Master Plan

BSA president-elect Tim Love talks architecture, planning, and the future of Boston.

Tim Love BSA President

Photograph by Jared Leeds

There is perhaps no one with as keen an eye for urban planning and architecture in Boston as Tim Love. The Harvard GSD graduate is a founding principal of the local design firm Utile. He’s an associate professor of architecture at Northeastern, where he’s constantly dreaming up ways to keep the degree relevant. And in December he’ll take over as president of the Boston Society of Architects, a membership-driven nonprofit dedicated to industry professionals. Here, the South Boston resident shares some of his plans for the organization, the city, and the future of design.

So what’s going on with City Hall? I heard there was a redesign in the works.

My firm developed a design concept and it was humming along until the mayor announced he wasn’t going to run again, so it’s a little static right now. The general idea was to not radically rethink City Hall Plaza—I believe every place that has a history has meaning, especially civic spaces. We decided the best thing would be to do what the Red Sox have done with Fenway Park. They’ve made little improvements over time without changing the most characteristic elements. So we proposed keeping the brick paving but adding a dense row of trees along the edges, like a canopy, to make the events that happen there feel more intimate. We’d also like to create a passive rainwater-retention system and reduce the amount of overflow into the harbor, simultaneously making the plaza more accessible to the disabled and elderly. We’re hoping that City Hall Plaza can be a national model for how a civic space can also serve as a storm-water-collection system for a surrounding urban neighborhood. The new mayor will have to decide if he wants to pick up where we left off.

Is that, in part, why you decided to run for president of the BSA?

I want the BSA to become an important advocacy organization once again. Back in the early ’90s, the BSA played a formative role in thinking about the artery project and imagining what would happen if the artery came down. It was quite impactful. Now, with the change of mayoral administrations, I’d like to see it return to that kind of role again.

And how do you think we can get back there?

I think what’s unique about the BSA is that its members are at the intersection of policy, design, and development economics—three key ingredients to deciding what the physical future of the city should be. You don’t want architects only talking to architects. You want politicians there, and you also want development people there. You want all those folks participating in framing what should happen. Through membership, through committees, through panel discussions, the future of Boston is discussed and debated as a physical place.

So how have we gotten away from this? What’s changed in recent history?

I think that architects need to be more entrepreneurial when it comes to development downtown, planning a university, or thinking about what the agenda actually is. Over the decades, a code of conduct—defined by professional standards and contract templates—has evolved that I think too narrowly defines the architect’s role. The framework is there to protect us from the liability, but the result is that architects aren’t trained to think about development—the need for a building or landscape and how to implement it. Someone else identifies a problem or a need, writes a project brief, and then the architect gets involved. In addition, technology and the digital revolution have dramatically changed the practice in the past 10 years. People in their thirties now are more entrepreneurial than I was at that age, and this is forcing bigger firms to rethink how to assign leadership positions and how to run their businesses. So one of the things I want to do with the BSA is hold a series of panel discussions on how the practice is changing, take a half-step back, and reposition the role of the architect as part of the larger equation.

Civic Arches prototype by Utile Design

Photograph courtesy of Utile Design

Utile’s “Civic Arches” prototype depicts a Long Island garage situated in a downtown setting. The design, created for a competition, anticipates a time when cars no longer rule the city: With its flat floor plates, flexible column grid, and higher-capacity structural system, it can easily adapt to other uses.

And how do you approach this as a professor? How is Northeastern combating low placement rates for architects?

We are thinking very hard about how we can adjust our undergraduate program so our students will be prepared for a wider variety of professions, while still providing an excellent core curriculum in architecture. First, we’re looking at the way metrics and data analysis inform design. It’s a fundamental question: Who decides what to do and where? Who decides that a university needs a new lab building, and what info are they using to decide that? We want architects to be leaders in this area. We want our students to be qualified to go into fields where the translation of data into meaningful, action-oriented information is paramount. We’re also looking at the relationship between buildings and larger urban-planning issues. Our students should be able to succeed in other fields, like landscape architecture and urban planning, if their interests end up taking them in that direction.

Speaking of urban planning, what are some of the challenges of being an urban designer?

Urban planning requires storytelling skills as much as it does good design. The truth is you need a master narrative before you start designing. What if there were a series of three-story residences along this street with a café at the corner and a dog park across the way? Later in the process, after the proposal, feedback will enrich the main story line by bringing in other narratives or characters, as in: This guy is heading to the park after buying a latte; that woman is walking to the dry cleaners. He’s off to work; she’s pushing her daughter to daycare. The best urban places are made up of people doing very different things.

What are some of your favorite spaces in Boston?

My favorite building right now is probably Faneuil Hall. I love the idea of this big barn meeting space where you can do anything. It’s the perfect scale for the mayor to give a speech or to host events. It symbolizes civic life, and it’s the antidote to the generic function room.

Boston Convention Center LED Marquee by Utile Design

Photograph by John Horner

Utile designed the freestanding LED marquee for the Boston Convention and Exhibition Center (BCEC), located on Summer Street. The 76-foot-tall illuminated sign displays the convention center’s ever-changing schedule, as well as its current and upcoming exhibits. 


  • Gail Vallen

    Isn’t this the same designer who promoted building South Station in the Fort Point Channel, but didn’t realize I-90 was there?

  • Mike Mattei

    Master builder? For anyone whose seen this guy in action, especially when his grand schemes are rejected by a panel, knows the ego (this story) doesn’t match the person.

  • Ted C

    Seeing as the Columbia Road team cleaned house last night and overshadowed your Lock Park; has the Alice Brown attack plan commenced? Or, did you hopefully learn something from the Nick Caruso pushback? You’re not the worst designer in Boston, but you’re certainly not the best. The BSA is a TEAM effort T-E-A-M.

  • Martha P

    Thankfully BM covered a designer worthy of a full spread
    Mr. Tim, when you accomplish an 8th of what Jane Thompson has, then you can get the praise you dearly demand.

  • Paula A

    Ugh, Tim Love, what the H. Did you apologize to Nick Caruso yet? I think this is now Alan Plattus ‘ 3rd screw-up with Nick. Maybe just like Alan you should look before you leap.

  • Barbara S

    “Gary” an apology [not apologize] is out of the question [see comments in the link below]. Tim Love will do anything to teach at Yale. Alan Plattus will do anything to suppress a screwup.

  • Barbara S

    And for Yale itself, a man believing in women’s rights is such a threat, they’ll go to great lengths to tarnish his name.

  • John C

    The BSA/AIA is broken. A trust fund architect is advocating for its youngest designers to work for free on his behalf…and the BSA/AIA SUPPORTS IT! Director White should know better

  • Ann L

    As an Allston resident, I am enraged that this ego boy-king is being allowed to push his personal Beacon Park Yard dillusions yet again. He tried this with Yale a few years ago, and frequently mentioned that it wasn’t a waste of money because of his students, or as he referred to them several times “his free labor”.

  • SammyG

    Tim Love is the biggest egotistical maniac this city has seen in quite some time: and this article reinforces it. As mentioned prior, Tim is a “boy king”, in other words, Boston’s very own Joffrey. I pray for the BSA staff, who in Timmy’s worldview, are his servants. Its so, so sad.

  • Dean R

    I looked into this Eric White character. No wonder the BSA has turned into Timmy Love’s playground. The guy phones it in from Charlton….CHARLTON!, the I-84-I-90 intersection town!, and when required mega-commutes by car into Boston. So much for conveying a green urban sustainable image at the BSA. Probably the greenest thing the BSA could do is fire its distant director

  • Carol A

    Harvard is spending thousands of dollars analyzing Beacon Park Yard with top paid professionals. Why exactly do we need a BSA charrette with unpaid students focusing on a well-reviewed parcel? Oh yeah, I forgot, its Tim “Look At Me, Look At Me” Love. BTW, the BY Urban Design Workshop, is this tied to the “Yale Urban Design Workshop”? If so…yikes, it would be the perfect storm of mediocrity and ego. Both Alan Plattus and Tim Love are tantruming babies who hate to be eclipsed: and stoop to horrible levels when they’re beaten out by women. If you think Love’s outbursts are bad, you should have seen Plattus’ meltdowns (yes plural) after being passed over at MIT.

  • Matthew N

    Since Timmy’s election, AIA members have been shifting their funding and resources elsewhere. Several individuals got a taste of what to expect under King Timmy’s rule in November right after the vote. Timmy tried to push every existing consultant off of a Barr Foundation transportation initiative and replace them with a Northeastern-centric team. After a few weeks of working with the inept Northeastern team, Barr shifted back and fulfilled the contract of each original consultant. Another Timmy ego-push…another Timmy bomb. Expect more of the same next month until Timmy is either removed or he bankrupts the BSA.

  • Marcello

    Tim Love is a decent local graphic designer that tries so desperately to be featured as a divine virtuoso of Boston design {this article} How many screw-ups and ego-flexing can the community take? As a trust fund architect, Tim has no sense of reality. We don’t need another Tim Love ego-charrette

  • Jameso

    The Love-Northeastern team proposed stringing a rail line through the Central Artery. Anyone with any knowledge of the CA/T project understands why this is impossible (up,down,left,right). It also showcased the shallowness of the team

    • David K

      Oh lord. And this is the guy who’s going to run the BSA? RA instead of AIA is fine with me for a year. One thing architects have to do on a daily basis is repel the stigma that we live and work in our own little word, and Tim seems to enforce the sitgma on a regular basis

  • Sarah A

    If anyone is looking for urban design and planning programming that’s beyond Timmy Love’s rule, MIT, the GSD, Design Museum Boston, and District Hall have some great events coming up. Nothing is happening at the BSA this Thursday evening (Love pushed out every other event to make room for his charrette, unaware of MassDOT’s 1-90/Beacon Park Yard meeting that same night) MIT/GSD have lectures on the 18th, District Hall is holding a South Boston Transportation meeting.

  • Sarah A

    Also, the Design Museum has an urban design panel on the 25th, you can use the new Assembly stop to get to it. Corey Zehngebot is speaking, she’s amazing

  • Nick Guertin

    After this fall’s recent elections, he is the president-elect and a member of the BSA’s Board of Directors, and will be rotated in to a leadership capacity in the future.

  • Kim Q

    Give two craps is right. He treats the Yale “design outpost”, the urban design workshop, as his own private office. His biggest claim to fame is promoting a one-sided peace park in Israel; wish I had known more before getting involved. But the most upsetting thing I saw with Alan Plattus was when he would make fun of how Asian people eat and talk….and he’s in charge of Yale’s China studio. Sad, sad all around.

  • Ann L

    If he is allowing the Tim Love dillusions to pass, then yes, it merits firing him. 1. Love has tried this in the past, the director should have done his homework 2. you’re allowing your youngest most impressionable members to be used as free labor

  • Kristen R

    Cronyism call is right, Ever since the BSA/AIA moved ABX to the BCEC, the wife of a BCEC exec is at the BSA “working”. I believe her name is Sheryl. If there’s ever a “Real Housewives of Boston” she could play the lead.

  • Matthew N

    Considering who is divorced at Yale, I’m amazed he’s still around. He’s literally making fun of his own boss. Hopefully just like with Timmy Love, Yale and Boston communicate in the future and show Alan the door.

  • Ryan L

    Another epic disaster brought to us by our good friend Mr. Love…with the added gut punch that we’ve been paying for it all along. The BSA has been hounding us for weeks to give to their foundation, stating that their funding is dwindling and limited. Well, if they have enough money to fund a pointless Love model, then they seem to be fine. Our office voted unanimously this morning to suspend future payments to the BSA. RA is fine with us.

  • Sandy

    Tim Love bombs again, and the BSA is in dire financial straits. A change may happen, unfortunately for the worse. Get ready for the Northeastern – Downtown Branch. Wonder how Howeler+Yoon will feel when their green walls are painted red

  • Stephanie S

    Same here, 18-0. Until Tim Love is forced off the board and/or Eric White is fired, we have no interest in funding the BSA

  • Dean S

    The Love charrette was an unmitigated disaster. The half-baked products are already in the trash, Plus, the Love charrette push completed the trifecta of Timmy bombs over the past year (Wash N’ Dry urbanism, poor understanding of engineering, completely unusable, Lock Park, programming on active locks, completely unusable, Beacon Park Yard, schematic blocks that don’t comply with reality, completely unusable.) Mike Davis should really look before tweeting and praising half-baked ideas, it doesn’t look good for anyone. Plus, the Overhaul recap is blocked…NBBJ and Sasaki’s exceptional Green Links work is blocked (both by Timmy Love) but the BSA plans to showcase a charrette that’s been shredded by the community, city, and state? No wonder why architects are jumping ship. I’m still on the fence about suspending future BSA payments, but I’m leaning towards it. Change is required at the BSA

  • Amy

    Mark, Your friends were right, the BSA dumped the material on their page without any follow-up. The projects are so schematic and bland you may think you’re looking at mid-term undergraduate work. Plus, they ignore all of the private property aspects of the site, not to mention business return, ROW, LOS, etc. (No wonder Alex Kreiger bailed on the second forum) Its as if they were designing in their own little fantasy world. The coordinator, Tim Love, should pay for the charrette’s cost, not BSA members. He’s the one who created the disaster, he should be respondsible for it. CBT, well, they’re known for dry and bland, but NBBJ typically produces some decent material. Their Columbia Road schemes for the Green Links competition were excellent, why not feature them? Turns out Tim Love banned the material from being posted/featured at the BSA because it overshadowed his passed over scheme in the same compeititon. What a sore loser. In the future, hopefully the BSA doesn’t waste more of its resources on Tim Love directed junk

  • Val

    The disastrous Tim Love charrette requires immediate change at the BSA. On top of these public flubs, Timmy had two additional bombs this year. He pushed a New South Station proposal in the Fort Point Channel yet was unaware of I-90. He also proposed adding a rail line in CA/T; clearly having no understanding of the highway’s location and engineering. In reality, the Trifecta was a “5-Fecta” of Timmy bombs. BSA Change (and payment suspension) is required.

  • Brian

    Wow…so all of those massive Tim Love failures were on purpose JK. Sounds like a likely scenario. The BSA cannot keep BSA Space open and Love is currently wrecking havoc with the chapter’s finances. Northeastern buys them out…BSA Space becomes NEU Downtown (ie the Tim Love Screw-Up-A-Thon Center). The BSA goes back to their original location or something similar. Actually, it doesn’t sound half bad. The move to 290 Congress was riddled with problems, The NEU bailout would be welcomed. Eric White is a terrible manager and District Hall (+ The Design Museum) are eating BSA Space’s lunch. Nobody wants to go to the sad stair space anymore.