy paragraphs on a comment board is irresponsible. Unless you’re a stakeholder in “Rolling Stone” and people’s protests are personally affecting your well-being, you should concentrate on your own feelings and not try to summarize the thoughts of the masses with a few paragraphs of rhetoric.

      • Unknown1776

        very well said. The man attempts to marginalize people’s feelings on the subject, while telling us how we should feel about this particular subject through his world view.

        And while the article within on Tsarnaev does deal with the real issues behind his story, the cover IS a complete 180 from said story. While I do 100% believe that journalism, no matter how distasteful the subject might be, has that right to spark debate, there is a point where they overreach. This is one of them. There are many other pictures out there for them to have used. He still has friends who could’ve given them a photo. Yet they did make him appear to be a “rock star.” Now, perhaps this was meant to be thought-provoking: the idea that any regular kid (of course, regular is subjective) could turn out so, for lack of a better word, wrong. You go from that glamorized cover to an in-depth, gritty story about the subject at hand, which is, in its way, an attempt at getting a person to think. BUT given the sensitivities of the subject matter at hand (personally I believe his brother was the real monster here and seduced his brother to his way, given the very real emotional attachment that exists between brothers) they should’ve known better.

        Boston is a very proud city. My forebears come from there, and I’ve grown up hearing the stories of its spirit. If you honestly have any inkling as to the feeling of that city, especially after such terrible events, it does not take a genius to realize you’re about to antagonize a very large and close-knit community. They’re a proud people, and this is just a slap on the face.

        Could you imagine the outright furor and indignation there would have been had Rolling Stone done an article with a photo just as “glamorous” on bin Laden following the attacks of 9/11? The author/editor of that particular story would probably (potentially rightfully) never be able to set foot in NYC again.

        So, to come to this glorious ending, while you may have your own views of the subject, however rational/irrational they may be to individuals, there is a very real reaction to be expected from such an article by Rolling Stone. It is not 100% illogical/irrational to see people be unnerved by such journalistic tendencies to put marketing first before thought. They could’ve gone with many other options to still have gotten the point across as far as the subject at hand is concerned.

    • treeher

      Kraus, why are you being such a butt boy for Rolling Stone? I have a friend who lost a job because he put a photo of a noose on the cover of a golf magazine during a Tiger Woods controversy. Now, people are killed, maimed, property destroyed and Rolling Stone portrays the guy as a Jim Morrison wannabe? Compare to the Rolling Stone cover depicting Charles Manson – that showed him as an evil, scary figure. I think a photo of a bloodied Dzhokhar who ran over his brother and shot himself in a cowardly attempt at suicide would be more appropriate.

    • sam

      Sure. I think you need to expand on #4 to hit home though.

    • MichiganGuitar

      Sorry we don’t need bedroom trolls telling us how to think. State your opinion, not a summary of what I think means.

      You are no one.

      • Carol J. Saunders

        He did….17 hours ago.

        Don’t be sad, faulty wiring can be rectified..

    • Jeff C

      orrr we just dont want a terrorists picture on rolling stone because he then gets what he wants. fame. countless people who have murdered are looking for just that and it sends a bad message

    • flying saucer

      Best. Comment. Ever.

    • hunk4hire .

      Blowhard.

      One of YOUR family members was killed by Tsarnaev.

      Tell us you’d still compose this self-congratulatory tripe.

    • Guest

      Aaron, I appreciate your attempt at simplifying a wide
      spectrum of feelings and attempting to broadly provide different paths of anger and outrage for those of us that don’t see the world as you do. The bottom line is that we, as humans, with a
      capacity for both emotional and intellectual thoughts, have the right to feel however we want to feel. One’s anger towards a particular medium or outlet may not be warranted to you or in-fact justified when you think rationally, but then again you’re not in anyone’s head but your own. To simply summarize what, why and where people’s anger should be placed in response to the images published over the last week in a few lousy paragraphs on a comment board is irresponsible. Unless you’re a stakeholder in “Rolling Stone” and people’s protests are personally affecting
      your well-being, you should concentrate on your own feelings and not try to summarize the thoughts of the masses with a few paragraphs of rhetoric.

    • Christopher Baird

      Rolling Stone is a rock star magazine, not a serious journalism outlet. Putting a mass murderer on its cover tells the world: kill a lot of innocent people = rock star celebrity. How can this be so hard to understand? This isn’t a TV show. I was there when it happened. People died. The killer deserves to be forgotten. Not glamorized.

      Aaron K Kraus, you have posted over 26 comments in this one thread. Hijacking a comments thread and drowning out others’ voices does not make you an authority or your comments any more valid. When a religious fanatic blows up your son while you stand and watch and then gets worshipped as a rock star for the act, you won’t be so keen to stretch the gray area of journalism ethics.

      • http://doubleadoublek.com/ Aaron K Kraus

        This “rock star magazine” which you say is “not a serious journalism outlet” has won more National Magazine Awards for reporting since 1993 than NYT Magazine, The Atlantic, Newsweek, and National Geographic.

        I’m commenting and responding to other comments, if you consider that “hijacking a comments thread” well then, we disagree about how comment threads work.

    • Az

      Another idea someone mentioned to me: Perhaps its to show all monsters don’t necessarily look like monsters.

      • Ed_Kel

        That’s pretty much what the EIC of Rolling Stone said. 5 years ago he was a popular kid. Between then and now he somehow fell down and succumbed to radical Islam. He was basically explaining that the magazine was trying to shed light on that aspect of the story.

    • Yukidongo

      They aren’t “humanizing” this demon. They are pandering to the morons that think he is “cute”. They are also, glorifying him and that is a bad move, since it breathes life into the Islamic cause. And, any of you that don’t see that Obama put extremists in power all over the Middle East, and is trying to do the same to Syria–whose population (80%) supports their western way of life, existing freedoms to worship as they please, women working and reading, and they ARE behind Assad–and his agenda is the same here. He has promised certain members of the UN that WE will be Muslim by 2016, and is appointing Extremists to positions in the DOJ, DHS, and State dept to shape our foreign and domestic policy. This boy isn’t evil all on his own. Islam and the supporters of it, are evil. Democracy and Islam are mutually exclusive when you fall under Sharia law. And, you are either with America or Against it. Easy as that.

    • Part Cherokee

      Fair points. Why do you think RS chose this photograph for the cover? What is the potential business benefit to RS?

      (“multidimensional” is the correct spelling and it does not use a hyphen)

    • TIM MCCLELLAN

      My objection is to glib people like you.

    • dimo7

      Spoke like the true Moscovite you are

    • http://wwwdammit.blogspot.com decklap

      Good lord… spare us the undergraduate musings on the human nature of crime. Suffice to say you have missed the point. The man’s issue is with Rolling Stone’s editorializing, and appropriately so. The people who chose the photo cover did so for a specific purpose, so of course it has to do with them and the scope of Tsarnaev’s depravity necessarily cost him the benefit of the doubt when it comes to being soft and cuddly. You can twist yourself into never ending knots of moral equivalency if you like but you do so for your own amusement and don’t really offer anything particularly interesting to the discussion.

    • pepina

      “…about something that has nothing to do with Rolling Stone.” (except that it was Rolling Stone that published the glam op that has the potential to fortify and condone this ‘enticement.’)

      “…we are all humans, endowed with a tremendous capacity for both evil and empathy.” (Allowing evil to triumph empathy is a human choice; very bad choices, occasionally have very bad consequences. One’s pensive face, on the cover of a national magazine, is not a bad consequence.)

      “…a narrow view of journalism and journalistic priorities that the end product would probably do little to educate, enlighten, and engage readers. (I suspect that the victims and their families are already and thoroughly ‘educated, enlightened and engaged.’)

      “….to drive sales with sensational cover photos, well, yeah.” (And that “well, yeah” symbolizes the ultimate act of transforming a lemon into lemonade. God help us.)

    • Melissa Whittinghill

      Well said and I agree with everything you wrote.

    • guest

      If your objection is that Rolling Stone’s intention is to drive sales with sensational cover photos, well, yeah. The well, yeah here shows how as a society we have learned to accept sales and popularity as positive with complete disregard to what those covers represent, the effects they may have, and the sensibilities they may hurt. In general, I’d sort of agree but in this case I think its deplorable to try to profit from a terrorist attack which wounds are still very much open – and you are right boston magazine is driving traffic, but I will go with star wars here, from the light side of the force.

    • mkultra66

      Mr. Kraus, are you saying that Rolling Stone bears no responsibility for glamorizing the alleged Boston Bomber in the eyes of every knucklehead Jihadist looking for inspiration to stuff their underwear full of explosives? I’d venture that many angry, uneducated kids from Crapistan would literally kill to get their smiling faces on the cover of Rolling Stone.

    • disqus_CuhrLDpPHQ

      Sez you. Never heard of Kraus.

    • Mike Goldstone

      The point is that you can look like Jim Morrison and be a terrorist too. Just like you can be a clean-cut young movie star and be a heroin addict. In other words, all I think Rolling Stone was pointing out is that you just can’t spot these people….which is the dilemma for the intelligence services……and having all-seeing eyes through PRISM or whatever probably doesn’t actually help either.

    • SusieQ63

      The people showing “concern” has EVERYTHING to do with Rolling Stone. I’m sure I’m not just speaking for myself in stating that the outrage is stemming from the fact that Rolling Stone glamorizes people, celebrities, and by putting this piece of garbage on the cover they are in fact glamorizing him. A terrorist. He’s not some poor misunderstood lad. He’s a terrorist, plain and simple.

      The editors themselves said in a statement that the terrorist is in the “same age group as many of it’s readers”. How screwed up is that? Let’s glamorize this piece of garbage to our youth.

      If Rolling stone was intending to “drive sales” with sensationalism then they are in fact a major part of the problem in this country. If they’re hiding behind the fact that they wanted to enlighten, or educate, or report to a specific demographic, then they could’ve done a story on the victims and survivors. THAT’S what’s real! THAT’S what we as a nation are left to cope with. Put the spotlight on the victims, not the terrorist because every time his name is mentioned, his likeness portrayed or his image is used, the terrorists get just a little bit closer to winning an we get a little closer to forgetting the victims and losing a sense of what matters!

      • Ralfine

        “The editors themselves said in a statement that the terrorist is in the
        “same age group as many of it’s readers”. How screwed up is that?
        Let’s glamorize this piece of garbage to our youth.”

        You only perceive it as glamourizing because you are dead set on it.

        This guy grew up in America. So, how did you make him what he supposedly is?

        He is your product, if you so will. So what did you do?

        America has 25% of the world’s prisoners. How come?

    • Todd Hymen

      Your a self-immortalizing hypocrite. Slow thinking you read the story. Fast thinking you glance at the cover. Your cover glorifies what this idiot did, and you knew that before you printed the cover. These photos were released as a response by the the Boston Police Department. All your commented voting means is that most people can be fooled. Nice work. The bus leaves at 9. Be under it.

    • James Roy

      Dzhokhar Tsarnaev has nothing to do with Rolling Stone, a MUSIC magazine. Just one small additional part of the objection.

    • FreeDubay

      you read to much into this. Please find a hobby and stop worrying about everything. You have been manipulated by the media.

    • DennisAOK

      Very well put, Aaron! I agree, and I am no fan of the politics of Rolling Stone.

    • Stephanie Choya Guerra

      You’re an idiot. The points you made in defense of the cover are invalid, and I’ll explain why. This issue has everything to do with the company. As a prolific media source, Rolling Stone holds a degree of moral responsibility with regard to the content – that includes images and text – as does any other form of media. That’s the nature of media relations/public relations. Therefore, Rolling Stone magazine is 100% accountable for a tactless cover page, and should be reprimanded. That’s not to say that there isn’t an appropriate way to approach the personal interest story. The simple the and most obvious approach would have been to portray the bomber as he was, post-bombing. I guarantee you the public would have been much more receptive had they chosen truth over aesthetic; that is entirely the Rolling Stone editors’ faults.

    • magic_beans

      Rolling Stone made the Boston bomber look like Jim Morrison. If they are dealing with the blow back from that choice then too bad. An eight year old boy is dead because of this dude who was granted citizenship on 9/11 a year before he tried to kill as many of his fellow citizens as possible. Rolling Stone needs to put on their big boy pants and deal with their decision to glorify a terrorist who kills children.

      • ByTheWay

        Hitler was on TIME saying he was man of the year!

    • nice_marmot

      Wow. Extremely well said. Excellent.

    • http://call-me-ishmael.com/ Tom Kern

      my problem is not that it humanizes him.
      My problem is it makes him seem “cool” and like a celebrity.
      rolling stone did the same thing with charles manson back in the day.
      displaying him as a rock star does nothing for our understanding, empathy, or “enlightenment”
      it just creates a cult for another idiot

    • Lena Tomsk

      CNN would never hire you. They hate people like you, speaking the truth. :)

    • PalaceGuard

      So, you’re saying that the cheesecake photo of a terrorist just flung itself onto the cover of Rolling Stone, and just happened to stick there? Oooookay…..

    • Arminius

      My concern is that Mr Tsarnaev is still breathing.
      An accident of nature that, one hopes, a definitive conviction will put to right.

    • Peter Acker

      It’s very easy to see the problem most of the population has with this cover. Go to Google and search images of Rolling Stone covers. 99% or maybe more, I haven’t done the math because I haven’t looked at every cover, are celebrated icons of tv, music and television. By all means cover the story as serious journalists, but don’t put a pretty picture of the terrorist on the cover, it feeds the mindset of the Mark Chapman’s of the world, it celebrates them. They knew exactly what they were doing by putting him on the cover and I hope it has exactly the opposite effect of what they hoped for in the long run. Douchebag marketing, not journalism.

    • Robert Strong

      Rolling Stone thought it would be a great idea to glamorize a terrorist. So, yeah, it kinda DOES have to do with Rolling Stone.

    • lsbrew

      Aron. I believe you have over thought this. And perhaps you’re the knid of guy that likes to go back and read what you’ve written later to make you think you are somehow smarter than the rest of us. But deep down you know that glorifying this scum was the wrong thing to do and nothing you can come up with, no matter how good it sounds to you, will change that.

    • Andrew Alvarez

      My objection is that Rolling Stone put him on the cover not because he looks “multi-dimensional – even sympathetic” but because he has a pretty face, and that a glamor shot photo of him exists. If he were less “good looking” or such a shot did not exist, they would not have put him there. So of course it has something to do with Rolling Stone.

    • Evan Dickinson

      “If your objection is that the cover photo glamorizes Dzhokhar Tsarnaev
      and presents him as an enticing role model to young readers because of
      his looks then you’re rightly concerned about something that has nothing
      to do with Rolling Stone.”

      If Rolling Stone is the one presenting him as an enticing role model to young readers you cannot claim that it has nothing to do with Rolling Stone.

      This is in effect propaganda. By your logic if a magazine would present a glowing portrayal of Hitler that would not be the magazine’s fault. By your logic any advocacy of anything by anyone is not the responsibility of those doing the advocacy.

      Heaven help us that such stupid gets 5000 up-votes.

    • Richie Villafuerte

      very thoughtful and well articulated. you hit the nail on the head.

    • IJustDoWhatTheVoicesTellMe

      It would have been a whole lot easier if the sniper just pulled the trigger. Now we have to hear liberals whine about how we should forgive him for his crimes. Typical lib spin I can see coming in the future on CNN, MSNBC, HLN, MSM… “Here is a young man who was attempting to reach out and say, I am a hurt young boy who has been the victim of white privilege (although he’s white). The evilness of America and the ills of oppression against immigrants, legal and illegal, have caused him to ask for emotional help in his own inspirational way. This young man is not evil, just misunderstood.”

    • Benjamin Eugene NElson

      Alleged crimes…?

      Seriously?

    • steelers01

      It accomplished one thing. I will never again purchase or read a copy of RS magazine. I surely hope that I am not alone.

    • shihonage

      I can’t believe this bag of insidious demagogy got so many upvotes. The post is full of sleazy wordplay and red herrings with a singular goal – to ABSOLVE Rolling Stone of the criticism they have rightfully earned.

      He actually dares to equate what Rolling Stone did – glamorizing a murderer – with posting crime scene photos to generate traffic.

      Yes, both acts earn money – but one does it at the expense of the victims. ONE of these acts glamorizes the lowest vile of humanity and encourages copycat killers. The other shows that they are caught.

      But way to intentionally miss the point. You must really like hearing yourself talk, even if the end result is the word-vomit of the kind proudly displayed here.

      This is truly the writing of a moral-relativistic faux-intellectual. A creature without a soul, and barely with a brain.

    • Getrealhippie

      hipster douche. Nuff said.

    • Marrkedman

      Perhaps you’d have a different view if one of your close family members was maimed by this sick muslim slime.

    • CSI America

      Really well thought out and articulate response. Wish everyone online had your depth of insight.

    • sam graves

      When Rolling Stone puts him on the cover, it has EVERYTHING to do with Rolling Stone.

    • Toni

      One main goal of almost all businesses is to make money. So saying that Rolling Stone was trying to make a profit out of this issue – that’s not something unexpected, and shouldn’t even be the topic here – it’s like common sense. Moreover there is no proof that Rolling Stone did this Aug issue ONLY to further increase sales. Besides making money, it is possible that Rolling Stone wanted to present a good article to the public. However since Dzhokhar is an alleged terrorist figure, presenting him on the cover could be very risky, but yet the company still decided to do so – they might have thought it was worth the risk by assuming or even after some calculating that in a very worst case the sales wouldn’t hurt too much as our country always embraces controversies.

      The bottom line is Why would anyone(except for their competitors) have objections if Rolling Stone makes money – which has nothing to do with them. It is the cover and the article that the public are concerned about and it has everything to do with Rolling Stone’s philosophy.

  • http://www.facebook.com/nibblet.nibblet Nibblet Nibblet

    That sniper should have pulled the trigger.

  • NCSP

    “We are outraged that Rolling Stone glamorized Tsarnaev by illustrating its story with a well-known photograph of his face. Here is a picture showing his nipple and abs.”

  • NadePaulKuciGravMcKi

    public has evidence Dzhokhar Tsarnaev
    is being re-manufactured after the event
    manufacturing creative new ‘photographs’ will not
    Salvage Your Destroyed Public Relations Narrative

  • simonsezme

    Thanks for reminding us that all the billions of dollars spent on “terror” is a complete waste of money. Even with warnings from other Nations these keystone cops couldn’t put his brother together. Not even a complete Martial Law lockdown of an entire city was able to find an unarmed teenager who was ultimately discovered by a guy having a cigarette… What a fiasco. Then the morons pumped more than 200 rounds into the boat where the kid was lying. What a bunch of imbeciles. All for an unarmed 19 year old. Pathetic.
    They are too busy listening to everyones skype chats instead of doing real police work.

    • Kyle

      What do you REALLY think about the people keeping your sorry ass alive? I bet you wouldn’t call them imbiciles or morons to their faces, little pussy internet tough guy.

      • Anjali

        Since its our tax dollars funding this whole thing, he has every right to be critical. You don’t have to agree with him.

      • simonsezme

        What name would you use for a large group of Law Enforcement officials who shoot more than 200 rounds of ammunition into a stationery object housing a 19 year old wounded unarmed suspect ?

        • Serge Isaac Barou

          Put on their uniform and do their job better than they do it. Wudya? I’m sure you wouldn’t, you little pussy internet humanist.

        • MichaelBRLA

          What name would I use for law enforcement officials? The word “HEROES” immediately comes to mind. Have you all forgotten that this “wounded” “unarmed” “19-year old” also ignated NUMEROUS bombs — at least one at the Marathon and others while being chased — which killed and maimed 100+ innocent people, not to mention the fact that he and his brother shot and killed an unsuspecting police officer in cold blood, carjacked a man at gunpoint, and terrorized the City of Boston, if not the entire country, for several days?!?!

          • simonsezme

            Well, he is convicted in your mind isn’t he. I will wait for the show trial before I pass judgement thank you.

          • MichaelBRLA

            No, in my mind, he is not convicted. It takes a trial, judge and jury to do that. And while, legally, Tsarneav gets a presumption of innocence, I’m not a judge or jury, so I don’t have to presume #$%!. That said, of course the guy is guilty!!

          • MichaelBRLA

            Why wait? Since we’re not judges or juries, we get to pass judgment in the court of public opinion. If you try to act like you don’t pass judgment on people, well then you’re a liar. And, no, his is not convicted — in my mind or in real life. Only a judge or jury can do that. BTW: Do you really think this guy is going to be found not guilty?! If so, well then you’re a lot dumber than you look! Regardless of my opinion as to whether he did it or not, there is no way in hell this guy gets a fair trial!

          • simonsezme

            Well, you didn’t wait did you? I guess I’m a liar then as I haven’t passed judgment on him. The only evidence I have seen is Law Enforcement firing hundreds of rounds into a stationary object. I think you nailed it on the head when you said he can’t possibly get a fair trial. That speaks volumes.I did notice that 129 commenters clicked on the uptick on my original post to the 7 that clicked the downclick. That tells me something.

          • MichaelBRLA

            Like I said, I don’t have to wait for a trial (and neither do you). I was not being rhetorical when I said, “Why wait?” To the contrary, I was literally asking YOU to tell me why I should wait. Unless you’re THE judge or THE jury in THIS case, you don’t need to wait either.

            And, yes, you are a liar because, despite acting like you haven’t passed judgment, it is quite clear that you have already done so on a few issues. First, you pass judgment on Tsarnaev by implying that he is innocent. Second, you pass judgment on the police and their evidence (or the alleged lack thereof) by concluding that there is nothing more than “Law Enforcement firing hundreds of rounds into a stationary object,” when anyone who has paid attention to this story knows that there is a ton of additional evidence. In the midst of all of your self-righteousness, you also pass judgment a third time by taking aim at the yet-to-be determined judge, jury, prosecutor and defense attorneys. No, you did not expressly mention these people; however, insofar as you have already declared the trial to be a “show,” one can only conclude that you believe they are all incompetent, biased, prejudiced and/or conspiring together to convict Tsarnaev! We don’t even know if there will be a trial, but, according to you, the fix is already in!

            And if the foregoing doesn’t make you feel a little silly, perhaps this will. Your efforts to mask your opinions (particularly by exclaiming that you will not pass judgment until after a trial), have not only failed, but they have revealed an ironic twist. You (purportedly) refuse to pass judgment on this guy in the face of a wealth of information and facts provided by the countless number of media outlets, and, instead, BY YOUR OWN ADMISSION, you will (allegedly) wait to pass judgment, but only AFTER a “show” trial, i.e., a legal proceeding which you have preemptively deemed a sham! So, if the trial court finds him guilty, you will accept that judgment as your own?! You are really going to wait that long to pass judgment and, then, when it finally comes time to formulate your own opinion, you are going to rely upon the findings of a bogus trial?! Your position is utterly and completely flawed; it has no rational basis; it follows no logic; and, quite frankly, it makes you come across as a fool. You are a living, breathing contradiction!

            BTW: What, exactly, are all of the “upticks” and “downclicks” telling you?? Don’t flatter yourself by thinking that they are any indication as to whether you are right or wrong. Unless you forgot already, this website panders to you and other conspiracy theorists like you, so, of course you’re going to have a lot more people who “uptick” your comments than people who “downclick” them. In other words, it only means that you’re surrounding yourself with other nuts!
            Anyway, it’s been fun. Good day!

          • simonsezme

            Are you for real ?

            “And, yes, you are a liar because, despite acting like you haven’t passed judgment, it is quite clear that you have already done so on a few issues. First, you pass judgment on Tsarnaev by implying that he is innocent”

            Last time I looked the Constitution stipulates the presumption of innocence until proven guily. That makes me a liar ? Smoke another one.

            “Second, you pass judgment on the police and their evidence (or the alleged lack thereof) by concluding that there is nothing more than “Law Enforcement firing hundreds of rounds into a stationary object”

            They fired by their own admission more than two hundred rounds into a stationery object with a wounded unarmend suspect. Get a grip.

            “BY YOUR OWN ADMISSION, you will (allegedly) wait to pass judgment, but only AFTER a “show” trial, i.e., a legal proceeding which you have preemptively deemed a sham! So, if the trial court finds him guilty, you will accept that judgment as your own?! You are really going to wait that long to pass judgment and, then, when it finally comes time to formulate your own opinion, you are going to rely upon the findings of a bogus trial?”

            41 of the 67 court filings have been sealed by the Feds… What are they hiding ? Ever heard of the saying Justice must not only be done but seen to be done… More secrecy. If there is one trial in recent memory that should be out in the public it’s this one.

            Uptick downtick doesn’t indicate i’m right just that you are in the minority. Anyone who doesn’t agree with you is a conspiracy theorist ? Get back on your meds Spanky.

            Here is a study just released by Scientists from Kent University in the UK. How does it feel to be a government dupe ?

            http://www.presstv.ir/detail/2013/07/12/313399/conspiracy-theorists-vs-govt-dupes/

          • MichaelBRLA

            Really? When was the last time you looked at the Constitution? If you have, in fact, looked at it, did you actually READ it? You might want to think twice before you lie again by saying that you’ve actually read it because, if you had read it, you would know that it says NOTHING about a presumption of innocence! Please prove me wrong! Please cite the article and/or section of the Constitution upon which you rely! Then again, don’t bother … I already know it’s not in there! So, what are you smokin’, Jack?!

            People like you need to get educated before throwing around big boy words like Constitution and stipulates. Otherwise, your sad attempts to sound smarter than you really are will continue to fail.

            As for the number of rounds shot, I say, “HELL YEA!” I’ll take 200+ rounds fired “into a stationery object with a wounded unarmend suspect” over the possibility — no matter how slight — that another innocent life is harmed every time, ESPECIALLY when the “suspect” is a known terrorist, running from the law after killing and maiming hundreds of innocent people. And don’t give me that “but he was unarmed” crap. AT THE TIME of the incident, nobody knew that for sure, and when you don’t know, you MUST ALWAYS ASSUME a suspect is armed, lest you risk losing your own life. By the way, if this poor, unarmed, wounded, glamour boy was so innocent, why did he run? Why did he hide? Why did he tell the guy he carjacked that he did it? Why did he toss bombs out of the car when police chased him? Why did he leave his brother dead or dying?

            If people like you would just stop and think for a minute, you might realize how silly you sound. Look, I’m not saying that everything the government and the media puts out there is true or that they aren’t hiding something, but their version of the events are much MUCH closer to the truth than any of the conspiracy theories out there (most of which are so riddled with holes that … well, they’d sink faster than that boat with 200+ rounds in it)!

            Do you really not understand why so many of the court filings have been sealed? Perhaps its because, if they weren’t, anyone in the world could read them, including other terrorists. Full transparancy is NOT always a good thing, especially when it comes to issues of terrorism and national security. The last thing we need is for our enemies to get their hands on more of our intel. So, contrary to your opinion, I think this is just one of MANY trials that should NOT be out in the public.

            And why are you so obsessed with the upticks and downticks?! Do you really think they are an accurate indication of whether everyone shares your opinion, or that I am in the minority?! If so, you live in a very skewed reality. Indeed, you and I obviously disagree on many levels, but that doesn’t mean I think everyone who disagrees with me is also a conspiracy theorist. That’s not it at all. You’re a conspiracy theorist because you disagree with the overwhelming majority of people, and, in forming and expressing your opinions, you SUBSTITUTE FACTS AND LOGIC with lies and false assumptions, you reference and rely upon non-existent Constitutional provisions, you make wild allegations that the billions of dollars spent defending against terror is a complete waste of money, you describe hundreds of law enforement personnel as pathetic morons and imbeciles who don’t do real police work, you refer to terrorist bomber as a wounded unarmed 19 year old suspect (as if he were a helpless kitten), you’ve already concluded that his trial is a sham when it hasn’t even been scheduled yet, you think upticks and downclicks are telling you something, you use overbroad terms like “the Feds” and claim they are hiding something and that they are shrouded in secrecy, and you call someone who doesn’t agree with you a government dupe! Yes, these are all tell-tale signs of a conspiracy theorist.
            P.S. I place no stock in your scientists from Kent University in the UK, although I did enjoy reading the peice. I literally laughed out loud! It comes as no surprise that you cite ANOTHER CONSPIRACY THEORIST to lend support to your position. Hell, the author of that article (Dr. Kevin Barrett) is nuttier than you! (For anyone reading this, the following is a cut-and-paste of the Dr. Barrett’s actual bio. I especially like the name of his website (at the end): “Dr. Kevin Barrett, a Ph.D. Arabist-Islamologist, is one of America’s best-known critics of the War on Terror. Dr. Barrett has appeared many times on Fox, CNN, PBS and other broadcast outlets, and has inspired feature stories and op-eds in the New York Times, the Christian Science Monitor, the Chicago Tribune, and other leading publications. Dr. Barrett has taught at colleges and universities in San Francisco, Paris, and Wisconsin, where he ran for Congress in 2008. He is the co-founder of the Muslim-Christian-Jewish Alliance, and author of the books Truth Jihad: My Epic Struggle Against the 9/11 Big Lie (2007) and Questioning the War on Terror: A Primer for Obama Voters (2009). His website is http://www.truthjihad.com.”

          • simonsezme

            The Universal Declaration of Human Rights, article 11, states: “Everyone charged with a penal offence has the right to be presumed innocent until proved guilty according to law in a public trial at which he has had all the guarantees necessary for his defence.”.

            Although the Constitution of the United States does not cite it explicitly, presumption of innocence is widely held to follow from the 5th, 6th, and 14th amendments. See also Coffin v. United States and In re Winship.

            You clearly need help. Whether it be conselling or medication please seek attention at your earliest opportunity. .

            “you SUBSTITUTE FACTS AND LOGIC with lies and false assumptions, you reference and rely upon non-existent Constitutional provisions, you make wild allegations that the billions of dollars spent defending against terror is a complete waste of money”
            Good thing that guy decided to have a cigarette or he would still be lying in that boat. Even in a lockdown they couldn’t find water if they fell out of a boat. Get in the game Spanky

          • MichaelBRLA

            I’m well aware of how the presumption of innocence came to be, but that is not the issue. You said “Last time I looked the Constitution stipulates the presumption of innocence until proven guily,” which is CLEARLY wrong. Hey, anyone with a computer can research the internet and find out about the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Coffin v. United States, In re Winship and a whole host of other sources, but that doesn’t change the fact that you spouted off about something you didn’t know about. Had you known better, you would have said something like, “Last time I looked, the Supreme Court has mandated a presumption of innocence until proven guily.” Again, that’s not what you said. Nice try, Sanchez.

            And you don’t know a thing about law enforcement. Otherwise, you would be singing their praises for catching this guy as quickly as they did. The fact that he was hiding in a boat has nothing to do with whether they would have ultimatly found him. Sure it was a bit of luck, but you act like law enforcement had their heads in the sand the entire time, which is so far from the truth it hardly deserves a response. Suffice it to say that, within 2 or 3 days of the bombing, they located the brothers and, even though they ran, it only took another day or two to catch them. You tell me any other high profile terrorist or other criminal that was apprehended so quickly after his/her crime. I’d bet you can’t name 3 if you can name one at all!

            You are obviously disconnected from reality. I’d tell you to get some help, but you’re beyond gone, past the point of no return, over the cuckoo’s nest. Anyway, I’m not going to waste anymore of my time with you, Scabby. Feel free to have the last word …

          • simonsezme

            You are Government and Law Enforcement wet dream. Your allegiance to the party will be rewarded comrade. Your celebration of State Violence is pathetic

          • Disavowed 1

            Here’s why it won’t ammount to anything, just like the DHS employee named Major Nidal Malik Hasan.

            Thinking Anew – Security priorities for the next Administration.

            Check page 29 of that pdf. And tell me who’s listed as a “participant” of ” Think and do”.

            Lol! You guy’s fell for the radicalized Muslim trick again.
            When are you going to learn? When the US government starts giving Al Q contracts? Oh snap! That just. Happened too!

          • simonsezme

            touche

        • steves_59

          I’d call them bad shots. I’d probably also buy them a beer once the terrorist was in handcuffs and on his way to jail.

        • steve

          bad shots!

          • Bruce_Leet

            lol

      • Disavowed 1

        Why? He exposed exactly who the Boston Bomber was!!!!! Why remove it! Why!
        Plain as day you see who had the detonator and who caught it so she wouldn’t get caught with it.
        I’m going to repost it here and effing everywhere!!! Your aaccomplices to a frime if you dont send that in to authorities! !!
        He didn’t break your rules. You don’t like the video.

    • Mollyheart

      STFU. You are a ridiculous waste of oxygen. I guess even stupid pieces of crap have freedom of speech in this country. But, you, creep, are not worth listening or reading to. Asshole!

      • simonsezme

        I don’t live in your Country. With big money feeding the “terror” business and believe me its a business and business is a boomin results are coming under scrutiny and they aren’t holding up very well in my opinion. I watched the Boston Police Commissioner on CNN at the time and Wolf Blitzer asked him who was doing all the shooting and he said it was his “understanding” it was back and forth. What a buffoon. Thats what you taxpayers are paying for. Billions and Billions wasted every year on this Para Military Police State that can’t find its way home at night

        • Peter M

          You don’t live in USA and you spend most of your day making comments on this forum that are nothing but vitriol against policies and procedures, at the same time you love Americans and their innovation. you must be either unemployed or you seriously neglect your job and spend most of your days posting comments on forums. I wonder if your employer knows about this? You spout facts that you make up, and then leave others to try to clarify them. You sir are a rabble rouser and nothing but an asswipe. Comments in forums are to promote valid discussion not what you are doing. Get a life and get out of here before some ticked off person finds out who and were you live and make an example out of you.

          • simonsezme

            It’s unclear why you would personalize this but it is a little bit creepy. My employment status is something you think about ? I’m flattered. Perhaps you would be kind enough to provide some facts that I have spouted and then left others to clarify ? Also, are you advocating violence because you disagree with my position on certain matters ? Sounds like someone needs to get a life alright. Why are you so angry ? Why do you take my criticism of Government Agencies so personally ? Must I first submit any drafts from comment sections to you for approval prior to publishing from now on ?

          • simonsezme

            Unclear why you would personalize this but it is kind of creepy. You actually think about my employment status ? I’m flattered. Also, are you advocating violence because I don’t share the same position as you ? Please kindly provide some facts that I have “made up” when you have a moment. What am I doing that is offending you to the point of getting personal ? You might want to print out some of your comments for your next doctors visit so he or she can prescribe the right medication and dosage

      • james_from_cambridge

        You ‘guess’ people you disagree with have freedom of speech? You should know they do, idiot! Jingoistic assholes like you are what’s going to ruin this country, not those smart enough to question things. If our Republic can’t withstand differences of opinion without one side overreacting and trying to take the other sides rights away, we’re done as a country and as a way of life!

        Also, although I’m sure you know it deep down inside, you’re a fucking moron! Just an opinion…don’t have me arrested.

        • Mollyheart

          HAHAHAHAHAHA !!! Your slip is showing, James. I said that I guess even creeps like you have freedom of speech. Which means everyone has freedom of speech in this country. So, if this is how you use it… then good for you. Arrest you??? No. Have you repeat 7th grade… yes! LOL… a dumb shit, is a dumb shit!

    • Anjali

      I don’t understand how on one end we have the NSA, listening to everyone’s calls, and then we let major incident happen. I’m sorry, while I’m proud of our police officers, I still feel that this incident showed incompetence and the ineffective methods we have in place for our security. And yes, we can’t overstate the fact that the terrorist was UNARMED in the boat…yet there was a “shoot-out.” We practically killed him when we needed answers…another huge mistake. Just look at that picture of him getting out of the boat, he was barely holding on. And despite martial law on Boston…he still slipped through the cracks and we failed to find him. Had it not been for the Asian guy’s car getting highjacked (with the Muslim gas station owner calling the police) and the owner of the boat stepping outside for a cigarette, these guys would have gotten away. That’s scary. What’s worse is the way we tried to get him after…HUGE waste of funds. WHY do our state troops need such arms, it’s completely unnecessary. Unquestioned celebrating of the authorities while painting this kid as some sort of monster highlights our society’s disdain for complexity and analysis. We will never be a safer country if we don’t seriously study what’s going on and continue to blindly listen to what is told to us by the authority. This incident highlighted the actions of ordinary Americans (who were Asian, Muslim, and white) while showing the incompetence of our government. Showing pictures of a bloody, unarmed 19 year old mass murderer isn’t going to change that fact.

      • Briannabelle19

        Again, you do not know what went on behind the scenes. They knew he was hurt and didn’t go far. They lifted the lockdown on purpose and guess what? Little jackass dickbag got caught!! He was texting his stupid friends. Did you know that? Probably not.

        • Anjali

          I actually did know that he was texting his stupid friends, who later got caught getting rid of evidence and lying to the FBI. Did you know that he was texting his friends waaaay before Boston was put under martial law. And after they lifted the lockdown it wasn’t the police who found the little jackass…it was an ordinary citizen. I’m saying that had it not been for that citizen, the kid (who was already bleeding from earlier wounds) would have bled to death and we never would have gotten him. And when we finally did get to the boat and engaged in a “shoot out” in which the alleged terrorist had no gun, we very well could have finished him off. I’m saying we HAVE to be critical with how those in power handled the situation, both before the bombings and after. There are so many mistakes! Btw, one of his “stupid friends” is an American citizen, a 19 year old, who was interrogated without a lawyer. He didn’t get rid of the evidence himself, but lied about what he knew. That could have been any American 19 year old friend of his at the wrong place at the wrong time, getting interrogated without a lawyer. Read the Rolling Stone article to hear how some of his friends were treated by the Feds.

          • Briannabelle19

            Still stupid friends…I don’t care who they were. They covered for him. You know if you are throwing his shit in the dump/dumpster something isn’t right. Come on.

          • Anjali

            I agree, that was more than stupid!! He had 2 foreign friends who did if for him, and the third was an American friend way back from high school. If you carefully read the three affidavits from the FBI, you can understand the American kid’s mistake and the injustice he went through being interrogated without a lawyer and without council. I recommend reading the affidavits.

      • Actualreader

        So you would have police respond to a terrorist and attempt to capture him with… what? A slingshot? I know! We can arm our police with spit balls! That way, those little terrorists can be sure not to be harmed. We wouldn’t want them to scrape their little knees as they flee through a densely populated area throwing bombs…. Earlier that day, those terrorists were slinging bombs at police and had already killed one officer and severly injured another. Police acted in the manner they are trained. No ONE else- no member of the public-was harmed and the terrorist was caught and taken alive. They did their jobs, and until you train alongside them and attempt to capture a terrorist, you really do not have the knowledge to say whether they did it the right way or not.

        • brian_x

          Agreed. I’m no fan of militarized police forces (hammer and nail syndrome, you know) but their training got the job done in this case. I have a hard time imagining how the whole thing could have gone any differently and still had no more people killed.

    • Serge Isaac Barou

      The kid? The one who just murdered a real kid – 8 years old boy, and teared off his even younger sister’s leg?
      You’re disgusting terrorist’s arse licker.

      • simonsezme

        How does my criticism of Law Enforcement suggest a lack of empathy for the victims ? Because I call the Police yahoos for breaking the law I am a Terrorist arse licker ? Under what other circumstances is it justifiable for Law Enforcement to murder unarmed suspects ? Oh wait… they murdered the other guy Todashev a few weeks later and he was unarmed too. Nevermind

    • Briannabelle19

      You do not know ANYTHING that happened that day. He WAS NOT unarmed. He shot back. And the police shot blanks. They did what they had to do and did it pretty god damn well at that. SO before you come on and run your mouth to something you CLEARLY know NOTHING about…get your facts straight.

      • simonsezme

        Did you see the boat when they were finished unloading on it ? It was unrecognizable. I’m not a gun owner but it would stand to reason blanks don’t put holes in boats

        • Briannabelle19

          I know for fact as being part of WPD. You have no idea what the f*ck went down. I saw ALL of it.

          • Due Process Rights

            Ya? WHAT exactly did you see because I’m calling bullshit! When did he shoot back…. before or after he slit his own throat?! You fucking joke!

        • Becky Alexander

          are you aware that they opened up the boat cover with a remote controlled robotic device to expose him and that was why the cover was destroyed?

          • simonsezme

            Well aware. I’m talking about the swiss cheese look of the actual boat after being riddled with bullets.

      • Anjali

        The initial reports all said he was shooting back…but that was proven to be false. That is the problem with the media, it constantly gives “breaking news” without checking the facts. Then it’s embarrassed to definitively correct itself. He was unarmed.

      • misha2009

        The cops and FBI already admitted Dzhokhar was unarmed in the boat. Why would the cops shoot blanks? Illogical. Briannabelle, if you’re not 18, you shouldn’t be commenting here – and you know you’re not (we know too).

  • sanfordandsons

    He would look a lot more cute with a red hole in his forehead.

  • dontblamemeforthis

    These pics are not gory at all IMO. Would rather see pics of his dead brother after he was run over ( on here – NOT on Rolling Stone) if the intent is to deter.

  • james_from_cambridge

    Did this sargent think these pics would counter the Rolling Stone cover? Is he that deluded? These pics make him out to be even more vulnerable and wounded (literally)…it’s just gonna make those lunatic fan girls feel even sorrier for him. He looks like an injured fucking deer for God’s sake! Stupid, stupid, stupid…

    • misha2009

      Yes James. Hide the truth. When a paramilitary group called the police roll down the streets of suburbia in tanks shooting up houses and an unarmed teenager, don’t leak the photos. Is that what we have come to?

      • Bruce_Leet

        LOL how would they know he’s unarmed when he was alleged to have fired rounds at police with his brother at another location? (the location with the Honda or whatever)

        the tarp and opaque body of the boat would prevent them from knowing he’s unarmed wouldn’t it?

  • qwerty

    check of the evidence first, that actually lacks, and then draw conclusions.dont get influenced by the media

    • MichaelBRLA

      Oh, okay, don’t get influenced by the media? Where, then, pray tell, are you getting YOUR evidence?

  • Joe Gordon

    “Not someone fluffed and buffed for the cover of Rolling Stone magazine.”

    Christ, This tard is a cop. So he implies that RS photoshopped the picture on the cover. Then how the fuck do you explain the fact that the EXACT SAME PHOTO was on the cover of the NYTimes? RS didn’t do DICK to the photograph, but of course we must all BE SHAKING WITH RAGE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    FUCK.

    THAT.

  • Steve1604

    Let’s just hope the us picked a good patsy this time… Innocent until proven guilty is how justice works last time I checked

  • Joy Jones

    oh yeah that boy looks so dangerous huh!??? Lifting his shirt to show he is unarmed and laying down injured on the boat?? Sick people that wanted him dead!

  • Joy Jones

    This looks so dangerous huh!? A boy lifting up his shirt to show he is unarmed and slumped over, injured on the boat! The only dangerous thing I see is that laser pointed at his head!! Sick people wanted him dead!

  • Radius757

    The government and media are getting closer and closer to the “three-minute hate” of the novel 1984. There, citizens were required to gather together and express their hatred for the enemies of the day, as defined by Big Brother. Today we will hate North Korea, Cuba, and Dzhokhar Tsarnaev. At least it is still optional in our time.

    • Bruce_Leet

      Cuba is fine and normal, but do you know what takes place in the prison camps of North Korea? so many prisoners there eat rats as their main food, to such an extent that the local rat population is almost extinct! rat consumption rate has to be very high to outrace the rat breeding rate!

      and what is wrong with hating Dzhokhar who helped to explode an eight-year old boy watching a race with his family? that’s actually a minimal description of his crimes, which are much more lengthy than that.

      • simonsezme

        As twisted as it is it appears Dzhokhar thought he would draw attention to the fact that the US Government murders eight year old boys by way of Wars built on lies and flying robots every day in mostly Muslim Countries. Not a very pleasant way of drawing attention but it didn’t work for him or his brother if they really were the perpetrators anyway. Most Americans don’t seem to think other innocent childrens lives are as valuable. It’s a shame really. The old violence begets violence adage seems more than apt here. What happened in Boston that day would be considered a slow day in many other countries thanks to the good ole USA.

        • Bruce_Leet

          ya how would that draw attention to the flying robots?

          they didn’t leave behind any notes or signs or manifestos to explain why they did what they did… the bombs went off and for a while, many hours in fact, nobody knew who could have done it or why… so how does the bombing point to Reaper drones?

          • simonsezme

            By what he allegedly wrote on the inside of the boat. That they did it as a way to strike back at America for all the murders in other Countries at the hand of the US Government. No one really likes to deal with this question. Its easier to be outraged at a magazine for using the wrong pic even though most of the people here feigning outrage haven’t read the article itself. Very typical

        • brian_x

          Strictly speaking, the drones are not flying robots. They’re remote-controlled. There is a significant difference.

          • simonsezme

            I stand corrected.

    • Don Allen

      Great comment! I agree that much of our commentary for articles has become an analog to the gesticulating verbal release made famous by Orwell. It is important to remember, however, that this was mostly done for the purpose of the party, so that one could show allegiance. Over time… participation breeds the illusion of conformance, but also leads to true conformance as we become desensitized.

      Rolling Stone is free to print anything they want. Too many people have committed their last measure of resolve to make that possible. In a free market, we simply don’t purchase it. I personally will let it rot on the shelves. We vote with our money, that is true capitalism.

      BTW, not to be glib but it’s the “two minutes hate”…

  • Joy Jones

    This looks so dangerous huh!? A boy lifting up his shirt to show he is
    unarmed and slumped over, injured on the boat! The only dangerous thing I
    see is that laser pointed at his head!! They wanted him dead

    • http://zautos.com/ Paul Erna

      Then why is he not dead

    • MichaelBRLA

      Did you not see the “boy” on whose head the laser was pointed?! If you did see that “boy,” then you most certainly saw something dangerous. That “boy” is a killer. Killers are dangerous. Ergo, that “boy” is dangerous!

      • Jason

        The picture on Rolling Stone does not show how he failed expectations it does the exact opposite.
        Now the new pics on Boston magazine show exactly how he failed
        Expectations and that’s the pics that everyone should see not the glamorized version

        • MichaelBRLA

          I agree that everyone should see the Boston magazine pics (and not the glamorized Rolling Stone pics)

    • JP

      Better at HIS head than a pressure cooker full of shrapnel coming at yours or your children! Dead men tell no tales, for sure, but in the end, no matter his story or explanation, the media as well as the public will decide what they want to believe anyway. Facts, or no facts! You can damned well believe that if I had been there, knowing the UNKNOWN danger that may be lurking, I would have had a red dot on his forehead as well!

    • Chris

      Shame on you. Yes he was dangerous, he killed 3 people, injured dozens others, some of whom will never walk again, and fractured the well-being of a major city and the entire country. I personally would have had a hard time not putting a bullet through that red dot.

    • ugh

      We all want him dead sweety. As well as anyone who supports him. You can’t cuddle a terrorist.

  • Adrienne

    What I see is a wounded kid…

    • Peyton

      I see a wounded terrorist.

      • dominika

        you mean SUSPECT

        • Peyton

          No I don’t. I mean terrorist.

          • MichaelBRLA

            Yes! That was a PERFECT response!

          • Due Process Rights

            Yes, because this picture proves what? Doesn’t look like a guy putting something down! Can you even prove was even aware of the bags existence using this pic?! NO!

          • MeniscusDiscus

            Go look for some aliens to defend. I mean the kind from outer space.

    • Anjali

      I see a wounded, unarmed terrorist who supposedly engaged in a “shoot out” with some 200+ officials. The sad thing is that this should have sparked a debate, but everyone rallied around killing the terrorist right away and mindlessly celebrating that we kinda forgot the huge mistakes that were made along the way. Not the mention the FBI going around and killing people while “internally investigating” i.e. exonerating the agents who killed people on dubious groups. That other Chechen dude, FBI arresting his 19 year old American friend who was interrogated without a lawyer present…our rights are getting trampled on and we just look at his blood pictures and celebrate. BTW, how is this a response to Rolling Stone??

      • MeniscusDiscus

        Right on! Quite righteous. FBI murdered the dude and the public – everyone writing on this included – is left without knowing the real facts behind the whole group of those who were with the Boston Bombers. How dumb is our FBI/GOVT?

    • sleekgazelle

      I see a child killer facing justice.

  • Joe Ferro

    God Bless You Sean… Don’t take any S–t from Rollingstone !!! Screw them !!! That “RED DOT” should have made … REAL-RED ” !!!!

  • Joe Ferro

    Should have just taken him out when yah had the chance. Die and learn.

  • Joe Ferro

    See … “Whitey’s” back !!!

  • Jack Gillis

    “…then you’re rightly concerned about something that has nothing to do with Rolling Stone.”
    @Aaron: Context matters, my friend. And this has everything to do with Rolling Stone.

    • Aaron K Kraus

      I assume you’re going to publish this master list of news magazines that you approve of.

  • Jeff Baker

    How is this any different?
    The cover and the article meant to point out that he was a normal kid and then he changed into something horrible. They highlighted some of the changes and possible reasons for those changes.
    All of this information seems very useful to me. Maybe someone will be able to stop these changes before they hurt someone.

  • http://twitter.com/GailC14 Gail Calhoun

    This gestapo styled hunt and over kill is excused frequently in saying something about incompetence, but that is too narrow of a view for this scenario. Added to the event as a whole making it even worse is the mind numbing show of Heads of committees and Government figures looking to further fund the insane apparatus responsible.

  • Joshua Walker

    I am very grateful these photos are being made public. I never post comments or participate in online discussions because everyone has their opinion, but this is a black and white, right and wrong issue for me. I can only hope rolling stone feels a sharp economic backlash for this stupidity. The real face of terror is a cowards face.

  • Due Process Rights

    Sgt. Murphy has apparently forgotten all about the PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE! I’m thinking a civil lawsuit will jog his memory!

    • srock

      As far as the law goes, yes he is presumed until proven guilty. But that doesn’t mean any living organism with more than two neurons firing properly can’t figure out for themselves that this puke is guilty as hell! Good point though

    • Bruce_Leet

      a civil lawsuit filed by whom??

  • disqus_AkAsSvvc8Z

    Personally I take pride in how the police handled themselves. There are at least 3 innocent dead people and hundreds of hurt and permanently disabled. All they were doing was watching the finish of a marathon. This “young boy” was part of the destruction and ultimate harm of all these innocent people. He was unarmed? How did the police know that? He was hiding under a boat cover. I would have shot him point blank through the head and high fived the police doing it. I’m tired of having these terrorist in a jail and feeding them with my tax dollars. If we started killing or putting to death these people they would have less people trying these acts of terror. I personally don’t care why he turned into a terrorist. All I know is he’s alive and the innocent people aren’t. America….take a stand and put him to death. He’s not really going to get what we think is a fair trial anyway. Let’s just save the money of the trial and feed some unemployed person who can’t find a job in this wonderful economy.

  • I’m Just Sayin’

    Surely if the aim was to counter the Rolling Stone front cover, then releasing actual evidence of Dzhokhar placing his bag down, stepping away from it, standing around watching the carnage unfold from the first blast, then calmly walking away amid the panic, detonating his IED and an explosion occuring in the spot where he left his bag would be much more successful than showing what is essentially images of an unarmed, bloody teenager surrendering to scores of police pointing lasers at his head, poised to execute, after already having sustained multiple gunshot wounds? If they want to show the real face of terror, show the conclusive evidence, and whilst they’re at it, explain why the indictment says the IEDs were concealed in black bags, yet Dzhokhar’s is clearly a light grey? The FBI said they wouldn’t be releasing the footage as it may cause people to overreact if they came into contact with the bombing suspects, but Tamerlan has been dead and Dzhokhar has been detained for 90 days, so that reason has been redundant for some time. Now they’re claiming it’s being saved for trial. All these pictures do is incite sympathy, and provide pleasure for people who claim to detest violence yet rejoice in seeing violence done to somebody who is still a suspect and has not yet been proven guilty in a court of law.

  • Robert Karma

    Emotions are clouding the cognitive ability of Sgt. Murphy and those who are in a rage about the RS cover. Have you read the well-written, well-researched, thoughtful examination of this kid turned terrorist inside Rolling Stone? The irony is if you are one of those making ignorant, prejudicial objections to the photo on the cover without reading the story and knowing that the photo was from this kid’s social media profile then you are a part of the problem. The point of the story is that we should be concerned about the our disaffected, troubled youth who feel isolated in their communities. The photo on the cover isn’t that of an obvious jihadist but that of the kid next door. This kid isn’t being glorified but rather critically examined (like a doctor examines cancer) to help us understand the issue and help prevent future terrorist attacks. Knowledge, not fearful ignorance, is the way we make progress against these type of events. So take a deep breath, move past the initial anger, act like a grown up and become an informed citizen which is our responsibility in a Constitutional Republic.

    • Adam Steiger

      Here is where my position differs.

      While you give a positive testimony for the content of the article, the cover photo is capable of suggesting things, otherwise, on an emotional level.

      My position here being, the cover photo and the editorial content (by your testimony) are not congruent with each other. One is suggesting something on an emotional level (cover) while the other (presumably) showcases solid journalism.

      • Jackson Raushenberg

        adam I agree, the cover was not appropriate for several reasons while the story itself is one that should be told, those who say why weren’t the first responders or victims on the cover, well, simply that’s not the story this person is writing, however, the historical context in which RS uses its cover images, outside of charles mans, are 99% of music artists and are stylized shots, this just was not the appropriate placement and use of the image.

        • Adam Steiger

          That is a valid point. Perhaps, Rolling Stone is conditioned towards a “stylized” type of photography.

    • dqdqwdqw

      The article is honestly worse than the cover. It spends the whole time glorifying the terrorist talking about how nice they were and talking to all their friends about them. Not a word is said about the choice they made to become terrorists and kill innocent people. But they have done it and there is no going back, whatever ridiculous motives they had for the attack is irrelevant.

      • simonsezme

        “whatever ridiculous motives they had for the attack is irrelevant.” Really ? Motive is always relevant in any criminal case. Too bad we won’t have an opportunity to see or read any of the testimony. It will be completely cloaked in secrecy. I wonder what the “story” will be for that decision ? One more giant leap for Dystopia….

    • Bruce_Leet

      I agree with you that its a good idea to try to determine what set these two off, but I’m not sure I understand the connection between isolation and murder…

      I’m skeptical that they were isolated to begin with. Tamerlan had boxing partners and other community contacts no? and Dzhokar had numerous friends at the university? or are you saying that one may feel isolated even if one has numerous contacts?

      even with such an explanation I’d still be left puzzled by why they would desire dozens of strangers watching a foot race to have their bodies shredded by nails and metal balls. clearly I do not understand the effects of isolation.

    • Bruce_Leet

      in high school I sometimes spent an extra 30 to 60 minutes in the classroom doing homework after school let out, often totally alone and isolated… and in college I sometimes was in the library until 11pm doing homework, not seeing anybody for hours… in neither case did I feel one ounce of ill will or hatred towards anyone… rather the opposite, the environment was tranquil and pleasant… isolation had no ill effects on me… does that mean my psychology differs from the Tsarnaev’s or the norm in some way, or you are speaking of a radically different species of isolation?

  • http://brianstroup.com/ Brian Stroup

    Children see the world in the context of monsters vs. heroes and can’t wrap their heads around the harsh realities of the world we live in. It’s sad that so many adults choose to regress into similar childish modes of thought when they are scared. Grow up.

    • Anjali

      Our society runs away from any complexity and analysis. Sad fact.

      • Dan Flathers

        I’ll agree with you the moment you condemn the likes of Al Sharpton.

        • Anjali

          Does Al Sharpton profit from racism…yeah probably. It might surprise you to know I’m not exactly a liberal.

    • Dan Flathers

      You and Anjali are hopelessly full of yourselves.

      • FunkTron

        Stroup is dead on the money. People aren’t “good” and people aren’t “evil”. They do good things and bad things. And that’s really it. His analogy is spot on, because children default to either/or fallacy quite often.

  • steves_59

    Unbelievable how many cretinous comments there are on here in support of this terrorist. This “kid” blew up a bunch of people, killed a handful, ran over his brother in his haste to escape, shot and killed a police officer, and cowered in the bilge of a boat.
    I don’t have a lick of sympathy for this crap stain.

    • dqdqwdqw

      Thank you, finally some sense

    • Anjali

      Its not sympathy for the alleged terrorist. Its criticism of the handling of the situation. As tax payers, we are entitled to such criticism.

      • Harley Alderson

        bull thats all i have to say you support terrorism please leave this country immediately

        • Anjali

          I DO NOT SUPPORT TERRORISM!! I’m actually very concerned about our security, that’s why I am critical of the handling of the situation! I’m afraid that if it weren’t for the Asian man or the boat owner, he would have gotten away! Please read.

          • Bruce_Leet

            where would he have gotten away to? at the time they caught him in the boat he had lost so much blood he was on the verge of unconsciousness… his face was plastered on all the news, so where would he have gotten first aid from?

            had the boat owner not discovered him, and he had stayed in the boat, I think he would have died in the boat from blood loss.

            had he left the boat he could not have gotten far… the most he could have done was stolen another car… only to pass unconscious while driving and die? I doubt very very much that anybody would have given him first aid if he went knocking on doors asking for help… only somebody who had missed the nightly news would have let him in their house… or somebody who supported the bombing… wandering around on the streets he would have been discovered by the police, and had he been discovered by an armed citizen his chances of being shot were quite high.

            I think the only way he could have gotten away would be if he could have fashioned his clothing into some kind of bandage to stop the bleeding?

            or did the majority of the blood loss come from the numerous shots fired at the boat? if that’s the case then your scenario of a potential escape makes more sense :) I had the impression the blood loss came from the prior encounter with the police where his brother died, not from the dozens of shots fired at the boat… but maybe my impression is wrong. :) although the boat owner did say he saw blood when he lifted the tarp… so there must have been some wounds sustained prior to slinking into the boat

      • dqdqwdqw

        what could you possibly critize about the handling of the situation? They caught one and the other died, I’d say thats pretty successful

        • Jackson Raushenberg

          I’m sorry Am I on The Taliban comment section, wtf are you people talking about?

  • Steven Tryon

    Beautiful images. What struck me is that, instead of shooting Tsarnaev on the spot, which is what would have happened in many regimes, the police EMT tended to him like the human being he is and got him into an ambulance and to the hospital. I am reminded of CS Lewis’ words, “You have never met a ‘mere human being’.” We have enormous capacity for good — and for evil. What make evil so powerful and reprehensible is the heights from which evil humans have fallen.

    Blessings. Keep up the good work.
    Steve

    • Anjali

      After we practically killed him in a “shoot out” in which he was unarmed. We probably should stick to comparing ourselves to other Western and developed countries. I’m scared if we find solace in the fact that we are better than some other “regimes,” especially given the fact that we are a democracy.

      • Dan Flathers

        You don’t believe Al Sharpton too, do you?

        • Jackson Raushenberg

          Dan I like Al Sharpton, he gets a bad rap from Tiwanna brawly 30 years ago, he has an agenda so he has to stir it up you know? Sometimes he’s a bit goofy… I am what you call a liberal Dan, and I have no clue what these people are talking about, I am against the RS cover, and have ZERO sympathy for this piece of trash. He is LUCKY we have laws and his head wasn’t shot clean off…

      • Steven Tryon

        Unarmed? At the moment, perhaps, but given the number of people he had already killed and tried to kill, any police officer or private citizen who did not assume he was armed and lethal would have been a fool.

  • Michelle Harvey Perez

    these pictures just show the horror that this teenager is going through. can you imagine being shot and chased through the darkness of night, your brother being killed, only to find a short hiding place and then coming out unarmed and being shot again and your throat slit? he is innocent until proven guilty. I am a mother of two teenage sons and my heart breaks by seeing this. My heart goes out to the victims and family of the bombing, but we need to be looking for all the answers and not putting it all on this kid. his dna wasn’t even on the bombs and his backpack was not the one that exploded at the marathon.. and why were there warnings of an “explosion bomb drill” across from the library which happens to be the finish line? what really happened, and what about the boston cop arrested and the the 27 year old dan morely? everyone is still in danger until the true people involved are found.

    • Dan Flathers

      Unbelievable….Literally.

      • Jackson Raushenberg

        am in bizarro land today? WTF are you people talking about?!

    • BeccaLeigh

      First, his throat wasn’t slit and he wasn’t shot after coming out of the boat and second, SpeedBump (his bro) would still be alive if he hadn’t run over him with the car!! People are painfully stupid on this thread

      • simonsezme

        Lot of holes in the Feds story… No surprise the trial will be cloaked in secrecy. They sure have you fooled

        • Dan Flathers

          So glad for you that you think that you are not fooled…

          • simonsezme

            I don’t have any theories or answers. It is a shame his trial will be cloaked in complete secrecy. That is a pretty big tell in my mind. I’m not buying what is being sold. I don’t believe a thing they are saying about this. I was glad he lived because I thought we were going to have an opportunity to see what really happened but it appears not to be. What a terrific Justice system.

          • Bruce_Leet

            ya that is strange… I tend to believe the police story because it is corroborated by the SUV owner who was car-jacked… but I am puzzled why the trial will be secret… have they explained why that is?

          • simonsezme

            They havent really said why but 41 of the 67 court filings are sealed. Not good. What are they hiding ?

          • Michelle Harvey Perez

            maybe we all are being fooled, either way only the kid and God knows what truly happened. we can research all we want and I will continue to do so. however I also believe in my heart and trust my instinct that there is much more to it than we know. things do not add up whether you like it or not. he is innocent until proven guilty. personally I do not believe he did it. and like my mother, my instincts are always spot on. I have a right to my opinion just as you do yours. so we will agree to disagree and find out in a couple of months what the justice system has to say or when they find the true bombers which ever comes first

          • Bruce_Leet

            what’s your hunch on how he sustained those wounds to his body prior to entering the boat? like the boat owner said when he lifted the tarp he saw a bloodied person, so that means that Dzhokhar was bleeding prior to entering the boat… because the dozens of bullets shot at the boat came later… that was an outcome of the boat owner who saw a bloodied person calling 911

      • Michelle Harvey Perez

        I received the info that his throat had been cut from the police interview from the horses mouth so if that’s not true then the police that gave the interview were untruthful. and im not against police, my grandfather was a police officer so no disrespect to them whatsoever. I also read the medical information from jahars relatives concerning his injuries he was shot from one side of his jaw and it came out the back of his neck and will have to go through rehab. my sources are not “heresay” so don’t go calling people stupid for stating the facts

      • cessnadriver

        Speedbump. Thank you for that one.

  • sleekgazelle

    With all the media chatter and discussion of this man’s appearance, it is easy to forget that he coldly murdered four people including an eight-year-old boy, injured countless others, and would have continued to keep on killing innocent people with more bombs if he weren’t stopped by the heroic actions of Boston’s finest. These are the pictures that people truly should see. Thank you for posting these photos.

  • http://twitter.com/GailC14 Gail Calhoun

    Plenty of people out there who only eyeball the news, never read. Dzhokhar was the subject of a irresponsible overly funded man hunt and his brother murdered when they never should have become the focus of any law enforcement activity in the first place.They are both innocent people. What keeps this going is the hate mongers cloaked to appear as “good people” They love to hate and doing it makes them feel alive. No evidence deters them, there have been further arrests related to the Boston Bombings and a confession by one of these-the other a police officer no less!! but not a mention of that, or has this received even a review by the good and the righteous. That bloody manhunt is what they want more of–oh yea. They liked that. Some stalk the web routinely-looking for more victims. Every bit in the news-even a reprinting of a dated news article brings them out to spew. They are amazing.

    • Dan Flathers

      Your viewpoint demonstrates that Socrates was right.

    • MichaelBRLA

      WTF are you talking about?! The Tsarneavs are/were both innocent people?! You need to stop reading and start “eyeballing the news” so you can see the photos of these terrorists planting the f’n bombs!!

    • Wakeupandfreejahar

      I agree with you. These boys are innocent, and what happened to them is sickening. Tamerlan murdered in cold blood, Jahar close to death from the armed police who nearly killed him.

    • Jackson Raushenberg

      lol…what?

    • Bruce_Leet

      how do you figure they are innocent?

      if they are innocent, how did the police choose who to arrest? did they pick them at random? what about the car-jacked SUV owner and what were they doing in his SUV? did he also pick them at random? what is the chances that two people would be randomly chosen by both the police and the owner of that SUV they were using to flee? the odds of that would be astronomical would they not? perhaps several billion or trillion to one?

  • Todd Ridolph

    It’s terrifying that we have such an amazingly large police state, those are the photos that are the “Face of Terror” for me. 911 still hasn’t had a real investigation, let alone all the anomalies on this story.

  • Wakeupandfreejahar

    This is absolutely disgusting, horrifying and sickening. Is this how you treat a 19-year-old boy? It’s terrifying! He looks awful, covered in blood, wounded, but why?! Was there any need at all to hurt Jahar? He is unarmed, didn’t even have a weapon, yet they’re still hurting him?! He is innocent. He nearly got killed, for no reason! I’m shocked, and disgusted. What has happened to people these days, who are completely fine with the fact that this INNOCENT boy nearly got murdered? I’m horrified.

    • dqdqwdqw

      There is nothing innocent about him. He deserves so much worse than what he got.

      • Wakeupandfreejahar

        No he definitely does not. It already looks like they nearly killed him, and now they’re keeping him locked in a cell. How much worse can it get? It’s awful!

        • dqdqwdqw

          He should be tortured every day for the rest of his miserable life, even then it would not be enough

          • dqdqwdqw

            That’s what they would do in his country

          • Wakeupandfreejahar

            But this is not his country is it? He has his rights, too, and he’s an American citizen like you.

          • Wakeupandfreejahar

            Wishing torture on someone who’s already been blamed for something they never did and tortured enough already does not make you any better.

          • Jackson Raushenberg

            This dude is a troll, it’s pretty obvious people.

          • Wakeupandfreejahar

            He’s “guilty.” I’m not a troll anymore now. Ha! You sir are the real troll, accepting the media’s words.

    • Jackson Raushenberg

      Im gonna assume you are being sarcastic here.

      • Wakeupandfreejahar

        I’m definitely not sarcastic. What I say is true. I’m deeply disgusted.

        • dqdqwdqw

          Then go to chechnya and go make friends with his terrorist buddies, and dont let the door hit you in the ass on the way out

          • Wakeupandfreejahar

            I only believe he’s innocent, I’m sorry, because we have something called “innocent until proven guilty.” Ok, I believe he’s guilty now because you tried to insult me. Provide evidence, not insults.

          • dqdqwdqw

            innocent people dont steal cars and shoot cops

          • Wakeupandfreejahar

            Not if they’re trying to surrender, but the cops won’t listen, and continue on their pursuit to murder him.

          • dqdqwdqw

            If they were really on a pursuit to kill him, don’t you think they would have when they found him?

          • Wakeupandfreejahar

            Because, everyone is desperate to get information out of this boy and know the reason “why he did it”, so it would have caused anger and irritation among the public to know they could have gotten information, but couldn’t. Besides, people will question their acts, already people are questioning if the lock-down was necessary for an injured 19-year-old unarmed boy.

          • Jackson Raushenberg

            Multiple federal and local agencies have a clear timeline of events, much of which is in the public domain, if you choose to not believe ANY of it then that’s on you, you’re free to do so…

        • Jackson Raushenberg

          I’m not gonna engage you because either you’re just a TROLL trying to provoke and be funny or you’re serious, if you’re serious there is no starting point to discuss this topic. Was there any need to hurt him? Are you high? I mean I guess if don’t believe ANYTHING the local and federal authorities claimed happened then oh well, what can I say… And BTW what you say isn’t true, it’s an opinion, and unlike in most parts of the world, here you are free to have one.

          • Wakeupandfreejahar

            I am serious. What I say is a fact: If you believe in justice and fairness, you would most likely believe in “innocent until proven guilty.”
            What I have is not an opinion. You also have an opinion that he’s guilty. What evidence do you have? CNN? Fox News? Because they aren’t credible.

        • Kilgore Trout

          You need to grow some balls

    • snook

      Innocent? And how were the officers supposed to know he was unarmed/did not have explosives/other weaponry?

      • Wakeupandfreejahar

        But what was the point of shooting at him? He wasn’t doing anything, just hiding in the boat. He didn’t engage in a fight, he just hid while the officers tried to make him surrender. The guns and weapons were uncalled for.

        • dqdqwdqw

          how do you know all this? were you there?

          • Wakeupandfreejahar

            I did my research, got my information from real eyewitnesses, looked through evidence, videos, articles, and formed my theory. I was not actually there, but I live very close to Boston. I assume you must be there, since you seem to know “all this” and seem to be convinced he’s guilty?

        • snook

          Do you suggest they go up to the boat (again without knowing if he is armed or has any dangerous capabilities) and ask him nicely to come out? Wait for him to starve to death?

          I’m sure he was given an opportunity to “come out with your hands up”

          • simonsezme

            I’m sure he was given an opportunity to “come out with your hands up”
            The evidence suggests otherwise

          • snook

            You can’t take a photo of audio. So I don’t know what evidence you’re talking about since there’s no video above.

          • simonsezme

            They told him to come out with his hands up after they fired two hundred rounds into a stationery object with an injured unarmed teenage suspect in it.

          • Wakeupandfreejahar

            I’m not suggesting any of those. I’m saying the weapons and those awful injuries were uncalled for. Eventually he would surrender, because he would know that he would have to come out anyway, and he was surrounded with guns pointed right at the boat.

        • jules68

          uncalled for??? Did you forget the fact that hours earlier he was in a gunfight with police and throwing pressure cooker bombs? Sounds totally innocent to me.

          • Wakeupandfreejahar

            Have you seen the video of the brothers dropping their backpacks on the ground, because you seem so sure that they did it. And did you actually see them throwing bombs at the police, or shooting at them? Witness it? I think not. You only read a few words and automatically believed it without question. He is most definitely innocent, also.

          • jules68

            so you’re saying if there isn’t a video of it happening, it didn’t exist??? GREAT LOGIC!! Please don’t ever serve on a jury!!!
            I LIVE JUST OUTSIDE BOSTON. I DID NOT JUST “READ A FEW WORDS,” I WAS LIVING IT AS IT WAS UNFOLDING.

            Why don’t you go ask Jeff Bauman, the young man who had both his legs blown off and was the one who gave eye witness descriptions of what he saw. My next door neighbor is friends with Jeff and is currently working as his PR rep. He is no actor, he is very much real and very much a double amputee as a result of this fool you want to free. You’re the one that needs to wake up.

          • Wakeupandfreejahar

            I was not saying that it didn’t exist. You are now assuming, and making up things.

            Also, I never said Jeff is fake did I?

            I only think it’s a little strange, that he wasn’t bleeding all over the place, because he had just gotten his legs blown off, and the ground around him is completely dry. It’s also very strange that his hair was completely different during the Marathon, which was curly, but after the marathon, his hair is straight. His hair color also seems to have changed after the marathon, which isn’t ordinary.

            I think you’re letting your emotions fuel your opinion. I suggest you keep away from media propaganda.

          • jules68

            You said “Have you seen the video of the brothers dropping their backpacks on the ground, because you seem so sure that they did it.” There does not need to be video to prove they did it. There were plenty of people locked in their homes in Watertown that DID. There were also people at the bomb site that saw them drop the backbacks, including Jeff. Maybe you should stop reading those conspiracy theory websites.

            I find it completely laughable that you are comparing one’s looks immediately after getting blown up to how he looks in the media. wth is wrong with you.

          • Wakeupandfreejahar

            But you didn’t think it was very laughable about the part where Jeff wasn’t bleeding all over the place, like he should have, confirmed by doctors, did you?
            But the video is the key to the truth. If there is no video of them dropping the book bags, I’m sure they didn’t do it. If there is, well, I suppose he did it then. But even Gov. Patrick didn’t see the “chilling” video. Says something doesn’t it? If they can release a video of the suspect who injured people in the Oklahoma shooting, why not the video of them dropping the so-called “bombs”?
            And if it’s to let him have a fair trial, you are sourly mistaken, because now, our own news decides if someone’s guilty or innocent. Already people believe he’s guilty.
            What I find laughable is how you believe the news. A radicalized Muslim who hates the US bombed Boston! HA!

    • sleekgazelle

      Take a good long look at those photos. That is the real Jahar. The only thing disgusting, horrifying, and sickening is your deluded fantasy of his innocence.

    • Adam Steiger

      You’ve got to take a step back and realize that this post of yours is entirely laced with emotion; and devoid of any critical thinking.

      Additionally, you made an assumption about the suspect being innocent without having any facts to support that claim.

      • Wakeupandfreejahar

        You made an assumption that he’s guilty without having facts supporting your claim. There are so many holes and lies in this story. One fact, confirmed by authorities and the Boston Globe tweet is that there was a bomb drill going on the same day on the same day as the Boston Marathon. Authorities were also repeatedly telling people that this was only a drill, confirmed by eyewitnesses. I’m also curious: there was a Saudi at the marathon linked to terrorism, and later immediately deported.

        Another fact is there were bomb-sniffing dogs at the marathon, specifically this one, I don’t know why, of all marathons. Why did the FBI ask people at the marathon to delete all their pictures and videos? Also, why would the FBI need assistance in identifying the suspects if they were monitoring them for 3-5 years? The news has also been reportedly caught saying false information, such as Jahar and the armed police locked in a gunbattle, but later they say he was unarmed, had no weapon. Note that in one of the pictures of Dzhokhar walking alongside his brother, the backpack appears to have a cavity, a hollow hole in it, and it looks to be empty. Dzhokhar’s backpack is white, Tamerlan’s gray, clearly not black. I could explain more, I have lots more, but these are a few facts.

    • http://Denverbroncos.com/ Virgil Cole

      You’re okay with him murdering innocent men, women and children though?

      Sick twit.

      • Wakeupandfreejahar

        I’m not okay with murdering innocent people, but I’m not okay with framing someone either, and nearly murdering them, thank you very much.

        • http://Denverbroncos.com/ Virgil Cole

          You’re right. They probably got the wrong guy.

          Or you could really be as delusional as your comments make you out to be, and the guy really is a cold blooded, murdering coward.

          That would be my thought.

          • Wakeupandfreejahar

            I’m sure you’re wrong. He doesn’t seem like the type of person to hurt people, and he has no reason, nothing to gain, from doing it. Although I do applaud the article for actually speaking parts of the truth, that Jahar really is an intelligent, caring, genuinely good person, it doesn’t say that he’s innocent,or state that. He doesn’t even seem like a radicalized Muslim, either, and he didn’t really seem to care about Islam. His brother may have been much more of a Muslim, but I’m positive Tamerlan is a patsy too.

            That would be my thought.

          • http://Denverbroncos.com/ Virgil Cole

            What I’m sure of it that if you don’t get help you are going to end up in a place that you don’t like very much.

            Free yourself.

          • Wakeupandfreejahar

            I’m sure I’m fine, thank you.
            I’m just stating my ideas and facts.
            Apparently that’s wrong, and everyone should have only one idea in their brain, and no one should have another suggestion.

  • Louise Lord

    I am sure the following will be misconstrued by most who read it but here goes: First and foremost, we live in the U.S. therefore freedom of the press is granted to us…no ands, ifs or buts. Secondly, what happened in the great city of Boston is tragic/horrific and mystifying but to me this story goes much deeper than any photos could ever reveal. I believe that Dzhokhar probably was a decent kid(yes, a kid…19 does not necessarily make one an adult with the wisdom of years of life experience) who was caught in a web spun by the very family that was expected to be his role model….instead he was given by fate a radical brother and obviously fanatical mother…..think about it if only for a moment. I believe he had no time to become a “terrorist” in the true sense of the word but instead was spinning out of control without a second for rational thought. Do you know for sure given those very circumstances if you would pull away and run or would you latch on to the only family you have…..make no mistake about it…this young man is every much a victim as those dead and injured and his life is over at the ripe old age of 19….how is it that none of us have the ability when in the midst of tragedy to wear another’s shoes? If the almighty one can forgive this KID then why on earth do we have so much trouble……it could be your son, your brother and how would you write his story then?

    • Nicholas Match

      Empathy may not be the most useful tool in this case, but it is a start. His culture, family, religion, are too foreign for most Americans, including myself, to truly understand and therefore it may not be the right avenue of thought to “put yourself in his shoes”. As far as him being a victim? To a degree, yes, based on the RS article his life was pretty screwed up. But to chalk the whole series of events up to him being victimized by his family is not enough. Strive for a deeper, multi-dimensional understanding. The anger people feel is typically driven by fear. And in this case, many are afraid of understanding this young man so they choose ignorance; the parent of fear.

      • Bruce_Leet

        I haven’t read the RS article yet, so I find your comment very strange… what are readers afraid to understand exactly? are you saying his brother forced him to do everything?

        if that’s the case, why hasn’t he apologized yet? why did he ask for additional lawyers to be added to his team of pro-bono defense lawyers?

        • Nicholas Match

          To understand why he did this and who he is puts many people on edge because there is the fear that perhaps a small part of them would not be able to put 100% blame on him for his actions, or possibly see him as the seemingly normal kid that almost all of his friends though he was. Nobody likes to feel deceived. But until we investigate for ourselves, we won’t know. It’s easier to live in the dark, without understanding, because we can put blame on this “monster” without ever having to expose him as a person. In fact, just a 19 year old kid. Yes he performed a heinous crime, regardless of what/who compelled him to do it and deserves punishment. I cannot fathom why he did what he did, but if he were that passionate about it, then I doubt getting caught would be the thing to make him apologize. And as far as I know, his court-appointed lawyers were the ones who requested a death penalty expert after the number of charges resulting in the death penalty jumped from 2 to 17.

    • http://Denverbroncos.com/ Virgil Cole

      If this guy is a “victim”, then how far back down the chain of his life do we have to go before we find someone who is actually responsible for their actions? Using your logic, no one is responsible for anything they do.

      Because if you’re going to make excuses for what he did, then you can do the same thing for EVERYONE that has ever committed an atrocity. Hell, I suppose we could say Hitler was a victim of his upbringing.

      I don’t give a damn if you were abused and beaten, brainwashed, and tortured, if you know that building a bomb and murdering people is wrong, and you still go through with it, then you are responsible for your own actions.

      He knew full well what he was doing, and did it anyway.

      Victim my ass.

    • Bruce_Leet

      I’d be plenty angry and disappointed at him if it was my son or brother… why would I have so much trouble forgiving him? did you see the pictures of the bombing?? there was people with shreds of limbs left hanging on in extreme agony! …for what purpose?? I think anger at this kid is a totally normal reaction, and I would find forgiveness to be very strange.. why should he be forgiven so quickly? I wouldn’t even consider forgiveness until he made some efforts to undo the massive amount of damage he did!!!

      and he doesn’t seem to be making any efforts to undo his actions! has he even apologized to the families of the murder victims or to the city of Boston??? my understanding is that he has asked for ADDITIONAL pro-bono lawyers!!!! he already has a legal TEAM but he asked for an additional lawyer named David Bruck to be added to his already existing TEAM of defense lawyers!!!!

      doesn’t that sound like he’s planning to plead “not guilty”?? pleading “not guilty” to actions that one has actually performed is lying is it not? and aren’t those lawyers financed by the boston tax-payers??

      that sounds like the height of arrogance to me… to assist in murdering THREE Boston citizens while they were watching a foot race, to assist in having the limbs and flesh flayed from numerous other Boston citizens, to flee from the police, to fire shots at police that could have killed them not to mention could have pierced the homes of people nearby, forcing the police to fire back and risk hitting homes nearby, get caught but NOT apologize and NOT plead guilty, and then have the NERVE TO ASK FOR MORE FREE LEGAL ASSISTANCE FROM THE CITIZENS HE HELPED MURDER!!!

      does that sound to you like he has contrition and remorse?? talk to the hand and grant me more free lawyers???

  • https://sites.google.com/site/911whatyoumighthavemissed/home Tom Fontaine

    Why don’t you show us what really happened…List of Fabricated Crimes – * Palestine * 911 Truths be Told * Israel *

  • steve

    should have a bullet hole where the red dot was!

    • dqdqwdqw

      and a couple hundred more just to be safe

      • cessnadriver

        Why do you advocate murder?

        How does advocating murder over religion make you better than others who advocate murder over religion?

        Answer: it doesn’t .

        • dqdqwdqw

          This has nothing to do with religion, and everything to do with the fact that he planned to kill as many as possible. I don’t care what religion you are, if you do what he did you deserve to die, end of story.

    • cessnadriver

      Murder is always the answer.

      • steve

        people like him killed my family on flight 175, so kiss my ass!

        • cessnadriver

          Did “people like him” turn into a bigot?

          No, you did that yourself.

          Unless you let others be in control of your emotions.

          Murder is never the answer. So kiss my ass.

          • steve

            If you served your country in Vietnam, you have my deepest and heartfelt gratitude, but you can still kiss my ass!!!

  • cessnadriver

    Notice that the laser sights are not trained on CBM.

    The Rolling Stone cover is about the banality of evil.

    • Nicholas Match

      Banality of evil with regards to Tamerlan, yes. Jahar? Not so sure. He was quite assimilated and I think he knew that what he was doing wasn’t normal, but had convinced himself that there was enough reason to carry out the attack, especially with an older more fanatical brother urging him on.

    • http://www.fibrowitch.net Jan Dumas

      As a life long proud Bostonian I read CBM as CHB and laughed my ass off. I read the article and I looked at the picture, yes the RS photo looks a bit shopped, but as I’m in Boston I will not be holding the actual magazine in my hands any time soon. RS wants us to feel sorry for the bombers and the friends that helped him. They also trash UMass Darthmouth and the entire city of Darthmouth. I’m surprised they don’t call the city beantown.

  • Kimberly Gibson

    eff you Sean Murphy. YOU took these photos? YOU should be called in to
    testify about what those guestapo goons did to an innocent, UNARMED,
    young man AFTER he tried to surrender. YOU were there, right? YOU
    witnessed it, right? As a photographer, did you bother to examine the
    other photos collected in an effort to ‘identify’ the ‘suspects’…or
    are you also responsible for shopping them too? YOU make me SICK. Very
    first LIE YOUR bosses told us…. the bombs were placed in BLACK
    backpacks. Did you see the video footage Mr. Murphy? Which of the EVIL
    ‘suspects’ was carrying a BLACK backpack? Which? NEITHER, effing LIARS.
    Hundreds of rounds shot at a boat in a ‘shootout’ ? with ‘evil’ suspect
    who shot HIMSELF in the throat? When, Mr. Murphy, AFTER SURRENDERING?
    And with WHAT WEAPON? Was the pen he used to scribble a confession with
    a destroyed hand some kind of fake gun? Shot himself, my #$%$…he was
    UNARMED. Ever try to ‘write’ on a fiberglass boat? I suppose he did
    it in blood? ALL OF YOU. ALL OF YOU, IN THE KNOW, ON THE GOVERNMENT
    PAYROLL should ROT IN HELL. YOU are all an INSULT to legitimate, law
    abiding officers. Did you also photograph the ILLEGAL lockdown of
    Boston? Did you take photos of LEO ILLEGALLY removing people from their
    homes at GUNPOINT WITHOUT WARRANTS? Boston STRONG? really? I’m a 56 year old woman who has
    ALWAYS loved my country, and still do, but it’s being destroyed by this
    GOVERNMENT and people like YOU are complicit in that destruction. The
    Tsarnaev’s, the Todashevs… the families of the Special Forces agents
    who ‘accidentally’ fell from a helicopter. There is NO proof that
    either Tsarnaev killed Officer Collier and YOUR bosses tried to blame
    the shooting of Donahue on the Tsarnaevs. FRIENDLY FIRE, you don’t say?
    These families have been just as victimized as any one else in this
    GOVERNMENT perpetrated scam of a scandal. Watch the you tube video of the
    pink lady. Watch the video of the Brassard family ….DEMAND a REFUND. Word to the wise…stay away from so-called
    government ‘drills’. Bombs really do explode, some people get killed or
    injured, and NEXT TIME, it might just be YOU they blame, murder, or
    shoot in the face. But be sure, Mr. Murphy will be there to capture the
    moment.

    • brian_x

      Ugh. A Jaharist. Shouldn’t you be writing fan mail to Chris Brown or something?

      • Kimberly Gibson

        Why? Because I blame the GOVERNMENT for what happened rather than the patsies they blamed. Get a life and do your homework Brian. Start with one of the easy lies. Jahar’s backpack was WHITE, there’s no mistaking it, or are you colorblind too? When something is CLEARLY wrong with the ‘evidence’, I’m a truth seeker. Sorry you’ve got a problem with it. Maybe you should grow a spine.

        • Dude

          Brian hasn’t done any research at all like most of america’s braindead population that follows the news media around.

        • Bruce_Leet

          if Jahar is innocent what method was used to pick him as a patsy?

          did they assign numbers to street addresses and then roll a die to see which number came up? like was he chosen totally at random? why did the car-jacked SUV owner blame the brothers?

          • Kimberly Gibson

            Based upon thousands of comments I’ve read on this scandal, perhaps if he was any religion other than Muslim, the government-created Islamaphobes m-i-g-h-t, might question the obvious lies they are being told. Instead they are satisfied and have deemed him guilty before his trial. Did they roll a dice? May as well have. You’re not color blind, are you? You explain how black is white and white is the new black. I’d really like to hear an explanation on the backpacks. Have you read about the three other men, one being a Boston police officer, who have been found with ALL of the pressure cooker bomb materials of which the Tsarneav brothers had none. And why is the media just NOW reporting on it? Why did Danny blame the brothers? Do some research. Why did Danny tell several different versions of his story? Which, if any, are the truth? Did you know that the car-jacked SUV was being driven by the son of a police officer? Listen to the police scanner that night. Our society has become so busy with living their lives that the government via the media, has succeeded in carrying on it’s agenda with very little notice. And it’s much easier for those who don’t want their lives to be ‘bothered’ or ‘disrupted’, to ACCEPT the government/media version of whatever they are told and label truth seekers with derogatory labels, just to shut them up and turn off the light . This country is going to hell in a hand basket and when it crashes and burns, I venture to guess that more than half the nation is going to wonder what the hell happened when they weren’t looking.

          • xoj_21

            its not that hard remenber NSA?
            they can check his calls and planning.
            they have everything,
            but i think he was picked as lamb. to put the blame on.

    • http://Denverbroncos.com/ Virgil Cole

      How is Elvis, and have you seen him lately?

      • Kimberly Gibson

        Government said the backpacks were BLACK….what color did YOU see the suspects carrying Mr. Cole? You’re quite a comedian….I have a video you’ll really enjoy watching…laughed myself silly. When you’re done laughing, please do take a minute and explain it to me. I’d really like to understand what happened. Oh, and there’s a second one, not quite as funny, but fascinating as well. Since you’ll be on YOUTUBE anyway, maybe you can provide me with an explanation for it as well. You know how to do a search, right? It’s titled, PlasmaBurns Busted in Boston Bombing. Start with the funny one first…seems like you could use a laugh. But you have to watch the whole thing, the punch line is at the very end.

  • cessnadriver

    Here’s my plan:

    Try him or allow a plea as an American citizen.

    Denaturalize the little assclown.

    Declare him an enemy combatant.

    Hold him incommunicado in supermax. No visits from mom, no contact with the outside world. Maybe let him visit with the Unibomber.

    Bye bye, Joker.

  • Dustin Rhodes

    I hope he is found not guilty and its proven that he had nothing to do with what his brother did. Just so all you slandering fucks can get a life

    • brian_x

      He could have decided not to follow his brother, you know. He made a conscious decision to get involved and has said as much.

      • xoj_21

        he is 19, he could have been forced.

        • brian_x

          That’s possible, but it doesn’t seem to be the case here.

    • Dude

      They really wanted to kill him like the FBI did with their friend.

  • Michelle Harvey Perez

    doesn’t sound like a speed bump from what this witness said

  • Girli

    My heart breaks for this young guy. Not only did he kill three people and wound countless others, he also ruined his life. How could he be so stupid? He is a really cute guy. Girls would like him whether he is on a cover or not. Sad.

    • Teapartytommy

      Jesus, I hope you are being sarcastic.

  • sunstamp

    His throat looks fine when he is getting off the boat. What did they do to him while he was lying on the ground??

  • Kim Rdrd

    Holy Bible John 16. Jesus is speaking here:”All this I have told you so that you will not (be offended) or fall away (from my teachings). 2 They will put you out of the synagogues (and churches); in fact, the time is coming when anyone who kills you will think they are offering a service to God. 3 They will do such things because they have not known (God) the Father or me (Jesus Son of God, Messiah and Savior),. 4 I have told you this, so that when their time (of killing) comes you will remember that I warned you about them.

    Daniel 8
    23 And in the latter time of their kingdom, when the transgressors (Law-breakers and terrorists) are come to the full, a king of fierce countenance, and understanding dark sentences, shall stand up.

    24 And his power shall be mighty, but not by his own power (Satan’s power ?): and he shall destroy wonderfully, and shall prosper, and practise, and shall destroy the mighty and the holy people.

    25 And through his policy also he shall cause craft (witchcraft ?) to prosper in his hand; and he shall magnify himself in his heart, and by PEACE shall destroy many: he shall also stand up against the Prince of princes; but he shall be broken without (HUMAN) hand. (GOD WILL BREAK HIM ?).

    Daniel 7:25

    And he shall speak great words against the most High, and shall wear out the saints of the most High, and think to change times and laws: (get rid of holidays and try to introduce religious laws?) and they shall be given into his hand until a time and times and the dividing of time.

  • ArgleBjargle

    Ho hum. The economy is in the toilet, Congress is a failure, education is too expensive and people have their panties in an uproar because of a picture on the cover of Rolling Stone.

    • NadePaulKuciGravMcKi

      Only the PR trolls ‘working’ to defend the Boston Scam

  • NadePaulKuciGravMcKi

    Most trolls don’t have US values
    most trolls love more crucifixions

  • misha2009

    “This guy is evil. This is the real Boston bomber.” More proof that the trial cannot be legally held in Boston as it is not possible for the accused to get an impartial jury. If the shadow puppet they’ve nicknamed ‘Danny’ and the note-in-the-boat are their strongest evidence that he is the true culprit, then many of us remain skeptical.

  • Whatif

    If the “sniper” in the first photo would’ve sneezed and pulled the trigger, it would’ve cost $1.50 in lead instead of the tens of millions of dollars it will cost to protect/prosecute/imprison him.

  • Hegetarian

    Not sure these photos are accomplishing what the photographer set out to do – it just reminds me of our militarized police and our steady crawl towards an Orwellian state.

    BTW, Tsarnaev looks like a stoner. Not exactly rock star material.

    • jules68

      yes because we all know rock stars don’t smoke weed………

    • sickbastard

      Looks like the cops doing their job to me

  • Ted Nolan

    Love the red dot on the forehead. Just a few more ounces would have done the US a great service.

  • tm3545

    Too bad they cant show the bin laden photos . ITs good to see pics of the bad guys in pain for a change.

  • Mark Ebner

    The cops just published evidence. Classy.

  • Hegetarian

    “No more hurting people.” – Martin Richard

  • Joel Arthur

    Boston Magazine clearly states these pics are a “response”, they didn’t create the controversy. Would it have been okay if they used a pic of Charles Manson playing golf? Johar is relevant because he’s an alleged terrorist, so a responsible publication would use any number of easily available images that show him as a terrorist, not a collegiate. Would it be a relevant image to use a picture of Tamerlan boxing on the cover?

  • MoreEntitlementsPlease

    Rolling Stone liberals pissing off Boston liberals. You gotta love it.

  • http://www.facebook.com/james.duho James Duho

    this jerk looks good with a laser spot on his forehead..

  • Joel Arthur

    Wow you’re so far off. Conservatives are more likely to judge Rolling Stone here, liberals are more likely to rationalize it. You should check online I think there might be a course in Political Science. Judging from your understanding you may want to go with an online college.

  • Teapartytommy

    This Akbar pr**k wanted to create another Boston massacre. eff him, and eff Rolling Stone. I don’t give a crap if the once great state of Massachusetts is liberal. They are Americans being attacked by radical Islam. Stand together.

    • brian_x

      As someone Massachusetts born and bred, I think I can safely tell you to fuck off, we don’t need your “help”. And get rid of that stupid Tea Party tag — you have no fucking right to it. (The Tea Party was about protesting corporate protectionism, not taxes.)

      • Teapartytommy

        Hey brainiac, the Boston tea party was a protest of the tea act of 1773 i.e. taxation without representation. As a resident of the formerly great state of Massachusetts you should know that, but idiots liberals like you would rather make shit up and vote Barney Frank.

        • brian_x

          That was not about tax per se. It was about protecting the British East India Company’s tea interests from colonial competitors. In other words, corporate protectionism. Taxation without representation was a separate issue, and Barney Frank is actually pretty awesome. I would have loved to have the opportunity to vote for him, but where I live I’m stuck with Bill “Mr. Invisible” Keating.

          I’m afraid it’s you whose history education is defective.

  • ChantelleMoore

    The Rolling Stone cover was done for homoerotica by the editor, who likes that kinda stuff. Who cares who died, he got a wooodie over the Muslim boy.

    • Teapartytommy

      Didn’t read the article and won’t. I’ll take your word for it. Kudos for the stores pulling this rag from their shelves.

  • mikey

    I thought he shot himself in the neck and not concious when they got to him? That one with him and the lazer target on his head + what I thought i read .. confuse me greatly.

  • bobh2010

    The real face of terror is the militarized police that violated many citizens 4th Amendment rights as they terrorized the city.

    • Teapartytommy

      Yeah, I get that, but it wasn’t Holder’s bunch.

      • bobh2010

        All police departments have been flooded with excess military equipment. And they’re staffed with people who have forgotten what the Constitution says. As the Nazi’s famously said….”I was only following orders.”

    • Anonamous Guy

      Nail on the head….

  • Mic Flynn

    Dear Boston it seems once again you are under attack. Please know that America stands with you. You showed how tough you were after the bombings, again show the resolve you are known for. Thank you

    • Michael Appugliese

      Canada stands with you too!!

    • rockyroad

      Boston is not tough. They allowed the federal storm troopers to shut down their city, place everyone under house arrest and remove people from their homes at gunpoint with no warrants. They then thanked the oppressors for violating their rights. Boston should be asahamed of themselves for allowing themselves to being treated like that.

      • Anonamous Guy

        They sure did roll over for the feds…WEAK!!!!

  • cessnadriver

    I talked to someone who saw Joker and Speedbump drop the backpack near the flag of Israel. She was far enough away not to be injured.

  • http://www.anotherwineblog.com WineWonkette

    and sadly, Rolling Stone is one of the few places that still employs actual journalists who do actual in-depth stories that don’t start with talking points from Fox News.

    • Teapartytommy

      You mean like MSN or CNN, or the other networks who just lie?

      • http://www.anotherwineblog.com WineWonkette

        Those networks are simply lazy. Fox, otoh, doesn’t report news. There is a reason there are no longer Sedition Laws. But comically, if there were that entire network would be in jail. The 1st Amendment covers ALL media. Not just the cheerleaders of the right or the left.

  • Michael Appugliese

    Well one thing is for sure. Rolling Stone is in the business of selling magazines & the more hype ppl make over the cover, the more money Rolling Stone is gonna make.

  • Sunshine1011

    All I see is an incredible amount of waste of taxpayers money. Bottom line is, he was caught because a CITIZEN called him in.

    $1,000,000,000 to catch this guy? Civil liberties destroyed to catch him? And all it was was a phone call.

    ‘merica

    • Anonamous Guy

      Ironic. Once the “LOCK DOWN” (unwarranted)was lifted he was found in minutes…

  • Sherrie

    All it comes down to these were too really bad man

  • farmasyst

    It would have been more appropriate if Murphy would have admitted to what they were hoping to do that night; kill Tsarnaev . The radio feeds coming in that night clearly stated that they were going to “light up the boat”. Then a supervisor called that off because “too much media was listening.” Check around….Clyde Lewis and Jack Blood have played the audio clips.

    • public_servant_watch

      Validation that an unarmed 19 year old kid was tortured by Massachusetts law enforcement. Even worse by all the actual evidence, the fake criminal case, the FBI refusing to go before Congress and the related homicides by the FBI this kid was set-up. These people are evil and hopefully they will be getting a REAL criminal trial!!

      • Anonamous Guy

        Proof???? Love to see it…

        • public_servant_watch

          Sure happy to promote understanding of this farce. I can point you to other comments I have made that have links posted. The most important would be this FAKE criminal proceeding which the first amendment center is now taking on – I believe my comment will help them and I have all the documents and dockets that I will be sending them . http://disq.us/8e6f1f

          This is an article where my comment will show what a farce our law makers are and how the older brother being radicalized was a complete lie. Includes audio from Dagestan and leaders who have contact with actual radicals. http://disq.us/8e6f3g

          This article addresses the FBI refusing to go to hearings. My comment has picture and video attached that you will find quite interesting. There is a wealth of information- if you are on twitter I can hook you up with various grids that show the research which includes the MA State auditor assisting setting up FAKE victims at Blast site one and then most interestingly being brought to an ambulance by wheelchair as a victim herself.

          The only actual casualties were related to the metabolic, stress reactions and dehydration of the runners in an event such as this. They defrauded America and it carries to the highest level in government. http://disq.us/8e6f4w

          This will get you started. This is 3 months of work by literally thousands of people and I cannot fit it all here. There is no theory; there is material evidence and alleged crime!!

  • Tim

    No one seems to be mentioning the fact that the guy that released these photos is on scene to take photos for official use, not to take photos that he can release to the public as he sees fit.

    • MeniscusDiscus

      And why not? What’s the damage?

      • Tim

        For starters these very photos could be used in the trial to make a strong impact on the jurors and being made public now could taint that effect. Second, it shows his disrespect for the chain of command and procedure. How would you feel if photos were taken of you during a police investigation and some rogue cop just passed them out to the public? You can not say oh its ok in this case because of what this guy did but its wrong to pass around photos of someone else. He has been suspended and is udner review as he should be.

    • Anonamous Guy

      Looks like you have been successful indoctrinated into believing that it’s none of your business. Least you forget who ALL these people work for and are answerable to. Shame on you.

      • Tim

        This has nothing to being answerable to anyone. This isn’t photos showing police wrong doing. This is police evidence that this individual decided on his own to take out and give to the media. Did you ever think maybe these images will be seen by potential jurors and then when they are seen during the trial the might not have the impact they would otherwise? How would you feel if photos of you were taken and just distributed by a rogue cop? There are channels for these things. By your train of thought I should be able to walk into an evidence locker and handle whatever I want because guess what my tax dollars pay for it and they answer to me, or how about I go take a police cruiser for a spin.

        • Anonamous Guy

          Excellent points Tim. 15 years ago I would have agreed wholeheartedly. I’ve grown too sinical(sp)of “the man” to do the right thing these days. ie; Zimmerman… Even the Boston PD for shutting down the entire city WRONG! But you may be right.

          • Tim

            Well as far as locking the city down, unfortunately they were in a damned if you do, damned if you don’t kind of situation. Lock the city down and you are seen as radical and over reaching, don’t do it and some dumbasses go out trying to hunt the guy themselves, or just being a lookie loo, get themselves killed and you are criticized for it. They cast way to wide of a net perhaps, but a net had to be cast. Hind site is 20/20 and I honestly can’t say what I would do if I was in that situation.

          • Anonamous Guy

            Ironic tthat removing the lock down enables a citizen to spot the guy as you would expect…

          • Tim

            The guy went out to smoke in his backyard, I guarantee you there were people that did that despite the shelter in place order. Who knows how many more people might have been taken hostage if they hadn’t been behind locked doors. He was in this mans backyard he might have gone in his house and taken him hostage instead. The suspects had shown a willingness to take drastic measures, to kill, and to take a hostage.

  • Guest

    What I cannot figure out is why nobody has pointed out that the photo on the cover of Rolling Stone was shown over and over on television broadcasts, news programs, talk shows, internet news sites and in magazines and newspapers long before Rolling Stone decided to put it on its cover? Why does it suddenly become offensive to see this now familiar photograph on the cover of a popular magazine that is KNOWN for its controversial and provocative cover photos?

    The uproar over this it completely baffling.

  • Joanne Kennedy

    How about this – we stop publishing photos of the bombing, the victims, the suspects? I grew up with terrorism in the UK of the 70s and 80s, Here is the thing, in the UK we just moved on – we mourned, we were angry but we moved on from each bombing and we did not plaster everyone’s photo on magazine covers. .I was at Victoria Train Station when the IRA bombed it, and I was at the Boston Marathon with my 3 year old (and who says lightening does not strike twice?). Has anyone ever considered that doing this is detrimental to recovery because it just dredges up the memories and makes people relive it over and over again.

  • Chris Blair

    What I cannot figure out is why nobody has pointed out that the photo on the cover of Rolling Stone was shown over and over on television broadcasts, news programs, talk shows, internet news sites and in magazines and newspapers long before Rolling Stone decided to put it on its cover? Why does it suddenly become offensive to see this now familiar photograph on the cover of a popular magazine that is KNOWN for its controversial and provocative cover photos?

    The uproar over this it completely baffling.

    • nolaredhead

      Especially when they’ve also had Charles Manson on the cover.

  • Glenn Grimstad

    TO AARON K KRAUS,,, You sir are the person that probably is losing his job over this horrible cover to what was a good magazine… You sir needs to apologize to the families that lost their lives to a person they did not have an issue with….You sir needs to work with the scum lawyer that will try and release this person whom terrorized people that did not hurt his people nor did not care to hurt them. You sir,, are the biggest piece of crap that ever roamed this earth. PEOPLE DIED AND WILL NEVER HAVE A NORMAL LIFE BUT YOU STILL VALIDATE IT. This person should never be glorified or put to the forefront so others can follw such a horrible deed. I hope you don’t have family . as when someone hurts them we will all smile. YOU ARE SCUM!

    • MeniscusDiscus

      What is all this “You sir” stuff? You getting ready to pull out your glove and slap him across his puss? Challenge him to a duel?

  • Bruce Ramsey

    I don’t mind them putting him on the cover if they also give the Quranic reasons as to why he did what he did (see Quran 9:111, 38 and 39).

  • itsdeeedeee

    He didn’t do it!

  • Simi

    If you look at the headline of the story it says “The New Face of Terror” right? I think it is possible RS was trying to get the point across that anyone is capable of committing heinous acts…even popular college kids. Just another viewpoint

  • Kimberly Gibson

    Sean Murphy – RELIEVED OF DUTY!!! Maybe he’ll get pissed off enough now that he’ll start revealing the TRUTH!!!

    • http://Denverbroncos.com/ Virgil Cole

      Maybe you’ll get treatment one day so that you’ll start to accept the truth.

      “red dot forehead boy” is a scumbag.

  • Amy Halterman-Chou

    These photos are not nearly as gruesome, as those of the victims that were mutilated by this monster and his brother. Sadly, there will be more attacks on Americans. Since 911, there have been another 700 or more mosques built. This is the fastest growing religion in the world and there are many more people among us just like the Tsarnaev brothers.

    • http://www.anotherwineblog.com WineWonkette

      What a ridiculous, bigoted statement. Timothy McVeigh was raised Catholic. Does someone state that all the Cathedrals built are going to result in attacks on Americans? Of course not! Why is it the only time someone points to a religion as a motivator is when it is not Christianity?

      • Anonamous Guy

        Defending the religion nof tolerance I see… PATHETIC!!!!

      • Elmer

        Don’t even BEGIN to compare the barbaric Islamic Facist Terrorists in the hundred of thousands HELL BENT on destroying and killing Infidels with one or two loony christians — The tenet of Christianity is to “turn the other cheek” and non-violence — islam’s teaching are just the OPPOSITE !!

    • Anonamous Guy

      At least the gubment aint spying on them… Smart. So who are the fools here?

  • Thea343

    Sometime in the course of events of the bombing, the face of evil switched from the so called perpetrators to the so called good guys. The overly armed FBI/police/militia and the overly vocal haters are frankly, scary and repulsive. The TV image of 6000+ law enforcement officers in full military gear chasing an unarmed teenager would have been comic if is wasn’t so tragic for Tsarnaev.

    No matter whether he is looking cute or covered in blood, Dzhokhar appears as the victim now. He is hard to demonize. He’s just simply not the monster that many people want him to be. At the worse, he’s a good kid who was bullied into bad acts by a older sibling. For what we know about him, he was unlikely to take action on his own. He was much more likely to be chillin’ at a party.

    Somehow this infuriates a segment of society who just want an eye for an eye.

    • sickbastard

      Making excuses for a man, yes a man, who indiscriminately murdered a 9-year old. Classy.

    • Luka D Grindstaff

      I was bullied terribly. I would never make a choice to murder. As for “the face of evil” switching around: there are bigoted haters and there are weird obsessive fans but there are also decent people who know the facts and still disagree. No one has a claim on righteousness and the first person who says they do is the last one you should trust.

    • http://Denverbroncos.com/ Virgil Cole

      “an unarmed teenager”
      =======================

      Yeah he was “unarmed” because he had already used his weapon on Innocent men, women and children when he set off a bomb that killed them.

      That’s what gutless cowards do.

    • hus bin pharteen

      hard to demonize? gimme a freakin break. he and his beloved brother detonated 2 bombs in Boston! Killing, maiming and wounding alot of people.

      ARE YOU THAT FREAKIN STUPID?

      • Vince Foster

        yup, they are that dumb.

  • TheLoneDissenter

    Thanks for publishing these photos, BM. It shows what this piece of excrement is really all about and the great job law enforcement did bringing him in. Rolling Stone magazine can suck it.

  • Ily Michael

    The same hypocritical morons who are bitching about RS are the ones who have over-loaded the bostonmagazine.com site to glare at these others. They’re not even intelligent enough to see the irony

    • jhkraemer

      For a good laugh check what lly Michael feeds her brain..Liberal LOON

    • http://Denverbroncos.com/ Virgil Cole

      Well now to be fair, one article paints this piece of trash in a bit of a more positive light, and the other one shows him for what he is.

    • Anonamous Guy

      Another rocket scientist …

  • http://Denverbroncos.com/ Virgil Cole

    In each photo of this scumbag you can almost see him thinking “maybe this wasn’t such a good idea”!

    That red dot following him around on his forehead is priceless!

  • shades909

    All those guns and heavy artillery for an unarmed 19 year old who has pled NOT GUILTY. You should be ashamed of yourselves.

    • Anonamous Guy

      That’s a joke right? Cuz NO human being can be that stupid…

      • Vince Foster

        47% (and growing) are.

    • hus bin pharteen

      you really can’t be that stupid, can you?

    • progressives suck the big one

      Another example of govt education at it’s finest!

    • I Am Spartacus

      he was unarmed because he ran out of ammo and who cares that he pled not guilty? Aaron Hernandez pled not guilty, you out there defending him as well?

  • Paul Smythe

    Wow. Thanks for posting images that glamorize the police state in an attempt to minimize the glamorization of an accused terrorist.

    I am finding it difficult to identify who the terrorists actually are.

  • mb

    Why haven’t we thanked the boat owner, who finally could come out of his house after lockdown and have a cigarette? I guess his wife doesn’t like him to smoke in the house. I think they skipped his street. We gotta give credit to the smokers.

  • linda barnett

    What is going on when a magazine cover can go out like this
    Featuring a guy who killed and maimed people, yet if we ask,
    What is the connection to hastings being possibly murdered,
    Sites are censoring those questions? Is rs sending the govt a
    Message?

  • vertical2010

    Thank you Sgt. Sean Murphy! Your statement obviously speaks from the heart and is the most rational one I have heard about this entire issue – especially the part about disturbed individuals who want to get their picture on the cover of the Rolling Stone.

    These pics should have been officially released shortly after the incident. We need to discourage wanna-bees and copycats, not encourage them by glamorizing these monsters.

    • public_servant_watch

      Sgt. Sean Murphy needs to address his higher ups who are well aware of this farce and continue to leave vulnerable people who are stressed to the max in the dark. The corrupt in the instant matter are now destroying their own. It’s time to stop before we see suicides and hush murders. There is not one human being on this planet that would support this kid if there was actual evidence of his participation and actual carnage. THERE IS NOT!!

  • Jennifer McKelvey

    Is that a hole in his lower neck in the next-to-last last photo?

  • Jim Donaught

    The morons on both sides are out tonight. Same kid, different photos. Big F’n deal.

  • Heidi Farrington

    these photos do the exact opposite to me that this police officer intended. i still don’t see a monster. i see a sad exhausted bloodied young man surrendering. there is nothing disrespecful about the rolling stone cover. if you put it in context of the story it is totally appropos. i salute journalists being journalists and not just politically correct. there is too much pc out there and not enough smart insightful writing.

    • Vince Foster

      What are you smoking Heidi Ho?

      I see reality – a chickensh!t wanna be terrorist punk.

      • Heidi Farrington

        hey just stating my reaction at the pix. although i would point out that “wanna be” seems to be contrary to events. he isn’t a wanna be. he IS a terrorist. p.s. i don’t smoke.

      • FunkTron

        “Heidi Ho”? You’re a tool, Vince. Crawl back in your hole.

  • JPalto

    How did that officer of 25 feels about the warantless search of peoples homes even though many said no to being searched.

  • Penelope

    It’s Rolling Stone, not National Review.

    The release of the photographs is turning him into a martyr.

    • Gman79

      What utter crap. First, martyrs have to be dead; second, the point is that radicalization can happen to people who, in any other context, appear to be very “normal”.

  • jjjrrr

    Rolling Stone Magazine is clueless. It should be obvious that it’s not the fact that he is on the cover, but it’s the picture they decided to use for the cover and how it portrays him that is insulting.

  • John Davidson

    too bad there wasn’t a photo of him with his head blown off!

  • shades909

    They shot him 16 times – the whole left side of his body. Look how he can’t even lift his arm. They knew he was unarmed from the thermal imaging on the helicopter. More than 300 rounds and 3 flash grenades. He had to have his jaw reconstructed, is deaf in left ear and can’t use his left hand. Police brutality.

    • I Am Spartacus

      Yea lets feel bad for the terrorist who shot and killed a campus security guard and bombed the Boston Marathon. The only reason he didn’t have a weapon was because he had already tried using it all shooting at cops.

      • ashley110

        there isn’t even a proof of his guilt! they said he tried to commit suicide but later said he was unarmed! he had neck injury but in these you cant see that injury because they shot him in the neck after they captured him! fbi confirmed he was UNARMED long time ago!

        • I Am Spartacus

          there is plenty of evidence of his guilt are you dumb? Just wait for the trial and you’ll see all of the evidence. If you think this kid is innocent then you are the dumbest person i’ve interacted with.

          • public_servant_watch

            There is not one shred of evidence pointing to his guilt that is not fabricated by the FBI including the initial picture of him in the crowd at Blast site 2. Not only is his head photoshopped into the picture -the crowd is a complete photoshop fabrication. STOP trusting authority in this day and age – they are rogue and they are the criminals.

        • I Am Spartacus

          I guess the kid who’s car they carjacked who said they admitted to the Boston Marathon bombings must have made it up to add to the conspiracy right?

          • public_servant_watch

            No such event happened-the FBI has people that they threaten with charges if they do not do what they are asked. “Danny” who would not be seen or talk without voice alteration had no continuing threat – he was hiding because he was LYING for the FBI.

    • Vince Foster

      You are really stupid.

  • revoltiscoming

    Heres to a good officer! Few of those around these days. As for that muslim swine he and his people will get theirs….

  • lois

    Radio, television and the Boston Magazine have done to our minds what industry has done to the land. We now think like New York City looks. To view a partial list of arrest records of cops arrested for rape and pedophilia over 1, 000 pages long visit the forum at copwatchdotnet and scroll down to law enforcement sex offenders. Two weeks before the Boston Marathon bombing I posted “when will fbi agents create their next terrorist event”
    I detailed the overwhelming evidence for FBI agents creating the 1993 1st World Trade Center bombing, Oklahoma City bombing, 911, Mumbia terrorist attack, TWA Flight 800 downing, Lockerbie bombing.
    See it in the NEWS SECTION of ldsfreedomforumdotcom

    • Gman79

      I would check those sites out, but I’m a little too busy right now imagining that there are black helicopters and invisible drones overhead trying to kill me.

      • lois

        Down here in the whisper stream we know how G men
        keep busy,eh?
        Google ryan seese sentenced
        May 25, 2007
        FBI Agent Accused Of Masturbating In Public
        Posted by, Marissa Pasquet KOLD News 13 News Editor
        FBI Special Agent Ryan Seese, 34, is facing sex offense charges after a cleaning woman said she found him masturbating in a women’s lavatory on campus, according to a University of Arizona police spokesman.

    • I Am Spartacus

      must suck living life the way you do lois. Do you take your tinfoil hat off before you go to bed?

      • public_servant_watch

        Actually the latest research states those who do not question deeply suspicious events such as this are the ones who are psychologically compromised.

        • Gman79

          Oh? Do you have a link? See, I always saw “critical thinking” as analyzing things like data and evidence, instead of just “making stuff up”.

          • public_servant_watch

            That’s what has been done and there is no conspiracy theory; there is material evidence that points to alleged crime and thousands of people did the research. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5nBAvyX5hqg
            The FBI does not get to play act rescue and victim and put moulage on for future propaganda pics. They released an in whole photoshopped crowd with the young defendants head photoshopped in and they were the crowd at Blast site 2 at the time of the blast. I will help you understand and point you to solid material evidence anyway I can. Are you on Twitter? Last point-in this day and age you cannot just accept the word of authority – we are under a coup and most are ROGUE; those who are not rogue are fearful of retaliation so they just do their job and keep their mouths shut. We have to fix this country for the children and we have been given the opportunity to do so because they really really blundered this time. The truth is very painful so go slow!!

            https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BOqY4izCEAQyG2B.png

  • 373170

    Let’s be friends!

  • CommonSenseIsGone

    Holy crap, this country has
    collectively fell and bumped its head. It’s a picture, get over it. It’s not
    like we live our lives by what’s on the cover a figgin magazine. Don’t buy the magazine if you don’t like it. Wow, I am embarrassed to be an American.

    • Vince Foster

      Shut up moron.

  • candidviews

    The administration prefers glamorizing of radical Islam so no surprise the official got canned. We are so messed up.

  • NoBigGovDuh

    FIRST – This cop just generated more sympathy since he obviously forgot how they opened fire on an unarmed teen.

    SECOND – YOU MORONS ALMOST KILLED YOUR OWN OFFICERS BECAUSE YOU ACTED LIKE A BUNCH OF WILD YAHOOS LET LOOSE ON THE CITY!

  • wave

    Brilliant photos. Yes, unlike, RS, these give the story appropriate context. Thank you Mr. Sean for your strong principles. Thank you for sharing.

  • I Am Spartacus

    Those defending this terrorist, saying he was unarmed and trying to make him out as a sympathetic figure are an embarrassment. He bombed the marathon and just got done killing a campus security guard. The only reason he didn’t have any more weapons on him was because he used them all shooting at cops and dropping pressure cookers while trying to run like a coward.

  • Al

    Execute the murderer! And I am a life long Democrat.

    • Gman79

      Without due process. Awesome. Go Murika!

      • Al

        Well give him the due process and then execute him.

        • Gman79

          That’s not really due process, if it has a predefined outcome, is it?

          • Al

            I know. I am just upset.

          • public_servant_watch

            You are forgiven and thank you for validating how hard this is but that when with good sense civility and rights of another do not get thrown aside.

          • I Am Spartacus

            pretty sure the people he murdered didn’t get the same opportunity but sure give him his day in court, find him guilty and then make him suffer.

          • Gman79

            Ah, right. So let’s just have a show trial, then? Hell, why don’t we just do away with the pesky rule of law altogether?

          • I Am Spartacus

            No i said give him his day in court, there is no chance in hell this punk will be found innocent. The evidence is overwhelming, and that’s just the stuff we already know.

          • Gman79

            Cool. A priori of a day in court, we already know someone is guilty? OK, then. Seems like a bit of a waste of time doing all the “going-to-court” business, but, hey.

  • janchup

    Osama bin Laden was on the cover of Time Magazine twice. Did I hear any whining?

    • I Am Spartacus

      Pretty sure they didn’t use a photo of him that make him look like a member of The Doors. Its not that they just put a photo of him on the cover, it’s that they used a photo that tries to make him look like a pretty boy musician instead of the piece of crap he is.

      • Gman79

        Bin Laden could never pass as a member of the Doors. ZZ Top, maybe.

    • Gman79

      But nobody could have mistaken bin Laden for a hipster. There’s the difference.

    • wave

      Did you look?

  • CommonSenseIsGone

    Guess those terrorists weren’t as good looking so it was OK.

  • wave

    Brilliant photos, Mr. Sean. You have balls for posting. True, these photos provide much better context. RS is an unworthy, chickenshit, shameful tabloid.

    • Gman79

      Don’t buy it, then.

  • 373170

    The wave of terrorism around the world is the adverse reaction to the invasion of globalization, multiculturalism and blind tollerantnosti.

    • Gman79

      Leaving aside, for the moment, the tendency of globalization to lead to mono-culturalism … right?

  • candidviews

    Reinstate the photographer immediately. These photos should have been released long ago. Fire the hire ups who didn’t.

    • Gman79

      Your autocorrect has failed you: do you mean “higher ups” or “hipsters”?

  • Schifter

    NOTHING to do with Rolling Stone? If People magazine had put Tsarnaev on the cover it would have had SOMETHING to do with People magazine.

    While the article may have been compelling, I think you fail to understand the gravity of the situation.

    Answer me this: If instead of killing 3 people, Tsarnaev had killed 300, you
    really think Rolling Stone would have put him on the cover?

    What is the maximum number of people a terrorist can kill before he is no longer worthy of being on the cover of Rolling Stone?

    • Gman79

      “What is the maximum number of people a terrorist can kill before he no longer worthy of being on the cover of Rolling Stone?”

      Four.

  • virgil

    So Time can put Hitler and Osama Bin Ladin on their cover…but an ALLEGED killer is where the line is drawn? Fakyaw

    • I Am Spartacus

      Pretty sure they didn’t put pictures of Hitler or Bin Ladin looking like a pretty boy hipster. All the photos they could have used and they picked that one. They knew the reaction it would get and they are probably happy because of the publicity it’s receiving.

      • Gman79

        I bet the hipsters are thrilled, yes.

      • virgil

        so now it’s not about who they put, but how they put him? By the way….he still hasn’t been found guilty

  • I Am Spartacus

    And those bitching about the cops using excessive force… look at the red dot on the head, if they wanted to they could have put this punk in hell alongside his brother who he ran over with a car while trying to run from the cops.

    • Gman79

      Yes, a spot of extra-judicial execution is just what this country lacks

  • Ann Ramsbottom

    I am sure some people will think your photo is ‘cool’ in some way too. I stress I in no way condone this guy, but I dont see what you hope to achieve posting this. I hope you keep you job but I think posting this was misguided. Sorry.

  • Robert177

    Too bad the cops didn’t shoot that scu*m in the head when they had the chance in these shots. They could have just said “he was going for a gun!!!”

    • Gman79

      Even though he manifestly didn’t have a gun? The Zimmerman defense. Gotcha.

    • public_servant_watch

      You my dear are a very sick puppy!!

  • I Am Spartacus

    Amazes me that someone just tried to say there is no evidence he did it, I guess the kid who got carjacked by these 2 punks who said they admitted to him that they did it… yea thats not evidence right?

  • Joe Strange

    He looks like he could be Obama’s son…

    • Gman79

      Shurely, “Osama’s son”?

  • Tlost

    Like many Americans this is another case of overreacting in the short term and underreacting in the long term.

  • Kimberly

    Ok people listen up, they were not shooting at the boat if they wanted this kid dead he would be. They were using military weapons which create an explosion to disorientate the enemy. If they shot at him there would be bullets in the boat.

    • ashley110

      there were bullets in the boat

      • ashley110

        they came form outside, police were shooting at him

  • Ryan E

    More propaganda to make you believe !!!!! Yall been duped , these dudes were set up.

    • Gman79

      Ehrmagerd! Black helicopters!

      • Ryan E

        Erhmagerd , degenerate , servile sheep people who believe anything the picture box tells them!

        • KC

          They will learn when they get thrown in the FEMA death camps.

          • Ryan E

            THey arent real KC , CNN said so ! You know that piers morgan dude hes a real role model….

          • KC

            I don’t watch that junk,cnn,fox,msn,all trash….I lean more towards the Ben Swan,Alex Jones, The judge Nepolitano…real news with truth.

        • Gman79

          Erhmagerd! Someone in his pajamas who has discovered a conspiracy so complex that *only he knows the truth*!

          • Ryan E

            who knows what happened its an opinion, Your thug culture of tribalism is funny, Go find your minions to gang up on the ” thinkers” go ahead got any more great labels for me next , How about it . Waiting for more !

          • I Am Spartacus

            funny you talk about labels as you call those who don’t share your opinion “minions”… pot meet mr. kettle

    • I Am Spartacus

      if you honestly believe that then you are pathetic

      • Ryan E

        If you honestly cant go research the drills before the bombing you need to graduate the 8th grade! Come at me bro .

        • I Am Spartacus

          the fact that you just used “Come at me bro” tells me everything I need to know about you. Best of luck finishing high school.

          • Ryan E

            There again . liberal idiot logic. Cares less to find fact and would rather play the , your a tin foil hat wearer trick and get every one to gang up on , lol , weak minds are so pathetic.

          • I Am Spartacus

            and you assume i’m a liberal… come at me bro

          • Ryan E

            I assume you are an idiot , who WILL NOT research the facts I can promise you that. Its so much more fun to play ” i am a sane individual look at all the crazies” I sip the koolaid and get off on trying to get the bang wagon followers to follow in your my steps putting our simpleton selves on a pedestal of saneness right. You are so smart , so brilliant , you KNOW FOR A FACT they weren’t setup . Truth is , you choose to live in a bubble of LIES . So soak it up , let America go to hell because you can’t pull your head from where the sun don’t shine. You make me sick like all the other establishment cling ons , go suck on your bottle of government love tool.

          • Gman79

            “It rubs the lotion on its skin or else it gets the hose again”

            You sound like Buffalo Bill when you talk in the (impersonal) 3rd person. Just sayin’

  • ashley110

    look at the real facts there are many inconsistencies in this case and stories don’t even make sense! really story is police said that he tries to commit suicide and it was later confirmed by them that he was UNARMED! he had no weapons! NOW please don’t attack me saying i don’t feel for the Victims i do! but everyone deserve to know the truth. you people are not even question how much stuff don’t even make sense in this case. did you all forget he’s still a SUSPECT! he’s NOT proven guilty yet! it’s sad how people are not even looking at the true facts just believe everything media tell them to.

    • Gman79

      You can commit suicide without being armed and only using a chair, a belt and an attic roof. Or by munching a bottle of Tylenol What’s your point?

  • KC

    False Flag operation….to take more freedom….wake up stoooopids!

    • PaleoAndy

      Name one freedom you’ve lost since the bombing.

    • smota100

      I bet you lost ure tin foil hat

      • KC

        Wow…did you think that one up all by yourself?

        • KC

          You’re a silly little sock-puppet

  • Jim Frame

    Mr. Murphy should be fired. Pure and simple. A disgrace to the uniform.

    • smota100

      u are a total idiot

      • Jim Frame

        You can’t spell you. Get an education you moron.

        • smota100

          I can sleep at night knowing I dont pleasure myself to moslem terrorists.

    • smota100

      Mr murphy will find better employment he is a good person for releasing these pictures. So go bang a goat.

      • Mark

        Yeah, and Mr. Murphy may have already been paid a princely sum by the Boston magazine, to last throughout his disgruntled lifetime, no?

    • smota100

      You are a disgrace to the human race and Boston I bet you are pleasuring yourself over the rolling stone cover. Tsarnaev was an animal.

    • Mark

      Like how Mr. Snowden was fired by the opportunistic consultant firm Booze Allen Hamilton?

      • Jim Frame

        Snowden didn’t stick around long enough to be fired. He fled the country like a coward. An American terrorist of sorts. Looking forward to his eventual return and lifetime spent in a prison cell.

  • CommonSenseIsGone

    At least all the evidence points to his guilt. Florida defendants can have all the evidence exonerate them, tried and found not guilty, and STILL be guilty in the court of public opinion.

    • Gman79

      Wait, what? In Florida, he would be found not guilty, perhaps claiming that he felt threatened by “marathon runners”.

    • ashley110

      jahar and zimmerlan’s case are two different cases! there was a evidence that Zimmerman did it but jahars not even proven guilty yet! you people sure jump to conclusions really quick!

      • Mark

        Well . . . isn’t this the USA? Aren’t prejudice and bigotry and hypocrisy and discrimination part of free speech? Wasn’t slavery the backbone of the country’s economy during and after the American Revolution up to the Civil War? C’mon now, don’t be so harsh on “you people.”

  • Ann Ramsbottom

    I am afraid this photo makes him look hipper and cooler than the Rolling Stone one! He is covered in blood, has a red dot on his head which means he could be shot, we know they have just fired hundreds of rounds into the boat.. and yet he looks calm, cool and almost peaceful.
    Big mistake posting this. If you dont want this guy glorified dont post any photos.

    • I Am Spartacus

      he doesn’t look calm and cool. He looks like a fugitive who spent all night running from the consequences who finally realized how screwed he was. He looks pathetic.

      • http://doubleadoublek.com/ Aaron K Kraus

        Just a point of reference.

        • Mark

          Frankly that was brilliant of you. Absolutely admirable. Point well made. (Some might think it’s homoerotic art, though, either way. Uhh.)

          • http://doubleadoublek.com/ Aaron K Kraus

            I think some of those people spend time covering up the exposed breasts on statuary. 😉

      • public_servant_watch

        He looks terrorized and abused as a setup patsy who just watch authorities kill his brother. A lie pounded until people accept it as truth does not make the lie actual truth! You are sadly incorrect and more sadly programmed to accept the word of rogue authority!!

    • Serge Isaac Barou

      Ann, his facial expression is of a man who has just filled his pants with his own piss and shit, so he is trying hard not to spread the mix too much when walking. Hip and stinky alright.

      • Horror Unmasking

        Serge Isaac Barou, were you there to smell his piss and shit ? If not, how do you know all these details? Most probably you made you assumption by knowing quite well what would your reaction be in such circumstances. Unprove me if I am wrong :)

  • wildcat69

    The best part of this, if there is a best part, is that he saved everyone the trouble of a dual trial by running over and killing his brother as he fled the scene.

  • Horror Unmasking

    Glory to the courageous Boston police (10 000 cops), glory to the National Guard and USA army, navy and air force. They were victorious! They were able defeat 1 (one) unarmed 19 year old kid. Thumbs up for USA chief command and generals. Good planning and coordination! You all deserve a medal!

    • Gman79

      Glory! Hallelujah! Jeebus be praised! You do realize that this isn’t the Crusades, and we’re not in the Middle Ages, right?

    • Mark

      Yay! Hurrah! Start the ticker tape parades and the celebrations.

      • Horror Unmasking

        Yeah! Yeah! That’s right! With parade and celebrations! This victory must be inscribed in golden letters in the History of the USA. It is much more significant then the one over Nazi Germany taking into account how quickly our boys neutralized the Universal Evil – Djokhar Tsarnaev who dared to defy our Homeland! Our posterity will not forget this feat of arms! Glory to American Army and weaponry! Long live USA! USA! USA! USA! USA! USA! USA!

  • greg Lenz

    Too much hate and greed and killing on this beautiful Earth

    • Gman79

      The most sensible comment on this entire thread. Kudos.

      • Serge Isaac Barou

        Yeah, and it’s better to be rich and healthy than poor and ill, right?

        • Gman79

          ^ One of the more stupid comments on this entire thread, No kudos, Serge. Specifically, the US healthcare system ensure the grossest inequality since the rich stay healthy and the sick die poor. At least that’s what I think you are talking about. At this point, though, it’s anyone’s guess.

      • Mark

        But you have to ask: Where does the greed and killing really start on a huge scale — at the lowest level of the citizenry or with big corporations and government?

        If you scrutinize the Bible OT, it is God who is the biggest culprit of mass genocide. Do we wonder then why humans follow suit?

        • Gman79

          Indeed. Though I suspect that it’s organized religion’s fault, rather than God’s.

    • MikeD

      Oh yes, get me some water and let me feed the geraniums,
      some new sunglasses, I like the rose colored ones… Oops.. I said Colored – my bad

    • Mark

      That is why I’d rather admire, watch, and play with dolphins:
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NWj0-R8Yyhg
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x_R7wH-RcEU&feature=endscreen&NR=1
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=75MC2HEmpy4

      They are more human than humans. 😉

  • ashley110

    believe what you want but at least do some research on this case, these are stories don’t even make sense. HE was UNARMED when police shot him in the neck! i hope you people will look at real facts before jumping to conclusions. it took 9,000 police officers catch 1 UNARMED kid! what happened to “innocent until proven guilty”. too much HATE in peoples minds even though they don;t even know anything!

    • I Am Spartacus

      you realize he was only unarmed because he used up all of his weapons

      • ashley110

        there’s no evidence! where are all those weapons? it’s all lies wake up!

        • I Am Spartacus

          ash, wait for the trial, you’ll see all the evidence. People saying where’s this evidence and where’s that evidence, they don’t owe showing you any evidence as of now. You aren’t the jury.

          • ashley110

            we will see then how can you consider he’s guilty? i wanna see evidence they did it or not!

        • Serge Isaac Barou

          Who are you to say there is or there is no evidence? Member of the investigation team? I don’t think so – they are not blathering on Internet discussion boards.

        • Mark

          To ashley110: Please, please, please tread softly and carefully. A drone might be watching you and aiming its firing sights at you.

    • Mark

      To ashley110: Be careful with what you write or say here. You might be whistle-blowing, aiding or giving comfort to the enemy (whoever they really are), considered a traitor, and jeopardizing the national security. :-O

  • SilentRanger

    his throat seems intact in this image …????

    • Mark

      Photoshopped maybe, to look less gory and hideous? Should Rolling Stone mag have photoshopped their cover picture to make the suspected bomber very hideous looking? Would that have made Rolling Stone’s front cover acceptable? If people reply “yes” to the last question, then a double standard exists and such people are hypocrites.

  • smota100

    Kudos to Mr. Murphy but i bet the pig obama and his buddy deval patrick will go on a witchhunt for him.

    • Gman79

      Yes. Because it’s all *personally* Obama’s fault. All of it.

      • smota100

        in texas we had a moslem amercan major Mr. nidal that killed YOUR soldiers but mr Obama claims it was workplace violence. LOL that was 14 soldiers dead thanks to a moslem pig.

        • Gman79

          Riiiiiiight. Because no American soldiers have ever killed any Muslims. Ever.

          • smota100

            If you love them so much move to Theran see how “tolerant” they are.

          • Gman79

            I lived in Sudan, actually. Awful government – though a government that suited American interests – but the people themselves are very tolerant, very peaceful, and very law-abiding.

          • smota100

            Blah blah blah go to fort hood and see what the pig Nidal did.

          • Gman79

            “go to fort hood and see what the pig Nidal did.”

            What, they haven’t cleaned up after all that yet?

          • smota100

            Wow maybe Obama can find you with a drone. Dont ever come to Killlen, moslem pig.l

          • MikeD

            That’s correct Gman… they killed Terrorists !

        • Mark

          In Texas, YOU have an imperialist former President who started wars looking for WMDs that never were, causing the death of many, many brave young Americans in uniform and innocent civilian foreigners. Yeah, good old Texas where imperialist morons thrive.

      • Serge Isaac Barou

        There is enough evil for which O’Bambi is respomsible to get him death penalty. And yes, you’re right: it is not 100% his personal responsibilities – he has accomplices. Your ilk, for instance…

        • Gman79

          Yet you also decide who is and who is not guilty of *whatever* without due process? Interesting argument, if a very crap one..

    • Mark

      I’ll believe you when you can bark at Bush Junior and his cabal, too. If you can’t do that, SHUT UP.

  • MerciBQ

    So he’s a handsome terrorist. One with such good looks and charm that it allowed him to meld quite nicely into American culture. Maybe that is the new face of terrorism. Not Arabs, but clean cut, baseball loving, apple pie eating, all American (looking) white boys.

    • Ryan E

      Maybe you are a terrorist , we should send drones over ASAP !!

    • Gman79

      Great! Now we’ve discovered the horror lurking in our midst. Let’s just round up all American baseball teams, shall we?

      • Ryan E

        I demand we round up every single John Deer hat wearing American pie loving , sports loving, god fearing , moral american and just slit their throats , I mean everyones a terrorists now anyway right ? WE need a domestic force just as strong ! – BO Who you people think the enemy is , ITS YOU

    • Ryan E

      This is the pretext to anyone could be a terrorist see something say something complete American paranoia and madness, People like MerciBQ need their head examined, Everyones a terrorist , you didnt know how many domestic threats we have, the homeland is a battlefield ! LOL civil war is coming with stupid people like this who soak it up.

    • Ryan E

      Police State America, I love being in the land of the free home of the cowards willing to give up essential liberty for security , you will have neither you cowards. PACK your BAGS!

      • Andy

        Okay, okay, just take your Risperdal and go back to sleep, the voices will quiet down shortly.

    • Mark

      Hey, don’t leave out the suited government officials at high levels, who did not stop 9-11, but let it happen, or worse.

      • Andy

        Well you certainly show us one thing our country is lacking in — education and common sense.

        Good job.

  • cat Chaser

    Still cant believe it took that many coppers so long to find this jerk,,,

    • Mark

      Can’t believe that the nation still cannot see that the WTC Twin Towers free-fall demise was a controlled demolition.

      • Ryan E

        BUT BUT , They just wouldnt do THAT .. WERE AMERICANS !!!!! Invulnerable to false flags , brain washing, and political take overs. Everything the media says is the gospel!!!

      • Gman79

        Oh good Lord. *sigh*

      • Andy

        Still can’t believe there are so many self-proclaimed physics experts
        that think they have a college-equivalent education because they
        watched some fucktard on the internet. /groan

  • smota100

    Boston is called terrorism but Ft. Hood is called workplace violence thanks to the pig obama.

    • Mark

      Thanks to the moron Bush Junior and his cabal of government terrorists.

      • Ryan E

        IMO, they are all responsible for a large portion , yet nobody seems to care about their controllers, Their all puppets. Defeating their masters is the ultimate goal. Its easy to point fingers at one man , but its certainly more complex than that. A majority of these people need put in prisons for future government power seekers to take note of who they work for and they will be accountable for their actions. Right now if I was a head honcho Id get the impression of invincibility as well. The shell is cracking and we are slowly getting a glimpse of what our real future is about to entail.

        • Gman79

          That is (and I mean this genuinely) the most sensible comment you have posted this evening. Not that the bar was particularly high, but, still …

    • http://twitter.com/shekissesfrogs Iguana Keeper

      No, it’s because you’re stupid, and don’t understand the meaning of the word,

      • smota100

        Dont you have a pro trayvon riot to attend?

      • smota100

        Now I realize how Y’all elected a fake indian.

  • smota100

    Just so Y’all know here in fort hood major Nidal murdered 14 of your soldiers and mr. obama and eric “I love al sharpton” holder said it was workplace violence.

    • Ryan E

      You think our Satan in Chief really cares about American lives , thats comedy , They probably get boners every time a US soldier falls fighting for a world bank elite for their own personal agendas

    • http://twitter.com/shekissesfrogs Iguana Keeper

      Your understanding is the problem. Terror is committed against civilians, not military who are consider valid targets. It was the equivalent of an insurgent attack.

      • smota100

        I bet you were one of the I love Trayvon marchers.

  • smota100

    Mr. Murphy will find a better job by weeks end, heck he can come down to texas were we just took two more yankee congressional seats because our economy is that good and he will be hired in a second with his resume. GODD FOR HIM.

    • Gman79

      Not really, because Texan Republicans actually like people to *hide evidence*, not put it on public display. You know, evidence for things like evolution, sex education, thing like that.

      • smota100

        I will take your silly argument and raise you two congressional seats.

        • Gman79

          Cool. Let’s let a bunch of backwards religious bigots hold political power. Though that does kind of call into question the entire fucking point of the US’ war in Afghanistan, doesn’t it?

          • smota100

            We got the oil the yankees can freeze.

    • http://twitter.com/shekissesfrogs Iguana Keeper

      I’m from Texas and you’re a disgraceful embarrassment.

      • smota100

        I dont really care go to Huffingnton post where they censor people.

  • smota100

    They should have sent in Mr. Z he would have taken care of this martyr for the moslems.

    • Gman79

      Martyrs are, generally speaking, dead.

      • smota100

        Yo you are cool. cheers.

      • smota100

        fixed, dont you gotta wax Elizabeth warrens fake feathers.

  • smota100

    Is Obamas illegal alien relative still up in Boston?

  • K OH

    tsarnaev is a COWARD. if you are prepared to kill people, be prepared to be killed. i don’t think he should have been given a chance to come out of this alive. it is disgusting. that said, the man who took these pictures should not be punished. our country glamorizes individuals like this (do you know a single victim’s name?? of this event or the newtown, arvada, etc tragedies??). the victims should be on the cover of the magazine, not the criminals. shame on you rolling stone. props to sean murphy.

    • smota100

      hell yeah Sean Murphy has served the public well.

    • Gman79

      Yeesh. That’s a bit Old Testament, isn’t it? I thought Jeeeeeezzussss was a’cominnnnn …

      • K OH

        i’m not religious at all. even a little bit. too much hypocrisy for me. karma on the other hand…. its a’cominnnnn for tsarnaev

        • Gman79

          *sigh* Really? Really I have to school you on this fact of journalism since the beginning of journalism?

          Other than Jesus, it’s the perpetrators of violent acts – not the victims – who make front-page, hot-off-the-press news. That’s why books are written about serial killers, and not their victims. Whether you agree with the morality of that or not is another thing: but you would have tp be very naive indeed to see it otherwise.

          • K OH

            sarcasm makes you look like a douche. part of my point was that if magazines like rolling stone worked harder to commemorate the victims of tragedies like this one, the people of our country might remember the sacrifices made rather than the crazy people forcing them to be made. i just think that is more important to know than the people committing heinous crimes.

          • Gman79

            Bullshit. “Commemorating the victims” would have precisely the effect you despise. (And my post wasn’t sarcastic, and I really don’t care if you think I’m a “douche”, hipster.)

          • mr_teaspoon

            Nobody wants to read about the victims. Sounds cold, but it’s true. There’s no story there – they’re innocent people who showed up to a marathon and were murdered or wounded.

            By your logic, we should have focused more on the individual victims of 9/11 and less on al Qaeda and Osama bin Laden – because, after all, it’s more important to understand who those victims were rather than bin Laden or his ideology. Gimme a break.

        • Matthew Minard

          your logic is still flawed due to the killing we have done as a country there Sparky.

    • smota100

      You have to realize many Americans are looking for excuses to defend Moslem scumbags

      • K OH

        i don’t have a problem with those of the muslim faith. its people who think individuals like this even deserve an opportunity in our justice system. he’s a murderer, flat out. NO ONE should be treating as anything else, no matter his race, religion, gender, sexuality, etc.

        • smota100

          I appreciate your comment but tell me when you have heard of a Baptist bomber or Mormon bomber or even a pentecostal bomber. Islam is not a peaceful religion many of the followers will kill you in a second,.

          • Matthew Minard

            Eric Rudolph…. that guy who shot the abortion doctor…. and McVeigh

          • smota100

            Really Mcveigh was an atheist Pleasse since 2001 over 25 thousand plus moslem terrorist attacks. You gotta strech your memory that long hell i can give you aa moslem attack from last night

          • mr_teaspoon

            Yeah because your average American Christian is in a directly comparable situation as your average Middle Eastern Muslim.

          • Matthew Minard

            so what is a American drone strike that kills kids compared to these “terrorists” you speak of?

            understand that to those people there is no difference between a drone strike leveling their home and the claims you are making… innocence is innocence and religion shouldn’t make a damn bit of difference, unless you are saying their lives are less valuable than your.

          • K OH

            i’m not saying that islam doesn’t condone violence for the 100% to-the-core-followers, but i know muslims that actively rejects those tenets and work to make new stereotypes for themselves and those that agree with their ideologies, that’s all. i definitely agree there is a significant amount of people in our country who only look at things like religion as then claim that the rest of us are being unfair and prejudiced because their heads are so far up their a**** and because they so desperately need something to believe in and support that they stand up for any minority, even with no background information. i mostly agree with you :)

        • mr_teaspoon

          its people who think individuals like this even deserve an opportunity in our justice system

          This comment makes me think you have ZERO appreciation for the beauty of our justice system.

    • Matthew Minard

      “if you are prepared to kill people, be prepared to be killed”

      tell the million dead in Iraq that and the military that did it…. *Starts screaming USA USA USA chant*

      • smota100

        gawd do you work for the state department? If you despise your country so much why on earth are you here, surrender your passport, renounce your citizenship and move or you could just fly to cambridge or berkely.

      • smota100

        Susan Rice?

      • smota100

        Benghazi?

      • K OH

        irrelevant. in addition to what smota100 said, i’m fairly certain that those who sign on to being part of the military know that the possibility of death is part of their job, as is the possibility of delivering it others.

        • Matthew Minard

          right… It is irrelevant that the good old US of A exported more arms across the world that kill people everyday while you claim that people who kill people should expect to be killed….

          of invests more in the institution that kills people then the next 16 countries combines, 14 which are allies.

          This level of blindness is why our country is in decline… you can’t face that if we kill then we should be killed, after you said those exact words.

          your quote, “if you are prepared to kill people, be prepared to be killed”.

          Now go look up DEMOCIDE and ask how many deaths the governments of the world are responsible for, especially Merica.

          have fun with the research you chattle sheep fool

          • http://www.facebook.com/mr.cornelison Mike Cornelison

            As a beacon to the world for free speech and free elections, who has America stood steadfast against? Totalitarian dictators like Hitler. Stalin. Lenin. Mao. Pol Pot. Kim Jong Il who would kill you and rape your sisters if you spoke out of line. Oh, but you would try to make some equivalence between your religion of peace and the 22,000 attacks TARGETING innocent civilians and the country that targets the Islamofascists? You’re an idiot.

    • mr_teaspoon

      Ugh, god, I’m so tired of this ‘the victims should be on the cover’ BS. No, they shouldn’t. Know why? Because going to a marathon isn’t news. Blowing one up is.

      I don’t want to read about how Joe Smith woke up that morning, what he had for breakfast, where he was going to go after the marathon, etc. That’s simply not valuable information.

      I do want to read about the perpetrator of the bombing – what kind of mind it takes to do something like this, what he hoped to achieve, how he went from presumably normal kid to ideological zealot, etc.

      It’s not a popularity contest, it’s the news.

  • Morgan Freeman

    Took them a while to photoshop some evidence… I mean content.

    • Andy

      You’re a moron.

    • smota100

      surely you are kidding

  • akaldev panesar

    nothing wrong being handsome the message can be put from any one who may be good guy,a bad guy and even an ugly guy the youth is wasted wholesale all over the world it is the mafias in governments and or in private sectors.the sideliners to increase the numbers in any religions is extra bonus who dare to declare.

  • smota100

    Benghazi anyone?

  • ashley110

    radical extremists are proud of their actions and more than happy to die for their cause. In fact, they WANT to be killed because in their head, they will be martyrs that go to heaven. they don’t hide in a boat and wait for police to catch them!i never heard of a terrorist hiding and running for his life after committing g an act of terrorism. after the attack they went back to their normal lives, they could leave this country or flee out of the country but they didn’t! they faces were on the biggest news networks what were they suppose to do, not run! there are 9,000 officers are following you, whole country hates you, THEY GAVE them no choice, they were FORCED to flee, they were already labeled as terrorists MONSTERS..our enemies. if the police didn’t kill them , somebody form the general public more than likely would have. THEY NEVER HAD A CHOICE! will you people stop listening to news and look at real facts! if they did this i wanna SEE THE Proof , if they can release pics of the shootout, why can;t they release the footage of them placing the bags? what taking them so long? it’s been more than 3 months! some people are already considering him as the terrorist and he’s NOT even proven guilty yet! i believe in “INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY” he has a sniper laser beam pointed at the dead-center of his forehead but he has his hands up to surrender and is clearly showing no threat, and just the fact that the police brutality went this far is insane. all i see two guys wearing bags, walking around. they were not the only ones with the backpacks they were thousands of people with backpacks. both exploded bags were black but jahar has white backpack and tamerlan had grey backpack. it was reported by authorities that there were 5 bombs there that day(you don’t know this because you don’t pay attention to real facts).hat one of the exploded backpacks exactly matched that of one of the Navy Seals/Craft International security personnel working the Marathon that day.jahar and tamerlans DNA DID NOT MATCH ON THE pressure cookers but it match with FEMALE DNA.

    • Truth Teller

      Is that you Alex Jones?

      • ashley110

        who’s Alex Jones? no just telling the truth because peoples brains are covered with lies! i have looked more into this care, there are many unanswered question and stories don’t even make sense!

        • Truth Teller

          You’re choosing to see collateral matters as major issues. Though I agree, everything in this situation must be properly vetted. In that trial, we are going to need to know just about everything. That’s why Sgt. Murphy was suspended, this investigation is too important. They need to get it right. Leaks can destroy an investigation.

          • aliasooze

            Why is a magazine cover and a childish outburst by a police officer not cited as treason? Hey the DOJ and Homeland Security still have to weigh in. Do you really think the Gov. wants any more pics or videos out there for people to blow up and take apart?

  • Akriolla Kirgudda

    He looks like Jesus Christ in two of the photos. You’d better never show these to the public.

  • smota100

    I have visited Boston as a Texan i found the commonwealth of Massachusetts enchanting, I just hope y’all do right by this very brave trooper who took it upon himself to balance out the dirtbags from rolling stone. I apologize if my hyperbole got a little hot. Cheers to the commonwealth of Massachusettes, damm y’all gotta get less words in your name.

  • globalgestalt

    Perspectives.

    Maybe the issue lies with our idea/concept of beauty.
    Maybe because we like to believe that physical beauty is a reflection of inner beauty- (mother and child: Virgin Mary and Jesus Christ are popular examples- while evil is a fork-tongued red hot devil).
    some reactions to rude awakenings and reality checks are: denial, resistance, discourtesy, anger, and violence.
    Maybe fueled by fear.
    Perhaps we are afraid because the image looks … human… like us.

  • Eric P Turner

    your president kill way more people and hes on many covers, thousands of woman and children’s blood are on his hands, he a mass murder plain and simple but i guess Americans like seeing children get blown to bits they get off on it like the juws in israel do

    • aliasooze

      Therein lies the problem. We don’t see it unless we seek alternative or foreign media. I personally think it could replace reality shows. Maybe then moral outrage would be loud enough to close some of the illegal wars down.

  • Syzygy

    Im just picturing all the little girls that will be squeeing over him flashing a nipple and fantasizing about nursing him back to health from all those wounds.

    Whoever thought that these were an appropriate counterpoint to the Rolling Stone cover is not too bright. If anything these just make him appear more handsome with the added plus of looking like a martyr.

    • Gman79

      Picture away. Be sure to wipe yourself down when you’re done.

      • Syzygy

        I don’t think you understood my comment.

  • http://doubleadoublek.com/ Aaron K Kraus

    Not sure this is doing what they think it’s doing…

  • aliasooze

    My impression of terror is the cops and federal agents locking down a town for ONE guy. That cost all of us dearly. They wanted to see if it could be done without a major uproar. Then there is the monetary cost. We are drowning in debt. Was this the only criminal to go after that day? Freedom is a delusion in the US.

    • mr_teaspoon

      2 things:

      1) Terrorism is about causing as much mayhem, fear and chaos as possible. A coordinated lockdown of a metropolitan area by authorities is like the exact opposite of terrorism.

      2) I’ve heard reports from locals that it wasn’t a martial law situation. They were asked to stay indoors, but it wasn’t forced at gunpoint.

      • aliasooze

        LOL…You heard what MSM wanted you to hear. Over and over and over.

        • mr_teaspoon

          Um, that doesn’t apply to anything I just said.

        • juststacey

          Do you live in Boston? I do and have my entire life. Were you here on the day of the of the bombing and the subsequent manhunt? I was.

          There was no martial low. We were asked to stay inside. I drove to my OPEN doctor’s office that morning for an appointment and passed cars in line at the OPEN Dunkin Donuts drive-thru. After my appointment I then drove to an OPEN CVS to fill a prescription.

          The only areas that were actually locked down were the streets where the door-to-door searches were taking place. And even then, if you saw any of the LIVE news coverage, civilian spectators are clearly seen gathered behind the police lines.

          I repeat, THERE WAS NO MARTIAL LAW IN BOSTON OR THE SURROUNDING CITIES AND TOWNS INVOLVED IN THE MANHUNT!

  • Gman79

    Funny that all the whining is from constitution-loving Murikans who supposedly believe in the sanctity of the 1st Amendment. Rolling Stone can’t print what it likes because moraliberepublican America decides it shan’t?

  • aliasooze

    I love how main stream media just seemlessly glides from one non issue to the next. They should still be pimping out the race war after Zim was found not guilty.

  • Bob Clark

    Um…so he wants us to sympathize with the officers as humans, even heroes…by showing us officers dressed in riot gear with gas masks converging en-mass and faceless on a lone, bloodied young man hiding in a boat, while the command center suit-and-tie crowds discuss might-as-well-be sports scores over a conference table? I’m not questioning the photographer’s motives, just his methods. From a composition and a design perspective, he couldn’t have failed worse if he tried. We get the exact opposite message from what he intended: here’s the facelessness and dispassion of tyranny. Get personable. Show faces. Show eyes. And show them both worn and haggard over their next meal, not busting through some citizen’s back yard like a quarterback rush. Neither violence nor conformity does a hero make. Try “humanity”. Its the only force to break through the wall of “us” vs. “them”. And if they won’t let you publish real identities for security reasons….then what’s truly going on here?

  • Oliver Ling

    Jokes on Murphy, because these photos just fueled more fire to the real problem behind Tsarnaev’s story: its a good one. Its hard not to empathize with the terrorist, which is what makes the account so disturbing and powerful. He even said it himself, that the capture played out “like a TV show.” The problem isn’t Rolling Stone, the problem lies in the irony that we hate how a terrorist can have a human story, something that we innately believe should be reserved to the victims. But at the same time, we can’t deny it.

    • aliasooze

      We also hate that the faceless, masked Gov. locking down an AMERICAN city wants empathy. Or so the story goes.

  • Blowback

    So a couple of criminals killed 3 people. What about the criminals who run the state? Only a sicko would go and work for a paramilitary police department at this point. Why is ‘sniper’ even a government job inside the police department? Very few Islamists would want to bomb Boston if Obama wasn’t melting the faces off children with Hellfire missiles fired from Drones onto Pakistani wedding parties. They hate us because we rape the Muslim world with our foreign policy. We have a president that orders the deaths of human beings a world away by drone, over bacon and eggs at breakfast.

    • Gecko

      I have been watching a video of 9/11 recently. Try and relive the horror minute by minute.

      It seems many people have a short memory. Poor religious extremists…let’s invite them over for dinner and ask them nicely to stop.

      • Blowback

        What are you a moron? I believe the criminals of 9/11 and Boston bombing should be put in prison. Do you honestly think I am giving them a pass? You have to be an infanitle fool not to understand the blowback our foreign aggression has caused.

        • Gecko

          Yes I must be a moron. Thank you for enlightening me with you expert analysis of my character in such a short reply.

          Without commentators like yourself’s expertise the internet would be a dreary place.

  • fran smith

    There should be more outrage that public opinion can prevent a magazine or any type of media in a democratic (supposedly) society from printing a picture or news article. What’s next, burning of books that have any mention of this creeps name in it? Does preventing Rolling Stone from being sold bring back or heal those that were killed and wounded? No. Does anyone think that Tsarnaev is capitalizing from this cover? Don’t bury your heads in the sand people. There have been others that have been a lot worse whose pictures adorned hundreds of magazines and newspapers. Is that next, a ban on his picture in all newspapers. Read your history and see what burning of books due to public opinion created….

  • globalgestalt

    Blowback:

    “Why is ‘sniper’ even a government job inside the police department? ”

    A question worth reprinting.

  • Loose Drag

    Surprisingly boring photographs. Sgt Murphy should be as forceful with his lens as he is with his words.

  • aliasooze

    Breath and focus…

    Benghazi, IRS targeting, Media being targeted, whistleblowers being targeted, PRISM, Banks laundering drug money while robbing us blind, fast and furious, drugs and weapons running, the budget, the debt etc. etc. etc.

    Are you still paying attention? All of this military and police build-up is being turned back on us.

    Possible 3rd world war. The rest is smoke and mirrors.

    Peace, Love and Molon Labe.

    • http://amillennialist.blogspot.com Santiago Matamoros

      While Obama is bankrupting and disarming the Republic and dancing on our Constitution, don’t forget jihad.

      • aliasooze

        The struggle is coming home.

        MSM is pimping it already.

        On Fox…

        Steve Doocy agreed. “Extremists are trying to recruit young people for jihad, that is just a known fact. And this could give jihad another recruiting tool. Seventy-two virgins? That’s interesting to some. But the cover of the Rolling Stone? That’s delicious.”

  • Marlon van Horck

    Seems that many of you forgotten the pictures of the victims. Try to picture that instead of making a victim out of a criminal. I don’t like these pictures on the cover of magazines, because also this guy had a dad and mom.

    • http://amillennialist.blogspot.com Santiago Matamoros

      Who support his jihad.

      • http://amillennialist.blogspot.com Santiago Matamoros

        (A vote down? So, you support jihad?

        Hi, Dzhokhar!)

        • http://amillennialist.blogspot.com Santiago Matamoros

          :)

          • Marlon van Horck

            What? I support Jihad? Below comments people talk about how cute this guy is. That’s what my reaction is based on. This is a criminal, a mass murderer. And like so often, people tend to make hero’s out of them. I am against that. Please read, before commenting.

          • aliasooze

            It literally means struggle. The only time I hear the word jihad is when 15 angry middle eastern men are standing around waiting for a photo op for the MSM. Or maybe they were just dressed up to look like who we are supposed to fear?

  • Niels Schaefers

    you really think it was them? :) still dont believe it from what ive seen already :)

  • morrissett

    Boston bombing court files cloaked in secrecy – Public has a right to know – we can see photos of him bleeding, victims limbs blown off, Tamerlan’s daed body – we need to know what is happening in the court room

    From Politico today -‘More than three months after the deadly bombing at the Boston Marathon, the court cases stemming from the attack remain cloaked in an unusual degree of secrecy, stirring concern from transparency advocates and First Amendment lawyers.

    In the high-profile criminal case against alleged bomber Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, only 27 of 69 numbered court filings or orders are publicly available, with at least 42 entirely missing from the public docket.

    Across the four criminal prosecutions related to the bombing, at least 56 legal filings are under wraps, based on gaps in the sequences in the public dockets.’

    http://www.politico.com/story/2013/07/boston-bombing-court-files-cloaked-in-secrecy-94413.html

  • Finishstr0ng

    So he gets out the boat with his hands in the air and there doesn’t seem to be a wound to the throat, he then lifts his sweater to show he is not wearing a bomb. Then he falls limp over the boat, initial reports indicate he tries killing himself with a gun that is never discovered. The next picture he is lying on the ground and a medic is tending to his injuries. What ever happened to the goofy fake looking white hat that he was “wearing” in the ATM photo? I think the police officer leaked these photos for the same reason Edward Snowden wrecked his career leaking “sensitive” information. Why isn’t this trial going to be on television? Shouldn’t all Americans have an opportunity to witness justice being served? The police officer is told not to make any comments to the media and then he releases a statement?

    • IJustDoWhatTheVoicesTellMe

      Look at the picture where emts are working on the piece of shit. The officer holding the white gauze is putting pressure on the neck wound. Very little blood is seen because they wipe away blood first to get a better idea of the wound. if there was not an entry or exit wound he would not be putting pressure. It also seals the area so oxygen pushed into to him does not escape. It appears he has been hit in the neck..

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Ann-Helena-Rudberg/1440063561 Ann Helena Rudberg

    I am myself a journalist and author in Sweden and think that photos of this man are irrelevant. People that commit crimes don´t look necessarily like monsters. If that was true then the world would be easy to change. You have to look at the criminals and terrorists actions. They can be convinced of doing good things. Like the Stockholm terrorist in 2010. He did not look like a monster and was of course convinced of that he only fullfilled God´s will.

  • Serge Isaac Barou

    Horror Unmasking, my dear, why should I disprove your insight when you’re right? Of course I would – like every normal person – wet my pants in the situation that moron Tsarnaev had found himself. It is totally another matter that a normal person WOULDN’T find themselves in such a situation. It takes a brainwashed ape of an Islamic terrorist to deadly attack innocent people and then become a target of a manhunt. Valiant Mohammedan warriors like him and his pig brother are very brave when they hide behind their own women and children using them as a human shield, but not in an eye to eye fight.

  • huber@huber.ch

    Overall I don’t seem to understand why this individual is getting this much attention! Court will decide if or if not and will then sentence him to…

    end of story. Most importantly I would rather want to discuss preventive measures for the future!

  • nicksharky

    To anybody who supports this low-life and his brother who hated our country despite being welcome here (and fed and pampered since they arrived here):
    I hope that one day, while you are outdoors, you will be blasted to hell by a terrorist.

    • aliasooze

      I can’t believe anyone still believes they hate us for our freedoms. Since 9/11 the Empire is crumbling around us. The deceit that has been carried out since then is overwhelming and continuous.

      Look around…there isn’t any freedom left.

      BTW…your chances of being caught up in a terrorist attack are minimal. A false flag or black op the odds go way up.

  • Cezsar

    A picture of a sniper’s laser on an alleged criminal’s forehead only tells us something about the new normal: shockingly militarised Iraqi-invasion-style homeland police.

    If the officer and this magazine wanted to really convey something negative about the alleged criminal, they should have leaked and posted photos of him dropping the bag he is alleged to have dropped…

    Now that would have sealed his fate in the world’s imagination. And the world, not just Boston, was watching that day. What the world saw was:

    1. The tragic events on the day of the marathon;

    2. The entire security state (of the most surveilled nation and event on earth) unable to respond for 3 days despite all that surveillance, to the point that the public began leaking their own photos of possible suspects; and

    3. The security state responding to that shaming with the most overwhelming use of excessive force this side of a Rambo movie to capture two guys we had never heard of, one of whom was partying at his school up to two nights after the bombing, according to his friends on campus, without even a bleep of anything resembling fear (curious way to behave after doing what he is alleged to have done).

    What the world did not see, however, is a photo of the accused 17 year old dropping a bag at the most photographed and recorded event on earth. That’s not to say that he didn’t, just to say that that would have been a far more helpful photo to release at this time. Let’s hope the trial is more forthcoming with evidence. Oh that’s right – it’s a secret trial, just like the secret NSA FISA court.

    And that’s the other new normal highlighted by this whole affair: America is now a secret democracy where the people’s votes, rights, and very lives are determined and/or overturned in secret courts by secret people with secret motives but shhh, don’t tell anyone, it’s a secret. Just smile and repeat USA, USA, USA! Take that Russia! Take that China! No system on earth is as open, free, and democratic as USA, USA, USA!

    • huber@huber.ch

      Agree to 99.99%! in general laws and regulations in the US are slightly crazy…the structure doesn’t seem to be that open compared with ohter countries

  • wake up

    in case this video hasn’t been seen, this is a call to wake up guys and see this dangerous report::: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6-3X5hIFXYU

    • aliasooze

      I’m confused. Should we fear Islam immigration? Should we breed more? Should we fear Gaddafi while he is in his grave?

      This is interesting and I’m going to do some research on it…but I’m not sure of the message.
      We are an empire that is on it’s way out. Agenda 21 points to something closer to eugenics and mass extermination. In that scenario Islamic people are the least of our worries. Extincting the human species because the Globalist are so arrogant is a concern.

      • wake up

        Right, Gaddafi is in his grave. But watchout the wealthy Oil & Gas princes and kings. Different fingers linked to same arm. They all work towards that goal.
        ‘Least of our worries!!’,,,, When we wake up, it will be late.

  • Uchman

    I am afraid these pictures do not make him look bad at all. You just succeeded in making him a movie star. In the end movie stars come out all bloodied and most times alive; sirens, coloured lights, armour and army everywhere.
    You magazine people, yes Boston and Rolling Stones, should have just left this matter for the government to handle.

    • ihf

      I seriously believe there needs to be an internal investigation by the CIA or FBI as to who actually gave the all clear for this cover to be used. Someone working within rolling stone is sympathizing with these terrorists and they need to be flushed out. No matter what they say or what ever reason they give as to why they used his photo, there is no reason to put a terrorist on a young peoples magazine. They want someone else to copy the Boston bomber. We must look beyond the obvious and see the hidden messages in these devilish chess moves by the underground menace destroying this nation from within.

  • Gordan Josić

    America, with its terrorists, its policies, its whole decadent lifestyle makes me sick. Thank God im from europe. We might not be rich, but im not afraid to walk alone at night…

    • Janus303

      I could make baseless generalizations about Europe as well, about arrogance, superiority, effeteness, but I won’t. I will only point out that my “decadent lifestyle” is virtually the same as yours, only you likely have national healthcare which means you have a lot more cash to spend on a decadent lifestyle than I do. How many cities did you visit in the United States before making your sweeping pronouncements? Zero? That’s what I thought, you ignorant putz.

      Thank God you’re from Europe. That means I don’t have to experience your stench.

      • ihf

        You should stay in Europe, we don’t need one more Ignorant arrogant and politically backward misfit polluting this nation with rhetoric spewed from the mouth of rotting brown teeth and body odor.

        • Robert Carsella

          Man…you nailed that one!!! I’ve worked with and around many Europeans, and many of them really did wreak of nasty body odor. I have to wonder why they don’t like to bath, shower, or otherwise, practice any kind of hygiene whatsoever. Too damn funny, but ever so true. Very sad!!! 😛

    • dygene

      America may have it’s faults, but it saved Europe in two world wars. There are many thousands of American troops buried all over Europe who died to give you the freedom to “not be afraid to walk alone at night”!

      • Gordan Josić

        Not that i agree with those politics of years past but traditionally my country always sided with the german side so all I have to thank the us for is bombing our cities and giving control over to the comunists after the war… So yeah.. Thanx..

      • Gordan Josić

        Not that I agree with the political viewpoints from the past but my country was liberated by the germans and forced back into yugoslavia by the soviets and the allies, so not much to thank for there. As for our freedom we earned it our selves with the massacres like srebrenica, sarajevo and vukovar where innocent people bled and died while the american led nato stood by and watched. Im sorry, and I do know that most common americans are really nice, good people, but american policies make the rest of the world really dislike you and make madmen like this tsarnaev do mad things…

  • Chuck Lantz

    Sgt. Murphy is a prime example of why many very reasonable people don’t like some cops. His rationale for being “enraged” at the Rolling Stone cover make no sense at all. The photo was just a snapshot. It wasn’t the result of some glamorous photo shoot. It wasn’t even new. We’ve seen it elsewhere. The point of the RS article was to show how an otherwise normal looking kid could turn into, as stated in the cover title, a “monster.”
    Sgt. Murphy should seriously consider seeking other employment.

    • ihf

      Or maybe Sgt. Murphy can look beyond the actual photo and see the potentially devastating consequences if a “copy cat” terrorist does something crazy trying to get his god dam photo on a magazine and “get famous” like this other jack ass. I am sorry but you don’t know what the hell your talking about.
      The mindset of a law enforcement officer has to encompass the whole spectrum of the actions of the magazine and the consequences of pasting a fuvking terrorist on the cover.

      • Chuck Lantz

        I can only hope you are kidding. His photo was on the front page of hundreds of newspapers and magazines, all over the world. Why is Murphy, or anyone, singling-out Rolling Stone?
        And please don’t even try to lecture anyone on the “mindset” of a law enforcement officer. There are smart cops, and dumb cops, just as in any other job. And their job description does not include “encompassing the whole spectrum” of anything. They enforce laws. They do not write them, or adjudicate them. And in this case, they got a tip from a civilian and captured the suspect. Nothing magic about that.
        You, and others, may want to consider not putting all of them on a pedestal, since all that does is make the bad ones worse.

  • Guest

    explain this

  • markt2

    Many, many people in the world see Americans as terrorists.
    How many people have been killed by Americans, outside of their borders, in the past year, ten years,fifty years ??? Just like any terrorist… you feel justified, by your beliefs, that the killings are justified !!!
    ( and poor innocent people you kill, that may be close to your target, are simply considered colateral damage)

    • blindanddumb

      state sponsored terrorism is far worse then individual.

  • Tim

    the cover photo shows a man, that many people who knew him personally, had assumed he was a kind person. It does not demonize him as a criminal. it does not show any disregard for the victims involved. it does not show disrespect of the boston police. it merely shows how you cant judge a book or in this case a magazine photo by its cover.

    • ihf

      This is precisely what these sleeper terrorists want you to think. They know this is how many Americans think and they use it to their advantage.

  • Shame Fool Bitch

    He is soooo handsome. I want to marry him in prison and have his baby.
    An American typical blonde.

    • Janus303

      Wow, you signed up just for that? Got a problem with women do you?

      • ihf

        LOL

      • Shame Fool Bitch

        Got a problem with gringoes, you fucking twat!

      • Shame Fool Bitch

        I am a woman, you prick!

  • ferrarimom

    I am so glad I do not live in Boston or MA. Or Chicago. Or near Kraus. Do people like the apologist Kraus exist? Apparently. I suggest letting Kraus take Tsarnaev-like people into his home to satisfy his humanity. Have any of you met a terrorist in person and witnessed what they are capable of? I didn’t think so.

    In reading the rest of Kraus’ comments it is clear he is always right, you are wrong. He lathers his bias in pretending to be open or creating the illusion that others need to be more open, again, against his slight of hand reality. But when you clear away the BS, he is just another over/under educated liberal sucking of the teat of those of us who make it possible for him to expose his bias.

    I object to you, Aaron K. Kraus.

  • Brandon Angle

    Look at that militarization of police and borderline martial law. It is sickening.

  • Dawn

    Hmmm… Pics don’t match the ‘official narrative’. How was it that he wound up not being able to speak again??? His larnyx looks perfectly well intact to me… It’s things like this that fuel the “conpiracy theories”. And when confronted with blatant lies how can you deny them? Whatever the truth is behind this whole thing, we are not being told it.

  • dh813

    terrorists win…….again

  • Phil Harmsworth

    A view from the UK, for what it’s worth. We are always so amazed at how many people in the USA are so quick and confident in defending people like this and, at the same time, concocting elaborate conspiracy theories that are so far fetched they make me laugh. The USA population (or at least it seems the majority of them plus some very powerful leaders) want the right to arms and that being the case you should just shut up and accept the fact that shootings are going to happen on a regular basis. If you don’t want idiots, bigots, fanatics and loonies running around with semi-automatic guns then do something about it or stop moaning. Oh wait, I just realised, I must be a brain washed spy duped by the FBI and CIA into writing this post in defence of those over zealous, gun wielding cops that want to shoot everybody and anybody. Thought I would get that one in before one of the other loonies tried to come out with one of their mad theories! It is no coincidence that the UK Police force are not armed and that our gun death rate is miniscule compared to the USA.

    • Dawn

      Good thing you live in the UK and don’t have to worry about all us Americans and our theories 😉

      • Phil Harmsworth

        Dawn, I love the USA and have visited many times but it just seems that you have a much higher percentage of people than we do that are loud mouthed, cardigan eating, Government hating (whichever one is in power at that time), speculation loving, weirdo theorists that want to shout out every time something happens. Guns are dangerous – you have a lot of idiots and loonies in the USA – they can get guns very easily – people will get killed regularly – not rocket science is it?

        • Robert Carsella

          Wouldn’t it have been nice if that youngman who was literally, physically butchered recently in your country would have had the means to have been able to have protected his own life? He couldn’t do that though, and neither could anyone else have helped him in defending his life, because of your own countries bull $hit laws in which you were stripped of your basic right to carry a gun, or to even own a hand gun. What I don’t get is why didn’t anyone or anybody even attempt to help this youngman from being do brutally butchered? No, we are not allbelievers in the 2nd Amendmenthere America either, contrary to the beliefsof so many people, who really don’t have any real ideas on this matter. Go on believing theway you do though. I know nothing i say or do can show any proof to what i say, either way…
          😛

          • Phil Harmsworth

            There will always be mindless killings in any Country but literally calling for the right for all UK citizens to be armed just because of one incident is just plain crazy and stupid. Look at the statistics and no one with half a brain could argue that your gun death rate is way beyond sensible compared with the UK where guns are banned. Everybody having the right to carry a gun in the USA has not stopped the hundreds that are killed every year has it? I would argue that it has in fact only made it worse – much worse. If, and I appreciate it is unlikely, but IF the USA were brave enough to ban guns there would be a dramatic fall in gun deaths and that means a lot of people, good or bad people, would not die. If you are on the side of the law abiding people then some of those would not die. If you are on the side of the bad people yes some of them would not die either but your legal system would deal with those. The argument to keep guns accessible to mad people who will kill mindlessly is deeply flawed and illogical. That “young man” you refer to would have been killed regardless even if we had the same gun laws as you do. For every very limited case where someone in the UK gets killed (although he was not shot but stabbed) there are literally hundreds in the USA I could point right back at you. Guns, and especially mad people with guns, kill and you certainly have more than your fair share of mad people with guns in the USA. The facts – statistics – speak for themselves and if some mad man comes up and shoots you dead there will be little point in having that gun in your pocket.

      • gkr44

        To say peeps worldwide do not have to worry about the USA is disingenuous at the very least. I respectfully suggest that you do yourself a great disservice by not recognizing how so many people in the world care about the USA and the American people. As a beacon of democracy and freedom the USA’s light is dimming in the face of absurdities that contradict the right to the pursuit of life, liberty and happiness. It is a considerable sadness to watch this process. Perhaps you can allow us to comment upon our sadness without feeling that we are attacking you. Good friends speak honestly to each other, don’t they?

        • Phil Harmsworth

          gkr44 – I am not sure why you had to write that but I read Dawn’s comment as the tongue in cheek post that it was. She was not saying that people don’t have to or should worry about USA citizens. She was ribbing me about not living there, although given the chance I would have moved there a long time ago. On one hand you say that the USA is a beacon for other Countries but then you say you should be able to say how sad you are. The USA is a fantastic Country with so much to be proud of – your gun laws are not one of them.

          • gkr44

            I wrote it as a means of conveying that peeps like me (UK citizen living in Sweden) do worry about the USA, do care about the majority of the marvellous citizens of the USA and my many highly treasured American friends. I am in total agreement that gun laws in the USA (especially Stand Your Ground/Make My Day laws) are not something to be proud of. Perhaps my phraseology was more foot in mouth than tongue in cheek, huh? :-) But let there be no mistake, the American people are much loved around the world and many places owe a considerable debt of gratitude for the kindness, help and support they have received from the USA.

          • Phil Harmsworth

            Ah ok, thanks for clarifying that gkr44. I agree with you, many people Worldwide have reasons to be thankful to the USA. At the same time, the USA does seem to have more than its fair share of weirdos! Put them together with free and easy access to guns and well….you just have to accept that there are going to be a very high number of mindless killings of completely innocent adults and children. I don’t think Dawn would disagree with you either. Great place, great people…..they just have some not so great laws!

  • va5thvoter

    The grossly over-militarized law enforcement and their occupying army tactics are much scarier and terrorizing than the actual bombing.

  • Ramzan Kadyrov

    Chechens won by the Americans!
    America will be brought to its knees Chechnya!

    • Jon Elmer

      Sorry Ramzan, but that’s not going to happen. America didn’t intervene when Russia committed countless war crimes against civilians in the two Chechen wars, it won’t now either. Don’t blame America for the actions of the Russian Army

    • Vincent

      Sure, a third world country on the rise…

  • Narcguy

    What I want to know is; where are the injuries to his neck and face that kept him from talking?!? I see what looks like maybe a ear/ upper head injury in one or two shots, but nothing that would have precluded him from talking… Unless theinjuries happened post arrest. And after a cop getting shot, and the bombing, THAT would not surprise me.

  • Melissa

    Change what you notice. Instead focus on: Who is ‘absent’ from these photos?The victims. Those who risked & lost their lives to help, those who were witnesses to this tragedy. Family members and loved ones in anguish. Tell their story. It is missing.

  • Dominika

    Sometimes I think that America forgot that the only thing known for sure is that we don’t know anything for sure. Accept it that you may be wrong about everything and terrorists may be right. accept that democracy may not be the best system. Start having doubts and think about other possibilities. I don’t say that you should abandone your ideas, but you should doubt in them enough to think before hurting someone, killing and starting a war. if you do not do that you think the same way as terrorists do.
    Oh and i remind you – that it is a part of war that civils die on both sides. and Dzhokhar is just a soldier. boy with a weapon taken away from his family, with brain washed out by an idea.

  • fratdawgg23

    Janet Reitman and Rolling Stone did a great job with the article on Tsarnaev’s background. Incurious, uninformed people complaining about the cover most likely did not even bother to read the article. Nothing in the piece glamorizes suspect Tsarnaev or his alleged actions.

    • Mike

      That’s like saying: I baked you this nice cake! Sure this picture of it is a turd but it’s really good, wanna try some?

      And then get offended that all your effort is being looked over because you are the dumbass that put a picture of a turd out to promote it..

    • Jon Elmer

      So the constant references to Tsarnaev’s “cool” “smooth” demeanor don’t glamorize him ? Mohamed Atta was considered dark and fanatical even by those who lived with him. Tsarnaev wasn’t.

  • James Kindle
  • stupid_conspiracies

    fact of the matter is: there is always conspiracy theories in america, the police and other forces should make a start on being able to prove without reasonable doubt if someone is guilty to eliminate these theories, with the amount of comments on here from users who think theyre experts – GIVE OVER, you’s are all too busy trying to prove eachother and all you are doing is speculating based on what you have heard and seen, then what makes you any better than the picture you depict of the authorities, wheres your evidence to support your claims? in regards to the comments on here: none of you’s can give a proper account of what happened because yous werent there so let the police do their job ya bunch of weirdos

  • nicksharky

    This brave policeman is only trying to remind us of the severity of this heinous crime. Unfortunately, he has been suspended after posting these pictures. What else do you expect from the liberal politicians in Massachusetts?
    To anybody who supports this Tsarnaev low-life and his brother who hated our country despite being welcome here (and fed and pampered since they arrived here):
    I hope that one day, while you are outdoors, you will be blasted to hell by a terrorist.

    • Rickster Rickster

      I love the use of liberal politician. IT IS AGAINST THE RULES. PERIOD. END OF STORY. IT DOESN’T MATTER IF IT WAS LIBERAL OR CONSERVATIVE. IT WOULD HAVE HAPPENED EITHER WAS. RULES ARE RULES. jerk. you are really a vile little man who needs mental health care.

    • gkr44

      These pictures are not the only one’s showing these scenes or similar scenes of Tsarnaev.There are other images also, so it appears this Policeman has not divulged information that was not already in the Public Domain.

  • http://sinaloasurseine.info/ Felipe Bachomo

    Violence cannot be chic

  • popsiq

    The photo used by police to identify Tsarnaev, as depicted in their own, looks more like the ‘idol’ on the mag cover than the bedraggled object who had to be lifted out of that boat.
    As some less gullible person has already pointed out, about the photographic record of the Boston outrage, the backpack that contained the bomb does not match either of those carried by Tsarnaevs, but rather the same kind carried by private security agents on a training mission there, that day.
    Training for what? A terrorist bomb attack, or course.

  • Everett Bortz

    I support Rolling Stone Magazine and their decision to print the photo of Dzhokhar Tsarnaev on their cover. This is no different than any other magazine choosing to publish a photo of Charles Manson on their cover, photos of the 9/11 hijackers, O. J. Simpson, Adolph Hitler or any other person who has been accused of or committed an atrocity. It’s called “Freedom Of The Press”. I do not believe Rolling Stone in any way, published this photo to glamorize or support terrorism or those who engage in such cowardly acts.

  • Average_American

    Religion. Yours, mine.his, hers. Wow. Can’t we all just do our own thing, mind our own business, and get along?

    If people would just be nice to each other.

    So
    terrorists think that because the USA did this or that, they should
    kill the average citizen? The little boy who has no idea what war,
    religion, or politics even means?

    Yes, I know innocent people are killed in war. Attacking innocent civilians is cowardly. Why do terrorists do that?

    Please
    don’t tell me the USA killed innocent people in our war on terror. The
    military may have, but not the average citizen. And not the little boy
    who died, or the student from China, or …

    So why not point your anger towards our military?

  • ihf

    I seriously believe there needs to be an internal investigation by the CIA or FBI as to who actually gave the all clear for this cover to be used. Someone working within rolling stone is sympathizing with these terrorists and they need to be flushed out. No matter what they say or what ever reason they give as to why they used his photo, there is no reason to put a terrorist on a young peoples magazine. They want someone else to copy the Boston bomber. We must look beyond the obvious and see the hidden messages in these devilish chess moves made by the underground menace. They are slowly destroying this nation from within.

    • Ronald Farber

      Do the CIA or FBI approve the covers of Rolling Stone? Wow, police state more advanced than previously thought.

      • ihf

        You know maybe we wouldn’t have to live in a police state if it weren’t for the fact that terrorists are killing Americans. I don’t know about you but if I had to pick a side I would side with the Police and military. How about you?

        • Ronald Farber

          Continental US: You’ve got a probability of being killed in a terror attack of about 1 in 20million.

          They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety. -BF

          You sold out cheap.

          • Isabella Adamowicz

            Demagog

  • Al Cerman

    What an advert for Adidas… pretty good shape for just having survived a gunfire..

  • Nigel Spawton

    im sorry to say that the photos of Tsarnaev (leaked by the policeman) appear even more appealing than the Rolling Stone pictures .
    If you look closely there is a surreal and somewhat Che Guevaraesque dimension to these “laser dot” pics .
    Somewhat of an “own goal” by the flat footed copper !

  • Chris Hanna

    You are all complete idiots. Good day.

  • Wolf Schickelgruber

    Sgt. Murphy,
    You are a real All-American Hero.
    Shame on the police chief for suspending you.

  • Craig Austin

    Why did 10,000 police trail this guy? He was 400 yards from his vehicle and bleeding, a single officer and a blood hound would of tracked him in 5 minutes. I think that the OHS had some techniques they were dying to test on a frightened population.

  • Abbrev.

    Great pictures, they add to the glamour for sure.

  • Francis Beans

    Tsarnaev on the boat…bleeding..dejected..but most of all caught…that is what really matters damn it!

  • Bruce Boelter

    The only picture I want to see is the needle going into his arm at his execution.

  • MSGH

    Sgt. Murphy’s photo of him covered in blood makes him look like a victim, not a terrorist (of course, It’s America’s using drones to make victims of innocent women & children that turns many people into terrorists, so maybe it’s appropriate).

    • UnderGodNotGovt

      America is not using drones to victimize anyone. obama, holder and their crew are running their own brand of terrorism, using US taxpayer funded military equipment and hiding behind our country in an effort to make us the most hated nation in the world. If you don’t like what obama is doing, rally in Washington and send a message to the world that America does not support or endorse the hate filled actions of the current administration.

  • Tracy K Huyck

    St. Sean Murphy, God Bless You and to hell with the PD, they don’t deserve you.

  • Abbrev.

    Wait for it… red spot tattoo on the forehead will become fashionable

  • disqus_33bIoRPBZt

    Makes me upset all over again.

  • Ralfine

    Interesting to see all those pictures of the real face of terror. Yes, those on the desk, and the police terrorizing the populace on the search of a subject.
    We all see those pictures daily on TV. Police shouting at subjects, threatening them with pepperspray, forcing them to lay down in the mud in their Saturday evening clothes, and at the end a little sentence – they weren’t the ones guilty and had been released.
    But all these police are the good guys shows bring good money and they prepare everyone to accept the inevitable.

  • Ronald Farber

    It takes a real dick to blow up a bomb at a marathon, but to sit down week after week, decide a ‘kill list’, and send remote control drones to kill is by far the larger crime.

    It’s the crime of international aggression. “it is the supreme international crime, differing only from other war crimes in that it contains within itself the accumulated evil of the whole” – International Military Tribunal at Nuremberg

    • UnderGodNotGovt

      Would this be your opinion if your child had been killed or severely maimed for life at the Boston marathon? One crime does not diminish the other.

      • Ronald Farber

        The issues are glamourous media portrayal & big state terror having the predictable effect of radicalizing small scale terrorists and galvanizing them to action. So they’re intimately connected. Both Obama and the military are glamorously presented and as to causality, I have first hand experience of a terror attack. I like to look objectively and not emotively at what happened.

        • UnderGodNotGovt

          That might be easier for you than for the family who lost their son. obama is glamorized by a media and leftists who believe he is promoting their interests. They will find out that he used them to promote the destruction of their country.

          • Ronald Farber

            This situation is not particular to the Obama administration. Rationality must take precedence over emotional argument, it’s how you make a serious attempt to lessen the likelihood of attacks in the future. Appeals to emotion don’t work for me.

          • UnderGodNotGovt

            You are above us all…/

          • Ronald Farber

            Your trolling username tells me you’re one of those that put the ‘mentalist’ in fundamentalist. This conversation is now over.

          • UnderGodNotGovt

            I am not a fundamentalist. Your assumption is unfounded and likely prompted by extreme prejudice. It is worth noting that “mental” is also in “judgmental”. It is clear that does apply to you.

          • Ronald Farber

            ‘Under God, not Govt”?
            Right.

          • Isabella Adamowicz

            Give up to the Islamists, agree to Sharia in your country, and viola!- no terrorism.

          • Ronald Farber

            Please stop stalking my posts Isabella, use the extra time to have a look at US history and a current map of where the bases are. I’m a little sick of responding to people with a world view dictated by Fox News and no education. If there were a million drones bombing mosques all day long, it still wouldn’t be a problem for you so kindly, please, go away.

          • Isabella Adamowicz

            Oh, you sound so familiar, that’s the way of the left, just shutting people up! What’s wrong? Truth hurts? I just love your ” no education”! What a snobbism! Lets presume I don’t have an education, I still have the right to voice my opinion, don’t I? You would love to shut the ” hoi polloi” wouldn’t you ? So much for pluralism.. LOL! you remember of pluralism only when the terrorists open their mouths, then you all ears and full of understanding. Coward .

          • Ronald Farber

            Pluralism and Fox News. Natural bedfellows. Now stop your stalking, go out. Have a walk.

          • Isabella Adamowicz

            Ad hominem attacks, no argument, just” take a walk”. LOL! I don’t have a TV, on principle, so only heard about Fox news. Nevertheless, I don’t disparage people that watch Fox, or any other station, not like you, who doesn’t know that freedom of choice means not only Pepsy or Coke, but also freedom to choose the Fox news.

          • Isabella Adamowicz

            Ad hominem attacks, no argument, just” take a walk”. LOL! I don’t have a TV, on principle, so only heard about Fox news. Nevertheless, I don’t disparage people that watch Fox, or any other station, not like you, who doesn’t know, that freedom of choice means not only Pepsy or Coke, but also freedom to choose the Fox news.

        • Isabella Adamowicz

          Classical Stockholm syndrome. Happens.

  • Sharon Nichols

    Such heart wrenching words from a man who obviously cares a great deal for the men and women who put their lives on the line everyday to protect and defend the rest of us. I can only hope that his message overrides the hoopla surrounding the cover of the magazine and that it indeed has a negative impact on the amount of money RS makes on this particular issue. Kudos Sgt. Sean Murphy.

  • Melissa

    You can send a letter of support for Sargent Murphy to his employer at: Citizensresponsereports@pol.state.ma.us

    • Ralfine

      Well, yes, I’d like to see more pictures of police terror.

      • Tommy

        If that so called police terror shows a coward being brought to justice then yes… show me more.

        • Ralfine

          Yes, you need that.
          Talking about cowards, what is the US navy doing overseas? Making more enemies to keep the police in Detroit employed?

  • Albasoft

  • Albasoft

    New Photos of Boston Bombing Suspect Dzhokhar Tsarnaev’s Capture Emerge Amid Rolling Stone Controversy

  • DavidStalling

    Thanks for sharing these powerful images; They do indeed show the “real face of terrorism,” as Sgt. Murphy says. However, the photo on the cover of Rolling Stone also shows the “real face of terrorism.” The two aren’t mutually exclusive; there are many faces to terrorists and terrorism.

    The fact is, this terrorist was, at least at one point, a dangerously deceptive, seemingly normal, likeable and good-looking guy. The Rolling Stone article does a good job at examining how and why this seemingly normal, likable young man committed such a horrible crime and how he was able to hide his true self and fool even the closest of friends. The article offers insights and possible clues and warning signs that might help us better understand terrorists and terrorism and could possibly help prevent similar tragedies in the future.

    It in no way glorifies, glamorizes, sympathizes nor celebrates terrorists or terrorism. It wasn’t Rolling Stone who makes the terrorist look good; it’s genetics. Contrary to our popular myths, monsters don’t always look like monsters. That’s a true face worth facing.

    The article also reveals to us that terrorists don’t always look and act in accordance with our stereotypes and preconceived notions of how terrorists should look and behave. In that regard, I think the cover photo they chose is fitting and accurate. It shows the other “real face of terrorism,” the one that many seem afraid to face and examines how one face led to the other.

    Sgt. Murphy says that “the image that was portrayed by Rolling Stone magazine was an insult to any person who has every worn a uniform of any color or any police organization or military branch.” Having worked on anti-terrorist efforts while serving in a Marine Corps Force Recon, I respectfully disagree with Sgt. Murphy. I think it’s important to try and understand how and why seemingly good people among us can do such horrible things. The more we understand about our enemies, the better chance we have at defeating them.

    • Jim Jordan

      Dzhokhar: ‘I don’t like killing innocent people. The US Government is killing our innocent civilians. I can’t stand to see such evil go unpunished. We Muslims are one body, you hurt one, you hurt us all. Stop killing our innocent people, we will stop.’ The guy’s no “monster”. People don’t have “true selves”. He’s a hero to millions of Muslims. Live with it,

      • Isabella Adamowicz

        ” He’s a hero to millions of Muslims. Live with it ”

        The sooner we’ll understand it, the quicker the time we’ll have to live with that, will be a memory.

        • Jim Jordan

          can you translate that into English for us?

  • Neill Owen

    Using this image on the cover, has nothing to do with journalism or photo-journalism. It is purely to drive sales, PR, editorial column inches.

    Which worked, the whole world is furious about it. The owners of Rolling Stone are no doubt rubbing their hands with glee and looking for a suitably impressive image for the next cover.

    • Jim Jordan

      I’m glad I don’t live in your cynical world where everything is about money. The RS article is excellent journalism imo.

      • UnderGodNotGovt

        Maybe in your “world” young boys are blown apart by a homemade bomb placed behind them by a demon inhabiting a human body.

        • Jim Jordan

          don’t give up on your English as a second language course.

          • UnderGodNotGovt

            A grammar comeback? Impressive.

          • Jim Jordan

            You’re the self proclaimed representative of God here, so I better not quibble with you.

      • Fred

        i don’t get when everybody turned on writers/editors. they aren’t all for the money. every one of them got into the profession to pass along their art form. to inform. to entertain… much like TV personalities, but arguably more humble.

        oh that’s right… it was when RS posted a photo that scared them. bottom line, they were looking for a rise in emotion to draw people to the story.

        by the way, they posted the story for free online shortly after the outrage began. they want their story out, not the money.

        • CDODGE2

          Just as they have freedom of press, we have freedom of speech. So why do you care what others have to say.

          • Fred

            it’s just an honest discussion. i’m here for the same reason most others are, to make sense of this situation and inform myself/make my opinion known.

          • CDODGE2

            I respect that. Sorry

          • Fred

            personally, it helps me completely formulate my opinions by typing them out. no apology needed, but accepted.

        • Jim Jordan

          well said, Fred. It’s not about money.

          • Isabella Adamowicz

            ” There is no such thing as bad publicity.’ it is about money and controversy, these people are immoral. Their thoughts should have been about the victims and their relatives, but they are too cynical, and far too gone as human beings to l take a moral stand.

          • Jim Jordan

            It must feel really really good to be so much more moral than everyone else and to know exactly what’s moral and what isn’t. Like new Israeli settlements in Occupied Palestine. Where do they fall on your moral spectrum?

          • Fred

            i’m sorry, but we, as a culture, do care about how people take the wrong path. hell, there’s an entire profession based on the study of it, criminology. it’s something we need to take a look at. we know about the victims. we mourned their deaths and their injuries, and let them get on with their lives, if they still have them. now, we address why this happened. it’s not glorifying, it’s studying. and the cover is not glorifying, it’s presenting the fact that somebody that looks like an assimilated, honor-roll making, wrestling team captain can go so terribly wrong. that’s what we need to look at.

      • Neill Owen

        Your review of the article will no doubt be fantastic. Unfortunately for you, the whole world is not discussing the article. We’re all discussing the decision to use Tsarnaev’s image as a cover image.

        Mirroring the semi-messianic pose struck by Jim Morrison, who was one of the pin-ups for the counter-culture revolution of the late 60s early 70s, strikes an uneasy chord with many. Is the use of this image portraying Tsarneav as some kind of figurehead for the disenchanted youth of today. Is it being used as a call-to-arms for every bedroom bomber?

        Because from where Im standing, it certainly looks like RS magazine are glorifying him, either directly or indirectly. This is poor taste and a poor choice. Print the article, sure, we have a free press, and print a full page of the image with it. Fine. But dont use it as a Cover image.

        Excellent journalism it might be Jim. But you’ve missed the point of my argument. Maybe I wasn’t clear that. Oh, and sadly the world is run by money, and there are cynical motives behind every business decision. Wake up.

        • Jim Jordan

          I suppose you would argue that I have some “need” to avoid what seems to you like the obvious “truth” that our world is “run by money”. Maybe so. But I do know for a fact that my life and the lives of my friends are NOT “run by money”. I rarely think about money. You should try it. it’s nice. :)

          • Neill Owen

            You’re going off-topic there Jim. Did you read anything of my reply to you previously? or just last 2 sentences. Either way, this (and subsequently you) are a waste of my sunny Friday afternoon.

            Have a great weekend Jim.

          • Jim Jordan

            Gee, thanks Neill. You, too. :)

  • CDODGE2

    Regardless of Dzhokhar’s religion, he killed four people and severely injured hundreds more and is a terrorist by every sense of the word. If you believe that Rolling Stone didn’t pay for his “selfie” then you live in a bubble. They clearly are supporting a terrorist by doing that. And, the city of Boston was not shut down that day based on a lucky hunch, so give me a break with this “innocent until proven guilty” crap. Those that think this was a big conspiracy should be living up north in a cabin like the crazy people you are. I believe in and understand the justice system and he will have his day in court and all of you that support this terrorist can sheepishly apologize to the victims and families of this tragedy.

    • ihf

      Thank you

    • Fred

      the photo is public domain. we’ve seen that pic on every news station, so i guess you’re against them “supporting” a terrorist too? no, none of them paid for the photo. was put up on social media for free.

      but I’m with you on us knowing he did it, but he still needs a trial. he’s still an American citizen, and he still has his rights… although at this point, the trial is merely a formality.

  • katarina broman

    Boycott the Rolling Stone Magazine!

    • spacemonkey82

      boycot knee jerk haters who assault journalists who want to dig deeper into a story.

      please go back to watching honey boo boo

      • katarina broman

        What is honey boo boo? Has to be something you are familiar with though.

    • Fred

      country full of pu**ies.
      EEK! I CAN’T SEE HIS FACE! IT’LL MAKE ME INTO A TERRORIST!

  • Jim Jordan

    Dzhokhar looks maybe even hotter all bloodied up than he does in the Rolling Stone photo.

    • ihf

      Maybe you should go join him in Hell, there may be room left.

      • Jim Jordan

        could be fun!

        • ihf

          You and him could take turns fist fucking Satan’s asshole!

          • Jim Jordan

            Obviously a scene that excites you. Isn’t Massachusetts supposed to be gay-friendly?

          • ihf

            You would know

          • Jim Jordan

            You don’t like gay people?

          • CDODGE2

            Jim, you are solely here to aggravate people and you are ridiculous. if you have nothing intelligent to say, which is what it sounds like, you should find a gay chat room.

          • Isabella Adamowicz

            We don’t like people who make fun of tragedies- be they straight or gay.

          • Jim Jordan

            own it. you LOVE so-called “tragedies”. your outrage, your smug sense of moral superiority, your connection with “big events”: that’s what it’s all about for you. but hey! it’s a free country. I’m going back to finish an article on Obama’s latest remote control drone murders of Muslims in Yemen.

  • Sachtjen James

    Unbelievable that with all the overwhelming evidence against this terrorist that some think he even deserves a day in court. He should have been shot on sight like a rabid dog. He and his brother showed their victims no mercy and that is exactly what he should have received.There are more then enough officers that can identify this loser as the one shooting at them to remove any doubt of his innocence. Countless lives were destroyed and too many ended.

    • http://facebook.com/dballing/ Derek Balling

      People believe he deserves a day in court, because that’s how this country works. That’s what – ostensibly – makes us better than other places. That people are in fact “innocent until proven guilty, by a jury of their peers, in a court of a law”.

    • Fred

      pssssst… you’re totalitarianism is showing.

      • Isabella Adamowicz

        “Those, that are kind to the guilty, will eventually became cruel to the innocent”. And that is exactly what is happening.

        • Fred

          giving the man his civil rights is not being “kind.” it’s being American…. the constitution guarantees them.

          • Isabella Adamowicz

            I’m not against putting him on trial, I’m against glamorizing and nearly excusing him, like you do, because of the grievances that he might have. Also as an American citizen, shouldn’t you feel outraged that he betrayed your trust? When one becomes a citizen he swears loyalty to the US of A, and promises to uphold the laws of USA. And did he? You gave this family a refuge, you gave them good standard of living, education, for 15 years American taxpayers looked after that family. And these are the rewards? Obviously, the lesson should be not to give refuge to those people. But the PC brigade will not let it happen. Don’t profile at your peril.

  • Dave

    Man everyone needs to stop with all this already. Wanna know why terrorists do what they. Look at all this bickering. Its what they live off of… Personally I believe both of the brothers were rouge agents. Another fact that has been released and quoted by the FBI that the Boston and alondon Marathons are used as trainning grounds. Dont you find that odd to start with? They have proven that seals were on site in Boston with the same back packs as the bombers. Answer me this. Why would Navy Seals not stop them if they knew of them???

    • Jim Jordan

      you’re nuts, man.

      • Dave

        How am I nuts when there are photos of navy seals in boots, fatigue pants, black windbreaker with the punisher logo, hat with the same logo and sun glasses???

        Ever watch the show 24? That shows you how real terror strikes within the government …

        • Jim Jordan

          do you have any idea how nuts all of that sounds?

          • Sean McMahon

            It doesn’t sound nuts at all. Pay attention and see it for yourself.

          • Fred

            see above, you nut.

        • Fred

          those weren’t seals. they were a National Guard Civil Support team…. and those photos were taken after the blasts, while they were studying the blasts. oh, but you won’t believe that….. because it’s not interesting enough and doesn’t reaffirm your belief that the Jews are behind everything bad that happens…

          and lmao @ your notion that 24 should be everyone’s source for gov’t corruption.

          • Dave

            1) Civilian teams do not wear the punisher logo only Navy Seals do get that straight. I have a friend who wears his hat all the time and nods when someone on the Seals is near him to say him so they do not bring attention to themselves…

            2) Were do the Jews have anything to do with this at all????

            3) We have so much corruption that voting to me is a waste of time cause at least 75% of all the Politians everywhere are corrupt…

            Apparently you are soo naive to believe what the government wants you to believe… That is why this country is in the turmoil it’s in…

            Everyone believes what’s on the surface and turns away from the truth. Trust me in a few years the government we have now will no longer be what it is… We are lucky the so called freedoms everyone wants to hand over for a little more security that any are left…

            There is no such thing as innocent till proven guilty any more. The media spins everything to make it fit what they want…

            Everyone needs to take a few minutes and just relax and not fight based on emotion… Fight with facts and that is how you get somewhere….

    • ihf

      Wow and your one of the people the US protects, what a fucking waste of time and money

    • Sean McMahon

      Your right dude. It’s obvious. Anyone who says otherwise is nuts.

  • SharpToothResurrected

    I have never purchased a single issue of Rolling Stone magazine and see absolutely no reason to start now.

  • Gigi Looper

    The head honchos at Rolling Stone magazine need to have their heads examined. Of course the only reason this bomber’s face is plastered on the magazine’s cover is to line their pockets with your money, Glamorizing Tsarnaev (and others like him) is what sells. Rolling Stone publishing his photo as if he were a superstar just adds to the controversy surrounding this murderer causing the demand for this issue to be astronomical. It’s the same as when Rolling Stone published photos/articles about controversial celebrities. The only difference is they’ve gone from focusing on an honest to goodness celebrity to a terrorizing murderer. Sad thing is that many people will purchase this issue in the hopes of getting a piece of Rolling Stone’s “pie”. They all should be ashamed of themselves. If Rolling Stone wanted to cover this story and include Tsarnaev’s photo they could have at the very least had a picture of the police officer who lost his life while pursuing this dangerous criminal as the cover photo. Honoring that officer would have been the right thing to do. Shame on them and those who purchase this magazine.

  • Ebert McFartington VII

    Tsarnaev is a national hero!

    • CDODGE2

      You are a TERRORIST!!!

    • Jim Jordan

      of the Boston McFartingtons? Say hello to Aunt Sadie for me, please.

    • ihf

      Oh you can have him back, only with a few hundred pounds of C4 packed up his ass.

    • Walter Bellhaven

      in which nation ?

    • Isabella Adamowicz

      Burn in hell!

  • fundolly1fun

    How many young people will actually read this..Think about it

  • http://0xtc.com/ Tanin

    Trial by media, much?

  • lynnfirefighter

    I agree with the State Police officer 100%. To get on the cover of Rolling Stone magazine I thought you had to do something newsworthy in the music industry, not kill, maim and terrorize innocent men, women and children while they are watching a sporting event. The public should boycott Rolling Stones magazine for this issue and future ones as to not reward them for their disgusting choice of magazine cover. They have freedom of speech and we have the freedom to spend our money on organizations who don’t glamorize terrorists!

    • http://facebook.com/dballing/ Derek Balling

      Manson was on the cover of Rolling Stone years ago. Not much different, to be honest.

      • John Michael Taylor

        Manson was tied directly to rock culture. The picture isn’t a glam shot. I was 9 in 1979, so I don’t know the cultural context of putting murderers on magazine covers, but in 2013 putting terrorists on covers, and making them look good, obviously isn’t culturally acceptable to the vast majority of US citizens.

        • http://facebook.com/dballing/ Derek Balling

          I don’t know that this kid’s picture is all that “glamorous”. i think there *is* value, though, in recognizing that the entirely normal looking kid next door, who you’d have no problem letting your daughter go out on a date with, or would see hanging out on a college campus … can be a terrorist.

          That is, in fact, of journalistic value.

          To be clear, I think RS did this entirely for controversy, and it’s paying off in spades for them, but their “motives” are largely irrelevant.

          • JJnTX

            I think the journalistic value lies in putting pictures in the paper showing the absolute destruction they caused and the weeping families who needlessly lost loved ones due to this MONSTER’S actions.

          • Shain Eighmey

            It is a glam shot. Honestly, just looking at the cover I figured it was some new rockstar I hadn’t seen yet, then of course I read the cover.

            It’s a very good story, but a very poorly chosen cover considering the subject material. It looks like a reward.

  • Judderson

    Maybe he and the Obama’s can catch a Beyonce concert together. He’s such a fuzzy bear..

  • Joel Malard

    Context is important and an image like this front page cover is a means to start a discussion not to close it, If it weren’t so the human race wouldn’t have had to invent languages, songs, poetry and eventually the rule of law. For me this image reminds me of the cathartic documentary by Daris Long and Melvin Bledsoe : “Losing our Sons.”

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/12/13/losing-our-sons-documentary_n_2294471.html

  • spacemonkey82

    this reminds me of bill maher who lost his show after 9/11 because he said the hijackers were not cowards.

    have any of you haters even read the article? you should resist the reptilian urges in your brain and read the article. you might learn a thing or two.

    • UnderGodNotGovt

      RS could have published the article without putting this monster’s picture on their cover. They chose to court controversy because they felt it would benefit their bottom line. This has nothing to do with “good journalism”.

    • TrueBlue73

      It’s not really about the article, which is quite good. It’s about placing him on the cover that most find appalling.

  • Jack Nimble

    Interesting how the police photographer makes zero reference to civilians of any kind except for the families of the military / police etc. What about the civilians killed and maimed in by the attack? The state police are so insulated, self-righteous, coddled and highly paid it’s absurd. Their only real product is handing out speeding tickets and protection-racketing with unneeded police details on construction sites and elsewhere. Massachusetts would be far better off if they were disbanded. As for catching the once-in a generation terrorist, I’ll take my chances with the military, FBI and local police.

  • Jay T

    The reason why there’s so much fuss over this is that Rolling stone magazine cover has traditionally been synonymous with fame and success. If you’re on the cover, it seems to spell out fame and glamor. But people seem to forget that it’s only a magazine and not in any way a barometer for likeness of the person in society. Charles Manson was featured on the magazine for pete’s sakes. Give it a rest people. It’s only a magazine.

    • ihf

      Baaaaa Baaaaa please tell us more sheep

    • Jim Jordan

      a GREAT magazine.

    • CDODGE2

      Charles Manson was on the cover in 1970. We live in a different time now and maybe it was tasteless in this day and age to use and pay for the photo they did of a suspected terrorist.

    • igotnothin

      …to you. It’s only a magazine; only a picture, to you. To others, it’s much, much more. Acting above it all and telling people to “give it a rest” is not helping, and your comment shows how gravely you missed the point. Your stated reason is not the reason people are upset.

  • LOUIE LAMOORE

    This is typical America. Chest pounding John Wayne wannabe BS actions. Applauding 5K cops armed to the teeth shooting countless rounds at some unarmed kid who went bad. And to applaud this Murphy scum is outrageous beyond words.

    America is so spoiled and arrogant what it needs is a massive depression whereas the wealthy get tanked first. Then we’re back to everyone is like everyone else. Then maybe this country can get back to be a good place to live.

    • PuppetMaster2

      Seems you forgot to add he killed 4 people, wounded several more, ran over and killed his brother, shot a cop, had a car chase where he was throwing bombs and materials out the window. As John McClane would say, “Yippe-ki-yay Mothe…”

    • JJnTX

      He killed a kid for absolutely no reason, “Louie”.

      And no, we don’t need a depression. Move to Iraq if you’d like to experience a depression and you think this kid was harmless.

      • charles Norman

        All terrorists kill for a reason, whether misguided or not. A quote for you to think on is “one man’s freedom fighter is another man’s terrorist”.

      • Ralfine

        Is that why you send your kids to Iraq? And Afghanistan?

    • DLK1124

      If you live in America, you can leave whenever you want! I am sure there are much better countries out there that will allow you to voice your opinions how ever you want. Maybe Venezuela, Russia, or any lovely country in the Middle East.

      Why don’t you contact all of the victims who have lost body parts and sustained life-altering injuries and tell them how this country sucks because they used so many officers. Call the families of the ones who died because of this scum bag and his brother and tell them the same thing.

      No one is forcing you to stay in this country!

      • Ralfine

        What happened to innocent until PROVEN guilty?

        PROVEN in a court of law. With EVIDENCE?

    • DrColostomy

      GRT THE PHUC OUT! A$$WIPE!

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Trisha-Doherty/100002199371329 Trisha Doherty

      In other words, you, louie lamoore, are an abject failure and if only everyone else would fail too, you would not feel so inadequate anymore.

    • TrueBlue73

      Considered armed and dangerous. Why? Because he was armed to the teeth during their encounter hours before his capture!

  • rustyoldjeep

    Do a little digging and I bet you find these two scumbags were or are on a federal payroll somewhere. It was way too easy how the imcompetants found them. DHS, FBI, CIA, NSA, etc, some fool has got the pay stubs sitting in his little basket.

    • JJnTX

      They were on welfare.

    • adrshepard

      Yeah, and it accomplished so much for the CIA. They really wanted that 8-year-old kid dead.

    • rustyoldjeep

      Wow, you dissenters have a lot more faith and trust in the New America government than I do.

    • DrColostomy

      Obama’s muslim payroll!

  • KCBarbieQ

    As human beings, it’s tragic when someone falls off the wagon of great potential. I have no problem whatsoever for what Rolling Stones mag did. I love Boston,and I hurt for all of the families who were involved in the bombings. It was a horror I hope we never see again. But part of our problem is we are so quick to complain, so quick to pass judgement. When I got online this am, I immediately saw the usual Obama-bashing. We need to find kindness and understanding,and spit in the face of hatred.

    • JohnQAmerica

      Wow…you’re a special kind of “stupid”….huh?

      • KCBarbieQ

        Sure, John. Tell that to my degree. And you’re a bored little cyber bully. Bet that warms your heart to talk to a grandmother that way,huh? Have a lovely day…and I’ll be sure and pray for you!

        • civilwarsoon

          Wow your “degree” had auditory capabilities? in addition to your abject stupidity and mental infirmity; it seems you are more than “1 kind of stupid” Why not take have your degree and obammy’s fake degree go out on a date night? Go die alone granny, you POS. I spit ion the face of your and obama’s hatred of America.

          • Fred

            lol you’re a real Patriot. insulting and “spitting in the face” of a grandma because her beliefs are different than yours. go back to soviet russia you brainwashed dipsh**

          • civilwarsoon

            thankfully, it won’t be long before Americans put bullets in her and your ilk instead, you commie POS

          • Fred

            it won’t be long before you put a bullet in yourself.

          • DrColostomy

            Put a bullet in each other,you two clowns.

          • Ralfine

            Need more guns? Buy some.

            Maybe I really should go into the gun and ammo business. Good money.

        • JohnQAmerica

          Wait…I should show respect or…what, PITY to a Grandmother for that reason only ??? And I’ll raise one degree against yours. My Criminal Science, for your….what ?

          • KCBarbieQ

            Just the fact that people really think it’s perfectly ok to get on a computer and hatefully attack one another for their freedom to comment may JUST be why things are fd up,Dear. I hear your mother calling.

          • JohnQAmerica

            Doesn’t it just suck when you’re “one upped” online ? Don’t worry…you’ll get over it.

          • KCBarbieQ

            I deleted what I said earlier. I really have no time to talk to those who thrive on negativity. It’s childish,and its not what I was taught. growing up(during the ice ages…)

          • Guest

            I tried to delete this whole conversation. I was busy working when you were still in here with your childs play, John. My degree is none of your business. One upped? Really? Raise 5 children, travel the world, earn a degree at 50,and we’ll talk. I tried to say that the hatred in this country is PART of the problem,but you just give proof it exists. Sad. Good bye.

          • JohnQAmerica

            Really ? You still want to play this damn game ? Sheesh…Ok. Joined the US Navy at 17 years old. Honorably Discharged in 1982. I have a degree, you’re lying about yours. Raised 5 children as well, 3 have been HR Students. Been married to the same girl for over 25 years. Home owner. Little League Coach of the YEAR in 1999… bla bla bla bla BLA….face it. People are NOT going to keep remaining silent over obvious injustice and our lack of holding our so called “elected officials” accountable….If I don’t like it…I’m GOING to speak up. And I sure as hell don’t like liberal scumbags like you…Yes, you are SAD. And you’ve been schooled, online no less.

          • Guest

            100 credit hrs earned. One degree,close to 2nd. No lie. Real American, John…go to my website if you don’t believe me…distantmoonstudios.com. I do have a right to speak.

      • Fred

        you’re a special kind of disagreeable…. you know, the kind that doesn’t have a point of their own to make, only shoots down the other side with insults. moron.

        • JohnQAmerica

          Like you just did ? Wow…I didn’t anyone could be this dumb !

          • Fred

            i’m glad SOMEBODY got the sarcasm.

            oh wait, you didn’t.

        • sandlapper

          Hey you can say “moron” but I can’t say “idiot”!

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Trisha-Doherty/100002199371329 Trisha Doherty

      I spit in the face of obama supporters, close enough?

      • Fred

        you’ve already been brainwashed to separate our country in two. you’re contributing to the downfall of America with your polarizing thoughts. congratulations.

  • JJnTX

    RS is garbage.

  • Catman2

    You

    • Fred

      good input

  • Aethera Nobis

    Let’s try and not fall into “two minutes of hate” and ask the question: If the police fired literally hundred’s of shots into the boat (they did), then isn’t the reason why he is bloodied is from them? In fact I would surmise they planned on killing him (like the FBI killed the “accomplice” to his brother down in Orlando with 6 shots to the body and 1 to the head while being “questioned”. Rolling Stone used that particular image for their own purpose, and has nothing to do with guilt or innocence of an ALLEDGED terrorist (We are still the nation that believes in every man’s day in court, right?)…I would only ask the Boston Police Department why they have apparently classified the photo’s of the two brother’s dropping their backpacks at the site of the bombings – why is that so secret? Is it because they don’t want to show it or they don’t have it? (Remember, the initial story was this kid had a gun in the boat but that changed later; however it didn’t stop them from firing those hundreds of rounds, some of which you can clearly see in this photo)…there is a LOT of questions about this case, but alas, I doubt very seriously we will ever know what really happened…and btw – his hair does not appear to be shortened like it is now, and remember the FBI said he cut it BEFORE the shootout, so don’t believe everything you read…use the common sense that God gave you.

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Trisha-Doherty/100002199371329 Trisha Doherty

      Alleged..true..and zimmerman is acquitted…I hope you respect that as well

      • Ralfine

        He is acquitted after all courts of appeal acquit him.

        • http://www.american-partisan.com/ Tim Rollins

          You asswipe..acquittal is FINAL…END OF DISCUSSION. PERIOD…

      • Aethera Nobis

        As a matter of face I very much respect the decision of those jurors, whether the outcome would’ve come out differently or the way it did…at least HE got a trial by his peers…do we really believe this kid stands a chance in Hades at a fair trial? Time will tell…

    • Fred

      i think if you take a look below, we apparently aren’t the nation of civil rights anymore. so many people trying to kill him now and get it over with.

      • Aethera Nobis

        I do not fantasize that civil rights are alive and well, but I hope that sane and rational people can avoid “1984”-esque affectations and look at this for what it is…a lot of suspicious behavior on the part of the government agencies that shift the suspicion back to them…

  • http://starkalexandre.tumblr.com/ ALEXANDRE STARK

    BRAVO. My condolence and great respect for the family of missing.

  • Benny_1337

    I love how dumb American’s can be. There is no footage of them actually planting a bomb but images of Craft Paramilitary with the same backpack moments before and no backpack after the first explosion.

    Bottom line is you bitch and moan about terrorist, yet you have far more homegrown terrorist living as your neighbours – who are American’s, no foreigners. Also, you government is a well known terrorist – Even millions in your country see this.

    • DLK1124

      If you hate Americans so much, no one is forcing you to live here. If you don’t live here, than mind your own business and worry about where you live.

    • Fred

      don’t call people dumb while adding an unneeded apostrophe into their name….

    • DrColostomy

      Nice Tin Foil hat there, jerkoff.

  • Zaramoku

    Tsarnaev may be a monster but what is more monstrous and scary is that a police sergeant violated the rules or even the law in expressing his anger over the action of a news magazine. We are gradually becoming a nation of vindictive people, instead of a nation that adheres to the rule or outcome of the law.

    If this sergeant was not authorized to release these bloody pictures, then his action, in releasing them, is vintage vigilantism, which must be discouraged irrespective of how objectionable and despicable RS’s cover of Tsarnaev is. Enough of this vigilantism, folks.

    • F_150

      vigilantism?? You better go back to school and get educated…How about the bloody images of the victims was that vigilantism.
      ?

      • Zaramoku

        You need to understand what is being discussed before responding with arrant stupidity and ill-educated street urchin-like vocabulary. Vigilantism refers to the conduct of the police sergeant in releasing pictures that he was not authorized to release. Without a doubt you would be as idiotic as he was in ignoring the rules.

    • DrColostomy

      I wish they were pictures of this little worm DEAD! Guts blown out of him.

      • Ralfine

        Yes, that’s how we know Americans.

        That’s why America is loved all over the world.

        • http://www.facebook.com/people/Trisha-Doherty/100002199371329 Trisha Doherty

          F u c k the rest of the world

          • Fred

            yeah, it’s not like they’re related to you or anything.

        • DrColostomy

          If America is so hated..why the fug do we have to build a fence around it to keep the swarms of foreigners OUT????? I WISH all the people that hate America would just leave!! Ahh…..a day without liberals, illegal aliens and democrats!!

          • Ralfine

            Do you really have to or is it just good business for fence manufacturers?

  • Bradford

    Google: “Craft International”, and see what comes up for “images”…
    ‘Nuff said…
    Some of you people sound like you’d be happier in Saudi Arabia, where folks are EXECUTED in PUBLIC…
    …is that what you REALLY WANT…???…
    …God help us all…

    • Ralfine

      Saudi Arabia is a close friend of the USA.
      Any more questions?

      • Carrot Rabbit

        Really, and where do you think Bin Laden and his gang of hijackers came from. The king is semi friends only because he gets our greenbacks for his oil and that allows him to keep his thrown.

        • Ralfine

          They came from Saudi Arabia and were trained by the CIA.

          Didn’t you see the picture of them meeting Bush Sr.?

        • Ralfine

          They came from Saudi Arabia and were trained by the CIA in Afghanistan. America even supplied the weapons in the fight of Bin Laden against the Soviet Union.

      • Bradford

        Yes, Ralfine, tell us EVERYTHING you know about Saudi Arabia…that should be about 2 sentences…
        You do know that the Bin Laden family is one of the biggest, most powerful of the House of Saud…???…
        Yes, *THAT* Bin Laden family…you baaaah like a SHEEPLE, Ralfine…

        • Ralfine

          Just read my other replies. The ones containing Saudi and CIA seem to disappear mysteriously.

          • Bradford

            …hey, nuttin’ personal, Ralfine, we gotta give the sheeple a good show here…
            …i got a target on my back, too…
            Think about it like this:
            If you WAS / WERE a REAL “terrorist”, would you be more, or less likely to try to strike the U.S., after seeing what went down in Boston?…
            Sure, we got some cowboy cops, but they’re damn GOOD cowboys…*grin*…lol…

          • Ralfine

            There is no need to strike the us. Just fill your household rubbish into a backpack and leave it somewhere.
            The state security will shut down the city and tell people to start the witch hunt.
            When they catch you you are shot during interrogation.

  • Jekyllac

    You tell the truth anywhere in America you get canned. Just ask Edward Snowden.

  • craynol

    Dear Sgt. Sean Murphy, I know your post was simply a reaction to the Rolling Stone cover and is used as an attempt to make yourself and others feel better. I argue though posting your own set of photos actually brings more attention to Rolling Stone and their cover. If supporters of boycotting RS had ignored the issue probably would have been a tree falling in the woods. What it has become is great unpaid press for Rolling Stone. The magazine makes very little money from sales at CVS or Walgreens. Moreover, I wonder how many of the boycott supporters ever purchased the magazine anyway? What you may not understand is this is what publishers do. They are very keen on how to push your buttons to have you unknowingly advertise for them. Maybe democracy is simply about ignoring things you don’t like?

  • Myles

    would they have put Osam Bin Crazy on the front cover? Seemingly this is a shamful ploy to increase publicity for a magazine that is cealry in the dying stages iof ist shel life. At least go out with some style!

    • Fred

      “seemingly.” i think you need to read the story and think deeply about how the cover relates to it. i won’t tell you what I think, but if you do that, i think you might come to a different conclusion.

    • Dov_Forest_Hills

      They did put Charles Manson on the cover decades ago.

  • SicSemperTinitus

    I know this photographer’s intentions were honorable because I wouldn’t even wipe my narrow butt with the pages of Rolling Stone. The inherent problem is that he only makes this evil monster look more like a typical Thirteenth Century Renaissance “Martyr” painting. Does anybody else see my angle on this? Rolling Stone would have loved to have been able to publish these photos. Irony will get you every time.
    TinintheDarkroom

    • Fred

      the photographer? Jahar Tsarnaev.

      SELFIE!

  • RANDY_PRINCE

    I WANT TO SEE THE PICTURE OF HIS BROTHER “SPEED BUMP” WITH TIRED TREAD PRINTS ON HIS DEAD HEAD
    BOTTOM LINE TERRORISTS— DONT F*KC WITH US IN BOSTON AGAIN

    • DrColostomy

      I heard his guts squirted out his a$$?

    • gr8hannan

      Stop f*cking them in their countries also.

      • Its_Not_A_Tax_LOL

        They came here, if you don’t like it, don’t come and jump on welfare.

        • Fred

          aaaaaaand, we went there. what’s the difference?

        • LuJohnson

          Awesome! So true!

      • LuJohnson

        Shut up about things you are wrong about, idiot. We didn’t wage war on them, they, and terror, has waged war on innocent people for a long time. We, and our allies will continue efforts to CRUSH that, and make the world a safer place, and to save kid’s lives. So go away, strange, unwashed dog-person.

    • LuJohnson

      Now that is a great idea! THAT’S a cover that would make me buy one!

  • wowgivemeabreak

    Hmm, ok so any cover that shows any alleged killer in a normal portrait way is glamorizing the killer and is an insult to the victim. Gotcha.

    This just once again proves how dumb police offers generally are.

    And he says he wants people to see the “real face” of terrorism…so an unarmed guy being shot up by about 5000000 cops? Yep, that sure shows how awesome law enforcement is. Nothing says handling the “bad guys” like having an entire city locked down and needing 4 trillion donut eaters to deal with ONE guy…who again was unarmed which of course this moron and the media and the cops don’t want to mention. They say he was in a gunfight. Apparently you can be in a gunfight when you have no gun. That’s good to know.

    The country has zero hope at all yet sadly all the moronic brainwashed people there are clueless to this and actually think stuff like this shows how great the country is. To go with this manhunt drama over one guy after 3 people who killed, the country went into massive debt in response to the false flag 9/11 so imagine if a real massive terrorist attack or massive catastrophe ever happens there. The country will probably collapse over it.

    USA!!!!

    • Its_Not_A_Tax_LOL

      Wanna see a moron? Look in the mirror. You are a lunatic.

      • Dave

        Cause you do not want to see the truth in his logic…. BTW any time anything major happens in this country it was funded by guess what THE DRUG TRADE!!!!!!!!

    • Guest

      OMG – you’re making me sick to my stomach! What an idiot!

    • Dov_Forest_Hills

      Ironic how you can call him unarmed, after he blew the legs off of unarmed people watching a marathon.

      • LuJohnson

        Sadly, Dov_, he doesn’t care. He’s detached and protected in his little room, in front of his little computer.

        Your exactly spot-on, accurate statements do nothing to alter his self-inflicted ‘superiority’ over us ‘morons out here’, and to those dealing with blown off leg stumps and loved ones obliterated by terror.

    • LuJohnson

      Oh boy, another conspiracy “believist”

      Apparently you know things that the rest of us “moronic brainwashed people” out here can never understand, regardless of our actual real-world experiences, training, or first-hand knowledge. You instead, choose to believe un-truth conspiracies, and wallow in them. Good luck with that.

      I’m sure I’ll soon be enjoying your next call in to the “Coast to Coast AM” show with George Noory!

      …. NEXT!…

  • Sean Duffy

    Great. Now this state cop gave the bomber more attention. Good one. We’ve already seen these photos when every news channel and newspaper covered the story to death for months. It’s not going to change anything. Rolling Stone is still running the issue with the cover. You’ve just made this scum the top news story even longer.

  • RPA

    Isto obriga-me a pensar sobre o Jornalismo, os critérios de notoriedade para publicação de notícias ou de imagens, a Ética, a Liberdade de Imprensa, o Direito a estar informado, a Liberdade de Expressão…

    This makes me think about Journalism, Ethics, the Right to be informed, Freedom of Speech, Freedom of information, and so on…

  • Steve

    Rolling stone is dying along with all magazines, this was just to get people to read their outdated, lold school magazine. Its sensationalism. They knew it would cause an issue, they could of done it sooner, this was calculated.

  • Susan

    The pictures seem to accurately show the manpower and caution the Boston police needed to ensure the safety of each officer facing the unknown. They have him alive for questioning and the image of a vulnerable, injured person who committed terrorist acts is what I prefer to show the public and any “terrorist wannabes” out there.

    This is America and I don’t see Rolling Stone as having done anything “wrong.” I do however prefer young vulnerable minds to see Murphy’s images.

    • Dave

      Now that is statement I can finally agree with hole heartly :)

    • Guest

      Exactly.

    • LuJohnson

      I agree with your last sentence. THAT should be shown to teens in all schools discussions of terror and current events.

  • Willy Scanlon

    They put Obama’s picture on Rolling Stone. To us Muslims he is a terrorist that through the use of Drones has murdered more than 1,000 innocent people(women, children, non-combatants) in Pakistan and Afghanistan. Trooper Sean Murphy is so wrong. The picture depicts that a terrorist could be anyone. But that’s not the spin that Murphy or the State Police want. They want to portray all Muslims as evil no matter what country they are from. There are 12 million Muslims in America. I am one of them. But being a vocal one got me interrogated last year by the Massachusetts State Police because I write to Muslims in Pakistan, Saudi Arabia where I worked for many years and Yemen, so that makes me an enemy of the state in their view. But as I told them which infuriated them at the time, Muslims will never be defeated or beaten down, even by them. But I would like to see the State Police explain why they fired 100 bullets at a boat with an unarmed suspect? He didn’t have a gun? And no gun was recovered when he was arrested. That’s what called Police abuse of power.

    • Dave

      You my friend are the reason we have free speech… I have friends that a Muslim and I am proud to know them. The ones that do terroristic things should be punished…

    • sandlapper

      How did they know he didn’t have a gun, bomb or whatever? He’d already murdered people, you idiot!

      • Fred

        coulda said the same thing with a better message if you left off “you idiot.”

        • LuJohnson

          ..sez the passive-agressive self imposed etiquette policeman. lol.

      • Willy Scanlon

        Because stupid what the police yelled out before firing that the news broadcasted was “He’s firing on us””. He was unarmed in the boat. They recovered one gun from his dead brother. Johar didn’t have one, nor did he have a bomb. And they could see with infra-red into the boat, so they knew there was no gun. That is going to be a bone of contention at his trial.

        • Guest

          OMG – words cannot describe you. I just hope one day you don’t need those stupid idiot policemen – OMG – you make me sick!

          • Willy Scanlon

            Well as the saying goes its better to be pissed off then pissed on. barf,barf.LOL

        • CDODGE2

          Lot of name calling from you… Muslim…

          • Willy Scanlon

            I have only 2 words for you infidel and they are not Bless You!

          • CDODGE2

            Your entire message was well thought out until you began responding by calling others names. Are you the type that can dish it out but not take it?

          • Willy Scanlon

            Americans like to demonize Muslims and praise themselves as then world’s superhero, which they are not. Often times I think America got just what it deserved on both 9/11 and the Boston Bombings so it knows that its not untouchable. That you too can feel the same sort of pain and loss that you have caused so many other people in other countries

          • CDODGE2

            Lovely… Terrorist just like your boyfriend Tsarnaev

          • Willy Scanlon

            see there you go with the name calling again. You think Muslims are gay? Or maybe you like little boys?

          • Willy Scanlon

            why does voicing my opinion make me a terrorist. CDODGE2 you really are a moron aren’t you?

        • TrueBlue73

          It wouldn’t necessarily have shown no weapon esp. if it were on/under his body.

          • Willy Scanlon

            its apparent you have never looked through an infra-red scope. its what they use on airport scanners that show up all metal objects. maybe you have never gone through a TSA checkpoint either? People show up as white objects and metal as dark objects in the white area.

          • sandlapper

            Oh – I guess now you’re an expert.

          • Willy Scanlon

            yes. I have looked through one as I targeted your troops in Iraq.

          • sandlapper

            ooohhh – I’m shakin’ !!

        • DrColostomy

          They really should have set the boat on fire with the little qu33r in it!

          • Willy Scanlon

            Fiberglass is tough to set on fire stupid. You called himn a name? you must be trolling for little boys on the net. Maybe the FBI should have a chat with you

      • CDODGE2

        Sandlapper, please see my snapshot of Willy’s discussion last week :)

    • CDODGE2

      If I was an officer of any kind in Massachusetts that day, I would have done the same thing to the person suspected of blowing up innocent people at a marathon in my city or state. It was a blatant terrorist attack and he needed to be captured.

      • sandlapper

        Thank you!

      • Dave

        CAPTURED WITHOUT ANY INJURIES you dummy… By him having injuries now more Terrorists think that they have more reasons to attack us….

        • CDODGE2

          He was in a shootout with police… of course he was going to have injuries. And they could have killed him on the spot if they wanted to. Did my comment make you that upset to call me a dummy? wow

          • LuJohnson

            Very well said!

        • DrColostomy

          OH NO! They “injured ” him! F U C K the little fairy, they should have put a bullet through his simian brain!

      • Ronald Farber

        Watch fewer action movies.

        • CDODGE2

          Good one….

    • Ronald Farber

      People would prefer to see no link between the 1,000’s of innocent people overseas and terror attacks at home. It would force them to think about what is done in their name. No: better to hunker down into a ‘them and us’ mentality. The implicit racism is so thick you could cut it with a knife.

      • Isabella Adamowicz

        You shouldn’t give refuge to those that hate you. It is in their countries that Christians are murdered, and priests heads are cut of, so yes, it is them and us all right .You want to put your head in a sand? It’s been tried before, doesn’t work.

        • Ronald Farber

          You’re turning into a bit of a creepy stalker.

    • LuJohnson

      The problem is, for example, we don’t know you.

      You, by your own admission, communicate with a part of the world that has caused death and destruction to innocent people all over the planet. They DO INDEED need to check you out!

      Come on, you feel insulted by people doing their job? I APPLAUD them doing that. I don’t know your motives, and neither do they. But I’m glad someone is checking you out. If that saves one child of any ethnicity or background (it’s terrible that I live at a time in history when I actually need to type that to be clear, as if it makes any difference.) from injury or death then it’s worth it.

      That bears stating again: One child saved from a possible, or eventual act of terror by making a few phone calls to you, or inviting you in for an interview so they can know, and understand your activities are above board, is worth it.

      Your rights have not been violated. CALM DOWN, MUSLIM.

      If you would adopt a more understanding attitude toward the enormity of the task of keeping Americans safe, then you’d be better off, and come off as a more caring person to the rest of us.

      Instead, you make a rebellious statement, “Muslims will never be defeated or beaten down, even by them!” and go into a pro-Muslim, Anti-Everything-Else psycho-rant, and you wonder why you were not welcomed with Warm Fuzzies? Seriously?

      Maybe if you could see yourself right now, and see yourself in the video as you were being interviewed, you would realize how HATEFUL and unstable you come across.

      If I were to see this behavior first hand, why in hell would I want you near me, in my neighborhood, near my loved ones and kids? I would certainly not want you anywhere near me or my community.

      Nope. I’d want you out. Any civilized peace-embracing, freedom loving human being would, here, or in any decent country.

      Your problem is, you feel you can FORCE your beliefs and ANGST on me and others. If we don’t comply, you get angry.

      Try being nice first, to garner respect. The way you are doing it now certainly isn’t winning you any kindness or rationality awards.

      • Willy Scanlon

        Here is the problem. Jerks like you assume that Muslims are up to no good, so we should be checked out because we may be planning an attack, because your thinking is that is what we are all about. Your that same jerk that would have interred the Japanese during WWII for being Japanese. America and people like you has caused death and destruction more than Muslims have to countries all over the planet since the 18th century. How many countries has America invaded? Some invaded built on lies like Iraq. Others invaded like Vietnam where Americans murdered ,tortured or raped hundred of innocent civilians including children. That the view of hypocrites like you. The reasons why 9/11 happened is because of attitudes like yours. We Muslims believe in giving you a punishment of equal measure that you have done to Muslims. Americans like you are bigots. America has caused more death and destruction in other parts of the world than anyone else on the planet.. That’s a fact. You are the ones that are the real terrorists in the world today. You don’t see Muslims droning entire towns. You don’t see Muslims murdering children and mothers as they sleep in their beds as American soldiers have done. Your just too smug to acknowledge it. Its the events like the Boston Marathon Bombings that will let you know that you are not untouchable. Think on that. That we can be right next door to you.

        • LuJohnson

          Your rant was tedious, more yadda yadda yadda hate. It’s easier than so many words. Behave like you should, be nice, don’t hurt people, don’t affiliate with people who do terror, and you are golden! It’s not hard!

          Ever heard of the Golden Rule?

          But, take up an attitude, call me names, call me and others on here, and the police brainwashed (for doing their job) and you lose credibility.

          Furthermore, we have never INVADED. We’ve had wars that we had to get involved in to save people’s lives, and to put down evil leaders. Then, we left.

          In WW2, we could have easily taken over countries, and built an empire. We didn’t. Hitler wanted to, and many others through history took a shot at that.

          So you are so wrong on so many levels, Willy.

          You’re not convincing anyone here. Your tactics are all wrong and you don’t know history, except the history YOU want to believe in your head.

          Try researching for yourself, instead of adopting things from conspiracy groups you’ve found on the internet. It’s not that hard, really.

          • Willy Scanlon

            In Islam here is our Golden rule: Don’t argue with fools or the ignorant. That takes care of 80% of Americans. You want us to kiss the hand that slaps us and lick the boot that kicks us. No that’s not going to happen. I do hate many fellow Americans. That also is a fact. Because you are complicit in murder and put yourself on a pedestal . I am the guy that will come along and knock you off it.

          • Willy Scanlon

            Your history is a bit flawed. America went to Vietnam and stayed for 13 years, lost but managed to murder, rape and torture anything with 2 legs. In Iraq there are 122 cases of rape against Iraqi women by American troops and 210 cases of murder of women and children by American troops. In Afghanistan we are the only country that used locals for target practice or laid an ambush because they were bored. Go check Utube. And I don’t need to do the research I worked in Afghanistan for a humanitarian organization for 3 years documenting war crimes including drone strikes by American forces. America had the same behavior when it was part of NATO in the Balkans in the late 1970’s. Since 9/11 America has become a fascist state. I’m not the only American that sees this.Stanford University issued a report about Obama’s drone strikes.Maybe you should go read it sometime. They take a look in the mirror at the real evil in the world today.

    • CDODGE2

      Willy, my email just blew up from you and others saying that I am a Muslim hater etc and the threats that were deleted because they were inappropriate… All I did was call you a muslim because you said above that you are NUMEROUS times… Let me ask you this…

      Why in the below discussion did you say “THAT GUY IS MUSLIM-SHOOT HIM”? And the statement above that says in the 3rd sentence “I WAS A POLICE OFFICER IN MAINE AT ONE TIME?”… I guess I am a little confused… Are actually a Muslim standing for what you believe in or are you just a whack job that goes from story to story trying to get people to say they hate “your people” simply because you are crazy? Perhaps you sir, should be interrogated by the proper authorities…

      • Willy Scanlon

        Nice to see you put so much effort into stalking people. Maybe you should have a chat with the authorities. Some things take priority over others. For Muslims our faith means more than yours does. That is why we can never be defeated by people like you.

        • CDODGE2

          I didn’t stalk you, your profile is public. And you said because a man was Muslim he should be shot. You are a fraud and a liar and obviously a psycho

          • Willy Scanlon

            Your a guy who trolls the net for little boys since your making homo comments, means you may be one yourself.

          • CDODGE2

            I’m a female. And you are just mad I called you out on your bullshit. I’m do e with you 😉

          • Willy Scanlon

            This comment has been removed for violating our commenting policy.

          • CDODGE2

            I guess so 😉 and you are just another terrorist… To each his own

      • Willy Scanlon

        If that floats your boat to report me to your proper authorities , ooooh you make me soooo afraid. LMAO at you.

        • CDODGE2

          I have no need to report you. You just openly admitted that the us deserved 9/11 and the Boston Bombings.

  • Its_Not_A_Tax_LOL

    I thought they said it was too influential to have Joe Cool on the front of a pack of Camel cigarettes, even if the warning of cancer is underneath? By that logic it would seem that having this scumbag on the cover of RS would be too influential to young people, even if the story of his cancerous actions is found hidden on the inside of the mag.

  • trashman777

    Rolling stone ragazine made a lame attempt to get back into the main stream and failed… Lame being the key word.

  • Ed_Kel

    I’m torn on this. On one hand, Rolling Stone magazine does put stars and celebrities on their covers and I get why that would upset people. On the other hand, I think what the magazine is trying to do is shed light on the individual in an effort to help us understand why he did what he did. In other words, this may be blown out of context. Though in a society as ignorant as America has become, perhaps it wasn’t the best idea to put him on the cover.

    • Its_Not_A_Tax_LOL

      Why not make a statue of him also? Then you can have a plaque underneath telling how bad he is.

      • Fred

        America, where a statue is the same as a Rolling Stone cover

      • Ed_Kel

        Have you read the article? Would you be this upset if he were on the cover of Time magazine? You’re answers will more than likely be no for both which is, ironically, my case and point.

    • LuJohnson

      Or maybe they could have used a small corner sized picture of the perp, with a well written article inside instead. But they chose to plaster his face as large as possible. At least they should be honest and admit that they were hoping to sell more magazines this way. Whatever their true motives, a full cover picture was a baaaaad idea in most folk’s minds.

      Sure, we’ve seen other notorious images on the cover before this, but they, and others, should draw the line on terrorists. Terror is different: the nature of the “hate infection” that begets terror is such that this sort of attention makes it worse. Terror crimes need to be handled differently, or their seed, in certain individuals, only spreads and germinates in more usually young, fertile minds. Hate works opposite to the way most negative human behavior functions.

      For instance, thievery, or any similar crime, often can be shamed by public display of the perpetrator’s crime and behavior. This works. Public shame brings light to the perp’s secret. The perp is known and rejected. Sent outside of the camp into the wilderness for awhile, so to speak. Perp comes back, and chooses not to do the crime again. This is our basic approach even today, with incarceration substituting for sending the individual out into the wilderness, away from camp, and all he knows.

      Hate-Terror is not affected at all by this universal deterrent. Unfortunately it’s an inverse anomaly. Makes it harder to quell. We need to think more about the psychology, and respond more intelligently.

      I think this is why the concept of Guantanamo incarceration/punishment works. Just isolate them. No media, no pictures, etc. They can’t engage outside supporters. This works now, and in many cases has throughout history.

      Getting a grip on controlling the mechanism and psychology of terror and it’s societal behavior is essential to stopping it’s horrible motives.

      • Ed_Kel

        I agree wholeheartedly. I just think that this is getting blown way out of proportion. I doubt Rolling Stone meant any harm. Like I told the gentleman that replied to me earlier, if it were Time magazine, they would probably be praised for the cover/article.

        I can see both sides here.

    • Lilee

      Rolling Stone was looking to have people pick up the magazine and say, oh who is this great looking new rockstar. And then say OMG it’s the Boston Bomber. The magazine article is about how such a ”normal” student could get radicalized and the cover was to emphasize that. What they didn’t anticipate is that people would say, OMG they’ve turned the Boston Bomber into a rock star. It was an editorial misinterpretation of how people would see the cover. The photos released to Boston Magazine are designed to have people see how necessary it was to have a military takeover of the city. (The Rolling Stone cover made him look like a 19-year-old rather the militant insurgent backed by some Muslim nation that they need him to be.) But for me these Boston Mag pictures also have a backfire affect. Patriots Day. Boston Strong. All the slogans. But we lost the city that day to the military who pulled citizens, hands in the air, out of their homes while pointing automatics at them. Very scary. For a thrill killer that they have to make bigger than life to justify our new militarized nation–which is, in Dick Cheney’s words, where congress has given our government the right to fight terrorism, not as a police action where you have constitutional protections, but as a military one where you don’t. We are at war, now domestically, and in our governments eyes, our constitution is suspended.

      • Ed_Kel

        That’s all complete speculation and I won’t entertain it. I’m a man that takes people by their word, not a conspiracy theorist. Thinking that RS did this on purpose in an effort to make him look “cool” is completely bogus in my book. The rest of your comment, I agree with but it has nothing to do with my original comment.

  • Alon

    The rage over this article is just silly. We should all want to know more about how this kid was dragged into such a terrible crime. And hiding our head in the sand makes no sense. This is a tragedy ,make no mistake, on many levels and not just the obvious ones. He is just a kid who was horribly misguided .

    • Shears_of_Atropos

      What’s the Chechen word for “Trayvon”?

      • Fred

        that’s amazingly out of touch.

    • sandlapper

      WHAT? I think we know all that! Geez, do you not care one iota about the families of the victims? I’m totally shocked!

    • DrColostomy

      He’s a maggot! He should be hung, disemboweled, and fed to pigs!

  • hairyapple

    A opportunity to land on the cover of RS is just the incentive a potential terrorist/glory hound needs to put a plan into action. These people, like Adam Lanza, instead of having their name echoed on the covers of magazines and on TV news should be rendered anonymous. Do not reveal their names or look for their aquaintences to fill in the details of their lives. Put them out for collection with the same fanfare as yesterday’s garbage. Personally if I were never to hear about these sociopaths again it would be too soon.

    • sandlapper

      Amen!

    • Fred

      i find it hard to believe that angst-filled muslims are blowing things up to get on the cover. they’re blowing things up to get justice (not that i agree with their methods)

      • sandlapper

        Justice for what? Is that okay with you?

        • Fred

          i should have made it clearer:
          (not that i agree with their methods or their reasons)

          i don’t live eye for an eye. it’s not ok with me, no. i just don’t think they’re shooting to get on magazine covers. Inspire, maybe. not RS. they have other causes.

        • James

          he’s a niqqer. what more can you say?

          • sandlapper

            You are making me sick. Please go somewhere else where comments like this would be welcome.

      • hairyapple

        Yeah there’s nothing like blowing up a few innocent bystanders to get your message across. Just like Adam Lanza, his message was “I’m an asshole”

  • Vinny Papagiorgio

    Images of the police state.

  • The_Alarm_Clock

    NO THROAT WOUNDS PEOPLE!!!!! TIME TO WAKE UP NOW!!!!

    WAKE UP WAKE UP WAKE UP!!!!!!!

    • Fred

      how can you tell?

      • The_Alarm_Clock

        1st picture! Where is the wound that required an immediate tracheotomy?

        It’s not there. It just isn’t. It was a lie.

        • Fred

          you can’t even see the left side of his neck. you know, where all the blood is dripping from

          • The_Alarm_Clock
          • Fred

            idk why you’d link me to the photos that i could scroll up to see…. but ok.

            where are you seeing the left side of his neck? it’s in a shadow in every one of those.

          • The_Alarm_Clock

            Oh look! Here’s the brother that was shot and run over…being led naked to a poice car. He must be a zombie.

          • Fred

            i’ll never understand why these theorists have such strong disbelief for ANYTHING the news stations say, but instantly believe an unverified, unconvincing youtube video.

            that’s not even him.

          • Fred

            i take that back, i do know why. it’s because it’s interesting to think those things. to think there’s some living illuminati making everything happen is interesting, i’ll give you that. but you take it to a whole new and dangerous level. guess who was a conspiracy theorist….. Tamerlan and Dzhokar Tsarnaev.

          • The_Alarm_Clock

            And I’ll always wonder why you would believe ANYTHING the stations tell you or ANYTHING the govt tells you when they’ve been caught and admitted to lying over and over and over and over again.

          • Fred

            it’s not what the gov’t tells me, it’s what there’s evidence to prove. you’re acting like you can see his whole neck to know that there’s no wounds. you can’t. you just really really want to believe he wasn’t wounded and his brother is alive.

          • The_Alarm_Clock

            Right…and there were WMDs all over Iraq.

          • TrueBlue73

            I watched the brother being loaded into the ambulance. This is NOT him. Not even Laurel Street!

          • TrueBlue73

            Please! The guy in this pic (naked guy) was blocks away from the shootout and was taken in for questioning while Tamerlan was already at the hospital.

          • gkr44

            goodness, Fred, we mustn’t let a simple thing like facts get in the way of a good conspiracy theory, must we? :-)

    • gkr44

      I did, but I kept hearing this annoying tinnitus-like ringing in my head a.k.a the whining of another conspiracy theorist

      • The_Alarm_Clock

        Whining? Right, that’s what I’m doing…

        • gkr44

          no need to get wound up about it, I’m just sayin :-)

    • DrColostomy

      nutcake.

  • toastypostingpuppet

    Man, think about all the damage to that poor guy’s boat!!!

    • Fred

      i think it was replaced. i forget who replaced it, but some awesome company donated either a boat or money for a new boat. was a looked-over feel-good story in all this. hell, i even forgot the details already.

      • Fred

        lol how do you thumbs down that?

      • James

        Because you’re a niqqer.

        • sandlapper

          Why do you keep doing this? You’re really showing what a despicable human being you are!

        • Fred

          lol no i’m not. that’s Dave Chappelle…. aaaaaaand, i’m white.

        • big banana

          troll

      • gkr44

        FYI:
        “Boat owner David Henneberry told WCBV TV, “It makes me feel wonderful that people are thinking like that, but it is my boat. People lost lives and lost limbs. I’d rather that [the money] go to the One Fund Boston. To buy me a new boat is a wonderful thing. I don’t want that, really. They lost limbs. I lost a boat.”

        The ‘feel good’ story of replacing his boat got even better when this man preferred that they donate to the victims of the bomber.

        • Fred

          yeah that’s f’ing excellent. i never followed up on that. what a guy.

  • NadePaulKuciGravMcKi

    the royal scam of Boston has now been fully exposed

    • Fred

      it only looks that way to somebody who’s looking for it to look that way.

      • sandlapper

        Please stop. This is ridiculous.

        • Fred

          don’t worry, he’ll die early and alone.

  • Guest

    Its a ‘selfie’ shot of him being faintly- yet perceptibly- coy. His hair is just right and he’s looking at the camera just so, like most young people have for their profile pictures on facebook. It romanticizes him because, well, who wouldn’t want a nice photo of themselves to be on the cover of rolling stones? I could understand how the public, especially from Boston, would be frustrated and angry.

    But releasing unauthorized photos from the police department’s file is unethical and illegal. The photographer should be fired and charged with slander, or whatever they charge people with for doing that.

    • Its_Not_A_Tax_LOL

      Unethical? How?

      • Fred

        i’m sorry, but if you don’t see how it’s, at the very least, unethical… you shouldn’t be on this thread

        • big banana

          Ethics and our government have long since parted ways. If you want to look at unethical look at the prosecutor’s behavior in the Zimmerman trial. Or the prosecutor’s behaviour in the Roderick Scott case. (Black man justifiably shoots unarmed white teen).

          The police photographers transgressions are minor.

          • Fred

            IM NOT F***ING TALKING ABOUT TRAYVON! OR DRONES! I’M TALKING ABOUT THE STORY WE’RE COMMENTING ON. how did this turn into a blanket controversy about every other thing wrong in the world right now?

          • James

            Now you’re even more of a niqqer.

          • Fred

            lol i can’t believe you even still exist to be honest. i thought your kind died off back in the 20s

          • sandlapper

            He’s just showing what a little redneck idiot he is. He’s just insecure about himself so he has to act like this.

          • big banana

            Just need to put things in perspective. When the government commits horrible acts and an honorable man commits an honorable act that may be against his government bosses wishes we need to look at the whole picture before we call for him to be punished.

        • James

          You’re still a niqqer.

          • sandlapper

            James, we don’t need this on here.

          • big banana

            Seriously? Stop the bullshit.

      • Guest

        because imagine you did something wrong, and the police hired a photographer just to take pictures of you getting arrested/ feeling humiliated, and then that photographer put them all on the internet for everyone to see for the rest of your life.

        • DrColostomy

          Hey dipshit, ever heard of a “perp walk”?
          Don’t do the crime if you don’t want a picture taken, jerkoff. I wish it were a live shot of the little fairy catching a load of 00 buckkshot in the face and his head splattering all over the boat!!

        • James

          That is what needs to happen.

    • James

      You’re an Idiot……………..Krap for brains.

  • disqus_4fYpwIITOy

    Now These pictures are more like it. Nice job, Mr. Murphy, nice job.

  • Misty

    This is repulsive!!! In my opinion every single one of these magazines that Rolling Stone has produced should be taken and shredded!!! And the fact that these were already on EBAY are you kidding me!!! Yes this is a part of history but to glorify this terrorist, Rolling Stone should be ashamed!!!
    ,

    • Fred

      BURN SOME BOOKS WHILE WE’RE AT IT!

      • James

        Yes, You are a niqqer.

        • sandlapper

          James – there is no need for that on here. Geez.

      • James

        @Fred, If it walks like a duck………………..

  • Hillary Klntohn

    He looks like a little f a got …just like holder …
    I’d commit a hate crime against the little f a g o t …

    Someone call holder….

    • Fred

      and you look like a bigot.

      • James

        And you look like a Niqqer. IDIOT.

        • Fred

          lol i’m not the moron that put my actual photo on the internet for all to see what a piece of racist sh** i am. i hope i run into you so i can punch your face off. btw, i’m white.

          • James

            Yes I am not ashamed of my looks like you. And yes, if it walks like a duck………………..You know whites can be called niqqers too and you act like one.

          • Fred

            lol i’m not ashamed of my looks. i’d just rather not have crazed lunatics much like yourself stalking me and shooting me with their freedom to bear arms.

  • irish7_1sg

    GOD BLESS SEAN MURPHY FOR HIS WONDERFUL WORK IN ASSISTING FAMILIES SCARRED BY THIS DISASTER! I disagree with those previous comments that stated Tsarnaev will glean more publicity from the release of these photos. Quite the contrary, these pictures show this punk, chump, HEATHEN MOSLEM as he truly is: A !@#$%^& COWARD!

  • Mo LaRouche-Yorgensen

    This is true photojournalism. The Sgt. was only doing his job, and he did it well. He captured the emotion of the day, and his pictures speak louder than any words a story could write. His photos will go down in history, he will be like many great war photographers and remembered. You only get that one chance to make history. This will be studied in ethic classes and other areas of academia. Whether he broke work policy for publishing these or not, is neither here nor there, simple work policy red tape BS. I believe Sgt. Murphy actions speaks honor and courage with a “counter-Rolling Stone” attitude. He did what he believed was best for the victims and their families. More people should stir the pot in this country and not take everything at face value. We have rights, let’s exercise them. Thank you Sgt. Murphy, you are a wonderful inspiration. What is next… take away our right to bear cameras?

  • Andrea

    By the way, before you start lobbing hate mail to me for my remarks which I have a right to say, try reading this if you can (read, that is):

    http://freedominourtime.blogspot.com/2013/07/im-going-to-take-him-out.html

  • Andrea

    Oh, interesting…they wouldn’t publish my comments…no matter…no one would have seen them anyway…the truth blinds most people in this country…

    • Fred

      maybe cut the cursing? maybe less links? maybe don’t blame the media for every wrongdoing you see in the world?

      • Andrea

        You prove my point….I don’t curse…I didn’t blame the media and in fact you have no idea what I said….
        And that is exactly how Americans call this man a “terrorist”.
        Based on indoctrination and lack of capacity.

        • Fred

          i said maybe. you’re making problems where there aren’t any. you can post whatever you want on here that fits within the guidelines and doesn’t contain what disqus considers to be a dangerous site. lol i like how you skipped saying “and i didn’t post too many links.” because you know you did.

  • concernedDad

    “Tactical” Photographer? How much does THAT cost taxpayers?

    • Fred

      kinda seems justified, dontcha think?

      if not just to shut some of these conspiracy theorists up sometimes.

      • Dean Jameson

        It pisses conspiracy theorist off, because having a video and/or photographic record of such things utterly debunks their nonsense, forcing them to come up with even more convoluted stories about how the photographs/videos are “doctored” or whatever.

  • Hillary Klntohn

    Put Zimmerman on the rolling stone cover and lets see what the black f a g ot of justice will do then

  • Debunker007

    This 19 year old is the lowest of the lowest.. The people at Rolling stones did a good job morphing a swine on their magazine cover. This low life deserve the death sentence. No pity must be shown to fanatic low lifes.

  • golfchick

    I’d like to know how many of the people who are rallying that Tsarnaev is innocent until proven guilty gave George Zimmerman the same credit and respecting the jury’s verdict?

    • JohnQAmerica

      The 2 are not even CLOSE in comparison. GZ was FORCED to do what he did in SELF DEFENSE. Lord were do these idiot liberals come from ?

      • Fred

        lol again. you can’t call somebody an idiot and misspell the word “where” in the same sentence.

        • JohnQAmerica

          h…there is that better ? I notice you can pick apart my missed key strokes. But you sure as hell can’t touch any of the facts about G. Zimmerman.

  • Robert Govan

    Sandy hook hoax drill, George Zimmerman hoax reality tv show, Boston Bomb drill hoax. Order out of chaos….Wellaware1.com

    • DrColostomy

      nutcake.

  • David

    I just find it pathetic the cops sent thousands of rounds though that neighborhood firing at the boat, the lefts newly anointed “anit-hero” hero was hiding in and they fricking missed him with every bullet. You want to talk gun control. How about teaching the PD to hit what it aims at. It would of saved us the dragged out torment of having a islamic terrorist morphed into a demi-god by the bill ayers types.

    For all the macho darth vader costumes, machines guns pointed at US Citizens being ordered to lay in the street or die. Police are still just civil service employees with a good union.

    • Hillary Klntohn

      Boston is proof ….Muslim queers do not fear the cracker queers .

    • sandlapper

      David – it is VERY evident you have no clue what it’s like to be a law enforcement officer. Please stick with what you know… whatever that is! AND, I hope you never need their help in the future.

      • David

        ok lapdog, you just curl into a fetal position and suck your thumb

    • John

      It’s known as “suppressing fire” they had no eyes on him and they didn’t want him to blow them up.

      • sandlapper

        John – people like David don’t get it anyway. There’s no use even trying to explain it.

      • David

        thats not “suppressing fire”, suppressing fire means pin the emeny down with a base fire, don’t let them maneuver, while the your team out flanks them for the kill. Has nothing to do with another pressure cooker. It was out of control blazing machine guns for the sake of
        blazing away and missing with every round. If you were there and fire just a single round to “stop him from blowing them up”, you’d still be in jail for risking public safty for firing a gun in city limits.
        No range office or drill sergeant will differ with my statement.

  • Andrea

    I have written numerous comments here, all of them without any profanity or racist comments. They have all been expunged but one comment below.
    And that, my dears, is exactly how information is delivered to you. Edited, steered away from any thought other than indoctrination.
    It is exactly how the Boston bombing information has been framed to propagandize you.

    • The_Alarm_Clock

      The majority will never believe the truth. The ability to think has been socially engineered out of them. They have to be told what to think otherwise they would have no opinion or wouldn’t know what to think.

      • Unknown1776

        says the person attempting to tell us how to think 😉

        • The_Alarm_Clock

          That’s a lie

    • zzk

      there are plenty of conspiracy comments on this thread. Do you really think your garbage ramblings on the internet are so important, controversial and far-reaching that they need to censored (but that other ones are let through… ?) or perhaps there’s a simpler, mundane and technical reason why your comments are being buried. I suppose the later explanation would take you out of the center of the universe though, so it can’t possibly be that.

      • Fred

        not to mention, the comments post instantly anytime somebody else posts one. nobody’s sitting here reading several thousand comments and picking out what they don’t like.

        i think Andrea would be well-off to read the Disqus terms of service instead of claiming she’s being oppressed.

  • Frank Ness

    This article is santicmonious horse manure

  • Rie

    Great job guys, for showing the real Boston bomber: defeated, bloody and in custody.

  • Newyorker

    These photos are phenomenal…the Boston PD should applaud Sean Murphy for having the fortitude they did not in distributing these photos…Rolling Stone cover is a disgrace. Much better to see e pic from the officers’ view approaching the tarp covered boat and the lasers trained on terrorist’s head…

  • Doug

    The Rolling Stone cover – Perfectly captures the true story behind this tragedy. An every day normal looking teenager on the surface/a monstrous killer inside.

  • Carol J. Saunders

    …and now we welcome Mr. Snowdon back home, to the Land of Free and the home of the “brave”..

  • Hillary Klntohn

    This comment has been removed for violating our commenting policy.

  • CharlotteGuy40

    You conspiracy theorists that actually have the stones to suggest that this guy is innocent, or that he has been framed crack me up. You are the same type of people that think the Moon Landing was a hoax and you believe in Bigfoot. I’m glad that 99% of you falling under tis category are employed at rudimentary jobs that often involve asking people if they would like fries with their order. I would hate to hear of any of you being able to infuence anyone outside of your local UFO clubs. Freaks

    • Andrea

      CharlotteGuy40,
      Please enlighten us with your evidence supporting the narrative that the government and media have handed down.
      Please illuminate this discussion with facts.
      Thanks for your sagacious remarks and I look forward to your factual presentation.

      • Joe S.

        Andrea, I understand that you do not have the patience for shrewd and short-sighted commentary. Since you keep asking folks for facts and to cite sources like it’s a term paper, I’m curious to see what facts you’ve gathered during your hard-hitting investigation and exactly what your views are. Please enlighten us all with your infinite wisdom so that we too, may see the light.

        • Andrea

          Thanks for your comment, Joe,

          I could be wrong but judging from the derisive tone that you bring up citing sources from a “term paper”, it appears that you don’t approve of citing facts that could contradict your biases or maybe you never wrote a term paper.

          No matter….I could keep you entertained all day with investigative facts but it might tax your world view.

          Oh, ok….you can start here but after this I’m done.

          Kind of starting to feel like I’m dumpster diving….

          http://whowhatwhy.com/2013/05/14/who-in-boston-bombing-story-mysteries/

          • Joe S.

            Andrea, you are correct in that my tone was derisive. I am just a bit confused how an editorial, questioning the reporting of mainstream media by Russ Baker, qualifies as a valid source of factual information. I’m sure taking the time to direct me away from your opinion to another man’s opinion was painstaking.

            I think everyone knows there were inconsistencies involved with the reporting of facts. Personally, I have a lot of questions regarding certain items involved in the case and timeline of events. However, having lived through the events and having a deep personal connection to things that transpired over the days to come, I’m letting the process unfold with an eye towards how the prosecution presents its case.

            A person that posts an opinion on this, or any other site, does not need to back their editorial up with facts or cite references. For you to belittle one’s outlook and place in a public forum calling for factual documentation is elitist and quite frankly uncalled for. You may think you’re an intellectual bully as you pass out pamphlets at train stations with your “Rational Minds Question Authority” T-shirt on, but you’re just a mouthpiece for smarter and more qualified folks like Russ Baker. I mean let’s be honest here, just because I read “Secret Agenda” by Jim Hougan, it doesn’t qualify me to ridicule other’s opinions on Watergate.

            All in all, I’m sure you’re not ill-willed or a bad individual, but merely just condescending, arrogant and pompous.

            Also, I hardly believe this would be the first time you have been dumpster diving.

          • Andrea

            You contradict yourself but that’s ok….

            The “facts” given by the gov and mainstream media have an ax to grind and an agenda to maintain.

            The questions that Russ Baker among others presents are legitimate rebuttals to the bilge that was given to the public.

            The factual answers to these questions may paint a very different picture and then what will you all do with your pitchforks and your calls for blood….

            If you have been emotionally traumatized, then you of all people, should be demanding the truth.
            Are you demanding the truth, Joe?

            Or are you on your petty witch-hunt to pillory anyone who does question the event.

            Try this one on for size and for once in your life, have the guts to admit that you and many others are being treated like fools.

            http://rt.com/usa/fbi-blocks-release-todashev-autopsy-195/

          • Joe S.

            I’m not contradicting myself in the least. Your problem with this whole situation is you think I’m on the complete opposite side of you. In reality, I’m not. I just find it humorous that you can attack people that are emotionally charged about a topic and start playing the role of a literary professor by asking for references, and specific citations when you aren’t offering anything to the discussion. Also, I applaud you for not having the nerve to simply copy and paste a link to somebody else’s editorial that you so eloquently plagiarized.

            You sound like an older woman with an education so it’s shocking to me for you to say the mainstream media and government have an agenda. You act like this is something new when in reality, every entity and every person walking God’s Green Earth has their own agenda. People lie, cheat, steal, deceive and mask true emotions on a daily basis so that it best serves them. You writing on this blog site is serving an agenda.

            To clarify what I said and help undistort your representation of my thoughts, I am simply waiting to see how this plays out in a court of law. I don’t have a pitchfork. I am not calling for blood. I, however, do have an opinion that has been formed by a multitude of factors and influences so I do not need to memorize the thoughts of talking heads on either side and regurgitate them as my own.

            Just so I’m clear on things and understand what your mindset is, do you actually feel the right person is in custody at this point? Or, do you view this as a large-scale conspiracy that the government has orchestrated to set off a chain of events that suits their needs?

      • DrColostomy

        Time to invest in a tinfoil hat.

        • Andrea

          Dr. Colostomy,

          Please enlighten us with your evidence supporting the narrative that the government and media have handed down.
          Please illuminate this discussion with facts.
          Thanks for your concern regarding my need for an investment hat and for your charming and classy “handle” on this commentary. I look forward to your factual presentation.

      • CharlotteGuy40

        Seen any aliens lately Andrea? I bet you spend hours glancing out the curtains to see if there is a suspicious vehicle parked outside. He ran over his own brother while trying to flee. Fact. He was found with incriminating evidence near and on him. Fact. There are photos proving both of these btw. Oh wait, you probably assume that anyone in law enforcement is probably in on the whole conspiracy right??? Every officer that was there. Every one that was witness to his processing. How about the doctors? Nurses? Get a grip and stop smoking weed. You are old enough. It’s time to grow up.

    • roosterCrow4

      I kept up with this event from the time that it happened and even if this guy is guilty, there are so many oddities that just don’t make any sense. I can’t understand how people can accept the narrative by our media and Government when there are so many discrepancies. Too many contradictions to this appear as a cover up and a patsy. If these two brothers were operating to blow up us infidels without some form of CIA black ops support, I’d be surprised. They are the first Muslim terrorist to make an effort to survive and not become jihadist Martyrs? They were the first muslim terrorist to not claim responsibility? Tsarnaev is the first muslim terrorist to plead “Not Guilty”? I thought these personality types were all looking for 72 virgins. I’m not saying he is innocent, I’m just saying this attack was a convenient way to herd and condition people. Too many lies coming from the Feds now days and the media is not very investigative anymore. Mostly propaganda IMO.

      As far as your other assumptions, I work as a designer for a marketing firm, think people that believe the moon landing was faked are idi0ts, and don’t believe something just because the officials say so. Observation of facts in this event just leave too many unanswered questions.

      • zzk

        So two adults could not have possibly stuffed some explosives into a pot without the help of specially trained CIA operatives? You’re looney tunes.

        • roosterCrow4

          Sigh. I said this story has too many holes in it and would be surprised in this was not a CIA operation based on all the descrepencies.

          Have you ever been to a magic act? The magician can make it appear like he is sawing a woman in half in front of a live audience. Looney tunes is when you see smoke and mirrors and people like you say it’s my imagination. How do you explain two of the FBI agents dying in a training exercise days later? Could just be coincidence until you start noticing a pattern of coincidence. How to explain to changing facts the FBI agents presented when questioning his unarmed friend that was shot execution style?

          I bet you even believe Michael Hastings died in a car wreck and that Benghazi was caused by a you tube video. I’m not saying this guy is innocent. I’m just not blind or deaf to some problems with the official narrative.

      • Fred

        to be fair, they aren’t your typical terrorists either. they lived and grew up American. also, it’s been said that they had plans for more destruction in other cities.

        • roosterCrow4

          Maybe. Just seems like it plays into the trading of liberty for security to me. I guess I should accept that Benghazi really was caused by a youtube video too.

      • CharlotteGuy40

        Noone said all the crazies worked at McDonalds Rooster. Look at Howard Huges….smart guy that was bat shit crazy enough to collect bottles of his own piss at home. Now, I’m not saying you have a fascination with your urine. I am saying that you at least have the ability to recognize that this guy is not innocent. Am I saying that we are always getting 100% truth from each government agency? Not at all. However, to suggest that there is a sane reasoning behind what this scumbag did or to imply that he was simply a pawn in a grand American Government led conspiracy? One that involves a movement, by our own government, to mislead Americans by maiming it’s own children and women is retarded. No, that’s not politically correct but it’s accurate as hell. It is the type of banter usually vomited up by potheads that wanted to elect Ron Paul. (based on his politics of course. Nothing to do with his stance on weed.) So, no…you don’t fit the mold of who I described in my first comment. You may have played a bit too much Call of Duty though. I would suggest 1 less conspiracy laden novel a year and stop looking in the rear view mirror every 30 secs at the dark sedan that HAS to be following you. In fact, it’s probably as a result of this post.

        • roosterCrow4

          The NSA spying on us must be a right wing conspiracy. Benghazi was caused by youTube.

          Right?

          http://www.thecontroversialfiles.net/2013/02/33-conspiracy-theories-that-turned-out.html

          Or how about just link to 33 “conspiracy theories” that happened to be true. I know, I know. It’s a conspiracy site, but every one of these FACTS are public knowledge that can not be denied. FOIMA was good government.

          Now as far as our government not harming its own sons and daughters… I can’t believe someone is so ignorant of history. That is like saying we would never put anyone in camps to a Japanese or Native American descendant. Or tell a family member of the Tuskegee experiments they were not given syphilis.

          Governments are operated by men and women. Sometimes for the betterment of society and sometimes for the worse… because men are corruptible. You should read more history and philosophy to better understand human nature. There are predators and there are prey in nature. Don’t think because you have an opposable thumb and written language, that some how exempts you from the natural world.

          Just like your comment about me playing call of duty, you assume too much. I am 43 years old, a gulf war vet and aware that group think is a herd mentality. The lesson people miss in Chicken Little is the Fox was behind making him believe the sky was falling. Don’t mistake that for meaning there is not a fox.

  • Gracie

    I am just as amazed that a magazine would use this photo on their cover. Yes, they are glamorizing him. How many people just don’t care? I care, because he is a monster. I am tired of the ” bleeding hearts” I have heard, say his brother was to blame for getting him in this. Well, didn’t he run over his brother, and kill him because he is a ” homicide bomber?” ( as we use to call them , and to the very end kept on killing, and didn’t even have regard for his own brother. So, people who think he is just a poor misguided young man whose brother led him down the path he was on, wake up and start to call a murderer just that , a murderer. He and his brother must have made a pact that if one was going to be caught he would rather die than be apprehended. So, he did that to his brother to help him get to “paradise”. I read that terrorists believe if they kill Americans, they will please Allah and go to paradise. So, let this cover be off the shelves and you who sell them for profit, shame on you…

    • Andrea

      Gracie,
      Interesting that you read that if terrorists kill Americans they will please Allah.
      Please site your sources on that so that we may also have the knowledge and wisdom that you possess.
      Thanks so much

  • xofpi

    Shame on Boston Magazine for jumping on the nervous nellie bandwagon/attack on Rolling Stone’s First Amendment rights and responsibilities.

    I hate the smell of hypocrisy, faux outrage and self-righteousness from the media in the morhning. I miss a country that was able to take news straight. Or maybe it’s an illusion that such a place ever existed but in the imagination. In any case, I really hate what the country and its media have become, and you, Boston magazine, are part of that sickly,. schlocky mess. Congrats.

    • SahibandCrew

      Uhhhh, no. Please take a refresher course on the constitution. Individual and media outrage at the Rolling Stone cover is NOT an attack on their First Amendment rights. Only if a governmental entity tries to censor them is it an attack on their First Amendment rights.

      • xofpi

        Uhhh, yes, the Rolling Stone has the (first amendment) right to put on its cover who they want, and uhhh, when gangs of media attack that right (while conveniently doing their own form of exploitation of the subject, Boston Magazine, which is *their* First Amendment right), it can have the force of a govt attack. e.g., when it results in distribution companies sanctimoniously singling out the offending issue for censorship. What’s the effective difference between that and actual state censorship?

        What I object to most about the pseudo-sanctimony on the anti-RS side is that it excuses itself from having to think hard about what it’s doing, which is contributing to an atmosphere in the US that has been going on for far too long, in which there are “correct” messages and “incorrect” ones on certain subjects. We don’t realize the seriousness of what is going on because it feels too damn good to be self-righteously offended (by an image it makes very little sense to be offended about the way people are being offended). We are losing–no, actively throwing out–our multi-dimensional free press for the sake of an illusory grand scheme monolith of sanctioned thinking in opposition to “terror.”

  • desertcherokee

    The Rolling Stone cover simply depicts someone in normal circumstances of life. It helps remind us that pleasant-looking people can commit heinous crimes.

    One of the least admirable traits of our culture is that we are strongly inclined to see the world in simple contrasts, such as good and evil. But there are elements of each in all of us.

    Unless it has been doctored, there is nothing wrong with the Rolling Stone cover. The police photographer – and those who share his “sense of outrage” – are being sanctimonious and immature.

    Shouold newsmagazines never have published photos of Hitler, or Stalin, or…..”Whitey” Bulger?

  • BoruBrian

    Yes, yes, Rolling Stone, still remains relevant to about 4 people who still read it.

    I wonder if these same defenders, would take the same take, if Rolling Stone had presented a photo shopped flattering picture of Zimmerman their cover.

    I am curious if Adam and others would also see this as “…a narrow view of journalism and journalistic priorities that the end product would probably do little to educate, enlighten, and engage readers…”

    and then blame the readers for objecting (Martin supporters)

    That is the problem with these boring hippies, blaming society only works if it agrees with their narrow viewpoints.

    • sandlapper

      You are exactly right!

    • Richard Walker

      8 people now. The controversial cover has doubled their readership.

    • Isabella Adamowicz

      Hippies are losers, who can’t manage life, only capable of blaming society. Yawn.

  • Kevin B. Bantz

    So the Police were withholding these photos and now sold them? So when did the Police become a private business? What else are they hiding and selling on the side?

    • sandlapper

      They didn’t SELL them!

    • Maverick1327

      They were not sold, and the officer put his career on the line for them. Get your facts straight, your ignorance is whats wrong with this country, jumping to conclusions or just trying to be a smartass.

  • SomeGuyNamedMark

    Two wrongs don’t make a right. How does showing a kid covered in blood help anyone? This sgt needs to be disciplined.

    • sandlapper

      That wasn’t the point and you know it!

  • franklin st resident

    I think these photos make him look more sympathetic than the cover, which has a photo that has been seen so many times it’s not even really seen anymore.

  • Maverick1327

    I have seen the cover and read the article that this is in response too. I am also a Watertown resident, and consider myself a Bostonian at heart. I have a few thoughts.

    1. The cover image was poorly chosen. In my opinion it should have been two photos, one of him like they used and then one of him in custody. With a title for fitting Like ” Suspect #2: How a well young liked man lost his way and became a monster” something like that. The picture the chose and the main title “the Bomber” didn’t bother me, but i certainly understand how the victims and those involved were upset, it was clearly done to draw attention, because as they say in Hollywood, all press is good press. So that piece of it i certainly disagree with.

    2. The article wasn’t terrible, it was an interesting read, but i think it would have been nice to juxtapose the victims in the story somehow, it might have been a nice double issue.

    Like i said before, I live in Watertown. The shooting in Watertown happened half a mile from my home, I heard the pressure cooker bombs go off. I was locked in my house for two days and didn’t sleep for more than two or three hours. All you conspiracy theorist can take a hike, i saw the car speeding down the road, i saw first hand how the police handled the situation. This kid and his brother were dangerous killers, and after witnessing what i did that night, there is no doubt in my mind those two are guilty, plain and simple.

    Contrary to a lot of people’s lack of faith in on government, I have not lost all faith, especially in my home state and town.

    What the police did that day was courageous, and i hope Justice is served to the young man who was half responsible for a lot of pain and suffering.

    My heart goes out to all those directly effected by the bombs that fateful day. But it also goes out to the city I know and Love.

    • Unknown1776

      thank you. This is on a side note, but related to your praise of the police force’s actions, too many people are seeing the actions undertaken in your city as representative of a government gone bad, attempting to destroy the liberties of the people (which I find reprehensible given the situation. It’s deeply saddening and infuriating that such acts of public good are misrepresented and skewed as they have been). So, thank you for being proud at what the police did. They were heroes, and yet somehow they’re being portrayed as villains, actors in a great plan to takeover every single municipality in the country in its attempts to secure total control. So, once again, thank you.

    • Lars C.

      No, the cover is NOT badly chosen.

      On the contrary, it’s the only choice to reflect the fact people always quite naturally idolize beauty. So it’s as much ironic media (self) criticism as anything else. If only you want to see it.

      • Maverick1327

        We can agree to disagree on this, but the problem is we live in a very ignorant country at times where most people take things at face value. So not many people will get the irony and the self criticism. Which is why i think it’s a bad choice, although i am not offended by it. But i respect your view.

  • Guest

    I used to laugh at people when they said their comments were deleted… not any more. Don’t know why mine were. No mean, dirty words… just don’t get it!

  • tomncoffee

    “QUESTION AUTHORITY” IS BACK! Everyday we all see new posts on Facebook and Youtube of The Police behaving badly. So we have 2 distinct faces of law enforcement, good and evil. Time was when the public perception of law enforcement was generally good with a few bad apples once in a blue moon. Unfortunately, the Rise Of The Police State has reduced law enforcement’s credibility. We need law enforcement when bad things happen. We don’t need law enforcement making bad things happen. So you law enforcers out there who want to improve the situation need to check your attitude at the door and rebuild the public trust. Then maybe you’ll see more support. When the public no longer sees people being tased and shot and home invaded by cops with bad attitudes, destroying the people they are supposed to protect, then things will improve.

    • David

      I don’t think it’s an issue of public mistrust of police. With the PC agenda of “suspect everybody of being a possible domestic terrorist” I suspect the police are being trained to be “stand off” in interact with the public.
      I marched in a memorial day parade in a middle size city in Conn. All the parties partaking in the parade were intermingling and chatting at the parade kick off point before the parade. With the exclusion of the city police element. They stood close to the armored car they be riding in. Dressed in tactical ninja uniforms, weapons strapped their legs. They keep to themselves and expressed a body language of “don’t approach us”. These para-military police, who glared from behind their black wrap around sunglasses at the young boys who tired to peer into the APC, are far different from the men in dress blues who use to march with the rest of the bands, cub scouts and vets no too long ago.

      • tomncoffee

        I don’t know ANYONE who trusts the POLICE STATE.

        We no longer live in the innocent age of Andy Griffith.
        And even that wasn’t so innocent.

        We are witnessing the decline and fall of America.

  • http://www.facebook.com/bob.loblar Bob Loblar

    Some seriously sick puppies posting here.

  • Sharri Radtke

    Go Sgt. Sean Murphy Go! YOU DID THE CORRECT THING! I just wish you had said more for us to never forget those injured and the first responders from all walks of life. God Bless you!

  • @nickk330

    He supposedly had a throat wound that didn’t allow him to talk. But in the pictures, his throat looks fine. Or we can look at the fact the FBI is blocking the autopsy release of an acquaintance of the younger brother who lived in Florida who the FBI questioned and then shot twice in the head (all while he was unarmed). Or lets look at the fact the younger brother wasn’t armed but yet the police shot dozens of bullets into the boat. Or the fact that there is no evidence that the brothers ever had the bombs or placed the bombs at the event. Or the fact that this event only killed three people but yet the region of Boston was turned into a martial law zone. Or that there is no evidence that the brothers ever stole a car or killed the police officer. It’s all just stuff they have told us happened. The same people who cover up the NSA spying, PRISM, Benghazi, killing of innocents with drones… and we are just supposed to believe what they tell us?

    • Isabella Adamowicz

      Fantastic! Only 3 people.! What a perl of a wisdom and compassion!

      • @nickk330

        I’m not saying only 3 people as in it’s not a big deal. of course people dying is a big deal. but the deaths of only 3 people does not constitute a reason for putting the entire area of Boston into martial law. People die all the time in Chicago, but yet they don’t put the city under martial law. They also don’t bring in armored military vehicles or tanks like they did in Boston. There is much more to this than just some kids making some cooker bombs and then running.

  • NorthOfThe49th

    As a Canadian, I can’t help but laugh at all the ignorant comments on here by people somehow trying to defend a murderer and terrorist. They were lobbing homemade bombs at the police after car jacking a witnesses vehicle but surely it’s a conspiracy theory. So glad I’m Canadian. I feel sorry and ashamed for the victim’s families that they have to call many of you their fellow countrymen and women. So glad to be Canadian where we support justice against evil acts and people, and not look to find any excuse to rally against what is right and good.

    • sandlapper

      I’m an American – but… I REALLY DO AGREE WITH YOU! I promise.

      • Isabella Adamowicz

        Another sane person.

    • Part Cherokee

      I’m sure you realize many, and likely most, Americans are not so ignorant.

    • Joe S.

      Is Quebec still considering itself Canadian these days?

      • Man With No Name

        Yes, unfortunately…

    • Man With No Name

      As a Canadian, I don’t get what it is you’re so glad about…

    • Paul

      Whats sad is that Canada is somehow more of a free country than the US is now.

      We live in a police state. Its sad when almost every one of my co-workers from the former Soviet Bloc make the statement that America is a police state. I think they’d know.

    • Isabella Adamowicz

      Exellent post. At last some sanity.

    • StoutCortez

      You Canadians don’t even enjoy freedom of speech.

      • http://www.american-partisan.com/ Tim Rollins

        There is freedom of speech in Canada, you ass. Section 13 – the section of the law that LIBTARDS used years ago to criminalize speech was stricken from the books, thus making Canada MORE of a FREE SPEECH country than AMERICA under Ovomit.

        Game. Set. Match. Now stuff a cork in it, Stout!

  • Lars C.

    My dear. It’s simply hopeless to fight against the media. It’s a circus, we’re the audience.

    This is why some countries have no free press. Not so bad idea, after all, don’t you think 😉 ?

  • BoruBrian

    Hippie movement lasted about 18 months, but some folks just can not let go. They probably are still waiting for their VCR’s and Atari’s to make a comeback.

    Rolling Stone is irrelevant in today’s world.

    But I did find that story on McChrystal, one of the more interesting stories about the folks leading the armies in the Middle East. Fascinating study about a guy, whose history at West point, could have predicted the very self destructive actions that eventually happened.

    His staff probably thought, who cares what he says, no one reads that rag anymore.

    If Rolling Stone was serious magazine, then photo shopping a cover of Zimmerman has to be their next cover. After all, the same thought process has to hold true for this cover.

    • Vierotchka

      “Hippie movement lasted about 18 months” … you obviously were born decades after it and know nothing about it!

      • Part Cherokee

        I remember it well. I also remember its effects.

      • Isabella Adamowicz

        Hippies were losers then, but most recovered, those who didn’t… are laughing stock

  • CURTISPUDGETT

    Why is Massachusetts State Police Sgt. Sean Murphy being fired for telling the truth and letting the public veiw what Rolling Stone Magizine should have? I think Rolling Stone should fired and completely shut down for what they put on their cover.. Please please reinstate Sean Murphy He did nothing at all wrong!!!

    • Man With No Name

      for being an irresponsible idiot…

    • BigInMemphis

      He won’t be fired.

      • Maverick1327

        He’s already been relieved of duty, so wrong again BIG, batting 1000 today 😉

        • BigInMemphis

          Damn you Maverick!!!!

        • Maverick1327

          And while not being called being fired he is being fired, but he’ll get to keep his pension which makes sense, what he did was right, but he did violate major codes of conduct.

  • Vierotchka

    No sign on these photos of the shot to his throat which was claimed he did to himself. Perhaps it was made after these photos were taken.

    • tomncoffee

      Right, he had a gun in his hand and shot himself strategically with a gun, coincidentally so that he cannot speak. If he had a gun and raised it he would have been gunned down so fast he would have not even known he was dead.

  • Sharri Radtke

    As someone who has been involved in law enforcement for 30 some years I will highly agree with your reason and courage. I have seen first hand how influential that photo and others like work in the wrong direction. Too many times weak people have used the wrong photo to cause more crime. Many of the recent shootings come from copy cats. He is not a hero. He is the devil’s child. We all need to remember everyone who was involved and support the victims more. TV and magazines should be focusing on the recovering victims and how we can help. Please remember that law enforcement are also victims. They hurt and have nightmares just like others.

    • Man With No Name

      How many emulated Charlie Manson after their cover photo of him??

    • tomncoffee

      Law enforcement is not a “victim”. We now live in a POLICE STATE. Don’t try to get me to cry for law enforcement.

      • Isabella Adamowicz

        Ingrate

        • tomncoffee

          I will cry for law enforcement when law enforcement cries for me.

          • Isabella Adamowicz

            Be careful what you wish for.

          • tomncoffee

            I wish there was no terrorism, I wish there was no police state. I have rights under the Constitution, and one of them is free speech. If I have to worry about what I say in a public forum then this country is dead already.

    • Isabella Adamowicz

      Respect.

  • Part Cherokee

    I haven’t picked up a copy of Rolling Stone since 1982. The cover photo was of John Belushi The caption was, “not just another pretty face.”

    Belushi died the same week, as I recall.

    Perhaps this issue is a portent for its cover subject.

    • Man With No Name

      Charlie Manson is still alive…

      • Part Cherokee

        The word “still” in your comment is superfluous. Have a nice day.

  • Griffin

    Dzhokhar Tsarnaev is Hero. Look what the US did to the World and is still doing.

    • SoulSeekerUSA

      And you should be deported for stupidity.

      • Maverick1327

        No one else should dignify this guy a response…hell i shouldn’t!

      • Tommy

        Griffin = Troll.

    • UsGotRights

      He is a terrorist and deserves the death penalty with the rest of them. Then there will be no need for dumb discussions like this.

    • BigInMemphis

      America is terrible … wait, my latte is ready.

    • DrColostomy

      Let me guess…you have a crush on him? Want to “be one” with him?You muzies crack me up. Stick to humping your goat.

  • SoulSeekerUSA

    It is so amazing how some people just cannot see whats right in front of their faces. What is wrong with some of you? This man is a terrorist and should not even have a trail. He is a TERRORIST and should be held in a military prison.

  • BigInMemphis

    The Rolling Stone is a liberal rag so glamorizing terrorists is right in line with the narrative. Tough break for here for the low info voters.

    • Maverick1327

      What does any of this have to do with being Liberal? Way to get your shots in you “Conservative buffoon”!

      • BigInMemphis

        Ah come on, this is the liberal way. Wake up simpleton.

        • Maverick1327

          I am liberal you ignorant fool, and please read my post below and tell me I’m a simpleton! What a joke get your head out of your ass. I am from Boston and I live in Watertown, im not defending rolling stone, but it’s got nothing to do with being liberal, but what should i expect, leave it to a conservative simpleton to make a statement like that.

          • BigInMemphis

            Point taken. Folks from Boston should be furious over the the Rolling Stone cover. However, you will be the only liberals to be angry about this because the Rolling Stone is the quintessential liberal magazine and liberals in America are quite sympathetic to terrorism … until it’s in their backyard.

          • Maverick1327

            Sympathetic to terrorism? Are you serious?…yah im all for innocent people dieing! You pegged me dead on! Wow if you represent the views of conservatives these days no wonder why are country cant get anything done. Terrorism in any form is disgraceful and intolerable, there are way to protest without violence and killing innocent people, but then you say that we are sympathetic toward terrorism but your also okay with people owning machine guns…And then they go out and do something and you blame it on the liberal media and violence in video games and movies, when your the reason these people have guns in the first place, its an endless fucking cycle. Think before you speak! no one is sympathetic toward terrorism except the people doing the terrorism!

          • Isabella Adamowicz

            Read some comments here, for example that one:

            :Griffin • 26 minutes ago −

            Dzhokhar Tsarnaev is Hero. Look what the US did to the World and is still doing.

          • Maverick1327

            Posts to get a rise out of people or a radical islamist? I mean yah they use the internet too…just saying.

          • BigInMemphis

            OK, first calm down. Second, the liberal class (YOU) are being defined by your gods in DC and they are certainly sympathetic towards terrorism and radical islam. And since EVERY liberal I hear spews the same talking points as those from DC and the state-run-media it’s clear and quite appalling how liberals view this great country. You can thrash here all you want but magazines like the RS are all a part of the “new narrative” for America and the majority of Americans (conservatives, independents and libertarians) are sick of it. I am a libertarian which makes me a small government person which of course makes me the polar opposite of you… but not a conservative. Sorry little buddy.

          • Maverick1327

            No ones not calm there big Memphis, it’s funny how you think you can pick up my demeanor from reading these posts. And your so wrong, a majority of Americans aren’t sympathetic toward terrorism, but we respect other religious beliefs. I’m sorry but you in no way represent the majority of Americans. Just because I am okay with someone following the muslim faith and Islam doesn’tmake me sympathetic toward terrorism, it makes me tolerant. Too many people like yourself allow your religious beliefs to skew your own views. Not all muslims are terrorists, there is a small portion of radical ones that tend to follow that path. Seriously IGNORANT IGNORANT IGNORANT!

          • BigInMemphis

            You pegged me… Damn. But you would be totally wrong. How many Americas Muslims have been murdered by other Americans since 9/11? None! We are all tolerant asshole, it’s what makes us Americans. The sad thing is that while YOU are tolerant with Islam you liberals attack Christianity any time you can. Tolerant? Nope! You believe my religious views are the basis of my dislike of the liberal mindset? Wow, arrogant and stupid. Enjoy your pathetic liberal bubble tough guy!

          • Maverick1327

            Haha whose trying to be a tough guy? I have no problem with Christianity at all. But when people of that faith persecute others and try to take away there rights, that’s when i have an issue. Frankly i think all religion is the cause of many problems in this world. And you know what maybe your one of the few conservatives, libertarians, whatever you are, who can separate church from state, which i doubt based on our conversation. But most can’t. I have many people i love and respect dearly that are Christians that also share liberal points of view. So come at me with another one…I’m Waiting…

          • BigInMemphis

            You wore me out. We will battle another day.

          • Maverick1327

            I look forward to it…

  • astralweeks

    F#&k Rolling Stone. I’ll never waste another dollar on that rag again.

  • Yves

    this peace off scum had to be dead, but letting him rot in a state prison is maybe the best thing that could happen to him! Death sentence is more than apropriate for this fun loving and caring muslim neighboor; peace off shit!!!

    • Part Cherokee

      Life in prison is not a life. Death would be easier.

      • DrColostomy

        His butt will be someone’s 72 virgins

    • Jivemaster55

      Wow. Don’t normally do this, but.

      Piece. Appropriate. Neighbor. Piece.

  • UsGotRights

    All terrorists deserve a speedy trial and the death penalty.

  • BearerOfThePainfulTruth

    State police dress in multicam camouflage. Just like our military. Interesting! I think there is more to meet the eye with the way the manhunt went on. There were many reports of people being chased out of their own homes by law enforcement agents. Yet, there was nothing pointing to many of those locations that the suspect was even near there. I saw pictures of women holding children, a law abiding citizens with their hands up in the air as if they were prisoners in their own neighborhoods as they were crowded together on streets. A first step of police state. It is easier to move law abiding citizens around when you disarm them by infringing on their 2nd Amendment rights.

    • Maverick1327

      I live in watertown and was on lock down that day, i commend the police for everything they did, I guess ignorance is bliss these days huh?

    • John Q. Public

      Relax. Despite what Alex Smith and the NRA tells you, no one is infringing on your 2nd Amendment rights.

  • Nancy

    Rolling Stone just lost a bunch of money by doing this. This was not well thought out. I will NEVER touch another copy, and neither will anyone in my 200+ family.

    • Blowback

      Hahaha are you kidding me, Rolling Stone just a got billion dollars of free advertising. It’s never made a better move ever. It was brilliant business-wise.

      • Tommy

        Totally disagree. This will be a loss. People will forget and RS won’t die, but they’re not selling new subscriptions b/c of this.

  • AJ416905

    Those who were/are on Dzhokhar Tsarnaev’s side will use these pictures as part of their propaganda against govt. or the west. I fail to understand any net benefits from releasing these pictures, seeing one wrong doesn’t mean we need to do more wrongs to trump the first wrong.

    • Hal Jordan

      Terrorists will look at this photo and realize the truth, that the real face of terror is a bloody, demoralized loser with a red laser targeting dot on his forehead, about to be taken into custody or terminated. They will realize that they can’t win because we will always fight them and we will always kill or capture them. They will realize that there is nowhere they can run, nowhere they can hide that we can’t find them and kill them. They will realize that every man’s hand is turned against them. That first photo needs to be spread to the four winds and celebrated as a success.

      • PositivePeoplez

        So we have hard evidence of Osama claiming he carried out the 9/11 attacks. Where is this photo of his confession in blood (or a pen marker as other sources say) on the inner side of the boat? Why arent we being shown these to PROVE he had done it? If the media told you they saw a pink elephant fly, you would believe it…

      • Jivemaster55

        Hate to say it, but I disagree. The damage had already been done. Irrelevant that he gave up. They don’t care about anything other than what they were able to “accomplish”. And that is absolutely sickening.

  • Robert Govan

    George Zimmerman hoax, Sandy hook hoax, Boston Hollywood smoke bomb hoax. Order out of chaos…..Wellaware1.com

    • DrColostomy

      nutcake

    • John Q. Public

      I hear there is a sale on tinfoil at your local grocery store. Your hat is looking a little thin, you should probably apply another layer.

  • Guest

    He may be “the devil’s child” – but law enforcement has EARNED a bad name as well: POLICE STATE. Somehoe you law enforcement people think you are above THE CONSTITUTION. WRONG. WE THE PEOPLE will fight for OUR rights. That means we can challenge YOU and YOU HAVE TO TAKE IT. Earn back the respect of The People and maybe you wouldn’t have to deal with The People being angry at YOU. We no longer know who the terrorists are. People are more like to have their homes tossed, be assaulted, shot, killed than they are by any terrorists.

  • PositivePeoplez

    I find it quite strange that Murphy has been relieved of duty. You have to ask – why. Yes, it can be seen as a breach of security, but on the other hand, let’s look back at what the police were telling us at the time this happened. They told us that Tsarnaev had self-inflicted a gun-shot wound to the throat. If this was the case, why is he seen in the photo (with the laser beam on his head) with the energy to stand and give himself up? And we also have that surveillance footage of him stepping out the boat – a bit too much liveliness for someone who just shot themselves in the throat, don’t you think? More obviously.. where is that wound on his throat in the photo? Yes we can see a wound on the side of his throat in the photo of soldiers arresting him, but that’s only after they apprehend him. Suddenly, on the floor, unable to stand, with assisted oxygen intake. Now all of a sudden, Murphy is “under investigation” for leaking these photos. Perhaps, because it tells us a WHOLE different story, to what they told us in the first place.

    Which terrorist has ever carried out an attack and has not taken claim for it? That is the POINT of a terrorist attack – politically motivated, it is not just some random act. They make damn sure their motive is known. For instance, recently in London, an African man, a convert to radical islam, butchered a British soldier in broad daylight, yet stood there and said loudly and clearly why he had done what he had done.

    You don’t attack people and a place under political motivations, and run from the scene leaving people with ambiguity as to why it happened.

    Yes, they say Tsarnaev confessed his actions on the inner side of the boat, and that he confessed on his hospital bed after being arrested… But then why would he suddenly testify “not guilty” in court? You don’t plan an attack on such a scale, with the intent to go unnoticed. You don’t just bomb a city, and casually go back to your dorm room and workout that same night, continuing to live and use facilities in a country you apparently LOATHE.

    This whole thing is a bullshit set-up. And now the Cops/Government are scared that Murphy leaked photos, which has created huge inconsistencies with what Boston police told us at the time.

    The older brother, yes, he seemed to be a likely culprit of all this. But the younger one? Seems too difficult to accuse him, considering all things. I feel he was simply dragged to the marathon by his older brother, who had not unveiled his plans, and only after they were both names suspects on TV, did the older brother admit to the younger that he had indeed carried out those attacks, and out of panic, the younger one fled with the older. (You try tell everybody around you that you’re innocent when your face is being broadcast on every news channel globally as a terrorist). Even more, it was not just a “search” for these suspects, but a “MANHUNT”. What a savage way to word it, and demonize these individuals.

    I am not a conspiracy theorist. I am just seeing this PLAINLY for what it is. I have no definite opinion, but I’ll tell you one thing, I’m certainly not DUMB… This was orchestrated to take away MORE of our rights. I believe the older brother carried out the attack, but was influenced heavily by FBI, as the mother said, they had contacted her years previously, so why didn’t they see this coming? If he had really gotten information to build pressure-cooker bombs from an online “terrorist magazine”, surely they must have seen this as a red flag? Especially considering Snowden recently told us they have been surveilling internet and phone use, especially to non-US citizens. Most don’t even REALIZE the freedoms that have been stripped of us since 9/11 (Thank You Snowden, for showing us we actually had no privacy whatsoever in our calls and internet use). And now, more will be taken away.

    I mean, we all sat in the city of Boston during lockdown, wilfully, with no pre-warning. Soldiers and humvees with turrets dominated our streets. Soldiers invaded homes and treated residents as criminals asking them to get out with their hands up while they searched the premises. Freedom? Yeah right.

    • Jivemaster55

      I TOTALLY agree. And I just subliminally bought a Coke, an electronic monetary blackout is coming, I saw a chemtrail on my morning drive, a royal reptilian alien is about to be born, I flew over the Bermuda triangle recently, obviously no one has ever been to the moon (other than the little green Roswell guys), the Pentagon releases horrible diseases, and I know who was on the grassy knoll.

      • PositivePeoplez

        So you are comparing my belief that the younger Tsarnaev brother was not part of the attack… to typical conspiracy bullshit? How does that make sense? You are obviously looking at my previous opinion only as “I AM ANTI-GOVERNMENT.” So closed minded, but oh well.

        • Jivemaster55

          Nope. Doesn’t have anything to do with the government. I am saying you are a conspiracy theorist. And saying you are not bolsters it.

          • PositivePeoplez

            Oh please shut up, you have no argument against my points so you choose to play the quick & easy card of “oh he’s just a conspiracy nut”. What a WEAK opposition you make.

          • PositivePeoplez

            Can you give me ONE piece of evidence that assumes the younger Tsarnaev brother blew off the bomb? Early 90s bombing of the trade center, the radical and extreme islamic terrorists made it loud and clear they did it. 9/11, the same kind of terrorists made it loud and clear they did it. The murder of soldier Lee Rigby in England, the terrorists made it loud and clear they did it. These people take PRIDE in their attacks, and do it out of POLITICAL MOTIVATION… How is an ambiguous attack proving ANYTHING at all? How can an ambiguous attack push political goals of those who carry them out.. if they haven’t stated their motive of the attack?

            As I said, in a politically motivated attack (AKA a terrorist attack) is not a case of “oh im going to blow this marathon up and hope no one knows it was me or why I did it just because it makes me feel good, and then im going back to my American college and to my American friends, work out in the gym and go to a dorm party”

            Because that sounds like a radical, right? A terrorist who supposedly HATES America… bombs a marathon… Stays in America… and then attends a party. where their are girls. alcohol. and possibly drugs. Sounds like he really hates the Western way of life… Sounds to me like your typical radical extremist terrorist who hates anything outside the boundaries of Islam [Sarcasm].

            Get real. If you honestly think this kid was a politically motivated radical extremist, then you are nothing but dumb – an insult to your own intelligence.

            But they’re telling us, oh, he suddenly decided to confess in his blood on the inner side of the boat. And oh, he confessed on his hospital bed. But when he’s in court, he’s suddenly pleading not guilty.

            If you carry out an attack like that, you would not give two thoughts about dying. You would consider yourself a martyr. So why would the younger Tsarnaev brother run? The 7-11 they apparently robbed, was not robbed by them, but somebody else, the 7-11 store manager even gave a statement saying so. Look it up.

            If the major news outlets told you blue was green, and green was black, you would believe it. Because you take everything they say fact for fact, without asking questions, or thinking about it twice. Just because this situation might satisfy your own political motivations as a person, doesn’t mean you should totally agree with it for that sake… because you are agreeing with a bunch of liars. And a bunch of liars really don’t give two cents about your well-being.

            Obama is targeting terrorist groups in Pakistan with unarmed drones. If the gov thinks they are in a certain location, they will drone it, regardless if there are innocent civilians (including women, the elderly, children). What would happen if this was happening on home soil? While the boston attack has such a huge impact on people across the whole of America, why can we sit back and justify the EVERY DAY drone killings of innocent people and children abroad?

            It’s a very double-standard world we live in, and you have to thank the government for presenting it to you in such a way as “whoever does bad to us, is an enemy. but we can do bad to the rest of the world as we please, because we simply don’t tell you about it.”

  • tomncoffee

    He may be “the devil’s child” – but law enforcement has EARNED a bad name as well: POLICE STATE. Somehow you law enforcement people think you are above THE CONSTITUTION. WRONG. WE THE PEOPLE will fight for OUR rights. That means we can challenge YOU and YOU HAVE TO TAKE IT. Earn back the respect of The People and maybe you wouldn’t have to deal with The People being angry at YOU. We no longer know who the terrorists are. People are more like to have their homes tossed, be assaulted, shot, killed by THE POLICE than they are by any terrorists.

  • v-aaharr@outlook.com

    I feel most of the people being moved did not mind as they probably weren’t thrilled with the prospect of a heavily armed homicidal maniac that left his own brother behind. Oh yeah on top of that, killed a cop, stole a car, and admitted to planting not one but two bombs that despite “Only killing 3” people drastically changed the lives of hundreds. When you shut down all the exits stuff gets done. What if they hadn’t and he had made it to New York, then Chicago?

    • tomncoffee

      We will never know who killed who. We are being fed a narrative. These new photos mess up that narrative, that’s why the guy got fired for releasing the photos that contradict the narrative THE POLICE STATE wants you to buy into which thes photos obviously contradict.

      • v-aaharr@outlook.com

        Police State, stop conspiracizing, what happens when you have a robber in your house, are they too communist to call?

      • Maverick1327

        It makes me sad that half of the people on this site are so ignorant. IM FROM WATERTOWN!!!! No rights were infringed on, i was on lock down for my own safety, the police were respectful but also cautious as can be. Boston and Massachusetts in general are far from being a police state, trust me.

        • v-aaharr@outlook.com

          I also have an old roommate living in Boston, I was on pins and needles hoping he was okay. I fully support like you do how it was handled. I won’t like I fist pumped when he was caught and let a ‘merica! slip out.

        • The_Alarm_Clock

          LOL

        • Blowback

          Jesus christ Maverick no one cares where you are from, you are a scary sicko if you believe you “were on lockdown for your own safety”. It was one criminal hiding in a boat. He wasn’t even found by the cops but by a resident having a cigarette on his porch.

          • Maverick1327

            Blowback your a Moron…I also have a father who is a retired K-9 and DOD officer. I know how things work. Get your shit straight before yu tell me I’m the sicko, why does everyhting have to be a conspiracy. We were on lockdown because they could have had more bombs, they were planning on going to NYC that night to cause more damage there.

    • Conrad Osticator

      If he had made it to Chicago and just started shooting young black men, would anyone have noticed? Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson definitely wouldn’t.

  • hateidiotsonthisthread

    @nick330 your and idiot along with all the other idiots who think this kid deserves anything more then imprionsonment and a life a miserey! your in america if you want to believe your government is behind everything and against there own people then leave.

    • John Q. Public

      Most Americans believe that it is appropriate to capitalize “America.” It is embarrassing enough to the rest of us when you exhibit your xenophobia, but even more so when you appear illiterate in doing so.

  • v-aaharr@outlook.com

    Also for those saying no throat wound second to last picture left side of the neck, under the gauze pad being held to the bloody spot.

    • The_Alarm_Clock

      Wow….

  • jjca

    Hahahahaha, little jihadi punk hid in a boat and surrendered like a little girl….

  • TeamInfidel

    Make no mistake…there is NO such thing as a “war on terrorism”. Terrorism is simply a tactic. The “who” are devoted muslims like this animal and the “why” is the cult ideology called Islam.

    Got Islam??

  • Eli257

    I disagree with those who say that the RS article whitewashes or is not clear about the development of Dzhokhar Tsarnaev.

    These factors played a role:

    1. a religion with values that provide reprieve from Western decadence

    2. a patriarchial culture, weak father, and older brother who becomes father figure

    3. an uneducated mother who decides that the likely mental illness of her older son is best healed through religion

    4. an older brother soaking in sermons of a radical friend, Islamist literature, and conspiracy-theory websites

    5. intercultural adjustment and identity-formation issues

    6. parents abondonning their children

    7. superficial high-school friends who smoke pot, don’t share confidences, and don’t respond to indications of distress

    8. a country where education expenses divide wealthy and poor

    9. questionable foreign-policy decisions

    10. an overwhelmed 19 year old without a spine (“pillow-soft” as the article states) but with access to ammunition and bomb-making instructions

    • Blowback

      Put foreign policy in first place.

    • Conrad Osticator

      Good try Dumbass. Just blame it on everything except the little scumbag’s personal choices.

      • Eli257

        It’s one of the items on my list (if you read carefully). But you can’t think that this 19 year old’s actions can be explained by pointing only to his personal choices.

    • John Q. Public

      Put the blame where it belongs – a kid making stupid decisions. There are plenty of immigrant children growing up in worse environments who do not make the decision to kill and maim, regardless of U.S. foreign policy, educational opportunities, identity-formation issues, etc. I resent that you appear to be trying to excuse his conduct by making excuses for it.

      • Eli257

        You are right: Ultimately, it’s the kid’s stupid decisions. But this 19-year-old’s decisions were impacted by a decade of adverse and unfortunate things that happened to him (including weak father, uneducated mother, insane brother, culture that exerted pressure, etc.). My post was an attempt to understand what may lead to the stupid decisions the kid made–not an attempt to divert blame. He is to be blamed, but so are–to some extent–all the other people and incidents that influenced him.

        • John Q. Public

          Seeking understanding is one thing. Your post sounded like you were excusing and I wanted to make sure that we didn’t accept excusing it. When the whole thing is said and done it should be studied for both the factors involved and the warning signs so it can be prevented in the future, I just don’t want those factors to be seen as an excuse for what he did.

    • Sam West

      If Western decadence is such a problem that stay in your savage pious murderous homeland.

      • Eli257

        We have the same homeland . . .

  • Andrea
  • Darbwg

    Rolling Stone wants us to see him as a rock star.

    This officer wants us to see him as a useful idiot, a pawn to evil men.

    When I was listening to this standoff on the radio, the scene was pretty clearly set and reported. It sounded like a situation of a scared kid. It sounded as though it was going to be a question of whether the boy would kill himself or give up.

    If he were a real heartless terrorist, he’d have killed himself. Turns out he’s just a coward and a useful idiot scumbag playing second fiddle to a real terrorist.

    He’s less rock star, less terrorist, more dirtbag, and more idiot.

    • Ralfine

      Or maybe the issue is old and they were told to provoke an angry mob, for a few bucks?

  • Blowback

    I think it is clear that a country that votes for Presidents who send drones and missiles to melt the flesh off the skulls of living 6 year old girls in Pakistani villages, is gonna piss off some muslims and get bomed once in a while.

    • Sam West

      This country voted for presidents who carried out military action that not only melted the flesh off the bones of 6 year old girls but did it on a scale of 200,000+ people in Japan during WW2. No one got pissed off – Japan is one of the friendliest nations that our country has. World War 2 was the last time the US had the balls to defend itself properly.

      We get bombed once in a while precisely because we DO NOT go after our enemies in their holes out of an illegitimate concern for their children and wedding parties not the lives of American people.

      • Blowback

        World War 2 was the last time the US was attacked by another country’s military. Continue believing the current military is not just a bunch of rubes, babykillers, and dupes. No one else buys it.

    • Maverick1327

      WOW full of ignorance today, what about a president who starts two wars on terrorism as cover for oil? Sound familiar? Sound like someone you might have voted for a few years ago?

      • Blowback

        I don’t vote. And if you do, for any of the major parties, you’re complicit.

        • Maverick1327

          You not voting makes you just as complicit…two sides to every coin my friend. So instead your someone who bitches and moans but never does anything to help foster change.

          • Blowback

            This comment has been removed for violating our commenting policy.

          • Maverick1327

            Yah sorry don’t buy it, again your one of many people in this country that could help change, but instead you choose not to vote and then moan about “murdering c****”. I 5th of the population actually votes maybe if we got it up to say 3 5ths we’d see some legitimate change…

  • Geezergardener

    The real face of terrorism? Where are the bloody pictures of the dead bodies after a drone strike where dozens of people including small children are killed time and time again? Want to see the true face of terrorism America? Look in the mirror.

    • kiethcw

      I agree

    • Blowback

      Exactly. Or look in the voting booth where the blind sheeple go and vote for drone murderer (R) or drone murderer (D). Everybody who votes is complicit in this terror. But they’d rather watch American Idol.

      Can you even imagine being in a Pakistani wedding party, and then from nowhere, out of the sky, a rich high tech nation hundreds of times richer than your nation, sends an armed robot drone from the sky, to drop FIRE on you and melt the faces off the skulls of your six year old daughter?

      This is why the terrorists hate us. They hate us because we collectively gang rape the muslim world daily.

      • Sam West

        No they hate us because we don’t bow to Allah. Pakistani people should think about what government they support before having a wedding celebration. If it is a govenrment that harbors mass murderers like Bin Laden then they should expect to be in the crosshairs of American weapons.

        • Blowback

          And the people of Boston should expect to be in the crosshairs because their government starts unjustified wars against muslims.

          What’s good for the goose? mr. warmongering sicko?

          Your unsophisticated view of the rationale for terror attacks is stuck in, I don’t know, about 2002 State of the Union address? You don’t seem to have much of an understanding beyond what simpleton fools like Bush were spouting a long time back.

          • LouAnnWatson

            so should we now blow up the mosque since we are such unfeeling neanderthals?

      • LouAnnWatson

        they shouldn’t hang around with terrorists, just like people shouldn’t hang around with drug dealers. there will be violence…

    • Sam West

      That’s not terrorism. Those people and small children are casualties of war that THEIR country is waging on us. Their blood is on the hands of THEIR government. Retaliatory use of force is not only moral but obligatory.

    • v-aaharr@outlook.com

      I recommend talking to a soldier in Afganistan who has had to face grown, men, women and children with bombs and guns. The Al Queida has made it so you cannot discern between innocent and militant. Drone strikes save thousands of US lives, but If you would rather send the soldiers out, I recommend you for the job of delivering the flag their families.

      • Blowback

        Are you kidding me? “had to face”, people who sign up to fight in America’s wars of lies CHOOSE to join the military pal. Don’t give me this “had to face” garbage. No we’d rather not inspire more anti-american sentiment by killing people with drones without charge or trial thank you. You can take your mindless neocon warmongering attitude and wake up to your stupid self. NO ONE HAS DIED FOR OUR FREEDOM SINCE WORLD WAR 2.

        • v-aaharr@outlook.com

          You are a moron and insult to this country. The soldiers that lay their lives on the line according to you deserve to die? This is a country where we free to have an opinion so I respect that. But I myself will continue to salute our soldiers.

          • Blowback

            If you sign up to fight for pointless wars, your death is in vain. There has been no threat to our freedom since Hitler was alive. Wake up.

        • LouAnnWatson

          mindless neocon warmongering ? obama is a neocon. wow, i just didn’t know.

      • The_Alarm_Clock

        America created Al -Qaeda

        • v-aaharr@outlook.com

          Close, we just armed them in the 70’s and then pulled support creating this problem in the first place.

          • The_Alarm_Clock

            You’re whitewashing it. It’s much worse than that.

    • Maverick1327

      This is a valid point, i can’t argue that we have been responsible for the deaths of innocent people over seas. Mirror looking should be done extensively. America is not innocent, specifically our government. But the people that were injured and killed because of this kid were.

    • Jivemaster55

      Rubbish.

  • Doctor Sahn

    Never let the fact get in the way of a good story!

  • Gloria A. Rogers

    Hooray for the independent action of this policeman to show these real pictures of the creep! It’s an outrage for him to be on the cover of RS.

  • TeamInfidel

    This is the internal threat of devoted muslims who want nothing to do with freedom and democracy.

    Face it…wherever Islam shows up, it brings nothing other than death, destruction, a 7th century mentality, and a total disregard for all human and women’s rights.

    • BigAl1825

      Your comment could just as easily apply to Christianity, any many other religions.

      • LouAnnWatson

        and the Christians that are currently blowing people up are?

        • Blowback

          Ah, the christians who are being bombed by the US are?

        • BigAl1825

          Plotting and planning in a cabin in a red state near you right now.

      • TeamInfidel

        Sure…all those Jews and Chritisns that strap bombs to themselves, recite passages from their holy texts and then blow themselves up…sure, it happens all the time.

        Got Islam??

        • BigAl1825

          It does happen, and has happened. Many American home-grown terrorists are of exactly this sort. People simply say “oh, they aren’t REAL Christians.” But of course, that’s exactly what mainstream Muslims say about extremists in their own religion.

          • TeamInfidel

            Well, let’s put that into perspective…shall we??

            The facts is that Islam is associated with Islamic terrorism because that is the association that the terrorists like these Boston bombers CHOOSE to make.

            You muslim appeasers who compare
            crime committed by people who happen to be nominal members of other religions to religious terror committed EXPILICITLY in the name of Islam are comparing apples to oranges.

            Yes, some of the abortion clinic bombers were religious (as Muslim appeasers love pointing out), but consider the scope of the problem. There were FIVE deadly attacks over a 35 year period in the U.S. 7 people died. This is an average of one death every five years. I will say again…ONE!!

            By contrast, Islamic terrorists like these two animals have staged over 20,000 documented DEADLY attacks around the globe in just the 12 years following September 11th, 2001 for the glory of their allah!

            That’s right…DEADLY attacks made on behalf of their allah as they yell out “allahu akbar” as these savages kill! If one goes back to 1971, when Muslim armies in Bangladesh began the mass slaughter of Hindus, through the years of Jihad in the Sudan, Kashmir and Algeria, and the present-day Sunni-Shia violence in Iraq, the number of innocents killed in the name of Islam probably exceeds 8,000,000 over this same period.

            In the last 12 years just since 9/11/01, there have been perhaps a dozen or so religiously-inspired killings by people of all other faiths (other than ISLAM) COMBINED.

            Got ISLAM???

          • TeamInfidel

            What nonsense! It is so obvious that Islam is a detestable and violent form of indoctrination masquerading as a “religion of peace”.

            Why is it that present day politicians and muslim appeasers like you continue to be blinded and refuse to take note of what is painfully obvious to what is the cause for 95% of all world wide attacks and KILLINGS made on behalf of a whack cult ideology called ISLAM.

            Got ISLAM??

          • BigAl1825

            Islam is no different than Christianity or Judaism, both of which have extremists. They all share a common origin, and share the same foundation texts and fundamental principles.

            I am not a “Muslim appeaser,” you ignoramus. Today it’s Islam, yesterday it was Christianity, tomorrow it will be Scientology. It’s all the same. The fundamental problem is religion, of any sort, especially those which espouse ignorance. Focusing on Islam misses the point, entirely. Islam is used as a tool by extremists, just as Christianity is used as a tool by extremists in the U.S. to oppress the rights of women, gays, and not too long, blacks, Jews, and more.

            Also, “95%,” do tell where that figure comes from? Oh, out of your butt? Thought so. Your BS stat shows that you are nothing more than a pile of crap. Now go climb back into the hole you crawled out of, dung beetle, and spew your xenophobic ignorance there.

          • TeamInfidel

            More Pig’s Crap! Islam is associated with Islamic terrorism because that is the association that the terrorists (like these Boston MUSLIM bombers) themselves CHOOSE to make.

            Muslims and appeasers like you who compare
            crime committed by people who happen to be nominal members of other religions to religious terror committed EXPILICITLY in the name of Islam are comparing apples to oranges.

            In just the years since 9/11/01, Islamic
            terrorists have staged over 20,000 documented DEADLY attacks around the globe for the glory of their allah! That’s right…DEADLY attacks made on behalf of their allah as these animals yell out “allahu akbar” as these savages kill!

            In the last 13 years, there have been perhaps a dozen or so religiously-inspired killings by people of all other faiths (other than ISLAM) COMBINED.

            95% is too low…99% would be a better and more accurate number!

          • BigAl1825

            So is it 95% or 99%? It can’t be both. Oh, wait, that’s right, you COMPLETELY MADE IT UP. Just like you made up the ‘20,000 attacks’ figure.

            In other words, you are completely full of crap. You are more dangerous than any terrorist.

            The actual number of documented terrorist attacks each year numbers in the hundreds. And so does the number of people killed in a typical year.

            http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patterns_of_Global_Terrorism

            And that’s including ALL terrorist attacks, including the Christians.

    • Blowback

      Which is why you support dropping Hellfire missiles on the families of 7th century fanatics. That will learn them right. Couldn’t possibly create more terrorists with a BushObama foreign policy right? No….. never….

      • LouAnnWatson

        kind of a catch 22, kill more create more kill more, eventually you’ll run out.

        • Blowback

          nice logic fuck stick.

          • LouAnnWatson

            name calling you’re disqualified. touched a nerve there i think

      • TeamInfidel

        Sure…muslims have been at war with everybody not-muslim-enough and of course, us non-belivers of Islam and sharia law for nearly 1,400 years when their self proclaimed, terrorist, pedophile mohammad started this cult!

        Finally, we started fighting back against this cult madness in just the last 12 years!!

        Got islam??

      • TeamInfidel

        So do you have an issue of FINALLY fighting back against these whacked MUSLIMS?? I sure don’t. You make it sound that we started this Islamic JIHAD and it is our fault. Right?

        Really??….

        In the past 30-some years the US has been attacked not necessarily by a country, but by islamic radicals. Now…pay attention.. If the US is creating “more terrorists”, don’t you want to find out exactly at WHAT POINT this all occurred?

        Was it during the Iran crisis, US barracks attack in Lebanon, the first WTC bombing in 1993, US barracks attack in saudi arabia, etc.??

        It would be inept to just include the years of Bush’s presidency and exclude at least 30 previous years of history, right? Go ahead and do some simple research and you will discover 1,000’s of pages of terrorists attacks including bombings of airplaines, various executions of hundreds of Americans, hijackings of airplanes, etc.

        For you to assume that we are creating “more terrorists” NOW is ignorant and uninformed.

        Are we creating “new terrorists” like these Boston whacked muslms? After you learn the ample facts, if you are honest you will then say correctly say, “NO”. I guess the world is only starting to pay MORE attention to MUSLIM terrorism NOW, thus giving the perception that all of a sudden “more terrorists” are killing and attacking.

        As an example, I think a lot of us turned a blind eye to the bombinb of our US soldier’s barracks in lebanon, 1983, as they conducted peace operations. SURELY, TOO MANY PEOPLE FORGOT ABOUT THE FIRST MUSLIM WORLD TRADE CENTER BOMBING OF 1993. Oh wait… those don’t count, right?

  • timetogohome

    The intent of the RS cover was to show that evil sometimes appears to be innocent. It’s a lesson that all of us in Boston should have learned. It’s a lesson that was somehow lost on this Sargeant as well as the mayor. How can basic interpretation of intent have become so reactionary? There seems to have been a serious lack of critical thinking on the part of the public. What is worse is that THESE new photographs are those that portray “the bomber” exactly as he would like. In these photos he is the wounded soldier, fighting for his cause. Muslim extremists do not want to be portrayed as rock stars; it’s against all that they stand for. But now this officer has portrayed him as a martyr-type: THIS is just what he wants. The mayor, this officer and a good percentage of the public have shown a stunning lack of understanding of how culture and violence work. As victims, we once had the whole country behind us, now we are beginning to look like fools.

    • PDQuig

      You’re an effin’ idiot: the point of the RS cover was a crass move to sell magazines. They didn’t care how airbrushed this pr*ck’s actions were and didn’t consider how hurtful this picture would be to the families of the victims.

      Why do you want to be a victim, you dumb liberal? You’re a fool and need a serious @ss-whipping.

      • timetogohome

        Well you’re a very thoughtful young person PDQ…. How about making a considered response to any of the points I make? Because, based on your response, I think that maybe You are an “effin’ idiot”, so there!

        • LouAnnWatson

          in his defense, the cover picture was airbrushed, whereas these real pictures were not.

          • timetogohome

            Point taken. But who benefits from which kinds of photographs? Just something to think about.

    • Ruths_Husband_Ben

      Absolute horseshit. If you work at it a little bit, sport, you can find the article that goes with the picture and it is a love letter from an adoring bumble-headed teenage girl. But nice try, dipshit.

      • timetogohome

        Ah very nice! Another mature, thoughtful response. Love it!

    • LouAnnWatson

      it’s reality

  • Jim

    Hey, you know it isn’t pretty, and in reality, it really isn’t pretty … but people should be able to confront reality. I say show both sides, if you are going to show the good, show the bad. I’m not talking about presenting things to children that they can’t understand, so let’s not bring up some ridiculous and wild claim … but I’m talking about adults being able to access and view reality, even if it is unpleasant, if they don’t want to they don’t have to, but if they want to, they should be able to .. would eliminate all the wild rhetoric people throw back and forth, without actually knowing the full extent of things.

  • ben dover

    i thought he had an injured throat? Anybody notice that?

    • v-aaharr@outlook.com

      Second to last picture left side of the neck

    • Blowback

      Yes we need clearer info about this. Apparently he was able to speak in court the other day, so what happened there?

      • v-aaharr@outlook.com

        It’s been a few months people heal

  • Dave Schiel

    It seems to me that everyone is off subject, it’s not about guilty or innocent it’s about the rolling stone photo glorifying the terror “suspect” and in turn possibly causing a nutcase to become a copycat. I am glad that the police are better people than I am because if I was a 911 dispatcher or an officer and I got a call from the rolling stone asking when help would arrive my response would be “how about never, is never good for you? Yes in that case they would be better people than I because they wouldn’t do that, they would walk into the line of fire for them the same as they would for anyone else.

    • Ralfine

      You really think a magazine cover is glory?

      • Blowback

        In a country where people would basically cream their pants to have their 15 minutes of fame, they see global infamy as a mass murderer terrorist as something to be jealous of.

    • Blowback

      Isn’t it amazing that even your revenge fantasies involve being a government worker denying government services. Are you some kind of big government guy or something? Government wars, government dispatchers, government police state stormtroopers, government’s role to protect you from ‘copy cats’…. you’re a fool.

      • LouAnnWatson

        you know, people might listen if you stopped denigrating them

    • BigAl1825

      But it’s not just Rolling Stone glorifying the terrorist, it’s the entire media, and this article. Attacking Rolling Stone, specifically, is off the subject. Psychologists have stated over, and over, and over again that the key way to prevent copycat killers, sensationalist, publicity-seeking type stunts, is to not plaster the faces of these people all of the front page.

      But that’s exactly what they do, all of them, including this very article. Until we pass a law restricting this aspect of free speech, I don’t see anything changing. I’m certain that media competing for views and clicks are not going to do it on their own.

      • Blowback

        Hey guess what, your utopian social engineering “psychologist approved” scheme to censor the media in the hopes of not inspiring a POSSIBLE copycat, is not as important as freedom of the press in the United States. You need to just get used to that OK, because we don’t live in a social science technocracy, designed to create a copycat free utopia, we live in a country where I wanna know who the criminal was, what he looked like, and not be hectored by fools like you who want to take away my right to read the news, in favor of you crafting a “psychologist approved” message. F YOU.

        • LouAnnWatson

          touched a nerve their i think…name calling proves you just lost the argument

          • Blowback

            This comment has been removed for violating our commenting policy.

        • BigAl1825

          You sound like a future terrorist. I’ll have you added to the Watch List.

      • John Q. Public

        Sure, once we pass a law infringing on the 1st Amendment we’ll all be safe and secure.

        • standlikearock

          Actually, there are already restrictions on the First Amendment, and the most common example is that it is not ‘free speech’ to yell ‘fire!’ in a crowded theater… So, yes, you can have rational, logical, and important restrictions to the first amendment without losing your ability to practice ‘free speech’ – you have to be rational, not reactionary…

        • BigAl1825

          OK, so if you want to ignore the advice of the experts who study these people, what is your solution?

          The only alternative is that we accept that these actions are going to occur, and that rags like Rolling Stone and Boston Mag are going to try to profit off of the events.

          I’m fine with that, personally, because I recognize that the risk of these events is minimal. I’m not really willing to sacrifice any of my freedoms for them. But I don’t think this cultural environment is healthy for any of us who are a part of and partake in it.

          • John Q. Public

            Don’t necessarily disagree with you, but sacrificing our freedom for illusory security is a Faustian bargain that I’m not prepared to make – and it sounds like its not one you’re willing to make either. Accept that the world is a dangerous place and try to understand it and cope with it – not hide from it – is the only solution I would offer..

  • doriangrey11
  • guest

    The rolling stone cover is completely ridiculous, not only because of the photo but also because of the text: How a popular student, promising student Was failed by his family, Fell into radical terror… since when RS has psychology experts in their editorial? It is even more ironic to ask a fundamentally hard question in a fundamentally superfluous magazine. Not to add that the premise of popular, cool, and promising are at the very least debatable.

  • zufjj ased

    The USA so inhuman !!!

    What happen this human rights and your democracy ?

    Guantanamo,Prism and now Tsarnaev pictures, which shows an strong injured criminal, you are so sick !

    • Political Dookie

      This comment has been removed for violating our commenting policy.

      • Blowback

        The USA has tried ‘death to islam’, it just brought death to Boston and New York. Continue believing your current stance is going to somehow stop the violence though.

        • Political Dookie

          No, we have pretended that islam isn’t the problem.

          • Blowback

            You pretend people angry at your government raping their lands is not the problem. And continue to rape their lands.

          • LouAnnWatson

            i don’t see the mulims in oil rich countries complaining about raping their lands, only the radicals and zealots

          • Isabella Adamowicz

            You are destructing your own lands, Syria is no more, Lebanon on the brink, so is Egypt and Libya.

        • Isabella Adamowicz

          Why don’t you stop your own violence ? You countries one by one descending in to the chaos.

      • zufjj ased

        I’m not a muslim, so it don’t touch me. I’m from Germany and I believe that you lost your principles of human rights (showing such pics) and democracy. Most people in Germany think now so. At 9/11 Germany stand close behind you, but come back to democracy and human rights again.

    • Isabella Adamowicz

      We should not injure terrorists? Oh, so sorry.

      • zufjj ased

        When you injure or even kill a terrorist in the moment of the arrest or attac it is of course okay. But to show such pictures is inhuman. In Germany a photographer from the police would maybe go in jail if he publish such pictures in a journal without to pixelate the face.
        Beside that the treatment of prisoners (e.g. Guantanomo without any trial) is very inhuman.

  • Al

    Rolling Stone Magazine was originally about Music, with photos of musicians, and info on music.

    When it comes to glamorizing Murderers and Terrorists, they should back off, give their heads a shake. Why wasn’t say a photo-collage of the dead 4 victims used on the cover instead? Or a picture of the Bombing victims at the Boston Marathon? Or another subject entirely!!!

    Rolling Stone Mag really, really needs to stick to just music.
    RS editors probably think they’re too big a company to bother listening to our indignation at their flagrance.
    Regardless, this cover has disgusted me so much that I will boycott RS permanently. I hope others will join me and let our collective spending power be felt by one of the largest most successful Music magazines.

  • Julie

    As the attorney states innocent until proven guilty is applicable only in a court of law. When there are hundred of victims and hundereds of eye witnesses then he is guitly plain and simple. If there wasn’t camera footage and hundreds of eye witness then there would be reasonable doubt. He had no regard for human life and feels no remorse. He will get his day in court but if you think there is any chance he will be found innocent you are dillusional. His lawyers know he is guilty they are just going to fight against the death penalty. I’m sure the RS cover makes him even more proud of himself for what he has done. That sends a message to other would be terrorists who would be happy to kill all of us.

    • Blowback

      And your vote for a BushObama foreign policy sends the message to Muslims that you are happy for the drones to kill them, hence sending the message to them that you are fair game.

      • Julie

        I do not condone the killing of innocent people by anyone is any way but 2 wrongs don’t make a right.

        • Blowback

          I never said they did. I believe muslim criminals like the bomber should be put in prison. I also believe Obama and Bush should be put in prison. They are all murderers.

          • LouAnnWatson

            by that illogic, if you consume petroleum products, so are you

          • Blowback

            This comment has been removed for violating our commenting policy.

      • LouAnnWatson

        muslim propagandist

      • Isabella Adamowicz

        Are you trying to scare us? Look at your own countries, at each others throats, all of them.

  • v-aaharr@outlook.com

    These pictures that are posted are great. They show the dirty consequences instead of the glory filled propaganda that caused whats his name to do this. He was captured when he realized “crap, there is no blaze of glory”

    • Blowback

      Because being a household name worldwide as the ‘Boston Bomber’ is coating oneself in “glory”. You fucking fool.

      • v-aaharr@outlook.com

        I am sure lot’s of people would love to be slumped over cowering in boat. He thought he would die quickly and when that didn’t happen he gave up as a pathetic injured kid. And if being the side of justice for a kid charged with bombing and killing a police officer is fool hardy, then hell yes I am.

        • Blowback

          “He thought he would die quickly”. Did you ask him that did you?

          • LouAnnWatson

            muslim sympathizer…do you display your palestinian flag proudly?

          • Blowback

            I sympathize with all of the millions of people whose faces have been melted off by US bombs, Japanese civilians, Vietnamese villagers, Korean kids, Iraqi kids, whoever.

            Yes. I also believe the bomber deserves life in prison.

          • Isabella Adamowicz

            We have to ask him? Good ridens to the scum.

    • LouAnnWatson

      well, there would have been if he had raised his gun…

  • ……

    Why does the blood look fake?

    • Andylit

      Because its real. You’ve probably never seen real blood.

      • ……

        Andylit, you’re so witty, how does that work with you’re mom?

    • annebeth66

      I agree it looks fake, like food coloring & corn syrup, used for Halloween costume blood.

    • ME-B

      I thought the same thing. It’s awfully bright red considering how long he was in that boat

  • David Maciejewski

    Its a magazine cover. Its an article trying to deduce how this kid turned to this. What triggered. As far as glorifying him, I dont see this as glorifying it showing him as a ‘normal’ kid prior to the bombing. I am sure there are many publications throughout the Middle East and his homeland that have glamorized he and his brother.

    • Blowback

      Yes I am sure there are many publications in the Middle East who glamorize those who fight back against the US’s violence against the Middle East.

      • Isabella Adamowicz

        US violence against the Middle East? There are more that 100 thousand killed just in Syria in the last two years, millions o refugees.

        • Blowback

          By a puppet dictator the US propped up for decades in Syria.

    • Andylit

      How sad for you. It appears that you are the target market for the cover and the magazine.

      The article is a grotesque example of the progressive penchant for allowing heinous criminals to blame their behavior of anyone, everyone, as long as they don’t take any personal responsibility.

      The cover shot is is “Hot Bad Boy” 101. It places resident evil on the same plane with Jagger and Morrison.

      Wake up.

      • Blowback

        This comment has been removed for violating our commenting policy.

        It’s a magazine that sometimes does feature articles on political issues and non music things. You don’t even read it, haven’t bought one in years, so shut the fuck up. Being known as The Boston Bomber is not on the same plane as Mick Jagger you fucking cunt, and if I were Mick Jagger I’d sue you for defamation.

        • Andylit

          I’ve read the RS article. I’ve read other “life stories” about him. The RS article is a liberal hack job that blames all of the world for his actions.

          I thought personal responsibility was important to libertarians. How very ironic.

          I find it amusing that a self proclaimed libertarian is telling me to shut up. How very ironic.

          I believe that you are anti-war, but from your post it is quite obvious that you have no clue what libertarianism is all about.

          • Blowback

            I hold the killer responsible for his crime. I have said he belongs in prison. What more do you fucking want? Understanding someone’s life is not harming the situation.

            I can tell you to shut the fuck up, so what? it’s not backed by government force so I am still allowed to say it. It’s a suggestion.

          • Andylit

            Have you ever wondered why no one takes you seriously? Treats you like a child? Considers your comments to be infantile and formulaic?

            No? sigh. I didn’t think so.

          • Blowback

            Your opinion on my comments is something I care about a lot. Please keep making suggestions.

        • LouAnnWatson

          you certainly fell into some bucket of crap

  • disqus_4fYpwIITOy

    These are the pics that should have been posted in the first place. Love the red dot on him! Nice job, Mr. Murphy. If anyone disagrees with what you did as far as releasing/posting these pics, they shouldn’t be allowed to live in USA, never mind Boston.

    • Blowback

      Of course you “love the red dot on him”, you’re a bloodthirsty sicko cheering on the police state and it is dolts like you who are shoveling soil on the grave of the founding fathers’ vision for this once great land.

      • disqus_4fYpwIITOy

        What the heck is a dolt? “bloodthirsty” – no, just like to see people pay for the “blood” they already spilled. If this country wasn’t as messed up as it already is, he never would have been allowed to enter this country in the first place. I bed the founding father’s are rolling over in their graves at what is allowed to happen to Americans.

        • Blowback

          Google what a dolt is if you don’t know what it is you fucking dolt.

          I repeat, you’re a bloodthirsty dolt.

      • Andylit

        Yeah, right up to the point that you discover that one of his victims was your mother/father/sister/brother/friend/coworker, etc, etc.

        At that moment you’ll be screaming “Pull the trigger! Pull the friggin trigger!”

        • Blowback

          Because you assume that like you, I’m all for proxy violence carried out by the state. No, I don’t believe in killing unarmed teens, I think prison will do just fine.

          • disqus_4fYpwIITOy

            You’re obviously not from Boston nor have you experienced anything even remotely as devastating at this. When you understand the scope of what happened, then you have the right to comment on what happens to this “unarmed teen”. I suppose you’re one of those that believe the Holocaust didn’t happen either.

          • Andylit

            Actually, I assumed that you were a normal human being. My apologies.

          • LouAnnWatson

            he was unarmed? you were their? i think he’s charged with blowing up unarmed civilians

        • disqus_4fYpwIITOy

          YUP! this guy brought anything that happens to him upon himself. his actions hurt, maimed and killed people. he gets whatever is coming to him. its called consequence, people. I know these days the spoiled bratty generation don’t understand but hopefully at some point in life you will. and hopefully it won’t take an awful, horrible tragedy like the Boston Bombing for you to get your head out of your ***.

          • Blowback

            So if Obama’s actions hurt, maimed and killed people he gets “whatever is coming” too?

          • LouAnnWatson

            ok by me

      • LouAnnWatson

        bang…oh well, show trial

  • LouAnnWatson

    these comments just indicate that the biggest politically correct apologists and conspiracy theorists are still on the left. In Boston, none the less!

  • annebeth66

    It has been almost a year (07-20-12) since the Aurora CO shooting by James Holmes and the media splashed his photo with his bright orange hair everywhere. This man killed 12 people and injured 70 but I did not hear the same outcry about his photo, as we are hearing about Tsarnaev. The people of Boston act as if Rolling Stone has disrespected them but I never heard of backlash from the people of Aurora against media that used Holmes photo.

    • Benthoven

      That orange hair photo was pretty bizarre and made no attempt to “fluff and buff” and glamorize the evil little sh*t, as RS just did.

      • annebeth66

        RS did nothing to this photo. This is the EXACT photo that Tsarnaev had on his social media accounts. People act as if he had a photo shoot for RS, when in fact they did a copy & paste from Twitter.

  • SusieQ63

    My product? Really? Who’s product are you? He’s the product of his family! Not mine.

    • Blowback

      Terror from muslims is the product of your vote for Bush or Obama foreign policies. Own it.

      • Benthoven

        OK idiot – How does that explain centuries of muslim terrorism? Our own US Navy was formed by Thomas Jefferson to combat muslim pirates who were terrorizing, murdering and pillaging peaceful merchants on the Barbary Coast. Islam is the problem, DOLT.

        • Blowback

          Islam is the problem huh? So you think setting fire to the middle east is going to do what, SOLVE the problem?

          • Benthoven

            The ME is setting fire to itself idiot – the blood feud between Sunni and Shia goes back centuries, and will continue, because Islam is and always has been the problem. Yes, Bush was wrong to think we could inculcate such concepts freedom and liberty in the ME, by eliminating a murdering thug who held his scimitar on the throats of an islamic population conditioned to centuries of war. Islam is incompatible with freedom and liberty. Islam is the problem.

          • LouAnnWatson

            flying that palestinan/al qaeda flad again?

      • Andylit

        How old are you? Be honest now.

        Okay, let’s try a little history lesson. What was the Balfour Declaration, how did its implementation impact the Mid East, and why is it considered to be a lynchpin in current world affairs?

        • Blowback

          The lynchpin in current world affairs is US imperialism you cocksucker.

          • Andylit

            You can lead a child to knowledge, but cannot force him to open his mind.

            How sad it must be to live in your head. Perhaps some day you will get help.

          • LouAnnWatson

            the barbary pirates and leathernecks…student of history, are we.

      • tomncoffee

      • LouAnnWatson

        oh, yes. no evil in the minds of the terrorist

        • Blowback

          Evil in their minds, evil in the voters minds.

      • Maverick1327

        Hey didn’t 9/11 happen in 2001 like 9 months after Bush came into office, how have you not brought Clinton into this you ignorant fool! If your going to try to blame presidents foreign policy then realize American foreign policy hasn’t changed that much the last 20 years. PS i love how your comments keep getting removed because you cant talk intelligently, and have to use profanities :)

  • Mac Camp

    It was a Crisis Actor drill.
    This kid was a teenage FBI plant.
    FAKE guy lost 2 legs, w/o medical attention, riding around in a wheel chair???? Conscious???? No blood to speak of????
    FAKE bomb on sidewalk blows store windows OUT onto the side walk?
    IT’s ALL FAKE.

  • tomncoffee

    They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety. –Benjamin Franklin (See http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Benjamin_Franklin) All you good citizens who think the POLICE STATE is making the world a better place need to wake up.

  • Mac Camp

    Let’s get back to the real story, like gun running in Mex, Egypt, Benghazi, Syria, and about 69 other, UN-declared wars.

    • Chumscrubber

      Exactly. IRS sleaze, massive banking institution fraud, draconian and criminally wasteful “war on drugs”, etc.

  • Andylit

    Folks, it looks like we have an angry Pauliac in our midst. He claims to be libertarian but fails on most of the primary requirements.

    Free speech, personal responsibility, etc.

    They’re so cute when they get worked up.

    • tomncoffee

      It’s “they’re” not “their” …

      • Andylit

        Thank you

    • Blowback

      the “primary requirements” as declared by a statist cocksucker like you. Fuck you. I haven’t called for anything but the bomber to go to prison, your party to stop bombing muslims and angering them, and you to shut the fuck up as a SUGGESTION.

      • LouAnnWatson

        you say fuck a lot, are yo angry?

        • Blowback

          This comment has been removed for violating our commenting policy.

          • LouAnnWatson

            i really think you’re angry at yourself and how impotent you feel. if you have any civilized comments, let me know.

          • Blowback

            This comment has been removed for violating our commenting policy.

    • Blowback

      According to your profile Andylit, you’ve left almost 14,000 comments, you’re either on welfare with a lot of free time, or a moron.

      • Andylit

        Child, My taxes alone pay your momma’s welfare. Your Obama-phone is paid for by the taxes on my utilities and your 4th grade edumacation was paid for by my property taxes.

        Obviously all poorly allocated.

        • Blowback

          My momma isn’t on welfare, nobody here has an Obama phone, and nobody I know worth their salt has time to leave 14,000, 14,000! lame ass comments.

          • Andylit

            And yet here you are, mid day, posting to beat the band. How’s the humidity in momma’s basement?

            Let me explain something to you, child. When you run the company and work 7 days a week, you can set your own hours. I work, I take a break, slap around little kids like you, go back to work. Sometime I do both at the same time, like now.

  • tomncoffee

    TWO FACES OF EVIL: THE POLICE STATE & ISLAM: Check out the video http://youtu.be/t_Qpy0mXg8Y

  • Robert177

    When is anyone in the Boston area going to sue for all the hundreds of illegal house searches that LE committed in their insane and over-the-top response? From watching this crazed and aggressive reaction of the police, one would have thought that 10 men each carrying a tactical nuke were on the loose in those neighborhoods. What LE did was incredibly illegal and unconstitutional.

    • Blowback

      The sheep of watertown support this police state action. It’s bizarre. Trained monkeys they are.

    • disqus_4fYpwIITOy

      YOUR way of thinking is what has made this country to screwed. its all ME, ME ME isn’t it?! it wasn’t about those specific people, it was about the community and everyone pulling together to do what was best for the community. the police didn’t hurt, maim or kill any civilian during their search. again – if you don’t live in boston, keep your mouth closed.

      • Blowback

        The police raped the constitution that day, and that any paramilitary “police department” can do these illegal searches in the homeland is an issue for people across the union, not just in Boston. If your “community” is dozens of SWAT teams you can jam your “community” up your fucking ass.

        • disqus_4fYpwIITOy

          There’s some intelligent conversation for you.

      • FinbarOS

        The Constitution establishes individual rights. But then, you’re really not interested in the Constitution, are you?

  • disqus_4fYpwIITOy

    This whole country is screwed up, we are all fighting amongst ourselves and cannot even get along and agree. we are so doomed. F***ed. in huge huge trouble. whatever. i’m packing my tent and going to live in the woods away from all the nut jobs.

    • LouAnnWatson

      don’t take your cellphone

    • runnerbp

      I guess that’s your last comment. Oh well. Good luck.

  • Ralfine

    All you American patriots here:

    What is the difference between you and the Red Guards of China?

    Would you snitch on your neighbor?
    Would you object to a police state or support it with all your heart for the good of your country?
    How much would it take to whip you up to follow all government orders to kill all your enemies?

    • Blowback

      Not much. They are whipped up already.

    • tomncoffee

      Exactly … well said … and they are using fear to drive a wedge of division into society.

      The feds were the ones who ordered the trial of Zimmerman to inflame and drag the issue into the forefront of public conversation, which has done nothing but inflame more division. This will also be used in a problem/solution legislation to take guns away from the citizens.

      They also used it to distract the public away from the real issues, like drone executions, BenGhazi, Fast & Furious, IRS, and the list keeps growing.

      • Blowback

        I already buried half my guns in an undisclosed location in case they do go that far.

    • runnerbp

      Would YOU “snitch” on your neighbor if you saw them collecting pressure cookers and fireworks? What the heck is this idea that we should not be reasonably diligent?

      • Ralfine

        I don’t look into my neighbours purchases in the first place.

  • HarryDong

    wow those pictures of him being apprehended are even cooler than the rolling stone cover.good job sgt.

  • HarryDong

    i forsee Tsarnaev t-shirts being sold alongside Che Guevara t-shirts.

    • Ralfine

      I got me a Snow in the Den T-Shirt.

    • Andylit

      Did Mamma trademark his name yet?

      • Blowback

        racist too? hence the sunglasses?

        • msb204

          Ooh Blowhard used the word racist so now we must all go and repent out of some false sense of shame.

          Pathetic

        • Andylit

          Your momma is calling. Tomato soup and grilled cheese with the crusts cut off, just the way you like it.

          Bye bye little troll.

  • Andylit

    I thought the libertarians stayed in their bunkers until the primary season started. Wasn’t that the agreement? The grown ups can enjoy adult swim for a year or so?

    • Blowback

      You’ve left fourteen THOUSAND comments. Everybody hover your mouse over Andylit’s name. He’s got time to leave 14,000! of these dumbass comments. He is probably proud of that number, to normal people that number would be a badge of shame. His bona fides as a neckbeared basement dwelling troll are actually something he is proud of. His 14,000 straw man comments are a testament to projected desire to really “be heard”. What happened Andy? What happened to you to think you had 14,000 things to say to us? You don’t, Andy. You have nothing to say. If I were you, I’d start a new Disqus name, so that people couldn’t see your 14,000 comment shame. It’s nothing to be proud of.

      • Blowback

        No, hover it over andylit’s photo of his stupid face wearing the sunglasses. That is where you can see proof that this out of control person with a raging need to be heard, has left FOURTEEEN THOUSAND comments.

      • Andylit

        And the libertarians wonder why no one will support their agenda.

        I’m thinking the word of mouth side of the campaign is relying on kids like this one.

        • Blowback

          You just added so so much with comment number 13,501. Thank you. Looking forwarded to 13,000 more zingers.

  • MLep

    I absolutely agree with Sgt. Murphy. It’s a shame that people at Rolling Stone made such a poor decision. I don’t think they would have done that if they personally knew someone who was impacted by the incident. That’s the question they should ask themselves: Would I publish a photo on the cover of Rolling Stone of someone who killed or maimed someone in my own family? I don’t think they would. Would they publish it to a billboard? That’s what they did and now they will have to live with that very poor decision.

    • Blowback

      Hahaha “have to live with”…! they published a fucking magazine cover, they harmed no one. It was actually a brilliant business decision, it’s like the number one google search on google trends, you cannot even buy that kind of publicity.

      Rolling Stone has made its feature article the most read feature article of the month, bringing in readers who don’t even usually read much. It was tactically brilliant. It wasn’t a bad decision.

      Voting for Bush or Obama’s foreign policies of bombing muslims hence creating more terrorists? THAT is a bad decision.

      • msb204

        Why is it that people like you have a problem with using examples that have anything to do with what is being discussed?

        I just wish Bush would have bombed more terrorists.

        You are a fucking moron.

        • Blowback

          This comment has been removed for violating our commenting policy.

          • runnerbp

            So what does American foreign policy have to do with oh wise one? Is there any room in there for complications like fanatical religious killers AND commercial interests AND moving the world to a more progressive society that lets girls go to school AND regional stability AND ….

    • Chumscrubber

      Sgt. Murphy is a typical control-freak, jerk-off cop who feels entitled to re-write the law and US constitution to satisfy his appetites and inane emotional reactions. I missed the part where anyone was brought to trial, evidence was presented, and someone was found guilty by a jury of their peers. This may have occurred in New England, but we don’t have to regress to 1692!

      • MLep

        Do you think it was ok for them to post his picture on the cover of Rolling Stone? That’s what I was referring to: posting the picture. I wasn’t referring to the outcome: if he is guilty or not. To me, it’s more about the victims, not who did it. Their lives will be changed forever, especially those who are not here any longer and those who were maimed. In any case, if someone is arrested, should their picture be on the cover of a magazine? I would think it’s a violation of his rights. If he is found guilty, I don’t think we should post his picture all over the place either. Media has gone way too far with their cameras and marketing has gone way too far to make some money over their cover photos.

        • Chumscrubber

          Again, neither you, nor Sgt. Murphy, get to re-write the law or US Constitution to suit your self-righteous, juvenile, melodramatic reactions!
          If you’d like to decide what photos appear on future covers of Rolling Stone magazine, apply for the editor’s job; if you object to the content of this cover, then don’t buy this issue. Rolling Stone has broken no laws and has done nothing wrong. Conversely, Sgt. Murphy released his photos without departmental approval, so rightly, he’s been suspended and is now the target of an IA investigation.

          • MLep

            Wow, you really like to attack don’t you? I guess it makes you feel powerful. You are taking what I am saying so wrong.Can you answer the question above? Is it something you could do? Or is it beyond you?
            Here is the question: if someone is arrested, should their picture be on the cover of a magazine? He hasn’t been convicted. Why should his picture be there? If I were him, I would totally object. But he can’t. Guilty or innocent. It’s the media I blame. they have no right to post people’s pictures on their cover, unless he allowed them. Did he?

          • Chumscrubber

            Forgive me, but the answers to your questions are so obvious from where I sit, I took them to be rhetorical in nature, and not genuine requests for clarification. If Murphy didn’t need DT’s permission to publish his photos of DT, why would RS? This is why I thought your questions were just the rhetorical component of a specious argument. The short answer, is that DT is famous now, so all bets are off. If a person is classified as a “public figure” (this is a legal classification), they, in general, lose all control over the dissemination of their image, particularly where news publications are concerned.

          • MLep

            Thanks, that’s what I was looking for. You seemed pretty smart, so I was shocked by your initial answer.

          • Chumscrubber

            My pleasure.

  • runnerbp

    It seems people are afraid of copycats and glorification of this murderer. Is the lesson to engage the lost and outcast amongst us because virtually anyone in that position could fall into the same delusional trap as DT?

    • Truth Teller

      Well, what does it say about us as a society that there are tweener girls idolizing this guy

      • Blowback

        People idolize Bush and Obama even though both are massive war criminals. It’s a sick society.

        • Benthoven

          I know VERY FEW people who idolize Bush, but I know ALOT of delusional obamabots who believe he’s the messiah or something and hence can do no wrong – millions and millions of them, and they vote and reproduce. The idiocracy has arrived.

        • Isabella Adamowicz

          Only you are healthy.

      • runnerbp

        Why are men who are dangerous loved by many women? I don’t know. Genetics I suppose.

      • Isabella Adamowicz

        It says that you blew it.

  • tomncoffee

    Free speech is a right granted by The State that honors the natural given right to free speech.

    That means we are free to speak, even when it may be controversial or disagree with whatever it is you believe.

    If you allow the emotional frenzy to govern your respect for free speech, you only encourage the loss of free speech.

    Counter what you disagree with using your own free speech.

  • JP Shipley

    So is Boston Magazine going to donate all of the ad revenue generated from their increased website traffic to the One Fund? Because we all know that magazines can’t be allowed to profit from publishing photos and stories about alleged terrorists.

  • tr99tr

    Even this is NOT the real face of johar. The REAL face of this living-dead is splattered all over the streets of Boston. Go there to look for it. johar, does any of his zapped-of-humanity freak junkies even realize the meaning of that word, johar??? It means ink, black ink, a stain. johar, the black stain that leaves its permanent mark on every one of the faces of those pathetic morons who aim to glamorize him.

    • Blowback

      OK, I’ve had enough. Leaving. The mindless America that gets so angry with a criminal who killed 3 people but gives a pass to a President who melts the faces off babies in Pakistan with drones is just too too much Gotta get back to work. Fuck you Andy.

      • tr99tr

        “melts” babies’ faces!!!! OK now I understand something I didn’t before. So you are glamorizing this living-dead murderer as a spite?!! You’re adoration and love emanates from hate and spite! Who are you? What are you?

      • IngaBinga

        Get back to work slacker.

      • Isabella Adamowicz

        Twisted moron.

  • nemo hove

    What a intellectually disabled man this is, attempting to reason with so little ability

  • Nite Hump

    The Boston Bombing was real, there is no god IDIOTS

  • William Max Young

    Cool laser dot pic, I’m sure it was sited before op

  • Corey Hutton

    Great pictures, i always love seeing how pathetic and scared American Police are. Couldn’t they get anymore officers out there to “Protect and Serve”, i don’t think 1000 was enough for a some punk kids making bombs that every teenager could make around the house. What a waste of money and resources.
    Sadly the bombing didn’t work, just made America more scared and stupid and they already had a surplus on those.

    • runnerbp

      Asinine is my gut reaction to that comment Corey. Those officers are members of the Greater Boston Community and were working hard to catch a very dangerous person who was clearly willing to kill frivolously, had bombs and guns and was running around a familiar neighborhood. Rather than vilify the fine people who did that dangerous work perhaps your logical mind will consider the necessity of catching someone that dangerous and perhaps connected to others willing to do the same? And you say “Sadly the bomb didn’t work”??? I’m just wondering what you’d be saying if your stupid legs were blown off. What a morally corrupt ass.

    • Isabella Adamowicz

      Yes, police are scared, and so they should be, two police officers are killed, and other police should not get scared? . Soldiers are also scared, heroes are also scared. ” Sadly the bombing did not work?’ So two dead policemen, 3 civilians dead many maimed is not enough for you, bloodthirsty monster?

  • Kelsow $ Farlander

    A lot of high minded theorizing going on here. Let me simplify this. Ass hole kills innocent Americans for no fuckin’ reason other than “THIS WILL MAKE ME FAMOUS”. He gets famous, his fellow ass holes defend his actions. This encourages more ass holes to act upon their ass hole-ness. More people die, more ass holes created and on and on and on.

  • Philip Osborne

    These photos have been released by this magazine to increase sales. They are no different to Rolling Stone.

    These photos also do not show a “face of evil” … they show a frightened, battered, bruised young man, innocent until proven guilty by evidence as yet unreleased so none of us have seen it, nor has he had his day in court as we are all entitled to, hunted down like an animal by the full brute force of the world’s most powerful nation. If anything was going to stir feelings of sympathy and empathy with this young man, it is these photos rather than the one on the cover of Rolling Stone!

    • Truth Teller

      The only reason he had to be “hunted down” was he ran and became violent.

    • Blargette

      Phillip. The difference being one magazine glorifies a KILLER and the other shows him for what he is.

      People who kill others, terrorize a city, kill a security guard, carjack, run over their brother and then hide out on the property of innocent people get hunted down and captured like rabid mongrels. He is only presumed innocent in court. The public is free to declare him whatever they think or know he is.

      Treating him like a misunderstood folk hero is the act of a silly dupe.

      • Philip Osborne

        I haven’t commented on what I think of him. I’ve commented on how these photos make him appear and how, therefore, the release of ANY photos proves to be counter-productive. I reserve judgment until the case is heard, there are too many anomalies. For example, the commissioner and police chief both said that he was firing on police in a gunfight from the boat for over an hour before he was captured. And yet when he was captured, he was found to be unarmed! So what really happened? I don’t know, and I don’t care to argue one way or the other. I just say wait until all the evidence has been heard.

        • Chumscrubber

          Exactly. Has everyone forgotten about Waco and Ruby Ridge?

    • Isabella Adamowicz

      So much compassion- he is frightened, innocent, battered, bruised. Please pass me a hankie!

      hunted down like an animal? but he is an animal.

  • Jackie Morgan

    Good for Sgt. Murphy & the Boston Magazine for publishing REAL pics of Tsarnaev: his bloodied, coward self, killing innocent people and then trying to hide. Young people who are mis- or uninformed see his RS photo as hip & sexy; exactly the way RS was trying to portray him.

    • Isabella Adamowicz

      That’s right. Hiding, trying to get away. If he was so proud of what he did, why to hide? Wanted to get away with it, coward. Thanks to that brave policeman and his colleges the mad dog is caught.

  • William Max Young

    My objection Aaron, is the mag chose to empathize with the bomber than with the bombees

  • greg scott

    Hey murphy- “Professional law enforcement” means a hired thug whose main task is to rob and control the masses and give the loot to the parasitical ruling class. It is nothing to brag about and in fact something you should be ashamed of.

    • Dlittlejohn

      Are you really that stupid? Or are you just trash?

      • greg scott

        Trash? Not even sure what that is supposed to mean.
        However, unlike you I see the state for what it is and the thugs who enforce the theft and control it is based on are the cops. They are a scourge on society and eliminate the possibility of anyone having freedom or liberty. Violence is their main tool and they are using it more and more openly.

    • Chumscrubber

      Couldn’t have said it better myself! Absolutely correct greg scott!

  • steveyuhas

    I don’t see anything in any of the released photos that is objectionable. It’s not like the cops were caught in a compromising position like taking a leak on his wounded body or anything that we’ve seen, sadly, in the past. If nothing else, the photos released by the trooper show a side of American humanity that Tsarnaev & his brother failed to see – compassion. People in Mass. should be happy the trooper released these pictures as it proves their humanity.

  • Black Blizzard

    This phucstik ought to have been waterboarded immediately and then set on fire in the public square as an example of what America does to jihadists.

    • Chumscrubber

      The magistrates from the Salem Witch Trials called . . . they want their sadistic, ignorant, hooded freak back so they can get on with tormenting innocent women . . .

      • Isabella Adamowicz

        Witches were innocent.

        • Chumscrubber

          So is Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, until he is proven guilty in a court of law. Google “presumption of innocence”, and you might stumble upon the most important and necessary virtue of a free society.

          • Isabella Adamowicz

            Leave your supercilious, mentoring tone. Tsarnaev isn’t denying what he did. You have free society? Yes, free for terrorists. How is that virtue of not profiling working for you ?

          • Chumscrubber

            Leave your ignorant, reactionary propaganda. Tsarnaev pled not guilty.

          • Isabella Adamowicz

            Demagogue. Evidence against Tsarnaev is not circumstantial, but factual. Court will decide on the punishment. So eat your humble pie.

          • Chumscrubber

            Your comment referencing the “evidence” is utter nonsense. You don’t even know what the evidence against DT consists of, and won’t know until the trial. The court will decide on his guilt or innocence, then we will learn if a punishment is even appropriate. I stand corrected, if a biased, bitter appetite for blind vengeance yields clairvoyance; I wouldn’t know. What I do know, is that whining about his face on the cover of Rolling Stone is a product of arbitrary, self-righteous idiocy, and an inappropriate, colossal waste of time.

          • Isabella Adamowicz

            No nonsence., but of course , let the proceedings begin Not blind vengeance, but. Justice for the 8 year old boy!

          • Chumscrubber

            No sweetheart, justice for ALL. Like I stated, you’re still blinded by the whirlwind of melodrama and retribution you feed on.

          • Isabella Adamowicz

            Sexist , patronizing post. Retribution? Do you lecture about evils of the retribution to those who demand justice for Treyvon? By the way, stop using words you don’t know a meaning of, there is nothing melodramatic with Tsarnaev case, it is a tragedy for the victims and for the city of Boston. To call it melodrama is a travesty.But that is what you and RS are doing. No compassion, no sympathy for the victims – that’s saved for the perpetrator. Obviously such callousness stems from the hatred of your own society and self-hatred.

          • Chumscrubber

            Um, take your meds and a deep breath. I’m stating that your comments are the product of your apparent addiction to irrational melodrama and preoccupation with self-righteous, reactionary vengeance, not unlike Sgt. Murphy’s actions and rhetoric. Reference his suspension and your own posts for support, and google “control issues” while you’re at it; your motives and intentions are as repulsively transparent as his.

          • Isabella Adamowicz

            Your post is nothing more than an ad hominem attack, just a another collection of tired platitudes and slogans. Very predictable. Boring. Your frustration is palpable,. because you have nothing with what to contradict me. Of course you and your kind demand “Justice for Trayvon”, regardless of the verdict. But justice for 8 year old is ” vengeance”! Who is repulsive will tell you your mirror!

          • Chumscrubber

            Like I’ve already commented, please take your meds and a deep breath. What the hell does Trayvon Martin, have to do with this article? Your spelling and grammar skills are as lacking as your ability to stay on topic.

          • Isabella Adamowicz

            When there is no argument the only thing left for losers is to send an opponent to take the meds! Pathetic, as usual. Another favorite defense is to attack his grammar and spelling ! LOL! I’m not a native English speaker. What foreign language do you speak- maybe French, German, Danish, like I do? Ignorant , insular libtard! LOL!

          • Chumscrubber

            I don’t consider you to be an “opponent”, just a deluded, reactionary, vengeful member of the herd. Why don’t you make yourself useful, and explain the dangers of alcohol consumption and smoking to teenagers?

          • Isabella Adamowicz

            Hey, latrineccrubber, you are one of those ignorant, envious, self-hating, pathetic creatures. All your hatred is for the” herd” , and all compassion and sympathy to the terrorist. You and your terrorists go to hell! Justice for the 8 year old boy!

          • Chumscrubber

            Again, meds sweetheart, meds. I you’re going to use designations like “ad hominem”, please avail yourself of what they mean first, so your vile hypocrisy isn’t so stark. Please google “hyperbole”, “reactionary”, and again, “control freak”.
            Again, I support justice for ALL, by rational, correct, and legal (where the law is just), action.
            What part of, ‘melodramatic indignant ravings about a magazine cover, coupled with ill-informed, reckless accusations do nothing to further the cause of justice’, don’t you get?

          • Isabella Adamowicz

            You can refute nothing of what I said. You call your countrymen ” herd”. Speaks volumes about your respect for others, about your professed justice for all! LOL!
            Oh, I get you are a stalker, and an internet pest., that I got long time ago.

          • Chumscrubber

            Advocating justice for all has nothing to do with validating the existence of mob mentality. As to your other accusations, may I recommend that you cease replying to my comments then? Your posts speak volumes about your level of maturity, intelligence, and awareness . . .

          • Isabella Adamowicz

            You’ve already spelled out what justice you have in stall for those you called the ” HERD”. Speaks volumes of your belief in democracy, tolerance and respect for others. Those whom you so kindly called the “HERD”, using all your “maturity”, “intelligence” and “awareness.” LOL! Stop answering me, enough of your platitudes and slogans ! Hater!

          • Chumscrubber

            You have been replying to my original comment. Again, your horrendous grammar, renders your desperate allegations nonsensical.

          • Isabella Adamowicz

            I allege nothing,” HERD” is what you call those who disagree with you. My advice- don’t ask the question, if you can’t handle the answer ,and stop with stupid tired labels such as ” desperate” “nonsensical” ” mob mentality” those buzzwords are just …. buzzwords. Yawn.

          • Chumscrubber

            Obviously you never bothered to google “control freak”, among other vital concepts, such as “hypocrisy”: You state “I allege nothing”, then you make an allegation. Priceless. More nonsense.

          • Isabella Adamowicz

            That’s right. Check the dictionary- allegation is ” a statement asserting something without proof”., but I have a proof This is it:
            you are on a record calling those that disagree with you a “HERD”. Therefore I don” allege” Just state the fact, but you are too much of a coward to admit that your views are antidemocratic, elitist, and intolerant. Again, want to remind you, those who disagrees with you you called a HERD. Obviously your command of your native tang is poor, otherwise you wouldn’t say that I allege anything, ignorant man master your own
            Language !

          • Chumscrubber

            My native “tang” still insists you google “control freak”, and get ahold of some meds, pronto. Yeah, insisting on respecting due process, the presumption of innocence, and justice for all, are patently “antidemocratic, elitist, and intolerant” concepts. Priceless. More nonsense. Please google “logical fallacy”, for your own good.

          • Isabella Adamowicz

            Loser.

          • Isabella Adamowicz

            You comment? You spew primitive vulgarities , again, and again, like parrot. What a loser.

          • Chumscrubber

            “Arguments” proceed from premises to conclusion; all you have to offer are naked, biased conclusions apparently. How about justice for logic and proper grammar? My humble advice, is to learn to crawl before you run. Congratulations on being a polyglot, by the way.

          • Chumscrubber

            Leave your ignorant, reactionary propaganda.
            He pled not guilty.

  • Chumscrubber

    Why isn’t Staff Sergeant Robert Bales, who murdered 16 Afghan civilians in cold blood, the “Real Face of Terror”? Never mind that “The Real Face of Terror” is an absurd, melodramatic indulgence in propaganda; the only person “terrified” in these photos, is Dzhokhar!

    Sgt. Sean Murphy is a typical self-righteours, deluded, entitled cop, who has no respect for the law or due process.

    • Isabella Adamowicz

      Like everyone weak man, you can’t stand heroes, shows your inadequacy .

      • Chumscrubber

        What hero? I can’t stand hypocritical propaganda. Rolling Stone violated no laws whatsoever, and it is Sgt. Murphy’s job and duty to protect the publication’s right to freedom of expression. Sgt. Murphy is required to abide by departmental policy, and his self-righteous, melodramatic antics have rightly gotten him suspended and an IA investigation. Furthermore, his ignorant, reactionary drivel has made law enforcement look even more inadequate and Dzhokhar sympathetic.

        • Isabella Adamowicz

          “…. and Dzhokhar sympathetic”

          Only in your twisted, perverted mind.

          Yes, Murphy is a hero, confronting the terrorist.

          • Chumscrubber

            Delusions abound . . . what is it about “presumption of innocence”, and “freedom of speech” you don’t get? Google “ad hominem” while you’re at it, please; from the frequency of your posts, you know I’m not the only commenter who thinks the photos make DT look sympathetic. Your desperate insults reveal your inadequacies, and your definition of a hero leaves as much to be desired as your debating skills.

  • Jonathan Tardif

    Really funny that some strangers to the victims are mad but the family of the victims do not even say a word. As if they are not bothered at all, as if nothing really happened…

    • IngaBinga

      Ones dead and the other was arrested and will stand trial and then they will get there full justice after he gets convicted. Please go back to sleep…..

      • Jonathan Tardif

        I guess someone else needs to go back to sleep… The family of the “victims” are the parents, brothers and sisters of those four “dead” persons.

        • IngaBinga

          Are you up already? take a sleeping pill.

          • Jonathan Tardif

            You do really care about me. Thank you. That you are up to comment at practically the same time make me wonder why you do not apply your logic to yourself…

  • Daria

    Much more disgusting is that most people simply spits on the right. They were given a “guilty” – they are happy. It does not matter, really, he is guilty or not. Why do not you just think – the prosecution and the prosecutor are just doing their job. They need to blame the man. That is, they are biased. Why did you support their point of view?

    By keeping the charge and calling this young man a murderer – you agree with the defiance of your rights. At other times it can be in his place, and all the hatred will be directed against you.

    Think of Articles 5, 7 and 11 THIS UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS

    International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights – Article 10, 14 and 15

    I’m not asking you to clearly recognize Tsarnaeva innocent, I urge you to remain human.

    • fivestars

      You’re right, we shouldn’t call him a murderer. I mean everyone has homemade bombs that they’re just carrying around in their cars, right? Hmm… Yeah, he’s a murderer.

      • Ummah Gummah

        .

        More precisely stated, he’s a MOSLEM TERRORIST.

        .

    • Isabella Adamowicz

      Brain meltdown.

    • Tweety58

      You assshole-vomit those comments at the parents of the 8 year old boy they viciously blew into pieces.

      Liberalism is a mental illness and you are a carrier.

      And Zimmerman is guilty as sh it right,fool ?

  • L Lewis

    the whole thing was a load and a lie, an out of control situation by the gov’t the Saud prince got away and the two morons got blamed, it was a perfect creation with the result working out as planned

  • Mike Jones

    The guys did the crime. The question Americans need to ask is WHY? Massive numbers of people all over the world hate our country. They hate us for 100 years of failed policy that exploited their countries, raped their natural resources, murdered millions of their people and even today, keeps them poor and uneducated with no hope. No wonder they turn to bogus religion to ease their mental anguish. I dont condone terror, but until we deal with the root cause, we will lose the fight to extinguish it.

    • Jack M.

      Public school graduate. Ignorant, self-hating, America-hating leftist. Move to another country, so you can better understand it.

      • Mike Latoris

        The Founders warned of entangling alliances and recommended not getting involved in foreign wars. They were PATRIOTS and far from being leftist. What you repeat is the same RINO garbage because you don’t embrace true conservatism which always aimed to avoid war.

      • Mike Jones

        Your response is typical of the ilk that have gotten us to this place. I have lived all over the world. As long as there are people like you, there will be terrorists.

    • Ummah Gummah

      .

      What college did u just crawl out of? The jihad started in 620 AD and hasn’t ever stopped.

      The United States of America declared their independence in 1776.

      That mans that the jihad was already underway for 1156 years.

      Google “Hindu Holocaust” to get an idea.

      The USA/The “evil West” hardly has anything to do with that one.

      PS. We gave these Chechens asylum and this is how these moslems paid us back.

      End. of. Story.

      .

      .

    • fivestars

      This is America’s fault? Why don’t you go to the middle east and try to “understand” them? How do you think that would work out for you? Ask Obama. He’s already tried your approach with an apology tour in 2009.

    • Anonamous Guy

      Don’t get carried away.America is THE greatest opportunity for human rights and freedom man has EVER had. I will continue to fight for The Constitution and Bill of Rights. I will NOT throw the baby out with the bath water..

      • Mike Jones

        Freedom and human rights for Americans…we dont give a shit about the rest of the world.

        • Tweety58

          Then leave Sh ithead-go live in Egypt,or Iran,Sausage Jockey.

          • Mike Jones

            I cant leave. I have to stay and protect us from people like you.

          • Tweety58

            Are you going to slap me.or hit me with your purse?

          • Tweety58

            Inside every Liberal is a Totalitarian SCREAMING to get out.

    • caligula

      haha. you sound like a simple college student.

    • Isabella Adamowicz

      LOL! Massive numbers are jealous. Exploited? Saudi Arabia and Gulf states grew fabulously rich , exporting to you. Murdered millions? US saved the world from Nazism, and saved the world from communism, at huge cost . Muslims turn to bogus religion because of US? LOL! Do you know history at all? Do you know that Islam conquered Christian Syria, Lebanon, Egypt,? Do you know that Spain, Portugal and South of France were under Muslims for hundreds of years ? Do you know that Constantinople was a capital of Christian Empire, and now it is Istanbul? Bulgaria, Greece, Hungary, Yugoslavia were under Muslim yoke for hundreds of years. They don’t turn suddenly, Islam is a religion of Jihad. You have no idea about anything, just parrot propaganda.

    • Tweety58

      Shoot yourself Liberal-in reparations for the horrible country you hate.

      You ABSOLUTELY condone terror by offering excuses and rationalizations for it.Tell it to the parents of the DEAD 8 YEAR OLD BOY !!!!

      • Mike Jones

        As soon as you pul your uneducated head out of your ass.

        • Tweety58

          I’ll compare Degrees with you any day,Dullard.

          • Mike Jones

            Obviously your degree isnt in history or world affairs.

          • Tweety58

            I’ve taught both- AND I’m tenured.Suck it up buttercup-I’m the antidote to pinksterism on campus.

        • georgeN

          You need the education ..Work on your spelling

          • Mike Jones

            Yes, thats the important thing here. My typing too fast. Lets focus on that. Thank you for your constructive participation.

    • georgeN

      Mike, get a life, did you attend school for longer than three years ?

      • Mike Jones

        I have a fantastic life, thank you for asking. It has allowed me to travel and live all over the world. My views I expressed are how the Arab world sees us. You cant run from it. Its FACT. You can ignore it, but then the terrorists will never give up.

  • Lars

    Guilty until proven innocent…blah, blah, blah.

    The sniper would have done the world a favor if he had put a bullet where that red dot was.

  • Barn Cat

    The pictures show what martial law looks like. Police dressed as soldiers. They forced their way into homes and locked down the city.

  • Ugly American

    Both faces are the “real face of terrorism”: the handsome boy with messed up hair, and the wounded and barely alive boy with a laser aim on his forehead and… messed up hair. The more information the better, always.

    • SCharlie

      How very true. Every person has a public side and a private side. And there are those with the capacity to have a monstrous side. Google David Westerfield. He was a successful engineer in a nice, tidy middle class neighborhood who is now on death row in Cali for the rape and murder of a 7-year old neighbor.
      Would you know if you lived next door to a serial rapist, murderer, or even, gasp, a terrorist?

  • Nextplease

    The photo’s with the laser beam on his forehead are priceless!! NICE!

    • georgeN

      Agree, the size of the red dot is bigger than his peanut brain

  • 121212121212

    Free Dzhokhar Tsarnaevhe did nothing wrong

    • Truth Teller

      You know this for a fact? Innocent people tend not to car jack people at gun point, shoot at and kill police, have pre made pipe bombs in their car that they throw in to a neighborhood.

      • SurvivorVeteran

        So you actually believe any of that happened?

        • Truth Teller

          More so than I believe nothing happened and he’s just a complete patsy. Of course, the evidence will be presented in court. If even half of what has been reported has any legs, this guy did it or was involved.

        • Isabella Adamowicz

          No, and what you wrote an hour ago doesn’t exist, even if I can read it.

    • Tweety58

      Kill yourself immediately.

  • Mark Golding

    Media Lies and more Media Lies. The summary execution of a suspect without a fair trial in the land of the free is one of those contradictions that increasingly becomes the norm in a police state.
    The way the media has reported on the Boston Bombing, the way footage has been prime cut for special effects, contradicts footage from mobile phones and personal cameras. This ‘terrorist’ event is more about Media Manipulation of images than about accurate news reporting. It has all the hallmarks of 911 skulduggery.
    One cannot trust a media complex that has wholly and complicitly obfuscated the demolition issues surrounding B7 in 911.
    A media system that cannot be trusted will always lead to an over reliance on conspiracy theories and increase public uncertainty about the credibility of the military state that is encroaching on civil liberties month by month, year by year.

    • Tweety58

      You really are a stupid,stupid,man,aren’t you,Princess ?

    • RWFG

      So we should let terrorists kills policemen so they can stand trial?

      Your “progressive thinking” is backwards.

    • Isabella Adamowicz

      If it was execution he would be dead. Get it?

  • John Vincent

    I thought this guy was shot in the Neck???? oh wait they lied. Am I the only one who gets really pissed when i see all the police State – oops i mean State Police covered in military gear?? Why do we you give 2 sh#ts about this story? more people died in Chicago yesterday then the whole bombing. Get over yourself. Its all a distraction…..

  • katarina broman

    Seems to me like you have a lot of Commies in your country nowadays! Might I suggest that they seek asylum in NorthKorea ASAP! They will like it there!

    • Andrew Butterman

      Are you understand what you say?

      • katarina broman

        So sowwy if my grammar is´nt to your liking Mr Buttman. I didn´t expect the Internet Grammarpolice to be watching over me, but then again one has to get used to being watched over these days, LOL

        • Andrew Butterman

          Ohohhow. You are so intelligent… Sorrry,if I hurted you…

  • juan lee

    capitalism at its worse…

  • ruzzty

    I hope ppl tear off the cover if they see one. Stores who buy this rag better be prepared for a loss.

    • ylem

      I might accidentally spill my drink on any magazines I see.

  • tokyo_rose

    He looks like Jesus rising from the tomb with wounds fresh from the Roman scourging. My girlfriends swoon. He is so beautiful!

    • Andrew Butterman

      Yours pearents was at the Marathone Finish? Not?
      You are realy crazy.

    • hus bin pharteen

      someone call this buffoon a doctor. i understand either belleview or bedlam is in your future…

    • runnerbp

      Stunning example of maggots living in brains.

  • Juan

    He looks like ooppss!, I did it again. I hope someone finds him cute in prison.

  • Andrew Butterman

    Dont support terrorism out of America. It will be back

  • Radbushi

    It’s a shame he was not killed in the process of capture.

    • Truth Teller

      Part of me agrees, but ultimately, he needs to be tried, with evidence presented.

  • Ronskij

    As have read the comments I am convinced that my view of american lifestile and moral is even more confirmed after this.
    I haven´t read all the comments but it´s enough for me to experience that some people aren´t convinced of these muslims guilt.

    The paper Rolling Stone flashes in a way the low standard of the american people, where half the population believes in that the Earth has been here for 5000 years.

    The Creationists, The Tea party-movement are other very sick proof of what average americans stands for i the eye of the rest of the world. Except Israel, the baby, of course.

    I feel ashamed.
    Ronny, male from Sweden.

    • Truth Teller

      That people believe the world has only existed for 5000 years is not exclusively American. That is based more along religious lines.

      Other than that, your post is a rambling incoherent mess.

      BTW, don’t you have some riots to go attend to in Sweden? People in glass houses should not throw stones.

    • Ummah Gummah

      .

      What about ur low standard of English? R u even a real Swede or r u an invader?

      .

  • CDODGE2

    For those who sent me threatening messages for calling WILLY SCANLON a Muslim because that’s what he called himself… Please check out the snapshot from his previous discussion before you judge me… Thank you.

  • FreeDubay

    Does Officer Murphy believe in the First Amendment? The very rights he goes out everyday to uphold and protect for every American. He is granted the right for his opinion not to suppress the opinions of others.

    • Truth Teller

      He is granted the right for his opinion not to suppress the opinions of others?

      The words are English but they don’t make sense.

  • jaimzdean

    This is the “face of terror”?? These photo’s reveal NOTHING whatsoever, except that maybe the “officer” who released them is another flake trying to spin the story into his/his organization’s benefit.
    I know lots of people are gullible, but come on!!! I hope people are more discerning than to let these photos motivate them to believe the ‘official story’ about anything.
    “Our government” has repeatedly and blatantly lied since the end of the second world war and now they expect to be believed about anything without question?
    I’m not defending Tsarnaev, but this whole thing stinks and I’m not the only one who thinks so. And our education system is built so that the majority of us is completely unaware of anything important.

    • Isabella Adamowicz

      That’s right, many of don’t history , and even don’t your own classics.

    • Chumscrubber

      You are absolutely correct. Remember Waco? Ruby Ridge? The “Weapons of Mass Destruction”? Please . . .

      • SCharlie

        And I thought Ruby Ridge was lost to history. Abhorrent governmental overreach. Ibragim Todashev is now another statistic of ‘justifiable’ use of deadly force.

  • queteimporta

    as usual, this is just bullshit, another invention from USA government to cover other shit

    • Truth Teller

      as usual, people calling bullshit just call it bullshit and present nothing to debunk other than Alex Jones conspiracy theories.

  • Jennifer Berry

    The Rightful Cover ~

    • Andrew Butterman

      Fuck RS.

    • Isabella Adamowicz

      When will it happen? Once America knew what is right and just.
      I believe it will know that once more.

  • Fip1

    I can see this has brought out the nuts.

  • 1crazymf

    Why is the suspects throat not cut, nor does there appear to be a self inflicted wound as indicated by the police? The official story is being contradicted by the photos released from the story tellers. Look closely at the pictures, the man being treated by EMS on the ground has facial hair on his chin from that angle with a SWAT member applying pressure to a wound to the side of that persons neck, No blood that would run from the wound down your chest, and the suspect exiting the boat appears to be clean shaven.

  • Name23

    They put Charles Manson on the cover once so what makes anyone think they care what the public thinks about what they do?

    • CDODGE2

      The Charles Manson cover was in 1970… Perhaps time and terrorist attacks have changed since then…

  • ME-B

    I am not a conspiracy theorist, but there is a lot about this case that doesn’t make sense. The friend in Florida shot by ONE FBI agent. No witnesses there! The supposed scribbled manifesto inside the boat–where are the photos? Where is the proof? Just because law enforcement said it was there, we all believe it? The kid was so aloof in court, almost cocky–it’s as if he knows he’s part of a play rigged by the US government. It all seems a little strange to me

    • Truth Teller

      Or that he accomplished his goal and is getting tons of press

      • ME-B

        After reading the RS article, I’m not sure that’s the case. He already was a popular kid, didn’t need any more affirmation.

        • Truth Teller

          LOL so the leaked information is bogus but your keen observation that he was popular so therefore he couldn’t be a terrorist because he already had attention is valid?

          He might have been popular in his circle, but it didn’t bring notoriety to his cause. Which is what the attack did.

          • ME-B

            What leaked information? If you mean the scribbles, show us! Why are so many of us just believing law enforcement because they said it?

          • Chumscrubber

            Because they are programmed, hypocrite sheeple, not unlike the bloodthirsty throngs that cheered at public executions in “1984”.

          • Me

            F*ck you. The disdain you show for your fellow countrymen and human beings is disgusting.

          • Chumscrubber

            Brilliant tactic; resort to ignorant expletives, then accuse another of disdain! The absurd, self-righteous hypocrisy and contempt for due process you display is disgusting. Dzhokhar Tsarnaev is one of “your fellow country men and human beings”, whether you like it or not, impetuous imbecile.

          • Me

            If you can’t see the difference in describing a large swath of Americans as “sheeple” and me criticizing you, AN INDIVIDUAL, or Tsarnaev, AN INDIVIDUAL, for what they said or did, or in your case, a general attitude of unwarranted superiority over “the rest of us”…Then I doubt there is anything else I can say that won’t make you lash out even more.

          • Chumscrubber

            Do you know what “lash out” means? Because I do not think it means, what you think it means, Mr. Capslock. Missed the part where I displayed an inability to grasp the difference between the specific and the general, or attributed exclusivity to my level of awareness . . . thanks for the overdose of hyperbole. Please don’t attribute your level of ignorance, and the pathetic blind acceptance of the sheeple within this country to everyone else but me. My comment referred to the phrase “so many of us”, typed by ME-B, not “the rest of us”, typed by YOU, propaganda proliferator that you are. There are plenty of people out there, many of them Americans, who have successfully resisted the brainwashing to which you have obviously succumbed. Unfortunately, independent thinkers are in the minority these days, especially in the US. This is a matter of fact, so don’t blame me for something I’m doing my best to change. I doubt there is anything else you can say to defend your indefensible, poorly articulated position as well . . . try another pugnacious expletive while extolling the virtues of your manufactured civility, and delusions of cognizance maybe . . .

          • ME-B

            and, Truth Teller, I said nothing about his popularity and terrorism. You said that he got attention from all of this. And his popularity isn’t my “keen” observation–perhaps you should read the Rolling Stone article before you get on the nasty train. Oh, and read my post a little more carefully too.

    • Me

      You go from “I’m not a conspiracy theorist” to “it’s as if he knows he’s part of a government plot” in one post. Great leap buddy. You win the gold.

      • ME-B

        If you think that for one minute our government hasn’t been behind some of the worst American-soil tragedies, think again. Waco is a perfect example. Plus, what I’m saying is I don’t think this is a conspiracy at all; I think the government had something to do with it.

    • http://waterboarding.tk/ Claude Balloune

      What’s worse, he was in the process of enrolling in flight-school! And had decided he did not need to do the “Landing a Plane” part.
      And he had recently been to area 51 in the Nevada desert (part of a school “research project” – but why was HE the only student invited?)

  • Capital_7

    I can’t see how this would inspire young people towards violent behavior, seeing as no one under sixty reads Rolling Stone anyway.

  • DeBaliviere

    Where’s your pedo-prophet now, Jo-kar?

  • carlisdm Doria Medina

    I´m not an expert but I know that many psychopaths who have gone into committing terrible crimes or shootings like going in a school or kindergarten to kill people lately look for being known worldwide for their crimes, it´s like they´re in their sick minds looking for their 15 minutes of fame, and the Media contributes to this giving more importance than necessary, well congratulations Rolling Stones you´ve just encourage other antisocials to reach this fake and twisted level of “celebrity”….

  • iloveumore

    It’s completely wrong to put this dumbass on the cover of Rolling Stones! Are you kidding me? And hearing you all try to defend this is disgusting. Who cares about journalism, journalistic views whatever Aaron and you others state in trying to defend the magazine or what it’s about or the point of the story, screw all that shit. The reality is that a dumbass is on the cover of Rolling Stones! What about the real brave victims from this trategy? Why not a story about them?? This guys a piece of shit and to put him on a cover of a world known magazine like he’s an icon is absurd. Shame on you Rolling Stones! SHAME ON YOU!!

  • HomerGreenz

    Funny how no one has ever complained in the past when the images of Bin Laden, The Unabomber, McVeigh, Dahmer, Whitey Bulger, Charles Manson, etc. were displayed on the front cover of magazines or the front pages of newspapers.

    This cop and everyone else that shares his opinion is a crybaby and a phony moralizer.

    Would you folks like some whine to go with that cheese?

    • Chumscrubber

      Exactly. Welcome to the land of arbitrary, melodramatic, imbecile sheeple!

  • andre muir

    The point is to show that he could’ve been in your history class or on your basketball team. There is no color or look to terrorists. That was the point of the Rolling Stone cover. Not every terrorist looks like Osama.

  • 2inthehat

    The laser dot is the best part. hehe love shooters.

  • Jeff Delagado

    Lied to again: “Tsarnaev was in “serious but stable condition” and “not yet able to
    communicate yet,” Massachusetts Gov. Deval Patrick told reporters during
    an impromptu briefing on Saturday.” (CNN 04/20/2013)

    “The surviving suspect in the Boston Marathon bombings suffered an injury
    to his throat and may not be able to talk, a federal official told CNN
    on Saturday, possibly hindering attempts by authorities to question him
    about a motive in the attack.” (CNN 04/20/2013)

    I don’t see a throat injury in these photographs that were just released…. DO YOU?

    • ME-B

      and the “blood” is mighty red! Fake red, if you ask me

    • Truth Teller

      LOL so all evidence released by the media is false……except this one piece (and note, it said he suffered an injury to his throat, not that it was cut). Look at the released pictures, it definitely looks like he got hit with something on the left side of his jaw/neckline, maybe grazed by a bullet, ricochet or shrapnel.

      • ByTheWay

        Whatever happened after the incident caused him to have a heavy accent in the hearing recently where he plead not guilty with swollen face and arm in a cast. He didn’t have a heavy accent before as video has shown.

        • ME-B

          I was wondering about his facial wounds. He’s been in that hospital prison for a few months. How is it his face is still swollen?

          • ByTheWay

            I read he has been tortured to plead guilty. They do not want this to go to trial so all the evidence can be shown of what happened that day and days following.

    • John Q. Public

      Actually, in the second to last photo captioned “Tactical EMTs attend to Tsarnaev” you can see an officer holding a piece of gauze or pressure bandage against the left side of his neck immediately below the ambu bag that is over his mouth. I know that you don’t want to see the evidence that contradicts your preconceived and deeply ingrained conspiracy theory, but come on – its right there in the photo Jeff.

  • http://waterboarding.tk/ Claude Balloune

    Dear BostonMagazine- (and Sgt. Murphy)

    The past few days, my 17 year-old daughter has taken to wearing a burka. Is this just a passing teenage phase?
    As well, she now refuses to eat her mother’s meatloaf at the dinner table, sneering that it is “not Halal”, whatever this may mean.
    I really have no idea where she gets these latest crazes.

    But as punishment, I thought of cancelling her RollingStone subscription, at least until she comes to her senses. I don’t particularly like all those cigarette ads in it anyhow.

    Is it possible that she may take up smoking due to the RS’s influence? Should I be concerned?

    …. … – A doting “tough-love” father.

    • Jo Jo

      You should cancel because it’s a washed up shitrag to begin with.

  • Truth Teller

    All the feds said about his throat was that he had suffered an injury. Looking at the pictures, it looks like he might have definitely taken some shrapnel or grazed by a bullet on the left side of his face (jaw/neck line)

  • Chumscrubber

    Alcohol use deaths PER YEAR in the US: approx. 75,000
    Cigarette use deaths PER YEAR in the US: approx. 400,000
    Number of people who died from terrorist attacks directed at he US in the last FORTY YEARS: under 6,000 – wounded/injured, under 17,000.
    Number of people struck by lightning over the last 40 years in the US alone: approx. 40,000.

    Get off your ignorant, self-indulgent, bloodthirsty, melodramatic, hypocrite soap boxes!

    • IronMountain

      I’m sorry but you are missing the point, Tsarnaev has admitted guilt, was photographed dropping the bomb that maimed many, and killed a young innocent boy. People who smoke, play with a loaded gun, these were innocent people watching a race, and for you to support the glorifying of Tsarnaev makes me wonder about your mental health. A police officer was killed that was sitting in his car so that Tsarnaev and his brother could get more weapons, you are supporting a cold blooded killer, and seriously need to reassess your thought process.

      • ME-B

        admitted guilt how? In a scribbled manifesto inside the boat? Where are the photos of this? Why are people just buying this stuff hook, line and sinker? Where is the proof?

        • IronMountain

          Video’s of him carrying the bomb, and dropping it off, isn’t proof?

          • ME-B

            I have seen no such videos; just photos of lots of people, including him, carrying backpacks. That proves nothing

      • Chumscrubber

        I’m sorry, but you are missing the point. For you to assert that Tsarnaev’s photo appearing on the cover of Rolling Stone constitutes de facto “glorification” makes me wonder about your mental health. Similarly, I wonder about your mental health if you think smoking is the same as playing with a loaded gun. And, you seriously need to reassess your thought process if you actually believe you can reasonably extract any semblance of “supporting a cold blooded killer” from the comment in question. Hey, who cares about the truth, or to what degree you defame someone, when you can just spew irresponsible, self-serving propaganda to make yourself feel better, right?

        Tsarnaev isn’t the first alleged terrorist to appear on the cover of a magazine, not even close. He isn’t the first alleged murderer to enjoy the dubious honor either, not even close. In point of fact, convicted terrorists and murderers have appeared on the covers of numerous magazines. Where is the public indignation over these instances of the so-called “glorification” of murderers?

        While emotional, irrational morons such as yourself are indulging the arbitrary, juvenile, selfish exercise in futility that objecting to the image of Tsarnaev appearing on the cover of Rolling Stone is, much more efficient and effective instruments of death are intentionally being glorified by design, not only within the pages Rolling Stone, but in virtually every form of media that exists!

        The point is, the freedom of the press isn’t going anywhere, Rolling Stone has done nothing unlawful, unethical, or unusual even, and as a country, we have much bigger “fish to fry”! This entire debate is nothing but a red herring, perpetuated by a shamefully self-indulgent cop who’s been suspended for his antics.

  • http://www.carolynemas.com CarolyneMas

    Notice how there is no throat wound in the first photo.

    • Truth Teller

      Notice how there is blood caked on the left side of his face (and you can’t really see the left side of his neck because of the shadow), looks like he might have gotten grazed by a bullet or taken some shrapnel on that left neck/jaw area.

    • runnerbp

      Notice all the maimed bodies, the photos of the men with their backpacks, photos of them leaving backpacks, a cab driver that dropped them off with their backpacks? No, one wouldn’t notice that while wearing paranoid delusional glasses.

  • Christopoher

    For the love of Christ, it has been obvious from the start that this kid didn’t do ANYTHING and he’s being completely railroaded by the Federal government who murdered his brother, their friend, and probably 2 of their own agents. THERE IS NO BLOOD ON TSARNAEV’S neck, nor anything to indicate that he was injured in this manner – and if he was – he wouldn’t have been able to move around like this. Don’t you shills have ANY shame, at long last. Please shoot yourselves in the throat and take a picture – we’d love to see how that works out in practice

    • ME-B

      I don’t think he’s being railroaded; I think he’s a pawn. Once he’s found not-guilty of just one of those charges, I suspect they’ll ship him back to his father with a directive to never come here again. It’s just all too convenient otherwise.

      • runnerbp

        So the pawn admitted he did it? The pawn was dropped off by a cab driver with the backpacks? The pawn was photographed placing the backpack at the explosion point? The pawn wrote on the inside of the boat explaining why? The pawn revealed what they were up to with the guy who they carjacked? The pawn ran over his brother after throwing bombs out of a car and shooting at officers? What is it that drives people to believe utter nonsense. It can only be believed because it’s unbelievable. Here’s something to ponder TT and ME-B….. you both have listening devices that were planted in your colon walls while you were secretly drugged by black ops troops. I know this is true. How? Because the media did not report it.

        • ME-B

          as I’ve said all day, “Where is the proof?” Someone in authority said he wrote things inside the boat and you just believe it? And I am in no way being judge and jury here. I’m merely stating that some of these “facts” just don’t add up.

          • runnerbp

            What about the video of him planting the backpack that blew people to smithereens after a cab driver said he drove the same guys to the area …. what about that bothers you? Why do you focus on evidence you may not have viewed while completely dismissing dozens of eyewitness accounts and video and bomb making equipment in their homes. Weird.

          • ME-B

            because I don’t trust the government. I at first thought it was plausible that this kid had something to do with the bombings, that he and his brother acted alone. But my mind started changing after the unarmed friend was killed by an FBI agent, with no one else there. That’s just a little too strange for me. I’m merely being cynical. Yes, there’s evidence that has been shown; my point is that people are believing evidence that HASN’T been shown. That’s my only point

    • Truth Teller

      How is it completely obvious that he didn’t do anything?

      • ME-B

        Truth Teller,

        You don’t read very well. Where does it say “completely” obvious in that post?

        • Truth Teller

          Ok, how is it obvious?

          • ME-B

            Ask the person who wrote the post, not me

    • http://waterboarding.tk/ Claude Balloune

      Yes, and apparently they even plan to blame him for Kennedy’s assassination too! (Bobby’s, not John’s).
      As well as indict him as the 21st 9-11 bomber.
      And just think about it- Pressure cookers! Do “they” really think we are ALL that stupid?

      The Mossad and their stooges, the FBI, certainly have their wiles!
      Christopher, I am glad that there are alert readers like you out there! Democracy and freedom may still have a chance!

  • Christopoher

    I’m gonna take a wild guess and say it’s unusual for a person who just shot himself in the mouth to stand up and calmly show his hands. And to not be bleeding from the mouth. And to not have a gun. And kind of coincidental to have not had another bullet for second try.

    If I was a teenager and got shot in the mouth, I dunno, guess I would be, like, in extreme visible pain or something. Maybe he just doesn’t have a nervous system and is invulnerable to massive trauma.

    Also, that’s a photo of a neck being dressed with what kind of looks like just a bruise… PROOFE!

    • juststacey

      What’s PROOFE? I’ve never seen that word. Is it French? It looks French.

      I think you were going for “proof”, but the typo wouldn’t be a surprise from someone who apparently misspelled his own name, unless your name really is Christopoher.

      But anyway, “what kind of looks like just a bruise” probably wouldn’t be considered proof by anyone’s definition. Just saying.

  • Misspenny1

    The remaining suspect should’ve plead guilty and just ended it all. A waste of time. he knows what he did, he admitted it already. Send him to prison or execute him.

    • ME-B

      um, not guilty was his only legal option.

      • Misspenny1

        He knows what he did, he admitted it. He could have plead guilty. Is he a rock star now? The media, at least Rolling Stone Mag. is making him out to be.

  • Christopoher

    The whole point of this breaking story is the fact that the picture(s) the Boston police officer leaked ”SHOWS” NO wound on his neck as he exited the boat.Aren’t you paying attention?The wound occurred AFTER he exited of the boat!The wound occurred while he was in custody.Try to keep up,the questions get harder from here.^.^

  • Christopoher

    Do not question the official narrative. Do not point out logical facts. When you go to Vegas and watch a magician saw a woman in half and she is put back together, it is real magic and anyone that points out the smoke and mirrors is an unpatriotic domestic terrorist. YouTube caused Benghazi. It is for our own good. Stay in the herd. Do not question anything.

  • Christopoher

    Most people have a very strong psychological ‘need’ to feel in control of their lives. If they accept that our government is absolutely corrupt and out of control, then they also have to accept that they are facing an extremely powerful threat. It makes them feel frightened and out of control of their lives. They can’t cope with it, so they mentally shut down. It’s not they are stupid. They’re just cowardly and weak. I guess that is what happens, though, after generations of a nanny state government all but removing natural selection. Weak genes prevail. FFS there is a tag on my hair dryer warning me not to use it underwater.

  • kmt0719

    I may be crazy, too liberal, too much of a mom,etc., but the photos above cause me to feel more sympathy towards this child than the Rolling Stone cover photo.

    • ME-B

      agreed. the one of him leaning on the boat is especially difficult to look at

    • SCharlie

      I am obviously among those deemed crazy because I cannot help but feel sympathy towards this young man. As a mother and grandmother my first instinct when I viewed these photos was profound sadness and horror, much the same way I felt when I viewed the uncensored photos of the bombings. While I may be alone in this line of thought, I felt sincere relief when he came out of that boat alive.

  • Christopoher

    The Tsarnaevs were patsies for a failed false flag operation by DHS. One of the reasons for Big Cyst’s abrupt departure. Along with covering their trails by eliminating Aaron Swartz and Michael Hastings. The laundry is ALL going to be hung out. If you have the urge to blow a whistle you better do it now.

  • ashley110

    radical extremists are proud of their actions and more than happy to die for their cause. In fact, they WANT to be killed because in their head, they will be martyrs that go to heaven. they don’t hide in a boat and wait for police to catch them!i never heard of a terrorist hiding and running for his life after committing g an act of terrorism. after the attack they went back to their normal lives, they could leave this country or flee out of the country but they didn’t! they faces were on the biggest news networks what were they suppose to do, not run! there are 9,000 officers are following you, whole country hates you, THEY GAVE them no choice, they were FORCED to flee, they were already labeled as terrorists MONSTERS..our enemies. if the police didn’t kill them , somebody form the general public more than likely would have. THEY NEVER HAD A CHOICE! will you people stop listening to news and look at real facts! if they did this i wanna SEE THE Proof , if they can release pics of the shootout, why can;t they release the footage of them placing the bags? what taking them so long? it’s been more than 3 months! some people are already considering him as the terrorist and he’s NOT even proven guilty yet! i believe in “INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY” he has a sniper laser beam pointed at the dead-center of his forehead but he has his hands up to surrender and is clearly showing no threat, and just the fact that the police brutality went this far is insane. all i see two guys wearing bags, walking around. they were not the only ones with the backpacks they were thousands of people with backpacks. both exploded bags were black but jahar has white backpack and tamerlan had grey backpack. it was reported by authorities that there were 5 bombs there that day(you don’t know this because you don’t pay attention to real facts).hat one of the exploded backpacks exactly matched that of one of the Navy Seals/Craft International security personnel working the Marathon that day.jahar and tamerlans DNA DID NOT MATCH ON THE pressure cookers but it match with FEMALE DNA. you will still winder how he got that neck wound when police were the only one shooting at him. that day Boston Globe tweeted about “bomb drills” and “bomb squad activities” the day of the marathon, with one of the tweets being sent in close proximity to the time when the actual bombs were detonated.that day hat the authorities deleted photographs and videos from the phones and cameras of spectators at the marathon. here’s a witness talking about deleted pics: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NF2-7WT0_8w . there was NO blood on the outside of the boat until AFTER Dzhokhar surrendered. there was no blood in that boat but on the stair case of the boat which means he was shot after he got out. its SAD people are NOT even looking at the real facts, there are many inconsistencies in this case.

    • kenuch

      This is a homegrown, wannabe, radical terrorism, not well steeped in the true nature of the art and its attendant pains and gains. Little wonder he buckled when faced with the reality of the game. Doesn’t make him any less a terrorist.

      • Chumscrubber

        You know what else is “homegrown”? Presumption of innocence.

  • Christopoher

    “I hope that the people who see these images will know that this was real. It was as real as it gets. This may have played out as a television show, but this was not a television show.”

    Now why would he even have to tell US that? “This is as real as it gets”!!!? Really? So our new “reality” is thousands of “troops”…shutting down one of the largest cities in the country… to “hunt down”….one guy!!!!? One, “unarmed” guy!!!? That’s supposed to be our reality? People…you need to get a grip on reality….this was a drill to see just how far our govt could take this…and they got their answer…..it
    was answered with applause.

    • ME-B

      there is something to be said about how citizens in Boston just accepted martial law for several days and law enforcement entering their homes for one 19-year-old kid. That’s pretty scary

      • Truth Teller

        That they wanted the person responsible caught?

        • ME-B

          the person they “think” is responsible

    • runnerbp

      So how would you hunt down a guy who is hiding in a neighborhood he knows well? Someone who may throw a bomb or has a gun and clearly enjoys using it/them. Why don’t you see the operation as an example of how hard it is to catch a determined, armed and dangerous person who knows their territory? You suggest getting a grip on reality when you are swimming in mindless imaginary BS while refuting every piece of real information as invalid. The only thing you believe in is the unproven and unbelievable. Yes I know you can’t help it. But at least you can be made aware of it. But, of course, it’s too real for you to ever believe.

      • Christopoher

        Nice try cop

  • MAC59

    After enlarging and lightening the first photo, he has both hands in the air with no weapon. There is no gunshot wound to the throat. I’m curious as to what transpired after that photo was taken to justify the throat shot as he was reportedly unarmed when taken into custody.

    • ashley110

      he was UNARMED, the police were the only ones shooting at him, he got that neck wound after got out. do you remember how the police said that he tried to commit suicide but they later confirmed he was UNARMED.

      • MAC59

        Yeah, that’s why I asked. I guess there is quite a bit of conflicting information. I can’t help but be cynical based on the national epidemic of bad-cop behavior.

        • Truth Teller

          and that’s why so many people are crying conspiracy, in a perfect world, authorities would release zero information on an ongoing investigation. The problem is the media knows people in law enforcement that they get bits and pieces from (and who knows how in the loop the source is), so you get these contradicting or incomplete reports from journalists trying to pump up ratings. Ultimately, we will see everything at trial.

    • Truth Teller

      The report wasn’t a shot to the throat, it was that he had sustained a neck injury. If you look at the pics, the entire left part of his face is caked in blood. You can’t see the left neck/jaw area clearly because of the shadow but definitely looks like he might have caught something.

  • Sakeeta Rosen

    Haha, right. I love how the sheep believe all these lies.

    He has no throat wound in those pictures. Yet they say he couldn’t talk because of the wound? Horrible horrible job faking the whole thing.

    They did 9/11 way better than the Boston bombing, thats for sure.
    Their cover ups were horrible with the Boston bombing. A guy who has his fake legs blown off, a child that supposedly died, yet his picture was used before because he was a “victim” in something.

    Government really cant do anything right, can they? Even when they plan it all out, they still screw it all up. So many scenes from the bombing show the truth: that it was all fake.

    • ashley110

      they said he tries to commit suicide, but later they confirmed he was UNARMED, he got that neck injury after he got out!

  • Christopoher

    This Marathon Bombing marks a watershed. Either it will be busting up the crminal gangs OR people can expect more deadly False Flags. Brave people are not intimidated when they are on the side of truth and justice. Everything is exposed. What will you as a citizen do about this? You have enough evidence for a mountain of criminal indictments.

  • ashley110

    well…

  • Christopoher

    The actors used in the [drill] we call Boston Bombing false flag is another issue to be scrutinized.Were some people hurt and or killed? Yes,but so were 1000’s in 911,the illegal war action afterwards and the subsequent deaths from poison fill dust in NY.Point is,why haven’t the corporate media been all over the mangled survivors of Boston bombing?Why haven’t they paraded them in front of us?Because they were actors unmasked and can’t further the agenda,this joke,this lie,this play on the American people.

    Like Sandy Hook etc…A gov’t psyops in action and they have been caught.Our fight with the globalists take over of America is ongoing and far from over but we are revealing the tyranny more and more and people are becoming aware of these steps that are intended to oppress us.Stay the course…the battle has just begun.

    • runnerbp

      Is there anything real you believe Christopher?

      • Christopoher

        Sheeple use your google and apple devices. Get on facebook and update your status. Pay your taxes and listen to what the heck we tell you to. And let us manage your finances. Carl Levin, Diane Feinstein are just a few of the 11percent of Zionist controlled white house. Corporate america goes public when we Goldman Sachs or JP Morgan allow you to divulge your business to us. Than we sell your product thru Rupert Murdoch or Leslie Moonvies Fox and CBS to the sheeple we have created worldwide. Than we create wars in the middle east and let you waste your blood and money so we can prosper. Zionism is Beautiful. Thank you America. By the way thank you Barack for Choosing Samanth Powers to be Americas new Spokes person the World she is one of us :)

        • runnerbp

          Well at least you’re a literate lunatic.

        • John Q. Public

          Its the Jews. Its always the Jews. It was the Jews in Hitler’s Europe and its the Jews in Christopher’s warped, twisted little fantasy land. Blame it all on the Jews. Why? Because most people have a very strong psychological ‘need’ to feel in control of their lives. If they accept that their own sorry lot in life is their own fault, it makes them feel week and worthless and they can’t cope with it, so they mentally shut down. It’s not they are stupid. They’re just cowardly and weak. But, if they can blame the Jews, then its someone else’s fault. It’s not that Christopher is a loser who never amounted to much because of his own inadequacies, its the Jews fault that he’s a loser. It’s the Jews fault that he never amounted to much. That allows people like Christopher to cope with his own pathetic little worthless no-good life beacuse, hey, its not his fault – its the fault of those evil Jews who are holding him down.

  • Reg

    Responding to a magazine cover with Fascist Propaganda…..Sure. You’re intentions are noble, and honorable. Tsarnaev may be a terrorist, but so are the police.

    • ashley110

      how not even convicted yet, he’s NOT proven guilty yet, they’re already calling him the terrorist! he was UNARMED during the shootout,police were the only ones shooting at him!

      • runnerbp

        How did the police know? He had bombs and guns and fled the scene where he and his brother killed a policeman rather than lie down spread eagle and give up. No, he’s not convicted. If you killed somebody in front of a video camera you would not be convicted or guilty of murder by law. But you would be guilty in fact. And we all would know it.

        • Chumscrubber

          Except that he didn’t “kill somebody in front of a video camera”.

          • racheyrach

            no,he put a bomb next to a little boy, that’s what he did. at first i thought these people were kidding with their conspiracy, defending this murderer, but you’re not. how about some respect for innocent lives and the familes they left behind? or do you only care about the feelings of the terrorists?

          • Chumscrubber

            How about some respect for the law and the cornerstones of our failing democracy? Given your reactionary gibberish, I’ll not waste my time asking you to respect the facts over emotionally-charged propaganda. Please google “presumption of innocence” and “due process”, also “melodrama” while you’re at it. I care about the rights afforded every US citizen, including Dzhokhar Tsarnaev. I’m defending the truth, and the law; nothing more, nothing less. Or do you only care about your own bloodthirsty appetite for revenge?

      • Neil

        I just linked this to Christopher in hopes he’d screw his head on straight, you should read it as well Ashley

        http://www.infowars.com/boston-bombing-culprits-found/

        • ashley110

          WELL TRUTH HURT ISN;T! i don’t believe those kind of WEBSITES, you know what, i did my own research! there are many unanswered questions and stories don’t make sense! i used to think the same think but then i STARTED TO realize there were many inconsistencies. why don’t you look at real facts rather questioning people’s opinions!

          • Neil

            I think Alex Jones and his crew at infowars are complete idiots. I figured though given your support for the notion that this was a false flag you should hear it from -your peoples- god himself.

            http://www.snopes.com/politics/conspiracy/boston.asp#principal

            Can’t argue with Snopes.

            You haven’t investigated deeply enough, don’t turn into a Christopher. There are definitely injustices around the world that need the attention of the masses and Mass media doesn’t do a very good job doing it, but shooting off rhetoric about the boston bombing that has been completely retorted is a terrible way to go about life.

            Turns out, Dzhokar and his brother were just jerks.

    • Chumscrubber

      Hell yeah Reg, hell yeah.

  • canardnoir

    Yep.

    The red dot that you can’t wipe off.

    That was the image that had real cover-shot quality. The story line was and will always be about an egregious criminal act, not rock-stardom.

    But that’s not RS’s style, nor their general take on such a subject – so subsequently, would-be readers should simply vote with their buying power to make their true feelings known.

    Though sometimes offensive, constitutional rights continue to have their place within our society and a free press underpinned by free speech is among those fundamental freedoms.

  • Christopoher

    This boy is playing a role he is not anything, but a pawn being used to cover the NWO Hoaxer’s butt’s they wanted to pin this on Patriot Groups so bad they would have Snuffed their own mother’s to do it. Imagine for a second this had been successful what better way to have demonized the second amendment than to have had a Crazed Truther, or phony Militia group at an event dedicated to the Shady Hoax incident. This is what they wanted, but because of their terrible execution of the event, and so called Conspiracy theorist “which are growing in numbers these day’s” poking there noses in the media’s misinformation. They were forced to use their back up plan which doubles as a distraction from all them nasty little scandals that got exposed.
    Every False Flag put’s our freedom in Jeopardy nothing in this country Major happens on accident come on now. They monitor your conversations, watch your every move, they know were you work, who your doing, if you touch yourself, they are like a demonic Santa Claus how can anyone plot anything without prior knowledge? KEEP YOUR EYE’S PEELED, AND STAY SHARP THE HOAXER’S ARE FAR FROM DONE.

    • Neil

      Hey Christopher, I’m going to share with you a link from a website I can’t stand. The reason I am linking you to that site is because I think Alex Jones and associates are right up your alley so perhaps you’ll take the time to check it out.

      http://www.infowars.com/boston-bombing-culprits-found/

      ALL of the Boston Bombing False Flag conspiracy theories have been completely debunked AND all “suspects” identified.

      For you to even continue posting here like you have ANY clue, is pointless.

      I don’t mean to offend you but you clearly haven’t spent the time to fully form a proper opinion on the matter.

  • Christopoher

    Anybody that believes the govt’s story is brainwashed and unable to critically think for themselves. Supposedly the brothers tossed pressure cooker bombs out of their vehicle’s window at their assailants…? What did they do? Wait for the timer to get down to three seconds and toss them out? Ha-ha this is pathetic. Not to mention the throat wound ordeal.

    • Neil

      http://www.infowars.com/boston-bombing-culprits-found/

      Not even the whackjobs at infowars are still arguing false flags in Boston. You need a reality check buddy.

      • Christopoher

        Really Nut Job? See you in FEMA death camp asshole!!

        • Neil

          Yes please, resort to that. Your post holds absolutely zero substance. What does FEMA have to do with any of this.

          With that link I shared with you, please point out one false flag that hasn’t been spoken to.

          OH GOD PLEASE, tell me about the stupid playing card game. The one with the jogger.

          • Christopoher

            How about your fight your own demons and leave me out of it !!!!

          • Neil

            Fight what demons? Seriously, are you one of those guys that walk around the inner city condemning people to hell for living their lives they way they are going about simultaneously carrying a tin can asking for change? This is scary, I’d read a book about someone like you… do you really have a place in society? Or Perhaps you are one of those guys that can’t fit in so he comes up with some sort of disability (psychologically of course) to keep them tucked away in a dark room exploring the deep dark internet.

            Honestly, when you talk to other people and you have so many people saying you a rampant nuts; it’s not them… it’s. you.

  • Willy Scanlon

    Sgt. Sean Murphy of the Massachusetts State Police was suspended today by the Massachusetts State Police because he did not have permission to release those pictures or authorization to place his comments as a state trooper in the news media. That is a positive outcome

  • Rex

    ALL THAT, and the Cops didn’t even find him. A homeowner did.

    • ashley110

      don’t forget he was UNARMED in that shootout! they lied about his injuries

  • Christopoher

    THE ZIONIST MAKES THE LIES, THE TROLLS KEEP UP THE ILLUSION AND THE BRAIN WASHED CATTLE COME FOR AID FROM THE SAME BEAST THAT ENSLAVES THEM.

    • Neil

      Pass the bong this way.

      • Neil

        What does ANY of this have to do with Israel anyways?

  • Cindy Kilgore Yahna

    Those photos look fake, just like the Boston Bombing and Sandy Hook, putting amputees with fake blood and makeup artists at the scene. This is all about control and to take away our guns. Please everyone wakeup and do your research. This is all a hoax, probably paid this John Wolfson to show these fake pictures, even the blood looks fake! They downplay everything by saying it is our conspiracy theory, not a theory it is the truth. I so hope Americans will check all this out for themselves and not believe the news media. They will lie to us!!!

    • Neil

      http://www.glamour.com/inspired/2013/02/our-mother-was-the-sandy-hook-principal-glamour-march-2013

      Dawn Hochsprung – Deceased. RIP

      That said,

      http://www.snopes.com/politics/conspiracy/boston.asp#principal

      You are an absolutely vile and ignorant woman for repeating the nonsense that you are trying to feed to people. It’s sickeningly ironic that you are telling others to wake up and do their research. Please never post anything on the internet again.

      • Cindy Kilgore Yahna

        This is a free country and it shows that you are afraid of the truth. Don’t tell me what I can or cannot do! Thank you for showing your ignorance and you are fear based!!!!

        • Neil

          Sorry, logic please?

          Explain to me your stance on the Boston Bombing conspiracy. Tell me something that hasn’t already been factually proven otherwise. There is no information to support a false flag in Boston.

        • John Q. Public

          Actually, Neil never told you what you can or cannot do. He asked you. Nicely. He even said please. Actually, Neil was much more pleasant to you than you deserved. It is a free country and Neil is completely free to tell you that you are a vile and ignorant woman. And I am free to repeat it.

          • Cindy Kilgore Yahna

            According to the rules here, you are not allowed to personally attack a person on this board and if you further continue, I will report you. Dont be ugly!

    • racheyrach

      you think sandy hook was fake? do you also think 911 was fake?

    • Barbara Friel

      Thank you for your ignorance. As a family member of an innocent wounded individual I find your post disturbing beyond words. If you truly believe the entire thing is faked because that makes you feel safe and able to sleep at night, I feel for you. I wish it had been faked, truly I do. But we can’t hide our heads in the sand and put our fingers in our ears any longer. Bad things happen, and this did happen. I know this shatters your safety, I get that, but please don’t further insult those of us still trying to recover with your comments based in fear.

      • Cindy Kilgore Yahna

        Most people have a very strong psychological ‘need’ to feel in control of their lives. If they accept that our government is absolutely corrupt and out of control, then they also have to accept that they are facing an extremely powerful threat. It makes them feel frightened and out of control of their lives. They can’t cope with it, so they mentally shut down. It’s not they are stupid. They’re just cowardly and weak. I guess that is what happens, though, after generations of a nanny state government all but removing natural selection. Weak genes prevail.

      • Neil

        Barbara, I concur it appears as though Cindy is completely disconnected and not empathetic towards the feelings of others at all. Thanks for bringing everything back full circle and shining some light from the side of the victims, yourself included.

  • Christopoher

    It’s another example of why you should never trust the government.

    Back in April federal officialdom told us Boston bombing suspect Dzhokar Tsarnaev was shot in the throat and unable to talk. Massachusetts Gov. Deval Patrick was trotted out to confirm this fantasy story. He said Tsarnaev was in “serious but stable condition” and “not yet able to communicate yet.”

    Then we were fed a more theatric version where the young Tsarnaev attempted to take his own life when he was supposedly trapped in a boat. “It is thought the teenager placed a gun in his mouth and pulled the trigger in a desperate bid to avoid capture and a possible death penalty,” claimed the British version of the National Enquirer, The Mirror. “Reports say the bullet passed through his throat, just missing his spinal cord, and came out the back of his neck.”

    • http://waterboarding.tk/ Claude Balloune

      Yes, but none of this answers the question of why my 17 year-old daughter (below) is now wearing a burka, and will not eat her mother’s meatloaf!

  • Christopoher

    This Hollywoodesque version dovetailed nicely with the story that the evil Brothers Tsarnaev were in a running gun battle with the cops, flinging home-made pressure cooker bombs at their brave pursuers as the pair attempted to escape the long arm of the law.

    Then we were told Dzhokar was being treated by Israeli doctors who “have abundant past experience treating victims of terror… because they’re from Israel.”

    “Tsarnaev is in stable condition but that because of wounds to his throat, he may never be able to speak again,” The Blaze reported, feeding the fantasy

  • Christopoher

    In May, the story changed. It was said Tsarnaev didn’t have a bullet wound in his throat, but was cut. “I did see a throat injury. To me it looked more like a knife wound,” said Officer Jeff Campbell of the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority Transit Police SWAT Unit. “It wasn’t a puncture hole. It was a slice where it was spread open, possibly a piece of shrapnel from one of the explosives that they were using the night before. It didn’t look like a bullet wound to me. It looked like a cut of some kind.” Campbell was supposedly part of the team that apprehended Tsarnaev, so if anybody knew about his wounds, it would be Campbell and his fellow SWAT officers.

    CNN later edited out the comment about the throat wound made by Campbell.

    • Cindy Kilgore Yahna

      Excellent point!!!

  • Neil

    Christopher is literally quoting, verbatim, another article he just read on infowars.

    http://www.infowars.com/dzhokar-tsarnaevs-throat-wound-another-government-lie-bites-the-dust/

    Posts below this one.

    Not only are you a whack job, but you also clearly aren’t intelligent enough to form your own opinions on the matter. On that note, I’ll bid you a farewell and good riddance.

    Nice plagiarization .

    • Christopoher

      who are you troll? A mad little man that’s afraid of truth ? Your nothing but a troll eat a shit pie!

      • Neil

        I love it when people are wrong on the internet so they resort to calling the person that is arguing with them a troll. Instead of acting like a 12 year old, why don’t you post something that’s remotely legible and sensible and discuss it like an adult.

        All the nonsense you are talking about is completely unproven, whereas you are trying to “poke holes” in things that are accepted as fact (by using more unproven nonsense), yeah clearly I’m the troll.

        Read a book, you can’t cure stupid.

  • ashley110

    they said he tries to commit suicide but late they confirmed he was UNARMED! you ca’t see any neck injury in those pics because he got that after he got out! there’s no jaw injury in those pics, he got that one too after the arrest!.

    • Cindy Kilgore Yahna

      Good comment, it is so refreshing that others are truth-seekers!!! The picture doesn’t even look like Tsarnaev, was probably a stand in actor needing some rent money…

      • Neil

        I love how these internet forums work, I post something directly to Cindy, she doesn’t like how it completely discredits everything she is representing and instead of responding with some logic and reason, she moves onto the next one in her favour and carries on like it never happened.

      • ashley110

        i don;t think those pics are fake

      • Neil

        Seriously almost fell out of my seat laughing.. lol

        • Cindy Kilgore Yahna

          Seriously, I fell out of my seat laughing at your comments it is obvious you need anger management and a high school diploma. Lol!

          • TECH-STERMINATE

            Grow some balls and stop subjecting me to -your- face. Also, I see you graduated from a tech school.

            I’m a software engineer. :)

      • Cindy Kilgore Yahna

        I feel sorry for you. Grow some balls and put your face on here…coward!

    • racheyrach

      who cares what injuries he had or what happened to him after what he did. that’s absurd. i don’t care what they do with him now or how they treat him, he’s a radical muslim terrorist monster.

      • Chumscrubber

        Presumption of innocence, due process, etc, etc.

      • ashley110

        terrorist monster? he’s still a SUSPECT, he’s not convicted yet, he;s NOT proven guilty yet! well that show racism, you are saying that because he’s Muslim, it’s shame in 2013 there’s still racism going on! look at the real facts, then talk to me! where’s is your humanity?

        • DrForrester

          There was a handwritten confession inside the boat. He’s all but convicted. Don’t sit there and say he’s innocent until then, you look like an idiot. Though judging by your other posts I’m gathering that may be the case

          • Chumscrubber

            Hey genius, what part of “innocent until proven guilty” don’t you understand? Neither you, nor anyone else, gets to declare him guilty out of lazy self-righteousness and ignorant spite!

          • MaggieJ

            But you get to blame the gov out of lazy self-righteousness and ignorant spite. I see.
            I hope you are starting to realize why no one can possibly take what you say seriously.

          • Chumscrubber

            Exactly where do you find me “blaming the gov”? Questioning is not the same as blaming. Cynicism is prudence, not spite, sweetheart. And yes, under the law, I have every right to question the government, but under the law, you have no right to declare a man guilty, or advocate any punishment whatsoever, until he has been adjudicated guilty in a court of law. I’m defending the principles of justice essential to the integrity of our entire system. Didn’t realize you were capable of, or chosen to, speak for everyone, my hyperbole-spewing friend! I hope you are starting to realize that you are nothing more than a propaganda parrot, not to be taken seriously.

          • MaggieJ

            Ever so sorry – I didn’t read your name properly and thought that was from Christopher. Sorry!

          • Guest

            I apologize as well. I hope you understand why I characterized your inaccurate comments (I now know why they were so off-base) about me as willful defamation and responded in kind. No hard feelings : ).

          • MaggieJ

            I haven’t made any inaccurate or off-base comments about you. I was making fun of you on purpose.

          • DrForrester

            I’m not self-righteous. The guy wrote a confession extolling the fanaticism that corrupted he and his brother. Innocent until proven guilty are just a few empty words in the face of evidence like that

          • Chumscrubber

            Actually it does; it’s called the law. And yes, you most certainly are being self-righteous if you think you are entitled to discard due process because you feel the irrational need to proclaim without precedent or justification that it “doesn’t mean shit.” Actually, your irrational opinion “doesn’t mean shit”; the law doesn’t change to suit your self-indulgent, self-righteous indignation. His reported “confession”, isn’t evidence, until it is admitted into evidence; all it is now, especially to you, is hearsay. See, in the US, we have what’s called a trial, where evidence is admitted, and the validity of that evidence is judged within the context of other evidence and testimony. Civilized societies don’t condemn people on snap judgements from media reports, unsupported propaganda, hearsay, and juvenile, emotional provocation; terrorists do.

    • MaggieJ

      See the picture of the paramedics working on him – you can clearly see that gauze is being held over a wound on his neck.
      And, there is often incorrect information reported initially, such is the way it goes with “immediate” news. Things get reported before they are confirmed. You should know better than to accept every report as absolute fact before it has been verified.

  • Christopoher

    Bombings and killings will never end until the globalists get their way, and like Bush sr said, they will be successful!

    • MaggieJ

      Pfft. There have been bombings and killings all over world and all throughout history and there will continue to be in the future. It’s nothing to do with ‘globalists’. What a cop out.

  • Christopoher

    Our wonderful full of SHIT Government must think that ALL of us are brain dead or can’t see through the lies that they spout out of there EVIL mouths. They better think again. I for one have been ‘awakening” everyone I know to what kind of CRIMINALS we have in DC. If everyone on here would do the same maybe, just maybe , we can turn this country around and become a DEMOCRACY once again. LETS HOPE SO

    • Cindy Kilgore Yahna

      Excellent comment, I agree with you, we need to let everyone know, and we all can make a difference and turn this country around!

  • David

    Rolling Stone is irrelevant in the age of instant news – they’re yesterday’s coffee grinds.

  • Christopoher

    Most of you can’t distinguish reality from fiction. This is all just theater to you until the day they march you into a FEMA camp.
    They can, and will, do whatever they want, without consequence, because none of you do much of anything to fight this outside of living life vicariously through your computer.
    Stop complying in ever way, shape and form, but that may still not be enough to stop them. The only satisfaction you can hope for is salvation and the knowing that you did everything in your power to stop them.

    • kc5vdj

      You sound as bad as Tsarnaev.

      Are you one of those Tea Traitors who keeps threatening OUR families with a “Civil War”?

      If so, I hope you go down the same way as this sick fuck.

      • ashley110

        i don’t know what Christopher is saying but look at the real facts! there are many unanswered question and stories don;t make sense! he was UNARMED

        • TECH-STERMINATE

          yeah! the real facts! the questions we don’t have answers to! those are facts! not at all speculation! the lack of an answer is a fact!

          shut up.

        • MaggieJ

          So? Obviously there are going to be unanswered questions – at least until the trial. What’s so unusual or suspect about that?

      • Christopoher

        Because you are a dumb brain washed slave perhaps?

        • kc5vdj

          Go back to infowars.

          By the way, when you Tea Traitors start shooting at us Liberals, you have a BIG surprise coming 😉 we are armed, and outnumber you.

          • C0Jones

            So, let’s find out, shall we? When and where?

        • MaggieJ

          Christopher, you do realize you’re the one who believes the crazy, unproven stuff, right? Talk about being brainwashed.

    • MaggieJ

      Who is after you?

  • ashley110

    I wish people could open their minds up and see the truth! but all they do is attack other people for speaking their minds!

  • Christopoher

    I still get a kick out of the fact that they locked down what, 100 square miles?
    Then, they lift the “martial law” and an average everyday citizen finds the kid in his back yard.
    Money and resources well spent.
    Fail.

    • MaggieJ

      The authorities didn’t have the hindsight you need to even make that comment. How were they supposed to know where he’d be found?

      • ashley110

        there were 9,000 police officer were looking for ONE UNARMED GUY

        • MaggieJ

          Yep, and they got him.
          Again, of course, you are assuming they knew he was only 1 guy and that other, maybe more dangerous, plots were not already in the works.

        • DrForrester

          He and his brother shot a cop in the head while he was in his car. Shut the hell up about him being unarmed

          • BoDogit3

            where is the video incriminating this defendant in this shooting you are talking about?

          • DrForrester

            I don’t know. I’m not privy to the police’s evidence file against him

          • BoDogit3

            So Anderson Cooper said so and then they showed this defendants picture. ok

  • m r

    Yeah someone’s going to act like a terrorist to get on the cover of a magaizine.. riiiiiight.

    No. If someone’s going to act like a terrorist, it’s because this country is fucking rotten to the core.

    Tough shit if you don’t like the cover. I think he looks pretty good on it. A good kid corrupted by an immoral, rotten country.

    • DrForrester

      A good kid corrupted by religious fanaticism is what you meant to say

      • Chumscrubber

        No, he meant to say an immoral, rotten country. Maybe he’s referring to immoral, rotten people, who disregard their own laws out of selfish convenience and an irrational appetite for melodramatic revenge.

        • DrForrester

          I’d go with immoral, rotten people. Those are quite often the ones who push the religious fanaticism that turns promising people into tools to wage their private wars

          • m r

            This comment has been removed for violating our commenting policy.

          • DrForrester

            Present them

      • Guest

        This comment has been removed for violating our commenting policy.

      • ME-B

        perhaps he was corrupted by both. I think the magazine’s main point, that he was totally abandoned by his parents, is a valid one. They left him when a boy is most vulnerable–16, 17 years old. He was left alone, so he latched onto his wacko brother. He felt some connection there anyway. And again, I’m not so sure he did anything other than what operatives told him to do. I’m sure the feds had their eyes on these kids for some time, and saw them as capable of carrying out their plan. It’s just a weird scenario, and too convenient for law enforcement–these kids were perfect for their plans.

  • Christopoher

    One thing you need to realize is that the government doesn’t care if your brain dead, smart or anything else, we’re not in their club, we as people are to afraid to do anything no matter how many people are awake, it’s like robbers stealing from your house and don’t do anything about it because they have a gun, if millions take to the streets and start trouble, how long do you think it would take the US military and collective police forces to lock this place down, you see the North American problem is we have to much to lose, people in the Middle East have nothing for the most part, like Gerald Celente said, when people have nothing left to lose they lose it….well my friend we have far far to much left compared to most of the world or population if you will, we won’t start anything because we don’t want to start the ball rolling and give the government reason to lock this country down, because then the government has an excuse to roll out their plan even faster, better yet that’s probably what they are waiting for is for the people to make the first move, then they’ll drop the hammer like we never seen before.

  • Christopoher

    Most people have a very strong psychological ‘need’ to feel in control of their lives. If they accept that our government is absolutely corrupt and out of control, then they also have to accept that they are facing an extremely powerful threat. It makes them feel frightened and out of control of their lives. They can’t cope with it, so they mentally shut down. It’s not they are stupid. They’re just cowardly and weak. I guess that is what happens, though, after generations of a nanny state government all but removing natural selection. Weak genes prevail. FFS there is a tag on my hair dryer warning me not to use it underwater.

    • Cindy Kilgore Yahna

      Impressive comment, truth prevails!

    • DrForrester

      It’s not weak genes that make people stupid

    • John Q. Public

      CIndy? Cindy? Is that you, Cindy? I only ask because Cindy has made the same comment like 4 times now. See, this is what Cindy said just a couple posts ago:

      Most people have a very strong psychological ‘need’ to feel in control of their lives. If they accept that our government is absolutely corrupt and out of control, then they also have to accept that they are facing an extremely powerful threat. It makes them feel frightened and out of control of their lives. They can’t cope with it, so they mentally shut down. It’s not they are stupid. They’re just cowardly and weak. I guess that is what happens, though, after generations of a nanny state government all but removing natural selection. Weak genes prevail

      So, Christopher/Cindy – have you sought medical treatment for your dissociative identity disorder.

      • Cindy Kilgore Yahna

        Stubborn people need to be told 3 to 4 times before they understand, obviously you need to read and re-read. Hopefully, you will get it someday. Good Luck!

        • John Q. Public

          Thank goodness we have you to explain it to us Cindy. How can we ever thank you for sharing with us what those voices in your head keep telling you. We all hope, Cindy, that you and Christopher and they other friends in your head are able to get the medical help you so desparately need.

  • Phillip

    Has anyone else noticed that all the conspiracy-related comments have egregious spelling/grammar mistakes throughout? Come on guys, rip another line of bath salts and get focused!!

    • MaggieJ

      Well, it’s not like they would allow the government to brainwash them into believing how words should be spelled, do you? lol

      • Cindy Kilgore Yahna

        Sheeple, check the spelling on that one! lol

        • MaggieJ

          Sorry, that’s not even a real word. You let someone fool you and manipulate you into believing it is. Tsk.

          • Cindy Kilgore Yahna

            Your comment is not worth commenting on! lol

          • MaggieJ

            Thanks for commenting to let me know. Jeepers, you are whacky.

          • Cindy Kilgore Yahna

            Again, it seems I need to repeat myself, if you resort to calling someone names, first of all you have a first grader mentality, and second of all you are describing yourself. Thank you!

          • MaggieJ

            If you act like you’re whacky, I’ll say you’re whacky. It’s up to you.

          • Cindy Kilgore Yahna

            Yes, you are acting that way! Lol

          • MaggieJ

            I’m really not acting the least bit whacky.

        • Phillip

          I did, AND found the Webster’s Dictionary definition as well and it has a giant photo of my face attached! I never think for myself, I let the government make my decisions for me, and if they can’t, I just hop on board whatever cool new conspiracy theory is trendy this week and I’m good to go!! Speaking of which, I’m still stuck on the whole Batman movie shooting and how its an elaborate hoax to push more gun control. Ugh, I am just sooooo 3 months ago with my conspiracy theory trendiness! TIME FOR A MAKEOVER!! COME ON GIRLS, LETS TURN ON ALEX JONES AND LOG ON TO INFOWARS.COM!!

          • Neil

            Easily one of the best comments on this article, nice one Phillip.

          • Christopoher

            pound sand and eat a shit pie

      • Phillip

        Of course not! Schools are just a big government scam to brainwash everyone into corporate office worker drones for the system man!! I’m guessing the reason the conspiracy theorists have the spelling skills of a 5 year old (even when the computer underlines mis-spelled words in red) is because they were smart enough to drop out of the whole school-corporate-brainwashing scheme early on to gain 300 pounds hiding in their parents’ basement for the rest of their lives. Or, they thought the little red line had something to do with those commie bastards spying on their worthless psycho-babble!! Damn those reds!!

        • MaggieJ

          Schools also teach that the Earth is round and we know you can find plenty of evidence on the Internet that it’s really not. It’s just another scam. lol
          I really do find it funny who the same people who won’t believe anything, will believe anything!

        • Cindy Kilgore Yahna

          Why do you resort to calling other people names and using put downs, instead of using intelligence? Stupid hurts! What ever you are saying about other people is more than likely you in reality! Apparently the truth hurts because your language shouts volumes! I think it is awesome that you are the official spell checker! Kudos to you!!

          • Phillip

            Because I am a giant, pain in the ass cynic who selfishly enjoys occasionally lightening the mood with some narrow-minded, sarcastic, bullshit attempts at cowardly humor using the internet’s guise of anonymity-ish-ness on what I believe to be news-worthy events that mass media and the public as a whole have over-analyzed and dissected to the point that the JFK assassination apparently has some serious relevance to discussion. Which it might, but hey, what the hell do I know because I get my information from everywhere and everything which is run by corporate interest and money so maybe it is all a conspiracy to take away our guns. Unless…. THE CONSPIRACY THEORISTS ARE WORKING FOR THE GOVERNMENT!! TO WEED OUT DISSENSION FROM THE PARTY LINE OF GLOBALIST LIBERAL PROGRESSIVES AND CONSERVATIVE CORPORATE INTEREST! THEY’RE WORKING FOR EACH OTHER AND YOU’RE WORKING FOR THEM!! NOOOOO!!! MY MIND EXPLODED!!! Damn that acid is really kicking in.

  • Christopoher

    So where are the pictures of the confession manifesto the police/cia said Tsarneav wrote all over the plastic boat walls with the ink pen/sharpie he just happened to have in his shirt pocket , along w/ the bombs & grenades?

    • MaggieJ

      Probably in the investigators office waiting to be produced as evidence at the trial.

    • Cindy Kilgore Yahna

      The picture is so fake, he is holding up his shirt for the camera. Really??

      • MaggieJ

        They probably made him do that to show he didn’t have a bomb strapped to him.

        • kc5vdj

          Given these Tea Traitors, I think it might be a good idea to check them out for bombs too.

          Even their buddy Pat Robertson told them to start shooting at us last Wednesday, when he called for a violent Civil War in the USA on the 700 club.

          I say put a KW in his sats, and reclaim the real-estate in space. The ITU says that the “slots” belong to the member nations they are assigned to, and are not owned by private entities under the Treaty. Fuck Pat with a Kinetic Warhead!

    • ME-B

      that’s been my point all along. they say he scribbled some words that prove he did it. OK, then; show us! you have no problem showing us other “evidence.” I’m not saying he’s not guilty, but there’s just something about this whole situation that’s weird. Why all the US Marshals outside the court appearance? Why so many Hum-Vees? What’s the danger? The kid was handcuffed like any other prisoner. I’d call that overkill and grandstanding.

  • marciamanzello

    The only part of this picture that upsets me, is the fact that he is STILL standing. WHY?

    • MaggieJ

      Probably because the authorities hoped to be able to get information on what else they had planned and/or who else might have been involved.

    • Cindy Kilgore Yahna

      Excellent point, and in my last post, he is holding his shirt up for the camera. Doesn’t really look like Tsarnev.

      • MaggieJ

        Who does it look like?

        • Guest

          You find that out yourself, you are the one who is gullible!

          • MaggieJ

            Sorry, Cindy, I’m not the one believing baseless speculation like you are.
            In all seriousness, if you think that might not be Tsarnev in the photo, just who do you think it might be? You must have some factual evidence to back up your comment, don’t you? You wouldn’t believe something with proof, would you?

          • Cindy Kilgore Yahna

            Most people have a very strong psychological ‘need’ to feel in control of their lives. If they accept that our government is absolutely corrupt and out of control, then they also have to accept that they are facing an extremely powerful threat. It makes them feel frightened and out of control of their lives. They can’t cope with it, so they mentally shut down. It’s not they are stupid. They’re just cowardly and weak. I guess that is what happens, though, after generations of a nanny state government all but removing natural selection. Weak genes prevail.

          • MaggieJ

            Christopher thinks so too. Ha.
            PS: You might want to stop replying to and supporting your own posts now.

          • DrForrester

            Copy-pasting other people’s comments I see

          • MaggieJ

            Or the same person posting under two names to make it seem like she/he isn’t the only crazy one.

          • DrForrester

            Good point

          • Neil

            You are an idiot Cindy.

  • Christopoher

    I await the day when most Americans are so dumbed down that the FBI can just show a cheesy CG video of a “terrorist” doing something, and millions of people will go, “SEE! There is PROOF it was him! Even the shirt matches!”

    • Cindy Kilgore Yahna

      Yes, we have people on here commenting, that would believe it as we speak.

      • John Q. Public

        Thank goodness, Cindy, that you are soooooo much smarter than the rest of us and are here to explain it to us. Can you use crayon, though, because I’m having a hard time understanding it so nice pictures in bright cheery colors may make it easier for me to comprehend.

    • MaggieJ

      Do you have any evidence that it is not proof?

    • kc5vdj

      And how many Americans do you plan to kill?

  • TotallyFantastic

    The youth may be inspired by the cover ! thats bullshit RS is print no one under the age of 40 still reads it

  • Christopoher

    The treacherous create the lie, give the sides their playbook and stir
    the pot. While the average American remains confused and deceived, all the
    time unaware of the root cause of their plight and unable to defend
    themselves against it. In the end, Americans end up fighting their own brothers deceitfully camouflaged as their enemy by their oppressor. By way of deception they
    shall prevail.

    • kc5vdj

      And Treason is as treacherous as it gets, Traitor.

  • Frank

    If Boston Magazine is truly trying to reveal a story, they need to donate every penny earned from the upcoming issue to local authorities. As disgraceful as the Rolling Stone cover is, this is just as disgusting. By making a personal decision, that will obviously result in personal fame, former Officer Murphy has chosen to put his interests over that of his brethren. ALL PUBLICITY is GOOD PUBLICITY. These photos just further popularize the heinous actions of a demented kid, and further disintegrate the the chain of command that is necessary for society to function. The media’s popularization is the only thing that separates these 4 murders from the other 14,000/year in the US.

  • ashley110

    Boston bombing: what you are not being told: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wpu6_kArb9U WATCH THIS! this is nothing there are many unanswered question and stories don’t make sense!

    my heart goes to the victims

    • kc5vdj

      What is it with you Tea Traitors? I think it’s time to get all 1950’s on these Tea Traitors!

  • Christopoher

    Is it possible that Sgt. Sean Murphy is a secret whistleblower? In releasing these photos, he has sacrificed his job and quite possibly his safety. Thank you Sean Murphy for releasing these pictures!!!

  • Christopoher

    The entire story about the throat injury was a LIE, wow. How could anyone trust this corrupt government and media establishment. This needs to go VIRAL and this needs to be the headline on the DrudgeReport ASAP

    • Matthew Whelan

      No way you could tell that from these pictures, since the injury was to the back of the throat.

      • MaggieJ

        Actually, there is one photo showing a paramedic holding gauze over a wound sort of under his left ear. There may be other wounds on the back too, though.

      • John Q. Public

        Actually you can tell from these pictures. In the second to last photo published above you see an officer holding a piece of gauze or pressure bandage to the left side of the throat right below the ambu bag that is over the kid’s mouth. Seems pretty obvious to me so I don’t know why folks like Christopher are spouting off without even taking the time to take a detailed look at the photos. Well, I do – the photo doesn’t comport to their preconceived conspiracy theory so its best to just gloss it over and hope no one takes the time to look closely.

        • Cindy Kilgore Yahna

          Actually Hollywood movies can do the same thing with the gauze scene. How do you know the gauze and photos are real? Your type of people like to throw out the “conspiracy theory” jargon, to try to down play the truth. Get real with yourself!

          • MaggieJ

            Um, how do you know it was NOT real?

          • Cindy Kilgore Yahna

            How do you know it was real? Just because someone told you?

          • MaggieJ

            Several different sources have confirmed the same thing and I have seen the photos depicting such. I know you don’t think that’s good enough proof but I hope you realize it is about a million times better than no proof at all, which is what you are relying on.

          • Cindy Kilgore Yahna

            I have all the proof I need, and not sharing it with you, I am not going to hand feed anyone. Do your own research! You are relying on your several different sources. Know the truth and it will set you free!

          • MaggieJ

            LOL. I really, honestly hope you do not expect anyone to take you seriously.
            I have evidence to back up my claims and I have no reason not to share it. Apparently, you don’t want to share your evidence, which is really rather suspect in and of itself.

          • Cindy Kilgore Yahna

            I hope you do not expect me to take you seriously. You are becoming a bore now! Lol

          • MaggieJ

            Nope, I don’t care if you take me seriously nor not. You have proven to me that your opinion has very little value or import.

          • Cindy Kilgore Yahna

            Thank you for sharing your feeble comment. Totally boring, come up with something innovative! Maybe, you will be taken seriously.

          • MaggieJ

            Again, it makes no difference to me if a bunch of people I don’t know on an Internet message board take me seriously or not. I am making my comments and they stand for what they are – people can take them or leave them. It makes no difference to me, I’m just killing time here.

          • John Q. Public

            Maggie, just give it up. The thing about schizophrenics is that they believe the voices in their head are real and there’s nothing you can say or do to convince them otherwise. Cindy is just like that – she has no idea how wacked out she is and there is nothing you can do or say ot convince her otehrwise. Just read her posts – the photos are real and show that the government lied until they don’t show that the government lied and then they aren’t real. You just can’t argue logically, Maggie, with someone who is so nonsensical. You have made a valiant effort, but your time and energy is better spent elsewhere because you will never convince Cindy (or Chirstopher) that the voices in their head are not real.

          • Cindy Kilgore Yahna

            I feel sorry for you that you were diagnosed a schizophrenic and resort to name calling. Stupid hurts! You sound quite nonsensical. Have fun with the voices in your head.

          • John Q. Public

            Thanks, Cindy, for the additional confirmation that you aren’t capable of a single original thought and are reduced to repeating what others have told you.

  • ashley110

    he was UNARMED!

  • Christopoher

    They lie about everything, is it so surprising? American Politics is the biggest reality tv show on the prison planet.

    • Neil

      You should probably just go right ahead and kill yourself if this place is so bad.

  • ugh

    This would make a good Rolling Stone cover. What do you think of this one Jann Wenner, you freak.

    • ashley110

      he died before he could tell his side of the story, you are sick!!

      • hoho

        Cry for the terrorist you stupid twit! WAAAAAAHHHH!!!!!!!

        • ashley110

          he wasn’t even proven guilty, same with Dzhokhar HE’s NOT proven guilty yet. some of you are already labeling him as a terrorist what happened to “innocent until proven guilty!!

          • hoho

            What happened to you? Stupid twit boo hooing over terrorist scum. Is this his wife? The one with the Rhode Island doctor for a father? If so, you should be in jail as well.

          • ashley110

            you look more stupid to me! he was NOT proven guilty! that just show how IGNORANT you are ! i don’t even wanna argue!!

          • hoho

            I just wish his little brother looked like that as well. outrage for that scum instead of their victims. You are what is wrong with this country. Another elite-st spoiled brat too stupid to give a crap about her own country. Don’t reproduce, we do not need any more of your kind.

          • hoho

            Run along, I have other angles of the shot. Dead terrorist bad, live terrorist good? You probably cry more for that terrorist scum than your own parents. Frigging traitor. Is this Jane Fonda?

      • hoho

        He attacked unarmed civilians. He died. The end. Hope he suffered too.

        • ashley110

          he wasn’t proven guilty! you sure jump to conclusion too quick! look at the real facts! WAKE UP!

          • MaggieJ

            Calm down. No poster on this message board has the power to convict him and send him to prison. However, everyone is entitled to draw their own conclusions based on the facts as we know them so far and, so far, the evidence against him is overwhelming.

          • kc5vdj

            I have enough right now to get hoho on a cyberstalking charge if he doesn’t edit that post above. He knows which one.

            The funny thing is, that he doesn’t recognize that I’m against the Tsarnaev supporters here. I guess he can’t read.

          • libtards unite

            You have attacked about ten posters on here. if anyone goes to jail for threats on here it would be you.

          • kc5vdj

            He went to WAR against the USA. War is war. We don’t waste time on trials in war.

          • hoho

            Honey, I don’t think that dude on the table is going to wake up.

            BBBBBWWWWAAAAAAAHHHHHHHAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!

    • hoho

      He looks tired. LOL

      • ashley110

        i don’t care what you think about dzhokhar but putting a pic of a dead man that is just sick!

        • hoho

          Just as sick as putting his rat bastard brother on the cover of that magazine. This is the free speech all you America hating libs like to see. deal with it.

          • kc5vdj

            Actually, sounds more like a Tea Traitor to me.

          • hoho

            k

          • kc5vdj

            What are you going to do, have one of your Tea Traitor pals send me Ricin or Anthrax?

            Are you supporting Tsarnaev and his brother too like the other Alex Jones Tea Traitors here?

            How many Americans are you planning to kill, Tea Traitor?

            Your comment above was just flagged as a credible threat. In fact, I’m about to call the magazine. I’m taking this as a threat against my life by a Tsarnaev supporter.

          • libtards unite

            What are you ranting about? Why are you threatening people with a ham radio callsign as your user ID? Are you really that stupid?

          • kc5vdj

            Who is threatening whom? The only threats here seem to come from the Tea Traitors, as usual.

            Do Tea Traitors have a problem with the idea that if the Tea Traitors start shooting at Liberals, that Liberals might shoot back? If that is considered a threat, you need your head examined.

            Anytime you Tea Traitors feel froggy. You’ll have a HUGE surprise coming! ALL OF AMERICA has been taking your Civil War threats seriously!!!

            Keep spreading your anti-Government propaganda. You might get some converts to your side to help you kill Americans.

        • kc5vdj

          This comment has been removed for violating our commenting policy.

    • hoho

      Maybe Jann Wenner can airbrush this one and make it glamorous.

  • ashley110

    Then they said he refused to lift his jumper yet their is clear evidence that he did!

  • Christopoher

    Whoa, it looks as though this picture is just like a smoking gun. It is clearly visible that there is NO wound to his neck whatsoever. W0W! Yes, there is his left side that is captured in a shadow, but I would think that such a wound would spread blood into the visible area that we can see. His throat seems devoid of any blood at all.
    We can safely assume this because if you analyze the flow of blood from his nose, it follows the path down the right side of his cheek. If he had a bloody wound on his neck, the blood would follow a similar path. Gravity is a bitch.

    • Neil

      The smoking gun to go with your smoking pipe.

      • Christopoher

        This comment has been removed for violating our commenting policy.

        • hoho

          English please.

          • kc5vdj

            “Fucking lost soul” = Tea Traitor talk meaning “Non-Christian”.

        • MaggieJ

          Aw, calm down, Nancy.

        • Neil

          Your true self is showing.

          • Neil

            By the way, you realize no one spells your name Christopoher right? Is that a typo?

    • MaggieJ

      That you cannot personally see the wound sure as heck doesn’t mean it isn’t there.
      I mean, really, how gullible would someone have to believe that this speculation you invented in your head has any legitimacy at all? If you do not think there is a wound on his throat, prove it with facts and evidence. Unlike you, most of us don’t fall for believing everything we hear.

      • Christopoher

        Prove to me your not a Sock puppet other then that eat a shit pie !

        • kc5vdj

          The Tea Traitor parroting Alex Jones and Glenn Beck calling someone a “sock puppet”.

          How many Americans do you intend to kill, Christopher?

          • Christopoher

            Really Cop what next want to ask me to look at your 14 year old girl naked?

          • kc5vdj

            Yeah, you have a point, 14 is a bit old for you Tea Traitors….Most of the Tea Traitors getting caught like them MUCH younger.

          • Christopoher

            Go play with your toys in your basement and leave comments to real people.

          • kc5vdj

            This comment has been removed for violating our commenting policy.

        • MaggieJ

          Sure. Sock puppets cannot type. I am typing this reply to you and so that proves I am not a sock puppet.
          Your turn, now. :)

  • Christopoher

    Friday evening must be Zionist troll meetings, oh where oh where have all the inbred trolls gone or where oh where can they be?

    • kc5vdj

      Ah, definite Tea Traitor!

      • Christopoher

        This comment has been removed for violating our commenting policy.

      • ByTheWay

        What does that mean “Tea Traitor”?

        • kc5vdj

          Tea Traitors are what the “Tea Party” is now known as because of their organizing for and threats of a Civil War.

          “to suppress Insurrections” trumps all.

          They threaten OUR families with “Civil War” if they don’t get their way? Fuck them. Fuck them in the ear with a Hellfire missile.

          • ByTheWay

            I thought TEA meant Taxed Enough Already. How is that a traitor? Is that not what our country was founded on and became independent from British rule to tax us? That makes no sense that they would be considered a traitor. We are taxed too much! Now I understand why the IRS was targeting them politically. The government spends 17 trillion and the TEA party wants it stopped and they are considered the traitors? Hummmmmmm?

          • kc5vdj

            You don’t keep up with the Tea Treason. Issa made them cover up that they were investigating Progressive groups over 2:1. Yes, persecution was going on. 98 Tea Traitor groups investigated, over 202 Progressive groups.

            Issa is now facing Expulsion.

            Oh, and you and your Tea Traitor pals seem to think it’s cool to threaten Civil War. Fuck you too. Threaten OUR families, and the moment you start shooting, yours is not exempt. Remember that.

          • ByTheWay

            Please provide link to your claim about Issa. I have not read it. Otherwise, take your meds you seem really hostile.

  • ashley110

    so many people with closed minds here i don’t even wanna argue!do some of your own research! then you will find the real facts! there are many answered questions and stories don’t make sense! you get attacked for telling your opinion, what a sad world!!

    • MaggieJ

      So, tell us some of these facts.

      • Christopoher

        Learn the truth from your research stop asking to be fed!

        • MaggieJ

          My research shows that you are making assumptions and speculation without any basis in fact.
          If you have evidence to support your comments, I cannot find it.

        • Cindy Kilgore Yahna

          That is a good comment! Well stated!

      • ashley110

        i commented in my previous post but i’ll comment it again ! these are nothing there are more! i don’t wanna argue because i get attack for speaking my mind!
        radical extremists are proud of their actions and more than happy to die for their cause. In fact, they WANT to be killed because in their head, they will be martyrs that go to heaven. they don’t hide in a boat and wait for police to catch them!i never heard of a terrorist hiding and running for his life after committing g an act of terrorism. after the attack they went back to their normal lives, they could leave this country or flee out of the country but they didn’t! they faces were on the biggest news networks what were they suppose to do, not run! there are 9,000 officers are following you, whole country hates you, THEY GAVE them no choice, they were FORCED to flee, they were already labeled as terrorists MONSTERS..our enemies. if the police didn’t kill them , somebody form the general public more than likely would have. THEY NEVER HAD A CHOICE! will you people stop listening to news and look at real facts! if they did this i wanna SEE THE Proof , if they can release pics of the shootout, why can;t they release the footage of them placing the bags? what taking them so long? it’s been more than 3 months! some people are already considering him as the terrorist and he’s NOT even proven guilty yet! i believe in “INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY” he has a sniper laser beam pointed at the dead-center of his forehead but he has his hands up to surrender and is clearly showing no threat, and just the fact that the police brutality went this far is insane. all i see two guys wearing bags, walking around. they were not the only ones with the backpacks they were thousands of people with backpacks. both exploded bags were black but jahar has white backpack and tamerlan had grey backpack. it was reported by authorities that there were 5 bombs there that day(you don’t know this because you don’t pay attention to real facts).hat one of the exploded backpacks exactly matched that of one of the Navy Seals/Craft International security personnel working the Marathon that day.jahar and tamerlans DNA DID NOT MATCH ON THE pressure cookers but it match with FEMALE DNA. you will still winder how he got that neck wound when police were the only one shooting at him. that day Boston Globe tweeted about “bomb drills” and “bomb squad activities” the day of the marathon, with one of the tweets being sent in close proximity to the time when the actual bombs were detonated.that day hat the authorities deleted photographs and videos from the phones and cameras of spectators at the marathon. here’s a witness talking about deleted pics: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v… . there was NO blood on the outside of the boat until AFTER Dzhokhar surrendered. there was no blood in that boat but on the stair case of the boat which means he was shot after he got out. its SAD people are NOT even looking at the real facts, there are many inconsistencies in this case.i DID MY OWN RESEARCH!

        • MaggieJ

          Are you sure you weren’t involved? You do seem to think you know a lot about what the bombers were thinking.

          • ashley110

            see like i said i will be attacked for telling my opinion!!!! exactly that’s what happened!

          • MaggieJ

            You’ll be attacked for acting foolishly. It’s your call, don’t blame me.

          • kc5vdj

            Support a monster, while parroting Traitors like Alex Jones and Glenn Beck, and you will get called on it.

          • kc5vdj

            ashley is probably polishing her ak-47 in her parlour in kentucky pining for the day she can kill Americans too.

      • ByTheWay

        I wonder why the picture of the suspect provided by FBI shows a light colored backpack and yet the backpacks that contained bombs were black as shown in all the photos. Can you please explain that?

        • MaggieJ

          Could it be that the suspect had more than one backpack? I don’t know. Those sorts of details will most likely come out and be explained in the trial.
          What’s your point?

          • ByTheWay

            My point is there are lots of unanswered questions. I am not making judgments on something that media tells me to do because they have been known to lie and sensationalize stories. NBC is being sued for editing a 911 tape and ABC edited a bloody picture of a person charged in another high profile case. This is done on purpose to persuade public opinion. I feel it is wrong and should be criminal to do so. Edward Bernays would be so proud of these networks.

          • MaggieJ

            You should question everything, definitely. However, when there is evidence to prove one thing or another, you should be willing to accept it.

            Refusing to believe anything, is just as stupid as blindly believing everything. Let the facts dictate your opinion.

          • ByTheWay

            What facts? There have not been any proven facts. There are suspects and there is an event but nothing has been proven yet. Just opinions published in the news. Their news opinions/stories change like the wind. I will wait for the trial and see the evidence before I convict anyone of such a heinous act.

          • Chumscrubber

            Exactly. Too many reactionary, hypocrite sheeple who think their banter will somehow compromise the freedom of the press and due process.

        • Cindy Kilgore Yahna

          Excellent point!

          • ByTheWay

            I thought it very odd that day that there were so many FBI agents pictured. Were they there because of the reported drill that was going on?

  • Hunter

    i, was offended by both photos .
    The one with him standing , with a
    red dot locked .
    Opportunity Missed
    I haven’t always felt this way.
    But ; it irkes me that there are folks
    from around the world that Hate me; and have never met me.
    I am not that unlikeable !
    A good many other humans from the
    USA aren’t all bad either; till you start
    Hating us.
    Please, someone explain it to me and others .

  • Christopoher

    The war is over! Tyranny will reign!

    • kc5vdj

      And what do you Tea Traitors plan to give us?

      • civilwarsoon

        80 million armed Americans and a military that hates you and you monkey leader; gee I wonder what America will give you, stupid commie POS

        • kc5vdj

          google 2385.

          i support drones, atomic bombs, and vx gas against you if you try.

          “to suppress Insurrections” trumps your fantasy.

          oh, and thanks for proving my point, petty tyrant.

          Threatening OUR families with Civil War is rather stupid, seeing how well armed we are now because of you Tea Traitors making such threats. Whenever you feel froggy and start, you will find your families are not exempt. Fair is fair.

          Do you celebrate John Wilkes Booth’s birthday just like Rand Paul’s top staffer does?

        • kc5vdj

          .

      • katarina broman

        Tea Traitors?? You live on benefits, am I right!?

  • Spinner

    I read the article and this is for people who have not read it. Rolling Stone wanted to be edgy and they thought it was cool that pic looked like Jim Morrison since you know they are like magazine about iconic rock stars. But they went too far. The article romanticizes terrorist Jahar and is just as DISGUSTING as the Teen Beat cover. Beautiful boy, soulful eyes – R U Kidding me? Who says this about cold blooded remorseless killer??? Brothers were lazy potsmokers who never had real jobs and Americans paid for their welfare and this dirtbag Jahar even got scholarship to go to college. Jahar wasted his college by smoking pot and he was failing classes. They blame financial problems on parents who left for Russia and “boring” college. The article was more about blaming society and everyone else to humanize Jahar as the poor soul victim. The cover was appropriate for article because both wanted to make you feel sorry for Jahar. Even though he killed maimed 250+ Americans and partied and prob smoked pot after bombing. They just never thought they would get caught with camera. It was both OFFENSIVE COVER and ARTICLE and Rolling Stone just trying to be edgy and sell magazine. Too bad the author and editors did not lose any family members to the bombings to see how disgusting and hurtful to victims this had caused. Oh yeah that Manson cover was 20 years ago and at least the editor at that time had decency not to use Manson picture that looked like Teen Beat or teen rock star. Mugshot would have shown this is what happens when you KILL PEOPLE! IDIOT Tasteless Editors! Somewhere in jail Jahar is smiling that he got on cover. Sickening to everyone esp victims.

    • kc5vdj

      They say Jefferey Dahmer was the All-American Kid Next Door that you’d want your sister to screw.

      That doesn’t change the fact that he was a fucking monster.

      Same thing here. Rolling Stone can suck it. Along with Tsarnaev’s girlfriend, Christopher.

    • MaggieJ

      My take on it was that they were trying to illustrate that someone who appears to be a pretty normal kid can actually become a terrorist. Are you sure you read the article?

      • Spinner

        I know that was defense Rolling Stone gave but given the mass outrage don’t you think a cover and story can convey other multiple meanings that are insulting and PAINFUL to the Boston victims? “Beautiful boy… soulful eyes” – who would say that BS about cold blooded killer except if you had AGENDA and were trying to romanticize the MAN. I repeat a MAN not a clueless innocent BOY but an ADULT who CHOSE to SMOKE POT all the time, FAIL CLASS and KILL and MAIM all those innocent Americans in name of Muslim religion. Just because Rolling Stone says it was all for journalism does not mean it was not DISTASTEFUL, HURTFUL, PAINFUL to Boston Victims and any sensible person who saw the cries and screams of those he hurt. Jahar is smiling in jail because he got his favorite facebook picture on cover of glamorous Rolling Stone. Don’t you think that is SICK?

      • Spinner

        I know that was defense given by Rolling Stone but given the mass outrage don’t you think there can be multiple other meanings from the cover and story that is HURTFUL and PAINFUL to the victims? “Beautiful boy… Soulful Eyes” – who says this BS about a cold blooded killer unless they have AGENDA and want to romanticize the MAN. I repeat a MAN and not clueless innocent BOY. A MAN who chose to smoke pot, fail class, KILL and MAIM hundreds of innocent Americans and then PARTY afterwards. Just because Rolling Stone says it was it all for journalism does not mean it was not DISTASTEFUL, HURTFUL, PAINFUL to victims and any sensible person who saw the cries and screams that he caused. Jahar is in jail smiling because he got his favorite facebook picture on glamorous Rolling Stone. Don’t you think that is SICK or you just as heartless as the editors of Rolling Stone?

        • MaggieJ

          Journalism can be distasteful, hurtful and painful. That’s OK.

          • Spinner

            Yes you are heartless like editor and obviously don’t see the point and why there is mass outrage. Maybe one day something really bad will happen to you too like cancer or losing both your legs from accident and you can tell yourself that its OK.

          • MaggieJ

            Life is tragic sometimes. Closing our eyes to it doesn’t change anything. Journalism is supposed to reflect what is going on in the world and, yes, sometimes it is sad and uncomfortable and terrible. That’s life, though.

          • Spinner

            Let me ask you this – if your parents or children or sibling close to you were killed or maimed in the bombing – would you feel the same way about the cover and story?

  • ashley110

    all see is people with hate in their minds

    • kc5vdj

      Why didn’t you marry Tsarnaev? You seem to be one of his biggest fans. You might want to watch out for Christopher, you might make him jealous.

      • Christopoher

        This comment has been removed for violating our commenting policy.

        • libtards unite

          Most Rolling Stone readers would enjoy that. Jann Wenner would.

        • kc5vdj

          When you Tea Traitors Insurrect, you will find that America doesn’t want summer camps for people like you. We will want summary executions for people like you.

          Anytime you Tea Traitors feel froggy.

          “to suppress Insurrections”…no rules.

      • ashley110

        WELL TRUTH HURTS ISN’T! all i am doing is tell my opinion and i get attacked! it just shows how close minded people are!i advice you to do some of your own research!

        • kc5vdj

          I do my own research every day. This is why a sniper is on Alex Jones 24/7. All he has to do is tell people like you to start shooting at us Liberals, and I want the sniper to pull that trigger.

          People like you will.

        • John Peterson

          I’d advise you to learn the difference between advice and advise.

          Also I and I’d, but I don’t want to overload you.

  • Sickofbullsht

    The left side of his body is dark so you can’t see clearly, but the entire front of his DARK sweatshirt IS soaking with what looks like blood. The photo of his head tilted, he’s got blood all on the left side of his face. That is most certainly blood spatter upward from a shot. It’s a sequence. He’s reaching his hand up towards his left, then he collapses forward. He took a shot there, and he’s bleeding. It’s in the left side of the neck. DUH. And the officer is putting pressure on his neck. It’s very obvious. Conspiracy theorists and pseudo-intellectuals: YOU are the ones who see what you want to see then go on and on and on and ON yapping nonsensical, which is what all this boring, useless, back and forth commentary is. I wish there was a way to shut you up. Just because we have freedom to blab doesn’t mean you should not exercise self-control, silence to REALLY THINK before you go on with your crap. That’s the problem. Yap yap yap yap yap. Ooooo I looooove to hear myself talk. I am sooooo smart. I am the enlightened one and everyone else is stupid. The biggest bullshit talkers are the most uneducated, yet think they are brillian…and usually have accomplished little. Too busy talking sh*t.

    • Christopoher

      This comment has been removed for violating our commenting policy.

      • kc5vdj

        This is so fucking funny. Mr. Infowars brainwashed drone calling people insane.

  • George thomson

    I’m just wondering where the next escalation in photos will take us? The rationale for leaking these new ones doesnt add up, and may prove totally counter- productive.

  • Christopoher

    Obama: ‘Trayvon Martin could have been me 35 years ago’

    • MaggieJ

      That’s very true. Thanks for sharing it.

      • kc5vdj

        Christopher was just establishing his “Conservative” credentials. I think you misunderstood intent.

        • MaggieJ

          I think you missed that I was making a mockery of his silly post.

  • Christopoher

    This comment has been removed for violating our commenting policy.

    • kc5vdj

      Obviously you won’t.

  • ashley110

    OK why don’t you people go do some of your own research rather than hating on people who tell their opinions! people are so disrespectful!

    • kc5vdj

      Disrespectful? I think the City of Boston might have a word or two to educate you on respect.

      Does Tsarnaev make you all wet and horny or something?

      • Guest

        fkajlkfjlasjfls;fjdlsajfk

    • MaggieJ

      Opinions are not worth respect if they cannot be backed up.

      • ashley110

        i know we all have different opinions and i respect that and i was telling mine! i don’t attack people for telling their opinions.

        • kc5vdj

          Thomas Jefferson would disagree. Indeed, his argument in favor of the First Amendment was that if an idiot cannot be shouted down, then there is no sense in even having such an amendment.

          You support Tsarnaev. You should be called on that. That is our right to freedom of speech.

          Why is it that you Tea Traitors feel that you are the only ones who have such a right to free speech?

          • ashley110

            i believe in “innocent until proven guilty”

        • MaggieJ

          Back up your opinions with some facts and evidence and maybe you’ll get the respect you seem to think you deserve.
          Keep weeping and wailing about being ‘attacked’ and you probably won’t. You get to choose.

          • ashley110

            i know if i tell you facts and show evidence then you gonna say like last time you said if i was involved!

          • MaggieJ

            Excuse me? I haven’t seen you provide any facts or evidence and so have no idea what you mean by “last time”.
            You’re welcome to try again, though. I’m here for another 10 mins or so. Again, it’s your call.

          • ashley110

            it’s gonna be long! so you have to wait dear!

          • MaggieJ

            OK. I’m waiting.

          • ashley110

            i starting now because i had to make another post

      • Chumscrubber

        Maybe you should observe your own tenets, hypocrite.

        • MaggieJ

          I’ve provided back up for my opinions. If there is some issue you feel I have not properly backed up, please let me know and I’ll be happy to elaborate.

          • Chumscrubber

            Already have. In classic hypocrite form, you abandoned your inflammatory remarks without support.

          • MaggieJ

            Sorry, you’ll need to provide some evidence that I have done that. I’m not about to take your word for it.

          • Chumscrubber

            Read your own pablum; you’ve been frantically defecating your irrelevant conjecture and hyperbole for hours now. Make yourself useful and lobby Congress to improve public transportation systems within this country so innocent children don’t have to die unnecessarily in car wrecks. Tsarnaev’s photo on the cover of Rolling Stone isn’t going anywhere, and it isn’t killing anyone. Too many impetuous ninnies in this country with more time on their hands than sense in their heads.

  • Perilous Liberty

    Does he mean when the police basically trod all over Bostonians’ 3rd & 4th amendment rights?

  • John Peterson

    I think the next cover of rolling stone should be this officers balls.

    • MaggieJ

      I don’t believe he has any. It’s all a government lie.

      • John Peterson

        He knew what would happen to him the minute he released those pictures. I don’t agree with the illegal searches, but this has nothing to do with that. He is correcting the false glamorization of a terrorist at the potential cost of his job.

        In my opinion they should have shot this POS “trying to escape”. But that is why I am not a cop.

        • MaggieJ

          I don’t personally see any reason or benefit to publishing these pictures. The RS cover just isn’t all that important and everyone already knows who the suspected bomber is – his photo has been all over the news.

          As for shooting him, we need to remember that they didn’t know if other plots were planned or underway or if others might have been involved. There was a good reason to try to keep the suspect alive, if they could. And apparently, they could.

          • John Peterson

            OK. But we live in a cult of celebrity and in my opinion publishing these photos not only too courage, but offsets the glamorization of a killer.

            You had a good point about not shooting him.
            btw, are you down voting me? I thought we were being civil Maggs.

  • Brian Glennie

    Has Tsarnaev been tried and convicted already!!
    Remember that the brothers were shot in the throat when they were apprehended to insure that they could not respond to accusations.
    Has Craft International Security operatives, who were seen carrying black backpacks at the bomb site, been cleared of any complicity!!
    To orchestrate the military shut down of a major city is quite a feat!!

    • MaggieJ

      Where did you get the idea that the brothers were both shot in the throat? It was initially reported that the younger one shot himself in the throat but that was proven to be incorrect shortly thereafter.
      Who is providing you with your information? I think they might be trying to fool you and you should not let them. Check the facts for yourself.

      • ashley110

        witnesses tell that police vehicle ran over tamerlan and then they shot him!

    • Guest

      witnesses tell that police vehicle ran over tamerlan and then they shot him

      • MaggieJ

        Which witnesses and has their account been proven to be accurate or could they have mistaken the suspect vehicle for the police vehicle?

        • ashley110

          it was a police suv!

  • Aaron

    People need to stop bitching about rolling stone putting Tsarnaev on there front cover. Time magazine had Osama Bin Laden on the front cover and nobody said anything about that. I also wonder how we find it a huge shock when some radical muslim sets off a bomb over here. We are over in there countries killing there people and sending drone strikes into people homes and destroying there civilization. What we have done in Iraq and Afghanistan makes this attack look like NOTHING! Maybe if we stop starting wars for absolutly no reason but for the government and big buisness to make money then maybe people will stop attacking us! Most of us Americans are such idiots!!!

    • Cindy Kilgore Yahna

      Excellent comment, Aaron!

    • Chumscrubber

      Yup, tragically true Aaron.

    • Spinner

      Do you think America is intentionally aiming Drones at families and children? Are you another Jahar? It is power mongering Talibans who are surrounding themselves with families and children as human shields! Those people care more about keeping power than safety of their people. It is same monsters who will force men to join them or die. It is same monsters who keep women subservient and uneducated so that they can have 20 wives and stone the wife when the husband has affair. It is these people you are defending. If it was not for help of Americans, the communist Russians would have taken over those countries. Yes there is double standard – when Taliban kill and suicide bomb their own people there is no outrage. You sounds like another pothead Jahar who will believe anything the Taliban puts on the internet.

      • Aaron

        Did you see the video released by Bradley Manning in which reporters were shot dead from an apache helicopter and when emergency vehicles arrived they shot them dead too! youre just another brainwashed American who believes everything their government and news outlets tell them! And by the way we sent weapons to the Taliban when the Russians invaded Afghanistan. We didnt even belong in Afghanistan becuase as it turns out Osama Bin Laden wasnt even in Afghanistan!

        • Spinner

          Yes I saw it and the soldiers made a MISTAKE when they saw them carrying weapons. In war when you are being shot at all day that can happen. Especially when the Iraqi fighters are dressed like civilians. In war MISTAKES happen like in every other war innocent people can die on battlefield. But it is so easy to watch video and blame America and call it evil isn’t it? Maybe if you enlisted in army you can see that figuring out who is bad and good guy is not so easy. I copied pasted explanation below.

          CNN investigated the cause of the confusion and found that the soldiers had been under fire all morning from rocket-propelled grenades (RPGs) and small arms that day. The two Apaches had been dispatched to assist ground troops with clearing the small-scale insurgencies in that area. The Pentagon has insisted that the soldiers had no way of differentiating the photojournalists from insurgents.

          • Aaron

            Im guessing you have an explanation for the emergency responders that came to help and were shot too?

          • Isabella Adamowicz

            Exactly, there were even instances of friendly fire. Who would blame Aaron for that? It is a war, where decisions are taken in the split seconds. Those armchair critics are pathetic.

        • Spinner

          Giving weapons and logistics and supplies I would consider being a BIG HELP that you simply brush off because it would actually make America look good. Let me ask you this how else do you fight the Russians except with weapons and supplies? I am proud to be immigrant American because this country has given my family amazing opportunities that we worked hard for. So you can call me brainwashed but what are you? Do you so easily believe the same Taliban propoganda as Jahar?

        • We all know who the owners are

          If you actually live in America, denounce your citizenship and get over there and make a difference. You can do it! 1st you’ll have to put down your smartphone, x-box-call of duty special ops headset, and Starbucks latte. Go live your convictions.

    • Pug

      their, absolutely…
      Source: Dictionary

    • Spinner

      Remember why we are even in Afghanistan? The country has no resources we want – it was to fight terrorism and Taliban after 9/11, and the ironic thing we are trying to help rebuild their country so they are not controlled by the radical muslims. We have good intentions but it gets washed out by the radical muslim propaganda.

      • Aaron

        See if you knew anything about the conflict you would know the Taliiban wasnt even behing 9/11 and it was Al-Qeada that was.

        • Spinner

          Taliban was working with Osama and Al Queda. So what is your point?

          • Aaron

            Actually the Taliban Condemned Bin Ladens actions and im not getting this from Taliban propoganda as you seem to assume i am, this is fact! The Talibans foriegn minister denounced the attacks. Also the fact that as we were ravaging afghanistan Bin Laden happened to be in Pakistan the whole time and the U.S. government knew about it for the past 6 years, and yet we are still in Afghanistan fighting an endless war and sending our youth to an unjustifiable death.

          • Isabella Adamowicz

            Talk is cheep. They set up the camps that trained the terrorists. So from one side of the mouth they scream Jihad , death to America, from the other side of the mouth the denounced the attack. LOL! As I said, talk is cheep. You sow the wind, you reap the whirlwind.

          • Aaron

            they denounced the attack until we invaded there country and now they hate us, and they should hate us for what we have done. The reason they scream death to America is becuase we occupy their country.

          • Isabella Adamowicz

            You have problems with memory? Taliban was in power in Afghanistan then, run camps for training terrorist from all over the world, on the territory of Afghanistan, In those camps terrorists that attacked on September 11 trained. They harbored Bin Laden , who was the organizer of an attack, they refused to give him up. Do you think any country would have tolerated such an aggression against itself? It was a declaration of war, war the got. Cry me a river.

          • Aaron

            they harbored bin laden until we got there and then he went to pakistan in 2003, so what were we doing in there for the past 10 years. we knew he was in Pakistan so why did we stay in Afghanistan with no real objective. And if you actually checked your facts you would know that war was never declared.

          • Isabella Adamowicz

            Do you think Bin Laden each time he moved his base notified Americans where he was going. ? It took a lot of surveillance, time and sacrifice to get him. Between Pakistan and Afghanistan is a a territory of war lords, that don’t answer to anyone. Armchair generals like you only can only make people laugh.! LOL!

        • runnerbp

          Aaron, perhaps you missed the discussion with the Taliban to stop harboring AQ and Bin Laden. There were very good reasons to go in there. Unfortunately the complexity of the problem was worse and even created by our abandoning the Mujahideen after the Soviets left.

          • Aaron

            Yes but by the time we got there Osama wasnt even in Afghanistan anymore. And Russia is harboring Snowden that doesnt mean we should go into russia and kill there people too!

      • danielXY

        Afghanistan has no resources??? 😀

        Please, read informations about rarely elements we all need in technical things…

        • Spinner

          You are saying we attacked Afghanistan for smartphones instead of 9/11 terrorist attack? Oh MY GOD Its people like you that make Jahar look really smart.

          • Aaron

            we dont make jahar look smart, i personally condemn his actions. You just make us Americans look stupid. All Afghanistan is 11 years of accomplishing nothing!

          • Spinner

            STUPID??? Lets go back to your first rant. Time magazine is news outlet so having Osama on cover is not same as Jahar on cover of celebrity rock star magazine Rolling Stone! You are IDIOT! I mean BIG TIME DIOT if I have to spoon feed you that.

            You say we start wars for nothing? Afghanistan was because THEY BOMBED 9/11 and killed thousands of innocent Americans.

            And as I remember we attacked Iraq first time to SAVE Kuwait because Saddam invaded it. YOU DON’T DESERVE to BE IN AMERICA because you are just IDIOT like JAHAR who will easily believe in same monsters will force you into their relgion or DIE!! My god its like talking to baby over and over. Go back to Taliban cave where you came from.

          • Spinner

            Just know that men can be very selfish and will twist things to gain power in how you live and over what you think. They will not think twice about sacrificing your life or your family’s life to keep their power. I believe only when women gain more power will moderation come about and society progress.

          • Isabella Adamowicz

            Perhaps when women in Muslim countries will get equality, and not face rape if they are not covered , till that wonderful time…

          • Spinner

            Women are just as smart or smarter than men. You see this everywhere in America and other developed countries. It is very sad that all that brain power and intellect is pushed down and they are even denied education. They cannot be used to help build society up. They are jailed, raped or physically beaten to maintain the power of chauvinstic men.

          • Aaron

            First of all we have something in America called the 1st amendment which guarentees freedom of the press so people should stop complaining about jahar being on the front cover. Second of all we attacked Iraq in the Gulf wat to save Kuwait. Then we went to war again with Iraq claiming they had WMD’s but after the war we found no WMD’s. So we had no reason to be in Iraq. And when did i say i believe what the Taliban says? you just believe to many of the lies our power hungry government tells you.

          • danielXY

            Absolutly right!

            The most terrorist from 9/11 were from Saudi Arabia, so why america never attack them? That are facts

          • Aaron

            you speak the truth my friend!

          • danielXY

            I hope you unterstand what i want to say 😀

            My english is a german english :-)

          • Aaron

            i understand it and youre absolutly right. and this Spinner guy is trying to justify us going into these countries and killing people and he just makes americans look like idiots.

          • danielXY

            Very nice to see that there are still people in america who uses their brain for thinking 😉

          • Aaron

            There are very few of us unfortunetly.

          • danielXY

            I trust in you man!

            Best wishes to you and spinner from germany.

            Never stop beeing critical with everything goverments tell us :-)

          • Aaron

            Is your government in Germany corrupt too? Becuase we have a pretty corrupt government.

          • Isabella Adamowicz

            Elementarily, dear Watson, because Ben Laden was operating from Afghanistan.

          • Aaron

            check your facts he was in pakistan the whole time!

          • CorrectionPlease

            They sell us oil at exhorbitant prices.

            They control our banks with the profit.

            They buy our politicians.

            Is there some mystery here?

          • Spinner

            In same way there is freedom of press there is freedom for expression for me and everyone else to criticize the stupid and distasteful cover of Rolling Stone. So should we be silent like you say? Maybe you need to grow up, think and be more sensitive to what that cover means. Or learn to care more about other people and how victims feel when they see that magazine in store or on web. Yes I agree 2nd war in iraq was intelligence failure as they did not find any WMD which I believe 9/11 attack helped encourage. It was a bad decision especially since Saddam was secular leader and not religious nut.

          • Aaron

            i just dont see why people complain about the rolling stone putting Jahar on the cover. its not going to change anything. And had they read the contents in the article they would understand why they chose that as their cover.

          • Spinner

            How about this -lets says Jahar killed your parents or your wife or your siblings or your kids. You will never see them again because they were killed for no reason. Now you see killer’s face with “soulful eyes” on cover of Rolling Stone which normally has rock stars and famous celebrities that people idolize on the cover. Honestly how would that make you feel?

          • Isabella Adamowicz

            You should have taken a gamble on Iraq? Intelligence of Germany, England and France agreed with the CIA assessment about WMD in Iraq. Saddam had only to let investigators in, he refused, the rest you saw on TV. One dictator less, good riddance.

          • Aaron

            We had no buisness to be in Iraq. and who are we to tell other countries they cant have WMD’s if we have them ourselves. Its pretty fucked up how you look at Iraq as a “gamble” we should have taken that costs thousands of lives.

          • Isabella Adamowicz

            They have attention span of a fly, no interest in what happened in September 11, Iraq- Kuwait war is ancient history, but conspiracy theories forever young andrelevant!

          • danielXY

            The Smartphones were just an example! Last week they made contracts about billions of Dollar to get their resources!

            Its People like you that make americans look really stupid.

            Especially To us europeans… Spinner is a german translation for a stupid guy 😀

          • Spinner

            It is good I don’t live in Germany. Spinner in America means I like to spin :)

  • GoSitinTheCar

    ..cool lasers….it would have been interesting if he pulled out a weapon eh?

  • ashley110

    There have been 12 people directly tied to this case that have resigned, been fired, resigned, jailed or even killed that were directly involved in the case, and have been released or resigned after the Marathon Bombings. here:

    Janet Napolitano- Head of DHS

    Robert Mueller – Head of FBI

    Richard DesLauriers – Head of Boston Field Office for both original Tsanaev FBI investigation, and Boston Marathon Bombings.

    Steve Abraria- Boston’s Head Fire Chief

    Thomas LaCroix – Waltham Police Department, original Triple Murder investigation head. (was arrested after the bombings for domestic assault, however is wife said in trial he never hit her, yea ok)

    Elizabeth A. Duke – Federal Reserve Governor (haven’t found anything to say she was involved just interesting )

    Thomas Menino – Mayor of Boston – Announced he will not seek re-election shortly after bombings.

    Gerald Walpin –

    Kirk D. Merricks Boston PD Officer – Found With Military Grade Explosives after bombings

    Gary Leone – Middlesex County district attorney, investigated Triple Murder.
    Ibragim Todashev – “Acquaintance” with Tsarnaev brothers Dead (he was shot by an agent 7 times and he was Unarmed)

    Stephen Shaw – FBI HRT Agent involved in the take down on boat, mysteriously ‘fell’ fast roping on a boat off Norfolk coast in a training exercise

    It’s so interesting that everybody here has declared this guy guilty when he hasn’t had even had his trial yet! if you are not thinking something fishy going on in this case, you not paying any attention!

    • MaggieJ

      12 out of how many hundreds of people?

    • Cindy Kilgore Yahna

      Excellent comment, Ashley, good for you!

    • runnerbp

      My pet hamster died too. When she told me how the FBI set up the Tsarnev brothers I didn’t believe her. But I know hamsters never lie. If only others had heard her story. But thankfully you are here for us. Thank you Ashley.

    • laura thomas

      There are 3 people dead and 264 that were injured. Many lost their limbs and some were permanently blinded.
      Bomber leaves a message inside the boat that says “muslims are one body” and “America sucks”.
      Maybe you are the one that needs to pay attention.

    • glennisw

      better hide under the bed, Ashley, before they come for you.

  • ashley110

    dzhokhar was unarmed in that boat, yet they kept shooting at it! he came out with 16 bullet wounds and a slit on his neck…

    • runnerbp

      They didn’t know he was unarmed.

    • We all know who the owners are

      Too bad he came out

    • We all know who the owners are

      I say elect him President. Or he should forever be in charge of crowd control for the Boston marathon because he knows how to thin a crowd and get it moving. You are a moron. Those are kind words and words for you to reflect on and change your life. Now don’t go ask the Government for help because your feelings were bruised on a public forum you posted to.

    • Isabella Adamowicz

      Good, terrorism doesn’t pay. How dare the police shoot at terrorist! First, they should have asked him if he was armed! LOL! And police should have believed him if he would have said “I’m not armed” LOL! Aha, and I have a bridge to sell you.Glad they did not took risks. Their lives are to precious for us. The only regret is that they have to defend such ingrates as you.

    • laura thomas

      They should have shot 17 bullets and call it a day.

      The only thing that they didn’t do was finish the job.

  • Truth Teller

    So what happens to the fan girls when the evidence comes out at trial and it is just plainly evident that he is guilty? Are you actually going to say we were wrong or are you going to continue insisting he was set up?

    • http://waterboarding.tk/ Claude Balloune

      Yes, but none of this answers the question of why my 17 year-old
      daughter (below) started wearing a burka, and will not eat her mother’s
      meatloaf anymore because it isn’t halal!
      Oh, wait! You mean she may have see this pic on RollingStone’s cover? OMG!

  • stj

    Regarding the fact that many people said that Tsarnaev’s photo was on the New York Times frequently and no one complained: The New York Times is a news journal. The cover of Rolling Stone is reserved for celebrities.
    Putting Tsarnaev’s portrait–he’s a good-looking young man–on the cover has given Tsarnaev *star quality*. Rolling Stone has glamourized him, and the editors knew when they printed the cover that it would be controversial.

    They want publicity for their rag, and they have been given it

    Also, I think the motivations of the police officer who released these pictures are pure bogus..The photos, with a Tsarnaev covered in blood draw even more sympathy for him. In my opinion he sold those photos for the money.

  • eric-jaybird-art.com

    Thank our God that we got them before they could breed. and then collect welfare. I hope we did…..

  • AustinObserver

    Patsy.

    • runnerbp

      Cline

  • Jack Nimble

    I’m outraged and offended at how the police photographer makes no reference to civilians save the families of the military / police. What about the civilians killed and maimed in the attack? The State Police of Mass. are so insulated, self-righteous, coddled and highly paid it’s absurd. Their only real product is handing out speeding tickets and protection-racketeering the public with unneeded, expensive police details on construction sites and elsewhere. Massachusetts would be far better off if they were disbanded once and for all. As for catching a once-in a generation terrorist, I’ll take my chances with the military, FBI and local police.

  • Osamas Pajamas

    I don’t always side with the cops — but I’d give the cop who provided these new photos a raise — and a case of real good beer. ~:<)

  • ohyan2912

    The facts are in the photos and NOT provided by the authorities.
    See storm clouds gathering on youtube. Do your research, think critically and know the big brother is watching all your moves.

    • runnerbp

      You mean the facts are in the photos of DT planting the bomb?

  • ashley110

    Rolling Stone Cover Proves Dumb Amerika!! the truth will set you free!

  • finabiscotti

    Tsarnaev, the Radical Muslim Terrorist – from the Boston Marathon bombing – is being glorified – on the cover of The Rolling Stone – because that is how Barack HUSSEIN Obama, a Radical, of Muslim faith, wants it.

    Just as his friend, Major Nidal Hasan acquired Special Treatment as the Fort Hood shooter –

    whose Radical Muslim Terrorist attack on a US Military base on US soil –

    as an ACT of WAR against The USA –

    was misclassified as just workplace violence.

    While on the No-Fly List, The Christmas Day bomber was enabled to enter The USA – w WMD – for his ACT of WAR against The USA – until an alert passenger foiled his attempt – in Detroit – only to receive Special Treatment from Obama – when Eric Holder as US AG intercepted the interrogation of the Christmas Day bomber, closing it down after only fifty minutes, silencing him – and acquiring an attorney at US Taxpayer expense!!!!!

    While on the No-Fly List, The Christmas Day bomber was enabled to enter The USA – w WMD – for his ACT of WAR against The USA – until an alert passenger foiled his attempt – in Detroit – only to receive Special Treatment from Obama when Eric Holder as US AG intercepted the interrogation of the Christmas Day bomber, closing it down after only fifty minutes, silencing him – and acquiring an attorney at US Taxpayer expense!!!!!

    Obama had Eric Holder as US AG acting more as defense counsel for these Radical Muslim Terrorists – other than performing the job as US AG in service to our country – as a PROSECUTOR for these ACTS of WAR against The USA.

    It came out in a congressional hearing into Obama’s Operation Fast and Furious gunrunning scandal = when arming Illegal Aliens and Narco-Terrorists = WHISTLEBLOWERS reported Holder and Obama were covering up the fact = weapons from their arms trafficking were found at the crime scenes of the cold-blooded murders of US Border Agent Brian Terry and ICE Agent Jamie Zapata – who were placed under Obama’s dangerous RULES of ENGAGEMENT to only use BEAN-BAG AMMUNITION when approaching people who have entered illegally who “might” be armed – when he was ARMING these Criminals – under the radar.

    Eric Holder was called out for never contacting these Families – to offer his condolences for Brian Terry, a former US Marine, who decided to continue serving his country as a US Border Agent – and was killed in the line of duty.

    It was stated “on-record” their deaths had occurred over One Year earlier -and no one from The White House or the Obama Administration called to any of them to offer their condolences. But that Obama, Holder and Hillary Clinton as US Secretary of State did not waste any time calling to the Family of Samir Khan – only hours after he was killed in a DRONE STRIKE in Yemen, w their target Anwar al-Walaki, the Radical Iman who counseled the 911 Hijackers, Fort Hood shooterS; Christmas Day bomber.

    Samir Khan was the Right Hand man and JIHADIST PROPOGANDIST for Anwar al-Walaki.

    NO EXCUSE should be acceptable for what occurred in BENGHAZI – when everyone knew – from the very beginning – it was a Radical Muslim terrorist attack = Americans were under siege abroad.

    These Americans were refused enhanced Security in a WAR ZONE on the Anniversary of 911 – for a WAR in Libya that Obama started – and made use of US Military action – w/o the knowledge or consent of our US Congress – or the American people.

    Why Benghazi-Gate = an anti-Islam video that caused a protest that turned VIOLENT as total Bullshyt – when it was only a matter of time that Susan Rice as Ambassador to the United Nations would be exposed for her FRAUD -while going so far as to “defend” Mohammed Morsi as President of Egypt – when information started coming out that this member of The Muslim Brotherhood was behind what occurred in Benghazi.

    Why would Obama go before the United Nations – and constantly repeat his outrageous LIE – anti-Islam video caused protest turned violent – while fully aware and refusing to acknowledge it was a Radical Muslim terrorist attack in Benghazi – that occurred on the Anniversary of 911?

    Is he that cold-blooded to give a STAND DOWN order – and make use of FOUR Americans as his collateral damage of appeasement – to Radical Islam?

    It is also CRIMES against HUMANITY – to allow Americans to be slaughtered in Benghazi – and Acts of TREASON to devise a Cover-up – for another one of his arms trafficking schemes – providing weapons to al-Qaeda = aiding and abetting the enemies of The USA.

    Is this why Obama has Eric Holder intimidating the survivors of Benghazi to remain silent?

    Hillary Clinton as US Secretary of State – at the Memorial of the four DEAD Americans from the Radical Muslim Terrorist attack in Benghazi, persisted in falsely portraying it was an anti-Islam video protest that turned Violent – saying this PROPOGANDA – over the COFFINS of the four Dead Americans!!!!

    What difference does it make now?

    Obama already labeled Tea Party attendees as Domestic Terrorists – demoralizing Americans showing their political dissent in civil demonstrations – and demonizing our returning American Troops as possible recruits for right-wing extremists.

    Obama came to power in a “coup” in 2008, manipulated the court system to not expose he had attended our American universities as a FOREIGN srudent – and had solicited money from State and Federal Govt in Grants – under False Pretenses – that was revealed doing the time of the numerous legal challenges to his “eligibility” – filed prior to the 2008 election.

    Obama was re-elected in a “coup” – in 2012 – when Eric Holder as US AG did NOTHING about the early morning complaints of the manipulation of voting machines – across the USA, registering votes for Obama – when votes were intended for Republican Mitt Romney.

    Why was a COURT ORDER required to re-instate SEVENTY-FIVE Republican Election Officials, Poll Workers, Poll Watchers – who were either physically removed and/or prevented from entering the polling stations in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania? This IS the manipulation of the 2012 presidential election = overt VOTE RIGGING schemes – to have Obama w 108% of the votes, his Republican opponent receiving Zero votes – in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

    Now Obama and Holder are manipulating the American Justice system – on behalf of Radical Muslims in their Acts of War against The USA = an element of WARFARE for Radical Islam = LAWFARE!!!!

    • Doc

      Call your doctor; you need to get your medication adjusted.

    • glennisw

      Take your meds and go get some rest. And keep off the street.

  • GlobalWorldNewsGuru

    So only u and your kind are allowed public opinion protection but anyone pro Muslim or pro wrongfully held and anti Apartheid does not have freedom of Press-say it only your kind has freedom of press and then tell us what your kind is?

    • runnerbp

      You are free to comment here. Some people are angry about these boys actions. It sounds like you’re angry too. How do two sides that are angry have a discussion without mindlessly blaming each other? You start.

    • CorrectionPlease

      That a mighty wide swath of outrage and indignation there Global.

      But you’ve forget to mention racism and war, evil Wall Street, slavery, white colonialists, US war mongering, etc . . .

      And I’ll bet you are for puppies and flowers and . . . we know you are for freedom of the press . . . does that include infidels too? . . . is it okay to lie to infidels? kill them?

      . . . May Allah Grant You Peace

  • Tangair

    Jann Wenner would publish autopsy photos of his mother if they would drive sales.

  • trademein

    so, i thought he couldnt speak because of a throat wound? His throat looked fine in the pics.

    • ashley110

      it happened after he got out and he was UNarmed! police were the only ones shooting at him!

      • runnerbp

        Imagine shooting at the poor bomber who they thought might have bombs or guns. Poor boy…. the one the Tsarnev murdered I mean.

      • Isabella Adamowicz

        Yes, how dare police shoot at terrorist! First, they should have asked him if he was armed! LOL! And of course police should have believed him if he would have said “I’m not armed” LOL! And taking risks? Aha, and I have a bridge to sell you. Good on them for not taking risks, their lives are too precious!

        • ashley110

          first they said he tried to commit suicide but they later confirmed he was UNarmed! i don’t even wanna argue with you! people are so close minded here!

          • Isabella Adamowicz

            Because you can’t refute my argument about police not knowing if he was armed or not. They acted according of the rules of engagement that specify ,not to take risks with their lives. What are you complaining about? They did not shoot him dead, they let him get out of the boat and then they arrested him. Well done.

          • ashley110
          • Neil

            That rt news show is so mickey mouse. Its not even news just another fluff opinion piece. WHY HASNT FBI SHOWN ME EVIDENCE?! I don’t know maybe because they don’t have to? You are such an entitled twatface.

          • Neil

            I’ve read you write “he was unarmed” in replies at least 15 times now but of course those who don’t see things your way are closed minded. FYI he was unarmed because he ran out of bullets. That really doesn’t change absolutely anything. He should consider himself lucky to be alive given the circumstances.

    • MaggieJ

      Of course, you know you cannot see his whole throat in these pictures but check out the one of the paramedic pressing a gauze pad against his throat. It sure looks like a throat wound.

  • Olga Lev

    good answer for the assholes from R.S! Thank you Sgt. Sean Murphy! Thank you Boston Police!

  • Rob Porter

    My objection, Mr, Kraus, is because it is wrong. Simply wrong. Doesn’t need explaining. Wrong is a term libs don’t understand. There is always equivocation, moral relativism, “we need understand where they are coming from”, it’s art! Always excuses for bad behavior and for evil deeds.

  • Laurie Wiegler

    Unfortunately, these real images have nothing to do with the picture Tsarnaev took of himself. He looks like one would expect him to have looked after being wounded and lying bloody in a boat for hours. I would have not shown these photos if only for the fact that it just draws more attention to the killer. This will do nothing to deter those who support the handsome killer. Many killers have been handsome. Perhaps we need a larger conversation about not looking at one’s superficial self and analyzing character and behavior.

  • New America

    When this sub human piece filth was escorted to court last week there were actual people cheering for him. Then I remembered the city is the People’s Republic of Boston, the bastion of liberalism. Liberalism is truly a mental disorder.

    John Galt Take Me With You . com

    • juststacey

      Hey asshat,

      Most of us here in Boston think he’s guilty and are glad that he’s been tried on the Federal level so he’ll get the death penalty. Don’t lump us all together with a small but vocal and incredibly ignorant minority. Oh and btw, I’m LIBERAL!

  • ashley110

    Rolling Stone Bomber Cover: Media Misses the Point! well isn’t this true

  • Buypass

    I prefer to see murderous scum dead in a pool of their own blood.

  • Bob White

    Small wonder he is a pop culture hero. After all , we elected an America Hater twice in a row. No surprise to me at all, just sad.

  • bc1978

    This is actually entertaining. Some of you are so simple in your world views. You’ve never been in the position to make judgements about someone based on information available at hand and had to decide whether they needed to be killed, or detained, or searched, or let walk by. This kid is nothing more than another dirtbag radical jihadist. Some of you continue to glorify him, and some of you get i

  • http://www.axj.com AXJ ®

    We at Actions For Justice ( AXJ ) run the biggest group on Facebook with over 20,000 members and 200,000 members world wide, and we are still waiting to see all the evidence which proves beyond a shadow of a doubt these brothers manufactured, transported, placed and donated these weapons of mass destruction. What was the reason for 3 towers going down on 9/11 and attacking Iraq? The same weapons of mass destruction too? We are not conspiracy theorists, just normal people that know something is not right in this case. The bombs had been previously placed. Jahar never got further east on Bolyston Street than 755 at the Forum Restaurant. The only DNA found was female. He was only 5’9″ when searched for and no Russian accent, but now it turns out he is in reality 6’2″ and a thick Russian accent? How do you explain all this? We have yet to see any real evidence. All hearsay and that will not convict anyone. The Romans said 2,000 years ago “In Dubio Pro Reo” and it stands today and that is why Zimmerman walked a free man. Stop trying to convince us Oswald shot JFK. We at AXJ all know the truth. Google us.

  • ashley110

    you all watch this! this is the truth! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IwSRB3X1aU8

  • bc1978

    AXJ? Are you a joke? You’re not conspiracy theorists? Come on… The third tower fell on 9/11 because two 100+ story towers collapsed right next to it. You guys should hire a civil engineer on your staff. But what brings up 9/11 anyway? Thought we were just talking about this one radical islamist terrorist? The more I read the more I realize this is just an outlet for people to try so hard to sound so intellectually superior with dissertations using big words to explain simple concepts.

  • Robert Blohm

    Hmmm – the killer is a human being, as we all are, and to think otherwise is to “argue for a narrow view of journalism and journalistic priorities.” I will be waiting then for the article on the human being named George Zimmerman, perhaps also done in a sympathetic vein, especially since that human being was found not guilty by reason of self-defense. I think that’s a great idea for a Rolling Stone article. I sure will be waiting. . ..

  • Dave R

    Where’s the throat wound ? LIARS!

    • ashley110
      • MaggieJ

        Why do you care what Abby Martin thinks? Can’t you think for yourself?

        • ashley110

          i think for my self! you don’t even listen to me so watch that…

          • MaggieJ

            So, you think for yourself but don’t listen to yourself. Gee, that sounds stable. lol

      • Chumscrubber

        Ignore the tag-teaming trolls ashley110. Great video!

      • ME-B

        exactly what I’ve been saying. people talk about a video of them dropping their backpacks. OK, let’s see the video! And the kid in Florida? What’s up with that. I’m with this woman–not assigning innocence here, but there are way more questions than answers about this

  • BoogPOwell

    With apologies to “Dr. Hook” and Shel Silverstien…
    “Well, we hit Ellis Island to seek asylum from a really oppressive regime,
    And we assimilated into this western culture, that most Muslims consider obscene,
    We made lots of friends but in the end
    Our parents left to go back home;
    So we built some bombs, for the marathon,
    and now I’m on the cover of the Rolling Stone”…..
    So, just how little common sense lives within the elitist journalists, editors and the publisher of the Stone? It clearly has to be “zip” to NOT know that they so egregiously erred by placing Tsarnaev’s photo on the cover and suggesting that it was all due to a “broken childhood”. What a group of dolts and rubes. What an insult to the many killed and maimed by the two brothers and their soup pots of hatred. For shame.
    And folks think it “high journalism”, they are as blind as bats and equally repulsive.

  • 紫暮龍誉

    I have to agree the cover of the Boston Bomber on Rolling Stones Magazine is a disgrace.

    They should put out a new issue with the cover photo of the women and children killed by US Drones, show the world the REAL FACE of TERRORISM … The United States of America.

    Karma, what goes around comes around. You kill citizens in other countries, then expect the same in your country .. it is not rocket science.

    PS : Do not supper terrorism in any form Government, Religious or Private, people have the right to live in peace without someone dropping WMD from a Government Drone on their homes or setting off IEDs by a islamic nutjob in the streets. The US government and religious nutjobs are as bad as one another!

    The rest of us are tired of both groups.

    • runnerbp

      So how would you solve the myriad conflicts that are under way at this time? How would you help create a situation where the Afghan leadership can succeed? How do you feel about the Taliban shooting little girls for going to school? The US has a long and storied history of causing harm by playing some geopolitical games. Yes . What would you do in Afghanistan for instance? Many people want us there for stability. Who would you trust? Why? Doing nothing has consequences too.

      • Nicholas

        Both Iraq and Afghan were fine until the US decided to go in and now both are sh☆tholes more then ever, and now the US is looking at interfering in Syria, talk about stupid.

        The amount of violence happening in Iraq is a directed result of the US and its illegal war that outed the President SH. So what if he is killing his own citizens, his country, his rule, nothing to do with the US or any one else, but NOPE the US having to be the police of the globe, makes up some cock&bull about WMD and bombs the place to bits and now look, no law and order and 100’s are dying a day, a lot more have been killed since the invasion then under SH rule… Great Job USA .. Morons!

        Remember it was RR in 1983 that said ‘”These gentlemen are the moral equivalent of the founding fathers.” talking about the Taliban. How true it that I really do not know, but the photo of RR sitting down with them speaks volumes.

        The US government interfered in Afghan because the soviets were there, trained the now Taliban in Terrorism to take out the soviets, once the soviets pulled out so to the money flow to the Taliban from the US government and the training, Once again using others to do your dirty work. Then when the Taliban refused to hand over OBL, the US bombed the place turning it in to bigger hell hole then it already was.

        The Taliban stopped the Poppy cultivation and since the US went in and screw the place up the Poppy cultivation has skyrocketed. How many are going to die around the world because of the Heroin coming out of Afghanistan?? .. Once again great job USA.

        What next the DEA going to start doing cover operation in Afghanistan like in South America?

        As for your comment “Many people want us there for stability.” If I was your grade teacher you would get a big fat ‘F’ for that one. No stability what so ever in Afghanistan and you have been there long enough now.

        How to fix up the mess that the US has created in Afghanistan is anyones idea, there is no clear way of fixing it, you have divided the county that only a all out civil war will fix and trust me once NATO is out of Afghanistan all out civil war will start and the winner will take all, whether the US likes them or not. It is happening in Iraq between peace loving muslims and it will happen in Afghanistan also.

        What I do find completely funny was the reactions of the Boston public to the bombings, all in shock and asking why did terrorism come to Boston, all I can say is ‘Call it Karma as Boston was one of the major American centres which supported the IRA with money and weapons to kill BRITISH civilians and soldiers over a period of 30 years’

        Do not know how many Yanks read the news stories in the UK after the Boston Bombings, but most of the comment from the British was that Boston got was it deserved after supporting the IRA and their terrorist campaign against the British over 3 decades.

        Quote “One of the first world statesmen to send a message of sympathy to Boston after last week’s outrage was Gerry Adams, president of Sinn Fein. ‘Just watching news of the explosion in Boston,’ he tweeted, ‘Sympathy with people of that fine city.’ Mr Adams has every reason to think fondly of Boston. Throughout the troubles, while he sat on the IRA war council, Boston was one of the major American centres which he (through Noraid) could rely on for support and funding. Bostonian money would have been used to help pay for the IRA attack on Margaret Thatcher’s democratically elected government in Brighton, the grotesque Birmingham pub bombings that left 21 dead, and of course the Lisburn van bombing of 15 June 1988. On that terrible occasion six off-duty British soldiers were killed by an IRA bomb just after they had completed a half-marathon for charity.”

        Mmmm interesting.

        The USA’s so called ‘WAR ON TERROR’ and making the world a safer place is nothing but a con. Since the invasion of Afghanistan the world has not became any safer in fact it has become more dangerous, and terrorism by both the US government and religious nut jobs have increased, not decreased as the WoT is meant to be doing.

        The US want to end terrorism around the world, then first it needs to stop supporting and carrying it out on others.

        I would love to enjoy traveling the globe seeing other countries without the fear of being blown to bits by a US Drone dropping a WMD on my head or some religious fruit-loop blowing himself up in a market place.

  • runnerbp

    It’s fascinating how conspiracy theorists minds work. There is video showing the Tsarnev bros. carrying backpacks that are identical to those used in the bombing. They are walking together. It’s on YouTube and easy to find. Later in the day they are chased by police after carjacking a car and threw bombs and shot at the police. There are many eye witnesses. Their homes had the same materials used in the bombings. But conspiracy theorists look for one bit her or one bit there and focus on a bit that is completely unnecessary to showing these guys did this bombing. The bit they imagine is being withheld becomes a CONSPIRACY. They simply know there is a video showing a specific event such as little Tsarnev dropping the backpack at a bomb site. If that video is not revealed all the other information evaporates. Fascinating.

    • Ron Wordwelder

      Since at least two people are are alleged to have carried out the bombing, it is a conspiracy theory. “identical to those used in the bombing” – where does that information come from, Tsarnaev conspiracy theorists? If only the FBI would release that “chilling” video of the alleged perps planting the bombs, it would save a lot of argument.

  • Former Wheeler Resident

    The Boston bombing was planned months in advance, if not years… by the former head of Boston EMS, now the Head of FEMA, I believe he was appointed by Obama. Watch and get the facts… pictures are worth a thousand words my friends… http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tWxLD01oWHM

  • Ron Wordwelder

    Any new pics of the naked Tamerlan lookalike? Or Ibragim Todashev? How about a still from Deval Patrick’s “chilling” video?

  • Liz@NOLA

    My best take on the Rolling Stone cover along with its headline is that it gives each of us the opportunity to realize that our physical attributes do not define us as humans. Our actions do that. Too often that fact is lost upon our conscience mind while we assign positive personal attitudes to positive personal appearance. It is a shame that the Rolling Stone article could not include the best picture from the above series – that of the accused terrorist slumped in the boat, bloodied and bowed, giving up to authority. That would have completed the sequence of events depicted and discussed in the article. I do not find any “glamour” in the story of a boy who was given every chance for a quality life and threw that away to become a terrorist who maimed and murdered hundreds of innocent people. It is worth our lives to understand the dichotomy of the situation and how difficult it is to recognize when these changes take place in ourselves or in others and to deal with the consequences preferably before we destroy others.

  • DMck

    We live in times where news is effectively packaged and delivered to shape public opinion rather than to inform us of the facts. We are not asked to think, but to react. Thank you Officer Sean Murphy for breaking the mold and providing another view – not the cleaned-up view, but the gritty side. All sides should be delivered and not censored. Rolling Stone kicked the can, but there are many boots. Again, thanks Sean.

  • Karma’s Secrets

    After the 911 inside job, nothing US says I believe. See for your self what happened in Boston.

    http://imgur.com/a/Nx8EU

  • Hillary Klntohn

    They may as well of put a cropped photo of the famous Wiener twitter image on the Stoner cover …because from a distance with my one bad eye …..the kid looks like a small din*

  • Mary

    Rolling Stone should not have glamorized Tsarnaev. I have no problem with these photos coming to light.

  • JohnS

    It’s the same goddamnfucking photo that the news media showed 24/7 for weeks after the bombing… but somehow this one magazine using the same photo is worthy of scorn? Right… You want to know why terrorists hate us… because we’re nucking futs.

  • Jimmy

    Does no one remember that this kid was shot through the neck and in “critical condition?” How is he standing?

  • agglebert

    to those of you here who think you will ever convince 95% of amerikans that these two guys are patsies you are wasting your time! fear not your gov’t, fear the 95% who DON’T get it and will gladly turn you in for having an opinion or affiliation on/with anything listed by heimatland insecurity as evidence of being an enemy of the state (dissident).

  • Sally Turnip

    This entire Boston Bombing was a clusterphuk from the beginning. CRAFT was in the area (and on the finish line after the bombing), bomb sniffing dogs and swat teams, yet the Boston Police deny any of it every existed. The REAL TRAVESTY of this entire situation was watching the cops MARCH PEOPLE OUT OF THEIR OWN HOMES AT GUNPOINT! Only in Libtard Central, Boston Ma. Try kicking down doors and forcibly extracting people from their own homes down South. You’d get a skull full of lead and rightfully so. This was just a test for Martial law. Someone was behind all of this and it wasn’t a couple of kids from the other side of the world. 100 cops get outsmarted by two Russian kids and run them all over Boston
    like the Keystone cops? They grab them AND THEN they escape? If people weren’t injured, this could be a sequel to a Blues Brothers movie. The Government had a motive and we’ll probably never know what it was, but this whole thing stinks.

  • Rockenroller

    Rolling stone is a sick fffnnn mag, NEVER WILL I EVER SUPPORT SCUMBAG TRASHY MAG LIKE THAT EVER AGAIN!

  • ts123

    All you conspiracy theorists on here are totally nuts. I’m betting you are not even in the US but are part of the Muslim Brotherhood or some other terrorist organization. Well, we know your brothers were terrorists and they got what they deserved.

    • Rockenroller

      Right on!!! No one ever said psychopaths were dumb. Its too bad these radical extremists cannot be relegated back to the desert where they can kill one another, and where no thoughtful human being would ever care

  • disqus_IKUTgVoeDj

    Alright, first off, so many of you are sheep that believe the media without evidence. All the media/government did was say this person did said action without showing any proof. I’ve done extensive researched, analyzed hours of video, and hundreds of images, and found nothing that legitimately links either brother to this.

    The way I see it, the government needed someone to blame. They knew of the Tsarnaev brothers and decided they’re most likely to fit the profile of people who would do this. Usually “terrorists” are said to be foreigners who “hate the US”, and these brothers were in fact foreigners. So to me, the media, government, and people figured these are the perfect people to accuse of a crime. Problem is, there’s no evidence that I have seen linking them. In fact, from what I understand, they like the USA.

    I’m not exactly sure why people are accusing someone who HAS NOT had a trial, and who HAS NOT been proven guilty of such crimes. He is just a suspect right now. You’re all about “the amendments”, ” The constitution” “I want my rights”.. Interestingly enough, Dzhokhar is in fact human. He should get his rights too as stated by YOUR Constitution. The same one YOU get YOUR rights from.

    I don’t get how people can be so blind to all of this. The stories have changed, and are still changing numerous times. A lot of it doesn’t add up. People need to stop being so brainwashed by the media and use some common sense, and logic.

    You also claim “he admitted to it.” Show me some evidence of this. Sure, the media told you he did it, but you haven’t seen it. So why believe it? I guess Fox News and CNN are right.I guess anything the media tells you is correct? Let me give you a tip; don’t believe the media. They have been exposed before, as has YOUR Government. That’s why we need whistleblowers to make you “sheep” realize what’s really happening.

    Another point. From what I’ve seen, when a “terrorist” does an action to injure/kill people, they don’t hide it. They want the world to know. Terrorists want people to know of their actions.. That’s part of their satisfaction. They accept death that comes with it. They accept punishment. They don’t care. They admit it. So logically, if Dzhokhar had done this, he wouldn’t have allowed himself to live. He’d have either let the officers kill him, or he’d have killed himself to go down for his country (Russia) as most terrorists do. He wouldn’t have said not guilty. He’d have arrogantly admitted to doing it.

    I can go on and on about this, but I won’t. You people need to wake up, and stop accusing people until you know for a fact that they did it. At this point you all know nothing. You’re all blaming someone who could potentially be innocent.

    • rjm2238

      You remind me of the old Monty Python sketch, the one about the Dinsdale Brothers. It had a gangster denying; completely and vigorously, any complicity on the part of the Dinsdale Brothers in a kidnapping until the announcer states, “we actually have film of them doing that” at which point the gangster matter of factly admits, “Oh yes, they did that”!

      Thanks, your post gave me a pleasant memory of that routine and by way of comparison; they are both hilarious.

      Rich in New Mexico.

    • MaggieJ

      The trial is where their guilt will be proven, or not. Just because you, personally, have not seen all the evidence sure doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist.

  • mickrussom

    Tsarnaev should be put into gen pop. That rat vermin scum. And the liberal scum in charge of Massachusetts and the USSA are traitor scum as well.

    • chankermechanicFMF2nd

      The Muslims in the gen. pop. in prison would greet him as a hero. Keep him in solitary with no social intercourse and let it drive him as mad as a hatter. That’s the least he deserves.

  • Victor

    Shame on you American Citizens… for allowing your police to march in there.

    Oh, is it ok for them to march because of a ‘terrorist’? Remind us of that when you are on the list.

    • chankermechanicFMF2nd

      Would you rather play paddy cake with the little killer?
      You’re so brave why don’t you join the force and eventually show them how it’s done.

  • AZsparrow

    All I can say is the treatment so far of Sgt. Sean Murphy seems like over-kill to me. What.. were they national security secrets or something? Why were they kept hidden from the public anyway? Good grief. So, slap Sgt. Murphy’s hand for not asking first, and let him get back to work protecting the citizens of his State.

  • trynfindit

    The police officer who “leaked” the pictures should be PRAISED not punished.
    It’s the head of the police department who should be punished for holding back those pictures.

  • New America

    God Bless you Sgt. Sean Murphy!

    When this sub human piece filth was escorted to court last week there were actual people cheering for him. Then I remembered the city is the People’s Republic of Boston, the bastion of liberalism. Liberalism is truly a mental disorder.

    John Galt Take Me With You . com

    • chankermechanicFMF2nd

      People cheering?
      What a sick society the libs have created.

      • HerrinSchadenfreude

        Amazing. That this late in the game, your need to find some way whether real or imagined, to be considered superior to other Americans and to have a “they” to point fingers at while you yourself feign innocence is absolute top priority. A medal to wear on your shirt.

        You and your philosophy are not part of the solution Sir. You’re each part of the problem. And the fact that you will likely be buried with such ignorance is both good and bad news depending on how soon it happens and what you make “dumber” while we wait.

        No, I’m not a “lib”. I read history books. I don’t “join” or “subscribe to”. I make up my own mind, hold my own opinion, and learned long ago that where “liberal” and “conservative” are concerned, there is no “all” of anything for anyone and most vary depending on who gains and who loses.

        And bipartisanship is in those history books too. Where it died around 1890 something. It’s been a trick ever since. Update your records.

  • SCAQTony

    I think these photos glamorized this terrorist more than the Rolling Stone cover photo – Look at all the resources they poured into catching him. My God, they make this guy look like they are hunting “Godzilla.”

  • Lisa Solt Davis

    While journalist and editors are protected by the First Amendment, do you fell they should have a code of ethics that should be followed. Just because your allowed to do something doesn’t mean you should.

  • Numenius

    The biggest threat to the freedoms and rights of Americans are the politicians and lawmakers and their hired muscle (people in uniform… military and cops).

    I couldnt care less whose photo shows up on any magazine cover, but the fact that this soldier in the US Government’s War Against Americans is a little insulted gets no sympathy from me.

  • Hillary Klntohn

    Is holder gonna file hate crime charges against him ?

    Pick on holders young lover from Chechnya….and who the hell knows ?
    I mean ..who made his photo available online ?

    ….. a female finked him out….is my 20 dollar bet online …

  • L.P. Boegle

    I say “Bullshit”, I am supposed to be a lady and not use such “Vulgarity”, officer didn’t play by the rules?

    Whose rules?

    Do terrorists play by rules and wasn’t that about as vulgar an attack against innocent “AMERICANS”, why the hell were those guys still in the states anyway?

    Yeah you bet, open the borders and let them all in, that will finalize the demise of our wonderful freedom, which we don’t have since the takeover of the Obama regime!

    Another reason to never give up your freedom to bears arms,with Monsanto, food is poisoned, no food means weakness, no guns, means we can’t fight for what we need

    PROTECT YOUR RIGHTS, MY RIGHTS AND EVERY OTHER CITIZENS THAT CAN’T DO SO FOR THEMSELVES.

    NO MORE MESSING WITH OUR “CONSTITUTION” !

  • Robert

    Sgt. Murphy Shoots Nikon.

  • oahumike

    Where is the supposed throat wound he sustained that kept him from talking? I thought he got shot through the throat.

    • Jim Bunion

      He did not do it, they made sure he would not talk.

      • http://www.opaobie.com/promisekept.php TEWS_Pilot

        If they had wanted to silence him, the sniper could have pulled the trigger when he had the laser on his forehead. Why are you trying to impugn the Boston Police?

    • John Q. Public

      Look at the second to last photo – there is a pressure bandage being applied to the left side of his throat right below the ambu bag over his mouth. I would suspect that this is the throat wound the were referring to.

      • oahumike

        What about the other photos? A gun shot through the throat (as claimed in the original narrative) would produce a massive amount of blood, which is not present. In the second to last photo nothing is visible at all.

        • John Q. Public

          That arresting SWAT team was interviewed by Anderson Cooper like the first week of May and described it as a knife wound. You can find video of that interview by googling it. As far as I’m aware (and I haven’t tried to read every bit of reporting on this – far from it) officials were tight lipped about the source of the injury until that SWAT interview and all the reporting about it was from anonynmous sources. The SWAT interview was the first one that seemed to truly disclose the nature of the injury. The fourth to last photos seems to show a lot of blood, but its hard to tell the source and that area of his neck is fully shadowed. If you look at the headline photo at the top of the story his hands are covered in blood as is his sweatshirt. I can’t tell you that every wound bleeds profusely or doesn’t bleed profusely – all I can do is point out the photograph that looks like they were tending to an injury to the left side of his throat which would seem to corroborate that he had a throat injury of some sort.

  • Spinner

    The cover can have many meanings. It can be creepy and weird showing regular guy next door but it can also glamourize especially on magazine cover that consistently shows celebrities and rock stars that people idolize. It does not have to be one or the other. The problem is Rolling Stone was blinded by their goal to be edgy and different that they didn’t think about about how it can look glamorous. If they had thought more about the victims who lost the most from this then they would have done the responsible thing and changed the cover or photoshoped it and made it less like Jim Morrison, Dylan, teen beat. It was failure of their arrogant editors and art directors who should have known better. Let me put it this way – if they had put a young good looking White Supremacist on cover of Rolling Stone and and he happens to look like Jim Morrison, Dylan and saying how its a good kid turned monster, I am 100% sure someone would be FIRED.

  • http://www.opaobie.com/promisekept.php TEWS_Pilot

    Well, if they want a couple of photos to start a national conversation, may I suggest these?

    Where are these “Rallies for Justice” going to be held?

  • Jim Bunion

    He is a suspect, not the Bomber, he said he did not do it. Was he involved with others, YES.

    • http://www.opaobie.com/promisekept.php TEWS_Pilot

      Right, and Teddy Kennedy just drove the car, he didn’t actually KILL Mary Jo Kopechne.

  • ashley110

    you all need to watch this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IwSRB3X1aU8

  • Sorceress

    This has everything to do with Rolling Stone. Since its inception the magazine has honored those it sees as rebels and even revolutionaries. Without thought for the consequences of its actions the editors invariably glamorize those who should not be given the time of day. Ostensibly, Rolling Stone is a music magazine, but its editors seem to think that it is just too hip for the straights out there who can’t understand such hipness. Sorry, guys. I’ve watched this magazine since it started. RS was always encouraging those interviewed to use gutter language (which RS happily printed) and to tell of their various drug or violence related activities offstage for the amusement of their fans. Having begun to be a parody of itself over the years, I guess they tried for “edginess” with this cover. Bad choice. Whether all humans are capable of this level of evil or not is hardly the issue. The issue is that RS made a bad choice.

    • bit_torrent

      eff R.S.!

  • ~R~C~

    Hooray for the cop that took and posted these pictures! Terrorism SHOULD NOT BE HONORED!

  • Andrew Arnold

    Sean Murphy is a hero. Edward Snowden is a coward. Here’s why- Murphy saw a wrong that needed to be made right. He did the right thing and then stood his ground and faced the consequences like a man. Snowden saw a wrong that needed to be made right. He did the right thing and then sneaked off in the night like a rat to a foreign power in order to escape the consequences. End of story.

    • Numenius

      A matter of perspective, I guess. The way I see it, Snowden was smart, knew the consequences and planned accordingly. Murphy is an idiot with a hero-complex.

      • Isabella Adamowicz

        So somebody who cold- heartedly betrays, and runs, is smart, the other does what he thinks is right, stays to face the consequences , while sacrificing his career, and he is an idiot. Great values America!

        • Numenius

          That, my dear, would be a straw man. Youve mischaracterized both, leading to a rediculous conclusion.

          Thanks for playing.

  • KC

    Study: Conspiracy theorists’ sane; government dupes crazy, hostile
    Recent studies by psychologists and social scientists in the US and UK suggest that contrary to mainstream media stereotypes, those labeled “conspiracy theorists” appear to be saner than those who accept the official versions of contested events.

    The most recent study was published on July 8th by psychologists Michael J. Wood and Karen M. Douglas of the University of Kent (UK). Entitled “What about Building 7? A social psychological study of online discussion of 9/11 conspiracy theories,” the study compared “conspiracist” (pro-conspiracy theory) and “conventionalist” (anti-conspiracy) comments at news websites.

    The authors were surprised to discover that it is now more conventional to leave so-called conspiracist comments than conventionalist ones: “Of the 2174 comments collected, 1459 were coded as conspiracist and 715 as conventionalist.” In other words, among people who comment on news articles, those who disbelieve government accounts of such events as 9/11 and the JFK assassination outnumber believers by more than two to one. That means it is the pro-conspiracy commenters who are expressing what is now the conventional wisdom, while the anti-conspiracy commenters are becoming a small, beleaguered minority.

    Perhaps because their supposedly mainstream views no longer represent the majority, the anti-conspiracy commenters often displayed anger and hostility: “The research… showed that people who favored the official account of 9/11 were generally more hostile when trying to persuade their rivals.”

    Additionally, it turned out that the anti-conspiracy people were not only hostile, but fanatically attached to their own conspiracy theories as well. According to them, their own theory of 9/11 – a conspiracy theory holding that 19 Arabs, none of whom could fly planes with any proficiency, pulled off the crime of the century under the direction of a guy on dialysis in a cave in Afghanistan – was indisputably true. The so-called conspiracists, on the other hand, did not pretend to have a theory that completely explained the events of 9/11: “For people who think 9/11 was a government conspiracy, the focus is not on promoting a specific rival theory, but in trying to debunk the official account.”

    In short, the new study by Wood and Douglas suggests that the negative stereotype of the conspiracy theorist – a hostile fanatic wedded to the truth of his own fringe theory – accurately describes the people who defend the official account of 9/11, not those who dispute it.

    Additionally, the study found that so-called conspiracists discuss historical context (such as viewing the JFK assassination as a precedent for 9/11) more than anti-conspiracists. It also found that the so-called conspiracists to not like to be called “conspiracists” or “conspiracy theorists.”

    Both of these findings are amplified in the new book Conspiracy Theory in America by political scientist Lance deHaven-Smith, published earlier this year by the University of Texas Press. Professor deHaven-Smith explains why people don’t like being called “conspiracy theorists”: The term was invented and put into wide circulation by the CIA to smear and defame people questioning the JFK assassination! “The CIA’s campaign to popularize the term ‘conspiracy theory’ and make conspiracy belief a target of ridicule and hostility must be credited, unfortunately, with being one of the most successful propaganda initiatives of all time.”

    In other words, people who use the terms “conspiracy theory” and “conspiracy theorist” as an insult are doing so as the result of a well-documented, undisputed, historically-real conspiracy by the CIA to cover up the JFK assassination. That campaign, by the way, was completely illegal, and the CIA officers involved were criminals; the CIA is barred from all domestic activities, yet routinely breaks the law to conduct domestic operations ranging from propaganda to assassinations.

    DeHaven-Smith also explains why those who doubt official explanations of high crimes are eager to discuss historical context. He points out that a very large number of conspiracy claims have turned out to be true, and that there appear to be strong relationships between many as-yet-unsolved “state crimes against democracy.” An obvious example is the link between the JFK and RFK assassinations, which both paved the way for presidencies that continued the Vietnam War. According to DeHaven-Smith, we should always discuss the “Kennedy assassinations” in the plural, because the two killings appear to have been aspects of the same larger crime.

    Psychologist Laurie Manwell of the University of Guelph agrees that the CIA-designed “conspiracy theory” label impedes cognitive function. She points out, in an article published in American Behavioral Scientist (2010), that anti-conspiracy people are unable to think clearly about such apparent state crimes against democracy as 9/11 due to their inability to process information that conflicts with pre-existing belief.

    In the same issue of ABS, University of Buffalo professor Steven Hoffman adds that anti-conspiracy people are typically prey to strong “confirmation bias” – that is, they seek out information that confirms their pre-existing beliefs, while using irrational mechanisms (such as the “conspiracy theory” label) to avoid conflicting information.

    The extreme irrationality of those who attack “conspiracy theories” has been ably exposed by Communications professors Ginna Husting and Martin Orr of Boise State University. In a 2007 peer-reviewed article entitled “Dangerous Machinery: ‘Conspiracy Theorist’ as a Transpersonal Strategy of Exclusion,” they wrote:

    “If I call you a conspiracy theorist, it matters little whether you have actually claimed that a conspiracy exists or whether you have simply raised an issue that I would rather avoid… By labeling you, I strategically exclude you from the sphere where public speech, debate, and conflict occur.”

    But now, thanks to the internet, people who doubt official stories are no longer excluded from public conversation; the CIA’s 44-year-old campaign to stifle debate using the “conspiracy theory” smear is nearly worn-out. In academic studies, as in comments on news articles, pro-conspiracy voices are now more numerous – and more rational – than anti-conspiracy ones.

    No wonder the anti-conspiracy people are sounding more and more like a bunch of hostile, paranoid cranks.

    • JonaD

      I just say ‘no’ in general to your hypothesis of conspiracy theories finally winning against non-conspiracy theories… and I didn’t even read past the first few paragraphs of your treatise. THIS makes my point here.. that non-conspiracy people are simply tired of wading through the long windy tangled crazy rantings of conspiracy folk, and so have fallen off from bothering to try and piece together some level of sanity in them.

      THIS does not prove that surviving inane rantings, still being thrown and argued by you guys are more durable, or make stronger points, and so are more true… NO, it just means that the non-conspiracy people, are pushing you guys to the side and smirking while rolling their/our eyes more. Consider that.

      • KC

        If you didn’t even bother to read my post, or look at the facts from the study. Then your post is 100% irreverent and opinionated. The truth is that 80% of the people now don’t believe the official 911 story….and growing….you and your one sided ”believe everything from the gov” …deniers are a minority now, and nobody even cares about what you say anymore…you are what we call a ”shill”….or gov soc-puppet…..good luck with that!…..peace!

        • JonaD

          No… I read at least 30% of your insane ranting, and so am significantly undermining your 100% confidence in it. And by the way… your saying 80% of the people believe one thing or another is utterly inane!, since 86-92% of the people also believe in supernatural phenomena with no basis in reality at all.

          • KC

            The wolves lose no sleep, over the opinions of the sheep.

          • JonaD

            Oh, I wouldn’t be so cavalier as to admit you’re a preditor.

  • vince

    where is the throat wound he has now??i thought they said he tried to
    kill himself by putting a gun to his throat.I saw video of him with a
    hole or cut on his throat after the police arrested him,they said he
    did that to himself before he got out of the boat.

    • ashley110

      they first he tried to commit suicide and later they confirmed he was UNARMED, they were the only ones shooting at him and watch this http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IwSRB3X1aU8

    • gkshenaut

      Look at the next-to-last picture. The medic is holding a pad against a neck wound.

  • vince

    there is video of him with a throat wound and cops working on him

  • Chumscrubber

    Enjoy . . .

  • Terry Johnson

    Show the “happy terrorist” Fine. Be Fair though. show also the footage of those child murderers placing the pressure cooker bomb under the childs seat at the bleacher, and the lifeless and limbless RIGHT ON THE COVER. Issue burned, subscription cancelled. And I did read it, and DAM. And now as we leave music and enter terrorist politics, the WORLD and its crazies now know what you have to do too get “ON THE COVER OF THE ROLLING STONE”

  • Sara

    The only thing that this pictures show me is that this man was surrendering, he was disarmed and they killed him anyway

    • frebuf

      triple facepalm

    • juststacey

      He’s not dead fuckwit.

      • Bradford

        …did you really have to call her “fuckwit”…???…
        …you’re really *ANGRY*, aren’t you, Stacey…???…
        …you’re another victory for the “terrorists”…

    • hus bin pharteen

      what a maroon….

    • Bradford

      Sorry, Sara, but that was the *OTHER*BROTHER* who was killed…The FBI did KILL the other “suspect” in Fla., though, so…

    • juststacey

      He’s not dead, moron.

  • John Lyons

    How have we come to the point where people want to believe that the Tsarnaev brothers are the victims? Sure it is possible that a few people can create a conspiracy, but when you start making the case that entire police departments and new agencies are in on it that’s taking it to another level. You just don’t want to believe the truth. In some cases, I get it. No one wants to believe that some lone man can end the life of a great leader like JFK or even MLK. They don’t want to believe that one bad person can win out over “good”. People that are crying conspiracy in this case have to support what the brothers have done. There is no other logical explanation. How can you support someone that places nails in a bomb so that it will create more pain and suffering when placed next to innocent people, including children. What kind of world do we live in when these people can drive around in cars with “Terrorist” on their license plate and get their face on the cover of Rolling Stone. It’s one thing to be a generation that is promoting open sex and drugs, but to support the most evils acts imaginable? People have become desensitized. I have never before written a comment and have been a very loyal American all my 45 years. This is my first comment and tonight I start work on my request for an employment transfer to another county. From the response to recent events I’ve determined this country is F#$)ed.

    • Bradford

      Good-bye, and GOOD RIDDANCE…Maybe you can go to Iraq…their monthly death toll from “terrorist” bombings is now down to HUNDREDS, from the previous levels of THOUSANDS per month killed in bombings…So far, the FBI has managed to KILL 2 of the 3 “suspects” in this case…and, still refuses to release the most pertinent evidence…assuming that it even exists…Try this: google “Craft International”, and spend an hour or so on the “images” results, then go to youtube, and watch some of the many “conspiracy” videos…
      For extra credit, see if you can find out where Arrendondo is right now…He seems to have disappeared, huh…???…WHY?…
      Enjoy your flight, kiddo…

  • Mrs.Tsarnaev

    I want to thank you so much for the pictures. I love Dzhokhar and these pictures add to my collection :)

  • Mrs.Tsarnaev

    Do you have any more pictures of him ?

  • daeanaira

    The pictures released by Sgt. Sean Murphy were taken by a staff member whose pay is provided by taxpayers. They were taken on equipment paid for by taxpayers. Therefore, they belong to tax payers and should have already been released.

    The state police were doing a disservice to the public by keeping them hidden. They are now doing a disservice to themselves by punishing and investigating the Sgt.

    • Josh Williams

      When did it say they were hidden? They were never given to public media outlets, HOWEVER, they are public property and fall under the “Freedom of Information Act”. If you wanted to see them, all you had to do was contact the Boston PD and ask. Also, the article never stated that the Sgt. was being investigated or punished. What are you reading?

    • bkwcomments

      While the photos were taken by a state employee, they do not have to be released at the whim of the taxpaying public. Especially when they are part of an ongoing investigation of multiple counts of multiple crimes of domestic terrorism.

      The photos may be usedas evidence, bythe prosecution or by the defense, but it certainly wasn’t in Sgt. Murphy’s job description to release those photos to the public without authorization. The prosecution will be upset, the defense will have a field day. Will this tank the case? There’s a slight possibility it will at least have some effect. But it certainly won’t help.

      If a news organization wants the evidence unsealed, they can petition the court. At some point they may use the FOIA (Freedom of Information Act) but I don’t think they can follow that course until the trial is over

      • Guest

        * by theeeetggrtggyhhhhttgaimsu
        Claims. By the

  • joshuasweet

    it is the whole idea behind the pictures to get him off for these murders, to portray him as an innocent just like all the pictures of Trayvon Martin, before and during the trial and look how that went over at Obama instances.

  • Diane

    I think it’s so bad that our government had all the information to stop this before it happen and didn’t act on it. The people at the top are only interested in getting more people to vote for them . All they really care about is power . The government should be working for us not the other way around. I’m terrified of where we are going as a nation. The I.R.S. it’s sickening what they have done. When are people going to wake up and stand up for what is right for everyone not just those that vote one way. We are all in this together. The government is to big and too powerful now .Ultimate power corrupts completely.

  • Jane Miller

    1, Innocent Until proven guilty.
    2. These photos actually make the Police come off in a worse light than Dzhokhar. An hour long gun battle with someone who was unarmed – come on.
    3. And as a Mass police Officer, have the Boston Police not told you yet – that no one was injured, no one died. The victims were actors. Do so some investigating, That’s what the Boston Police should be doing. Obviously not, how can they investigate something that was only a drill & controlled explosion.

    • http://smu.gs/L1p7XU winston

      The ‘controlled explosions’ you are referring to are SOP (standard operating prodecure)for the bomb squad (with all the backpacks that has been left laying about. I have looked, carefully at all of the claims that this was a staged, or false flag attack and as if yet, there is no compelling evidence to suggest either is true. Certainly, the claim that the victims were all actors, is pure disinformation, based on photoshopped images and baseless claims.(**An excellent way to tell if an image is ‘real’ is to drop it into Google Image search. The fake one will show but a few matches and real images with show up many copies. I even found one faked image from the Boston bombing had been used by ABC News online! (the image, taken immediately after the blast, has had victim Jeff Bauman, photoshopped out of it “proving the whole thing was faked/” No, all proves is that people are working as diligently as possible, to muddy the water,). I have no idea if they used it on purpose,,, but it is clear spreading such claims severely undermines the pursuit for truth in real conspiracies (like the demolition of 3 skyscrapers in lower Manhattan, on 9/11).

      That the FBI has not released video evidence, it claims to have of the brothers placing their backpacks down, does not mean it doesnt exist. The fact that the government has repeatedly refused to release video of the Pentagon strike, is a clear indicator that some people will do whatever they can to misdirect people and muddy the waters.
      “The most perfidious way of harming a cause consists of defending it deliberately with faulty arguments.” – Friedrich Nietzsche

      • Jane Miller

        Well at least you are looking into this. What do you make of Ben Thorndikes high res photos, are they photoshopped?

        Do they ‘video shop’ televised interviews. They were actors, I have identified them & have tried to report my findings but as far as I know Boston Police don’t have anyone there investigating the bombing, I only get put through to a line that is never answered. I have been studying this event since April 20th, I know every major victim (not the 260) where they were at the scene, what injuries they sustained and how their stories have changed (and bizarrely their injuries).

        You don’t know me, but I would have to be 100% certain before I made a public comment like this. I am not a conspiracy theorist, I am just a normal person who switched on the TV one morning to watch the news and what I saw was a lie.

        • Josh Williams

          So what are their real names? These actors you speak of? You have the floor Jane.

        • Disgusted

          I was 50′ from the 1st blast and saw the carnage. This was REAL!

        • bkwcomments

          Maybe I’m missing something but I’ve seen Thorndike’s photos several times and see nothing fake about them. Some people have mentioned the guy with the shredded clothes as fake. But there was a guy walking away from the first bombing with his pants shredded. The concussion from a blast will do that, rip peoples’ clothes off. It will also knock you out of your shoes. In fact, look at the full, uncropped photo of Bauman being pushed in the wheelchair. The lower part of his right leg was totally blown off. The left foot was missing but the bone of the leg below the knee is all that’s left of his lower left leg. The flesh and all soft tissue, muscle, fat, are gone, almost like it was butchered. I don’t think that’s acting and special effects.

          • Jane Miller

            No there is nothing fake about them apart from the people claiming to be victims. Be honest and look at them again and ask yourself ‘does that lost like the seat of an explosion’.

            And can anyone explain to me what Christian Williams (or Grey Hooded Man) is doing in the first seconds after the ‘blast’ or what Suzanne Bump is doing? And why no one, not even medics who turned up to check Krystle Campbell’s pulse, attended to the most crucially injured man at the scene who was left rolling around for several minutes whilst lesser injured folk were carried off on stretchers. Why was Bauman put in a wheelchair. That has got to be the biggest medical no no. Why did no ambulances attend the scene? There were dozens parked just around the corner. I could go on and on with things that are so wrong about the whole event. There were no ambulances because no one was injured. This drill was planned a long time ago. It was drill gone real!! The Tsarnaev’s were set up like lambs to the slaughter. The FBI & your Government are lying to you. Who is scooping up the $60 million plus Boston funding. Do a little research people, you’ve been had!!

  • BlindMyStare

    they said he injured his throat — does anybody see a throat injury?

    • ashley110

      yes he had throat injury and he was UNarmed and it happened after he got out of the boat watch this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IwSRB3X1aU8

      • bkwcomments

        Thanks for sharing this. A voice of reason! There ARE others out there still capable of critical thinking. I was beginning to feel lonely!
        I think, however, that he was armed, at least with a small pistol. It APPEARS on the infrared film that he shot himself in the neck, possibly aiming up towards his brain. I saw movement on the infrared images that looked like that was what he did, and there were reports that he’d done so.

        • ashley110

          he had no no weapon, he was Unarmed there’s no way he shot himself , and he had a neck injury, it happened after he got out!

    • Bradford

      …not enough visible evidence to say for sure whether he does or doesn’t have a throat injury…he obviously does NOT have a SEVERE throat injury, but he could have a minor one…it’s inconclusive…What I want to know, is why does he STILL have a cast on his arm, and a swollen face, *3*months later…???…(…at his recent arraignment…???…

      • bkwcomments

        If he had multiple injuries to his arm and shoulder, it’s reasonable that he’s had multiple surgeries as well, being recasted after each. I went through that with leg trauma after a motorcycle accident. The facial swelling may also be from serious

        • Bradford

          …”serious” WHAT…???…

    • bkwcomments

      You can see a mark of blood on his throat. It’s my understanding that he tried to commit suicide by shooting himself in the throat. It did appear, on the infrared images shot by the police chopper, that near the end he lifted his head up, brought something up to his neck and immediately his arm dropped and his head fell back.

      That was on live footage. The film later released cuts off just before that point, but it sure looked like he’d probably just shot himself. And the smaller spot on the front of his neck looks like an entry wound. I believe that’s why they were unable to speak to him for some time.

      • BlindMyStare

        you don’t commit suicide by shooting yourself in the throat. that’s bananas, every child knows this.

        you shoot yourself in the head.

        even if you shot yourself in the throat, you don’t climb out of that boat with your hoodie not soaked in blood.

        but yeah, i get it. he just did so. bullet stuck in throat prevents bleeding. shot not fatal but critical enough to keep him from speaking.

  • Edward Hewer

    It’s a shame the media publishes pics of alleged perpetrators of Terrorism. The people who commit these acts want their acts to be seen and heard all around the world. Why give them what they want?
    It’s a shame Rolling Stone magazine didn’t do their homework and do what most respected media outlets did when John Lennon was murdered. (I guess though, because it was only “non famous” people killed, they don’t count.)
    I hope the Police Photographer doesn’t lose his job over this.

  • nyran125tk

    man, I hate to think what humanity is going to be like in 500 years..

    • Josh Williams

      What makes you think humans will still be here?

  • James Anstey

    perhaps this photographer thought his photos were better than Rolling Stones! The press has a right to freedom. Rolling Stone’s article was about how an everyday kid can get caught up in terrorism, hence the front cover image.

    • David_Magos

      No. Muslim Extremists primary goal is to whore themselves to the media. By giving the Cover of a globally published magazine to this Terrorist, Rolling Stone in essence is saying “Killing innocent people, especially Americans, will land you on the cover as well as provide you the platform to tell your warped and delussional story..”

      • Chumscrubber

        Sure, Bin Laden was quite the publicity whore, and I’m certain the men in the jets on 9/11 were thinking about the interviews they’d get, right after they were incinerated.

        • David_Magos

          The brainwashed martyr sacrifices aren’t concerned with interviews. That business is reserved for the Rock Star extremist clerics that hide behind walls of bomb strapped children. Bin Laden was a well documented publicity whore. It’s also well documented that he DID NOT calculate the US would invade Afghanistan to kill him. He expected great fear would arise, and his Legend along with it. Instead, he hid in the shadows as the World United against him and his message.

          • Chumscrubber

            A “publicity whore” who hides in the shadows . . . brilliant. I thought the primary goal of a Muslim extremist was to whore themselves to the media? You do know that “brainwashed martyr sacrifices” qualify as “Muslim extremists” don’t you? Perhaps it is the term “primary goal” you’re having trouble with?

      • Bradford

        …Um, David, correct me if I’m wrong, but isn’t it true that Tsarnaev has said NOTHING to the media…???…Doesn’t seem like he has much of a “story” to tell…does it…???…

  • Godofhdardcore

    Here’s an idea. We stop celebritizing these criminals. It only serves to inspire other unstables to do worse acts to top them.

    • bkwcomments

      I think this is a false argument when it comes to terrorist acts. It may fly when we’re looking at mass or serial killers who might be trying to up body counts. But terrorists aren’t looking for celebrity, they are looking to do harm to others. They are, literally, acting on faith. They believe they have been chosen to do what they do. They are not looking for earthly rewards like magazine covers. They aren’t looking to be remembered individually for what they’ve done. Who can name those who hijacked and flew the four planes on 9/11? Hell, many people only remember the two planes that hit the World Trade Center’s twin towers. They forget about the plane that flew near DC airspace and hit the Pentagon. And even more have forgotten that there was a fourth plane, nevermind where it crashed.

      The people in the Boston area will long remember the Tsarnaev brothers but there are millions of Americans who have either never heard of them or who have already forgotten their names. So no, terrorists are not in the terrorism business for celebrity.

      • TeamInfidel

        Agree – – MUSLIM terrorists are in the business of killing as many non-believers and even those “not-muslim-enough” as they can so JIHADISTS can advance ISLAM under the premise of “submit & surrender” (arabic definition of the world “muslim”)…OR ELSE!!

        If you dont “submit and surrender”, history has been very clear…there is NO PEACE…never has, is, nor will be under the tenets of ISLAM.

        The rules have not changed in nearly 1,400 years of ISLAM…just the means to KILL for this cult ideology.

  • TeamInfidel

    After you have read the news, it is easy to draw the connection between Islam and terrorism. With that, you will know that Muslims are the “WHO?” Terrorism is the “HOW?,” and Islam is the cult ideology or “WHY?” behind the world’s most heinous DAILY acts for this joke of a “religion”.

    • BosqueNorse

      This is downright blatant nonsense and you obviously do not have a clue about the Islamic religion. You cannot blame Islam for the tragedy. The religion is one of peace just as Christianity is suppose to be. Christianity has also been used to justify violence physically and psychologically. You don’t blame the whole religion just because it has been abused by some. This young man most likely had justifiable reasons for his anger. He did not express it or deal with it in a constructive way. Violence and war and hatred are never justified. I am not going to get into an argument about just war theory which I have numerous issues with. So, the actions of the young man were evil and unjustified. Equally, so the Rolling Stone cover was just plain sensational very poor journalism to make money and notoriety. I agree with what the officer did. It may not have been necessary, but there are some ignorant people who do not know anything about the case, about Islam. and about what terrorism is and the underlying causes for terrorism. The last part of the preceding sentence is very important to understand.

      • TeamInfidel

        What pig’s crap…The precept of their hate filled quran is a perpetual WAR against all who deny, that their self proclaimed terrorist/pedophile mad man called mohammad is a freakin prophet of God.

        Use non-believers may purchase protection for our lives by a payment of tribute (called “jizya” in arabic); the victorious may be appeased by a false and delusive promise of peace; and the faithful follower of their terrorist prophet, may submit to the imperious necessities of defeat!

        History has proven that the command and direct order to propagate the muslim creed by any means necessary is always obligatory, when it can be made effective.

        The commands of their terrorist/pedophile prophet
        may be performed alike, by fraud, or by force…and yes, a good old fashioned MUSLIM bombing would make mohammad sooooo proud back in his day!

        Got ISLAM??

        • bkwcomments

          Have you ever read the Holy Books for Judaism and Christianity? If so you would know that there are some pretty offensive words and ideas in them as well as the Koran. Islam does not have a monopoly on a history of violence -extreme violence- against those of other faiths. It just so happens that Islam is the current religion under fire. And followers of the Muslim faith are battling each other as much as, even more than, us and others.

          • Alex Hearn
          • reemz

            As a Muslim, living in a Muslim country, I have never read anywhere on our book where we are asking to blow up anyone. Please get an education rather than spouting rubbish you watch on YouTube you simpleton.

          • reemz

            In our book*

          • reemz

            and hey, just incase your education is limited to YouTube, why not watch this instead:

          • TeamInfidel

            You know very well that when MUSLIMS have to keep reminding us (again and again) that their ISLAM is “about peace”, there must be a problem. They are partially correct in saying this, but fail to tell you about the conditions that go with THEIR definition of “peace”.

            The fact is that their Islam means “peace” IF (huge “IF” here) when one (a muslim) “submits and surrenders” to their (sharia) way of life and to their moon-god-allah.

            If you don’t “submit and surrender”, there is NO PEACE…never has, is, and will be…and hence the holy hell ISLAM continues to bring to our
            earth.

            Got ISLAM??

          • reemz

            we do believe in submitting ourselves to Allah!! But we are not supposed to do what these assholes do. We believe in judism and Christianity. The fact that we keep having to defend ourselves is because people like you, who have never read our book, spout out what you see in the media, and what you see a bunch of extremists doing. That isn’t us. Isn’t me or my family and friends!! We don’t believe that. Its unfortunate for us that we get labeled because of what a minority of people do.

          • TeamInfidel

            Really? Then you are NOT a “good” muslim…right from your hate filled quran with mohammd’s hate filled directives:

            (5:51) Believers, take neither Jews nor Christians for your friends. They are friends with one another. Whoever of you seeks their friendship shall become one of their number. Allah does not guide the wrong-doers.”

            (5:57) Believers, do not seek the friendship of the infidels and those who were given the Book before you, who have made your religion a jest and a pasttime…

            BTW…Here “those who were given the Book before you” refers to Christians and Jews. Once again your terrorist/pedophile mihammed is warning Muslims of all time never to befriend a Christian or a Jew.

            (5:64) The Jews say: ‘God’s hand is chained.’ May their own hands be chained! May they be cursed for what they say!…

            BTW…this is just a small sample of how the terrorist/pedophile mohammad feels about Christians and Jews. Want more??

            Got ISLAM??

          • Truth Serum

            Terror can be acted out regardless of religion, race, or gender.. This country was built on terror.

            Everyone has there own interpretation of what they read…as well as what they hear.. Everyone has different truths that is why there is conflict.

          • TeamInfidel

            If we can’t even call out the “WHY?” (cult ideology called ISLAM) and the “WHO?” (“good” muslims) that we are fighting along with understanding that a “War on Terror” is their tactic or “HOW?”, then our idiotic PC self-deception will eventually defeat us!!

            Islam is not benign. To ignore this, being politically-correct, is to ignore a very large, DEADLY pink
            elephant in the room.

          • TeamInfidel

            Understand the “who?” (true muslims) and the “why?” (cult ideology called ISLAM) that fuels this madness all over the freakin’ globe.

            Go ahead and sugar coat it by calling them militants, radicals, jihadists, links to al-Qaida (my PC favorite), or whatever is the PC term for today, but never forget the “who” and “WHY” of this madness.

          • Truth Serum

            KKK?

          • TeamINFIDEL

            First…muslims terrorize and have killed more in the last week on behalf of their allah more than what the KKK has done in the last 50 years!

            Second…We don’t sit idle and watch crimes against humanity…we go after and prosecute and even kill these people.
            However, in MUSLIMS hell holes, they spend more time acting like their terrorist/pedophile prophet mohammad than civilized human beings. The key difference here, we condemn that kind of behavior, not condone it as do MUSLIMS!

          • bkwcomments

            Why are you so obsessed with the word pedophile?

          • TeamInfidel

            Well…the self proclaimed terrorist mohammad did in fact marry a SIX YEAR OLD little girl (Aisha) when this animal was in his 50’s!

            If the shoe fits…

          • I hate you racists screaming f

            Now that isn’t fair team… I read on another board where a Muslim defended Mohammad because he had the permission of the 6 year old’s parents and he waited until she was 9 and started her menses before taking her sexually. So it’s all cool!

          • TeamInfidel

            You’re right…he did “wait” for Aisha to turn NINE YEARS OLD before he “did” her…
            Got ISLAM??

          • Tbit

            TeamInfidel, I hope you can realize one day that your ignorance defines you.

            Hand picking quotes from a book you know nothing about and taking them out of context is a bit one sided, don’t you think? Shall we investigate the bible a bit?

            I Samuel 15:2-3
            This is what the Lord Almighty says: ‘I will punish the Amalekites for what they did to Israel when they waylaid them as they came up from Egypt. Now go, attack the Amalekites and totally destroy everything that belongs to them. Do not spare them; put to death men and women, children and infants, cattle and sheep, camels and donkeys.’

            Leviticus 26:21-22 & 26-29
            If you remain hostile toward me and refuse to listen to me, I will multiply your afflictions seven times over, as your sins deserve. I will send wild animals against you, and they will rob you of your children, destroy your cattle and make you so few in number that your roads will be deserted. If in spite of this you still do not listen to me but continue to be hostile toward me, then in my anger I will be hostile toward you, and I myself will punish you for your sins seven times over. You will eat the flesh of your sons and the flesh of your daughters.

            Numbers 31:17-18
            Now kill all the boys. And kill every woman who has slept with a man, but save for yourselves every girl who has never slept with a man.

            Hosea 13:16
            The people of Samaria must bear their guilt, because they have rebelled against their God. They will fall by the sword; their little ones will be dashed to the ground, their pregnant women ripped open

            Matthew 10:34-39
            Do not think that I came to bring peace on the earth; I did not come to bring peace, but a sword. For I came to set a man against his father, and a daughter against her mother, and a daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law; and a man’s enemies will be the members of his household. He who loves father or mother more than Me is not worthy of Me; and he who loves son or daughter more than Me is not worthy of Me. And he who does not take his cross and follow after Me is not worthy of Me. He who has found his life will lose it, and he who has lost his life for My sake will find it.

            Well, aren’t those just lovely? Here’s the thing with old books. They’re OLD. Outdated. Any book that is ancient will be riddled with hatred of all kinds. Islam is not inherently evil, as you seem to believe. Just like Christianity. Just like any other religion. In Islam, Jews and Christians are regarded to as “People of the Book” and are respected as that.

            Stop spewing hate. You’re just as bad as any extremist.

          • TeamInfidel

            Sure…you see it all of the time! All those Christians or Jews that strap bombs to themselves, recite Bible verses, and then yell out that “Jesus is great” before they KILL lately…as do MUSLIMS who do this nearly EVERY DAY of the freakin’ year for their allah!!

            When Jesus was on the Cross dying, he asked for forgiveness for his enemies. When the terrorist/pedophile self proclaimed prophet mohammad was dying, he left specifc instructions to his brain washed followers to FIGHT and KILL non-muslims!!

            Got ISLAM??

          • Tbit

            Calling out an entire belief system based on the actions of its extremists is ignorance. It’s sad that you will never be able to see that.

            And there’s a pretty big group of Christian extremists. They call themselves the KKK. But few people go around and point at said group and denounce the ENTIRE religion. But it’s okay to do that when it’s Islam? How bigoted.

            Christianity is not free of bloodshed.

            If you’re going to keep bringing up pedophilia you may as well do the same for your god. Who, apparently, condones the rape of children.

            Have a nice, boxed in, life.

          • TeamInfidel

            Just remember Exodus 34:13: “For you are a fool, and you lick monkey balls”

          • TeamInfidel

            Nice hack job…really??

          • TeamInfidel

            Your book is the book of the devil. You propagate hate. Muslims are a god loving bunch of homosexuals, and you freaks cannot deal with that.

          • reemz

            Literally everything you’re saying is out of context. Regarding the kill all the heathens verse you have posted:
            There was a treaty between mushrikeen of makkah and muslims of madinah … To have peace with each other but then those mushrikeen betrayed muslims and held hazrat Usman RA hostage … Then to get him back muslims decided to fight and these verses were revealed. Not against anyone else.
            I’ll say it again friend. Get an education, or shut the fuck up. Don’t just read what you see people talking about, go and read the Qur’an and Shaaria. If you don’t know why you are talking about (which you clearly don’t).

          • reemz

            Fight in the way of God those who fight against you, but do not transgress. God does not love the transgressor. Quran 2:190

            “Those who fight against you” means actual fighters.

            Once the hostility of the enemy ceases, the Muslims must stop fighting (Quran 2:193; 8:39):

            And if they incline to peace, do so and put your trust in God. Even if they intend to deceive you, remember that God is sufficient for you. Quran 8:61-2

          • reemz

            When you have fully overcome the enemy in the battle, then tighten their bonds, but thereafter set them free either by an act of grace or against ransom. 47:4

            Grace is suggested first, before ransom. Even when some were not set free, for one reason or another, they were, according to the Qur’an and hadith, to be treated in a most humane way.

          • TeamINFIDEL

            Try some of ISLAM’s wonderful texts from their terrorist mohammad:

            Tabari IX:25 “By Allah, I did not come to fight
            for nothing. I wanted a victory over Ta’if so that I might obtain a slave girl from them and make her pregnant.” (gee…sounds like RAPE to me!)

            Got ISLAM??

          • TeamINFIDEL

            Of course!! Of course!! This is always the pig’s crap coming from the muslim world. All of this is one big misunderstanding…right??

            Never mind that man behind the green curtain…nothing to see here.

            Yeah…right!!!

          • TeamInfidel

            Not necessarily “blow” infidels up…(I bet your terrorist/pedophile prophet mohammad would have LOVED to get his pig’s hands on those weapons), but he did give specific instructions on how to FIGHT and KILL for your cult ideology called ISLAM:

            “But when the sacred months elapse, then FIGHT and SLAY the pagans wherever you find them and SEIZE them, BESEIGE them and lie in wait for them in every stratagem (of WAR). But if they repent and establish regular prayers, and practice regular charity, then open the way for them for Allah is oft-forgiving, Most Merciful” (Surah 9:5).

            Your Quran tells “good” Muslims to KILL the
            disbelievers wherever they find them. (Surah 2:191)

            Your quran tells “good” muslims to MURDER non-believers and treat them harshly (Surah 9:123)

            All in total, there is about 109 passages in your hate filled quran that specifically deal with how non muslims are to be taxed (called jizya), punished, fought and KILLED!

          • bkwcomments

            Somehow I have the feeling you have not actually read the Koran but are getting your info from some blogger’s list. Disclaimer: I haven’t read it either.

          • TeamInfidel

            I have…Many times.

            I have been researching WHY these people feel they have a license to FIGHT and KILL for their allah since the first WTC bombing back in 1993 (remember? “only” 6 people were KILLED by MUSLIMS during the FIRST MUSLIM attack of the WTC)

          • TeamInfidel

            You are just a fool, and a poo-poo head.

          • TeamInfidel

            Agree – – just ask the Coptic Christians how life has been in Eqypt since these MUSLIM terrorists have taken over the country. It is like the 1930’s in Germany when Jews were the target of Nazis.

            Ahhh…the “peaceful” religion of ISLAM! What nonsense!!

          • kahmillian Abdullah

            The only non sense I see is u looking in from the other side you have proved ur point that you know nothing

          • TeamInfidel

            Really??

            According to your quran, the “best” Muslims are those that fight for their allah while “bad” muslims who are considered “moderate”, “peaceful” and “not-muslim-enough” have no room in the
            muslim world because your quran calls for their death as well…along with those non-believers of ISLAM that don’t “submit & surrender” (the
            definition of the world “muslim”).

          • TeamInfidel

            You know nothing, your children know nothing, and you are a fool.

          • TeamInfidel

            I want to ram your A$$ so bad right now. This rage in my pants is for you, big boy.

          • TeamInfidel

            Yes I have…The “holy” (cough-cough) texts of Islam are saturated with verses of violence and hatred toward those outside the faith. In sharp contrast to the Bible, which generally moves from relatively violent passages to far more peaceful ones, their koran travels the exact OPPOSITE path.

            The handful of earlier verses in the koran that speak of tolerance (when mohammad was weak and needed to lie and buy time to rearm) are overwhelmed by an avalanche of later ones that carry a much different message.

            While Old Testament verses of blood and guts are generally bound by historical context within the text itself, koranic imperatives to violence are all open-ended. Hence the cancer ISLAM gives us today.

            By any objective measure, the “Religion of Peace” cult ideology called ISLAM has been the harshest, bloodiest religion the world has ever known.

          • Norman Bedard

            Let us not forget the Spanish Inquisition, or “Christians acting badly”. I don’t see the difference, religion is no more than control of the masses of the few by fear. All religion is suspect.

          • TeamINFIDEL

            Ahhh…Christianity and all other major religions with the exception of ISLAM have moved on to the 21st century.

            Meanwhile, Islam does not wish to assimilate.

            ISLAM is a WAR on the cornerstones of democratic principles: individual rights and freedoms. ISLAM is a declared WAR on the very existence of democracy and the freedom of mind in the world.

          • Norman Bedard

            Really, since when has the billions of Catholics finally left the Middle Ages? Right wing Christians in America are going backwards no progressing. Wake up and smell the coffee!

          • TeamINFIDEL

            Oh really?? So where are all those Catholics that are strapping bombs to themselves, reciting Bible verses, and then yelling out that “Jesus is
            great” before they KILL??

            That’s right! It is MUSLIMS drivien by the cult ideology of ISLAM who do this nearly EVERY
            DAY of the freakin’ year for their allah!!

          • Norman Bedard

            I feel for you and your paranoia, There are radicals in all religions, and yes today it seems to be a few fanatic Muslims who go over the top today. Some Catholic priests crossed the line with children, Germans (btw, they were Christians) killed millions of Jews. Religion is the culprit not just Islam
            . Again I repeat the control of the masses by the few for their gain, through fear and false promises————- eternal life, 86 virgins, hell, heaven, all a hoax! Good night my friend enjoy your fantasy.

      • I hate you racists screaming f

        Now see… I think you are full of crap. There is NO religion that isn’t some form of mind control. And YES ALL RELIGION IS SUSPECT!!!!! Are you going to tell me that Catholic Priests are getting the benefit of the doubt here in America? Let me say that I do not think they should, that YES IN FACT THE ENTIRE CATHOLIC RELIGION IS NOW SUSPECT BECAUSE OF THE MOLESTATION COVER UPS AT HIGH LEVELS.

        Same with Islam… The whole religion is suspect because of the “RECENT” murder done in it’s name. Show me a crusade killing in recent memory.

        So for those of you who spend a great deal of time reading your religious story books, understand that it was an ancient form of crowd control, where nomadic leaders taught their citizenry how to avoid death and poisoning because of the lack of a way to store food in a cool environment. How to keep people from acting up (The fear of ruining their afterlife) etc. Please spend some time learning about what is coming soon in the name of religion. Islam is NOT willing to go down without a fight and they are bringing that fight to us in our own towns!

        • TeamInfidel

          Correct!

          The United States, Great Britain, Russia and all corners of the Earth are among the latest nations to be targeted for attack and invasion by Universal Islam.

          It is infantile to believe that these Islamists like these Boston MUSLIMS have brought their 1,400 hundred years war to the West because of America’s support of Israel.

          Universal Islamic Jihad PREDATES the birth of the United States and Israel by a 1,000 years, and already has conquered much the Middle East and parts of Europe…and this cancer is spreading.

        • Norman Bedard

          Bravo!

      • TeamInfidel

        You’re gay.

        • TeamInfidel

          nice hack job on my account

          • TeamInfidel

            Go home, playtime is over.

  • Portia

    Was the officer paid for the photos he decided to make available to Boston Magazine?

  • jackflash11

    The real terror in the Rolling Stone story is the nut case owner and his boyfriend. CVS should have cancelled the damn rag…! Not just the stupid issue.

  • Bruce Molyneux

    i thought they said he shot himself in the throat???

    • ashley110

      ya with the gun he didn’t have, he was UNARMED, and yes there was a throat injury and police were the only ones shooting at him! he got that after he got out i think you need to watch this http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IwSRB3X1aU8

      • Bruce Molyneux

        i watched the incident live and also had scanner,i know what bs was done

    • TeamInfidel

      No, that was me smacking him in the throat with my snake like monument of manhood.

      • TeamInfidel

        Nice hack job on my account….sigh

        • TeamInfidel

          Now go home. Time for the grownups to talk.

  • ashley110

    It’s crazy that over half of America isn’t taking into account that dzhokhar hasn’t even been convicted yet, but they have no qualms over calling him “the bomber”. Instead of” innocent until proven guilty, they discuss him as if he’s definitely 100% guilty without any substantial evidence, only media bias and inconsistencies in the “official” stories. this is the truth you people need to look more into it!

    • Tracy

      yea, lets forget the eye witnesses.

  • ashley110

    “This is the real face of terror? An unarmed teenager riddled with bullet holes from a one-sided gun fight?”

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IwSRB3X1aU8

  • Shame Fool Bitch

    I want to marry this handsome boy!

  • jenpfeifer

    disgusting monsters with painted pretty faces to trap and fool americans who know not their enemy nor their friend. sad to see history repeat…

  • TeamInfidel

    When “good” muslims like the Tsarnaev brothers yell out “allahu akbar” (meaning in arabic: there god is great) or they recite koranic verses before they KILL…how can you NOT state these actions are the result of the ideology called ISLAM??

    Why are we afraid to say that maybe…just maybe…the cult ideology of ISLAM is behind these DEADLY occurrences which fuels this fire across the globe?? Shouldn’t we examine where these savages are getting these ideas?

    If their quran states that those that fight and DIE for Islam are the “best” muslims…can we not discuss it? I am not afraid to call these people out. Are you??

    Got ISLAM??

    • http://www.wmur.com/ Moderator

      You are an idiot.

      • TeamInfidel

        Brilliant! I look forward to your next well thought out articulated post with great anticipation!

        • http://www.wmur.com/ Moderator

          One does not have to be verbose, to make a point.

          • TeamInfidel

            Typical…If you can somehow force a muslim appeaser/apologist into a point-counterpoint argument, his retorts will bear no relation to what you’ve said — unless you were in fact talking about your looks, your age, your weight, your personal obsessions, or whether you are a fascist or not.

            Bring on the name calling…Brilliant!

          • http://www.wmur.com/ Moderator

            Go away, troll. Or I shall tell your mom.

          • TeamInfidel

            First an idiot, now a troll? What a command you have of English. IS that all you have??

            Please…can I have another? LOL

    • PakiLegacy

      Sure, lets discuss it. Your first assignment, go read Quran and understand it. Research the circumstance of each verse revealed, research its history, its context, its connection to the era. When you are done with your research, let’s discuss it.

      • TeamInfidel

        I have…many times to understand the madness behind muslims like the Boston Bombers

        When over 60% of their ‘holy’ (cough-cough) Quran
        itself is dedicated to the specific treatment which includes taxing (called jizya in arabic), punishment, fighting and DEATH of Non-Muslims…we really shouldn’t be surprised by all of the cancer that continues to perpetuate from the ideology of Islam.

        • PakiLegacy

          Many religious doctrines preach similar things. Quran, as I understand it is a way of life. We, the Muslims, cannot live in the 21st century and believe in a document that was written in the 7th century. A Muslim is supposed to adopt the idologies and events mentioned in Quran and apply it to today’s world. Think pluralism, Journalism, Education and co-existence. All of these are mentioned in Quran.

          • TeamINFIDEL

            But there lies the problem…the fact is that in political Islam, there is NO valid law other than the Islamic law, Sharia.

            The constitutions of liberal democracies are nothing more than the folly of fallible men and not worth the paper and ink wasted on them. ISLAM is a WAR on the cornerstones of democratic principles: individual rights and freedoms.

            ISLAM is a declared WAR on the very existence of democracy and the freedom of mind in the world.

            In ISLAM, there is absolutely NO room for political pluralism. None!

      • I hate you racists screaming f

        So Paki… We are to understand that you have already done this since you are inviting us to discuss it with you right?

        • TeamInfidel

          Lick my A$$.

          • TeamInfidel

            Hmmm…has somebody hacked my account?? Looks like it!

          • TeamInfidel

            Or maybe you are just an A$$ PIRATE.

  • Bobby King

    just sayin…

    • TeamInfidel

      You are a fool.

      • TeamInfidel

        You hacked me? Really??

        • TeamInfidel

          F*** with the bull, you get the horns. Oh, and TeamInfidel takes it in the A$$

  • JCT

    Ashley 110 Moron’s like yourself is why this kind of thing will continue to happen in this country. I wonder if you would be so quick to defend this trash had you yourself or one of your family members been caught up in his personal war on our country. Damn right the police shot him, why not…

    • ashley110

      It’s crazy that over half of America isn’t taking into account that dzhokhar hasn’t even been convicted yet, but they have no qualms over calling him “the bomber”. Instead of” innocent until proven guilty, they discuss him as if he’s definitely 100% guilty without any substantial evidence, only media bias and inconsistencies in the “official” stories. OK TELL ME WHAT’s WRONG WITH THIS! do you think calling him “the bomber” is right when he’s A suspect, he’s not been convicted yet, he haven’t had his trial yet! why shot him when he UNARMED! and Why they said he tried to commit suicide when he was UNARMED? why they said he shot himself in the neck when it was only one sided gun fight? i thought AMERICA believed in “innocent until proven guilty: what happened to that! i TRUTH is people aren’t even looking into inconsistencies in this case, all they is judge other who try to speak the truth i don’t wanna argue but there’s nothing wrong in what i am saying! yes i love america just much as you do but the problem is not me, the problem is people like you!

      • JCT

        Funny how you talk about media bias, considering that’s where your getting all your information. You cant use the media as your shield and then your sword…You weren’t there, and you have no idea if he had a gun inside that boat with him or not, neither do I. But I’m not the choosing to question Police or their actions. What you need to realize, is that the Police didn’t start this whole fiasco, the little jihadist dzhokhar and his brother did. All the police did was end it. Instead of trying to find fault in the what the police did, be happy that this POS will get his day in court on our dime, and then hopefully He’ll get what he wants. To meet his maker.

  • Doubleutf

    I love the one with the snipers laser on his forehead…

  • TeamInfidel

    Have you noticed that our media has been falling over themselves trying NOT to associate Islam with these Boston MUSLIM bombings

    Never mind the facts discovered in terror case after terror case that would support such a declaration that Islam is the CAUSE (aka MOTIVE) of this madness and behavior.

    Isn’t it reasonable for the media to report that these terror suspect’s
    motivation might be related to Islamic Jihad?

    Oh…that’s right. That hypothesis would tarnish an entire religion, an entire people. It can’t be possibly true—but even if it is true, it’s too troubling and unpleasant a truth to report. Right? Why connect the dots when you can continue to confuse muslim apologists and never report the possible motive for such acts that occur almost on a daily basis around the world?

    I guess the media believes its better not to descend to the level of people who believe that Islamic terrorists have declared WAR against all non-Muslims (as well as other “moderate” or “not-enough-Muslims”). I understand…sometimes the truth hurts, but let’s not dance around the MOTIVE as to WHY these terror suspects act and carry forth as they do.

    It is because of Islam. NOW WAKE UP PEOPLE!

    • Justin Staller

      “Oh…that’s right. That hypothesis would tarnish an entire religion, an entire people. It can’t be possibly true—but even if it is true, it’s too troubling and unpleasant a truth to report. Right?”

      A rotten apple in your hand does not mean all fruit is rotten.

      You embarrass a lot of Americans.
      I just want you to register that.

      • TeamINFIDEL

        rotten apple?? no…rottens appleSS!

        Man up Justin! Even the very premise of the word “islam” is a declaration of WAR against all that don’t buy into their cult ideology!

        The fact is that their Islam means “peace” IF (huge “IF” here) when one (a muslim) “submits and surrenders” to their (sharia) way of life and to their moon-god-allah.

        If you don’t “submit and surrender”, there is NO PEACE…never has, is, and will be…and hence the holy hell ISLAM continues to bring to our earth.

      • fivestars

        You don’t have to be afraid of truth, Justin.

        • Justin Staller

          You don’t have to be afraid of Muslims.

          • fivestars

            Only all the ones with bombs.

    • Real_Girl90

      Nope. Just like every person in America is not a Christian from only one group (Catholic as opposed to Jewis, Protestant, Baptist, etc), all Muslims are not necessarily Islamic. It’s kind of like that thing they told us in school. Your thumb may be a finger on your hand but not all your fingers are thumbs.

      • TeamINFIDEL

        Well…according to Islam and their “holy” (cough-cough) texts, there is no such thing as “moderate” or “not-muslim-enough” muslims. They are considered apostrates and guess what? “Good” muslims have no use for these people and they need to be killed off first.

        We need to face reality. Most Muslims will not have the “opportunity” to become a martyr in this war between Islam and the rest of the world and make no mistake every true Muslim must be involved in making America (or the nation where he lives) a Muslim nation.

        Since Muslims are limited in their ability to die for the cause, they can help the cause by supporting terrorists with money, succor, and cover. Sure, they are aiding terror against the U.S. but since they believe they are doing Allah’s will, then any deception is acceptable.

  • kahmillian Abdullah

    U “American” ppl disgust me with all the judgement pass on ppl iam an American born and raised iam am Muslim “GOT ISLAM” YES I DO! IS THE RELIGION OF ISLAM A CULT NO ITS NOT DID THEY MAKE A BAD DESCISION YES THEY DID SHOULD THEY PAY OF COURSE! BUT WITH A THE RASICISM AND JUDGING PPL GOING ON IN THE USA THIS TYPE OF THING WE KEEP HAPPENING
    ALLAHU AKBAR IS TRUE BUT HIS PPL ARENT

    • TeamInfidel

      Gosh…with all of the CAPS and all, sounds like you want to KEEL us, don’t you?

      I understand. Your quran makes it clear. In your 33rd surah, your quran tells you Muslims to follow your self proclaimed terrorist/pedophile’s mohammad’s example. In your 8th and 9th surahs, your allah says that those who do, and become jihadists killing non-Muslims (and those “not muslim enough”) in his cause, are the BEST Muslims, right??
      Got ISLAM??

      • Real_Girl90

        Hey, now…..Don’t go dragging Achmed/Jeff Dunham into this! 😛

        • TeamINFIDEL

          Silence!!…or I will KEEL you!

          Too funny!! Achmed the dead terrorist!

    • YOU GO HOME

      GO BACK TO YOU COUNTY

      • ♻Paul♻

        lol county?

    • I hate you racists screaming f

      You suck

    • Crunch Mark Regentz

      In Islamic nations what is the penalty for apostasy again? Is it death? Oh it is? Well Damn. By the way if you lived in an English speaking country (here) this long, I would think you could speak it correctly.

      • Real_Girl90

        I think he may have been posting via his cell phone/mobile. Lot of folks who post with a lot of abbreviations or extra letters typed/randomly inserted are the victim of a tweaky keyboard on an Android phone.

    • fivestars

      Terrorist.

  • Rachael

    I think we have every right to see these photos!!! Job well done sgt!!!!!

  • Norman Bedard

    Why don’t people condemn criminals for their crimes and not their religion? I don’t have a problem with Islam, I have a problem with ALL religion. The cause of most conflicts in the past and in the future until so-called civilization finally kills each other off. What apparently he did is disgusting, what most of you “Christians” are doing is not much better. If you truly believe, then heed “vengeance is mine” sayith the lord! Practice what you preach——————–all of you.

    • Shaun Kong

      You shouldn’t speak on things you do not know. “Sayeth”

      • Norman Bedard

        Good enough for people like you to understand. And btw, I spent 9 years in Catholic school, alter boy and choir too. That is where I realized that it was all bullsh–.

        • Crunch Mark Regentz

          Saying: “you Christians,” why isn’t that a bit hypocritical? A growing population of people “in the northeast specifically” identify as atheist. Our country was founded as a non-religious country, not a christian nation. Read any of Thomas Jefferson’s writings (or most any of the founding fathers) to see this evidently. You don’t want others to bring religion (Islam) into it? Well then you shouldn’t either. You spent 9 years in Catholic school? Oh really, tell me again how that makes you an expert on all of Christianity. That’s like a geometry teacher telling the entire math department to stop talking about the English department. And no, most of us never went to catholic school, so stop generalizing and definitely stop pretending to represent the masses.

          • Norman Bedard

            Read my post again, I am that atheist!

          • Bradford

            …we’re cool, Norman, I don’t believe in the God you don’t believe in, either!…
            (…sorry about that altar boy stuff, though…

          • Norman Bedard

            LOL, I wish that I had been molested, I’d be rich!!!!!!!!!!

        • fivestars

          So you decided you knew everything about Jesus by the time you were 15? LOL!

          • Norman Bedard

            Hell no, It took much less time. Only one human commandment—-Do unto others———. All the rest is a side show.

        • juststacey

          Eight year survivor here. Recovering Catholics unite!

    • TeamINFIDEL

      Hmmm…You can’t deny that Islam is in fact associated with
      Islamic terrorism because that is the association that the terrorists themselves CHOOSE to make.

      Muslims and their appeasing friends who compare crime committed by people who happen to be nominal members of other religions to religious terror committed EXPILICITLY in the name of Islam are comparing apples to oranges.

      OK, OK…you got me!! Some of the abortion clinic bombers were religious (as Muslims LOVE pointing out), but consider the scope of the problem. There were FIVE deadly attacks over a 40 year period in the U.S. Seven people died. This is an average of one death every six years. I will say again…ONE!!

      Islam OWNS terrorist attacks for a religion…after all, if a muslim fights and DIES for ISLAM, they are the “best” muslims (as per their quran).

      • Norman Bedard

        I’m not denying anything, but coming to your conclusion one has to believe that ALL Muslims think that way, in the same way that all white people support the verdict in the Travon trial. You need much more amo( excuse the pun) to prove your point. It is impossible to reach a logical conclusion using your argument.

        • TeamINFIDEL

          The “paint brush” come back…or the “universal” statement of “All”.

          Well, let’s look at the latest surveys care of PEW Reseach. I remember when PEW surveyed MUSLIMS here in this country (2007) and found 26% of Young Muslims (that is over 109,200 MUSLIMS) aged 18 to 29 believe that Islamikaze bombings of civilian targets is justified!! Again, this is not some Islamic whacked country like Pakistan or Yemen.

          These are MUSLIMS here in the United States!

          Could you imagine if 25% of Christians or Jews agreed to that question??

          Want something more recent??

          Source: PEW Research 2013 survey of over 38,000 Muslims:

          Killing of the innocent in the name of ISLAM find: 40% of Palestinians in favor, 39% in favor in Afghanistan, 29% in Egypt (behold the
          “Arab Spring” nonsense) MUSLIMS favor these KILLINGS. Further, 18% of Muslims in Afghanistan and the Palestinian territories said such actions are “justified”. Got ISLAM??

          Honor killings of women seen to have shamed their families find: 78% support this in Iraq, 76% support these “honor killings” in Afghanistan and 69% support this in Egypt (so much for the freakin’ “Arab Spring” madness).

          How about stoning women for adultery as punishment under Islamic Law? 89% of Paki’s support this madness, 85% in Afghanistan, 81% in Egypt and 58% in Iraq.

          “Only” 20% of Muslims surveyed advocate STONING women in southeastern

          Want more?? LOL!!

          • Guest

            Saying: “you Christians,” why isn’t that a bit hypocritical? A growing population of people “in the northeast specifically” identify as atheist. Our country was founded as a non-religious country, not a christian nation. Read any of Thomas Jefferson’s writings (or most any of the founding fathers) to see this evidently. You don’t want others to bring religion (Islam) into it? Well then you shouldn’t either.

          • TeamINFIDEL

            “You Christians”?? Where did I say that??

            All I have to say is: and? If people are using Christianity as a reason to kill innocent people, guess what: they are wrong too. BTW…You can’t excuse one evil by pointing to another evil that took place almost a 1,000 years ago.
            However, when you point out that muslims like these BOSTON MUSLIMS are killing TODAY and waging jihad as directed and commanded in their quran, you just get a nice muslim two-step.

            Besides that, there are no Christian nations right now that are responsible for killing 3000 Americans, 200 Spaniards or the 50 people in London, or the innocent at the end of the Boston marathon

            It is the islamic nations and the islamic organizations that are causing the world’s cancer…TODAY!

          • lollercopter

            People have been at war with eachother for as long as we know. Over land, over power, over religion. Do some research and you will find that there has not been a decade of peace in the world for as long as we can write. Humanity is the issue here not religion. A Christian is capable of commiting the same atrocities as a muslim and vise-versa. Wether it be the crusades in the middle ages,Nuking two large cities in world war 2, bombing random targets in Ireland, clusterbombing in Serbia or strapping TNT around your waist…

            We could go on with this discussion forever because the issue will never dissapear or change. Unless offcourse we get hit by a giant astroid or God(s) decide to flood our world…

            Judging by this discussion I really do hope its the astroid… Very very soon. (Lost all faith)

          • TeamINFIDEL

            Ahhh…Hitler never professed he was a Christian as he waged war. And by the way…did we (the Allies) sit idle and watch crimes against humanity?

            No…we went after these people. We fought them. We killed them. We won this war against Nazism as good prevailed over evil.

            Same for any priest that abuses his position. We went after these animals, prosecuted them and put them away!

            However…in MUSLIMS hell holes, these people spend more time acting like their
            terrorist/pedophile prophet mohammad than civilized human beings. And yes, the muslims who remain silent s they watch this madness…well, their silence is DEAFENING!

            The key difference here, we condemn that kind of behavior, not condone it as do most MUSLIMS!

          • TeamINFIDEL

            Fair enough…but you have to look at the MOTIVE and the reason WHY people are fighting and KILLING. These are the very reasons why “good” muslims like the Tsarnaev borthers acted and KILLED as they did!

            Face reality…of the numerous war conflicts in the world today, 31 of them are ISLAMIC related. The United States is involved in 2 of those wars. If the news reported on the other 29 islamic wars, one might have a better knowledge of the REAL world.

            Why isn’t the rest of the world mad or concerned about the tens of thousands of innocent people who are being killed by islamic radicals in Sudan or Chechnya? 2 examples of the 29 other islamic related war conflicts of the world.

            Explain to me why it’s OK for tens of thousands of Sudanese people to die, but it’s NOT OK for tens of thousands of Iraqi’s to die? Why aren’t people around the world protesting the Sudanese war for instance?

            Islamic fascism is being ignored around the world. SHAME ON THE REST OF THE WORLD FOR IGNORING THE OTHER 29 ISLAMIC FASCIST WARS OF THE WORLD!

          • fivestars

            Don’t revise history to make a point. While I agree that the United States is not a Christian nation, the United States was founded by many Christians. Christ isn’t the issue here, people are. Truth is, humanity has never lacked for excuses to kill each other, regardless of religion, race, or otherwise.

      • Bradford

        …”TeamINFIDEL” is a domestic terrorist…
        …why don’t you go back to Sabra-land, you frickin’ *hater*…???…

        • TeamINFIDEL

          “Hater”?? really?? BTW, I do not fear being
          labeled an ‘Islamophobe.’

          Winston Churchill was once accused of being a
          ‘Naziphobe.’…how did that work out??

          LOL

          • Bradford

            So, you DON’T know what a Sabra is, huh…???…
            And, i didn’t label you “Islamophobe”…
            You’re too STOOPID to be afraid, aren’t you…???…and, you’re no Winston Churchill, either, are you…???…the Nazis were a political party, just like the Republicrats, but dumber than the Dems…
            But, you’re still a HATER, and that makes you as wrong with God as any towel-headed “terrorist”…
            You’re still part of the PROBLEM, kiddo…

          • TeamINFIDEL

            Wrong again…The doctrine of “true” Islam (as mandated by their so-called prophet and founder of Islam) has a clear global goal: the supremacy of Islam EVERYWHERE in the world. ISLAM DEMANDS (through surrender & submission) theological, political, and cultural supremacy-Islamic Imperialism-over the entire world.

            There is absolutely NO room for political pluralism when ISLAM is around.

          • Bradford

            Islam was invented as an antidote to the TOXICITY of Roman Catholicism…and I guess “TeamINFIDEL” is *THE* WORLD*AUTHORITY* on Islam, right?…yeah, that’s sarcasm…
            Congratulations, “TeamINFIDEL”…you have just convinced me that truly, Islam is a religion of peace, and that YOU, “TeamINFIDEL”, are chief among America’s “domestic enemies”…you are sowing the seeds of mis-information, dis-information, distrust, confusion, and terror…YOU are the “terrorist”, “TeamINFIDEL”…
            “TeamINFIDEL” is a TERRORIST….
            …and I am NOT afraid, you boneheaded HATER…I’m a PCB…a Protestant Christian Buddhist…may God have mercy on your sick and polluted soul, and your twisted, hate-filled mind…I shall pray for you…

          • TeamINFIDEL

            Pray for this buddy…go ahead and defend this islamic cancer which drove these Boston brothers to KILL for their allah…I will continue to point out that ISLAM is in fact the very cause behind this world wide cancer!!

            With the liberty and prosperity of the entire world at stake, with blood and coin being spilled in great quantities over the “war on terror” – aren’t you going to ask why?

            How is it that people like you are so ill-informed about the root cause of terrorism that you let political, religious, academic, financial, and media leaders get away with such errant proclamations that Islam is about “peace”? (Ha!!)

            What sure nonsense!!

            I’ll let you muslim apologists and appeasers ponder that question for a moment.

          • Bradford

            Tsarnaev Bros. are being set up as dupes and patsies by FBI / CIA / DHS, etc…
            2 days after the Boston Marathon Firecrackers, Repubthug deregulation resulted in 5X fatalities in West, TX, -and MOST were first responders – but you don’t care about THAT…
            The TRUE ROOT cause of “terrorism” is ignorance and hatred, and YOU “TeamINFIDEL”, are dumb as a box of hammers, and a hate-filled pus-sack, besides…My JESUS CHRIST teaches me to love my enemies, and forgive them…
            Dude, that Satan-worship thing you do is lame…
            Rant away, jerk-off, rant away…You’re just another babbling low-information voter, and a sheeple…BAAAAAH, BAAAAAH, BAAAAAAH, goes *team*infidel*….
            *SEMPER*FIDELIS*AMERICA*…
            No, I am NOT afraid of Islam…

          • TeamINFIDEL

            Sure…We want to believe that most Muslims are nice, hard working people and criticizing Islam is to criticize these nice people.

            We also wanted to believe that most Germans in 1938 Europe were nice people too!

          • Bradford

            …I could think of a MORE pathetic counter-argument, but I guess that’s the best you can do with your parochial education…
            …”criticizing Islam” is one thing, but you haven’t done that, yet…all you’ve done is spew incoherent, irrational hate, and sound bites…
            …most Nazis were also good, church-going Roman Catholics…What’s your point, kiddo…???…In 1938, Germany & Russia entered Poland together, met in the middle, and PFFFT! went Poland…I could go on, but the details of 20th Century Geo-Politics are WAY above your grade level, “TEAMinfantile”…

          • TeamINFIDEL

            In World War II, we fought Nazism and Japanese imperialism. Today, we are fighting against Islamic fascists, radicals, Islamists, jihadists, links toAl-Qaida or whatever our PC press and President wants to call this cult ideology called ISLAM.

            Got ISLAM??

          • Bradford

            Yeah, and in the 1930’s, “we” funded the rise of the Nazi regime, and provoked Japanese Imperialism…
            After we kill all the “Islamic terrorists”, THEN who will our “enemies” be…???…
            Got “ANSWERS”, smart guy…???…

          • juststacey

            Actually, Catholics were persecuted by the Nazis. Obviously not as brutally as the Jew were, but they were still persecuted along with many other religions. There were several Catholic priests imprisoned in Dachau and Oranienburg.

            “It is better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak and remove all doubt.”

            You are a fool.

          • Bradford

            OK, so Stacey thinks I’m a fool…
            SO WHAT…???…
            Yes, and they were not persecuted simply for being catholic, but because they were perceived as threats to the Nazi regime…

          • juststacey

            “It is better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak and remove all doubt.”

            You are a fool.

          • Bradford

            “…ashley110

            13 hours ago

            http://www.wickedlocal.com/pem…”…
            “…I’d rather be a fool for the TRUTH, than to believe the LIES of the “wise”…”…
            Thanks for the quote, Stacy…it shows the pervasive nature of UN-truth…and how so many people can believe something to be “true”, but which is NOT true…Try reading the “questions” link, above…There’s no “conspiracy theory” stuff there, just some legitimate questions which have NOT been answered by TPTB…If what you
            *believe* about Boston Marathon Firecrackers was the TRUTH, why has the “authorities” NOT answered these simple questions…???…
            The truth is out there…

      • juststacey

        These extremists are not Muslims any more than the Westboro Baptist Church are Christians.

        • TeamINFIDEL

          Wrong! The cult ideology of Islam is associated with Islamic terrorism because that is the association that the terrorists themselves CHOOSE to make.

          Since you wish to compare…how many people from Westboro have KILLED on behalf of their church compared to the cult ideology of ISLAM?

          Sure…these people say stupid and vile things, but have they recited bible verses or yelled out “God is great” before they kill? Hmmmm???

          • juststacey

            Maybe not the Westboro whack jobs but the so-called Christians who kill doctors who perform abortions do.

          • TeamINFIDEL

            I love it when muslim apologists bring up abortion bombers. Gee…like I haven’t heard that before!

            You Muslim appeasers who compare crime committed by people who happen to be nominal members of other religions to religious terror committed EXPILICITLY in the name of ISLAM are comparing apples to oranges.

            Yes, some of the abortion clinic bombers were religious (as Muslim apologists love pointing out), but consider the scope of the problem. There were FIVE deadly attacks over a 35 year period in the U.S. Seven people died. This is an average of one death every five years. I will say again…ONE!!

            By contrast, Islamic terrorists have staged over 20,000 documented DEADLY attacks around
            the globe in just the 12 years following September 11th, 2001 for the glory of their allah! That’s right…DEADLY attacks made on behalf of their allah as they yell out “allahu akbar” as these savages (like the Boston Bombers) kill!

            In the last 12 years, there have been perhaps a dozen or so religiously-inspired killings by people of all other faiths (other than ISLAM) COMBINED.

            GOT ISLAM?? You are so busted!

          • juststacey

            I’m not a Muslim apologist. I’m not an anything apologist. I consider myself agnostic leaning towards atheist. I just don’t paint all people and/or religions with a broad brush (except maybe Mormons – I’ve never met a truly rational Mormon and would never trust one based on the ones I’ve dealt with personally).

            REAL Muslims are as horrified, if not more horrified, by acts of terror committed by these criminals who declare themselves Muslims. They condemn them and their actions and make it very clear that the actions of extremists go against the heart and soul of their faith.

            Calling Islam a cult and lumping all Muslims in with terrorists is ignorant and dangerous. Either educate yourself or shut up.

            As the saying goes, “It is better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak and remove all doubt.”

          • TeamINFIDEL

            On all fronts – in the areas of human rights, women’s rights, tolerance, reason, science, progress – ISLAM comes up consistently as one of the most evil scourges to have hit the face the earth.

            ISLAM is not a religion of peace; it is a violent religion. Wherever it rears its ugly head (like in Boston), it creates for oppression, tyranny, and a lowered standard of living.

            If you a person who truly values reason, tolerance, and science would completely and
            unequivocally denounce Islam.

            But you don’t. So, I ask why??

            Perhaps because you do not stand for any of those things.

      • Mo

        You have obviously never read the Quran because no where in its teachings does it say a Muslim will be rewarded for killing or being killed in the name of Islam. This ‘belief’ was completely fabricated by the Taliban and other terrorist groups to justify their killing and to recruit uneducated boys and young men. Education – including your own – is the key to eliminating the ignorance driven hate and prejudices.

        • TeamINFIDEL

          Oh really??

          When you yell out “allahu akbar” and/or recite koranic verses before you kill, that is an ISLAMIC motivated killing in any book!

          BTW…go ahead and blame this islamic cancer on uneducated stupid muslims or whatever…These Boston bombers were NOT uneducated and neither was the Ft. Hood MUSLIM DOCTOR who murdered 14 for your allah.

          What muslim pig nonsense!! This is ISLAM!

  • pff136

    There were no throat wounds that I could see in the main picture with his hands up. When did he get his throat sliced or shot? Just curious.

    • ashley110

      this all you need to watch”http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IwSRB3X1aU8

  • Tracy

    You know why the people in the USA have such bad opinion ISLAM?? Because they keep bombing our innocent people!! If it quacks like a duck, looks like a duck and waddles like a duck, its a freaking duck. If you don’t want to be judged as a terrorist, DON’T ACT LIKE A TERRORIST!! I personally don’t care what color or religion or sexuality you are. I judge people by their actions. Those idiot Baptists that want to keep acting like a bunch of fools at peoples funerals?? IDIOTS! They should be jailed in my opinion. Do i care they are Baptist?? NO! Why do I mention it? Because THEY ARE A BAPTIST CHURCH!! ANY terrorist group out there is out for blood due to their JUDGMENTS of US. Yet you tell us not to judge and shame on us?? I will protect myself, my family and my nation from those that want to attack us because they have judged us poorly because we are not Muslim or live like them or whatever. Do I think we get way to involved in other countries affairs?? HELL YES! But thats not my doing, or my kids or my neighbors or whoever. Countries have armies for a reason. In my opinion, stop acting like a bunch of kids egging someones house, if you think you are big and bad enough, just bring it.

  • Justin Staller

    Fine. PLURAL rotten apples in your hand is not sufficient evidence for the rottenness of all apples. Thank you for your highly relevant and insightful correction.

    The world could learn so much about Islam if it just listened to your wisdom. You’ve clearly done your research… on the internet.

    • TeamINFIDEL

      I have been following this jihad madness since MUSLIMS ruined the 1972 summer Olympics.

      This is NOTHING new! Once you understand the “WHY” behind their madness, then everybody can stop making stupid statements like a “War on Terror” because “terror” is nothing more than a tactic.

      The “WHO” are devoted MUSLIMS and the “WHY” is the cult ideology called ISLAM.

      Got it??

    • TeamINFIDEL

      Glad you agree about “rotten” apples…PLURAL!!

      That’s correct! There are just too many Muslims who taketheir freakin’ quran literally… and too many other “not-muslim-enough” muslims who couldn’t care less about the violence done in the name of theircult ideology called Islam…hence the problem on both ends!

      PLURAL…

  • Real_Girl90

    There was a poll on the page that led here (CBS Boston). Their poll asked if it was good that the photos were released because of public right to see them or did we think it was wrong because it would make Tsarnaev appear as a sympathtic figure and, thus, jeopardize the trial process. The last three on this page are the ones that would make a person see him sympathetically (when he is receiving medical treatment) instead of as the pathetic wretch that he is. The inital photos, though, show him as what he is. A foolish person who sought to make “his point” by hurting others. This young man killed and maimed people for reasons known only to him and his now dead brother. He is no better than every other juvenile, pathetic cretin who does deserve his chance to defend his crime but he has already been tried. Same as so many in the past. Lastly, these same photos will be seen by the public as the trial progresses when they are shown by national media so they just will not have the same shock value later on. That’s all.

    • Chumscrubber

      Presumption of innocence . . .

  • Guest
  • ashley110
    • juststacey

      From someone called sniperkitty. Riiiiiight…

      • Bradford

        Riiiiiiigt, YOURSELF, Stacey…did you follow the link, and see what “sniperkitty” has to say…???…did you follow the LINKS “sniperkitty” provided, and DIG DEEPER…???…
        “Sniperkitty” goes deeper, in different directions than I have been suggesting, but the end result is the same…
        The Tsarnaev Bros. were set up as patsies, and dupes…
        …and the MSM – the LAMEstream media, has NOT told the TRUTH…that’s really all I’m saying, Stacey…

        • juststacey

          I did read it. More asinine speculating. Get a life, all of you.

          • Bradford

            …it can be difficult, even painful, when you begin to realize that not only has most of the TRUTH been kept hidden from you, but also that much of what you THINK you know, is LIES that they told you…

      • ashley110

        it’s alright if you don’t want to look at it but it’s a good explanation and good points

  • TeamINFIDEL

    We need to look at the “WHY?” and motive which drove the Tsarnaev brothers to act and kill.

    When you do that, you find that it is the cult ideology of ISLAM which fuels this madness. After all…in ISLAM, if you fight and die for ISLAM, you are considered the “best” muslim and hence, you are rewarded in muslim paradise with 72 virgins and other nonsense. Their koran is very clear on this matter…and it is literally a license to KILL for their allah.

    Remember what muslim “leaders” are saying about ISLAM:

    “Islam isn’t in America to be equal to any other faith, but to become dominant. The Koran, the Muslim book of scripture, should be the highest authority in America, and Islam the only accepted religion on earth.” — Omar Ahmad, Chairman of CAIR

    Once you understand the WHY behind “good” muslims like the Tsarnaev brothers, then maybe we can defeat this cancer!

  • Woody Box

    Dzhokhar’s bag was not the second bomb. The second bomb exploded a few feet away from where he dropped his bag.

    He was set up.

    http://911woodybox.blogspot.com

    • Yves

      yep and allah was a goat fucker who when no goat available took a miner girl or boy to satisfy his sexual perverted being!

      • Mo

        Do those ‘miner’ girls and boys work in coal mines or iron ore mines. If there is anything perverse here it is your hatred and ignorance.

        • Guest

          the Koran is implemented by a depresive Mohammed who had a wife who had allready met and a young girl (the doughter from another meriage from this woman. In Medina Arabs later referred to as Mohammedists the Koran was one off the first lawbooks say 800 AC! This book is now dictating hate all over the world little hard not to hate sutch peacefull explanation of a religion and book that was implemented for the right reasons, is now used for the wrong ones!

        • Yves

          The Koran is implemented by a depressed Mohammed who had a wife who had
          allready met before and a young girl (the doughter from another meriage from
          this woman). In Medina Arabs cristians an Jews lived there lives together, but it was a lawwless place until koran was written! Fore Arabs later referred to as Mohammedists the Koran
          was one off the first lawbooks say in about 800 AC! This book and mostly it’s followers are now dictating
          hate all over the world, little hard for a infedel not to hate such peacefull
          explanation of a religion and book that was implemented for the right
          reasons, and is now used for the wrong ones!

        • Yves

          All people who believe Allah or God created all this wonders in the world, deny the syntific truth! That states it’s impossible. And Muslims are the living proof this can’t be true cause otherwise they would come to earth and leave islam inm the stoneage say 800 AC!

    • Eric Bergersen

      Because blogs on blogspot.com are such credible sources of information…

  • Dav3id

    who is paying for this coward’s medical bill?

  • Yves

    All people who believe Allah or God created all this wonders in the
    world, deny the scientific truth! That states it’s impossible. And Muslims
    are the living proof this can’t be true cause otherwise they would come
    to earth and leave islam indoors or in the stoneage say 800 AC where it belongs! I don’t mind your believer and need comfort you find in your religion for questions that are not answered by science but don’t bother me or my neighboors with it, let alone trying to make me go to the mosk cause I die lie a worthy infedel trying to free myself from this thing that called faith in god allah or whatever imaginary person or entity!@

    • TeamINFIDEL

      I know how muslims LOVE to bring up what happened a 1,000 years ago…but TODAY, you can’t ignore the painfully obvious!

      ISLAM is in direct contradiction with contemporary knowledge involving and including science, philosophy, ethics, women’s rights, human rights, anthropology, and psychology: the science
      and study of human behavior.

      Judge these people TODAY by their actions (like those jihadist Boston bombers) and their INACTIONS…as this cancer continues to bring holy hell to this earth.

      • juststacey

        Essentially, ALL religion is, not just Islam.

        • TeamINFIDEL

          Sure…haven’t seen any Christians or Jews strap bombs to themselves, recite Bible verses, and then yell out that “Jesus is great” before they KILL lately…as do MUSLIMS who do this nearly EVERY DAY of the freakin’ year for their allah!!

          Hmmmmm????

  • glenn

    please stop the culture of hate,out law guns, introduce this group who are able to kill other humans to a boot camp of values,keep them off our streets ,please help stop male rape and pillage tactics please out law guns take away the right to kill US… glenn

    • TeamINFIDEL

      Sure…how peachy! I have some “CoExist” bumper stickers for you to hand out!

      There, there…feel better??

    • charlie j.

      Outlawing guns is not gonna take the guns out of the criminals hands. You people just don’t get it. How many people who own guns legally are going around killing people for no reason or shooting up schools? Not many, if any, that I can recall. Some kid’s can get access to a family members firearm. I say shame on the family member or person who’s careless enough to let that happen. If any person that owns a firearm legally (especially a gun owner who has children residing with them) doesn’t have enough common sense to have a trigger lock securing their firearm or have it locked in a safe or at least a secure area that only can be accessed by the owner of that weapon.
      That to me is an irresponsible gun owner who should be held accountable & should have his or her privilege to own a firearm taken away.
      It is way way to late to think that by outlawing guns is going to stop the gun violence in this country. Their are far to many firearms & weapons all ready on the streets & in the hands of punks, gang members, psychotic people, etc…
      I watched a documentary on HBO last night & it was about a home invasion that happened in Connecticut in 2007. It was a family of four, the husband was a doctor he had a beautiful wife & two beautiful daughters. I think their ages were 11 & 17. They lived in a nice house in what looked to me to be in a very nice neighborhood in Cheshire Conn. Anyway what happened was this kid was cashing his check at a supermarket & saw a Mother & her 11 yr old daughter shopping for grocery’s. He had a criminal history of robbing houses & apparently this kid also had a thing for young girls so he followed the mother & daughter to their home, he checked out the situation & decided to get in touch with his buddy to plan a home invasion on this defenseless family. I’m going to leave out some of the details to this story to shorten things up but, what they did to this poor family is so disturbing it would make a lot of hard core criminals mad & sick to their stomach.
      They went in & smashed the fathers head open from several whacks from a baseball bat, dragged him to the basement & tied him up & just left him there bleeding from several large lacerations to his head. They then proceeded upstairs where the mom & children were. They tied the girls hands & feet to their beds. After that one man took the mom to the bank to get 15,000 dollars out of their savings account. He told the mom if she said anything her husband & daughters would be killed. She did say something to the bank teller. As she left the bank the bank manager called the police & told them what was happening & she even gave the police a description of the car, the man driving the car & the license plate number. Keep in mind neither one of the robbers were armed with guns. Despite all that, they made it back to the house without being stopped. The mom was taken to her bedroom by one of the men she was strangled to death then he raped her after she was already dead. This same man then went & took that same vehicle to the gas station to fill several jugs of gas because he wanted to burn any DNA evidence that might be left behind. While this man was at the gas station the other man was in the 11 yr old girls bedroom beating her, performing oral sex on this little girl then proceeded to violently rape her. When the other man returned with the gas they then poured the containers of gasoline all over the house & poured it on the girls & their beds while they are laying there tied up & still alive. Just before they lit the house on fire the father in the basement (despite his arms & legs being tied up & being badly beaten managed to shimmy his way up some stairs that lead to the outside bulkhead where he managed to escape to the back yard & yell for help. The men heard the fathers cries, they looked out a window to see what was going on & noticed police officers had the house surrounded. They then ignited the gasoline & proceeded to make their getaway but they were quickly apprehended after attempting to get away in the family car which they smashed into a police cruiser rendering both vehicles useless. As that house burned friends & neighbors said they could hear those poor girls screaming as they were burned alive.
      Come to find out the police were at the scene a half hour before that house was set ablaze. They could have stoped this whole thing from happening. Why they didn’t is a question that anybody & everybody ask’s.
      To get back to the subject of taking away people’s right to bear firearms. The police didn’t help this man & his family when they needed them. So my point is, if this man had a firearm in his house maybe him or his wife could have gotten to it & stoped this tragedy from happening. Do you really think it’s fair to the law abiding citizen to have his right to bear firearms be taken away because we have criminals & mentally ill people out there comitting horrendos crimes with illegal firearms that are already flooding the streets & nieghborhoods in this country? I believe mental illness is not being taken seriously enough in this country & if a person doesn’t have health insurance in this country, forget it. It’s almost impossible for that person to get the help & medication that he needs. It seems like a small step but if those kids who shot those schools up had proper care for their illnesses i believe that some or none of those shootings would have happened. Oh yeah, i forgot to mention, the robber that molested & raped that 11 yr old girl. He was molested by his foster brother when he was very young. Had he had the right care when the warning signs were there, maybe he would’nt have turned out to be the monster that destroyed that family & maybe he too could have lived a normal & happy life? As far as the gangbangers & punks with guns go. The laws need to get tougher on them. Guns don’t kill people, people kill people.

  • ashley110
  • ashley110

    Apparently innocent until proven guilty has been forgotten by some people!!

  • TeamINFIDEL

    The article should have been titled: “The Real REASON of Terror:

    Behind the Scenes of ISLAM…what drove Dzhokhar Tsarnaev and his brother to kill for their allah!”

    • juststacey

      Ignorance in action.

      • TeamINFIDEL

        If we can’t even call out the “WHY?” (cult ideology called ISLAM) and the “WHO?” (“good” muslims) that we are
        fighting along with understanding that a “War on Terror” is their tactic or “HOW?”, then our idiotic PC self-deception will eventually defeat us!!

    • Melissa Carouthers

      innocent till proven guilty is what the usa is founded on so do not judge and what made Catholics kill for god? Muslim do not kill for Allah bad people do so in the name of Allah but they were not tough the right way or have a defect in the head there for you can not judge a group of people by a few bad eggs

  • juststacey

    I said it to someone on this page already and I’ll say it again now.

    These terrorists are no more Muslims than the Westboro Baptist Church are Christian.

    Extremists are extremists no matter what faith they pervert and try to lay claim to. Condemning and entire religion because of a vocal and highly visible minority is ignorant and dangerous and leads to more violence.

    • TeamINFIDEL

      By any chance do you have one of those “CoExist” bumper stickers on your car??

      That must make you feel all nice and warm, right??

      LOL

  • ashley110
  • Yves

    The problem with muslims all over the world; they don’t read they are thought Islam by some selfcalled teacher(professors………lol, only thing they are professor in is fucking there family. Howcome the foam is on there mouth from fanatasism when this self-appointed professor off Islam talks to all this faithfull loving Muslims in the mosk! In Holland they laugh at us for being so stupid, when an Arabic song is playing and it’s hatered propaganda agains the west, they laugh and sing along with all they have; Go back to the dessert and get lost please with your Allah and pedofile Mohammed! They have the attitude they can say everything and don’t offend anyone but on the other hand we can’t say everything cause they feel offended very fast and get violent in the name off pedofiles who are long gone! Since when is feeling offended a privilege reserved for the faithfull Muslims only. Can’t an Infedel feel offended from this Bullshit faith and it’s followers and mostly stupid mideveil preachers! Fuck all Imams stay in your desserts cause the day will come we will overule your midevil thoughts and teaching and bring you to justice!

    • TeamINFIDEL

      Well…we can only hope that more and more muslims are becoming disillusioned with islam. We can only hope that
      they find out that the mechanistic ritual of praying (bang their heads) 5X’s per day, reciting verses that they do not understand (and indeed mean nothing), getting up at taxing hours of the morning and abstaining from food and water until the sunset are not means to becoming more spiritual, but are instruments to control their MIND!!

      These enlightened muslims no more heed to the fear mongering verses of the koran that threaten to burn them and roast them in the “fires of hell” (per the koran) if they dare to think and question the validity of that hate filled book.

      We can only hope they find ISLAM inconsistent with science, logics, human rights, women’s rights, and ethics. Until then…never take your aim off of these people.

    • Melissa Carouthers

      freedom of religion is a right we all have you may not agree with it but i am Muslim and i for one feel that does it matter what name we have for god as long as we have faith not all speak English there for would you hate on a man from japan or India or even Mexico if the name for god was not the same as you. and being brought up in a catholic church as i was let me state that no one knows the true name of god there for hope and faith is all we can have

      • Yves

        freedom off religion is a right you have and I don’t mind any religious person doing so for themselves or in a church as long as they don’t bother me with there faith. I’m atheist to the bone! Why do Musims hate me, I don’t hate or dislike at all. Again being offended is an elevated right for religious peolple now? I feel offended when some Sharia4Holland member call;s the statue off liberty the so called statue off liberty IN AMSTERDAM and thinks enlightment will come in the west by applying sharia law. Thats to bother others with his midevil thoughts I will never admit to this stupidity ass long ass I live and am willing to die for my country and race to obtain and preserve this freedom I have not to believe in any god. No religion is needed for my likings for sure not one who only respects it’s own followers and somehow declares war on all peolple who this different in that manner. Islam is not from this day and age so keep it to yourself!

      • Yves

        for suer your free to believe in whatever midevil book you like but keep it to yourself or chuch mosk whatever building you hide in for the truth! Don’t bother others with YOUR faith. I feel offended when some sharia4holland member states and I quote “we are going to make europe a Muslim state with Sharia law” quote “the so called statue off liberty on the Dam in Amsterdam” meaning that this is not Liberty he has. Quote “sharia law will be enlightment for all atheist cristians and others” Do you have any idear how offended I feel, apart from the fact that both my grandfathers have died for this “so called statue off liberty” When you don’t like the place you live in and the peaple around you you don’t try to change them you go or change yourself lots off Muslims seem to have difficulties iunderstanding this basic principles in life!

  • Yves

    why would you hide when innocent, the Jester is right!

    • Sarah Roberts

      Because he just saw his brother get slaughtered in the street a few hours previous.People that live on the street where the ‘shootout’ took place have posted videos(videos not turned over to the media,or FBI) of the Tsarnaevs yelling out “we give up,we give up…we didn’t do it!”And about the ‘huge hole’ notmymayor is contesting;you should take a look at video on youtube,”Boston SWAT team describes throat wounds as a knife cut”.The other officer’s body language is very telling,when Officer Jeff Campbell describes wound.

    • Melissa Carouthers

      if you were hunted and scared would you not hide? im sorry but if i felt my life was in danger i would hide as well dont say you would walk up to a bunch of men with guns that want to kill you and say here i am take me and book me danO yah ok wouldn’t u fear being shot on the spot

      • Guest

        Letr me tell you this he is lucky I wasn’t one off the people with guns I would have loved to kill thgis son off a Muslim Hole walking around, inbred cockroach is what he is, he should not be alive!

      • Yves

        Let me tell you this; he is lucky I wasn’t one off the people with guns, I
        would have loved to kill this sorry ass son off a Muslim Hole walking around,
        an inbred cockroach is what he is, he should not be alive for all I care! You think those people are running the marathon like to be bombed for some midevil lawbook!?

  • NotMyMayor

    Where is the huge hole in his throat? Does this Facebook page have a point? https://www.facebook.com/pages/Tamerlan-and-Dzhokhar-Tsarnaev-were-framed/277009629018901

  • TeamINFIDEL

    Sure…it is our fault? WWII?? Get real!!

    Go ahead and defend this cult ideology called ISLAM, I shall point out historical facts and the their “holy” texts that fuel this madness for the last 1,400 years.

    Keep in mind that the terrorist mohammad (as this animal was dying) left specific instructions to take the islamic battle against the Christians, Persians and Jews.

    For the next four centuries, Muslim armies steamrolled over unsuspecting neighbors, plundering them of loot and slaves, and forcing the survivors to either convert or pay tribute at the point of a sword.

    “Companions” of the terrorist mohammad lived to see Islam declare war on every major religion in the world in just the first few decades following his death – pressing the Jihad against Hindus, Christians, Jews, Zoroastrians, and Buddhists.

    Got ISLAM??

    • Bradford

      …only in YOUR paranoid, hate-filled brain is it “our fault”…I don’t do “blame”, or “fault”…
      Yeah, Islam was created as a reaction AGAINST Roman Catholicism, that’s why it forbids alcohol, and usury interest, and the selling of “indulgences”, all of which are christian trademarks…And, gee, those “Muslim armies” sound exactly like the Christian Armies…
      GOT Crusades…???…
      You’re only fanning the flames of hatred, war, and, yes, JIHADI-ism…
      YOU are a terrorist victory…YOU empower them…
      I am a terrorist failure. I deny them…
      YOU are who the “terrorists” attack, not me…
      …After we kill all the “Islamic terrorists”, THEN who will “our enemies” be…???…

      • TeamINFIDEL

        I bet you LOVE how your islamic radical buddies are destroying Eqypt and everywhere else this islamic cancer exists!

        Got ISLAM??? Mohammad this buddy!! Right here!! LOL!!

        • Bradford

          …you sound exactly like that crazy, drunk homeless guy who hangs out on the corner, and sleeps under the bridge…you got NO credibility, DUDE…maybe that “islamic cancer” is the best ANTIDOTE to the Christian Cancer…

          • TeamINFIDEL

            Case in point…126 indictments have been handed out in his first two years by our super ultra-liberal Attorney General Eric Holder himself for terrorism.

            And guess what????? Each and every person indicted…has been…a…wait for it…wait for it…a MUSLIM! What a shock!

            Got ISLAM??

          • Bradford

            …and, NO indictments for the “Fast&Furious” scandal…MOST of those 126 “indictments” have been low-level, FBI-compromised DUPES, and PATSIES…most were provided FAKE “explosives” by the FBI, because the “terrorists” were too stupid to get bombs, etc., themselves…MOST of those 126 were NO THREAT to anybody, until the FBI FABRICATED cases against them,…
            You’re fading fast, dude…hatred does have a short shelf-life…

  • Erzsébet Gabriella Czopyk

    I think the protograph deserved a lot of respect publishing these pictures and giving the young peolpe a chance NOT TO MAKE A POPULAR HERO from Tsarnayev. Shame on the publisher who wants to put his face on any newspaper as a cover photo. BUt there is one very embarrasing comment which is “we can only hope that more and more muslims are becoming disillusioned with islam. We can only hope that
    they find out that the mechanistic ritual of praying (bang their heads) 5X’s per day, reciting verses that they do not understand (and indeed mean nothing), getting up at taxing hours of the morning and abstaining from food and water until the sunset are not means to becoming more spiritual, but are instruments to control their MIND” I think NO ONE HAS THE RIGHT TO JUDGE THE REIGION OF OTHERS. READING MORE ABOUT THE HISTORY OF EUROPE can make you sure, there are a lot of bad things made in the name of Jesus too. As a Christian, it’s important to remember, we do not have the right to judge others (do not throw a stone….you understand?) so anybody’s religion can contain starange or even weird parts for the others BUT UNTIL YOU DO NOT HURT OTHER PEOPLE’S FEEELINGS AND FREEDOM, AYOU ARE FREE TO DO WHATEVER YOU WANT. This is a lesson I learnt in the United States, and this is the main reason of my respect to US. So please, do not let make a hero of him and do not make all muslims make guilty because one of them made such senseless and cruel terrorist action. I think simply he is sick, regardless of his age and religion, because no one of us would do such thing and hurt other without a reason. He is just mentally sick.
    As for me personally, I hope to embrace my US friends some day again and if God gives me a power, some day complete therace somewhere in the world. God bless America.

  • Guest

    In 1996, Richard Jewell was suspected of setting off a bomb at the Olympics at Georgia’s Centennial Park, was found innocent later, only later to be vindicated. Richard Jewell stated that the FBI was “in a rush to show the world it could get its man” and that the media “cared nothing about my feelings as a human being”. i am saying he’s innocent or guilty but saying how media can turn person into a monster!!

  • thetruth

    In 1996, Richard Jewell was suspected of setting off a bomb at the Olympics at Georgia’s Centennial Park, was found innocent later, only later to be vindicated. Richard Jewell stated that the FBI was “in a rush to show the world it could get its man” and that the media “cared nothing about my feelings as a human being”. i am not saying he’s innocent or guilty but saying how media can turn person into a monster!!

    • thetruth

      comment below was also made by me but i don’t know how it turned to guest i only fixed the error in this comment

  • Melissa Carouthers

    ok can i ask where the heck the neck cut is as he is getting out of the boat and umm both his hands have damage in them right now from what his mother was told by lawyers one shot and the other had fragments of things in them how the heck did he write if his hands are so damaged ?

  • Bubu Ji Prakash

    George W Bush ordered Mass Murdering of Innocent People and brought war upon Middle east for Oil as his Father did. Obama again a Mass Murderer who allows corporation like Monsanto to poison the People he sworn to serve, Spies on you, breaks all amendments, responsible for killing Innocent lives and further crimes against Humanity, his Country and Planet and you cheer them? And the Masses keep silence because they are all brainwashed by the Media . Yes that Boy may not belong on the Rolling stones cover in that way, so do this President’s aka Criminals who serve the Corporations, not belong on any News Covers but in jail for treason and with them all the Cops who kill innocent People and Corporate Honchos. I am not a Muslim by the way.
    freedom for Manning and parole for Snowden

  • Dustin Rhodes

    Last I check the police stated these photos where given out with out authority. Meaning for these to be up would be copyright infringement.

  • Toni

    Honestly, I found those police photos further humanized Dzhokhar and actually showed a strong side of him. With thousands of police trying to capture him, he emerged so calmly and looked some sort of hero we see in movies. He physically appeared weak but mentally he seemed very strong and very composed. There was no panic in him at all. Guilty or not, this kid is not an average 19 year old.

    • Eric Bergersen

      Quite possibly the least intelligent comment and ludicrous I have ever seen. How is this a strong side of him? A wounded individual crawling out of a boat, then being ventilated by EMTs because he is too weak to even breathe adequately on his own due to his injuries?

      You’re right, he’s not the average 19 year old. Most 19 year olds aren’t mass murderers and terrorists.

      Shame on you for praising and admiring such a depraved individual.

      • Toni

        I was giving my frank opinion on the photos. I don’t see how you can conclude that I admire criminals.

        Instead of criticizing me, why not criticizing the police who released the photos. He shouldn’t have expected all the people to have the same reaction to the photos. Somehow the police thought the photos demonized Dzhokhar but I don’t see any evil in him from those photos and instead I saw a very composed kid. I was simply analyzing his character. It was very rude and shallow of you to judge me like that. I don’t admire criminals, and I don’t admire police officers either. They’re all human beings and human beings do good things and sometimes make mistakes. I guess as soon as the label “terrorist” was embedded in your brain like a tatoo you automatically closed all the doors to further analyze things.

        You’re just afraid to know terrorists are also humans, one of us. I guess the shame is actually on you!

        • Guest

          “With thousands of police trying to capture him, he emerged so calmly and looked some sort of hero we see in movies.”

          So juxtaposing him with a hero we see in movies doesn’t indicate admiration? That’s strange. Most people wouldn’t use the term “hero.”

          At no point did I conclude you admire criminals; I stated that you praised and admired a depraved individual. Let me re-emphasize that for you: individual. Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, “alleged” perpetrator of the murders of four other individuals, and injuring more than 260 others.

          Oh, I know terrorists are humans. I also know that their victims are humans, because I helped treat dozens of them that streamed into the Emergency Department. Maybe someday when you are holding the hand of someone whose foot was mangled by flying shrapnel and whose arterial blood spray stained your scrubs you can talk to me about knowing that terrorists and victims are humans. The label “terrorist” wasn’t imbedded into my brain, it was burned into my eyeballs and seared into my eardrums. I don’t know where you were on April 15th, but it sure as hell wasn’t anywhere near the bombing.

          • Toni

            Sorry that was my honest opinion. If you want to glamorize or downgrade my opinion, be my guest.

            Obviously I wasn’t in Boston during bombing. Also obviously you weren’t in foreign countries where we launched wars which killed or seriously injured many innocent Muslim people. Dzhokhar is our war legacy. He’s not a monster.

          • Eric B

            The only person with glamorous opinions here are you and your “hero” depiction of a murderer.

            Dzhokhar wasn’t in any foreign countries where the US launched wars which killed or seriously injured many innocent Muslim people either. Tsarnaev’s family was busy emigrating to Russia from Kyrgyzstan before petitioning the US for political asylum. Get a grip.

            He’s not a monster. He’s a mass murderer.

          • Toni

            I’m sorry I don’t think you even read any articles or news about him. He believed all Muslims are one body, which means it doesn’t matter which country the Muslims are. If any Muslims are hurt or killed that became his business. Yes, he’s an alleged bomber but that doesn’t mean he can’t have a lovable character. All his family, friends, and teachers appeared to think that way. It is ok if you don’t think the same way.

          • Eric B

            I’ve read plenty about him. In fact, I just described how his family moved between countries and came to be in the US. It’d be pretty hard to do that without reading news or articles about him. That statement seems to be in line with most of your statements: ignorant.

            That’s nice that he believed all Muslims are one body. So if we’re going to apply the lex talionis principle, why draw the line at religion? Why not go down racial lines, or ethnic lines as well? You killed a Serb, so the Serbs should knock off a Croat! What a great idea, that’s not at all how genocide starts!

            What you are describing is misguided and naive vigilante pseudo-justice. I don’t see how that meshes with a “lovable character” at all.

          • Toni

            I analyzed the photos without emotionally being attached to his crime. My opinions on the photos or him are independent of our justice system. By saying he looked human or even heroic I was not judging if he was guilty or not. This is a forum for comments, not a courtroom.

            Just because his alleged bombing didn’t “mesh with” a lovable character I found this case very fascinating.

          • Eric B

            So to clarify, you think that a bloodied person crawling out of a bullet-riddled boat is a lovable character? If you’re basing your opinions just on the photos, of course.

            I find it interesting you’re not emotionally attached to his crime or affected by it, yet you are clearly emotionally attached to the criminal.

          • Toni

            Thousand people may have thousand opinions on the same photo. I’m judging solely based on the photo – which is the topic of this article. Obviously the officer thought the photo itself can tell a lot about this person, and I agree. The only difference is that I have a different opinion than his.

            Similarly in reality I might think some celebrities look hot in a photo but others might think exactly the opposite. Just because I think he/she is hot, doesn’t mean I’m necessarily their fans, and it is no big deal if others don’t agree.

            EVEN IF I’m emotionally attached to someone especially when he’s a criminal, there must be some of his character or some aspect of his life that draws my sympathy. There is no harm in that.

            The courtroom is an appropriate place to judge a person by his crime.

            I certainly feel very sad for the victims in this case but I do feel bad for the suspect too for committing this crime. He could have had a very bright future too.

          • Chumscrubber

            Hey Eric B, how’s about you cease putting words in Toni’s mouth?
            So to clarify, when you have no legitimate rebuttal to an opinion you find unpalatable, you defer to the ad hominem and disinformation? Toni’s statement: “Just because his alleged bombing didn’t ‘mesh with’ a lovable character I found this case very fascinating.” See, what this means, to those of us who have a firm grasp on grammar and the English language, is that because the crime involved failed to indicate a lovable character, which people who knew Dzhokhar described him as possessing, Toni found the case to be fascinating; not that Dzhokhar IS a lovable character or even that Toni feels the photos depict one.
            Not unlike calling a person who has not been convicted of a crime a criminal, you have the audacity to call Toni ignorant while you “accuse” him/her of being emotionally attached to the subject? You are aware that “emotional attachment” is a two-way street, aren’t you? And exactly who the hell do you think you are to render such an intentionally damning assertion based on your own disinformation? Toni’s statement: ” I analyzed the photos without emotionally being attached . . .” Perhaps you should entertain some remedial language courses in written English, the rules of argumentation, and the law.

          • Eric B

            Emotional attachment is most certainly NOT a two-way street; stalking certainly isn’t a two-way street and is the result of a documented attachment disorder.

            Furthermore, that is an exceedingly selective use of quotation marks there, Chumscrubber. You very artfully managed to use an ellipsis to avoid the rest of that quotation: “I analyzed the photos without being attached to his crimes.” Context makes things very different, now doesn’t it?! Hmm…even Toni has convicted him in her mind, if she calls the murders “his crime.” Perhaps you should stop putting words in her mouth as well?

            Although I don’t have to put words in her mouth; to quote from her comments on another article: “He’s like what his friends, family, and teachers described – kind and humble, excellent student with full potential.”
            Source: http://ncronline.org/news/art-media/no-human-monster

            It’s deliciously ironic that you’re referencing argumentum ad hominem as you finish up your post with a personal attack.

          • Chumscrubber

            Again, you can’t resist super-imposing your interpretations onto the statements of others.
            Stalking is your word, not mine. You’ve shown quite clearly that you are emotionally attached to this event; emotional attachment manifests in both positive and negative reactions. “Stalking” has nothing to do with this discussion or the context in which it occurs . . . nice try.
            Furthermore, I didn’t “avoid” the rest of the quotation; I omitted it because it wasn’t germane to her statement about emotional distance from the event. So, no, in this case context most certainly does not change anything, but apparently you think irrelevant semantics do. You’ve mis-quoted Toni, and you’ve drawn a conclusion by cherry-picking a phrase he/she used out of convenience and assigned your own interpretation to; in this context “his crime” most probably is just a convenient reference to “the crime he was accused of”. Re-read the quote you accused me of intentionally truncating, and pay close attention to the phrase “his alleged”. Also, re-read my post; I didn’t put any words in Toni’s mouth, I merely offered a proper grammatical analysis of his/her statement.
            If you don’t have to put words in Toni’s mouth, then don’t. You pull a quote out of context from another article you claim Toni commented on, and you’d like to use it to defend assertions you’ve made in this one, about his/her feelings regarding a “bloodied person crawling out of a bullet-riddled boat”, but your quote references a “kind and humble, excellent student with full potential” . . . brilliant. Again, nice try.
            It appears you’ve gotten your definition of irony from Alanis Morissette, and that you can’t tell the difference between a justified, applicable suggestion and a personal attack.

          • Toni

            Sorry Eric, I really should have put the word “alleged” in front of all the “bomber” or “criminal” word on Dzhokhar in all my comments. I just felt lazy to do that especially when an article already called him a bomber directly, and in that case I might have just go with the flow even though I knew he hadn’t even been convicted. In addition, I didn’t want to use “alleged” word too many times to upset some people here. If I use that word too often, some people would argue why you use “alleged” and why don’t you see there has already been so many evidence. I didn’t want to get into that kind of argument. I just wanted to explain my thoughts on the articles related to the bombing. I leave the judgement in the courtroom. “Alleged” or not is not my focus. I’m more into the social, religion, political, family, and personal factors that could have contributed to this tragedy.

            It is perfectly alright to be emotionally attached to someone. In this case it’s more like sympathizing or empathizing, not attachment.

          • Eric B

            I’m not arguing the social, religious, political, familial, and personal factors that may have contributed to this tragedy. Merely taking extreme offense at the description of this alleged killer of four who also allegedly maimed over 260 others as “look[ing like] some sort of hero we see in movies.”

            But that horse is dead, and I’m done kicking it.

          • Toni

            Sorry if I offended you but I didn’t mean to. My original comment was a reaction to the photos the police released. Apparently he thought the photos could tell the suspect was evil..basically he invited all of us to comment on the photos. Not everybody would agree with the effect of these photos though.

          • Chumscrubber

            You are absolutely correct that the photos were released to invite everyone to formulate their own opinions and comment as they see fit; there is no need for you to apologize for doing so.
            You are not the only one, by a long shot, who thinks these photos elicit a reaction contrary to Officer Murphy’s intentions.
            I agree that the photos make Dzhokhar look vulnerable and hence, humanize him and provoke empathy.

          • Chumscrubber

            Too bad if you’re offended by Toni’s opinion. Again, less emotion, more reason, please.

          • Eric

            Too bad you’ve been offended by mine. Less hypocrisy please.

          • Chumscrubber

            I never stated I was offended by your opinion. When are you going to cease employing the juvenile tactic of cramming words down peoples’ throats to suit your own agenda?

          • Eric

            When are you going to stop using the meaningless and unsubstantiated accusation of “cramming words down people’s throats?”

            It seems we’re at a bit of an impasse.

          • Chumscrubber

            It seems you refuse to deal with the facts and take responsibility for your own statements.

          • Eric

            I took full responsibility for them, and stand by them.

            I was wondering why such vitriolic responses from you, and lo and behold, it makes sense now that you’re a Pakistani Sunni living in Australia. Circling the wagons, eh?

            You also seem to have quite a bit of comment activity on government conspiracy websites. Interesting.

            Now THAT is some ad hominem for you.

          • Chumscrubber

            Desperation is a stinky cologne, Eric B.
            I’m not a Pakistani Sunni, and unfortunately, I’m not living in Australia.
            Are you going to continue to embarrass yourself with your pathetic delusions and juvenile attacks, or have you had enough finally?

          • Chumscrubber

            Are you kidding me? You edited out the portion of your post where you call me a Pakistani Sunni living in Australia? Google “weasel” please.

          • Monkeynuts

            It’s a Google false flag!!!

            Hide yo kids, hide yo wife, they’s googlin’ errybody out thurr!!!

          • Monkeynuts

            Shame!

          • Bradford

            …google: “Craft International”, spend 1/2 hour looking at the “images”, *THEN* come post here…
            ALL the so-called “casualties” were *FAKES*…

          • ohiomom85

            Checked out your suggestions. I don’t see any pics which support what you’re saying. I’m not sure how hundreds of people attending the Boston Marathon could have been part of a huge “FAKE” bombing. What world do you live in?

          • Bradford

            There actually WERE Hollywood-style pyrotechnics…And, I didn’t mean count the spectators, count the “casualties”…*WHERE* are all those “250 casualties”…???…and were they from the first, or second “bomb”…???…Hey, you’re free to believe what you want, but I would rather believe the TRUTH, even if I’m not sure what that is…
            And, do you even CARE about the average 1,000 per MONTH KILLED in sectarian violence and bombings in Iraq, still going on today?…The Global military-industrial-entertainment-pharmaceutical-etc Complex is VAST and RICH, and it controls most of the media…It cares ONLY about money and power, but it is not as much in agreement as you might think…I live in a world of 10 – 20Billion people living in peace, prosperity, and harmony…Our only real “enemies” are hatred, ignorance, fear, greed, etc….

          • Chumscrubber

            Your grasp on the meaning of the word “irony”, is about as good as Alanis Morissette’s in the tune “Ironic”. Sorry the reference went over your head.

            Apparently, you can’t illustrate a concept with proper examples. Perhaps substituting “attachment” with “involvement”, which is closer to the contextual meaning of the phrase would assist you. Refer to Toni’s statement: “In this case it’s more like sympathizing or empathizing, not attachment.”
            I never stated that in every instance the “two-way street” hosts traffic in both directions, between two individuals, but that both positive and negative emotions qualify as “attachment”. In this particular instance, you are clearly emotionally attached to this event and ensuing discussion. Absolutely nowhere does Toni profess an emotional attachment to Dzhokhar; you assert that she does for your own bullying self-interest.

            You misquoted Toni’s statement within this article: “I analyzed the photos without being attached to his crimes.” Her statement was: “I analyzed the photos without emotionally being attached to his crime”, and she busts you on your context objection diversion, just like I did, below. Do you know what the phrase “word-for-word transcription” means?
            Toni’s comment within another article is irrelevant to the present discussion. You have transplanted it into this discussion from another, therefore, you literally have taken it out of context! Furthermore, learn how to read English properly, please; they were not Toni’s feelings or words about Dzhokhar. Toni quoted what people who knew Dzhokhar said about him, so they were in fact, someone else’s words!

            Toni stated that the seemingly contrary portrayals of Dzhokhar led her to be fascinated with this case. I validated her statement, without having to deviate from the entire article. Exactly what point have I failed to grasp, and what is yours, other than to parrot Toni’s, as if it is your own adroit observation?

            Google “projection” please.

          • Monkeynuts

            ZOMG

          • Toni

            Hi Chumsrcubber, I appreciate that you seem to be always on my side like a shadow, but I’m not used to it- give me some space :).. If you want to present your own views here, state them straightforwardly. Do not always quote my comments. I can handle my comments by myself. Please don’t take any offense here. Thanks.

          • Chumscrubber

            Hi Toni. Quite frankly, I object to your hyperbolic characterizations.
            Actually, if you review my posts, you’ll find that most of them directly reflect my own views, and if nothing else, are presented straightforwardly. Almost all of the posts to which you refer, were directed at Eric, not you in fact.
            I am not “always on YOUR side”, we just happen to be on the same side of the core issue being discussed, which really has only two sides; either the photos make Dzhokhar look sympathetic, or diabolical, so the fact that we both fall on the sympathetic side, isn’t exactly a unique scenario (as I commented). Eric happened to be disagreeing with you in the same space I was disagreeing with him, and again, our opinions happen to fall on the same side of the argument. It wasn’t about you per se, but about Eric emotionally and inaccurately attacking the commenter, rather than rationally addressing the reasoning behind an accurate account.
            I do not “always quote your comments”; the meaning of your statements and the precise wording of them was called into question because Eric was warping your statements to denigrate your position in order to support his indirectly. He’s done the same with mine. Instead of objectively dealing “straightforwardly” with the facts, he attacked your comments on a personal level, and continued to divert attention to your statements as the the archetype of the counterpoint, so your comments kept getting dragged into the discussion, and I responded in kind. He did the same thing with mine.

            I’ve probably posted four times the amount of comments within this article than you’ve seen, and none of them remotely involve or reference you. When you post comments in an interactive blog, you run the risk of having other commenters reply to, and reference your posts in ways you might not wholly approve of; deal with it, as I have, and don’t presume to instruct me to somehow subvert the inevitable while showering yourself with unwarranted flattery, please. Please don’t take any offense here. Thanks.

          • Toni

            No problem. I got it. Thanks.

          • Laiba Noor

            toni i thnk you support muslims??? nd i appericiate.. u hv broad minded nd hv kind heart.. it shows the moral values of humanism..!!!!

          • Monkeynuts

            We gon find you!

          • Chumscrubber

            Presumption of innocence . . . presumption of innocence . . . now take a deep breath, get off your indignant, self-righteous high-horse, and get a grip yourself. To qualify as a “mass murderer”, one must kill at least four people at one location in a single event. So who ever is proven to have committed this atrocity, they aren’t a mass murderer. Less emotion, more reason, please.

          • Eric B

            Oh, I’m sorry, I don’t subscribe to the FBI definition of mass murderer. I’m sorry, Officer Collier; you don’t count because you were killed three days after the Tsarnaevs allegedy murdered three other people. I’m sorry to the numerous victims of amputations, prolonged rehabilitations, permanently altered lifestyles and emotional well-being. The people who tried to kill you don’t count as mass murderers, they didn’t get enough of you. Chumscrubber, you’re shameful.

          • Chumscrubber

            Hell of an apology. Again, less emotion, more reason, please. You’re embarrassed because you prematurely declared Dzhokhar guilty and asserted an incorrect designation, so you go off on a rant, attribute the contents of YOUR rant to me, and then shame me for them . . . now that’s shameful. You have a nasty, pathetic habit of cramming your words down other people throats, Eric B. Learn how to argue within the confines of civility, please. Hint: when one party employs the ad hominem fallacy, they concede the position they are advocating.

          • Eric B

            I wasn’t a political science major in college; forgive me for not knowing the professional intricacies of twisting words to one’s own benefit.

            I’m not embarrassed I’ve declared him guilty, and I’m well aware I’m ignoring due process. I don’t have to provide due process, I’m not the legal system. He will get the fair trial he deserves, and he will doubtless spend the rest of his life in jail without the possibility of parole; the death penalty is frankly too light of a punishment (and not very cost-effective either).

            Again, the ironic and hypocritical personal attacks.

          • Chumscrubber

            Twisting words to one’s own benefit is a matter of juvenile practice, not “professional intricacies” (I took the liberty of correcting your misspelling of intricacies).
            No one stated that you have to “provide” due process or that you were the legal system; as a law abiding American citizen you are morally and legally bound to respect due process. lest you advocate, in your own words “misguided and naive vigilante pseudo-justice”. You use the term “hypocritical” . . . interesting.
            Google “irony” please, and, criticisms of exhibited shortfalls in the structure and content of your personal arguments do not constitute personal attacks.

          • Eric B

            “You have a nasty, pathetic habit of cramming your words down other peoples’ throats, Eric B.” is not a criticism of exhibited shortfalls, it’s a rude personal opinion.

            I did not misspell intricacies, and “misspell” is not hyphenated.

            My opinions are not morally and legally bound to respect due process. I am very much entitled to my own opinions. And quite frankly, I’m more than sure you will see my opinions vindicated upon the conclusion of Tsarnaev’s trial.

          • Chumscrubber

            Sorry, but you’re wrong. You went on a rant, then used the content of your own rant to justify the accusation “Chumscrubber, you’re shameful.” Ergo, my critical statement was one of fact, not opinion, and you are the one who expressed a “rude personal opinion”.
            You originally spelled intricacies, “intracacies”; yes, the edit button is your friend, and the hyphen is considered optional, but what hyphen?
            No one said you aren’t entitled to your opinions, but if your opinions aren’t going to be respectful of such basic principles as presumption of innocence and due process, particularly when you reference “naive, vigilante pseudo-justice”, you should be prepared to get called out on your hypocrisy and have your opinions challenged.
            I haven’t commented on what I think the outcome of Tsarnaev’s trial might be, and I have no interest in doing so.

          • Eric

            Mmm I didn’t edit it, but sure. If correcting nonexistent misspellings is your thing, then go for it.

            I haven’t been advocating for any justice or sanctions to come to Tsarnaev, so I don’t have to worry regarding bringing about any “naive, vigilante pseudo-justice.” I’m not arguing about justice. This argument started due to the comparison of Tsarnaev to a movie hero.

            Frankly, you’re a deliberately irritating contrarian who has driven the debate so far off the tracks that it’s practically worthless at this point.

          • Chumscrubber

            Perhaps you should learn to take responsibility for your own statements, don’t start arguments you don’t have the stomach to finish, and learn to graciously admit when you are wrong.

          • Monkeynuts

            SAVE DZHOKHAR

          • Bradford

            …wrong…the Tsarnaevs are being set up by the FBI as dupes and patsies….*IF* there was an actual bomber, it isn’t one of the Tsarnaev Bros…
            Why has the FBI killed 2 of 3 “suspects”…???…
            I just checked – *WHY*, if you google”Craft International”/images, are there SO MANY photos showing how they set up the Boston Marathon Firecrackers…???…Personally, I don’t believe anybody was killed April 15…not at the Boston Marathon, anyway…

          • Monkeynuts

            Caution: Wackos abound.

          • ohiomom85

            Tell this to the people who lost limbs in the bombing. Attempted murder is still a crime in the U.S.

          • Bradford

            I bet you can’t find even ONE “amputee” who can claim whether it was the first, or second “bomb”…
            The most famous “amputee”, Baumann in the wheelchair pushed by Arredondo, lost both his legs below the hip in an IED attack in Iraq…prosthetics were fitted OVER his stumps, to simulate amputations AT the knee…
            Where’s Arredondo NOW?…Baumann?….
            All the “amputees” were ALREADY amputees BEFORE the Boston Marathon Firecrackers…
            Remember Kent State?…The Gov’t lies…

          • Chumscrubber

            Good for you Toni; don’t succumb to the Pavlovian propaganda.

          • Eric B

            Ah yes, Pavlovian propaganda! Divulge the truth for us, depart from the herd, you’re not a sheep! Good for you, it must be so much fun to be a contrarian and accuse everyone else of ignorance and go from sheep to shepherd. Disgusting.

          • Chumscrubber

            The lady doth protest too much. I didn’t accuse anyone of anything; I praised Toni for not succumbing to the Pavlovian propaganda. The term ‘Pavlovian propaganda’ denotes a rhetorical tactic, not a biological entity. Ergo, I did not accuse anyone, let alone “everyone else” of anything. What is disgusting, is your own practice of cramming your self-serving assertions down other commenters’ throats. Less emotion, more reason, please.

          • Eric B

            No, I was referring to your numerous other comments on other articles viciously castigating the “sheeple” and “following the herd.”

          • Chumscrubber

            Incredible. You reply directly and inappropriately to one comment, and when called out, you then claim you are responding to “numerous other comments” from different articles, which you fail to reference. Please google “context”.
            Here’s a novel idea, how about correlating the content of your reply to the comment you are replying to? See, that’s why the “reply” option appears directly beneath every comment. if you’d like to reply to any other comment I’ve made in this article or any other, follow proper protocol and go to that specific comment and click on “reply” directly beneath it, so an exchange can occur in proper context. It isn’t rocket science . . .

          • Eric B

            Apologies, it was actually your comments on this article, but from 12 days ago. It’s in your comment feed, but there are no direct links to your comments except to link to this article and dig back 12 days. Which is thousands of comments deep, and not worth my time to do. Rather, in the name of efficiency, I mentioned it here.

            I’m sorry I deviated from your proper protocol master, please don’t beat me. It must’ve inconvenienced you oh so much.

          • Toni

            It’s weird. I found both of you adorable. Again, just my opinion :) I’m off to bed.

          • Eric

            Hahaha I’ll take it.

          • Chumscrubber

            Again, quite the apology.
            It isn’t MY protocol, but common, accepted practice in every blog on the web, and is a product of simple common sense.
            I never remotely claimed to be your master, or made a single reference to beating you, or inconvenience either; they are all your melodramatic diversions.
            You couldn’t challenge the statements before you, so instead of just leaving them alone, you went digging elsewhere for a statement you thought you might be able to successfully negatively criticize, from another discussion and context that didn’t even involve you, from 12 days ago? Priceless . . .

          • Monkeynuts

            Chumscrubbing!

          • Bradford

            …you say you “helped treat dozens”…I say BULL-oney…why are there NO photos of these “dozens”…???…I keep seeing the same 1/2 dozen or so *FAKED* “injuries”…

          • Monkeynuts

            Smells like ignorance!

        • Monkeynuts

          One too many?

        • Disavowed 1

          Toni. Heres my frank opinion. Your a bald face liar.. .Nice emotion stirring story. But the DHS already admitted Iin the Boston Globe the staged the event jackazz. Your part of the crime against your fellow Americans perpetuating this lie. For shame!

          DHS admitted it was their drill. Steven Spielberg was one of the EMS responders for crying out loud! He event admitted to it.

      • Chumscrubber

        Shame on you for ignoring the presumption of innocence and due process.

      • Philip Osborne

        If you actually read the comments before getting all irate about them, Toni was not judging the boy, she was judging the photos. She said that in these photos he APPEARED almost heroic – she never said he WAS heroic, nor that she agreed with the impression given by the photos … but the juxtaposition the photos create of an enormous military mission against a single wounded young lad standing calmly before them give the IMPRESSION of strength. That was what Toni was saying – she didn’t say that she agreed with the impression, or that it was an accurate representation of true events, she just said that was how it LOOKED in these particular photos.

        I happen to agree with her … regardless of what we do or don’t know about him outside of these photos … just purely looking at the photos, these ones make him look just as heroic (if not more) as the ones in Rolling Stone, so they don’t really counteract the effect of those other photos!

    • emerald98

      Hero, no. Maybe you watch too many movies. That was calm, that was I have been shot and wounded and I am going out my mind, with little thought to anything but relieving his pain. How would you even know his mental state – and guess him waking up and crying for two days show a hero or a calm guy. Of course he no tan average teenager, on one respect, most teens don’t follow their psychopathic brother down the road of destruction. Let’s be clear, only cowards blow up innocent people, instead of getting their message across in a peaceful way. You can believe him innocent, but you and all others will be wrong. There is no way possible for the FBI to leak so much info and not have it be true. Besides, this is America and we love to uncover truth..and the world is watching, so we shall all see how this will not got to trial, he will get a plea deal with life in prison – and with that ruin all his hopes and plans of dying a martyr but little old man. It’s quite a shame that he did not see his religion as a peaceful religion like the majority do, but they say you bring your own personal attitudes to religion, and if you are full of anger, resentment and violence, the you gravitate to that part, the Jihad part. Not once did he mention the fact that Muslims are killing each other all the time, in the Middle East in Chechnya and Dagestan. So his argument is seriously flawed, Linzi Lui, the student from China was not an American citizens, so again their plan is flawed. No they both were looking for something to direct their rage on, and if they couldn’t do in in Dagestan against the Russians, well America is on the Jihad hit list, so let’s do that. I will go even further and say that Tamerlan may have been involved in the Waltham triple murder, so this may be leverage to help him stay away from the death penalty, it also is sign of just how arrogant that Tamerlan was, and his ability to kill. It’s quite possible they thought they could get away with it like he may have the other Waltham murders. It will all come out and we may never hear all the details until the records are released. There is no way this is going to trail, Judy Clarke said it’s sure way of getting him the Death Penalty, have 12 people decide his fate. No, she will present him with all the evidence against him and ask what he wants to do, cop a plea – that is if there is anything he has that the Feds want. Yet, if you are still unsure about his guilt, then ask him why he gave this lawyers authorization to tell one of his closest and long-term friend that he ran over his brother at the shootout by accident as he was trying to run a blockade. This clearly means he was there in a stolen SUV and throwing explosives, one a pressure cooker bomb. And the dots connect all the way back to April 15 and the Boston Marathon. In today’s world we leave our whereabouts on everything, in our cells, computers, video footage and eyewitnesses, so by now Judy Clarke knows the case is compelling, so much she is asking for another DP lawyer to help comb through all the files of evidence. So no, he is far from calm or anything else.

      • Toni

        Hey… if you read my follow-up comments when replying to other people, I emphasized many times that I don’t know if he’s guilty or not. Maybe you’re the police who caught him. You sound like they already presented a lot of evidence to you. But to me, I was judging solely based on the news articles. Not everybody was affected by the photos the same way the police expected.

        Due to the overwhelming evidence that Police said they collected, this case seriously doesn’t look good on the suspect. As for the religion, I think most people in this country don’t care to know about Muslims – we just expect them to integrate to this culture automatically. For many Muslim people, their political views are often worldwise, not just restricted to this country. It seems, to them religion always comes first and which country they live in doesn’t really matter, and they all want to visit Mecca someday. When talking about our US government they tend to be on the defense side – which is understandable because looks like all terrorist acts were conducted by Muslim people. In their inner world I believe they struggle a lot, like Dzhokhar. I’m not surprised if they don’t trust our government. Some of them are mature enough to divert their attention to something else rather than politics but some may be still struggling. Having an older brother like Tamerlon surely sent Dzhokhar straight to the death penalty. Many of us here are just lucky that we don’t have a religion that we have to struggle to defend.

        I judged Dzhokhar’s charater from the photos and from other news articles regarding his life. He’s not a weak kid, actually mentally very strong or even stubborn. He probably believed what he did was for a good cause. To him, maybe it doesn’t matter if the victims are US citizens or not, as long as the bombing was on US soil he felt he had achieved his purposes. And again, all what I’m saying here are just my speculations – one possibility, not necessarily facts. I leave the judgement to the courtroom.

        And maybe you’re right. I might have watched too many movies. But that doesn’t change the reality. If he’s found guilty then he’ll go to jail probably for the rest of his life.

        • 5Herb7

          You can say he is “mentally very strong or even stubborn.” I would categorize his actions more as weak minded and stupid. He pissed away his entire life and accomplished nothing but to injure innocent men, women and even children. Yeah he showed those little children that he injured that he was a real tough guy. We let the bastards come over here to escape persecution from their own country and they thank us by stealing from our stores and killing innocent people. Screw this punk. What ever his punishment, it will be less than he deserves.

      • Anonymous

        Hahahahaha. I’ll fight for you until you wake up.

    • Monkeynuts

      !!!

    • disqus_w9c6NF37lV

      That’s for sure! Your average 19 year old does not blow up innocent people watching a foot race.

  • AL

    I wonder if what are behind those lenses. I presume that the media is trying to put a huge chunk of their stories into our minds so as it looks like its the gist of what really happened. These photos obviously shows that Dzhokhar/Jahar is deeply wounded and if they(the police) are trying to beat him more, then I’m looking at so many monsters here.

    • Monkeynuts

      Conspiracies!

  • Mat Wilson

    So when are the real terrorists going to be arrested?

    http://hockeylegends.cc/who

    • Ahmed Ayman

      woooow i am shocked

  • mikebyrnes

    Photos show he was a big tough killing machine until he was surrounded – then the coward came out slowly so he would live. I hope he gets shanked in prison

  • ohiomom85

    My first time to see these. We have to remember that the law enforcement officers could see heat (knew Tsarnaev was there), but couldn’t see everything in the boat. He could have strapped explosives to his body (typical terrorist action). They were risking their own lives, and then actually saved his. Had he stayed in that boat bleeding, he would have died.

    He would not have had this chance in many other countries. I believe their actions to save his life show the “innocent until proven guilty” side of law enforcement far more than any other facts.

    And let us not feel sorry for him, simply because he was shot in the face. He received those wounds while trying to kill law enforcement officers. His actions show cowardice, not bravery.

    • Daria

      You forgot to say from whose actions his there were these wounds. Because it could be a shahid belt, they do not have to shoot at it – to prevent the explosion. In addition, the boy was unarmed, and they shot at about an hour into it – you call it heroism?

  • Daria

    You feel sorry for the victims of bombings, why you do not have a drop of regret to the young man, whom you call “guilty.” You shout about democracy and human rights, and at the same time you’re like vultures pounced on the boy, whose guilt has not been proved. For all written and unwritten laws – he’s innocent. However, he was already suffering. Suffers from many, many injuries. Suffers from the loss of his brother. He suffers from separation from family. Suffers from a general hatred.

    Let’s be honest – you really do not care who bombed. You pleased with the fact that you were given. Because if you were not indifferent, if you really want to understand, you would have asked for a moot point, for every lie behind every conflict. But you are silent. You can only curse the helpless boy. And forgive me, but I despise you for it.

    And yes, I’m sorry for my English.

    • J_S_N

      Well put Daria,

    • Katharine Davis

      I agree, Daria.

  • bb

    I don’t see how these pictures portray Jahar as “EVIL”?

  • bb

    He looks like a kid who is tired of running scared and decides he’s had enough. If anything it shows Jahar had no weapon and was not laced with explosives!

  • bb

    I pray for the victims but I truly believe this kid had nothing to do with the bombings in Boston. There is 0 evidence linking him to this aside from 2 photo shopped pictures. One showing him running from the scene without his back pack and one showing his backpack at his feet. What I find interesting as well is that in every photo of him Jahar has the exact same expression on his face??

    • eat my shit

      Really? You’re just another opinionated dumb ass, bb. If he wasn’t guilty, why run? Why not stop, engage law enforcement quickly, and say “not me”? I’m truly amazed at the number of incredibly stupid people that post in these forums. Frankly, if he’s not guilty, he’s dumb enough that Darwinism should claim him anyway. ’nuff said.

    • JD

      How do you explain their well executed gun battle with the cops earlier in the hunt? That looked like a well planned effort.

      • martha

        that’s true and the cop they kill and the guy they kidnap.

        • bb

          The cop was killed by friendly fire.
          fire.

      • bb

        The only proof Jahar was at the gun battle was when he screamed out “We didn’t do it!” and “Chill out chill out!”. Where is the police video of them even shooting back at the cops? All I could hear was round after round after round from hundreds of cops on 2 kids that were yelling back to chill and we didn’t do it. Seems a little fishy to me.

  • thetruth

    ****radical extremists are proud of their actions and more than happy to die for their cause. In fact, they WANT to be killed because in their head, they will be martyrs that go to heaven. they don’t hide in a boat and wait for police to catch them!i never heard of a terrorist hiding and running for his life after committing an act of terrorism. after the attack they went back to their normal lives, they could leave this country or flee out of the country but they didn’t! they faces were on the biggest news networks what were they suppose to do, not run! there are 9,000 officers are following you, whole country hates you, THEY GAVE them no choice, they were FORCED to flee, they were already labeled as terrorists MONSTERS..our enemies. if the police didn’t kill them , somebody form the general public more than likely would have. THEY NEVER HAD A CHOICE! will you people stop listening to news and look at real facts! if they did this i wanna SEE THE Proof , if they can release pics of the shootout, why can;t they release the footage of them placing the bags? what taking them so long? it’s been more than 3 months! some people are already considering him as the terrorist and he’s NOT even proven guilty yet! i believe in “INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY” he has a sniper laser beam pointed at the dead-center of his forehead but he has his hands up to surrender and is clearly showing no threat, and just the fact that the police brutality went this far is insane. all i see two guys wearing bags, walking around. they were not the only ones with the backpacks they were thousands of people with backpacks. both exploded bags were black but jahar has white backpack and tamerlan had grey backpack. it was reported by authorities that there were 5 bombs there that day(YOU DON’T KNOW THIS BECAUSE YOU DON’T PAY ATTENTION TO REAL FACTS) that one of the exploded backpacks exactly matched that of one of the Navy Seals/Craft International security personnel working the Marathon that day.jahar and tamerlans DNA DID NOT MATCH ON THE pressure cookers but it match with FEMALE DNA. you will still winder how he got that neck wound when police were the only one shooting at him. that day Boston Globe tweeted about “bomb drills” and “bomb squad activities” the day of the marathon, with one of the tweets being sent in close proximity to the time when the actual bombs were detonated

  • Gabriele Urbanik

    Why so many terrible things and death for Tsarnaev? Why not for James Holmes? He kills more people. I can not se terrible wishes for him.

  • Gary J Worth

    Is anyone going to answer the question as to why the police shot hundreds of rounds into the boat at a target they couldn’t see, when they had instructions to take Tsarnaev alive in order to determine if there were more bombs out there? It’s just luck that they didn’t kill him. That’s not a professional police force.

    • Debbie Geiger

      What if he had hurt or killed some of your family members in Boston? You might not feel so hard at the police or anyone else for capturing this man in any manner they could.

      • Philip Osborne

        Key word in that sentence was IF … he has so far not been proven either guilty or innocent … therefore anyone commenting on here is only passing opinion because NONE of us KNOW if he is guilty or innocent!

        In the meantime, as Gary was making the point, even if he was guilty, the police were instructed to take him alive SO THAT THEY COULD FIND OUT ABOUT MORE BOMBS … if the police had succeeded in killing him as they seemed intent on doing despite him being unarmed at the time, then there was the possibility that even more family members in Boston could have been hurt or killed by additional bombs.

        A comment on the poor policing should not be taken as declaring Tsarnaev’s innocence … it’s quite possible that both he was guilty AND that the police did a bad job – the two are not mutually exclusive!

    • Peter

      You must not be from Boston. We are proud for the way Local and State did there Job.

      • ladybird

        Oh yeah, they rounded up a suspect. One that was predetermined and they won’t answer any difficult questions like who were the men on the roof? What about the bomb drill that was scheduled for that day? Why is the color of the back pack differant? Why do thier filmed versions differ so much from bystanders? Why are witness accounts not being looked at? Why, because they want him to die for this. Guilty beyond a shadow of doubt doesn’t mean much anymore. Many have him labeled as guilty already. Can we really let a man die if we are not 100% sure ? I’m not placing my faith in the police. Too many things are too wrong

    • martha

      they didn’t shot at the boat at all, they did a great job.

      • bb

        Wrong…There were hundreds of round found in the boat. They were trying to kill him! I truly think he wasn’t the guy they saw in court-I think he was executed! That was what they were trying to do when they fired round after round into that boat!

    • bb

      I agree 100% Gary!! When was the last time you saw a whole city on lock down, martial law brought in and rounds fired into a boat at a child who was unarmed?? NONE OF ANY OF WHAT HAPPENED MAKES SENSE TO ME?!! I am afraid of our Government if they can do something like this and no one hold them accountable?? They could do this to me, to you to anyone! There is hardly one shred of evidence linking this kid to what happened!! There is a lot more evidence linking the Boston police, The military and our own FBI-to this!

      • https://twitter.com/ronwordwelder Ron Wordwelder

        I suspect the entire event was designed to test public response to a lockdown. Sadly, despite continued awakening evident in internet comments, many cheered and chanted their approval of fascism.

  • Gary J Worth

    You might want to re-read my comment. You all missed the important point….they needed him ALIVE in order to find any more bombs and to save more lives! It’s only dumb luck that he was. And no, I’m not from Boston but I’m a former cop.

  • Ahmed Ayman

    as a muslim i am really sad to see this boy do that to himself and to the other people,islam didnt teach us to kill the people but some extremist ignorants dont know the meaning of islam and distort the image of islam by their actions.

    • nickk

      he didn’t do it

      • Ahmed Ayman

        i saw the video which say he didn’t do that but i am not sure until now anyway we all feel sorry for all the victims

  • Cynthia

    The more I live this life the less I believe from the government and media. I’m not making a judgment call on whether this young man is the Boston bomber or not. I hope that all comes out in a court of law. I’m also not saying whether I believe the police responded appropriately or not. Unfortunately we have seen too many law enforcement officers abuse their power and give a bad name to the field. I’m withholding judgment until a criminal trial, with evidence, has been conducted. I simply say this: I am glad the young man is alive. I would hate to be questioning whether he really committed this crime and was killed in the process. I grieve for the families that lost loved ones and for the families that are now taking care of their wounded loved ones. I also feel for the family of this young man and his deceased brother. It just seems to be at this point we should be withholding judgment and waiting for justice to take its course.

  • bb

    He ran because they were being hunted, set up as patsies. Do a little research. I took this whole thing at face value until I started to look into it a little more. Where is the video? The video of them throwing bombs at police, the video of them shooting at police? Why would the feds not answer questions about the bomb drill? Why were we told not to consider any pictures but the ones they showed us as credible?? A lot of unanswered questions-still unanswered. Doesn’t matter anyway, we’ll never know the truth. I truly believe that there is a lot more to this than any of us will ever know. A throat wound?? When did this happen? When he came out of the boat his throat was fine. Too many unanswered questions e m s.

  • http://www.bartleyridgecondo-sg.com/ Bartley Ridge

    What an awesome way to expilan this-now I know everything!

  • Get real

    Some people are flat out delusional , Some ask where did he get the neck injury i don’t see it when he’s getting out of the boat. look at the photographs the sweater is covering up his neck and look at the photo where there giving him oxygen , they have a compress on a neck wound. There is nothing heroic by the way he looks coming out of the boat , he looks tired worn out and depressed that he got caught. The video of the trigger being thrown , look at it a bomb just went off and it looks more like a piece of concrete landing out in the street , really people. People on here are criticizing the officer for releasing these photos but then turn around and want to see the shootout videos for proof that it was this kid throwing bombs and shooting at the cops going through the streets. Can’t have it both ways. A lot of people want to think everything is a conspiracy but sometimes there’s just bad people in the world that do bad things.

    • Scott Carriere

      Name ONE. Name one just bad person. Can you? Name one that wasn’t part of the global government plan? Name 1!!!

      • Fred Fergueson

        @Scott its good to see that people really ARE waking up to the true ridiculousness of it, even in such a random place as this that i just happened to stumble upon…maybe there really IS hope and we really WONT allow ourselves to be blown all up AGAIN…

        • Charl Chapman

          Lots of paranoid delusionals——

          • Lux Vexillifer

            yep you certainly are…fortunately you will be alive to see the destruction of this entire paranoid delusion called “Society” right in FRONT of you. till then, go have another Coke.

    • Cory Koff

      Sorry I met both Tam and Dzhokhar while their ARE bad people in the world these 2 are not those people.

  • Joske Vermeule

    yeah right.. this entire thing was a set up
    you kan smell a fals flag from 10.000 miles

  • Johney Duke

    Enormous blog you individuals have made there, I entirely appreciate the
    work.,.,bubblegum
    casting reviews

  • James Bond Bond

    Definitely why you get thus several blog comments.
    wedding invitations

  • Peetr

    Enormous website along with attractive and exclusive materials whatever you need.
    Recommended Reading

  • Peetr

    Great blog you people have made here on this blog site, I will absolutely appreciate your workRecommended Site

  • Feonacy Tyson

    Inconceivable points. Sound arguments. Keep going the truly amazing work.

    rent car jakarta

  • band hock

    I
    actually found this blog and that is amazing thing I enjoy reading this easy
    to understand stuff. Keep it up.
    testicular
    cancer

  • albert mark

    It’s an
    outstanding article in favor of all the web guests; they will get benefit
    from it I am confident.
    resume
    tips 2012

  • alaanile

    I pray for the victims but I truly believe this kid had nothing to do with the bombings in Boston. There is 0 evidence linking him to this aside from 2 photo shopped pictures. One showing him running from the scene without his back pack and one showing his backpack at his feet. What I find interesting as well is that in every photo of him Jahar has the exact same expression on his face??

    اضغط هنا

    اضغط هنا

  • alaanile
  • daniel wilson

    This was a hyper-realistic drill. It was a good way to use some equipment and move around some money.

  • felyhely

    Hi, just essential
    you to know I have added your site to my Google bookmarks due to your latest
    and inspiring information.
    Health
    Insurance Fort Lauderdale

  • John12

    Your style is so
    exclusive compared to other individuals. Thank you for posting when you have
    the chance, guess I would just make this bookmarked.
    Health
    Insurance Starke Florida